Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026-04-07 Agenda Packet
IN-PERSON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Members of the public are welcome to attend City Council meetings in person. Alternate ways to view meetings live or on-demand include: livestreamed on HBTV Channel 3 (replayed on Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. and Thursday at 6:00 p.m.); live and archived meetings for on-demand viewing accessed from https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/calendar , https://bit.ly/SurfCityTV, or the City's YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/cityofhb , or from any Roku, Fire TV or Apple device by downloading the Cablecast Screenweave App and searching for the City of Huntington Beach channel. PRESENTATION MATERIAL: Digital presentations and/or videos are not displayed at City Council meetings as part of public comment. To present images or materials to the City Council, please bring nine paper copies to the City Council meeting. Paper copies will be distributed to City Council Members at the meeting and will be made part of the public record. Members of the audience and speakers shall not wear or display signs that obstruct the view of other audience members. Signs shall remain with the holder and shall not be placed in adjacent seats or in common areas. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Individuals wishing to provide a comment on agendized or non-agendized items including Study Session, Closed Session, and Public Hearing, may do so in person in the City Council Chambers by completing a Request to Speak form delivered to the City Clerk. Sign-ups to Request to Speak will begin in person 30 minutes prior to the start of Study Session, Closed Session, or Regular City Council Meeting, whichever comes first. Sign-ups will be accepted until the commencement of the public comment period. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION: Members of the public interested in commenting on agenda-related items may submit a written (supplemental) communication to the City Council via email at SupplementalComm@SurfCity-hb.org. Supplemental Communications are considered public record. Communications received by 5:00 PM Monday prior to the City Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council, posted to the City website, and announced at the City Council meeting, though not read. Please note that Supplemental Communications can only be submitted to SupplementalComm@SurfCity-HB.org. Communications received Monday after the 5:00 PM deadline will only be included in the administrative record. MEETING ASSISTANCE NOTICE: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, services are available to members of our community who require special assistance to participate in public meetings. If you require special assistance, 48-hour prior notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements for an assisted listening device (ALD) for the hearing impaired, American Sign Language interpreters, a reader during the meeting and /or large print agendas. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (714) 536-5227 or (714) 374-5390 for more information. AGENDA City Council/Public Financing Authority Tuesday, April 7, 2026 4:00 PM - Closed Session 6:00 PM - Regular Meeting Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CASEY MCKEON, Mayor BUTCH TWINING, Mayor Pro Tem PAT BURNS, Councilman ANDREW GRUEL, Councilman DON KENNEDY, Councilman GRACEY VAN DER MARK, Council Woman CHAD WILLIAMS, Councilman STAFF TRAVIS HOPKINS, City Manager MIKE VIGLIOTTA, City Attorney LISA LANE BARNES, City Clerk JASON SCHMITT, City Treasurer 1 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 4:00 PM - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, Williams Pursuant to Resolution No. 2001-54, Council Woman Van Der Mark and Councilman Twining have requested permission to be absent from this meeting. ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) PUBLIC COMMENTS - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS At this time, the City Council will receive comments from members of the public regarding Closed Session items. Individuals wishing to provide a comment on Closed Session may do so in person by filling out a (SALMON) Request to Speak form delivered to the sergeant at arms. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a Councilmember on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the City Council's Administrative Assistant at (714) 536-5553 or emailing the entire City Council at city.council@surfcity-hb.org. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION 26-3081.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: 21091 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (APN 024-281-16). Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Pouya Honari - Pacific City Hotel, LLC dba Pasea Hotel and Spa (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. 26-2982.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Page 1 of 7 2 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). 26-2993.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). 26-3004.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Firefighters’ Association (HBFA). 26-3015.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Fire Management Association (FMA). 26-3026.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(2).): One (1). 26-3037.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Frahm (Robert), et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30-2023-01319592. 26-3098.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California/Bonta v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. 26-3159.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. Page 2 of 7 3 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Pourvasei (Ramtin) v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01398843. 26-33310.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Grant Parks v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No.: 30-2024-01435113. 26-33711.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Michelle Seeser v. City of Huntington Beach; WCAB Case Nos. ADJ18790952; ADJ18790506; ADJ18790058. 6:00 PM – COUNCIL CHAMBERS RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING ROLL CALL Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, Williams Pursuant to Resolution No. 2001-54, Council Woman Van Der Mark and Councilman Twining have requested permission to be absent from this meeting. INVOCATION In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize or advance any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation. 26-29512.Huntington Beach Police Chaplain Bob Ewing PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 26-29413.Gary Robles, American Legion Post 133 CLOSED SESSION REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) The Mayor will facilitate a voluntary opportunity for members of the Huntington Beach City Council to individually make brief comments to the public. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow for lengthy comments, discussion, or action on topics that are not on the agenda. MAYOR'S SPOTLIGHT Page 3 of 7 4 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 26-29014.Mayor’s Spotlight Presentation BUSINESS HIGHLIGHT 26-29115.Business Highlight Presentation COMMUNITY EVENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) Limited to one representative, one announcement This brief agenda segment is reserved for time-sensitive, organized events taking place within the City that are open to the public or support recognized community goals (e.g., nonprofit fundraisers, library programs, equestrian center events, City-sponsored activities). It is not a public-comment period and is not intended for individual solicitations, private parties, commercial promotions, or political campaigning. Individuals wishing to provide a community event announcement may do so in person by filling out a (WHITE) Request to Speak form delivered to the sergeant at arms. ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time, the City Council will receive comments from members of the public regarding any topic, including items on the open session agenda. Individuals wishing to provide a comment may do so in person by filling out a (PINK) Request to Speak form delivered to the sergeant at arms. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a Councilmember on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the City Council's Administrative Assistant at (714) 536-5553 or emailing the entire City Council at city.council@surfcity-hb.org. While the City Council welcomes public involvement and supports and defends free speech, the City Council rejects comments from anyone that are discriminatory, defamatory or otherwise not protected free speech. Those comments will not inform nor be considered by the City Council and may be cause for the Mayor to interrupt the public speaker. Such public comments will not be consented to or otherwise adopted by the City Council in its discussions and findings for any matter tonight. COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmembers may make brief announcements on any appointments made to a board, committee, or commission. Councilmembers may not discuss or take any action on these announcements. Announcements are limited to 1 minute. AB 1234 REPORTING Page 4 of 7 5 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority Per AB 1234 (Government Code Section 53232.3(d)) Councilmembers who attend a meeting, conference, or similar event at the expense of the City must provide a brief report of the meeting, conference, or similar event during the next regular City Council meeting. Reports are limited to 1 minute. OPENNESS IN NEGOTIATION DISCLOSURES Councilmembers must publicly disclose any meetings or communications with City employee associations, related to the negotiations of labor agreements. Disclosures are limited to 1 minute and must be made by the next regular City Council Meeting. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 16-21) City Clerk 26-29216.Approve and Adopt Minutes Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of March 17, 2026. Recommended Action: Community and Library Services 26-30517.Approve Amendment No. 2 between the State of California, acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City of Huntington Beach for the Operating Agreement OA-40 for Bolsa Chica State Beach Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to Operating Agreement OA-40 between the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City of Huntington Beach and return Amendment No. 2 to State Parks for final processing. Recommended Action: Community Development 26-22018.Adopt Resolution No. 2026-07 declaring weeds and rubbish a public nuisance and scheduling a Public Hearing on May 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to hear protests and objections to the abatement Adopt Resolution No. 2026-07, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Finding and Declaring That Certain Weeds Growing in the City and Rubbish and Refuse Deposited on Public Ways and Private Property are a Public Nuisance; and Fixing the Time for Hearing Protests and Objections to the Abatement Thereof.” Recommended Action: Page 5 of 7 6 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 26-28319.Approve and authorize execution of 3-year Professional Services Contracts in the amount of $700,000 for On-Call Environmental California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Services with LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA), Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Environmental Planning Development Solutions (EPD), and Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI) A) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 “Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and LSA Associates, Inc. for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”; and, B) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Science Associates, for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”; and, C) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 “Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Planning Development Solutions (EPD), for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”; and, D) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 “Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Michael Baker International, Inc., for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”. Recommended Action: Police 26-28920.Approval of Sole-Source Purchase and Installation of Two Trakka TL-360 Searchlight System for Police Department Air Support Unit Approve sole-source purchase and installation of Trakka TL-360 Searchlight system. Recommended Action: Public Works 26-22721.Approve and Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute the Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement. Recommended Action: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS Page 6 of 7 7 AGENDA April 7, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 26-32422.Presentation of Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Wolffhaus for Brand, Media, Press and Digital Ecosystem Comprehensive Audit, Marketing, and Assessment Services for City Council Consideration Review and consider the attached Professional Services Contract and attachments and direct staff accordingly. If City Council votes to approve the attached Professional Services Contract, authorize the City Manager to execute the Contract. Recommended Action: COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS 26-33623.Item Submitted by Councilman Gruel and Councilman Williams - Discussion of State Audit Refer to City Council Member Memorandum (Included as Attachment #1). Recommended Action: ADJOURNMENT The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority is Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Page 7 of 7 8 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-308 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: 21091 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (APN 024-281-16). Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Pouya Honari - Pacific City Hotel, LLC dba Pasea Hotel and Spa (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 9 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-298 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 10 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-299 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 11 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-300 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Firefighters’ Association (HBFA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 12 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-301 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Fire Management Association (FMA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 13 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-302 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9 (d)(2).): One (1). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 14 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-303 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Frahm (Robert), et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30 -2023-01319592. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 15 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-309 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California/Bonta v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 16 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-315 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Pourvasei (Ramtin) v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01398843. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 17 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-333 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Grant Parks v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No.: 30- 2024-01435113. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 18 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-337 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Michelle Seeser v. City of Huntington Beach; WCAB Case Nos. ADJ18790952; ADJ18790506; ADJ18790058. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 19 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-295 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Huntington Beach Police Chaplain Bob Ewing City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 20 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-294 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Subject: Gary Robles, American Legion Post 133 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 21 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-290 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Subject: Mayor’s Spotlight Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 22 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-291 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Subject: Business Highlight Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 23 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-292 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Lane Barnes, City Clerk PREPARED BY:Lisa Lane Barnes, City Clerk Subject: Approve and Adopt Minutes Statement of Issue: The City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of March 17 , 2026, require review and approval. Financial Impact: None Recommended Action: Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of March 17, 2026. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve and/or request revision(s). Analysis: None Environmental Status: Non-Applicable Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. March 17, 2026, CC/PFA regular meeting minutes City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 24 Minutes Regular Meeting City Council/Public Financing Authority City of Huntington Beach Tuesday, March 17, 2026 4:00 PM — Council Chambers 6:00 PM — Council Chambers Civic Center, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 A video recording of the 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM portions of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and archived at https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx 4:00 PM — COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER — 4:00 PM ROLL CALL Present: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (Received After Agenda Distribution) — None PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS — None Mayor McKeon read the titles for Closed Session Items #1 (26-238) and #2 (26-239) Conference with Labor Negotiators regarding Employee Organizations: Huntington Beach Police Officers' Association (HBPOA) and Police Management Association (PMA). A motion was made by Van Der Mark, with a second by Burns, to recess to Closed Session. RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION — 4:01 PM CLOSED SESSION 1. 26-238 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). 2. 26-239 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). 25 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 2 of 15 3. 26-194 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Boyd (Rodregous) v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; OCSC Case No.: 30-2025-01480743. 4. 26-240 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(2).): One (1). 5. 26-241 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. (Voter ID); Case No. 30-2024-01393606. 6. 26-24 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Bixby (Mark) v. Lisa Lane Barnes, et al.; OCSC Case No.: 30-2023-01366664. 7. 26-243 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01397379. 8. 26-244 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California/Bonta v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. 9. 26-258 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Protect HB v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30-2025-01470582. 6:00 PM — COUNCIL CHAMBERS RECONVENED CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING — 6:00 PM ROLL CALL Present: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams Absent: None INVOCATION In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize or advance any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation. 10. 25-943 Huntington Beach Fire and Police Chaplain Roger Wing PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11. 26-257 Norm Sumner, American Legion Post 133 CLOSED SESSION REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY — None CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) 26 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 3 of 15 Councilwoman Van Der Mark, Mayor Pro Tem Twining and Councilman Kennedy shared their heartfelt thoughts and thanked everyone who worked on a 72-hour notice to ensure that Huntington Beach High School graduate Abbi Kerwin and her family were able to participate in Abbi's official private graduation ceremony on March 16, 2026, before her father's imminent passing. Supervisor Nguyen, Chief Parra, Police Officers’ Association, Councilmembers and Code Four were acknowledged for their support. Mayor Pro Tem Twining invited everyone to sing Happy Birthday to Public Affairs Officer Julie Toledo. Councilman Kennedy reminded everyone of the upcoming Pet Adoption Expo on Saturday, April 25, at Huntington Central Park West. ADOPTABLE PET OF THE MONTH PRESENTED BY ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL CARE Jonathan Volzke and Volunteer John Kenners, OC Animal Care, presented two adoptable pets: Daylily, a 2-year-old Boxer mix rescued in Huntington Beach and Xena, a 3-year-old Pit Bull mix rescued from the streets of Fountain Valley. Details can be found at www.OCPetInfo.com. BUSINESS HIGHLIGHT 12. 26-233 Business Highlight Presentation Minute with the Mayor videos were played to recognize David's Tree Service, 19051 Gothard St. / www.DavidsTree.com and Pholucious, 8162 Talbert Avenue, #104. Support local businesses and keep Surf City thriving. Mayor McKeon announced that applications for businesses interested in participating in Minute with the Mayor can be found at www.shoplocalhb.com. Mayor McKeon thanked everyone who attended the recent Chamber of Commerce Mayor's Breakfast at Paseo Hotel, and acknowledged Huntington Beach business leaders' panel and sponsors. COMMUNITY EVENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) Limited to one representative, one announcement — 5 Speakers Shawn Wood, Huntington Beach Kiwanis, Easter Family Fun Day Chair, introduced representatives of community organizations that are instrumental in the success of this annual event and shared a video with highlights from 2025. He announced this year's event is Saturday, April 4, and expressed appreciation for the support of many City departments. Patricia Gallardo, Braille Institute, Youth and Child Development Director, thanked the Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments and Kiwanis for providing this inclusive and accessible egg hunt to ensure disabled and blind children can also participate in the fun. Meridith Randall, Golden West College President, shared that Golden West College is excited to be a sponsor for the first time in 2026. Debbie Killey, Republic Services, noted that Republic Services has participated in this event since the beginning by providing a trash collection truck for the kids to explore up close and personal. Jason Schmitt, City Treasurer, announced the Art of the Distraction Scam on Wednesday, March 18, and An Introduction to Senior Economic Fraud on Friday, March 20. 27 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 4 of 15 ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) Pursuant to the Brown "Open Meetings" Act, City Clerk Lisa Lane Barnes announced supplemental communications received by her office following distribution of the Council Agenda packet which were all uploaded to the City's website and Councilmember iPads: City Manager's Report #15 (26-259) (staff memorandum); and Council Member Items #22 (26-254) (1 email communication). PUBLIC COMMENTS (3-Minute Time Limit) — 15 Speakers The number [hh:mm:ss] following the speakers' comments indicates their approximate starting time in the archived video located at https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. Max Daffron, Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce President/CEO, commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254), submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (00:40:03) Tim Geddes commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254), submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (00:43:20) Leah Theodore commented on her new book for young children. (00:45:58) Brian Thienes, Huntington Beach Planning Commissioner, commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254), submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (00:48:54) Ann Palmer commented on Public Hearing Item #14 (26-221) regarding appeal of Planning Commission's action on Conditional Use Permit No. 22-011 and Coastal Development Permit No. 22-009 (Huntington Club Remodel and Bungalows); Consent Calendar Item #17 (26-230) regarding declaring each February 22nd as "USA Hockey Day" in the City of Huntington Beach; Council Member Items #22 (26-254) submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances, and #23 (26-255) submitted by Mayor McKeon declaring each December 5th as Sugar the Surfing Dog Day. (00:51:54) Amory Hanson commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254) submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (00:53:33) Kathryn Goddard commented on a recent Community and Library Services Commission meeting. (00:54:06) Michael Selna commented on California Senate Bill 868 also known as the Balcony Solar bill. (00:56:38) Russ Neal shared Irish humor for St. Patrick's Day. (00:58:29) Pat Goodman commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254) submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (01:01:01) Bon Gomes, Soul & Arrow Community Foundation Founder, commented on the vision for a performance and recreation campus that would serve youth, veterans and families of the entire Huntington Beach community on the land next to Central Park formerly used for a gunnery. Councilman Williams asked Mr. Gomes to complete a blue card for follow-up. (01:02:45) 28 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 5 of 15 Unnamed Speaker commented on the history of Ramadan and Islamic conquests. (01:06:15) Andrew Einhorn commented on voter ID issues, the SAVE Act. (01:09:24) Unnamed Speaker commented on Council Member Items #22 (26-254) submitted by Councilman Burns regarding transfer of authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. (01:12:30) Unnamed Guest commented on his opinions related to the Police Department. (01:14:19) COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT ANNOUNCEMENTS — None AB 1234 REPORTING — None OPENNESS IN NEGOTIATION DISCLOSURES Councilman Gruel, Mayor Pro Tem Twining and Councilwoman Van Der Mark reported speaking with Huntington Beach Police Officers' Association (HBPOA) representatives. STUDY SESSION 13. 26-206 Held a Joint Study Session of the Citizen Participation Advisory Board (CPAB) and City Council to review funding recommendations for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs for 2026-27 CPAB Roll Call: Chair Hammel, Secretary Pena; Board Members Pappas, Quinn, and Newkirk Councilman Gruel recused himself and left the room because of a conflict of interest in that he is Executive Director of one of the receiving organizations. CPAB Roll Call Present: Pena, Pappas, Quinn, and Newkirk Absent: Hammel City Manager Travis Hopkins introduced Housing Manager Charles Kovac who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Joint Study Session of the City Council and Citizen Participation Advisory Board with slides entitled: Background; 2026-27 Estimated Funding Levels; Public Participation; CDBG Objectives; CDBG Local Priority Objectives; CDBG Allocations; CDBG Public Services; CDBG CAPITAL & HOUSING PRESERVATION PROJECTS; CDBG Administration; HOME Program Objectives; HOME Local Priority Objectives; HOME Allocations (2); Upcoming Action;, and QUESTIONS? CPAB Secretary Joe Pena reported that a large number of local organizations share in a mission to strengthen the community through collaboration with residents and local government. He noted the very difficult and challenging decisions that CPAB makes and thanked City staff members who support their efforts. Councilman Burns asked that the next CPAB presentation include a brief description of each service provider and Manager Kovac acknowledged the request. 29 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 6 of 15 Mayor Pro Tem Twining confirmed with Manager Kovac the HOME Administration (Carryover) amount is funding that was not used in previous years and can only be re-allocated to the preservation and development of affordable housing opportunities. Councilman Kennedy confirmed with Manager Kovac that CPAB is responsible for allocating $161,000 to seven of the nine applicants, and the application process is rather arduous. Manager Kovac noted that the Board reached out to 25 organizations, but only nine completed an application. There was further discussion on the considerations which eliminated two of the applicants, how "Administration" funds are determined, and confirmation that all of the amounts used in this presentation are based on funds received for the past year as the federal government has not yet announced the amount of funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Councilman Williams, Manager Kovac and CPA Board Member Newkirk briefly discussed the rationale that determined the amount of funds awarded to each organization. It was noted that some of the organizations receive additional County and Federal funding. Councilman Burns clarified that CPAB is an "advisory board" and Councilmembers can make adjustments to the suggested amounts. PUBLIC HEARING 14. 26-221 CONTINUED Appeal of Planning Commission’s Action on Conditional Use Permit No. 22-011 and Coastal Development Permit No. 22-009 (Huntington Club Remodel and Bungalows) Mayor McKeon called for Councilmembers to disclose ex parte communications. Mayor Pro Tem Twining stated speaking to the Applicant; Mayor McKeon spoke with the Lessee of the Applicant, and noted the Applicant asked for additional time for his presentation. Councilwoman Van Der Mark recused herself and left the room because of a conflict of interest. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION REGARDING THIS PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to the Brown "Open Meetings" Act, City Clerk Lisa Lane Barnes announced supplemental communications received by her office following distribution of the Council Agenda packet which were all uploaded to the City's website and Councilmember iPads: Public Hearing Item #14 (26-221) (Applicant PowerPoint presentation and Planning Commission Action). Director of Community Development Jennifer Villasenor introduced Principal Planner Joanna Cortez who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Appeal of Planning Commission’s Action on CUP No. 22- 011 and CDP No. 22-009 (Huntington Club Remodel and Bungalows) with slides entitled: Project Location; Project Request (3); Site Plan; Design and Layout; Planning Commission Action; Appeal; Analysis; Summary; and QUESTIONS Councilman Williams clarified with Principal Planner Cortez that the Recommended Action includes the Planning Commission modifiers. Councilman Burns clarified with Director Villasenor that Councilmembers could approved the project as presented, or deny the project based on the fact they can't make the findings approved by the Planning Commission, or continue the item and direct staff for additional information. 30 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 7 of 15 Councilmember Kennedy and Director Villasenor discussed the original CUP issued in the late 1980's and noted the primary use will continue to be a private tennis and golf club (commercial/recreation facility) with the new club house and proposed loft and bungalows being ancillary to the primary use. For the benefit of the public, there was a staff review of the Planning Commission's modifying conditions. Mayor McKeon opened the Public Hearing. PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS (3-Minute Time Limit) — 9 Speakers Jonathan Bailey, Project Manager for the Huntington Club Improvements, granted 5 minutes to speak by Mayor McKeon, presented a PowerPoint communication showing an overview schematic of the proposed club house, loft and bungalow project; proposed landscaping improvements; Club Amenities: Today vs After Improvements; Bungalow renderings (2); Inspiration; Pictures of existing facilities; Aerial rendering of proposed facilities (4); New Club House 1st Floor schematic; Project aerial rendering; Applicant's Planning Application; pictures of proposed lighting options (3); Tennis Court Adequacy; and Huntington Club Improvements. Mr. Bailey asked that Councilmembers deny the appeal for the reasons outlined in his last slide. (01:55:41) Tom McDaniel, Huntington Club Member for over 40 years, commented on the elements of this plan which raise his concerns. He stated he supports improving the Club and agrees investment is needed and welcomed. The question to be considered from his perspective is whether this particular proposal provides use that is consistent with the zoning and appropriate approval under the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and whether the impacts of that use have been fully evaluated. Is transient lodging permitted in recreation zoning designations? Was this project properly approved under a Class 32 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption which requires consistency with the Zoning and General Plan? This proposal introduces overnight accommodations and short-term stays from a property designated for residential open space. Is this still an accessory use for a private Club or is it closer to a lodging use in practice? Will the tennis courts continue to be used during this construction project? (02:03:25) Cheryl Gates, Appellant, a member of the Huntington Club, commented on the fact that the project is expected to raise approximately $500,000 in revenue for the City annually, at a 10% tax rate, this implies nearly $5M in lodging income. This suggests to her that the loft and bungalows are not just a minor "accessory" amenity, but rather reflects high intensity use on a property zoned for recreation and open space. Will the Club operate as a lodging operator rather than a traditional private Club amenity? Regarding whether the project falls short or exceeds revenue projections, there is meaningful uncertainty. She also noted there are no detailed financial projections, sensitivity analysis or contingency planning related to this project that would allow anyone to fully understand how resilient the plan is. Nor has there been any change-of-use consideration with different considerations. It is important to get use and scope right at the onset as these dynamics are difficult to reverse once the project is complete. She supports Club improvements and success, but believes this proposal introduces a business endeavor with real financial and operational implications which deserve careful consideration. (02:06:49) Eddie Stokes, Huntington Club Member and Founder/CEO of a residential construction company, has first-hand experience understanding how long construction projects can take, how they impact access, and how disruptive projects can be to the surrounding community. As a major demolition and reconstruction project he expects this project will take 18 months or more, right at the center of the property, effectively impacting member access and safety during that time. Where is the plan for Club operation during demolition and reconstruction? (02:10:26) 31 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 8 of 15 John Ridgway, 25-year Member of the Huntington Club and Seacliff Country Club, commented on the regular and predictable use of Huntington Club courts and organized activities. He believes this is not about resisting change or protecting personal preferences, but rather recognizing that today the Club operates as a coordinated recreational facility with predictable access and shared use. What is being proposed is a different model, one with increased intensity and new demands which have practical consequences. The physical layout contributes to less predictable recreational activities, court activity becomes harder to schedule, and the way the Club functions begins to shift. Needed improvements should be aligned with how the Club functions rather than change how the Club functions without full review. (02:13:39) Lisa Wellman respectfully requested that Council continue this discussion rather than making a decision tonight because this proposal appears to create a major shift in land use and operational intensity, and is not just a facility improvement. She believes the bungalows are a major land use shift and are not in compliance with the CUP or CEQA, which creates meaningful uncertainty for this proposal. She asked Councilmembers to ensure Huntington Beach zoning laws are followed. Recreational space in Huntington Beach is important to all residents and more time is needed for full consideration of this proposal. (She asked for additional speaking time to propose alternate considerations but her request was not honored until later in the discussion, where it is documented.) (02:15:57) James Jensen, Huntington Club Member, commented on the support a majority of Club members have for the proposal, except for the bungalows. He noted the strong support for the proposed court improvements and noted that the current CUP prohibits in perpetuity lighting for courts 11 – 16. If that CUP requirement is removed, he believes all abutting homeowners, including his residence, will be negatively impacted by night light pollution, an issue he has personally been dealing with for some time. (02:20:30) Robert O Hill, Co-Applicant, stated that 25 years ago he acquired the 160-acre Seacliff County Club and about four years ago he was able to change to a new tenant and reviewed the improvements made during this transition. Now it is time to upgrade and improve the Tennis Club to benefit the members, Huntington Beach, guests and the tenant. The vision includes improvements to the swimming facilities, as well as the performance wellness center. He is spending about $16M and the tenant is spending about $4M in proposal improvements. He requested that Council adopt the Planning Commission's unanimous approval of this project. (02:23:24) Brian Thienes, Huntington Beach Planning Commissioner, provided an overview of the Commission's considerations, including the fact that open space designation allows for accessory structures. He explained Code 204.14 defines "accessory" as structures which are incidental to the principal permitted use, or structures on a site which are customary to other similar sites, and accessory dwelling units. He added the Planning Commission found no significant CEQA impacts, and noted that during the Commission’s discussions Commissioners disregarded the financial information related to potential annual revenue to the City. (02:26:24) Mayor McKeon closed the Public Hearing. Mayor McKeon expressed appreciation to the Applicant and Appellant for their presentations. Mayor McKeon opened the Councilmember discussion which included confirming the Applicant owns the property and leases out the operation of Huntington Club; there currently is not an agreement with the tenant to operate the bungalows; Planning Commission’s condition that short-term accommodations are 32 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 9 of 15 limited to only Club Members and their guests; current tenant is contractually obligated to cooperate with any management company brought in to operate the bungalows and loft, such as sharing membership information and numbers so the management company can verify appropriate people are making bungalow reservations for themselves and their guests; Council concern regarding a potential conflict if the bungalows are built but there is not a contractual agreement in place to operate them such as providing for laundry, food, beverage and maid services; a better picture of the basis for potential revenue numbers; clarification on who is going to pay for the tennis court lights; and Applicant is adverse to a continuation of Council's decision due to the length of time it could take to give the current tenant first-right-of-refusal and then proceed to vet the right management for the bungalows and lofts. Councilman Kennedy, Director Villasenor and Applicant continued the discussion regarding a masterplan and management expectations that members and their guests only are allowed to make short-term live- in accommodations; lighting for the six existing tennis courts will require a whole new entitlement process which requires a public notice and hearing through the Planning Commission for their denial or approval, and noted the application has been submitted for that process; and Applicant is working with a lighting consultant to ensure the lighting proposal will satisfy Planning Commission concerns. Councilman Gruel continued the discussion with Director Villasenor and Applicant by reviewing the Public Hearing Speaker comments from the Huntington Beach resident who lives adjacent to the Club, that the current lighting used already creates light pollution for adjacent homeowners; the purpose of the Environmental Protection Amendment (EPA) is to determine if newer technology can be used which does not impact adjacent residents; the current lighted courts are in violation of the existing CUP; the new lighting is proposed to shut off at 8:30 PM; and unfortunately the current management party is not present to be involved in these discussions or planning. Mayor Pro Tem Twining, a Huntington Club Member, expressed his excitement for this huge upgrade project and concern about how to address safety issues for pedestrians on the street located between the courts which leads to the bungalows; disappointment that Mr. Hill expects the golf manager to pay for tennis court improvements and stated interest in contracting with another managing organization for serving the bungalows and lofts; Mayor Pro Twining stated he would like a bit more time for the Applicant to address some of these issues before casting his vote on this item. Applicant Hill explained the current management for Huntington Club chose not to operate the bungalows at another property, i.e., Spanish Hills, and therefore the Applicant expects a refusal for Huntington Club, and added it would be great if they choose to manage the Huntington Club bungalows. Councilman Burns, Applicant and Councilman Kennedy discussed the basis for the financial projection in annual revenue for Huntington Beach which consists of a combination of sales, use and property taxes. Councilman Kennedy, speaking as a former Planning Commissioner, stated that from his viewpoint this proposal fits zoning and CUP requirements, except for the tennis court lighting and that issue is in process of being addressed. The Applicant confirmed that tennis court upgrades will be addressed and paid for by them and not placed on the management company. City Attorney Mike Vigliotta clarified this item is strictly a land-use decision that should not be based on any financial considerations. Councilman Williams confirmed with Applicant that currently the tennis court lights are not permitted through the original CUP and the lights will remain off until the new CUP is approved; the Applicant has the right to work with a vendor of their choice for management of the lofts and bungalows; they are not obligated to give right-of-first-refusal to the current golf management; if Council approval was provided tonight, there is probably an 18 – 24-month permitting process before construction can begin; it is 33 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 10 of 15 expected to take a 6 – 9 month vetting process to select the lofts and bungalows management if refused by the current golf management; Councilman Gruel stated it is important for the Applicant to immediately address the issue of the apparent on-going current violation of the existing CUP with tennis court night lights, and invited the Public Hearing Speaker to return to the podium and expand upon the compromises she alluded to when her previous speaking time ran out. Mayor McKeon Re-opened the Public Hearing to allow for the additional Public Hearing Speaker comments requested by Councilman Gruel. Unnamed Speaker noted the issue from her perspective is that the bungalows are planned on top of the tennis courts and the concerns would be eliminated if the bungalows were planned along the golf course. She believes there are three potential compromises that should be considered: rather than designing three single-story bungalows with separate back yards and spas, 1) consider two-story bungalows to allow for the same number of guests with a smaller footprint; for the planned 3,100 sq. ft. rental unit (1,800 sq. ft. living space with 1,200 sq. ft. patio), 2) consider reducing the patio space which may allow for four units while preserving recreational space; and 3) consideration of the fact that everyone renting a loft or bungalow will be using the amenities which will impact all other members. She also shared her concerns about the fact that short-term rentals are not allowed in Huntington Beach. (03:10:45) Mayor McKeon closed the Re-opened Public Hearing. Councilman Kennedy briefly reviewed how the City is addressing illegal short-term rentals and stated it should be easy to manage the process to ensure only Huntington Club members and their guests are using Club facilities. Mayor McKeon, Councilmen Williams and Kennedy stated they are uncomfortable with some potential loose ends like lack of defined operational expectations and enforcement options for managing the bungalows and lofts regardless if through the current golf management or bringing in new management that needs to cooperate with the current golf management; confirmation that tennis court night lights have been turned off for those courts not currently approved; include the current golf management in the planning discussions; formal confirmation on who is paying for court remediations; and re-engagement of discussions between Applicant and Appellant to reach agreeable solutions. City Attorney Mike Vigliotta advised that current discussion on whether or not the use of court night lights will be approved is not appropriate for this meeting will be addressed as part of that permitting process. A motion was made by McKeon, second Burns to continue to a date certain, April 21, 2026, Appeal of Planning Commission Action to find Conditional Use Permit No. 22-011 and Coastal Development Permit No. 22-009 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32; and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 22-011 and Coastal Development Permit No. 22-009 with suggested findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1), as amended to require continued meeting(s) with Appellant to discuss and consider their requests; report back on those discussions; provide update on permit status and details on proposed court lighting options; and confirmation that the existing court lighting violation has been resolved. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, and Williams 34 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 11 of 15 NOES: None RECUSED: Van Der Mark NOTE: Original Agenda order is maintained for these Minutes, disregarding the actual order items were addressed during the meeting. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 15. 26-259 Upcoming Refuse Rate Adjustments City Manager Travis Hopkins announced this is a for your information (FYI) only item, and introduced Senior Management Analyst Debra Jubinsky who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Refuse Rate Adjustments with slides entitled: Key Issues Affecting Refuse Services and Rates, County Landfill Disposal, Change in State Law, Proposed Solutions, Proposed New Rates, Upcoming Action Items, and Questions? Councilwoman Van Der Mark stated these changes in service and rate increases come from State mandates and asked for more details on SB1383. Senior Management Analyst Jubinsky explained that SB1383 was adopted by the State Legislature in 2016 and it took several years to get through the regulatory process. Technically, it went into effect January 1, 2022, and now Huntington Beach is required to implement the regulations. Councilman Kennedy confirmed with Senior Management Analyst Jubinsky that Huntington Beach was able to negotiate the three-year implementation period for the fee increases for both the landfill and service components: increase of $7.58 in 2026; $2 and change in 2027 and $1 and change in 2028, in addition to the typical Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases expected over time. Senior Management Analyst Jubinsky added that these details will be explained in the community notification material being sent out. Councilmember Kennedy noted this is not a profit generator for the City, but rather a pass-through of actual cost increases. Councilman Gruel described his experiences and frustrations of complying with State mandated recycling policies in the food service industry and confirmed with Senior Management Analyst Jubinsky that the law allows for cities to issue case-by-case exemptions in situations where businesses may not even have space for another refuse container. There was further discussion on "Lid Lift" enforcement which cannot be delegated to Republic Services. The City is planning for one new position for compliance and enforcement to cover both commercial and residential operations. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 16 - 21) City Clerk 16. 26-232 Approved and Adopted Minutes A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of March 3, 2026. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: 35 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 12 of 15 AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None City Manager 17. 26-230 Adopted Resolution No. 2026-08 Declaring each February 22nd as "USA Hockey Day" in the City of Huntington Beach A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to Adopt Resolution No. 2026-08 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Declaring each February 22nd as 'USA Hockey Day' in the City of Huntington Beach." The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None Public Works 18. 26-172 Approved the West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) Joint Powers Authority Fiscal Year 2026/27 proposed budget in the amount of $1,518,500 A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to Approve the West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) Proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 budget, including the City of Huntington Beach's share in the amount of $459,894. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 19. 26-146 Accepted the lowest responsive and responsible bid and authorized execution of a construction contract with Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc./Vidmar, Inc., a JV, in the amount of $4,495,550 for the McFadden Sewer Lift Station, Wet Well Project Phase 2, (CC1610); Rejected bids 1-3; Authorized a 15% in contingency; and Authorized appropriation of additional funds A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to appropriate $4,356,300.09 in additional funding from the Sewer Service Fund (511); and accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid submitted by Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc./Vidmar, Inc., a JV, in the amount of $4,495,550; and reject bids 1-3 as non- responsive to the bid requirements; and authorize the Director of Public Works to approve change orders up to a 15% contingency for potential construction change orders; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a construction contract with Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc./Vidmar, Inc., a JV, in a form approved by the City Attorney. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 36 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 13 of 15 20. 26-223 Accepted the lowest responsive and responsible bid and authorized execution of a construction contract with Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $3,278,000 for the Residential Zone 3 Overlay Maintenance Project, CC-1839 A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid submitted by Hardy & Harper, Inc., in the amount of $3,278,000; and authorize the Director of Public Works to approve change orders up to 10% contingency in potential construction change orders; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a construction contract with Hardy & Harper, Inc. in a form approved by the City Attorney. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 21. 26-229 Adopted Ordinance No. 4347, amending Section 14.16.190 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Protecting Cross Connections — Approved for Introduction March 3, 2026, by a vote of 6–0–1 (Burns — Absent) A motion was made by Van Der Mark, second Burns to adopt Ordinance No. 4347, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Section 14.16.190 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Protecting Cross Connections." The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS 22. 26-254 CONTINUED Amended Item Submitted by Councilman Burns — Transfer of Authority of Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances Councilman Burns introduced this item by reading his Issue Statement and explaining some Conditional Use Permits (CUP) are very straightforward whereas others are not. He believes there is the possibility to improve a system where currently one person has final authority over seven Council-appointed Planning Commissioners, and his effort is to ensure "community" is put before "development/developers" in these decisions. His intent is to explore an opportunity for preventing poor community—friendly decisions. Mayor McKeon suggested this become a fact-finding mission asking staff to come back with a report of CUPs which Zoning Administrators have discretion over. He added that from his experience in the commercial real estate industry, every discretionary CUP approval has gone before a Planning Commission, and he finds it unusual that in Huntington Beach an unelected position has discretionary CUP authority. He suggested this might provide an opportunity for code updates to address some of the discretionary issues that currently require a CUP. 37 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 14 of 15 Councilmember Kennedy, speaking from his experience as a former Planning Commissioner, clarified there is no intent to eliminate the Zoning Administrator position but rather consider a timely and responsive process that ensures the right questions are asked and the right answers are provided. Councilman Kennedy and Planning Director Jennifer Villasenor discussed why permit fees increase for items that go before the Planning Commission vs Zoning Administrator. It was noted that larger projects take longer to analyze and typically go to the Planning Commission. Fees are directly related to the time it takes to process a project. Councilman Kennedy suggested it might be time to set up a third fee category for projects that barely exceed the typical 20 percent threshold. Or the option to define a category of CUPs that could be segregated away from the Zoning Administrator. Councilman Burns described a theoretical situation he would like to see addressed is when a homeowner's plan to build a huge monstrosity will cost a neighbor $5,000 to $6,000 to file an appeal. Councilman Williams noted that in reality there are 14 different individuals who can currently appeal a project at no cost. In his opinion it is the responsibility of Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners to pay attention to the projects on the Zoning Administrator's agenda and be aware of whether approval was given. Councilmember Williams stated it will take some work to create a hybrid process to tweak the Municipal Code. Councilman Burns stated he would like to see authority for CUPs and Variances transferred to the Planning Commission until a staff report can be reviewed. City Attorney Mike Vigliotta stated that any change made will be to the Municipal Code which will require a complete process before being implemented. Mayor McKeon confirmed with Planning Director Villasenor the list of CUPs that currently go to the Zoning Administrator can easily be pulled from the Municipal Code; as well as recommendations on which CUPs might be eliminated and become more administrative or ministerial; and presentation of a potential new fee structure would be a more time-consuming process. Councilman Gruel added that from a business perspective, time is money and the wait for a Planning Commission meeting is counter to the "streamline" effort. There was discussion on specific development projects to document the fact that the Zoning Administrator made decisions that Councilmembers feel did not adequately consider approval impact upon the residential neighborhood. Councilwoman Van Der Mark stated support for the need to make adjustments, possibly through amendments, but she doesn't want to disrupt a process until there is a plan in place that will not be disruptive to applicants in the meantime. A motion was made by Gruel, second Van Der Mark to CONTINUE withdrawing authority as soon as possible of the Zoning Administrator from authorizing Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and Variances. All CUP and Variances to go to the Planning Commission for review and Approval or Denial; as amended to ask staff to return on April 21, 2026, with a list of current Zoning Administrator CUP authority; suggestions for updating the Zoning Code to consider realigning CUP authority, including a timeline for a potential new fee schedule; and evaluate opportunities to update the zoning code for efficiency in the entitlement process. 38 Council/Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes March 17, 2026 Page 15 of 15 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 23. 26-255 Approved Amended Item Submitted by Mayor McKeon — Declare each December 5th as Sugar the Surfing Dog Day Mayor McKeon introduced Sugar, Huntington Beach's Hall of Fame Champion, as a six-time Surf City Dog Champion; five-time World Dog Surfing Champion, with 21 First Place trophies, and 34 trophies overall; three-time Purina Pro Plan Incredible Dog Challenge trophy hoarder for the Malibu Classic and Santa Cruz Longboard Union Contest; and four-time Helen Woodward Animal Hospital Dog-a-thon Champ. Sugar was inducted into the Huntington Beach Surfer's Hall of Fame on December 5, 2024. A short video showing Sugar in action was shared. Ryan, Sugar's owner expressed his appreciation for the recognition, especially since Sugar was recently diagnosed with cancer and is fading quickly. Ryan presented an enlarged canvas picture of Sugar's last ride in Huntington Beach to the Councilmembers. A motion was made by McKeon, second Burns to Celebrate Sugar the Surfing Dog, a five—time World Champion, five—time Huntington Beach Surf City Dog Champion, and a Surfers' Hall of Fame Inductee, as amended to ask for a resolution to be brought back for Council approval, — and declare each December 5th as "Sugar the Surfing Dog Day." The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None ADJOURNMENT — At 10:37 PM a motion was made by Twining, with a second by McKeon, to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority on Tuesday, April 7, 2026, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov _______________________________________ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and Secretary of the Public Financing Authority of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk-Secretary ______________________________________ Mayor-Chair 39 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-305 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services PREPARED BY:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services Subject: Approve Amendment No. 2 between the State of California, acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City of Huntington Beach for the Operating Agreement OA-40 for Bolsa Chica State Beach Statement of Issue: The City of Huntington Beach (City) and the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks), currently operate under Operating Agreement OA 40 for the care, maintenance, and control of Bolsa Chica State Beach. The agreement is set to expire on December 1, 2026. To ensure uninterrupted operations and to allow both parties adequate time to negotiate a new long term operating agreement, State Parks has prepared Amendment No. 2, which extends the agreement term for two additional years, and incorporates newly required Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) language. The City must approve and execute Amendment No. 2 to maintain continuity of operations and comply with updated State Parks administrative requirements. Upon approval of a new long-term agreement, Amendment No. 2 would expire. Financial Impact: There is no additional fiscal impact associated with approval of Amendment No. 2. The City will continue its obligation to cover costs of developing, maintaining, controlling, and operating Bolsa Chica State Beach consistent with the terms of the Operating Agreement. Recommended Action: Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to Operating Agreement OA-40 between the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City of Huntington Beach and return Amendment No. 2 to State Parks for final processing. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 2 40 File #:26-305 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Analysis: Operating Agreement OA 40 between the City and State Parks was originally executed on December 1, 1986, to facilitate the City’s care, maintenance, and control of Bolsa Chica State Beach. This area is inclusive of the beach north of the Huntington Beach Pier to Seapoint Street. The agreement's term was subsequently extended by 20 years through Amendment No. 1 on October 4, 2004, extending the agreement through December 1, 2026. State Parks recently completed legal review of a subsequent amendment and requested the addition of supplemental recital language clarifying the purpose and history of Amendment No. 1. Additionally, State Parks now requires the inclusion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) language in all new agreements and amendments, consistent with statewide administrative policy. Amendment No. 2 incorporates this new clause. Amendment No. 2 will: ·Extend the agreement term through December 1, 2028 ·Add a Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Clause ·Maintain all other existing terms and conditions Approval of Amendment No. 2 will ensure uninterrupted operations at Bolsa Chica State Beach while the City and State Parks continue to meet. Staff and State Parks anticipate having a final draft of the agreement completed by June 2026. State Parks’ approval process can take up to 16 months to complete. Upon approval of the new agreement, Amendment No. 2 would immediately expire. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. RCA Contract Agreement Summary 2. Amendment No. 2 to the Operating Agreement OA-40 for Bolsa Chica State Beach 3. Extending CA Bolsa Chica State Operating Agreement Original 1986 4. CA Bolsa Chica State Beach Operating Agreement City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 2 41 RCA Contract Agreement Summary CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VENDOR NAME + TYPE OF SERVICE CONTRACT INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION TYPE OF AGREEMENT (Professional Services, Service Agreement) PROCUREMENT SCOPE OF WORK TOTAL COMPENSATION TERM OF CONTRACT/AGREEMENT OTHER: Bonds, Special Contract Terms, Emergency DATE PRESENTED REQUESTING DEPARTMENT STAFF CONTACT(S)INSURANCE STATUS April 7, 2026 City Insured Community & Library Services Ashley Wysocki City will continue its obligation to cover costs Through December 1, 2028. Amendment No 2 between the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City for the Operating Agreement OA-40 for Bolsa Chica State Beach. Operating Agreement of Bolsa Chica State Beach, north of the Huntington Beach Pier to Seapoint Street. Not applicable for the operating agreement. Operating Agreement to facilitate the City's care, maintenance, and control of Bolsa Chica State Beach, north of the Huntington Beach Pier to Seapoint Street. Not applicable. 42 LO CITY OF rD HUNTINGTON BEACH Page 1 of 3 Amendment No. 2 to Operating Agreement OA-40 for Bolsa Chica State Beach This AMENDMENT NO. 2 is made and entered into between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting through the Department of Parks and Recreation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE", and the CITY of Huntington Beach, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", collectively referred to as the “PARTIES.” WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public Resources Code Section 5080.30 et seq., a twenty (20) year Operating Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement") was entered into by and between the STATE and CITY effective December 1, 1986, to provide for the care, maintenance, and control of Bolsa Chica State Beach; and WHEREAS, STATE and CITY entered into Amendment 1 to assign CITY all of STATE'S rights, interests, and duties in the concession contract with Donald W. Tosh, Ted. E. Christensen, and Tom A. Lewis (referred to as "TLC") to operate various facilities within Bolsa Chica State Beach, as was stipulated to happen in the original agreement; WHEREAS, STATE and CITY, as allowed in the Agreement, extended the term of the Agreement by an additional 20 years on October 4, 2004, thus extending the Agreement through December 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, STATE and CITY desire to extend the term of the Agreement to allow the PARTIES time to negotiate a new agreement (P25OT001) for the care, maintenance, administration, and control of Bolsa Chica State Beach, and; WHEREAS, STATE requires all new agreements and amendments to existing agreements to include language regarding the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence; WHEREAS, STATE has provided at least 30 days’ written notice and a copy of Amendment to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and benefits herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. In the Agreement, REPLACE lines 1-10 of Paragraph 1. Term to read as follows: “CITY shall be responsible for a period beginning on the date first above 43 Page 2 of 3 appearing and ending forty-two years from said date. During said period, CITY shall pay all costs of developing, maintaining, controlling, and operating said property for said purposes and STATE shall not, during said period, be liable for the cost of said development, maintenance, control, or operation. Nothing herein shall preclude CITY from receiving grants for such purposes to the full extent otherwise permitted by law.” II. Add the following language as “Paragraph 19. Generative Artificial Intelligence”: A. “Generative AI (GenAI)” means an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system's training data. (Gov. Code §11549.64.) 1) CITY shall immediately notify the STATE in writing if it: (1) intends to provide GenAI as a deliverable to the STATE; or (2), intends to utilize GenAI, including GenAI from third parties, to complete all or a portion of any deliverable that materially impacts: (i) functionality of a STATE system, (ii) risk to the STATE, or (iii) Agreement performance. For avoidance of doubt, the term “materially impacts” shall have the meaning set forth in State Administrative Manual (SAM) §4986.2 Definitions for GenAI. 2) Notification shall be provided to the STATE designee identified in this Agreement. 3) At the direction of the STATE, CITY shall discontinue the provision to the STATE of any previously unreported GenAI that results in a material impact to the functionality of the System, risk to the STATE, or Agreement performance, as determined by the STATE. 4) If the use of previously undisclosed GenAI is approved by the STATE, then CITY will update the Deliverable description, and the Parties will amend the Agreement accordingly, which may include incorporating the GenAI Special Provisions into the Agreement, at no additional cost to the State. 5) The STATE, at its sole discretion, may consider CITY’S failure to disclose or discontinue the provision or use of GenAI as described above, to constitute a material breach of Agreement when such failure results in a material impact to the functionality of the System, risk to the STATE, or Agreement performance. The STATE is entitled to seek any and all remedies available to it under law as a result of such breach, including but not limited to termination of the Agreement. The effective date of this AMENDMENT shall be the date of approval by the California Department of General Services. 44 Page 3 of 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect. Each of the PARTIES represents that it has reviewed the terms of this amendment, and by executing this amendment, agrees to its terms. Each of the PARTIES whose signature appears below represents that they have the authority to enter into this amendment. Signatures CITY OF HUNTINGTON STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEACH CALIFORNIA PARKS AND RECREATION Signed: ______________________ Signed: ____________________________ Name: _______________________ Name: _Armando Quintero_____________ Title: _________________________ Title: __Director______________ Date: _________________________ Date: ______________________________ APPROVED: DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES: 45 46 (21) September 7, 2004 • CounciUAgency Minutes• Page 21 (City CouncU) Approved Project Plans and Specifications and Authorized Advertisement of Bids for the Central Parle and Warner & Nichols Storm Water Treatment Project; CC- 1257 {600.60) -Approved the project plans and specifications and authorized the Director of Public Works to request bids for the Central Par1< and Warner & Nichols Storm Water Treatment Project, CC~1257. Submitted by the Public Works Director. Funding Source: Funds are budgeted in the Proposition 13 -2000 Water Bond Act Grant Account. The enginee(s cost estimate is $450,000. (City Council} Adopted Resolution No. 2004--72 Amending the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Surf City Lifeguard Employees' Association (SCLEA) by Adopting the Side Letter of Agreement Re: the 1,500 Hours Provision (Number of Permitted Work Hours within a Twelve-Month Period) (720.20) - Adopted Resolution No. 2004-72 -"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Surf City Lifeguard Employees' Association, by Adopting the Side Letter of Agreement (Regarding Number of Permitted Work Hours within a Twelve-Month Period)." Submitted by the Administrative Services Director. F !,!n(l.log,,SQur.ce:_~o .. co.sL----""--•--"-··----·---- __ , ...... ,,.-,,.~......--".!i''"_,,. __ -,.,.--.,..~-,,,.,.,--~~ ,,,..,,.,,~~~ ,,.,,,,.,. (City Council) Directed Staff to Prepare Mayor's letter to the State Department of Parks and ;1 Recreation Exercising City's Option to Extend the Bolsa Chica State Beach Operating Agreement between the City and the State of California for 20 Years (November 30, 2006 to November 30, 2026) (120.90)-Approved exercising the city's option granted in the 1986 Bolsa Chica State Beach Operating Agreement between the city and the State of California to extend the term for a period of twenty years from November 30, 2006 to November 20. 2026, and authorized staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature to communicate the option to the State Department of Parks and Recreation. Submitted by the Community Services Director. Funding Source: Not applicable. _------ (City Council) Approved a Reimbursement Agreemen ~~nd Huntington Center Associates, LLC for Professional Buildlng Inspection Services in Connection with the Bella Terra Project-Authorized Appropriation of Funds (600.10) -1. Approved the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Huntington Center Associates, LLC and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign; and 2. Appropriated Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000} to Building & Safety Department operating account number 10055201.69365 in connection with the Reimbursement Agreement between the City and Huntington Center Associates, LLC; and 3. Authorized the acceptance of two payments of $45,000.00 on or before October 1, 2004 and February 1, 2005 from Huntington Center Associates, LLC for building inspection services. Submitted by the Building and Safety Director. Funding Source: Toe proposed Agreement allows the developer to pay for expanded services by depositing funds totaling $90,000. Two payments of $45,000 each will be made on or before October 1, 2004, and February 1, 2005. (City Council} Approved the Children's Needs Task Force Reappointments of Ian Collins, Patricia Guidotti, Phyllis Lembke, and Catherine McGough and the Appointments of Adam Buttons and Rebecca Keene for a Term of September 1, 2004 to August 31, 2008 and Approved the Student Appointment of Katherine Do and Student Reappointment of Travis Holler for a Term of September 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005 (570.70} Councilmember Coerper requested that this agenda item be removed from the Consent Calendar to highlight the names of the appointees and reappointees. 47 2000 MAIN STREET CALI FOR NIA 92648 October 5, 2004 State of California Department of Parks & Recreation 3030 Avenida del Presidente San Clemente CA 92672 Dear Director: OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone (714) 536-5553 Re: Operating Agreement -Bolsa Chica State Beach; Exercise of 20-Year Option Pursuant to Paragraph 1. Term, of the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation Operating Agreement for Bolsa Chica State Beach with the City of Huntington Beach, may this letter serve as the city's exercise of the option to extend subject agreement an additional twenty-years. The initial term of this agreement ends on December 1, 2006. In accor dance with Paragraph 1 thereof, the city must exercise the additional-term option one year prior to the end of the initial term. On September 7, 2004, the Huntington Beach City Council approved exercising the additional twenty-year option for the operating agreement (approved action attached). Please have the appropriate state representative sign below and return this letter to my office to indicate the state's approval of the additional twency'.7:_, • year term on the Bolsa Chica State Beach Ope~ating Agreement. Approv~: of this letter will effectively change the term of the agreement to Decembef . 1, 2026. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, /) Mayor City of Huntington Beach JBE:cr Attachment APPROVAL: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Parks & Recreation ~~ cc: City Council; City Administrator; City Attorney; City Clerk Sacramento Office of State Parks & Recreatio~ Anjo, Japan SISTER CITIES \V ai takere. New Zeala,n<l 48 Council/Agency Meeting Held: _____ .....,.... __ Deferred/Continued to: --------- )a-Approved □ Conditionally Approved 0 Denied Council Meeting Date: September 7, 2004 SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY: !PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ~ C:,.) HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ':§'. PENELOPE CULBR ✓~~~ini~ ~ ?\ ( m JIM B. ENGLE, Director, Community Services J.> ;~~;~':::~' • \ ----- APPROVE EXTENSION OF BOLSA CHICA ST ATE BEACH~--., OPERATING AGREEMENT Statement of Issue, Funding Source, Recommended Action, Alternative Action(s), Analysis, Environmental Status, Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: There is a need for City Council to approve exercising the city's option to extend the 1986 Bolsa Chica State Beach Agreement between the city and the State of California for an additional twenty-year term until November 30, 2026. !Funding Source: NA Recommended Action: Approve exercising the city's option granted in the 1986 Bolsa Chica State Beach Operating Agreement between the city and the State of California to extend the term for a period of twenty years from November 30, 2006 to November 30, 2026, and authorize staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature to communicate the option to the State Department of Parks and Recreation. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve exercising the city's extension of term option for the State Beach Operating Agreement, and return the area from the municipal pier to Seapoint Drive to the state for its control and operation after November 2006. Analysis: In December 1986, the city entered into an agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for the control and operation of a portion of Balsa Chica State Beach, which includes the area from the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier north to Seapoint Drive at Pacific Coast Highway. The city has invested millions of dollars in improvements to Blufftop Park and Pier Plaza, and has adopted a master plan for future improvements to the bluff area. This area is a very popular portion of the city beach which includes Pier Plaza and the northern Pier Plaza parking lot, Zack's Pier Plaza Beach Concession, the bicycle and recreational trail from the pier to Balsa Chica State Beach, Blufftop Park, the bluffs beach area, and Huntington Dog Beach. This area is of vital interest to the city to continue maintaining its image as both a local and international tourist destination. 49 kcQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACT1uN MEETING DATE: September 7, 2004 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CS04-024 Staff is recommending that Council exercise its option to extend its lease an additional twenty years. There is no cost to the city for the lease. Should the city receive more revenue from beach operations than its cost to provide services to this beach area, the state would share in 50 percent of that surplus revenue. During the past twenty years, revenue from the beach operations has only matched the city's cost and there have been no surplus revenues to share with the state. This is mainly due to the extensive beach improvements that the city has invested in this area of the beach. In summary, to maintain the city's control of this beach area and to insure the ability to offer events and maintain property values 1 staff is recommending approval of the option. In November 2026, the city will have the right to extend the agreement for another twenty years. Environmental Status: NA Attachment(s): Page Numb~r Nq. ~escriptioa City Clerk':s I 'I , ---------- RCA Author: JBE:cr G:\RCA\2004\04-024 Extension of Bolsa Chica State Beach Agreement.doc 8/5/200410:58 AM -2- 50 ATTACHMENT 1 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 Paragraph 7 1. 2. 8 3. 4. 9 5. ,. o. 10 7. 11! 8. 9. 10. 12 11. 12. 13 13. 14. 14 15. 16. 15 17. 18. 16 17 18 19 20 21 221 231 24 25 26' 27 COURT PAPER STATS 01' c:AL1'0ANIA STO. I 13 tllt:V. 9.12, es 34769 STAiE OF CALIFORNIA PEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION OPERATING AGREEMENT BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH Term . . . . . . . Use of Premises Concessions .. Fees . . . . . . I N D E X . . . . . . . . . . . . . Annual Reports ....... . Beach Erosion Control Construction of Improvements .. Tit 1 e . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eminent Domain . . .. . Hold Harmless ....... . Assignment . . . . .. Notices Termination .... . Real Property Acquisition ... . Nondiscrimination ....... . Limitation ........ . Paragraph Titles ......... . Contracts in Counterparts Signatures ....... . Exhibit(s) ........ . Page 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 8 a .; 11 11 11 11 12 12 52 1 2 3 OPERATING AGREEMENT ~ i llEC .........,. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1st day of October, 1986, 4 and between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting through the Department of Parks 5 and Recreation, hereinafter called "STATE", and the City of Huntington Beach, 6 a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter called "CITY"; 7 8 9 10 W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, STATE has acquired for park and recreational purposes 11 certain real property hereinafter described, known as a portion of Balsa Chica 12 State Beach and has jurisdiction thereof; and 13 14! Pursuant to the provisions of Section 5080.30 et seq. of the Pub1ic 15 Resources Code of the State of California, STATE may enter into contracts with 16 political subdivisions of the State of California for the care, maintenance, 17 and control, for the purposes of the State Park System, of lands under the 18 juri sd i cti on of STATE; and 19 20 STATE and CITY desire to enter into an agreement to provide for such 21 care, maintenance, and control of Balsa Chica State Beach, a description of 22 which is attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and 11 811 and incorporated herein by 23 this reference. 24 25 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter 26 contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 27 :::CURT PAPER STATIE OP CAt.lPOIINIA STD. 113 (REV. 8-72> 85 34769 I I 53 l 1. Tenn: CITY shall be responsible for a period beginning on the 2 date first above appearing and ending twenty years from said date, with an 3 additional twenty-year option at the CITY'S option provided that CITY exercise 4 such option not later than one year prior to the end of the initial 20-year 5 tenn. During said period, CITY shall pay all costs of developing, 6 maintaining, controlling, and operating said property for said purposes and 7 STATE shall not, during said period, be liable for the cost of said 8 development, maintenance, control, or operation. Nothing herein shall 9 preclude CITY from receiving grants for such purposes to the full extent 10 otherwise permitted by law. 11 12 An express condition subsequent to this agreement is that the 13 recreation policies 4.2.2 Coastal Recreation of the Recreation Element of the I 14l 11 CITY 1 S General Plan 11 May 1984 and the project plan for "Pierside Village 11 I 15 Huntington Beach, California by Bryant Morris Development_;;• Phase II sheets 13 as Exhilit "D" 't r'--'-f"........., 16 through 15 (both documents attached hereto/and made part of this contract) for 17 the demised premises shall be submitted for approval by the State Department 18 of Parks and Recreation as specified in Paragraph 7 of this agreement. 19 Failure of the Department of Parks and Recreation to approve the development 20 plan listed above may rpult in tennination of this agreement by the CITY, _pursuant to "',r----/''\../'"' 21 fol10•,-1ing Paragraph 13b, Page 9. 22 23 2. Use of Premises: While this agreement is in force and effect, 24 said property shall be accessible and subject to the use and enjoyment of all 25 citizens of the State of California, and all other persons entitled to use and 26 enjoy the same, subject, however, in the manner of such use and enjoyment to 27 the control of CITY in conformity with this agreement. CITY may adopt rules COURT PAPER llTATII: 01' CAL.IPORNIA STD. 113 <R&:V. 8°72> 35 34769 2 54 1 and regulations, including hours of operation, for the use and enjoyment of 2 said property. Any such rules and regulations adopted by CITY shall conform 3 to and be consistent with the rules and regulations adopted by STATE and 4 generally applicable to the State Park System, including said property. Said 5 property shall not be used for any other purpose than the purpose herein 6 enumerated. 7 8 3. Concessions: Subject to prior approval in writing by STATE, 9 CITY may grant concessions in or upon said property consistent with the use by 10 the general public thereof for park and recreational purposes. The rights of 11 the public to the use and enjoyment of said property shall thereupon be 12 1 imited by such concession agreements. Al 1 such concessions shall be granted 13 in substantial compliance with Public ResourcJt Code Section 5080.20, 5080.33 State I-ii--' /1-;;·-- 14 and 5080.34, and the applicable/general plan for the respective park unit. 15 16 The concession contract between the State of California and 17 Donald Tosh, Ted E. Christensen, and Tom A. Lewis for parking lot operation 18 and food and beverages and rentals is attached hereto and is marked 19 Exhibit 11 C11 which by reference is incorporated herein for all purposes. CITY assignment of such concession agreement only to the extent of 20 agrees to acceptlcm+y the parking lot,--a-M food, beveraged6dental operation, 21 known as 11 Sunnys 11 subject to the terms of the existing contract. STATE shall retain the _right to such agreement (E~,ibit C) covering that portion west of 22 the demised premises herein. i,i;v--~ 23 4. Fees: Any charges, fees, or collections made by CITY for 24 services, benefits, or accommodations to the general public shall be limited 25 to actual needs for maintenance, control and operation and for improvements 26 and development of said property to provide needed additional facilities, and 27 that commercialization for profit shall not be engaged in by CITY. ::oURT PAPER STAT'IE OJI CA&.1JJORHIA STO. 113 IRltV. 8,721 85 34769 3 55 l 5. Annual Reports: All income received and all expenditures made 2 by the CITY in relation to concessions, special services, and all other 3 matters incident to the development, maintenance, control, and operation for 4 the State Beach or portion thereof subject of this agreement shall be reported 5 annually to the STATE. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5080.32, all 6 revenues received from lands subject to this agreement shall be expended only 7 for the care, maintenance, operation, administration, improvement, or 8 development of the State Beach and any other state recreational areas. Such 9 annual report shall be made for the annual period commencing on July 1 and 10 terminating June 30 and shall be filed with STATE not later than December 1 of 11 each year. The first report hereunder shall be filed by CITY not later than 12 December 1, 1987, and shall cover the periods beginning on July 1, 1986 and 13 terminating June 30, 1987. 14 15 The report shall include a reasonable annual estimate of the number 16 of visitors to the State Beach or portion thereof described on 17 Exhibits A and B, as well as the number of vehicles. 18 19 "Revenue" herein shall be defined so as not to include indirect 20 revenue such as sales tax, possessory interest tax, etc. 21 22 The books, records, and accounts kept by CITY applying to the 23 operation of the State Beach shall at all reasonable times be open for audit 24 or inspection by STATE. 25 26 6. Beach Erosion Control: It is further agreed and understood 27 between the parties hereto that any development, beach erosion control, or ::OURT PAPER STA.TE OP' CALIP'ORNIA STO. 113 !REV. s.721 85 34769 4 56 1 protection work which may be undertaken by STATE or the United States of 2 America, along or on said property, shall not, in any way, be construed as 3 constituting a termination of this agreement or in any way affecting same. 4 5 STATE shall have the right to enter into agreements for such work 6 during the term hereof and to go upon said property or to authorize any 7 person, firm, or corporation to go upon said property for the purpose of such 8 construction, beach erosion protection or control work, or the doing of other 9 public work for the improvement or development of said property, provided that 10 STATE shall give CITY 90-day written notice of its intention to do any of the 11 work herein mentioned before such work is undertaken. 12 13 7. Construction of Improvements: CITY may, by its own forces or 14 by contract, undertake projects for the development, construction, or 15 improvement to said property. Plans and specjlications for any such project St ate -l '1--~,.,..,__.._ 1 6 shall be submitted to STATE as a/General Plan amendment for approval. No such 17 project shal 1 be commen~ed by CITY'S own forces or contracts awarded prior to 18 STATE a pprova 1 . 19 20 STATE has the right to disapprove such plans and specificatio_2,s and of !jUbmittal I. ft---'".:rL.-. 21 shall notify the CITY of its decision within 90 days/. Such development, 22 construction, or improve~t shall be in accordance with 5080.31 P.R.C. and STATE' s i 'Iv-J'v"-- 23 with the/general plan for the respective unit and any amendment thereof shall 24 be subject to prior approval in writing by STATE. 25 26 Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5080.3l(b) P.R.C. 27 general plan shall be prepared by the CITY and shall be approved by the COURT PAPER STAT1r OP' CALIPORNIA STD. 113 IAEV. 8•721 85 34769 5 57 1 California State Park and Recreation Commission. 2 3 8. Title: Improvements erected on said property by CITY shall, 4 upon completion, become a part of the reality and title to said improvements 5 shall vest in STATE upon termination of this agreement or any extension 6 thereof. Any removal authorized shall be made without damage to adjacent 7 improvements and if adjacent improvements are damaged, CITY shall reimburse 8 STATE therefore or shall repair the improvement so damaged at the option of i 9 STATE. After removal, the premises shall be left free and clear of all debr~s lO and in a condition reasonably similar to the present condition of said 11 property. 12 13 CITY shall not, without prior written approval of STATE, remove, 1 14 move, demolish, or alter in any manner, any improvements, natural features, or i 15 accretions existing on said property on the effective date of this agreement\ 16 or subsequently occurring, except when engaged in the protection of public ahct I 17 private lands and waters from stonns, floods, high tides, fire (all natural 18 disasters), during a period of natural disaster or emergency declared by the 19 Governor of California or the President of the United States. 20 21 9. Eminent Domain: If said property or portion thereof is taken 22 by proceedings in eminent domain, STATE shall receive the entire award for 23 such taking except that CITY shall receive out of said award the fair marke 24 value of any improvements than existing and constructed by CITY (other than' I 25 improvements erected with funds realized through income from said property) bn ! I 26 said property as said fair market value may be determined by said proceeding~ 27 taking into consideration the terms of this instrument. i ::CURT PAPER STATII: 01' CALIPORNIA sro. I 13 (RIEV. 8-72) 85 34769 6 58 l 10. Hold Harmless: CITY hereby waives all claims and recourse 2 against the STATE including the right to contribution for loss or damage to 3 persons or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected \'lith 4 or incident to this agreement except claims arising from the concurrent or 5 sole negligence of STATE, its officers, agents, and employees. 6 7 CITY shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend STATE, its officers, 8 agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, 9 expenses, or liability costs arising out of the acquisition, development, t 10 cons-ruction, operation, or maintenance of said property described herein which 11 claims, demands, or causes of action arise under Government Code Section 895.2 12 or otherwise except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sole 13 negligence of STATE, its officers, agents, or employees. 14 15 In the event STATE is named as co-defendant under the provisions of 1 6 the Government Code Sections 895 et seq., the CITY shall notify STATE of such 17 fact and shall represent STATE in such legal action unless STATE undertakes to 18 represent itself as co-defendant in such legal action in which event STATE 1 9 shall bear its own litigation costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. 20 21 In the event judgment is entered against the STATE and CITY because 22 of the concurrent negligence of STATE and CITY, their officers, agents, or 23 employees, an apportionment of liability to pay such judgment shall be made by 2 4 a court of competent jurisdiction. Neither party shall request a jury 25 apportionment. 26 27 COURT PAPER STATII: OP' c:ALIP'OAHIA STC. 113 <R&:V. 8°72> !!5 34769 7 59 l 11. Assignment: This agreement shall not, nor shall any interest 2 therein or thereunder, be assigned, mortgaged, hypothecated, or transferred 3 either by CITY or by operation of law, nor shall CITY let or sublet, or grant 4 any licenses or permits with respect to the use and occupancy of said property 5 or any portion thereof, without the written consent of STATE first had and 6 obtained. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7 8 12. Notices: Notices or reports desired or required to be given 9 hereunder or under any law now or hereafter in effect may, at the option of lO the party giving same, be given by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope 11 addressed to the party for whom intended and by depositing said envelopes, 12 with postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested, in the United 13 States Post Office or any substation thereof. 14 15 In the event such notice is being given to the CITY, such notice and 1 6 the envelope containing the same shall be addressed to the City Council of the 17 City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, 18 California 92648, or such other place as may hereafter be designated in 19 writing by or on behalf of CITY; and in the event that said notice being sent 20 to STATE, said notice and the envelope containing the same shall be addressed 21 to the 0epart'llent of Parks and Recreation, 18221 Enterprise Lane, 22 Huntington Beach, California 92648 and at P.O. Box 942896, Sacramento, 23 California 94296-0001. 24 25 26 27 COURT PAPER STATE OP' CAl.ll'OR.NIA STD.113 (Rl!:V. 8-72> 8 85 34769 60 l 2 3 13. Tennination: a. STATE reserves the unqualified right to tenninate this 4 agreement by giving CITY one (1) year's written notice of the effective date 5 of such tennination. STATE further may tenninate this agreement for material 6 breach by CITY of any of the provisions hereof. The CITY shall be given not 7 less than ninety (90) days to cure any and all breaches hereunder. 8 9 b. CITY reserves the unqualified right to terminate this 10 agreement by giving STATE one (1) year's written notice of the effective date 11 of such termination. CITY further may terminate this agreement for breach by 12 STATE of any of the provisions hereof. 13 14' c. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this contract and 15 in addition to any other remedy available to STATE, STATE sha11 have the 16 option to terminate the contract and to pay CITY the then depreciated cost of 17 the facilities placed, created, or payment (buy-out) shall a_pp✓~ in 1 8 Section 13( a) above. ~ ,_/._,,,...- 19 d. It is expressly developed by CITY on the premises. Such the event of termination pursuant to understood that the paragraph "c" does not 20 apply to the situation where the STATE may terminate this contract for any 21 material breach on the part of the CITY. Where there has been a breach on the 22 part of CITY, under any terms of this contract, the STATE shall not be 23 obligated to pay CITY before or after taking possession of the premises so 24 long as CITY has not cured said breach within ninety (90) days after written 25 notice ·thereof. 26 27 COURT PAPER STATE OP' CAl.lP'ORNIA STD. 113 !RCV. 8°721 85 34769 9 61 1 e . For the purpose "c" -(.,<I--J!_ of th-ts-paragraptv', such facilities shall . 2 be deemed to be the improvements which CITY is expressly required to make 3 hereunder or later adds, exclusive of trade fixtures, equipment, and any 4 personal property. The cost of such facilities for the purposes of this 5 paragraph shall be computed in the following manner: 6 7 f. Upon com pl eti on of improvements, or within thirty ( 30) 8 days of opening for public use, whichever is earlier, CITY will submit 9 verified cost statements accompanied by substantiating invoices and bills of 10 labor, material, or any other reasonable construction costs, to STATE. After 11 such statements, invoices, and bills have been examined by STATE, STATE wil1 12 in its sole discretion establish in a reasonable and fair manner the cost of 13 improvements. In the event costs are not filed by CITY within the period 14 above provided, STATE shall estimate said cost and serve the same on CITY in 15 the manner provided herein. STATE'S estimate shall become final thirty (30) 16 days after service thereof. 17 18 g. The amount to be paid as the then depreciated cost of the "c" €,~ -.--J'. 1 9 facilities in the event of termination under t-lri-5--paragrap~shall be i(a'sect on 20 a capital recovery schedule detennined by dividing the initial investment by 2l the number of whole years remaining in the agreement period or any extension 22 thereof at the time of invest~ent, multiplied by the remaining years. The 23 initial investment shall be the actual cost of all improvements, less any 24 donations, contributions, or fees received by CITY for tne construction of 25 said improvements. 26 27 COURT PAPEFt STATU: OF CAl.ll'ORNIA STC. 113 tREV. 8°72> 85 34769 10 62 s 1 In the event of breach, bankruptcy, in{olvency, abandonment, or the 2 contract is terminated at CITY's request, the buy-out provisions contained 3 herein are not to be considered as an obligation of the STATE. 4 5 The buy_ cut provisions i'('-"' k -TI\~.p.a+-~graph shall only be operative when funds required by STATE 6 for such buy-out are obtained through appropriation by the Legislature and 7 through the nonnal budgeting process of the STATE. 8 9 14. Real Property Acquisition: It is understood and agreed by the 10 parties hereto, that all applications for real property rights, appurtenant to 11 the real properties herein described, shall be made in the name of and on 12 behalf of STATE, and shall be subject to the prior approval in writing of 13 STATE. 14 15 15. Nondiscrimination: Pursuant to Public Resources Code 16 Section 5080.34, this agreement prohibits, and every contract for a concession 17 on iands that are subject to this operating agreement shall expressly 18 prohibit, discrimination against any person because of race, color, religion, 19 sex , mar it a 1 status , 20 Standard Form 17 A is national origin, or ancestry of that person. 1 ncorpo rated herein , as Exhibit "E" :X" Attached 21 22 15. Limitation: This operating agreement is subject to all valid 23 and existing contracts, leases, licenses, encumbrances, and claims of title 24 which may affect said property. 25 26 17. Paragraph Titles: The paragraph titles in this contract are 27 inserted only as a matter of convenience and for reference, and in no way COURT PAPER STAT111 Oft CALIP'ORNIA $TO. 113 1IHV. 9.721 85 347159 11 63 l define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this contract or in any way 2 affect this contract. 3 4 18. Contracts in Counterparts: This contract is executed in 5 counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original. 6 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this instrument upon 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 the date first hereinabove appearing. Attest: ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk Y:~a.~ Deputy City Clerk Department of General Services BY APPRO~fD l~~ '"!>' , O!UGlNAI. -.,~l-< •• ~. r iJ,1.A..'4 i. W£,'lC:i;,;,:;: 27 Y-5791X Aa't. Chief Couu STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ~~L_ Mayor r Approved as to Form: [J&L-◄• City Attorney Initiated and Approved: Director of Community Services COURT PAPER STATD: 01' CAI.IPORNIA ST0.113 (FIS:V.9•721 85 34769 12 64 ' : • .I I. • 0 • If • o, l EXHIBIT 0 A" 2 3 The real properties owned by the state of California, the 4 control, care, and maintenance of.which are by the attached lease s agreement given over to the City of Huntin~on Beach, shall be 6 known as ''State Parks", and are identified as follows: 7 ---- 8 BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH 9 Deed from Huntington to Pacific .Corporation recorded 10 grant deed on May 23, 1974 as Doc. 11151 O.R. 556. 11 "That portion of Balsa Chica State Beach that was 12 within the boundaries of the City of Huntington Beach on May 23, 13 1974.as described in the above mentioned deed." 65 ., Bolsa Chica State Beach Lower Bluff Goldenwest CITY OF • Pier HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA I Huntington City Beach ........ - Huntington State Beach EXHIBIT "B" ----·---:..' .. _J i' I 66 -REQUE&.) FOR CITY COUNCl~\CTION Date October 23, 1986 Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: The Honorable Mayor and City Council /4,,A Charles W. Thompsont City Admir.istrat~ " Melvin M. Bowman t Directort Community Service OPERATING "AGREEMENT FOR BOLSA ··c11ICA STAT Consistent with Council Policy? [ ,! Yes Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE The State Department of Parks and Recreation has prepared a new agreement for city operation of a portion of the Bolsa Chica State Beach. RECOMMENDATION Approve the new operating agreement with the State of California for operation of a portion of the Bolsa Chica State Beach to commence November 1, 1986. and authorize Mayor to execute same. ANALYSIS At its August 4, 1986 meeting, City Council approved the operating agreement with the State of California for city operation of that portion of the Bolsa Chica State Beach fror.1 the pier north to the westerly city limits. When the agreement went to the state for execution, a state representative felt that some items in the agreement should be more clearly defined, specifically, the can cellation procedure if the city's development plans and specifications ,,,.-ere not approved by the state, and the exact location of the parking lot and concession stand covered by the agreement. FUNDING SOURCE Hone. ALTERN.ATIVE ACTIONS l. rJegotiate with state to acquire beach through fee simple title. 2. Do not enter into a long term lease agreement with the state. ATTACHMENT Operating Agreement for Bolsa Chica State Beach MMB:cs PIO 4184 67 To u "-,' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Charles W. Thompson City Administrator ax Bowman Director, Community Services Subject City Operation of Bolsa Chica State Beach Date January 13, 1987 The operating agreement with the State Department of Parks and Recreation for a portion of the Bolsa Chica State Beach has been executed by the state. The city will be taking over operation of the beach from the pier north to the westerly city limits, approximately 2.3 miles, effective Febr-uary 1, 1987. MMB:cs cc: Department Heads 68 I ~ ~ • -• REQUES"°"FOR CITY COUNClh.ACTION %(1:i~ -J-C,;rw-Py:t;,- Date Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council~ Charles W. Thompson, City Administr;;&/'Jtl/, Melvin M. Bowman, Director, Co:nmunity Servic Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: OPERATING AGREEMENT CHICA STATE BEACH Consistent with Council Policy? [ l Yes STATEMENT OF ISSUE There is a need for the city to acquire control of the beachfront between the pier and the west city limits in order to further implement the goals and objec tives of the downtown specific and main pier redevelopment plans. RECOMMENDATION Approve the agreement with the State of California for operation of Bolsa Chica State Park to commence October 1, 1986; authorize Mayor to execute same; and allocate $~7,200 from the unappropriated fund balance for personnel and operating expenses for FY86/87. ANALYSIS The State Parks and Recreation Department has submitted a proposed agreement for the care, maintenance and operation of state beach property north of the municipal pier to the west city limits. Tt-.e agreement is for a period of twenty years with a twenty year option. The city would be given control of this property for recreational and park purposes. The city would pay for the development, maintenance and operation of the area and receive all direct revenue therefrom. Any development, construction or improvements to this property would be subject to prior written approval of the state. Over the past several years, with the support of State Parks and Recreation and the assistance of the State Coastal Conservancy, the city has made great strides in the revitalization of this under c.eveloped and under utilized section of state beach. These improvements were part of the implementation efforts of the city's downtown specific and main pier redevelopment plans. City jurisdic tion and control of the beach north of the pier are critical to the further implementation of the goals and objectives c,f these adopted plans. Because of the city's logistical capabilities, this operational change could be accomplished quickly and· cost effectively. Annual personnel and operating expenses are estimated to be $165,000 ( recurrent personnel· $133,000; operating $32,000), which would be offset by concession revenue, tax increments from the redevelopment agency and sales tax. A city operated beach between the pier and the west city limits would be bene ficial to all partie·s. Most importantly, the safety of the public would be f•IO 4184 .. 69 Page 15 -Council Minutes -8/4/86 On motion by MacAllister, second Kelly, Council adopted Resolution No. 5688 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandie, Bailey, Green, Thomas None Finley APPROVED CPERATING AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH The City Clerk presented a communication from the Community Services Director transmitting an Operating Agreement between the City and State of California for the beachfront between the pier and the west city limits in order to fur ther implement the goals and objectives of the Downtown Specific and Main Pier Redevelopment Plane. Exhibits A-C on file in the City Clerk's Office~ • Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to approve and authorize e ,ecution of the agreement between the State and City for operation of Bolsa Chica Sta.tlo Park to commence October 1, 1986 and approve an allocation of $47,200 from the unappropriated fund balance for per sonnel and opera ting e >:pens es for FY 1986--8 7. The motion . 1'!arried by the fol-'' lowing roll call vote:: 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Kelly, MacAllister, Bailey, Green, Thomas Mandie Finley ORDINANCE NO 2855 -CONTINUED TO 8/18/86 -OVERSIZED VEHICLE PARKING R.EQJLA TIONS -COUNCILMAN THOMAS TO ASSIST STAFF IN DRAFTING ALTERNATE ORDINANCE The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2855 for Council consideration -"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGI'ON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGI'ON BEACH MUNI CIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.44.060 "OVERSIZED VEHICLE PARKING REGULA TIONS!" Discussion was held regarding state law as it pertains to mandating that over wide or. oversized vehicles parking on arteria:t highways dur.ing certain hours of the day. Councilman Thomas stated he would not vote on Ordinance No. 2855 because of a possible conflict of interest. On motion by MacAllister, second Green, Council continued c.onsiderat:l.on of Ordinance No. 2855 to August 18, 1986 to allow staff time to draft an alter nate ordinance for Council to compare with this proposed ordinance. The motion carried by the followi.ng roll call vote: AYES: NOES: NOT VOTING: ABSENT: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandie, Ba:!.ley, Green None Thomas Finley ' .. , ·.• .. ·: . . ' .. . '_; 1 '. 70 u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION • To C RLES \'l. THOr,iPSON From ROBERT J. FRANZ City dministrator S b·ect APPROP lATJON FOR CITY u ! OPERATION\OF BOLSA CHICA ST ATE PARK, FIS 86-34 Date Deputy 7 Administrator JULY 2~, 1986 As requested under the outhorit of Resolution 4832, .e Fiscal Impact Report has been p:-cpared and submitted relative ta:=th~ City's contemplated expense for maintaining and operating the Bolsa .Chica Stat~-fuk commencing 1 10/01/86. As anticipated by the requesting entity, en appropriation of $ .. ,200 v:o7uld be adequate for the remainder or the current fiscal year. An affirmative response by the City Coun • ,would reduce the balance or the City's unaudited, unappropriated General Fund to 2 748. • . Adrr. inistra th·e Ser RJF:AR:skd 26i6j 71 c:cun-Fol.PE:!! 2! i l si I I 41 I i 51 Paragraph I 6i l. 7: 2. 8, 10; 15 16; 17 le: 19. 20 21 25= 26 27 3. ,. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. l•L 15. 16. 17. 18. ....... ~.:' 01"' C.A.l•Ollllt1• t.~:: !-:.:: 11['1. ""~= u u STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION OPERATING AGREEMENT BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH Term . . . . . . Use of Premises Concessions .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Annual Reports ............ . Beach Erosion Control ........ . Construction of Improvements . . . . . . . Title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eminent Domain ............ . Hold Harmless . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·Assignment .............. . Notices .. ; ............ . Termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real Property Acquisition ...... . Nondiscrimination .......... . Limitation. . . . . . . . . ... . Paragraph Titles ........... . _ Contracts in Counterparts ...... . Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit(s) .............. . 2 2 3 ' ' 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 12 13 13 13 13 1, .. 72 V u ~ ~ CITY OF HUNTIIIGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To m.Ml'"GT()tj tUCH CHARLES W. THOMPSON City Administrator • Subject APPROPRIATION FOR CITY OPERATIONS OF BOLSA CHICA STATE PARK, FIS 86-34 From ROBERT J. FRANZ Deputy City Administrator Date JULY 25, 1986 As requested under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Report has been prepared and submitted relative to the City's contemplated expense for maintaining and operating the Bolsa Chica State Park commencing 10/01/86. As anticipated by the regucsting entity, an appropriation of $47,200 would be adequate for the remainder of the current fiscal year. An affirmative response by the City Council "Nould reduce the balance of the City's unaudited, unappropriated General Fund to $2,002,748. RJF:AR:.skd 2676j strator Administrative erviccs Depar ment 73 r . .. u • REQUEST FOR CITY COU~CIL ACTION July 21, 1986 OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH enhanced by the continuity of lifeguard, maintenance and law enforcement services throughout this densely populated and active beachfront in the "heart of the city." The year-round lifeguard tover on the pier provides the highest level of lifeguard observational service to thi.s area. City beach and land scaping services could easily be expanded to include this beach area. The city is presently maintaining the "bluff top landscaped area." The city police department would also be very effective in patroling the area, reducing criminal activity by increased surveillance {24-hour patrol, communications center, and helicopters.} Control of the area would also allow the city to propose improve ments and future developments equally on both sides of the pier. This approach will be more economical and help the city establish a strong visitor attracting mode in the downtown. The aerial photo (Exhibit .,A") and redevelopment map (Exhibit "B 11 ) illustrate how vital this area is to the future planning of the city and present a clear picture of the operational relationship between the beach areas north and south of the pier. City and state park employees are in support of this agreement. No displacer:ient of permanent state employees would occur. The city would also be amenable to working with the state to absorb any recurrent positions that would be affected by this agreement. FUNDING SOURCE Unappropriated General Fund Balance ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Negotiate with state to acquire beach area through fee simple title. 2. Negotiate with state for a longer term operating agreement. 3. Advise state that the city is not interested in operating this beach area. A TT ACH~ENTS financial Impact Statement Agreement Aerial photo (Exhibit "A") Rerlevelopment map (Exhibit "B") MMB:cs 74 .. . . ..... I City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALI FOR NIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR January 9, 1987 Mr. Tom S. Miller Superintendent Orange Coast District State Department of Parks and Recreation 18331 Enterprise Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92.6.GS Dear Mr. Miller: Re: Operating Agreement for Bolsa Chica State Beach It is the city's understanding that· the intent of the language contained in subject agreement Section 13, Termination, Oines 15, 16 and 17 of page 9) is that the city would be reimbursed for the cost of facilities placed, created or developed by the city on the premises with funds other than those realized through income derived from the operation of said property. This is the same concept as referred to in subject agreement Section 9, Eminent Domain, Oines 22, 23, 24 and 25 of page 6). CHARLES W. THOMPSON City Administrator CWT:cs cc: Melvin M. Bowman, Dire::tor, Community Services Telephone (714) 536-5202 RECE;JVED JArJ 1 2 !997 Economic c.. h~.,.; .. 1foin Dept, ~, P!'r~, '-Re•rP(Yfiqn 75 • '· ' (6. . ~ REQUE~Y FOR CITY COUNCi't- 1 ACTION Date February 13, 1984 Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charle~ W. Thompson, City A~mini rato 1 --L2 _-..-- Prepare~ by: Melvin M. Bowman, Acting Director, Community Servi~s J1f-~ Subject: CITY TAKEOVER OF HUNTINGTON ASD BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES~ Chi %.; lll11lt_1> s -I -StA---f-f--fo "'1r-ijr,~ttr"tf."½. "f::t ~- statement of Issue. Recommendation. Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE The State Department of Parks and Recreation has proposed that the city assume total operational responsibility for Huntington and Bolsa Chica State Beaches. RECOMMENDATION Direct City Administrator to negotiate with state for a final operating agree ment for Huntington and Bolsa Chica State Beaches to become effective May 1, 1984, if feasible, and an alternate date of January 1, 1985. ANALYSIS The City Council at its January 3, 1964 meeting adopted Resolution No. 5345 authorizing staff to enter into negotiations with the state for the operation and management of state beaches within the city limits. The advantages of city operation and management of state beaches fall into three categories: PIO 4/81 Safety: City police department could be very effective in patrolling the beaches and reducing criminal activity by increased surveillance. (Twenty-four hour patrol, communication center and helicopters.) There are remote areas along Bolsa Chica State Beach where crime continues to be a problem. The state has limited enforcement capa bility, no jail and must rely on ccunty sheriff for backup. The city has an existing police force, jail nnd the necessary backup to provide effective enforcement. • Water safety would also benefit from city management since the city has an established marine safety division which could be expanded to include managing the state beach. Maintenance: City beach ma intenancc division and parks, tree and landscaping division perform similar functions throughout the city. Local maintenance management means a closer span of control and elimination of costly duplication. Using the city's landscape expertise translates to better utilization of species adapted to the local climate and environment, and more cost effective landscape maintenance proce dures. The existing organizational capabilities could be easily expanded to manage the additional maintenance tasks. 76 Request for City Council Action Subj: CITY TAKEOVER OF HUNTINGTON J\MD BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES February 13, 19Sl Page Two Economics: Cost-cutting advantages are available by concise use or resources under a proven management system and elimination of costly overlap and duplication of service that exists "1ith parallel systems. The city already has an effective, experienced management structure. Additional personnel can be accomrr.odated without additional super vision. This will result in a cost-effective operation. The city has expertise in beach management, demonstrated by an extremely well-run and cost effective beach. This management structure can be expanded to include the state beaches which are presently operated at a deficit. lt is the city's projection through cost saving management of reducing duplication of service that the state beaches will be self supporting. Early this month, city staff met with state representatives and the following items were agreed upon by both parties: -Operation of state beaches would be under an opera ting agreement, not a transfer of property or ownership; -No state subsidy would be involved; however, the city would assume all facilities and improvements as constructed including Phase 11 developmerit when completed; -Pending lawsuits against the state which occurred before the effective date of the operating agreement would rer:iatn responsibility of state. Expenses include allocation of funds to cover costs of liability insurance; -Concession agreements would be transferred to city with city receiving rental revenue: Operator on Bolsa Chica has 21 years remaining on 25 year agree ment; operator on Huntington has four years left on a five year agreement. -City would not be responsible for moving expenses of state employees affected by takeover; -Thirty-foot right-of-way from Pacific Coast Highway to newly built block wall at Huntington Sta tc Beach will not be part of operating agreement; ma tntenance for that area will remain state's responsi- bility: . -Capital improvements by city on state beaches will require state approval; -City has prerogative of charging reasonable fees for parking. special events, camping, etc.; -State beach names must remain the same; -Terms of operating agreement will be negotiated for no less than 25 years and no more than 50; -City has right to establish operating hours and laws at its dis cretion; -Two year cancellation clause by either party. 77 Request for City Council Action Subj: CITY TAKEOVER OF HUNTINGTON MID BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES February 13, 198& Page Three We have estimated total expenditures for FY84/85 at $2,6!.0,000 ( Exhibit C). Included in this expenditure is $87,000 for capital outlay aiuipment amor tized from three to twenty years (Exhibit D). We would be adding twenty three permanent employees with the takeover, twelve in public safety and eleven in maintenance and parking facility operations. In-negotiations with the state, we advised we would consider transferring any state employ ees who qualified for specific classifications. Estimated income for FY84/85 is $2,595,000. First year estimated deficit would be $45,000. The remaining four years of the five-year project, FY86 through FY89, show a slight increase each year for an overall pro jected program of $139,000 income over expenses (Exhibit A). A revenue breakdown ts shown in Exhibit B. FUNDING SOURCE General Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS l) Negotiate with state for operation of only one beach, rather than both; 2) Renegotiate to include state subsidy for operation of beaches, guaran teeing a cost effective program; 3) Discontinue negotiations and advise state that city is not interested in operating state beaches at this time. ATTACHMENTS Exhibits A through D. MMB:cs 78 .... .. . HUNTINGTON ANO BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES ESTIMATED EXPENSES ANO REVENUES JULY 12 1984 -JUNE 30 2 1989 E X P E N S E S 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 TOTAL Personnel & ( Operating $2.,553,000 $2,681,000 $2,814,000 $2,955,000 $3,103,000 $14,106,000 Capital Outlay 87,000 87,000 89,000 91,000 93,000 447,000 TOTAL $2,640,000 $2,768,000 2,903,000 3,046,000 3,196,000 $14,553,000 I N C O M E 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 TOTAL Parking & Camping $2,370,000 $2,546,000 $2,723,000 $2,824,000 $3,098,000 $13,561,000 Oil & Gas Tax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 ( Concessions 25,000 25,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 131,000 TOTAL 2,595,000 2,771,000 2,949,000 3,051,000 3,326,000 14,692,000 (ncome Over Expenses ($45,000) $3,000 $46,000 $5,000 $130,000 $139,000 EXHIBlT .. A .. 79 ,.-'1 • rv (._,1 HUNTINGTON AND BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES R E V E N U E B R E A K O O W N Fiscal Year 1984-85 Day Use $3 year round $2,068,000 Camping $12 ... 105 days (300 spaces) 302,000 $ 2,370.000 1985-86 Day Use $4 surrmer weekends & holidays $ 816,000 Day Use $3 all other days 1,392,000 Camping $14 -105 days (300 spaces) 338 2 000 $ 2,546,000 1986-87 Day Use $4 sumner (105 days) $1,646,000 Day Use $3 all other days (260 days) 739,000 Camping $14 -105 days (300 spaces) 338 1000 $ 2,723,000 1987-88 Day Use $4 SU!lT,'\er (105 days) $1,716,000 Day Use $3 all other days (260 days) 766,000 Camping $\4 -\05 days (300 spaces) 342 1 000 $ 2,824,000 1988-89 Day Use $5 su111T1er weekends & hol;days $ 960,000 Day Use $4 all other days 1,775,000 Camping $16 -105 days (300 spaces) 363 1 000 $ 32 098 1 000 TOTAL $13,561,000 EXHIBIT 11 811 OlOSE/8 -2/13/84F 80 Personnel Beach Pol ice Public Works Operating_ Seach Police Public Works HUNTINGTON AND BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES JULY 1, 1984 -JU~E 30, 1985 E X P E N S E S $1,205,000 419,000 80,000 Sub-total $ 492,000 7,000 315,000 Liability Insurance 35,000 Sub-total *Capital Outlay Beach $ 70,000 Pol ice 17,000 Pub lie Works N/A Sub-total TOTAL * Amortized/itemized list attached. EXHIBIT 11 C11 OlOSE/2 -2/l3/84F $1,704,000 $ 849,000 $ 87,000 $2,640!000 81 1: \ ~ :-~ .. <v f-._tl HUNTINGTON ANO BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACHES C A P I T A l 0 U T l A Y A M O R T I Z A T I O N Unit Life Annual Number Cost Total Span Cost COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -BEACH DIVISION Beach Sanitizers 2 $41,000 S 82.000 20 $ 5,465 Tractors 6 50,0CO 300,000 20 15,000 Beach Rakes 4 3,000 12,000 20 600 Tennant Sweeper 2 34.000 68,000 10 6,800 Sidekick Broom 1 9,500 9,500 10 950 Dump Trucks 3 24,000 72,000 8 9,000 Pickup Trucks 8 11,000 88,000 8 11,000 Four Wheel Drive Pickup 2 12,500 25,000 8 3,125 Two Channel Radios 13 1,50) 19,500 10 1,950 Air Compressor 2 11, OJJ 22,000 10 2,200 C-J 7 Jeeps 5 12,000 60,000 8 7,500 Jeep Cherokees 2 16,000 32,000 8 4,000 Speaker/Siren Units 7 400 2,800 10 280 Light Bars 7 700 4,900 10 490 Resuscitators 7 600 4,200 10 420 Spinal Injury Splints 7 250 1,750 15 llS Manikins 2 1,500 3,000 10 300 Ordinance Signs 12 200 2,400 5 480 Desks 4 475 1,900 20 95 Executive Chairs 4 275 1,100 10 110 Typewriters 2 750 • 1,500 10 150 Filing Cabinets 2 200 400 20 20 $813,950 $70,050 POLICE DEPARTMENT Four Wheel Drive 2 $15,000 $30,000 5 $6,000 Pack Set Radios 10 2,000 20,000 10 2,000 . ATC Units 12 2,135 25 2600 3 8 2 530 i1s,600 $16,530 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENl NONE. EXHIBIT 11 0 11 0105E/3 -2/10/84 82 REobesr FOR CITY -""' 3fa sti,t; 1/ ~ COUNCIL ACTION , Submitted by J.W. Palin/Mary Lynn N::>rby D rt t Planning & IJXal coastal P.rogl'.a:n. epa men • Date Prepared January 4 19 79 -----=-------, -Backup Material Attached (EJ Yes D No Subject Huntington State Beach Development Plan City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: nf ~ -----------------0- Statement of Issue: City Staff from various departments have reviewed the Development Plan (July, 1978) which the California Oepartnent of Parks & Recreation has proposed for the further development of Huntington State Beach. A consensus statement defining suggestions by the City for improving the Plan has been sent directly to that State Agency. Previous efforts to have City preferences and input considered by the State have been frustrated and largely ignored. The aim is to have the City input included in a comprehensive beach plan. Recommendation: That Council adopt the attached resolution supporting Staff efforts to effect coordinative planning for tne State Beach facilities within the jurisdiction of the City and establishing the LCP-CAC as development monitor. Analysis: Representatives from the Department of Public Works, Planning, Harbors and Beach, Recreation and Parks, Fire, Police and Administration heard a presentation on August 10, 1978 by the California Department of Parks and Recreation -Development Division. The 16602 Development Plan for Huntington state Beach, dated July, 1978, was explained and discussed. Issues concerning capacities of beach and parking lots, facilities, parking, PCH, bike trail, transportation, pedestrian safety, recreational vehicles, signing, maintenance facilities and Least Tern habitat were discussed. several coastal concerns were also expressed as input to the plan. \P/Olf18 \ J, 83 RCA-LCP January 5, 1979 V • Page 2 Information about the State Beach plans had been requested by the Local Coastal Program Staff early in 1978 in order to include necessary City interfaces in the Coastal Plan. T~is portion of the coastal planninq had to be deferred until the State Plan was developed. The Local Coastal Program has a task of coordinating plans for projects within the coastal zone consistent with Coastal Act policies. Subsequent to the August 10 presentation, inter-department meetings were conducted to determine the City response to the plan features. Iterative drafts produced the points of discussion in the November 6, 1978 letter to Mr. Russell Cahill, Director of the California Department of Parks and Recreation. The input of the City Staff to·a state agency would be greatly enhanced. by the Resolution of support of the ·city Council. Continued efforts will no doubt be necessary to effect a final acceptable plan for this and also Balsa Chica State Beach. The support of the Council behind these efforts will facilitate the input to the State of the City's design preferences. Also the Local Coastal Program will be aided in its progress toward a coastal plan. The appointment of a monitor for this planning effort will serve to deleqate the responsibility for keeping track of the continuing process of plan development. An associated responsibility will be the review of the EIR for this project. The Local Coastal Program Citizen Advisory Committee is a logical group to assume this duty and it·is willinq to·1:1.o·so.·· - Funding Source: No funds are necessary. Alternative Actions: 1) Support the City developing and/or operating the beach as a contractor to the State. Respectfully submitted, \~- mes w. Palin cting Plannino Director JWP/MLN/dc Attachnent: Draft Resolution 84 ; -u City of Hu11tington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF TIIE CITY AD.\tlNISTRATOR. November 6, 1978 ~1r. Russell Cahill, Director California I'lcpartrnent of Parks & Recreation Sacramento, CA. Re: Huntington State Beach Development Plan --No. 16602 -July, 1978 Dear Ur. Cahill: 11nough this communication, I am confinning the oral communications r.1adc as feedback from the City Stnff to your Development Division on the Huntington Beach ncvclopmcnt Plan referenced above. Kc appreciate your Department's briefing of City Staff on the Plan on August 10 and receipt of infon:nl contr.cnts on November 6. The City particularly approves of the number of entrances provided for in this pl:i.n. l\'c feel these arc necessary to provide the public acccssibili ty to the beach resource, to relieve the congcHion at Beach Boulevard, and to nllow greater use of the entire beach area. Entrances at these four locations h:1.vc been requested previously by the City, and we apprecintc the provision in the plan for two new entrances immediately and the third entrance ilnd upgrade of Beach Boulevard in the Phase II. Althour.h the number and location of the beach entrances meet with the City's npprovnl, the design should he improved to r,rovi<lc for better traffic and pedestrian flows. 111c Beach Boulevard entrnncc particularly nce<ls coordination to effect improved circulation in conjunction with the City Beach entrance at th.1t same location. A concept drawing depicting certain improvements recomm ended by the City's engineers is enclosed with this letter. 111erc arc several issues concerning the State Beach development which the Cit)', through this letter, is requesting that you address. 111c fiml Plan ,,..hich the State adopts should include resolution of these issues. In the past fifteen years, the City has requested that its concerns be considered for the State Bc:1chcs in our jurisdiction. Many of these concerns arc reiterated again hc-re. Presently the City is preparing its Local Coastal Plan (LCP) \o."hich is m.1ndate<l to consider all activity occurring or likely to occur in its coastal zone. Coordinating the activj tics of the various agencies an<l in4ivi<luals ,\·ho arc Telep/Jone (714) 536-5201 85 . . . .. . 1 t I . till I ... ~ , ., 4 .,_t,l 1,.J 1...,,il • l'-!overnher 6, 1918 Page :l. u involved in the coast a L nrea to nssure the o\'eral l rcsul ting effect is in cor.ipl innce 1d th Coastnl Act policies is an LCP task. The items ir.1portnnt for local coastal planning arc included in this listing. 1. ttove the comfort stations hack into the s~md area. 111er will he nearer the beach lL'>crs there, will impede the traffic flow in the p;1rking lot less, :rnd will provide sp:1c.::c for adt1itional parking in the lot. Use the released .ue:is for ndJitional parking mid for .improved cntr.mce nrrnngements. A better balance then will be provided between beach capacity anc.l parking. 2. Provide t11rn-arounll area at the entrances l:lrge enough for buses. 111ese would be used for nuto drop-offs anc.1 bus route connections. 11wy 1,·oulcl relievt-P:tci fie Coast llighway of ac.kli tional trnffic flm,·s bccaw;e the traffic may return up the arterial reducing impact to Pacific Coast lliglr.,.ray. The southhouml hiJ!l11vay drop-off (turnouts) ns they arc depicted in the plan arc plnce<l in a position where pcdcstrfrns·r.1:1y he cnd;mgcrcd. 'l11is condition nt least could be corrected by rnov1 ng these turnouts farther from the comer nnd ncross from the parking lot rather than the traffic squeeze behind the concession stand. 3. \•.'c undcr~tnnd this plan to be based on .:. 100-foot right-of-way for Pacific Coast Highway. This is not compatible with the present p1;rns to incre:ise 4. the cnrringe capacity of POI h)" a wiuc11ing project requir.in~ a 120-foot r.ight-of-1,·ay for six Innes of trnffic ~nll th·o p:irking lnnes.* 111e de<lic:1tion of some 10 to 20 feet of the old Pacific Electric right-of-w:1y for this state highway project is requested. 'Ilic llcacl: Plan needs to consider and be compatible with the highway grading level planned. Of special concern is that the seaward-rrost lane or PO I be available for Jr.etcrcc.l p;irking to serve the short-tcnr: or transient visitors. 111c only acceptable altern:itivc would be a metered nrea within the beach parking area \\·hich would provc.Je this same service 24 hours per day. Include n metered parking area in the Huntington State Beach (;:m<l also Bolsa dlica State Park) to al low for early users. lllu1tington Beach has founcl these metered lots to be very successful on our beach. In lieu of the metered lots, the operation schc<lulc of the beach could be modified to provide ncccss for early users. 111ese users arc fishenncn, surfers, and heach walkers who prefer to use the beach at <la\,11 and thereafter. If the p:lrking lots nrc closed and locked, these early users will be excluc.lc<l • It is proposed that the parking lots be unlocked at <lawn and entry to the hca.ch be unimpedctl. If no fees were required until 9:00 a..m., for example, the p..1rki11g iot nttcndants h'ould not he required at the e~irly hour. The Cali forni n r.oas ta.1 Act of E)7(l requires increased puhlic :1ccess. The present pl:umcd development of the bench could actu.11ly c.lccrcasc existing access cspccin11r for this specific user group, without a provision for early- hour usage. ·*r-:otc: llmtin~ton Beach conunents to the EIR of the previous plan indicated at.that time (Sept. 7, 1977) that 120 1 right-of-way would be minimally required • 86 .. . • l ......... ,-.\. •• ,.·.,••• It I••--•\..• ......... Novcmhcr 6, H>78 · Page 3. U S. Provision needs to he ma<lc at some of the entrances for charter buses to-enter the parking areas. 6. A statement should Ile inclu<lc<l in the J:IR th.1t I.cast Terns, although they nc~t in the protected :::01_1tl area, rcc<l in the &mta An.1 Hivcr :m<l on the h'Ct],mlls to the north :icross l'ilci fk Co:ist rni.:hw;1y. (Jlcvclopiiicnt on iliat property l'.oui"JnTicct thi::; cncl,mgcrc<l species.) ·11111s the alternative of ncqt1isition of that property should be consi<lcrc<l. 7. Before the construction begins, review the iln:hit<.'Ctural 1:a)'lHtt or all bui l<lings and review the planting schedules un<l landscape pl.ms with City staff to insure compatibility with local <lesign nn<l Jan<lscaping stanll:in.ls :ind to ~ccurc il<lvicc on species compatible with the local beach ecology. ·n,c 1::imlscnping ~hould be planned to inprovc the visua1 effects of the parking areas ns seen from Paci fie Coast f ligln:ay. The City's t'xpcr icn,c has sho\,n th.it adJitional nttC'ntion to proper pl~mting mcthoJs an<l soil improvement wi 11 be cost effective and prevent high pl~t loss. 8. Use no fencing, nloni~ Pacific C.oast flighway within the C:ity limits except tlia t 1d1ich j !-in the fonn of railings to protect the pul>lic from extreme changes in elevation. /\. sense o[ frccdora for the people \.Jho use the beach wi 11 he provided. Fencing, within the park used to di rcct :rn<l control mo\'c ment of people ~hould be of a material th.-1t. is esthetically pleasing, strong, nnd or low maintenance, such as the hi~h quality anodized ahonimun fencing that the City hns used. 1t doesn't burn :m<l. therefore, docs not cnu up jn the fir~ rings. It docs not require paint and. therefore, tlu.•rc is no 111.1intcn~mcc. There is :m initfal high cost of inst:d l,,tion but com,idc.•ring the lung·tcrnt use of the facility it is very cost effective. 9. Provide drnin~•p,c of the parking areas !!ra<lcll toward the 01.:"c:in or a stonn drain system. 'lliis wi 1l prevent the flooding over or Pacific Coa~t Highway dur_fog heavy runoff pcrioJs. 10. Provide in ro11r pl:rn for cormcctions of the beach hike trail witl1 the S:mw Ana River Trail ,me! ,Icross the hridgc to1.;ard l\cwpot·t Beach. ·11,c Citr prefers :i pcdl'stri;1n/hihc ovcrp;1~s to the inland sit.le of P()I. .i\n underpass l~q~c enough for hicyl ists Ml11ld he suhjcct to tid:il flows which woulJ 111:1kc it unusahlc 11.1rt of each <la~·. Since the hrhlgc over the S:111ta A.n:1 River i~ subject to rc·mo\·al 1J1,rin~ 1ddening of the J1aci flc Co:1st lligln\'.1y, spc-ci fying the cx:1ct h1plcmc-ntation of the-conncctio1! m:Iy he premature. llowcver, a 111appc<l lo<..:ational designation for future dcvclcr~ woul<l be appropriate. 11. 111:111 :md providC' rnr :i v:1riahlc IIIC'!>Sagc s iJ~ll sy:-;t<.!111 ,.,.hi,.:h wi 11 inform the puhl ic. of :1t.:cc-ss <.:omli tions :n each of the c11tranrc~, whether thl'rc is p:1rking available, c-tc. It i~ prefc·rrcll tlwt this sy5tcm include exit dire<.:ting siJ!IIS on the San Dici~o Fn•c1my. H>1,·,~vcr, si1!nin1: on llroukhurst, '-~IJ'.11nl ia, Nc1\ll:u1d, :md Hc:1d1 for enough frn111 the :1ppro:1dws to the.• hc:1r.:h to pcnnit thl• llriv1..·r to d1an1•.c direction to use:-:mother l"ntrmu.:c or to tum ilrcund would he minimally surn ... :icnt. J\n alternative is a ra<lio information service similar to ,111 ,li1vort approad1 station. 87 .. .. . •. '\t~•lil. ~ll·h~ t, ,i., .... -1. ... ui...a.\,,11 • ~o\·C'nd)cr b. 19i8 Page 4.· U u 12. Ba~c-tl upon ;1 St.itc•t,;hlc grlYi..rth in ch:111antl for rccrcatio11al vehicle (RV) overnight stopping spots, provii:lc hooku;1s for RV's :md ii c.hunp station. \~ith cffC'ctlvcly no stopping plncc for mt•s hct\-Jct'n Dohcnr State Beach im<l \'cuturn Corn1ty~ n rc-nl need for tJlis public service is evident. There is no cviclcncc that this dem:111d will lessen in the near future. 11,c nt:tual design could sho1,· the vnns nnd smaller IW's nc~ircst the bc:1ch next to tahlcs tind perh:1ps she) tcrs which nrc-provided. The areas to the center of the lot could be <liagonally striped to at:co111nodate large JlV's. charter buses 1 nm! trailer vehicles. J\n .ilt<~rnativc to the provision in this urh:m beach of tlic ltV services wm1Jd be to incn.·nsc the operation of the more remote Holsa Chica Sta tc Beach to tJ1e north to include atlJitionnl RY facilities. ·mc:--c IN facilities should be' :wni I:il>lc not just in orf-sC'ason, .ns there is .n regional need for ntlllitional campsites during the st.u11ner season.* A.-:. a tJ1ir<l alternative, both beaches could provide this service. 13. The pl:m depicts no fire rings. I\ 111ini11111m.of JS nc-w rin• rings should he im:lu<lcd. To serve the evening user:;, rirc rings nt Jc-ast dcsig,wtc Circ areas nm! db,CC)tir:igc opc11, unrontnincd rires. Groupill!! tht•:,;;e fire rin~s into one or two areas wil 1 nid in m:lintcn:uu.:c. lk1i Ir c.:lc:111011t or the fire rings will be necessary to 111.'lintain tJ1c «luality of the st1rrow1Jing san<l areas. H. PiL,lic tables (not just snnck tnhlcs nt concessions) should be provided to ~crvc short-tcnn visitors, trnvclcrs, t•tc. lhC'sc tahlc:--~hould be snmcwha t scp:i rat c-d :incl hlcn ti fi .ih 1 c:-from the highway. A section of me tc-red parkin!,! spaces within the lot would scr,;e the user:--or these' t:1hlC's. Laq!C s:roups of tahlc:-., :i-... nt Ho lsn C:hka Beach, lw.vc been fu1111d to he unused hccausc of their lack of separation for private use anJ easy access from parking. , 15. 'Ilic.-plnn ~hould discuss l\!hy inland parking anu bus trnms to the beach .ire not to be util izcJ. 16. 'lhi:--is a rcquc~t that the State reconsider the City of lhmtington Beach as a contract operator for the State bcachcs in the corporatc I imit.s of Huntington Bc.•:,ch. Maintcnan1.:c would be jncludcd as :i City rcs1xmsihility. ·n1c City has n lm11~ hi~tory mid knnwkd,~c or hcach opcnition ,uHl 1aai11tc11ancc. 'lliis nrrangcmcnt Wl}utd certainty re-I icvc the State of its m:my prohlcuL.., ·or maintaining t1..ro ,.:idcly sC"pamted beaches. It wouh.l also provide for a more cost·cffcctive operation. Ji. An C":-<p,1ndccl EIR j~ nc:-edcd to provide infon:1J.tion 11eccs~:iry to the c\'al11:~tion . of this projcl·t; :iHo a l'.o~t nnalysis which inllil·:1tcs thC' annual cos~ ol 01~rat1on :111d m:lintl'n:ml."e as proposC'd. '111c City of lluntington Hcad1 has c,._pcnencc w1th dc-vC'lopin.c nnd opcrati111! beaches in .n co~-t effective 111:11111cr an<l c:m provide :1llvkc on tlcs ign d·i tcri:i basc<l oi1 m::iinteniuKe im<l oncrationnl cost. 1,••rxEning l·:1111pgrou11ds arc filled to c:ipacit)' over RII nights cad, ~1mu1<..•r. fully re~erved months in advance, nnd there is n l:ick or a<lJitio1ial Park System lan<l for new crnnpgrounds." Dept. of Pnrks fi Recreation . 88 ... ,State Parks :; l!e...:rcation ,. ~~ovcn,1,cr 6, 1V78 ·Pugc S. u u 1hc plan needs to disctt..;s the facilitation of access for the 20,000 more people for whom there is c.1pacity, even if in a later phase, etc. A phosed <lcvclopment plan woul<l present .such provisions. 18. This pl.in nce<ls to he coonlinatcc.1 in its time phasing, design location an<l grncling level with other pl:ms within the City or lluntington Beach. In p:irticular, the Or;mgc Cou11ty Sanitation JJistrjct pl:ms to place trunk ~ch·er 1 incs nlonr. the ocean si<lc or Pad fie Coast llighwny will require inuncdinte coorc.lin:ition. ·me Orange r.ounty Flooc.l Control District proposals for modi fic:1tions at the mouth of the Santa M;'l River ac.ljnccnt to the lluntington State Beach nn<l 'lcrn Sanctuary may hnvc significant effects which will ncctl to be consi<lcrcc.l. in the Beach IJcvclopmcnt Plun. 'Ilic Paci fie Co;1st llil,!hway wi<lcning project though odgin~l1r proposct1 nnJ prcsc-ntly supported hy the City 1:i~•r be led by the Cn Ii fomia llcpartJ:icnt of Transportntion which shoul<l be consulted concerning, rights-of-way, etc. A repeat of the right-of-way prohlcm nt the Holsa Chic:1 St~ztc Beach, l\'hcrc onl}' 10()' of right-o(-way was left for the Pacific Coast llighway, shoul<l he n\'oi<lc<l. In that area, now to widen the Pad fie Coast I ligh\\'3}', nrca on the in1nncl sit.le or the llighway within the Bolsa Olien natural habitat area may have to he <listurbcd. With posgihlc wctlm1d nrcas h~neJiatcly inlnml or P.1cific Coast lligln,;ay ncross from the lhmtington State Be:ich the potential for an it.lcntical difficulty with rights-o[-w.1y exists. Concerning this tmdcvclopcd property <lfrcctly opposite the Bc:1ch, coordination with State lcpartrncnt of J=ish an<l Cai:ic ahout State mmcr- ship potentials, :m<l <lcsign:ition of this area within the Resource Protection zone of the State Beach is rcconuncnclcc.l. Fim11y, ,,;e npprcd.ttC' the opportunity for our Stuff to have this input in the planning process for the lluntjnr,.ton State l~cach. \(c \,;oul<l \\'C'lcomc the opportunitr to p;1rtici pa tc in plarming decisions for the further development of the Bolsa Chica State Bcad1 as well. Sincerely, --~✓;I.Y.5~ Flov<l . Belsito City <lministrator FGB/MLN/<lc 89 , . • . DIS'l'RIWTI0-1 t1sr I ~plrt:Malt of. Parks & nccreatioo District IS 111 Patera Lmc fbleta, Cl\. 93017 Attn: E .o. Hilson r:ci:Qctlrcnt of rarks & ~tion J 416 ?Unth Street Slcrarrcnto, CJ\. 95811 httn: omicl C--orfaim ~i:artncnt of Parks & lbcreation 1416 Ni.nth Street f w.crarrcn to, Cl\. 9 5811 Attn: Clark nll.daVin P.mironm:'.nt."ll ~\:"lnagc:rrent Agenc:f P.O. BCD: 404'l Santa 1\na, Ci'\. 92702 l\ttn: nic:.ianl Munsell n. Smith South O:>ast ncq. Cbmnission 'l:>,: Hsn lonq teach, 0\. i{. Hartwiq, Planninq Director Oranqc County Traru::it District 41222 hc..,ci~ Parkway r:x1J:dcn nrovc, CA. r,. Pcicl, Project Planning Ora.n(JC County s.1 .. u.tation Dist. 10:344 Ellis l\vcnuc ro·.ntain Valley, CJ\. fb·~rtrrcnt of Parks & r~cation 1416 Ninth Street r.ulte 1405 f..,1.,::ra:n0!1.to, CJ\. Q5814 At'"...n: nru:c l<enncdy V Mr. R'.JSscll Cahill , Oircc tor calif. ~pt. of rarks & P.ix. 1416 Ninth. St.reet • Sacrancnto, CA. 95811 Senator Paul carpmtcr 37th District 1600 N. nroaclway Suite 550 Santa 1\na, CA. 92706 Goverror Edmund Bl-own, Jr. State capitol Sacrc1Ire.nto, CA. 95814 '1ttn Miller Calif. Parks & PL"Crmtion 18090 Ocach Olvtl. #8 Uuntin]t:on Beach, CJ\. 92648 N;scoolyr.nn Ma.ngc=s 73rd District Huntington Beach, CA. 9261\!l \ 11.,ry Lynn thrby Huntington Ibach Planning D:?pt. tbrrn t·brthy, Director lluntington Dcach Ibcrcation and Parks Cepart:r:unt lblph I.eV'Ja Traffic Division Huntington Beach Public \·orks Ocpurtrrcnt Vince U::,orh:>use, Director Huntington Beach Haroors and Deachcs tcpll"tm.mt Jjm Palin, h:ting Director Planiing ~rtncnt 90 ---------------· --· . ___) -r .... - tr_,...-----..... •·. i '--......... ... • ... . t = -' . . . I ·::z- )_ I -... .. . .•-· I -----------.. -___ j_ ) .4lTERNATc- _;.-.------- ---- REVISIONS REFERENCES , ·., ... ..:., •~:. _._ _ _., _____ .._ _______________________________ ,_,1 _________________________ ..... _______ _ ~~--~ .. : ... ~ ... I,-,, , 91 -------------•··--------- _) 't .. I" ----------·-- ., ~·· _...., ____________ .. •.,:.; AL7ERNArc INTc_,CSEC. 71'~N ~A'/CJ4'T 57Aie 13cACN PA<:/r/C C~-A~T HWY-/51:.,'GH ~J..IIP CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH rn•A.RTMENT Of" PU Bi''= WOrl-11.S 92 v ;u.H •. , CAllFORNIA.-,tH, l!fSOURCES 1,.cn;cy ~EPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Southern Re,~ion Headquarters 2505 C:ougress Street San Dlego, California 92110 February 26. 1981 Mr. :Jikc i\da:r.s Assistant Planner Oepartn:.ent of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P. o. Box 190 Huntington Hench, California 9264S Dear !-Ir. Aclams: Please assure the Huntington Beach City Council that the State of Californla, Department of Parks. and Recreation, will E:ndcavor to maintain the public access facilities constructed on Balsa Cl:ica State Beach between 9t!1 Ave:,ue .:incl Coldcnwest. We look forward to bc?in 0 involved in the ccsign rcvictt anJ final np!)ro·,ml of construction planu. It is our intent to operate x1<l ~alntain the foc!lit!c~ to the hichcs t level possible within our fundccl cap.:ibil itien.. Sincerely, ·-c:;(;f C 71((:-rl,~,r"//_/. 1_,, rtcrbcrt L. Heinze, l~egion:11,y1rlc,tor Southern Region / \ .. , .. \ ......... ' 93 •--,, . Submitted by Date Prepared December 23, , 19~ Backup Material Attached Qg Yn Subject HUNTINGTON STATE BEACH DEVELOPMENT PLAN City Administrator's Comments APJ>JlOVED llY CITY COUNcii.l Approve as Recommendec Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: pTATEMENT OF ISSUE: The State Department of Parks and Recreation's Redevelopment Plans for _·Huntington state Beach will be submitted to the California Coastal Commission on January 7, 1981. The Department of Parks and Recreation is requesting that the City sign an "approval in concept 11 form" which can be submitted to the Coastal Com.~ission. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the adoption of a resolution for the redevelopment of Huntington State Beach (attachment I) and authorize the Department of Development services Director to sign the "approval in concept" form as conditioned (Attachment II). }\NALYSIS: Since the early 1960 1 s, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been planning for improvements to Huntington State Beach. In 1974, the Department began work on plans for the redevelopment of Huntington State Beach. The· departmemt reviewed the plan with the City and citizens• groups and received a favorable response. The 1975-76 State budget appropriated $1,250,000 for the first phase of development; however, these funds were later used to purchase the old Pacific Electric Right-of-Way adjacent to the park. PIO 3/78 94 .. Page Two The additional land acquisition required the Department to revise the development plan. The revised plan was presented to the City in July, 1975. The City raised nume=ous objections and Council opposed the plan as presented. City and State staff worked together in the development of a new plan,which was presented to the State Parks and Recreation Commission in January, 1976. The State Commission felt that the additional parking would pave too much of the sand area and encourage more cars rather than public transportation. A compromise plan was prepared in August 1978. After careful review by the City, 18 points of contention were expressed in a letter to the State, dated November 6, 1978. On January 17, 1979, the State responded to these comments agreeing with many. however, identifying a number which need further discussion and a few that they could not agree to. On December 4, 1980 the State met with City staff to review the 18 point letter. The meeting concluded with the City and State in basic agreement on the issues (Attachment III meeting minutes). Two additional concerns were raised at this meeting. 1. The State should be responsible for the cost of curb, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting adjacent to the park boundaries. 2. The design, materials and maintenance of the State Beach landscaping should be compatible with the City beach; and the City will have an opportunity to review the final~design. These items should be added as conditions to the 11 approval in concept 11 form required by the Coastal Commission. The revised plan has been approved by the State Parks and Recreation Commission with $500,000 budgeted for the Development of working drawings. The State will request $7,000,000 in development funds from the legislature early in 1981. ·nespectfully submitted, luJJ~ /frames w. Palin, Director V Department of Development services JWP:MA:gc 95 ~ ~ ~Tit.ICU~ IUCH • u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION To Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From City Administrator Subject HUNTINGTON STATE BEACH Date July 7, 1975 over the past year the State Departme~t of Parks and Recreation has been preparing a developcent plan for Huntington State Beach. Nur.ierous meetings have been held with the State and City Staff as well as the State Beach Design Committee which was appointed in December 1973. The City has been commenting on the plan during each stage of its development. However, only minimal considerations have been given to City recommendations. Input has ranged from general conunents on the State's approach to planning the facility to specific details of the proposed project. • In February,· 1975 the State Parks and Recreation Commission held a public hearing in Santa Barbara, California on the plan. At that meeting City Staff requested a continuance of the.hearing to the July 11, 1975 meeting of the Commission. During the time since that meeting City Staff and the State Beach Design Committee have met with State Park and Recreation Department staff members and reiterated previous concerns. These meetings resulted in a revised draft which was sent to us for comment in May, 1975. Sub sequently, on June 26, 1975, a revised document for the general develop ment plan was released by the State. This revised document is now scheduled for public hearing on July 11, 1975 in the Huntington Beach City Council Chambers. After a year of work with the State Park and Recreation Department Staff the plan is still not acceptable to City Staff. , The plan deficiencies can be grouped in two categories: the general philosophy of the plan and specific design proposals. The general philosophy of the plan document is unacceptable to City Staff as it lacks an overall plan for Huntington State Beach as it will ultimately be with the recommended land acquisitions. Also it is questionable as to whether there is a justifiable cost-benefit ratio for the proposed improvements which increase accessibility by only 100 cars. The document assumes and plans for a much lesser intensity of use than the City Beach realizes on peak periods and thus does not provide for the increasing demand for beaches in Southern California. Lastly, the plan philosophy does not provide for design compatibility of Huntington State Beach with our City Beach. The plan is also unacceptable in some of its design proposals. It does not indicate the design treatment to be given to comfort stations, lifeguard control tower, and concession buildings. Rather than some ------ 96 Page 2 CA-46 standard plan, buildings that are compatible with the structures on the City Beach would be preferable. The plan does not provide for acceptable traffic circulation, particularly the nebulous statement regarding the possibility of a main entrance at Magnolia Street. While the proposed landscaping plan ls imaginative, City Staff feels that it is impractical with our clinatic conditions. The document provides for the removal of the chain link fence but does not specify what will replace it. Previous proposals were for a modified low fence which City Staff opposed. Finally,the plan makes no provisions for improvements to Pacific Coast Highway which are necessary for aesthetic and safety reasons. For these ·reasons the Departments of Planning, Public Works, and IIarbors and Beaches recommend that the City council go on record opposing adoption of the proposed plan and that City Staff be authorized to present this position to the State Parks and Recreation Commission on July 11, 197£. Furthermore, it is recommended that the City request the State Department of Parks and Recreation to work with the City Staff in developing a phased comprehensive development plan for the entire shoreline of Huntington Beach which includes the three State Beaches and the City Beach. It is felt that in this way these beaches can be developed to their optimum potential and improve the aesthetic quality of the Huntington Beach shoreline. It must be pointed out that taking this position may have the dis advantage of holding up improvements on the State Beach from Fiscal Year 76-77 to Fiscal Year 77-78. City Staff, however, feels that obtaining a design plan that provides for a beach that is harmonious and compatible with Huntington Beach is worth a possible year's delay. Respectfully s~it~, _ £2.JA9. «-~ David D. Rowlands City Administrator ~---...,,,,.- ., City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-220 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Jennifer Villasenor, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY:Jimmy Hoang, Code Enforcement Manager Subject: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-07 declaring weeds and rubbish a public nuisance and scheduling a Public Hearing on May 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to hear protests and objections to the abatement Statement of Issue: Each year, the City identifies privately-owned properties with excessive weeds and/or rubbish that constitute a public nuisance. To address these conditions, the City Council adopts a Resolution declaring the City’s intent to abate the nuisance on the identified properties. Financial Impact: Declaring properties as a public nuisance has no long-term financial impact on the City. Following the Public Hearing and abatement of weeds and/or rubbish, the City will recover the costs of abatement by assessing the property owners through their property tax bills. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-07, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Finding and Declaring That Certain Weeds Growing in the City and Rubbish and Refuse Deposited on Public Ways and Private Property are a Public Nuisance; and Fixing the Time for Hearing Protests and Objections to the Abatement Thereof.” Alternative Action(s): Do not adopt the resolution and provide alternative direction to staff. Analysis: The California Government Code authorizes local governments to declare weeds and rubbish a public nuisance as a necessary step before initiating abatement. Consistent with this authority, the City of Huntington Beach has incorporated weed abatement requirements into Municipal Code Chapter 8.16 (Weed Abatement). Under HBMC Section 8.16.020 (Nuisance Declared), property owners must keep their land free of City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 2 97 File #:26-220 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 -07, which: ·Declares that certain weeds, rubbish, and refuse located on specific properties constitute a public nuisance. ·Sets May 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for a Public Hearing to consider protests and objections. ·Authorizes the City to post notices and proceed with abatement if necessary. Property Identification & Notification: ·This year, 121 undeveloped or vacant properties have been identified as requiring abatement (see Attachment 1). ·Each affected property will be posted with a Notice to Destroy Weeds and Remove Rubbish and Refuse. ·Property owners will also receive official written notice of the May 5th Public Hearing and the City’s pending weed abatement actions. After the Public Hearing, if no valid objections are raised, the City will proceed with abatement of non- compliant properties. The cost of abatement will then be assessed to the property owners through their property tax bills, ensuring that there is no fiscal impact on the City. Environmental Status: The removal of weeds, refuse, and rubbish from undeveloped private properties is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(h), which exempts the maintenance of existing landscaping and native growth. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. Resolution No. 2026-07, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Finding and Declaring that Certain Weeds Growing in the City, and Rubbish and Refuse Deposited on Public Ways and Private Property are a Public Nuisance; and Fixing the Time for Hearing Protests and Objections to the Abatement Thereof,” including Exhibit A: 2026 Weed Abatement - Vacant Parcels Private Ownerships 2. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 2 98 99 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING AND DECLARING THAT CERTAIN WEEDS GROWING IN THE CITY AND RUBBISH AND REFUSE DEPOSITED ON PUBLIC WAYS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE A PUBLIC NUISANCE ; AND FIXING THE TIME FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS TO THE ABATEMENT THEREOF WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that certain weeds more particularly described below are growing upon certain streets, sidewalks, parkways and private property in the City of Huntington Beach, and that rubbish and refuse are found upon parkways, sidewalks and private property in the City, and that the same are a public nuisance; and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach determines that said weeds and rubbish and refuse should be removed and abated as a public nuisance in accordance with the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 13, Article 2 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 39560. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 13, Article 2 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 39560 and Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.16 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby determines and declares that weeds that bear seeds of a downy or winged nature , and weeds that attain such a large growth as to become, when dry, a fire menace, and dry grass, stubble, brush , litter or other flammable material which endangers the public safety by creating a fire hazard , and weeds that are otherwise noxious or dangerous, are growing upon certain streets, sidewalks, parkways and private property in the City, and that rubbish and refuse are found upon parkways, sidewalks and private property in the City, and the same are hereby declared to be a public nuisance. The names of such streets as they are commonly known , and the property fronting such streets, sidewalks or parkways, or where such nuisance exists are hereinafter particularly described according to the official assessment maps of the County of Orange , as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. 2. The Director of Public Works of the City of Huntington Beach for the purpose of this Resolution , and pursuant to Section 39560, et seq., of the California Government Code, is hereby designated as the person to perform the duties imposed by law, and is hereby instructed and directed to prepare and post notices, to destroy weeds, or to remove said rubbish and refuse as required by law. Such notices shall be in accordance with the requirements contained in Government Code Sections 39564 through 39567, and shall be conspicuously posted on or in front of the property where the nuisance exists or , if the property has no frontage, upon any street , highway or road most likely to give actual notice to the owner. The notices shall be 26-17774/405327 1 100 RESOLUTION NO . 2026-07 posted as follows: -One notice to each piece or parcel of property in separate ownership of not over fifty (50) feet frontage ; not more than two (2) notices to any such parcel of property in separate ownership with a frontage of one hundred (100) feet or less; and if the frontage of any place or parcel of property in separate ownership is greater than one hundred (100) feet, such notices shall be posted at not more than one hundred (100) feet apart. Such notice shall be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the time of hearing of objections. 3. The City Council does hereby set May 5, 2026 at 6:00 p .m., as the time , or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center , Huntington Beach, California as the place for hearing objections and protests to the proposed removal of such weeds , rubbish and refuse. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the _____ day of ____________ , 2026. Mayor REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Manager Director of Community Development APPROVED AS TO FORM: j-.,.,.,,-City Attorney 2 6-1 777 4/405 327 2 101 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 APN 023-093-28 023-114-14 023-124-04 023-127-27 023-134-12 023-137-02 023-141-17 023-147-24 023-147-25 023-156-14 023-167-04 023-167-16 024-011-25 024-038-23 024-038-24 024-107-09 024-116-11 024-117-12 024-123-07 024-123-08 024-124-18 024-134-15 024-141-27 024-144-10 024-151-35 024-181-24 107-691-20 110-017-26 110-017-27 110-021-23 110-151-10 110-151-11 110-152-07 110-152-09 110-152-23 110-153-05 110-162-19 110-163-17 110-164-08 110-164-11 110-164-12 110-164-15 110-164-18 110-165-05 110-182-03 110-182-11 110-184-04 110-184-10 110-186-04 110-186-07 110-186-09 110-186-14 110-186-16 110-211-01 111-022-07 111-074-02 111-120-11 111-120-12 111-130-07 111-130-08 LOCATION CORNER 14TH & MAIN S/E CORNER 20TH & ACACIA S/S IDE 20TH BTW PECAN & ORANGE S/SIDE 21ST BTW OLIVE & ORANGE N/SIDE 19TH BTW OLIVE & WALNUT S/SIDE 21ST BTW PCH & WALNUT S/E CORNER 19TH & ACACIA N/W CORNER ACACIA & 16TH N/W CORNER ACACIA & 16TH N/SIDE 17TH BTW OLIVE & ORANGE CORNER OF 17TH AND PCH CORNER OF 16TH AND PCH 14th @ACACIA E/SIDE OF PCH N OF 11TH STREET E/S IDE OF PCH N OF 11TH STREET N/W CORNER 8TH & PECAN N/SIDE OF 9TH STREETS OF OLIVE A' N/S IDE OF 8TH ST S OF OLIVE AVENU N/S IDE OF 8TH ST; BTW PCH & WALNl CORNER PCH & 9TH PCH BTW 7TH & 8TH TRIANGLE E/S LAKE BTW ALLEY & OR S/SIDE 7TH STREETS OF ORANGE 3RD ST, BTW OLIVE AND ORANGE PCH SO. CORNER OF 7TH W/SIDE HUNTINGTON S OF INDIANAP< SE CORNER BEACH & TERRY S/SIDE TALBERT W OF EDWARDS S/SIDE TALBERT W OF EDWARDS WARNER@ SANDRALEE ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA - N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/OF ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -N/O F ELLIS W/SIDE GOLDENWEST S/OF ELLIS S/SIDE OF WARNER, E/OF GOTHARD NE CORNER GARFIELD & GOTHARD NIE CORNER GARFIELD & GOLDENWE N/E CORNER GARFIELD & GOLDENWE S/S IDE GARFIELD E OF GOLDENWESl S/SIDE GARFIELD E OF GOLDENWESl SIZE SQ. FT. 59 X 105 6,664 117.5X50 5,875 50 X 117.5 5,875 25X117.5 2,938 25 X 95 2,375 117.5 X 37.5 4,406 117.5X50 5,875 117.5X25 2,938 117.5 X25 2,938 117.5X25 2,938 163 X 50 8,150 163 X 25 4,075 25X117.5 2,938 Unknown 2,875 Unknown 12,200 50X117.5 5,875 ODD 2,875 ODD 5,800 62.5 X 117.5 7,343 150.7 X 74.5 11,788 25 X 110 2750 ODD 5,640 Unknown 2,900 117.5x75 8,812 100 X 108 10,800 Unknown 3,400 150X150 22,500 ODD 82,753 ODD 2,350 ODD 6,500 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112X 25 2,800 112X25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 50 5,600 112X25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112X25 2,800 112X25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112X25 2,800 112 X 50 5,600 112X25 2,800 112 X25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 25 2,800 25 X 87 2,175 97.5 X 80 7,800 ODD 362,870 20 X 100 2,000 115 X 50 5,750 ODD 5,850 ODD 5,850 102 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 6 69 70 71 72 73 74 7 5 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 9 5 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 11 3 114 11 5 116 117 11 8 119 120 12 1 111-130-09 111-130-10 111-130-14 111-130-39 142-172-01 145-092-27 146-211-24 146-311-17 153-051-11 153-201-27 153-421-01 157-411-02 159-102-14 159-151-16 159-282-14 159-393-24 159-393-59 159-393-60 159-393-67 159-393-68 159-393-69 159-471 -15 159-541-51 163-361-09 163-361-10 165-261-44 165-311-16 167-311 -02 167-321-10 167-325-19 167-325-20 167-325-21 167-341 -01 178-071-21 178-161-3 5 178-201-28 178-201-29 178-201-30 178-201 -31 178-201-32 178-201-33 178-201-37 178-201-4 1 178-201-47 178-201-48 178-201-50 178-201-51 178-201-73 178-201-74 178-201-7 5 178-411-17 178-411-1 9 178-432-03 178-523-09 178-532-45 178-532-77 178-532-78 178-543-19 178-551-13 178-651-36 195-053-18 S/E CORNER GARFIELD & GOLDENWE S/E CORNER GARFIELD & GOLDENWE S/SIDE GARFIELD E OF GOLDENWESl S/E CORNER GARFIELD & GOLDENWE S/SIDE HEIL@ BEACH ROYALIST W OF PLYMOUTH E/SIDE GRAHAM PLACE S OF HEIL NW CORNER WARNER AND LARK E/S BEACH N/OF YORKTOWN S/SIDE GARFIELD W/O BROOKHURST S/SIDE GARFIELD W OF MAGNOLIA N/SIDE OF GARFIELD W OF NEWLAND E/SIDE OF FLORIDA S OF MAIN GARFIELD E/OF DELAWARE N/SIDE CLAY BTW HOLLY AND HUNTI~ ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS ENCYCLOPEDIA -S/SIDE ELLIS W/SIDE HUNTINGTON N OF MAIN E/SIDE GOTHARD N OF GARFIELD E/SIDE BOLSA CHICAS OF LOS PATO! E/SIDE BOLSA CHICAS OF LOS PATO' E/SIDE SAMPSON S OF SLATER W/SIDE OF BEACH S OF SPEER E/SIDE BEACH BTW HOLLAND & BLAY W/SIDE "B" St. N/OF BLAYLOCK E/SIDE BEACH BTW HOLLAND & BLAY E/SIDE BEACH BTW HOLLAND & BLAY E/SIDE BEACH BTW HOLLAND & BLAY S/SIDE OF WARNER W OF NEWLAND S/SIDE EDINGER W/OF BOLSA CHICA N/S HEIL E/OF LE GRANDE GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY GREEN BTW PIERCE & NEELY W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH W/SIDE GREEN N OF PEARCH END OF MALDEN CIRCLE END OF MALDEN CIRCLE CHANNELS /OF ADMIRAL TY PCH/18TH ST -SUNSET BEACH END OF PARK AVE@ PCH -SUNSET E END OF PARK AVE@ PCH -SUNSET E S/SIDE PCH W OF WARNER -SUNSET PCH/6TH ST -SUNSET BEACH S/SIDE PCH W OF WARNER -SUNSET S/SIDE PCH W OF WARNER -SUNSET N/SIDE BOLSA E OF SPRINGDALE 100 X 117 11 ,700 50 X 117 5,850 Unknown 23,750 51 X 117 5,851 ODD 7,600 36 X 100 3,700 Unknown 13,000 120 X 177 21 ,240 100 X 442 44,200 75 X 400 30,000 Unknown 5,800 ODD 106,100 Unknown 16,200 77 X 150 11 ,550 ---------49,800 112 X 25 2,800 112 X 25 2 ,800 112 X 25 2,800 50 X 112 5,600 50 X 112 5,600 ODD 96 ,416 Unknow n 11 ,000 Unknown 53 ,300 ODD 11 ,500 ODD 212 ,719 Unknown 10 ,200 ODD 22 ,500 264 X 174 45 ,936 45 X 116 5,220 95 X 100 9,500 100 X 103 10,300 30 X 198 5,940 Unknown 2 ,000 145 X 147 21,344 131X120 15,720 25 X49 1,225 25 X49 1,225 50 X49 2,450 25 X49 1,225 25 X49 1,225 51 X49 2,499 ODD 1,225 ODD 1,280 ODD 1,225 ODD 1,225 ODD 1,225 ODD 1,225 ODD 1,280 ODD 2,450 ODD 2,450 ODD 9,000 ODD 9,000 125 X 61 7,625 80 X 71 5,64 7 ODD 3,471 ODD 4 ,7 38 Unknown Unknown 30 X 90 2,700 30 X 74 2,250 Unknown Unknown Unknown 22 ,300 Annual Weed Abatement Declaration of Nuisance Community Development April 7, 2026 103 Background • The City conducts an annual weed abatement program for vacant private property. • 1st City Council meeting in April – Declaration of a Public Nuisance. • Public Hearing in May to hear any objections. • Affected properties are identified through research and field inspections. 104 PROGRAM TIMELINE • Mid-April 2026 Affected private properties will be posted with a “Notice to Destroy Weeds and Remove Rubbish and Refuse.” • Letters will be mailed to private property owners with information about Public Hearing and annual weed abatement efforts. • 121 private vacant parcels have been identified. 105 Recommended Action • Adopt Resolution No. 2026-07 to Declare Public Nuisance. • No fiscal impact. • Exempt from CEQA. 106 Questions? 107 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-283 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Jennifer Villasenor, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY:Celeste Coggins, Senior Management Analyst Subject: Approve and authorize execution of 3-year Professional Services Contracts in the amount of $700,000 for On-Call Environmental California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Services with LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA), Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Environmental Planning Development Solutions (EPD), and Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI) Statement of Issue: The Community Development Department requires on-call environmental consulting services for as- needed support in preparing documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Financial Impact: An appropriation to the general fund will be required when projects requiring CEQA review are confirmed through a task order. Each project will require a matching reimbursement agreement with a project applicant to fund the project at no cost to the City. Occasionally, some City-led projects may use these contracts for CEQA related work. For example, park development requiring CEQA documents may use these contracts; however, funding for the contracts in this situation would be paid out of the Parkland Development fund as collected through development impact fees . Recommended Action: A) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 “Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and LSA Associates, Inc. for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”; and, B) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Science Associates, for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services”; and, C) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $700,000 “Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Planning Development Solutions City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 3 108 File #:26-283 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 . Alternative Action(s): Do not authorize the contracts and direct staff accordingly. Staff will not be able to utilize consultant services for these documents and direct staff to facilitate a different process for document preparation under CEQA. Analysis: On January 15, 2026, the City advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services. Proposals were requested and submitted in compliance with Chapter 3.03 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Twenty-three proposals were received. In accordance with qualifications-based selected procurement, per the Federal “Brooks Act”, State SB 419, and the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 3.03 “Professional Services”, the Community Development Department established a review board. Proposals were then evaluated and ranked by the review board. The top four firms were selected according to overall ranking. CEQA review is required for all discretionary projects proposed by applicants. For many planning applications, a project would be exempt from environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines. Some projects, however, require preparation of an environmental document such as a negative declaration or environmental impact report to comply with CEQA. These documents require technical studies on specific topics such as geology, hydrology, noise and air quality, which require expert analysis from qualified professionals in the respective field of study. Therefore, the Community Development Department contracts with professional consultants to assist in the preparation of CEQA documents. Preparation of a CEQA document usually adds a significant amount of time to the overall processing of a project. When an applicant submits a project, it takes about two months to start CEQA document preparation in order to obtain proposals and execute a contract with a consultant. This can add two months to an already lengthy process. The four contracts recommended for approval are for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services. By utilizing on-call CEQA services, the Community Development Department will be able to streamline the CEQA process for applicants and eliminate approximately two months of processing time from a project. The consultants selected will complete assignments as directed by staff through a proposal and confirmed by a task order. Each proposal will be prepared according to the needs for environmental reports for that particular project. The documents required by the California Environment Quality Act will be prepared by the consultant. Each task order issued will be matched with a reimbursement agreement with a project applicant that covers all expenses for the preparation of such documents by the assigned consultant. The financial impact of these activities is net neutral due to the required reimbursement agreement. Preparation of a CEQA document can vary significantly. The cost to prepare a CEQA document can range from $50,000 to $500,000 depending on the type and scope of project submitted. Therefore, these consultants were selected to meet the projected workload over the next three years with a City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 3 109 File #:26-283 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. RCA Contract Agreement Summary 2. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and LSA Associates, Inc., for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services. 3. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Science Associates, for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services. 4. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Environmental Planning Development Solutions, for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services 5. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Michael Baker International, Inc., for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services 6. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 3 of 3 110 RCA Contract Agreement Summary CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VENDOR NAME + TYPE OF SERVICE CONTRACT INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION TYPE OF AGREEMENT (Professional Services, Service Agreement) PROCUREMENT SCOPE OF WORK TOTAL COMPENSATION TERM OF CONTRACT/AGREEMENT OTHER: Bonds, Special Contract Terms, Emergency DATE PRESENTED REQUESTING DEPARTMENT STAFF CONTACT(S)INSURANCE STATUS 04/07/2026 Approved Community Development Celeste Coggins $700,000 3 years LSA Associates, Environmental Science Associates, Environmental Planning Development Solutions, and Michael Baker International, Inc. will serve as on-call professionals for CEQA documents. On-Call Professional Services Agreement (Environmental Services for CEQA Document Preparation) Request for Qualifications issued via Planet Bids per Municipal Code 3.02 on January 15,2026. A review board was established by Community Development. Top 4 firms were selected for contracts. Consultants serve on an as-needed basis with limits to contract duration and not to exceed amounts as specified in the purchase order for each task. Each task order for private applicants will have a reimbursement agreement to make the fiscal impact net neutral for the City. 111 LO CITY OF rD HUNTINGTON BEACH 112 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CEQA SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., a California Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSUL TANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on-call environmental CEQA services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULT ANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSUL TANT as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULT ANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULT ANT hereby designates Laurel Huntzinger who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 26-17865/408341 1 of 11 113 3. TERM· TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSUL TANT are to commence on April 5, 2026 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than one year from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in Exhibit "A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULT ANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSUL TANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULT ANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000). 5. EXTRA WORT( In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULT ANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSUL TANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit "B." 26-17865/40834 I 2 of 11 114 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULT ANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS A. CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULT ANT's ( or CONSUL TANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent (or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSUL TANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULT ANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULT ANT. B. To the extent that CONSULTANT performs "Design Professional Services" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.8, then the following Hold Harmless provision applies in place of subsection A above: 26-17865/408341 3 of 11 115 "CONSUL TANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) to the extent that the claims against CONSULTANT arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSUL TANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to CONSUL TANT exceed CONSULT ANT' s proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more other defendants to the claims and/or litigation is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, CONSULT ANT shall meet and confer with CITY and other defendants regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in California Civil Code Section 2782.8. C. Regardless of whether subparagraph A or B applies, CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULT ANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULT ANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance 26-17865/408341 4 of 11 116 policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULT ANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSULT ANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSUL TANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULT ANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: 26-17865/408341 A. B. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; state that the policy is currently in force; and 5 of 11 117 C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (I 0) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULT ANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULT ANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSUL TANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULT ANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULT ANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the 26-17865140834 I 6 of 11 118 event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULT ANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULT ANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U.S. certified mail-return receipt requested: 26-l 7865/40834 ! 7 of 11 119 TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Director of Community Development 2 000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT TO CONSUL TANT: LSA Associates, Inc. ATTN: Laurel Huntzinger 3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 When CITY's consent/approval 1s required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or constrne the intent of the paiiies or affect the constrnction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or 26-17865/40834\ 8 of 11 120 neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL Jhe original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, inespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSUL TANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULT ANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 26-17865/40834 J 9 of 11 121 24. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either pmty to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective patties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that patty or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that pmiy has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this 26-17865/408341 10 of 11 122 . Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the pruties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreeme nts whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. Th is Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused th.is Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. CONSULT ANT, LSA ASSOCIATES , INC. Byill),¥ ~ ....... C~~~c._r_-__ _ rin amc ITS: (circle one Chairman residcni/Vice President print name: ~----- ITS: (circle one) Secreta1y hief Financial Officer Asst. Secretary -Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California Mayor City Clerk INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Community Development REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FOR..M: (-vt-~~ ft-City Attorney 26-17865/408341 11 of 11 123 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29 . EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to b e executed by and through their authorized officers. CONSUL TANT, LSA AS SOCIA TES, INC. By: ___________ _ print name ITS: (cir cle one) C hairman/Presiden t/Vice President AND By: ____________ _ print name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Ch ie f Financ ia l Officer/Asst. Secretary -Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Cal ifornia Mayor City Clerk INITIA'fED ~~·AJ?~ROVED: / • I f ,/ ,vi /2 \ , Director of Community Devel opment REVIEWED AND APPROVE D: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: r~~ Pz-,City Attorney 26-l 786S /40834 1 11 of 11 124 EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be perf01med) CONSUL TANT shall provide consulting services on an "as-needed" basis for projects to be determined during the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY shall issue task orders based upon scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to City for its review and approval B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Furnish scope of work request for each project 2. Prepare associated reimbursement agreements and collect developer payments in a timely manner in conjunction with projects assigned. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by City. EXHIBIT A 125 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES FEBRUARY 12, 2026 126 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environment al (CEQA) Consulting Services Contents A. Ven dor Appl ication Form and Cover Letter .............................................................................. 1 Vendor Application Form .......................................................................................................... 3 B. Background and Experience Section ......................................................................................... 3 1. LSA's Abilit ies ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. LSA's Local, State, and Regional Experience .......................................................................... 6 3 . LSA's Un ique Characteristics .................................................................................................. 8 4. Legal Challenges .................................................................................................................... 8 5. LSA's Project Management and Client Satisfaction ............................................................... 8 C. Staffing .................................................................................................................................... 11 Organizational Chart ................................................................................................................ 15 D. Qual ifications and References ................................................................................................ 16 E. Fee Schedu le ........................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix -LSA Certificate of Insurance ..................................................................................... 20 127 LSA A. Vendor Application Form and Cover Letter CARLSBAD CLOVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS EMERYVILLE RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO February 12, 2026 City of Huntington Beach Attn: Alyssa Salazar 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental {CEQA) Consulting Services Dear Ms. Salazar: LSA's Local and Managing Office: 3210 El Camino Real Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 (949) 553-0666 LSA is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for On -Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services in response to the Request for Qualifications issued on January 15, 2026, by the City of Huntington Beach (City). Given our knowledge and current on-call experience working in the City, LSA can confidently provide technically thorough and legally robust environmental documentation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). LSA understands that the City is seeking qualified professional consultants to provide services for preparation of Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Negative Declarations (NDs), Initial Studies (ISs), Addendums, technical studies, peer reviews, and environmental mitigation and implementation. Some of LSA's key strengths related to these services are: • Experience with the City: Our proposed team is familiar with the i ssues that are important to the residents of Huntington Beach and has the ability to customize environmental assistance accordingly. LSA is currently working on the Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project and has completed numerous other projects for the City including the Se acliff of Huntington Beach Inspired Senior Living {Assisted Living/Memory Care Facility) Project, the Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project, and the Bella Terra Residential Project. The contract will be managed out of our local Irvine office, just 16 miles from Huntington Beach City Hall. • Technical Expertise: LSA is thoroughly familiar with the processes, procedures, and technical requirements of CEQA. This expe r tise includes coordinating with local, State, federal, and other governmental agencies; preparing and processing environmental documents and technical studie s; managing public participation programs; issuing necessary legal notices; and incorporating them into the relevant planning process. • On-Call Experience: Along with our experience as an on-call consultant for the City, we are on several other on -call lists for nearby jurisdictions such as the Cities of Newport Beach, Long Beach, Lake Forest, and Laguna Woods. This experience has brought a comprehensive understanding of what skills are needed to manage an on-call contract and multiple task orders . As the designated Principal in Charge for this contract, Ryan Bensley, AICP, will provide quality ass urance of documents prior to submittal. Laurel Huntzinger will serve as the Project Manager and the main point of contact for all requested tasks. Together, Mr. Bensley and Ms. Huntzinger l l P age 128 LSA have extensive experience delivering similar services to public entities throughout Southern California, including several of the jurisdictions noted above, as well as Cypress, Dana Po i nt, and San Juan Capistrano. LSA has 50 years of experience preparing thousands of environmental documents and providing environmental planning services for municipal clients throughout California. Many public clients, including the City itself, have recognized LSA's ability to provide a broad spectrum of environmental services on an as-needed basis and w ork collaboratively with agencies, project sponsors, and technical consultants, and to communicate effectively with diverse audiences at public forums . LSA understands that assistance for environmental planning services on an on-call basis could come in the form of preparation of a Notice of Exemption/memorandum in support of a Notice of Exemption, IS, ND, MND, EIR, or Addendum to a previously prepared environmental document and additional technical studies. LSA has comprehensive experience in preparing and reviewing CEQA analysis documents of all kinds . Our fee schedule of hourly rates will be valid for a period of at least 180 days. We anticipate an annual escalation of up to 5 percent in our hourly rates starting January 2027. As Chief Executive Officer, I am authorized to bind LSA to this contract. We submit this SOQ with a great deal of enthusiasm and look forward to continuing to serve the City. Should you have any questions, please contact our Project Manager, Laurel Huntzi nger, at (805} 242-4060 or Laure l .Huntzinger@lsa.net . Sincerely, LSA Associates, Inc. hj~ Amy Fischer Ch i ef Executive Officer Note: LSA carries a $50,000 Professional Liability Insurance Deductible, in keeping with the standards for our profession. We have been granted an exception to the $10,000 deductible requirement in our prior agreement with the City. We are requesting a waiver of this deductible requirement for this contract. Our ex isting Certificate of In surance with th e City is included. We appreciate the City's consideration regarding this matter. 2 1Page 129 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Ca ll Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Vendor Application Form REQUESTFORPROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICANT: □NEW ~ CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: LSA Associates , Inc. Contact Person for Agreement: _L_a_u_re_l_H_u_n_tz_i_n_g_e_r _____________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100 City, State and Zip Code: Irvine , California 92602 E-Mail Address: laurel.huntzinger@lsa.net Phone: (805) 242-4060 Fax: (805) 782-0796 Contact Person for Proposals : _D_a_n_i_e_l _B_r_it_o _______________ _ Title: Proposal Coordinator Business Telephone: (951) 394-0541 E-Mail Address: daniel. brito@lsa .net Business F ax: ( 951 ) 7 81-4277 Year Business was Established: 1976 ------ Is your business: ( check one) 0 NON PROFIT CORPORATION ~ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: (check one) ~ CORPORATION 0 INDIVIDU AL 0 PARTNERSHIP 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 0 SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP 0 UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION 130 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEOA) Consulting Services Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Title Phone Amy Fischer CEO (559) 490-1213 Wes Speake President/COO (951) 397-2861 JT Stephens Executive Vice President (510) 462-1327 Justin Cary CFO (949) 419-924 7 Federal Tax Identification Number: 94-2341614 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: A273842 (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 5/31/2026 131 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services B. Background and Experience Section LSA is a 100 percent employee-owned environmental consulting firm with 50 years of experience and nearly 180 employees in nine offices throughout California. LSA's corporate headquarters is located in Irvine, and LSA has additional offices in Los Angeles, Carlsbad, Riverside, Palm Springs, Roseville, Emeryville, Clovis, and San Luis Obispo. As planners and environmental analysts, we are active in all aspects of community development, land use planning, and public involvement. As technical specialists, we provide expertise in biological resources and permitting, cultural, historical, and paleontological resources, air quality/greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change, noise and vibration, transportation, water quality, and geographic information systems (GIS). Environmental analysis, planning, and permitting have been the cornerstones of LSA's professional practice since our founding in 1976. We are thoroughly familiar with the processes, procedures, and technical requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and are a "one-stop" choice for environmenta l documentation service s. 1. LSA's Abilities Our environmental team has prepared thousands of documents to satisf y the requirements of spec ific agencies such as the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Federal Highway Adminis tration (FHWA), the United States Fi sh and Wildlife Service, the California Coa stal Commission, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards. This expertise includes coordin ation with local, State, federal, and other governmenta l agencies preparing and processing environme ntal documents and technical studies, managing public participation programs, issuing necessary legal notices, and incorporating each document into the relevant planning process. LSA has a successful track reco r d of preparing environmenta l documents that are technically sound and legally robu st as well as innovative and solution oriented. Additionally, many of our planners are certified by the Ame r ican Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and are active members of the American Planning Association and the Association of Environmental Profes sionals. The LSA Team provides technical services that address all the topic areas outlin ed in the Request for Qualifications . The following i s a brief introduction to LSA's areas of specialization as they pertain to this contract: • En vironmental Analysis. LSA's Environmental Planning Group offers broad expertise in Ii~;.., environmental analysis and guides projects through all aspects of CEQA docum e ntation . ~ Working across multiple technic al disciplines, our staff members combine their knowledge of science and regu lations with creative problem-solving skills to provide solutions that are innovative, practical, and efficient. LSA offers highly ski lled and responsive support to both publi c-and private-sector clients. Thi s experience includes the prep aration of a wide range of environmental documents, including CEQA Categorical Exemptions, In itial Studies (ISs), Negative Declarations (NDs), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs). 3I Pa g e 132 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Our environmental planning team regularly works with land use and environmental attorneys who provide us with specific suggestions as to how the most recent case law should be interpreted and incorporated into our CEQA documents. Additionally, the team coordinates with our air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, noise, traffic, and hydrology and water quality disciplines to develop technical studies that are regularly incorporated into CEQA and planning documents. Our planners use their thorough understanding of CEQA and decades of analogous projects to craft environmental documentation that is thorough, technically sound, and resilient to challenges. This process streamlines documentation and focuses on the analysis, all while ensuring that the resulting documentation is legally robust and defensible. l) _ Biological Resources. LSA's biological resources staff members are known for their ~ expertise in the identification, evaluation, management, and restoration of biological 1 resources. The firm's staff of scientists prepares biological resource inventories, constraints analyses, and impact assessments. The team's extensive experience in special -status species evaluation, vegetation mapping, wetland analysis, and resource management is respected by both clients and regulatory agency staff. LSA designs habitat restoration plans and mitigation banks, implements and monitors revegetation programs, and coordinates with multiple agencies on biological and wetland permitting issues. In addition, LSA provides assistance in the implementation of permitting procedures for federal and State resource permits, including Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, Sections 1602 and 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code, and Sections 7 and 10 of the Federal Endangered Species Act. Archaeological, Tribal, and Historic Cultural Resources. LSA's cultural resources staff members provide field surveys, testing, laboratory services, resource evaluation, and historical assessments. They also develop mitigation measures for cultural resources protection and preservation programs and coordinate Section 106 clearances for State and federal projects. LSA's architectural historians and prehistoric and historical archaeologists leverage their technical skills using experience in the context of historic preservation planning to develop feasible, defensible resource assessments and mitigation measures that balance agency mission needs with the responsibility to manage effects to heritage resources. Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, and Health Risk Assessments. LSA II offers complete assessment modeling and monitoring of air quality impacts for ,d residential and commercial developments, institutional facilities, and airports; for ~I?\ General Plan/Specific Plan studies; and for transportation projects. These services include modeling of construction and operational emissions with mobile and stationary sources, as well as odor assessment and control. LSA also prepares health risk assessments and community risk reduction plans. Ir,(('. Noise and Vibration. LSA's noise specialists provide acoustical assessment services in { l I compliance with CEQA, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and local • requirements. LSA's acoustical services range from construction-level analyses of transportation and development projects to the assessment of unique sources of noise as part of planning documents and studies. Noise specialists use computer models and assessment protocols developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), United States Environmental Protection Agency, FHWA, Caltrans, and city and county governments with jurisdiction over project sites. Computer models used include the Aviation Environmental Design Tool, FAA's required noise model, and Traffic Noise Model (TNM) 2.5 for motor vehicle noise relate d to roadway and freeway projects. 41 Page 133 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Transportation/Mobility. LSA offers comprehensive transportation planning and engineering services for all aspects of transportation projects. LSA transportation staff members cross disciplines and work with other team members to define attributes like trip distribution and assignment from economic, market, and population studies. LSA has also provided creative mobility solutions to various communities statewide and has supported local communities with alternative transportation planning and active transportation implementation. LSA uses its experience in transportation and land use planning to prepare circulation technical reports, long-range transportation plans, bicycle master plans, nexus studies and fee programs, parking strategies, co rri dor studies, and preliminary engineering services. Hydrology and Water Quality. LSA provid es a variety of services to assess how present and proposed actions could affect water quality, particularly with respect to stormwater -,, management. Services include review of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, Sediment and Erosion Control Plans, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit compliance evaluations. GIS and Graphics. LSA's GIS department serves as the backbone for our environmental analysis work, supporting LSA's technical disciplines with spatial data collection, creation, integration, analysis, and visualization. LSA's GIS specialists are ex perts in solutions architecture, web and mobile application development, aerial image capture and processing, pixel classification and feature extraction, spatial analysis and modeling, community engagement and data sharing, advanced field data collection methods, and expert cartography. Our geospatial skills are informed by the extensive scientific and reg ulatory subject matter expertise present within LSA's other professional disciplines, enabling LSA's GIS t ea m to produce the specialized datasets, analyses, ma ps, and applications required to plan projects, make decisions, and comply with State and federal regulatory requirements. LSA has been an Esri partner for over 25 years. We maintain the latest versions of Esri software, including ArcGIS Pro, Enterprise, Online, Field Maps, Survey1 23, Dashboards, Experience Builder, and Hub. We also partner with Ne armap and ParcelQuest to ensure access to current, high resolution aerial imagery and statewide parcel boundaries and ownership data. We use high accuracy global navigation satellite system and unmanned aerial vehicle equipment to collect accurate, high -quality spatial data and imagery. LSA's GIS specialists strive to continually hone their technical skills and domain knowledge by attending and presenti ng at GIS conferences, taking advantage of geospatial t ra ining opportunitie s, and pursuing technical and professional certifications. LSA's Understanding of Local Issues and Challenges LSA ha s provided clients with the environmental analysis services described above for 50 years. Our staff understands the key issues and challenges associated with deve lopment in the City of Huntington Beach. As illustrated on the LSA Projects Map (shown following the li st of project ex perience on page 7), LSA has completed over 60 documents and/or reports for the City . Thi s project experience ha s resulted in familiarity with the issues facing Hunt ington Beach, including challenges related to sea level rise and flooding; environmental issues specific to coastal development proj ects ; provi sion of housing to meet the Regional Housing Need s Assessment goal; and assisting with challenges balancing growth while addressing residents' concerns. In addition, thi s understanding has resulted from LSA's professional relationships with the City's Community Development and Public Works staff, and throu gh involvement with profe ss ional organizations such as the American Planning Association and the Association of Environmental Professionals. 5 IPage 134 Statement of Qualifi cations to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEOA) Consulting Services Our team has a strong understanding of the City's CEQA process and can provide the services required, including CEQA or NEPA environmental analysis and documentation, and provide mitigation monitoring that may be required during project implementation. LSA staff understands that development must be balanced with the objectives of the City and implemented in a manner consistent with the City's land use policies and goals. The environmental document is ultimately adopted or certified by the City by its own i ndependent judgment, and LSA understands how to navigate this process through its experience working for both private developers and public agencies. As the City proceeds forward with CEQA evaluations, analyses covering these topics will be required. LSA has considerable experience working on such issues and analyses and is ready to assist the City with making defensible decisions. LSA is staffed with experts in CEQA/NEPA requirements and processes. This expertise includes: coordination with local, State, federal, and other governmental agencies; managing public participation and outreach programs; issuing mandated legal notices; and incorporating the environmental assessment process into the overall project planning process. 2. LSA's Local, State, and Regional Experience The list below shows LSA's depth of experience managing nearby on-call contracts with public agencies. This experience has brought a comprehensive understanding of what skills are needed to manage an on -call contract and multiple task orders. Additionally, the company has extensive experience working with public agencies on mixed-use and residential developments, commercial developments, recreational facilities, and transportation projects throughout California. • City of Huntington Beach • City of Newport Beach • City of Lake Forest • City of Anaheim • City of Long Beach • City of Cypress • City of Irvine • City of Yorba Linda • City of Garden Grove • Caltrans District 12 • City of Los Angeles • Transportation Corridor Agencies • Port of Long Beach • City of Laguna Niguel • Rancho Santiago Community College • City of Santa Ana District • Irvine Company • City of San Juan Capistr ano • City of Laguna Woods • Orange County Flood Control District • OC Public Works • City of Norwalk • OC Waste & Recycling GI Pag e 135 f LOS ANGE LES COU NTY Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services I • 0 ORANGE CO U N T Y . • • • Huntington ~ • Beach • • lo I Santa l\na - Garden Grove > Costa Mesa 0 lSA Projects LSA Projects in Huntington Beach: Map Exhibit This map shows LSA's current and completed projects within the City of Huntington Beach. It illustrates the depth of LSA's regional experience and familiarity with the environmental settings and resources that we have developed through our work with the City. 71P a ge 136 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environm ental {CEQA} Consulting Services 3. LSA's Unique Characteristics The breadth of LSA's experience related to development projects in the California Coastal Zone has led the firm to its familiarity and successes in navigating controversial development projects. The qualifications of LSA's specialized project team extend to its understanding of the California Coastal Commission. LSA has successfully faced challenges on numerous controversial or otherwise difficult projects in the Coastal Zone, including former oil fields, agricultural fields, landfills, dredge spoil sites, and diked and drained areas. Furthermore, LSA holds key insights and awareness of relationships between the City and developers. As shown later in the Qualifications and References section of this Statement of Qualifications, LSA has successfully navigated these relationships in the past and created a seamless process to navigate through project completion. 4.LegalChallenges LSA has a long history of providing clients with objective, high-quality products that are able to withstand court challenges. Our documents, if challenged in the past, were successfully proven to be defensible, or the parties were able to reach a settlement prior to the court date. Due to our long-standing history in CEQA/NEPA we are able to anticipate which local groups may challenge an environmental document, and prepare the document to address/mitigate those concerns. 5. LSA's Project Management and Client Satisfaction 3:;:;;:::· '. . 1ITITi1!irififfimte.m.1.1.;a __ • _ ..... ~nt ement -~----_ _ _ _ .<.ey Issues ■tP!rn 1!J).~~i-~7.M-~'9Dgt~::~-:-~ • Comprehensive Documentation • Work Efficiently with City Staff WO Comrriuni!',! • Realistic Schedule and Budget .;, F.1~1i!I iW iWl!.R.~@~1Y~ • __ -_.: ~:-;_ LSA understands that an on-call assignment requires an "on-call" obligation. The LSA Team must anticipate tasks, be responsive, be knowledgeable, and be solution oriented. LSA's experience has led the firm to one common denominator when working under an on-call services contract: constant, clear, productive communication . LSA's existing knowledge of the City, combined with its CEQA experience, minimizes the time and costs associated with mobilization. Since this assignment is for task order services to be performed on an as-needed basis, we understand a specific work plan is not required at this time. This section presents LSA's general approach to this contract. Clear understanding between City staff and the LSA Team regarding each assignment's goals and objectives is essential. A well-defined communication and reporting protocol will be established. LSA's basic management plan for each task order is to provide a wel l-defined budget, schedule, scope of work, staffing, progress reporting, and quality control procedures based on LSA's Quality Control Plan . This work plan wil l ensure that a proactive approach to project management is provided to City staff. LSA's goal is to function as an extension of City staff throughout the duration of the contract. Understanding of City Staff Needs. Through our experience working with public agencies, we know that City staff can be constrained by the time and effort required to manage the planning and environmental review process. All of the materials we submit will be as deliberate and complete as possible, and in full compliance with the City's environmental review processes and procedures. We will respond promptly and thoroughly to City comments. We will facilitate the document review process by providing "compare versions" of documents, showing the explicit changes made between drafts. 8jP age 137 Statement of Qualifications t o Provide On-Ca ll Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services We encourage the establishment of regular team teleconferences to provide progress updates. We are open to and will travel to City offices to meet when face-to-face dialogue will be the most effective form of communication. We believe that the ability of LSA staff to work independently of, but in close communication with, City staff is one of our greatest assets. We routinely assist public agency staff with public noticing, the preparation of staff reports, findings/statements of overriding considerations, and presentations for public hearings. We are adept at responding to questions from decision-making bodies regarding complex projects and planning issues. Project Management. LSA's proposed Project Manager, Laurel Huntzinger, will maintain an effective working relationship with the City and oversee the technical performance of all LSA Team members. She will review the performance of all assigned personnel with the City's Project Manager on a regular basis. Ms. Huntzinger will inform the City of all significant project information on a timely basis throughout the life of each assignment through frequent informal and formal reporting via email, phone, or virtual conversations. The LSA Team's expertise covers a broad spectrum of environmental disciplines. Our combined expertise allows us to work closely with City staff, review projects comprehensively yet efficiently, and recommend solutions that meet the City's planning and environmental rev iew objectives. Ms. Huntzinger, as overall Project Manager and primary point of contact, will manage the specific key personnel to complete each task order. Ryan Bensley, AICP, serving as the Principal in Charge, will oversee quality assurance and ensure that LSA's Quality Control Plan is implemented on all aspects of this contract. LSA understands that the City seeks a consultant who can provide adequate staffing levels at all times in order to adhere to project schedules. LSA's depth of staffing resources beyond this core project team will enable the firm to respond to any number of task orders that may be requested over the period of the contract . Methodology and Quality Control. LSA's approach for conducting environmental analysis and preparing environmental documents involves organizing the LSA Team and the tasks needed to achieve the following objectives: • Identify key environmental constraints early in the project development process. • Work with the City and the consulting team to minimize project environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable during project development. • Ensure that all procedural steps required by CEQA and other regulatory proce sses for environmental analyses are met. • Incorporate early involvement of and coordination w ith State and federal regulatory and resource agencies to resolve iss ue s and confirm assessment methodologies . • Maximize the use of existing data , reports, and other relevant information to limit the need for new or supplemental studies. • Maintain close coordination with the City and the consulting team to work toward expediting the project schedule through the environmenta l document review process(es). • Deve lop cost-effective and feasible avoidance, minimiza t ion, and mitigation measures based on implementation of relevant project field experience . 9I Page 138 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Env ironmental (CEOA) Consulting Services Tasks and Timeline . The following scope of work outlines a typical work plan that LSA would follow upon receipt of a task order from the City for environmental clearance of a development project. This project management/quality control approach would also be applicable to development and nondevelopment projects of varying sizes. Once an assigned task order is provided with an RFP by the City, LSA will prepare a detailed draft scope of work, schedule, and budget and will assign staff responsible for completing all tasks. The scope of work, schedule, and budget will be provided to the City for review and approval. During the term of the on-call contract, LSA anticipates that the City may request a broad range of potential services from its consulting firm(s), including assistance with preparing various types of CEQA compliance documents as well as technical studies in support of those documents, and peer reviews of technical studies prepared by an applicant's team . The following table provides a summary of the typical time frames required to provide most of those services. Upon receipt of a specific assignment from City staff, LSA would prepare a draft project schedule outlining the milestone dates/durations associated with each specific task required to complete the requested assignment. The draft schedule would be submitted to City staff for review and approval. Anticipated Schedules for Potential Tasks Task/Document I General Time Frame for Completion Initial Study1 2-4 weeks Initial Study/Negative Declaration 5-7 months Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6-9 months Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Reports 4-6 weeks Noise Reports 4-6 weeks Health Risk Assessments 4-8 weeks Cultural Resources Reports 4-8 weeks Paleontological Resources Reports 4-6 weeks Traffic Impact Analyses 3-16 weeks Biological Resources Reports 3-6 weeks Peer review of technical studies prepared by a 4 weeks Project Applicant2 GIS Services -Web Application Development 1-4 weeks Field Data Collection 1-4 weeks Spatial Analysis 1-4 weeks Drone Image Capture 1-2 weeks Cartography 1-4 weeks 1 Does not include any technical work or publ ic review. 2 Reflects a 2-week review by LSA: 1 week fo r the Project Applicant's consultant to address LSA's comments, plus 1 additional week for LSA to confirm its comments have been addressed. LSA is confident that it will be able to negotiate specific tasks and provide them in a cost-effective method that will ensure overall cost control. In addition, because LSA use s highly trained project staff, the firm is often able to propose innovative and cost-effective approaches to project issues. While innovative in nature, LSA always ensures compliance with regulations and the successful passage through applicable agency review of project documents, while saving money and completing projects expeditiously. lOIP age 139 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEOA) Consulting Services C. Staffing LSA offers a well-qualified team that will provide the full range of expertise needed to comprehensively address all planning and environmental topics . The following section presents the qualifications of the lead management team and key personnel who will be assigned to task orders issued by the City. Upon receiving a request for a specific task order, LSA will identify the most appropriate project manager for the assignment, based on expertise and availability. Short resumes for proposed key personnel are included below. Ryan Bensley, AICP, Principal Environmental Planner Role : Principal in Charge Education, Licenses, and Certifications : B.A., Geography, Specialization in Urban Planning and GIS; American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) No. 027971 Years of Experience: 19 Qualifications: Mr. Bensley is responsible for managing the preparation of environmental documents for a variety of transportation and land development projects. His primary responsibilities include coordinating and conducting research and analysis for environmental documents prepared in compliance with CEQA, including EIRs, Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), ISs, MNDs, NDs, and other environmental documents. Relevant Project Experience : City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project, Seacliff Inspired Senior Living Project, Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project, Bella Terra Residential Project); City of Newport Beach On-Call (Police Facility Relocation Project); City of Long Beach On -Call (Fire Station No. 9 EIR, 400 Oceangate Project); City of Laguna Woods (Housing Element Studies, CEQA Procedures Update, General Plan Zoning Updates). Laurel Huntzinger, Associate/Environmental Planner Role: Project Manager Education, Licenses, and Certifications : B.S., Environmental Management/Hydrology & Watershed Management Years of Experience : 19 Qualifications: Ms. Huntzinger is an Associate and Project Manager at LSA with more than 19 years of experience managing and preparing environmental documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA including ISs, MNDs, EIRs, Preliminary Environmental Assessment Reports, EAs, and EISs. She also manages the preparation of technical studies, develops CEQA and NEPA analyses, and provides her clients with expertise in land use planning and land use regulations. Relevant Project Experience: City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project and Bo Isa Chica Senior Living Community Project); City of Lake Forest On Call (IPT Enterprise Business Center LLC Project, Western Realco Enterprise Way Industrial Project); City of Laguna Beach Public Works On -Call . 11IPa ge 140 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Envi ronmental {CEQA) Consulting Services Olivia Mattair, Environmental Planner Role: Environmental Planner Education, Licenses, and Certifications: B.A., Environmental Studies; B.A., Sociology Years of Experience: 3 Qua lifications: As an Environmental Planner with LSA, Ms. Mattair's primary job responsibilities include environmental document preparation, inter-departmental coordination, and project management. As a Sociology and Environmental Studies double major, Ms. Mattair specializes in the nexus between social and environmental concerns, including equity, community cohesion, environmental justice, cultural/historical resource analysis, and tribal consu ltation pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 and/or Senate Bill 18. Ms. Mattair is also trained in agricultural land conversion analysis using the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model. Relevant Project Experience: City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project, Balsa Chica Senior Living Community Project); City of Lake Forest On Call (IPT Enterprise Business Center LLC Project); City of Laguna Woods On-Call (Safety Element Update, General Plan Zoning Updates); City of Long Beach On-Call (400 Oceangate Project, 4501 Orange Avenue). Jessica Coria, Principal Managing Director of Air Quality and Climate Change Services Role: Air Quality Specialist Education, Licenses, and Certifications: M.S., Environmental Science and Policy; B.A., International Relations: Global Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Years of Experience: 11 Qua lifications : Ms . Coria served as a Regional Program Manager at the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and as a consulting Senior Scientist prior to her current position at LSA. Her expertise includes regulatory compliance, air quality impact analysis per CEQA requirements, conducting health risk assessments, air dispersion modeling, sustainable project de sign, air pollution control measures, and GHG emission mitigation . She has extensive experience in project management, staff mentoring, and client relationships as well as comprehensive knowledge of CEQA requirements for air districts throughout California. Ms. Coria is experienced with the models and methods used to assess both air quality and GHG impacts. Her CEQA experience includes conducting technical evaluations and oversee i ng the preparation of air quality, GHG, and energy analyses for EIRs, Specific Plans, General Plans, Climate Action Plans, and Housing Element Updates as well as mixed-use, commercial, re sidential, and industrial warehouse projects throughout California. Re levant Project Experience : City of Huntington Beach On -Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project); City of Lake Forest On-Call (IPT Enterprise Business Center LLC Project , Western Realco Enterprise Way Industrial Project); City of Long Beach On-Call (Douglas Park Project). 12 I Page 141 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Jason Lui, Associate/Sr. Noise Specialist Role : Noise Specialist Education, Licenses, and Certifications: M.S., Environmental Studies; B.A., Environmental Analysis and Design; Environmental Management Certification; Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model 2.5 Years of Experience: 24 Qualifications: Mr. Lui is primarily responsible for the preparation of noise and vibration studies for a variety of projects in accordance with procedures specified by State and local guidelines, as well as protocols for a variety of commercial, residential, industrial, and transportation projects. He is proficient in the use of the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77- 108), TNM 2.5, MicroStation, and GIS. He is also responsible for conducting noise level measurements using a variety of Larson Davis sound level meters. Relevant Project Experience: City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project); City of Long Beach On-Call (Belmont Pool Revitalization Project EIR); City of Laguna Woods On-Call (St. Nicholas Church Project); City of Irvine (Orange County Great Park Water Park); City of Long Beach (General Noise Plan Element Update); City of Dana Point (South Shores Church Master Plan Project). Lloyd Sample, Principal Managing Director of Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Role: Cultural Resources Specialist Education, Licenses, and Certifications: N/ A Years of Experience : 32 Q ualifications: Mr. Sample serves as LSA's Principal in charge of LSA's Cultural Resources and Paleontological Group. His duties include but are not limited to paleontological and archaeological monitoring coordinator, LSA's Safety Manager, liaison with developers/construction management, and tribal coordinator. He directs staff on multiple concurrent projects. Mr. Sample is responsible for coordinating compliance assessments and monitoring; directing fossil salvage operations before and during earth-disturbing activities; overseeing the analysis, preparation, and curation of cultural and paleontological resources, the collection of contextual geologic data, and the mapping of cultural and paleontological resources; and for Principal QA/QC of project documents. Mr. Sample also designs and sets up cultu ral and paleontological interpretive exhibits for private and public clients. Mr. Sample has more than 32 years of experience, with 30 of those years at LSA. Relevant Project Experience: City of Huntington Beach On -Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project); City of Long Beach On-Call (Fire Station No. 9 EIR); County of Orange (La Pata Avenue Gap Closure Project). B l Page 142 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Kelly Vreeland, M.S.C., Paleontologist Role : Paleontologist Education, Licenses, and Certifications : M.S., Geology; B.S., Geology Years of Experience : 11 Qualifications : Ms. Vreeland is a paleontologist at LSA. Her field and laboratory experience includes fieldwork and research projects throughout California and Nevada, as well as conducting fieldwork and surficial geologic mapping in Montana. She earned her Master of Science in Geology from California State University, Fullerton, in 2014, where she focused her research in invertebrate paleontology and paleoecology. Her coursework and research at California State University, Fullerton provided her with a strong knowledge of both the geology and the paleontology of the Southern California region. Relevant Project Experience : City of Hunti ngton Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project); City of Lake Forest (Teresina Project and Jehovah's Witnesses, Kingdom Halls Project). Dean Arizabal, Principal Transportation Planner Ro le : Transportation Planner Education, Licenses, and Certifications: B.S., Computer Engineering Years of Experience : 21 Qualifications: Mr. Arizabal's primary res ponsibilities and experience include preparing or managing the preparation of technical analyses of land development and roadway improvement projects, including comprehensive traffic impact analyses, traffic operations analyses, and parking studies. He has prepared numerous traffic impact studies and access and on-site circulation analyses for mixed -use, residential, commercial, office, institutional, and alternative energy projects. Many of Mr. Arizabal 's reports and documents are incorporated into an EIR, IS, or MND . Relevant Project Experience : City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwe st Specific Plan Redevelopment Project, Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project, Bella Terra Residentia l Project); City of Newport Beach On-Call (Newport Crossings Project, Sage Hill School); City of Long Beach On-Call (Belmont Pool Revitalization Project EIR). Blake Selna, Principal Biologist Role : Biologist Education, Licenses, and Certifications: B.S., Environmental and Resource Sciences; Certified Arborist No. WE-7397A, International Society of Arboriculture Years of Experience: 26 Qualifications : Mr. Selna manages the Biology/Natural Resources Group in LSA's Irvine office, which is the hub of this discipline in Southern California . As a result, he ha s provided Principal oversight and management for projects of all shapes and sizes, covering the full ra nge of species and habitats in Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riversi de, Sa n Di ego, and Imperial counties. With hi s background as a field biologist, he has developed all of the relev a nt technical sk ills in wetland/waters delineation, regulatory perm itting, habitat mapping, vegetation classification, wildlife surveys, focu se d and floristic -level plant surveys, wildlife monitoring, 14 I Page 143 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services arborist evaluations, plant and tree salvage/transplantation plans, and construction monitoring, making him uniquely qualified to provide supervision, strategic analysis, and project advisories for technical teams created for each individual client's and project's needs. In addition to his technical skills, Mr. Se Ina has outstanding personnel, project, and contract management abilities. Relevant Project Experience: City of Huntington Beach On-Call (Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project, Seacliff Inspired Senior Living Project); City of Newport Beach On-Call; City of Long Beach (Alamito Concession Stand Rebuild). Organizational Chart Laurel Huntzinger Project Manager Ryan Bensley, AICP Principal in Charge 15 I Pa g e 144 Statement of Qualification s to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEOA) Consulting Services D. Qualifications and Refe rences LSA currently holds a multitude of active on-call contracts with public and private entities throughout the State and within Orange County. This depth and breadth of experience has contributed to LSA's comprehensive understanding of the skills necessary to manage on-call contracts and multiple task orders. LSA has successfully completed numerous environmental review documents under contract to lead agencies for residential, infill, mixed-use, commercial, industrial, transit-oriented development, and public works-related projects. City of Huntington Beach On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Services (2018-Ongoi ng) LSA has been under contract with the City of Huntington Beach since 2018 for on-call CEQA consulting and environmental documentation services. LSA is currently or has recently worked on the below task orders under the on-call contract for the City. • Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Redevelopment Project • Seacliff Inspired Senior Living (Assisted Living/Memory Care Facility) Project • Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project • Bella Terra Residential Project • Hamilton Project Reference Contact: Client Name: City of Huntington Beach Contact Name: Joanna Cortez, Principal Planner Address: 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 T : {714) 374-154 7 I E: Joanna .Cortez@surfcity-hb.gov City of Lake Forest On-Call Environmental Consulting Services (2019-Ongoing) LSA has been under contract with the City of Lake Forest since 2019 for on-call environmental consulting services. LSA is currently or has recently worked on the below task orders under the on-call contract for the City. • ITP Enterprise Business Center LLC Project • Western Realco Enterprise Way Industrial Project • Draft Noise Update 16 I Pag e 145 Statem ent of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental {CEQA) Consulting Services Reference Co ntact: Client Name: City of Lake Forest Contact Name: Amy Stonich, Assistant Director of Community Development Address: 100 Civic Center Dr., Lake Forest, CA 92630 T: (949) 461-3479 I E: aston ich@lakeforestca .gov City of Newport Beach On-Call Professional and Technical Environmental Services (2025-Ongoing) LSA has been under contract with the City of Newport Beach since 2025 for on-call professional and technical environmental and transportation planning services. LSA recently worked on the below task orders under the on call contract for the City. • Police Facility Relocation • Lower Castaways Park Transportation Planning Reference Contact: Client Name: City of Newport Beach Contact Name: Ben Zdeba, Principa l Planner Address: 100 Civic Center Dr., Newport Beach, CA 92660 T: (949) 644-3253 I E: bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov City of Long Beach On-Call Environmental Consulting (2014- Ongoing) LSA has been under contract with the City of Long Beach since 2014 for on-call environmental consulting services. LSA recently worked on the below task orders under the on-call contract for the City. • Alamitos Bay Marina Rehabilitation Project • Fire Station No. 9 • Colorado Lagoon Restoration Project • Drake Park Project • Belmont Pool Re placement Project • 400 Oceangate Project • Sorrento Trail Project Reference Contact: Client Name: City of Long Beach Contact Name: Christopher Koontz, Director of Department of Development Services 17 I Page 146 St atem ent of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Envir onmental {CEOA) Consulting Services Addr ess: 411 West Ocean Boul evar d, Long Beach, CA 90802 T : {562) 570-6288 I E: ch risto ph er.koo ntz@lo ngbeach.gov City of Laguna Woods, On-Call Environmental Planning (2021- 0ngoing) LSA has been under contract with the City of Laguna Woods for on-call environmental planning services since 2021. LSA has prepared various sections of the City of Lagun a Woods' proposed Housing Element Update as well as supporting environmental documentation and has prepared an update to the City of Laguna Woods' locally adopted CEQA implementation procedures. • Program EIR for General Plan and Zoning Code Update • Housing Element Update • CEQA Guidelines Update Reference Contact: Client Name: City of Laguna Woods Contact Name : Christopher Macon, City Manager Address: 24264 El Toro Road, Laguna Woods, CA 92637 T : {949) 639 -0512 I E: cmacon@cityoflagunawoods.org Key Staff Experience on Relevant Projects Proposed Staff Name Ryan Bensle y Laurel Huntzinger Olivia Mattair Jessica Coria Ja son Lui Lloyd Sample Role on Project Principal in Charge Project Manager Environmental Planner Air Quality Speci ali st Noise Special ist Cultural Resources Specialist Kelly Vreeland Paleontologist Dean Arizabal Tran sportation Planne r Blake Selna Biologist ' Huntington Beach On-Call ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Relevant Projects ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ---■ ■ ■ 18 I Page 147 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEOA) Consulting Services E. Fee Schedule Upon receipt of a task order for a specific project or services, LSA will provide a cost estimate in the form of a spreadsheet that details tasks by assigned personnel (hours/rate). LSA's standard billing rates by classification and LSA's in-house direct expenses are shown below in Tables A and B. As rates are reviewed annually, the rates shown below are subject to escalation. Table A: LSA Hourly Billing Rates, Effective January 2026 Planning Principal Associate Senior Planner Planner Assistant Planner Office Services Marketing Environmental Principal Associate Senior Environmental Planner Environmental Planner Assistant Environmental Planner Office Assistant Project Accountant Transportation Air/Noise Principal Principal Associate Associate Senior Senior Air Transportation Quality/Noise Planner/Engineer Specialist/Noise Engineer Transportation Air Quality/ Noi se Planner/Engineer Specialist/ Noise Engineer/ Climate Change Specialist Assistant Air Quality/ Noise Transportat ion Analyst Planner/Engineer Document Management/Technical Editing/Graphics Cultural/ Paleontological Resources Principal Associate Senior Archaeologist/ Architectural Historian/ Paleontologist Archaeologist/ Architectural Historian/ Paleontologist Field Archaeologist/Paleon tologist Biology Principal Associate Senior Biologist/ Botanist/Wildlife Biologist/Ecologist/ Soil Scientist/ Herpetologist/ Arborist Biologist/Botanist/ Wildlife Biologist/ Ecologist/Soil Sci entist/ Herpetologist/ Arborist Assistant Biologi st/ Botanist/Wildlife Biologist/Ecologist/ Soil Scientist/ Herpetologist/ Arborist GIS Principal Associate SeniorGIS Specialist GIS Specialist Assistant GIS Specialist $250-350 $170-270 $110-240 $110-190 $95-1 50 1 The hou rly rate for work involving actual expenses in court (e.g., giving depositions or similar expert testimony) will be billed at $400 per hour regardless of job classifications. 2 Hourly rates are subject to review at least annually, on or about December 1 of each year, and may be adjusted to reflect changing labor costs at LSA's discret ion at that time. Table B: In-House Direct Costs Description Unit Cost Description Unit Cost Reproduction (8.5 X 11) B/W $0.07 per page Total Station Surveying Instrument $50.00 per day Reproduction (8.5 x 11) Color $0.40 per page Level (Laser or Optical) $25.00 per day Reproduction (llx17)B/W $0.10 per page Laser Rangefinder $25.00 per day Reproduction (11 x 17) Color $0. 75 per page Sound Meter $75.00 per day CD Production $5.00per CD Sound Meter with Velocity Transducer $85.00 per day USB Flash Drive $5.00 per drive Differentially Corrected GPS $75.00 per day Plotting $3.75 per sq ft Water Quality Meter $25.00 per day Aerial Drone $200.00 per day Night Vision Goggles $50 per unit per night Mileage On-Road Current feder al rate Wildlif e Camera $25.00 per day Mileage Off-Road Current federal rate GPS Booster $25 .00 per day Tree Tag $1.00 Bat Monitoring Survey Kit $75.00 per day Small Mammal Trap $1.00 per trap per day Direct costs shall be reimbursed at cost plus 10 percent. 19 I P age 148 Statement of Qualifications to Provide On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Appendix -LSA Certificate of Insurance A~RD• CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 9/30/2026 I DATE (IIIWD/YYVYJ 9/17/2025 .........-, TttlS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY ANO CONFERS HO RIGHTS UPON TttE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. TttlS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR tlEGATIVELY AMEHO, EXTEHO OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY TttE POLICIES BELOW. TttlS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES HOT CONSTITUTE A COlffRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESEIITATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(les) must have ADOffiONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed, If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the tenns and conditions of the policy, certain policies m3y require an endon1ement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER L«kt•~ Compmlts, ll.C l~~\<I D3A Lodnm umnx• Bzobn, U.C in CA I r."2ff!. --'"-• I ff# No>: CA lktm..,OF1S767 l~~ss: &ll0E.lhuon.k."1!-,Sta.100 DD\w ro f11D7 INSU•ll"ttl$1 AfFOftOIHGCOV9AG~ HAK:a dt:r.w-<ens.'iilockroo.ccm INSUl\ER A : American Zurich Insurance C=-•ny 40142 INSUlla> '> LSAAssociates, Inc. ,.,u,.,,. a : American Guarantee and liab. Ins. Co. 26247 149274_ 3210 El Camino Rtal, Suite 100 '"'"""' c: Tokio Marine Soe6•1tv lnsuraoce Comn•nv 23850 hvine, CA 92602 ltulfflEK D : INSllllER E; INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICAT E NUMBER· 18322155 REVISION NUMBER· xxxxxxx THIS JS TO CERnFY ll1AT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POIJCY PERJOO INDICATED. NOlWITHSTANDING AfN REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDmON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH TH IS CERTIFICATE MAY BE IS SUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFOR!kD BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO AU. THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUCJES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ·;;;. TYPEOf INSUftANCE r:::-;-; ,:;;:;: POLICY HUMBER -'Y-!!'::.~=-LIIIITS A X COMIIERCIAL GENfllAL LIA!lll.lTY y y CPO 4289165 -02 9i30i2025 9/30.12026 EACH OCCURRENCE ' l I\M Mil D C\AIMS-l.lAOE [x] OCCUR :::..·=-···-.;,.;,, ..... <U S ~00.IIM - X Cont Liab. Incl MEDEXP{My~pnoo) • sooo F::l'l~IN:N DWl'Y • 1.000 000 - ~ GEN.l. AGCUGAT! UM.IT APA.lf.S PER: GEN~ AGGREGAT: , 2fVVl 000 POUCY Ix] ~~ □ lOC FROOUOTS-COMPJOPAG-G • 2000000 OTHER: • B JiUTONOBA.E UA8'UTY y y CPO 4289165 -02 9/3012025 91.!0!1026 :COl.161NEO SINGLe LIMIT Ela-otl~ • 1.000.000 :x: ANYAUTO eoo11 v INJURY (Pt< Pfl'00) • xxxxxxx OWNED ~ SCHfDUI.ED eoDILY INJURY (Per aoo»tnt) • xxxxxxx -A\ITO!J ONLY AUTOO HIR!"D NON-OWNED e!'_OPEJ!J'(,,'r"'GE • xxxxxxx -AUTOS om.v AUTOO ONLY ,.. ____ ........ "---' • t .uw UleREll..ALWI HOCCUff NOT APPUCAlll.E EACH OCCURRENCE • xxxxxxx f-- EXCESS UM Cl.AW~DE AGGREGATE • vv vv OED I I ~ETE>mON• • y y y WORKEAI COIIPENSATIOH y xl;.,~nm I I OTK- A AND EM'LOUJtt' UABUTY Y/N WC 5665125 -02 9130_12025 9/30/2026 ER MY PROPRIETOft.'PNIDIER.'EXff:VTIVE [ill N/A E..L EAQi ACCIOEHT s 1000000 OfflCEM.tEMBER EXCUJOB)? {llandltofy ln HHJ 1!..L 0 1$~-~ EM?LOYEE s l 000 000 ~1;~~8:~~Pt!AATIO~ bW,t f..L OIS:ASE -POLICY UlllT , 1000000 C C.oatncton Poll & Pro£ N N PPK.2608629-002 9!.!012025 9/30,2016 S2M O«IS4M >H, ulru • ~to: Lub. IY4ll976, $50,000 dtd DESCRFTION OfOPERAnoH.SI LOCAT10H$ IVEl'ICl£S (ACORD 101, Addbonal Rftarta SdNdlilt, m.ay Mattlchld lrmor• apaca II n"1nd) ~~~it~=~~~~~~:!k~~~~~;r.-"~~0[-;;'~='!~'=1 .. Aitiiliomllns1nl(s)i>pi!nuyoodDmK<m:nbmmy1o m.....,.po,idodb)-1bopolicyl4zlpD:,c,EDdoDa!Eiris,oed «IIPP"\"'1b!'tbo""""""'wm<.~•o!Csnc•lhtiau w!il!s~tbo ,ppllablapollcy ~JO.,-..,,.,.,_ CERTIFICATE HOLDER 18322155 City ofHuntington Beach Community DeveloJlll=l Dept 3rd Floor 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648-0000 CANCELLATION See Attachments SHOULD ANY OF THE A BOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPJRAnON DATE THEREOF. NOTICE WJU BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. ACORD 25 (20161031 The ACORD name nnd l ogo nre registered morks of ACORD 20 I Pa g e 149 LSA www.lsa.net 150 EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULT ANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT B B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billing I. All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen ( 15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who perfmmed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other documentation prepared by CONSUL TANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such prodnct, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULT ANT's firm that the work has been perfmmed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULT ANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULT ANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULT ANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 151 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing perfonnance of the remainder of this Agreement. 152 EXHIBIT B JANUARY 2026 SCHED U LE OF STAND A RD CONTRACT PROVIS I ONS A ND B I LL I NG RATES LSA HOURLY BILLING RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2026 Job Classification En vironmental Air Quality/ Cultural/ Hourly Rate Planning Transportation Climate Change Noise Paleontolog ical Natural Resources GIS Range'•' Resources Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal $250-$350 Associate Associate Associate Associate Associate Associate Associate $170-$270 Senior Senior Biologist/ Senior Senior Senior Noise Archaeologist/ Botanist/Wi ldlife Senior Planner Transportation Air Quality/ Specialist/Senior Architectural Biologist/Ecologist/ Senior GIS $110-$240 Pl anner/ Climate Change Noise Engineer Historian/ Soil Scientist/ Specialist Engi neer Specialist Paleontologist Herpetologist/ Arborist Biologist/Botanist/ Transportation Air Quality/ Noise Archaeologist/ Wildlife Biologist/ Planner Planner/ Climate Change Specialist/Noise Architectural Ecologist/Soil GIS $110-$190 Historian/ Scientist/ Specialist Engineer Specialist Engineer Paleontologist Herpetologist/ Arborist Assistant Biologist/ Assistant Air Quality/ Field Botanist/Wildlife Assistant Transportation Climate Change Noise Analyst Archaeologist/ Biologist/Ecologist/ Assistant $95-$150 Planner Planner/ Soil Scientist/ GIS Specialist Engineer Ana lyst Paleontologist Herpetologist/ A rborist Office Services Marketing $0-$185 Office Assistant/Discipline Assistant $110-$150 Project Accountant $110-$140 Document Management/Technical Editing/Graphics $115-$160 1 The hourly rate for work involving actua l time in court (e.g., giving depositions or similar expert testimony) will be billed at $400 per hour regardless of job classifications. ' Hourly rates are subject to review at least annually, on or about December 1 of each year, and may be adjusted to reflect changing labor costs at LSA's discretion at that ti me. LSA IN-HOUSE REIMBURSABLE COSTS1 Description Unit Cost Description Unit Cost Reproduction (8.5 X 11) B/W $0.07 per page Total Station Surveying Instrument $SO.OD per day Reproduction (8.5 x 11) Color $0.40 per page Level (Laser or Optical) $25.00 per day Reproduction (llx17)B/W $0.10 per page Laser Rangefinder $25.00 per day Reproduction (11 x 17) Color $0.75 per page Sound Meter $75.00 per day CD Production $5.00 per CD Sound Meter with Velocity Transd ucer $85 .00 per day USB Flash Drive $5.00 per drive Differentially Corrected GPS $75.00 per day Plotting $3.75 per sq ft Water Quality Meter $25.00 per day Aerial Drone $200.00 per day Night Vision Goggles $50.00 per unit per night Mileage On-Road Current federal rate Wildlife Camera $25.00 per day Mileage Off-Road Current federal rate GPS Booster $25.00 per day Tree Tag $1.00 Bat Monitori ng Survey Kit $75.00 per day Small Mammal Trap $1.00 per trap per day 1 other direct costs shall be reimbursed at cost plus 10 percent. W :\Projects\Active\0000 Contract Review Checklist & Related Oocuments\Contract Redlines. langu age and Notes\LSA Standard Contract\2026 Update\StandardContractProvisions_Jan_2026.docx 4 153 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION WAIVER MODIFICATION REQUEST 1. Requested: Risk Management 2 . Date: March 27, 2026 3. Name of contractor/permittee: LSA Associates, Inc. 4. Description of work to be performed: On Call Environmental CEQA Services 5. Value and length of contract: 3 years not to exceed $700,000 6. Waiver/modification request: Professional Liability deductible $50,000 7. Reason for request and why it should be granted: LSA Associates has provided a financial statement that shows they are in good financial standing. 8. Identify the risks to the City in approving this waiver/modification:Low Department Head Signature Date: APPROVALS Approvals must be obtained in the order listed on this form. Two approvals are required for a request to be granted. Approval from the City Administrator's Office is only required if Risk Management and the City Attorney's Office disagree. 1. ~ ·s Management ~~{-; _/L _ -Approved D Denied /(1'-M Signature Date 2. ~ ·ty ttorney's Office ~ ll/ l { ~ Approved D Denied Signature Date 3. City Manager's Office D Approved D Denied Signature Date If approved, the completed waiver/modification request is to be submitted to the City Attorney's Office along with the contract for approval. Once the contract has been approved , this form is to be filed with the Risk Management Division of Human Resources Waiver Form 3/27/2026 10:58 :00 AM 154 ACORD® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANC E 9/30/2026 I DATE (MMIDD/YYYY) ~ 9/17/202 5 ,.............. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIF ICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED , th e policy(ie s) must hav e ADDITIONA L INSURED p rovisions o r be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the pol icy, certai n polic i es may r e qui re an e ndors ement. A stat eme nt o n this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsem ent(s). PRODUCER Locktou Compnnics. LLC CONTACT NAME: DBA Lockton Insurance Orokcrs. LI.C in CA PHON E FAX ,,.,r t-t ... c .. n. IA/C Nol: CA license ffUF 157(,7 E-MAIL 81 10 E Union Ave., Ste. 100 ADDRESS: Denver CO 80237 INSURER(§) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# dcnvcr~ccns@lockton.com 1N suRER A : Am erica n Z uri c h Insurance CQ!!ll>any_ 40 142 INSURED LSA A ssocia tes, Inc. 1N sURER B: America n Gua r a ntee a n d Liab. Ins. Co. 26247 1492742 3210 El C ami no R eal , Suite I 00 INSURER c : Tok io Mar i n e Specialty Insurance Company 23850 Irvine, CA 92602 INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 18322 155 REVISION NUMBER : xxxx:xxx TH IS IS TO CERT I FY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LIST ED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURE D NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. N OTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUI REMENT, TE RM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONT RACT OR OT HER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED O R MA Y PERTAIN, TH E INSURANCE AFFORDED B Y THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS O F SU CH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN RED UCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INS R ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF IN SURANCE INSD un,D POLICY NUMBER IMM/DD/YYYYI IMM/DD/YYYYl LIMITS A .x.. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY y y CPO 4289165 -02 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 EACH OCCURRENCE s I 000 000 0 CLAIMS-MADE [x] OCCUR DJ\MJ\uE TO RENTED PREMISES lEa occur,ence' s 300 000 .ll Cont. L iab. I ncl. MEO EXP (Any one person) s 5 000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY s I 000 000 - GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE s 2 000 00 0 ~ [K]PRO· O Loc PRODUCTS· COMP/OP AGG s 2 000 00 0 POLICY JECT OTHER: s B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY y y CPO 4289 165 -02 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 fe~~~~~~~l;'INGLE LIMIT s I 000 000 - X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) s xxxxxxx OWNED -SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) s xxxxxxx -AUTOS ONLY -AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE s xxxxxxx AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY lPer accidentl --Coma./Coll. Ded s 1,000 UMBRELLA LIAB H OCCUR NOT APPLICABLE EACH OCCURRENCE s xxxxxxx ·-E XCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE s xxxxxxx OED I I RETENTION s s xxxxxxx WORKERS COMPENSATION y X ~~~TUTE I I OTH· A WC 5665125 -02 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 ER ANO E MPLOYERS ' LIA BILITY YI N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE llil N /A E.L. EACH ACCIDENT s 1.000 000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) E.L. DISEASE • EA EMPLOYEE S I 000 000 U yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.l. DISEASE • POLICY LIMIT s I 000 000 C Contractors Poll & Prof N N PPK2608629-002 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 S2M occ/$4M ugg, Retro date : Liah 6/411976, $50,000 ded. DESC RIPTION OF OPERATION S/ LOCATIONS/ VEHICLES (ACORD IOI, Additional Romarks Schedule, may be attached II more space Is roqui rod) RE: Projccl No. CEQA On•Coll. Celeste Coggins. City of l luntinglon Beach. its oOiccrs. elected or appoinLcd officials. employees. agents nnd volunh!crs are an Addi 1iunr1I Insured to the cxh.:nl provided by 1hc polh:y hm~uagc or cndorscmc~l issued or appro\'cd by l~c insurancl' ca_rrier. Waivl.'.'r or S ubrogntion ~pplics per a11achcd cndors_cmcm(s) or PC?licy la1~gtm8;c. lnsumn~c provi~cd to Additional lnsurcd(s) is pnnmry and non•co ntnbutory 10 the extent pro\11dcd by 1hc pohcy lnngungc or endorsement 1ssucll or npprovcd by lhc insurance earner. No11ec of CanccHnuon applies per lhC' applicnblc policy lnngungc or endorsements. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION See A ttac hment s SHOULD ANY OF THE A BOVE DESCRIBED POLIC IES BE CANCELLED BEFORE 18322155 THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL B E DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE W ITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City o f Hu ntin g ton B each Com mun ity D e v e l o pme nt D ep t. 3rd F l oor AUTHORIZED REPRESWENTAT~,. .-::/"~'e 4-; 2000 Main Street Huntin gton Beach CA 92648-0000 ✓-~ ~,.··1 I /.. ,/ © 1988-207.'5 ACORD CORPuRATION. Al l rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD nam e and logo are registered m arks of ACORD 155 Policy Number: CPO 4289165 • 02 Attachment Code: D590986 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 In the event that an insured reports an "occurrence" to the workers compensation carrier of the Named Insured and this "occurrence" later develops into a General Liability claim, covered by this Coverage Part, the insured's failure to report such "occurrence" to us at the time of the "occurrence" shall not be deemed to be a violation of this Condition. You must, however, give us notice as soon as practicable after being made aware that the particular claim is a General Liability rather than a Workers Compensation claim. V, Other Insurance Condition Paragraphs 4.a. and 4.b,(1) of the Other Insurance Condition of Section IV -Commercial General Liability Conditions are replaced by the following: 4. Other Insurance If other valid and collectible insurance is available to the insured for a loss we cover under Coverages A or B of this Coverage Part, our obligations are limited as follows: a. Primary Insurance This insurance is primary except when Paragraph b. below applies. If this insurance is primary, our obligations are not affected unless any of the other insurance is also primary. Then, we will share with all that other insurance by the method described in Paragraph c. below. However, this insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured provided that: (1) The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and (2) You are required by written contract or written agreement that this insurance be primary and not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured. Other insurance includes any type of self insurance or other mechanism by which an insured arranges for funding of its legal liabilities. b. Excess Insurance (1) This insurance is excess over: (a) Any of the other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis: (i) That is property insurance, Builder's Risk, Installation Risk or similar coverage for "your work"; (ii) That is property insurance purchased by you (including any deductible or self insurance portion thereof) to cover premises rented to you or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner; (iii) That is insurance purchased by you (including any deductible or self insurance portion thereof) to cover your liability as a tenant for "property damage" to premises rented to you or temporarily (iv) If the loss arises out of the maintenance or use of aircraft, "autos" or watercraft to the extent not subject to Exclusion g, of Section I -Coverage A -Bodily Injury And Property Damage Liability; or (v) That is property insurance (including any deductible or self insurance portion thereof) purchased by you to cover damage to: Equipment you borrow from others; or Property loaned to you or personal property in the care, custody or control of the insured arising out of the use of an elevator at premises you own, rent or occupy. (b) Any other primary insu.rance (including any deductible or self insurance portion thereof) available to the insured covering liability for damages arising out of the premises, operations, products, work or services for which the insured has been granted additional insured status either by policy provision or attachment of any endorsement. Other primary insurance includes any type of self insurance or other mechanism by which an insured arranges for funding of its legal liabilities. (c) Any of the other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, available to an additional insured, in which the additional insured on our policy is also covered as an additional insured on another policy providing coverage for the same "occurrence", claim or "suit". This provision does not apply to any policy in which the additional insured is a Named Insured on such other policy and where our policy is required by written contract or written agreement to provide coverage to the additional insured on a primary and non-contributory basis. 156 Policy Number: CPO 4289165 -02 Attachment Code: D590975 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 W. Unintentional Failure to Disclose All Hazards Paragraph 6. Representations of Section IV -Commercial General Liability Conditions is replaced by the following: 6. Representations By accepting this policy, you agree: a. The statements in the Declarations are accurate and complete; b. Those statements are based upon representations you made to us; and c. We have issued this policy in reliance upon your representations. Coverage will continue to apply if you unintentionally: a. Fail to disclose all hazards existing at the inception of this policy; or b. Make an error, omission or improper description of premises or other statement of information stated in this policy. You must notify us as soon as possible after the discovery of any hazards or any other information that was not provided to us prior to inception of this Coverage Part. X. Waiver of Right of Subrogation Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of Section IV -Commercial General Liability Conditions Is replaced by the following: 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against others To Us a. If the insured has rights to recover all or part of any payment we have made under this Coverage Part, those rights are transferred to us. The insured must do nothing after loss to impair them. At our request, the insured will bring "suit" or transfer those rights to us and help us enforce them. b. If the insured waives its right to recover payments for injury or damage from another person or organization in a written contract executed prior to a loss, we waive any right of recovery we may have against such person or organization because of any payment we have made under this Coverage Part. The wrrtten contract will be considered executed when the insured's performance begins, or when it is signed, whichever happens first. This waiver of rights shall not be construed to be a waiver with respect to any other operations in which the insured has no contractual interest. Y. lnRem Section IV -Commercial General Liability Conditions is amended to add the following: In Rem Any "suit" brought as an action in rem against any watercraft owned or operated by or for the insured shall in all respects be treated in the same manner as though such "suit" were brought against the insured. Z. Liberalization Condition The following condition is added to Section IV -Commercial General Liability Conditions : Liberalization Clause If we revise this Coverage Part to broaden coverage without an additional premium charge, your policy will automatically provide the additional coverage as of the day the revision is effective in the state shown in the mailing address of your policy. All other terms, conditions, provisions and exclusions of this policy remain the same. U-GL-2219-A CW {08/21) Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. Page 12 of 12 157 Attachment Code: D590988 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 ILOO 171198 COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS All Coverage Parts included in this policy are subject to the following conditions. A. Cancellation 1. The first Named Insured shown in the Dec larations may cancel this policy by mailing or delivering to us advance written notice of cancellation. 2. We may cancel this policy by mailing or de livering to the first Named Insured written notice of cancellation at least: a. 10 days before the effective date of can cellation if we cancel for nonpayment of premium; or b. 30 days before the effective date of can- cellation if we cancel for any other reason. 3. We will mail or deliver our notice to the first Named lnsured's last mailing address known to us. 4. Notice of cancellation will state the effective date of cancellation. The policy period will end on that date. 5. If this policy is cancelled, we will send the first Named Insured any premium refund due, If we cancel, the refund will be pro rata. If the first Named Insured cancels, the refund may be less than pro rata. The cancellation will be effective even if we have not made or offered a refund. 6. If notice is mailed, proof of mailing will be sufficient proof of notice. B. Changes This policy contains all the agreements between you and us concerning the insurance afforded. The first Named Insured shown in the Declara tions is authorized to make changes in the terms of this policy with our consent. This policy's terms can be amended or waived only by endorsement issued by us and made a part of this policy. C. Examination Of Your Books And Records We may examine and audit your books and records as they relate to this policy at any time during the policy period and up to three years afterward. D. Inspections And Surveys 1. We have the right to: a. Make inspections and surveys at any lirne; b. Give you reports on the conditions we find; and c. Recommend changes. 2. We are not obligated to make any inspections, surveys, reports or recommendations and any such actions we do undertake relate only to insurability and the premiums to be charged. We do not make safety inspections. We do not undertake to perform tne duty of any person or organization to provide for the health or safety of workers or the public. And we do not warrant that conditions: a. Are safe or healthful; or b. Comply with laws, regulations, codes or standards. 3. Paragraphs 1. and 2. of this condition apply not only to us, but also to any rating, ad visory, rate s'!rvice or similar organization which makes Insurance inspections, surveys, reports or recommendations. 4. Paragraph 2. of this condition does not apply to any inspections. surveys, reports or recom mendations we may make relative to certifi cation, under state or municipal statutes, or dinances or regulations, of boilers. pressure vessels or elevators. E. Premiums The first Named Insured shown in the Dec larations: 1. Is responsible for the payment of all premiums; and 2. Will be the payee for any return premiums we pay. F. Transfer Of Your Rights And Duties Under This Policy Your rights and duties under this policy may not be transferred without our written consent except in the case of death of an individual named insured. If you die, your rights and duties will be transferred to your legal representative but only while acting within the scope of duties as your legal representative. Until your legal represen tative is appointed, anyone having proper tem porary custody of your property will have your rights and duties but only with respect to that property. IL00171198 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1998 Page 1 of 1 158 Attachment Code: D590976 Master ID: I 492742 , Certificate ID : 18322155 Coverage Extension Endorsement THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. Policy No . CPO 4289165 -02 This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the: Business Auto Coverage Form Motor Carrier Coverage Form A. Amended Who Is An Insured Effective Date: 09/30/2025 1. The following is added to the Who Is An Insured Provision in Section 11-Covered Autos Liability Coverage: The following are also "insureds": & ZURICH a. Any "employee" of yours is an "insured" while using a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow for acts performed within the scope of employment by you. Any "employee" of yours is also an "insured" while operating an "auto" hired or rented under a contract or agreement in an "employee's" name, with your permission, while performing duties related to the conduct of your business. b . Anyone volunteering services to you is an "insured" while using a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow to transport your clients or other persons in activities necessary to your business. c. Anyone else who furnishes an "auto" referenced in Paragraphs A.1.a. and A.1.b. In this endorsement. d. Where and to the extent permitted by law, any person(s) or organization(s) where required by written contract or written agreement with you executed prior to any "accident", including those person(s) or organization (s ) directing your work pursuant to such written contract or written agreement with you, provided the "acci dent" arises out of operations governed by such contract or agreement and only up to the limits required in the written contract or written agreement, or the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, whichever is less. 2. The following is added to the Other Insurance Condition in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Other Insurance -Primary and Excess Insurance Provisions Condition in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form: Coverage for any person(s) or organization(s), where required by written contract or written agreement with you executed prior to any "accident", will apply on a primary and non-contributory basis and any insurance maintained by the addition:::il "insured'' will apply on an excess basis. However , in no event will this coverage extend beyond the terms and conditions of the Coverage Form. B. Amendment -Supplementary Payments Paragraphs a.(2) and a.(4) of the Coverage Extensions Provisio n in Section II -Covered Autos Liability Coverage are replaced by the following: (2) Up to $5,000 for the cost of bail bonds (including bonds for related traffic law violations) required because of an "accident" we cover. We do not have to furnish these bonds. (4) All reasonable expenses incurred by the "insured" at our request, including actual loss of earnings up to $500 a day because of time off from work. C. Fellow Employee Coverage The Fellow Employee Exclusion contained in Section II -Covered Autos Liability Coverage does not apply. Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. U-CA-424-H CW (10/21) Page 1 of 6 159 Attachment Code: D590976 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 D. Driver Safety Program Liability and Physical Damage Coverage 1. The following is added to the Racing Exclusion in Section II -Covered Autos Liability Coverage: This exclusion does not apply to covered "autos" participating in a driver safety program event, such as, but not limited to, auto or truck rodeos and other auto or truck agility demonstrations. 2. The following is added to Paragraph 2. in B. Exclusions of Section Ill -Physical Damage Coverage of the Business Auto Coverage Form and Paragraph 2.b. in B. Exclusions of Section IV -Physical Damage Coverage of the Motor Carrier Coverage Form: This exclusion does not apply to covered "autos" participating in a driver safety program event, such as, but not limited to, auto or truck rodeos and other auto or truck agility demonstrations. E. Lease or Loan Gap Coverage The following is added to the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: Lease Or Loan Gap Coverage In the event of a total "loss" to a covered "auto", we will pay any unpaid amount due on the lease or loan for a covered "auto", less: a. Any amount paid under the Physical Damage Coverage Section of the Coverage Form; and b. Any: (1) Overdue lease or loan payments at the time of the "loss"; (2) Financial penalties imposed under a lease for excessive use, abnormal wear and tear or high mileage; (3) Security deposits not returned by the lessor; (4) Costs for extended warranties, credit life insurance, health, accident or disability insurance purchased with the loan or lease; and (5) Carry-over balances from previous leases or loans. F. Towing and Labor Paragraph A.2. of the Physical Damage Coverage Section is replaced by the following: We will pay up to $75 for towing and labor costs incurred each time a covered "auto" that is a "private passenger type", light truck or medium truck is disabled. However, the labor must be performed at the place of disablement. As used in this provision, "private passenger type" means a private passenger or station wagon type "auto" and includes an "auto" of the pickup or van type if not used for business purposes. G. Extended Glass Coverage The following is added to Paragraph A.3.a. of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: If glass must be replaced, the deductible shown in the Declarations will apply. However, if glass can be repaired and is actually repaired rather than replaced, the deductible will be waived. You have the option of having the glass repaired rather than replaced. H. Hired Auto Physical Damage -Increased Loss of Use Expenses The Coverage Extension for Loss Of Use Expenses in the Physical Damage Coverage Section is replaced by the following: • Loss Of Use Expenses For Hired Auto Physical Damage, we will pay expenses for which an "insured" becomes legally responsible to pay for loss of use of a vehicle rented or hired without a driver under a written rental contract or written rental agreement. We will pay for loss of use expenses if caused by: (1) Other than collision only if the Declarations indicate that Comprehensive Coverage is provided for any covered "auto"; Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. U-CA-424-H CW (10/21) Page 2 of 6 160 Attachment Code: D590976 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 (2) Specified Causes Of Loss only if the Declarations indicate that Specified Causes Of Loss Coverage is provided for any covered "auto"; or (3) Collision only if the Declarations indicate that Collision Coverage is provided for any covered "auto". However, the most we will pay for any expenses for loss of use is $100 per day, to a maximum of $3000. I. Personal Effects Coverage The following is added to the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: Personal Effects Coverage a. We will pay up to $750 for "loss" to personal effects which are: (1) Personal property owned by an "insured"; and (2) In or on a covered "auto". b. Subject to Paragraph a. above, the amount to be paid for "loss" to personal effects will be based on the lesser of: (1) The reasonable cost to replace; or (2) The actual cash value. c. The coverage provided in Paragraphs a. and b. above, only applies in the event of a total theft of a covered "auto". No deductible applies to this coverage. However, we will not pay for "loss" to personal effects of any of the following: (1) Accounts, bills, currency, deeds, evidence of debt, money, notes, securities, or commercial paper or other documents of value. (2) Bullion, gold, silver, platinum, or other precious alloys or metals; furs or fur garments; jewelry, watches, precious or semi-precious stones. (3) Paintings, statuary and other works of art. (4) Contraband or property in the course of illegal transportation or trade. (5) Tapes, records, discs or other similar devices used with audio, visual or data electronic equipment. Any coverage provided by this Provision is excess over any other insurance coverage available for the same "loss". J. Tapes, Records and Discs Coverage 1. The Exclusion in Paragraph B.4.a. of Section Ill -Physical Damage Coverage in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Exclusion in Paragraph B.2.c. of Section IV -Physical Damage Coverage in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form does not apply. 2. The following is added to Paragraph 1.a. Comprehensive Coverage under the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: We will pay for "loss" to tapes, records, discs or other similar devices used with audio, visual or data electronic equipment. We will pay only if the tapes, records, discs or other similar audio, visual or data electronic devices: (a) Are the property of an "insured"; and (b) Are in a covered "auto" at the time of "loss". The most we will pay for such "loss" to tapes, records, discs or other similar devices is $500. The Physical Damage Coverage Deductible Provision does not apply to such "loss". K. Airbag Coverage The Exclusion in Paragraph B.3.a, of Section 111-Physical Damage Coverage in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Exclusion in Paragraph B.4.a. of Section IV -Physical Damage Coverage in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form does not apply to the accidental discharge of an airbag. L. Two or More Deductibles The following is added to the Deductible Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. U-CA-424-H CW (10/21) Page 3 of 6 161 Attachment Code: D590976 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 If an accident is covered both by this policy or Coverage Form and by another policy or Coverage Form issued to you by us, the following applies for each covered "auto" on a per vehicle basis: 1. If the deductible on this policy or Coverage Form is the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be waived; or 2. If the deductible on this policy or Coverage Form is not the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be reduced by the amount of the smaller (or smallest) deductible. M. Temporary Substitute Autos• Physical Damage 1. The following is added to Section I -Covered Autos: Temporary Substitute Autos. Physical Damage If Physical Damage Coverage is provided by this Coverage Form on your owned covered "autos", the following types of vehicles are also covered "autos" for Physical Damage Coverage: Any "auto" you do not own when used with the permission of its owner as a temporary substitute for a covered "auto" you do own but is out of service because of its: 1. Breakdown; 2. Repair; 3. Servicing; 4. "Loss"; or 5. Destruction. 2. The following is added to the Paragraph A. Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: Temporary Substitute Autos• Physical Damage We will pay the owner for "loss" to the temporary substitute "auto" unless the "loss" results from fraudulent acts or omissions on your part. If we make any payment to the owner, we will obtain the owner's rights against any other party. The deductible for the temporary substitute "auto" will be the same as the deductible for the covered "auto" it replaces. N. Amended Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim, Suit Or Loss Paragraph a. of the Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim, Suit Or Loss Condition is replaced by the following: a. In the event of "accident", claim, "suit" or "'loss", you must give us or our authorized representative prompt notice of the "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss". However, these duties only apply when the "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" is known to you (if you are an individual), a partner (if you are a partnership), a member (if you are a limited liability company) of' an executive officer or insurance manager (if you are a corporation). The failure of any agent, servant or employee of the "insured" to notify us of any "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" shall not invalidate the Insurance afforded by this policy. Include, as soon as practicable: (1) How, when and where the "accident" or "loss" occurred and if a claim is made or "suit" is brought, written notice of the claim or "suit" including,. but not limited to, the date and details of such claim or "suit"; (2) The "insured's" name and address; and (3) To the extent possible, the names and addresses of any injured persons and witnesses. If you report an "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" to another insurer when you should have reported to us, your failure to report to us will not be seen as a violation of these amended duties provided you give us notice as soon as practicable after the fact of the delay becomes known to you. 0. Waiver of Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us Includes copyrighted material of ln_surance Services Office, Inc., with its pennission. U-CA-424-H CW (10121) Page4of6 162 Attachment Code: D590976 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 This Condition does not apply to the extent required of you by a written contract, executed prior to any "accident" or "loss", provided that the "accident" or "loss" arises out of operations contemplated by such contract. This waiver only applies to the person or organization designated in the contract P. Employee Hired Autos -Physical Damage Paragraph b. of the Other Insurance Condition in the Business Auto Coverage Form and Paragraph f. of the Other Insurance-Primary and Excess Insurance Provisions Condition in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form are replaced by the following: For Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage, the following are deemed to be covered "autos" you own: (1) Any covered "auto" you lease, hire, rent or borrow; and (2) Any covered "auto" hired or rented under a written contract or written agreement entered into by an "employee" or elected or appointed official with your permission while being operated within the course and scope of that "employee's" employment by you or that elected or appointed official's duties as respect their obligations to you. However, any "auto" that is leased, hired, rented or borrowed with a driver is not a covered "auto". Q. Unintentional Failure to Disclose Hazards The following is added to the Concealment, Misrepresentation Or Fraud Condition: However, we will not deny coverage under this Coverage Form if you unintentionally: (1) Fail to disclose any hazards existing at the inception date of this Coverage Form; or (2) Make an error, omission, improper description of "autos" or other misstatement of information. You must notify us as soon as possible after the discovery of any hazards or any other information that was not provided to us prior to the acceptance of this policy. R. Hired Auto -World Wide Coverage Paragraph 7.b.(5) of the Policy Period, Coverage Territory Condition is replaced by the following: (5) Anywhere else in the world if a covered "auto" is leased, hired, rented or borrowed for a period of 60 days or less, S. Bodily Injury Redefined The definition of "bodily injury" in the Definitions Section is replaced by the following: "Bodily injury" means bodily injury, sickness or disease, sustained by a person including death or mental anguish, resulting from any of these at any lime. Mental anguish means any type of mental or emotional illness or disease. T. Expected Or Intended Injury The Expected Or Intended Injury Exclusion in Paragraph B. Exclusions under Section II -Covered Auto Liability Coverage is replaced by the following: Expected Or Intended Injury "Bodily injury" or "property damage" expected or intended from the standpoint of the "insured". This exclusion does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" resulting from the use of reasonable force to protect persons or property. U. Physical Damage -Additional Temporary Transportation Expense Coverage Paragraph A.4.a. of Section Ill -Physical Damage Coverage is replaced by the following: 4. Coverage Extensions a. Transportation Expenses We will pay up to $50 per day to a maximum of $1,000 for temporary transportation expense incurred by you because of the total theft of a covered "auto" of the private passenger type. We will pay only for those covered "autos" for which you carry either Comprehensive or Specified Causes of Loss Coverage. We will --•• :C--,. _______ , ,. ______ ....,_,: ___ ,, ______ l--••---....1 ,.J,,_; __ ,.1-,,_ ---t-..J 1,,. __ ; __ ; __ AO l-.-••---A--41--,1-._.u, Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. U-CA-424-H CW (10/21) Page 5 of 6 163 Attachment Code: D590976 Master lD: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 V. Replacement of a Private Passenger Auto with a Hybrid or Alternative Fuel Source Auto The following is added to Paragraph A. Coverage of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: In the event of a total "loss .. to a covered "auto" of the private passenger type that is replaced with a hybrid "auto" or "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source of the private passenger type, we will pay an additional 10% of the cost of the replacement "auto"', excluding taxi title1 license1 other fees and any aftermarket vehicle upgrades, up to a maximum of $2500. The covered "auto" must be replaced by a hybrid "auto" or an "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source within 60 calendar days of the payment of the "loss" and evidenced by a bill of sale or new vehicle lease agreement. To qualify as a hybrid "auto", the "'auto" must be powered by a conventional gasoline engine and another source of propulsion power. The other source of propulsion power must be electric, hydrogen, propane, solar or natural gas, either compressed or liquefied. To qualify as an "auto .. powered by an alternative fuel source, the "'auto" must be powered by a source of propulsion power other than a conventional gasoline engine. An "auto" solely propelled by biofuel, gasoline or diesel fuel or any blend thereof is not an "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source. W. Return of Stolen Automobile The following is added to the Coverage Extension Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section: If a covered "auto" is stolen and recovered, we will pay the cost of transport to return the "auto" to you. We will pay only for those covered "autos" for which you carry either Comprehensive or Specified Causes of Loss Coverage. Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. U-CA-424-H CW (10/21) Page 6 of 6 164 Attachment Code: D591616 Master JD: 1492742, Certificate JD: 18322155 POLICY NUMBER: CPO 4289165 -02 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT COMMERCIAL AUTO CA04441013 WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by the endorsement. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated Named Insured: LSA Associates, Inc. Endorsement Effective Date: 9/30/2025 SCHEDULE Name(s) Of Person(s) Or Organlzation(s): ALL PERSONS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT WITH THE INSURED, EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT OR LOSS, THAT WAIVER OF SUBROGATION BE PROVIDED UNDER THIS POLICY Information renuired to comolete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. The Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us condition does not apply to the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only to the extent that subrogation is waived prior-to the "accident" or the "loss" under a contract with that person or organization. CA04441013 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2011 Page 1 of 1 165 Attachment Code: D590979 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: I 8322155 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT WC000313 (Ed. 04-84) We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule. Schedule ALL PERSONS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT WITH THE INSURED, EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT OR LOSS, THAT WAIVER OF SUBROGATION BE PROVIDED UNDER THIS POLICY FOR WORK PERFORMED BY YOU FOR THAT PERSON AND/OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. (The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective 9/30/2025 Policy No. WC 5665125 -02 Endorsement No. Insured LSA Associates, Inc. Premium $ Insurance Company American Zurich Insurance Company Countersigned by ___________ _ WC124 (4-84) WC000313 Copyright 1983 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Page 1 of 1 166 Attachment Code: D635436 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 POLICY NUMBER: CPO 4289165 -02 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 37 0413 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED -OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS -COMPLETED OPERATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s) Location And Description Of Completed Operations Any person or organization, other than an architect, Any location or project, other than a wrap-up or other engineer or surveyor, whom you are required to add as consolidated insurance program location or project, for an additional insured under this policy under a written which insurance is otherwise separately provided to contract mark or written agreement executed prior to you by a wrap-up or other consolidated insurance loss. program., Any location or project, other than a wrap-up or other consolidated insurance program location or project, for which insurance is otherwise separately provided to you by a wrap-up or other consolidated insurance program. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II -Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work" at the location designated and described in the Schedule of this endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products-completed operations hazard". However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is requiredby a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section Ill -Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or 2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. CG20370413 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of 1 167 Attachment Code: D636736 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 POLICY NUMBER: CPO 4289165 -02 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG20100413 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED -OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS -SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Oraanizationls) Locationls\ Of Covered Operations Any person or organization, other than an architect, Any Location or project, other than a wrap-up or other engineer or surveyor, whom you are required to add as an consolidated insurance program location or project for additional insured under this policy under _a written contract which insurance is otherwise separately provided to you or written aareement executed orior to loss. bv Information reouired to comolete this Schedule if not shown above will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II -Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions: or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above. However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2 • 11J'c~lYir~'il%'\,PJ0c'ilRn-~JpJp~~iilii'l!li~! llw,ured is insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional Insureds, the following additional exclusions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. CG 2010 0413 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of2 168 Attachment Code: D636736 Master ID: 1492742, Certificate ID: 18322155 C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section Ill -Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or 2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. CG20100413 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 2 of2 169 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CEQA SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on-call environmental CEQA services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULT ANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULT ANT as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULT ANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULT ANT hereby designates Terri Avila who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULT ANT in the performance of this Agreement. 26-17867/408340 I of 11 170 3. TERM· TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULT ANT are to commence on April 5, 2026 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks speeified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than one year from the Commeneement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A II are generally to be shown in Exhibit II A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULT ANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSULTANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit 11 B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY reqmres additional services not included in Exhibit "A II or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A, 11 CONSULT ANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit 11 B.11 26-17867/408340 2 of 11 171 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULT ANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULT ANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS A. CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSUL TANT's ( or CONSULT ANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent ( or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULT ANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULT ANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSUL TANT. B. To the extent that CONSULT ANT performs "Design Professional Services" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.8, then the following Hold Harmless provision applies in place of subsection A above: 26-17867/408340 3 of 11 172 "CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) to the extent that the claims against CONSULT ANT arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULT ANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT exceed CONSULTANT's proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more other defendants to the claims and/or litigation is unable to pay its share of defense costs due lo bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, CONSULT ANT shall meet and confer with CITY and other defendants regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in California Civil Code Section 2782.8. C. Regardless of whether subparagraph A or B applies, CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification lo be provided by CONSULT ANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSUL TANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance 26-11867/408340 4 of 11 173 policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSUL TANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULT ANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULT ANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of al least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSULT ANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSUL TANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTll'ICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULT ANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: 26-17867/408340 A. B. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; state that the policy is currently in force; and 5 of 11 174 C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (I 0) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSUL TANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULT ANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULT ANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSUL TANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder al any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULT ANT as provided herein. In the 26-17867/408340 6 of 11 175 event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its properly and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and IO hcreinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULT ANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULT ANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, ce1iificates or other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail-return receipt requested: 26-17867/408340 7 of 11 176 TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Director of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT TO CONSULT ANT: Environmental Science Associates ATTN: Terri Avila 633 West 5th Street, Suite 380 Los Angeles, CA 90071 When CITY's consent/approval is required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or 26-17867/408340 8 of 11 177 neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrmy to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delive1y, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULT ANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSUL TANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 26-17867/408340 9 of 11 178 24. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that pmty or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this 26-17867/408340 IO of 11 179 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. 26-17867/408340 11 of 11 180 CONSUL TANT, ENVIRONMENT AL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES print name ITS: (circ e one) Chnirman/Prcsidc11:,itl;,;,;;;§;;:;;;.;~· L'.---c,.---:-:--=:c---- lTS: (circle one) Secreta')I Ch cf Financial Orficcr/Asst. Secretary~ Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State or Califomia Mayor City Clerk INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Community Development REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: p-{,,~ f-.,, City Attorney 26-17867/408340 12 of 11 181 CONSULT ANT, ENVIRONMENT AL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES By:. _____________ _ print name ITS: (circle one) Chairman/President/Vice President AND By: _____________ _ print name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/ Asst. Sccretat)' w Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California Mayor City Clerk Directbl' of/Community Development REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: fl-..-City Attorney 26-17867/408340 12 of 11 182 A. EXHIBIT "A" STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) CONSUL TANT shall provide consulting services on an "as-needed" basis for projects to be determined during the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY shall issue task orders based upon scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to City for its review and approval B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT B C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Furnish scope of work request for each project 2. Prepare associated reimbursement agreements and collect developer payments in a timely manner in conjunction with projects assigned. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by City. EXHIBIT A 183 EXHIBIT A rESA City of Huntington Beach On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Community Development Department February 12, 2026 RFQ #2026-0115 Project Director: Terri Avila 310.713.9556 I tavila@esassoc.com Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 184 ESA .~ February 12, 2026 SECTION A Cover Letter City of Huntington Beach -Community Development Department Attention: Alyssa Salazar, Buyer 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 420 Exchange, Suite 260 Irvine, CA 92602 949.753.7001 phone 949,753,7002 fax esassoc.com Subject: Request for Qualifications for On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services Dear Ms. Salazar: Huntington Beach continues to navigate the complex intersection of growth, redevelopment, environmental stewardship, and community identity within a highly visible coastal setting. As the City advances projects that must respond to evolving regulatory requirements, public scrutiny, and long-standing community values, thoughtful and technically sound environmental review remains a critical tool for informed decision-making. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has supported the City of Huntington Beach in this effort for more than a decade as part of the City's environmental on-call team (and over a decade longer, considering the tenure both Terri Avila and Ruta Thomas have worked with the City prior to their time at ESA). During this time, we have worked closely with City staff to prepare a wide range of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents and technical studies, developing a strong understanding of the City's planning framework, environmental challenges and goals, its coastal context, and community priorities. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this Statement of Qualifications to continue providing on-call environmental consulting services to the City. Huntington Beach faces a range of planning and environmental challenges, including redevelopment and infill development in largely built-out areas, projects within and near the coastal zone, sea-level rise and climate adaptation, preservation of biological and cultural resources, mobility and public safety, and the provision of parks and community facilities. Many of these projects are high-profile and generate significant public interest, underscoring the need for clear, defensible, and well-communicated environmental analyses. ESA is well positioned to support the City in addressing these challenges. As a 100 percent employee owned, California-based firm with more than 55 years of experience, ESA's core practice is the preparation of CEQA compliance documents and associated technical studies. Our multidisciplinary team includes in-house specialists in air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, noise, biology, Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 185 Page2 February 12, 2026 cultural and tribal cultural resources, geology and hazards, hydrology and water quality, traffic and transportation, and coastal planning. This integrated structure allows us to efficiently tailor the level of environmental review to each project while maintaining legal defensibility and cost-effective delivery. ESA's experience in Huntington Beach is extensive and current. Recent work includes preparation of the Pacific Airshow Environmental Impact Report, acquisition of the Pacific Airshow Coastal Development Permit, the Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California -Symphony of the Flowers Project, and ongoing environmental support for redevelopment, infrastructure, and special event projects. Through this work, ESA has developed strong working relationships with City staff and a nuanced understanding of local issues, community concerns, and Coastal Act considerations. On-call services will be led by Project Director Terri Avila, who brings nearly 40 years of experience guiding CEQA strategy for complex planning, infrastructure, and coastal development projects throughout Southern California, including decades of work in Huntington Beach. Day-to-day project execution will be managed by Brian Allee, who will serve as the City's primary point of contact and will oversee coordination across technical disciplines. Together, they will provide consistent oversight, proactive communication, and rigorous quality assurance/quality control for each task order, as they have demonstrated in the recent past. ESA's approach emphasizes early coordination, clear scoping, and a "right hammer for the right nail" philosophy, providing the appropriate level of environmental review to meet CEQA requirements while supporting efficient project processing. Our track record reflects a strong history of preparing clearly written and defensible environmental documents that withstand legal challenge. The enclosed Statement of Qualifications demonstrates our relevant experience, proposed staffing, technical capabilities, and commitment to responsive service. ESA is prepared to execute the City's professional services agreement and comply with all contractual and insurance requirements. ESA's consultant fees and hourly rates, as included in this submittal, will be valid for a period of at least 180 days from the date of submission. We look forward to continuing our long-standing partnership with the City of Huntington Beach in support of its planning and environmental goals. Please don't hesitate to contact Terri Avila at tavila@esassoc.com or 213.599.4300. Terri Avila Project Director/Vice President Attachment: Vendor Application Forms Brian Allee Project Manager Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 186 TYPE OF APPLICANT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM □NEW ~ CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Contact Person for Agreement: _T_e_rr_i _A_v_ila_,_V_i_ce_P_re_s_id_e_n_t __________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 633 West 5th Street, Suite 830 City, State and Zip Code: Los Angeles, CA 90071 E-Mail Address: tavila@esassoc.com Phone: 213.599.4300 Fax: 213.599.4301 Contact Person for Proposals: _T_e_r_r_i _A_v_il_a _______________ _ Title: Vice President (Project Director) E-Mail Address: tavila@esassoc.com Business Fax: 21 3.599.4301 Business Telephone: 213.299.4 300 Year Business was Established: 1969 ~~------ Is your business: ( check one) 0 NON PROFIT CORPORATION ~ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: ( check one) ~ CORPORATION 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 PARTNERSHIP 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 0 SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP 0 UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION l of2 187 Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Title The table on the following pages contains the names, titres, and phone numbers for the Phone requested persons. Federal Tax Identification Number: 94-1698350 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: A2999308 (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 2/28/2026 2 of2 188 ESA Board Members, Officers, and Authorized Contract Signers I Leslie Moulton-Post Maury Ballif Keith Steele Eric Haase Lisa Kay Brian Boxer Alisa Moore Ruta Thomas Amy Weeden Martin Staubus Darrell Teat Tad Widby Lauren Abom Jon Ambrose Mike Arnold Terri Avila Tom Barnes Christie Beeman Ann Borgonovo Eryn Brennan February 12, 2026 Board Members, Officers, and Authorized Contract Signers Board Member; President & CEO Chief Financial Officer: Treasurer and Secretary; Senior Vice President Board Member; Vice President Chief Operating Officer; Senior Vice President Chief Growth Officer; Senior Vice President Board Member; Senior Vice President; Northern California Regional Director Board Member; Senior Vice President Board Member; Senior Vice President; Southern California Regional Director Outside Board Member Outside Board Member Outside Board Member Outside Board Member !VN mm tMTU ttmm1-·m11 E\ ii I (¥1 I •I Vt/Mi IM wmmtmt®'IM Senior Vice President Principal Associate Senior Vice President Vice President Vice President Environmental Hydrology Director Senior Vice President Vice President 415.896.5900 415.896.5900 503.274.2010 415.896.5900 619.719.4200 916.564.4500 415.896.5900 213.599.4300 Outside Director Outside Director Outside Director Outside Director 510.839.5066 206.789.9658 407.403.6300 213.599.4300 213.599.4300 510.839.5066 415.896.5900 415.896.5900 City of Huntington Beach/ On~Call Erwironmental Consulting Services c-nvlron111cn1al science assock1\es 189 Vendor Form (attachment) Board Members, Officers, and Authorized Contract Signers Barbra Calantas Vice President 619.719.4200 Jeff Caton Vice President 510,839.5066 Michael Chidley Regional Operations Director 206.789,9658 Dan Dameron Vice President 916.564.4500 Erich Fischer Senior Vice President 916.564.4500 Cameron Fisher Vice President 206.789,9658 Chris Fitzer Vice President 916,564.4500 Mike Leech Vice President 206.789.9658 Cathy McEfee Vice President 916,564.4500 Sharon Niemczyk Vice President 407.403.6300 JimO'Toole Senior Vice President 707.795,0900 Tony Overly Vice President 916,564.4500 Meredith Parkin Vice President 916.564.4500 Doug Skurski Senior Vice President 407.403,6300 Julie Sullivan Senior Vice President 407.403,6300 Christopher Warn Vice President 407.403.6300 fmm·2 esassoc.com 190 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICANT: □NEW ~ CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Fehr & Peers Contact Person for Agreement: _S_t_ev_e_n_J_. _B_ro_w_n_,_P_E ____________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 600 City, State and Zip Code: Walnut Creek, CA 94596 E-Mail Address: S.Brown@fehrandpeers.com Phone: 949-308-6321 Fax: ---------- Contact Person for Proposals: _R_e_b_e_c_c_a_M_o_lin_a _____________ _ Title: Marketing Coordinator E-Mail Address: R.Molina@fehrandpeers.com Business Telephone: 951-289 -4835 Business Fax: ------- Year Business was Established: _19_8_5 ____ _ Is your business: (check one) 0 NON PROFIT CORPORATION ~ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: (check one) ~ CORPORATION 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 PAR1NERSHIP 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PAR1NERSHIP 0 SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP . □ UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION I of2 191 Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Chris Breiland Christine Shields Steven J. Brown Sarah Brandenberg Meghan Mitman Federal Tax Identification Number: Title Technical Principal In Charge Secretary Senior Vice President Regional Principal In Charge Regional Princlpal fn Charge 68-0065540 Phone 206-576-4217 925-977-3205 949-308-6321 213-261-3075 925-357-3401 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: A323280 (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 10/31/2026 2 of2 192 SECTION B Background and Experience Firm Bio ESA is a 100 percent employee-owned, California-based corporation with more than 750 staff in offices throughout the West Coast and the Southeast. For 55 years, our environmental planners have employed their technical command of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to prepare environmental documentation and provide strategic support for compliance with environmental regulations, Our core business is the preparation of CEQA and NEPA compliance documents including initial studies, negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, environmental assessments, environmental impact reports, environmental impact statements, as well as the associated supporting technical studies. Our team is composed of environmental planners and technical specialists in the fields of air quality, archaeology, biology, geology/environmental hazards, geographic information systems (GIS), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, historic resources, hydrology, landscape architecture, noise and vibration, paleontology, sustainability and climate, traffic, tribal cultural resources (including Assembly Bill [AB] 52 facilitation), and water quality to prepare the necessary technical analyses to support a range of environmental compliance documents. Local Experience ESA brings more than a decade of continuous experience supporting the City of Huntington Beach as part of the City's environmental on-call team, having served in this role since 2015, During this time, ESA has prepared a wide range of environmental documents and technical studies in close coordination with City staff, developing a strong understanding of the City's planning framework, regulatory environment, and community priorities. Our long-standing working relationships with City staff, combined with our technical expertise and responsiveness, have allowed us to efficiently support redevelopment, infill, and infrastructure projects while helping the City balance growth with the preservation of its distinctive beach community character, natural resources, and quality of life. ESA's work in Huntington Beach is grounded in a deep familiarity with the City's General Plan, specific plans, coastal context, and planning considerations, including redevelopment in largely built-out areas, development within and near the coastal zone, sea-level rise, preservation of cultural and biological resources, mobility and public safety, and the provision of parks and community facilities, These issues are well understood by ESA's employee-owners, many of whom live in, have lived in, or regularly spend time in Huntington Beach, fostering a genuine appreciation for the City's "Surf City" identity and sense of place, As Huntington Beach continues to implement its long-term vision for a healthy, safe, and vibrant community, ESA remains committed to providing thoughtful, technically sound environmental services that support the City's goals while protecting the resources and character valued by residents today and in the future. Legal Challenges ESA's frequent involvement with complex and high-profile projects that are often controversial and garner enthusiastic community opposition or concern means that our high-quality work is subject to 3 On-Call Environmental Services RFQI# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 193 legal challenge on occasion. To date, no approved or certified ESA document has been invalidated by the courts due to errors of negligence by ESA or its subconsultants, which brings us to a 100 percent success rate in terms of holding up to legal challenges brought forward on our documents. ESA is not a party to nor engaged in any active or pending lawsuits that would impede our ability to successfully deliver work for the City. Project Management ESA will provide flexible, responsive CEQA services aligned with the City's on-call needs, with staffing and technical expertise assigned based on the requirements of each task order. Projects will be overseen by Project Director Terri Avila, who will offer strategic guidance, broad-based planning and environmental expertise, and oversight of ESA's quality assurance/quality control program. Day to-day project execution will be led by Brian Allee, serving as Project Manager and primary point of contact for the City, supporting coordination across technical disciplines and consistent communication throughout the project lifecycle. ESA's approach emphasizes developing a thorough understanding of each project at the outset to support appropriate scoping, efficient scheduling, and cost-conscious delivery. Following project authorization, ESA will collaborate with the City to refine the project description, confirm key parameters of the environmental analysis, and identify the appropriate level of CEQA documentation. ESA applies an approach focused on providing the appropriate level of environmental review for each project, balancing the need for legally defensible analysis with practical time and budget considerations while avoiding unnecessary or duplicative technical work. Environmental documentation will be prepared by a multidisciplinary team of in-house technical specialists with expertise across CEQA resource areas. Clear communication within project teams and with the public is a core element of ESA's process and supports the preparation of concise, understandable documents that facilitate informed decision-making. Disciplined project management practices, proactive budget and schedule monitoring, and a multi-level QA/QC review process contribute to the preparation of high-quality, technically sound environmental documents responsive to the City's needs. Achieving Client Satisfaction ESA's approach to achieving client satisfaction is grounded in our, deep history with the City, spanning over 20 years, proven track-record of successfully completing environmental documents addressing a wide variety of variety of projects, understanding of the City's planning context, wide bench of technical expertise, and the disciplined project management methods and controls described above and have demonstrate in practice over the years. For on-call assignments, ESA emphasizes responsiveness, clear communication, and flexibility, recognizing that project priorities, schedules, and staffing needs may evolve over time. Client satisfaction is supported through consistent leadership and oversight. Terri Avila will serve as Project Director for all projects for all on-call assignments, providing continuity, institutional knowledge, and quality assurance across CEQA documents prepared for the City. Day-to-day coordination will be led by Brian Allee, who will maintain regular communication with City staff regarding scope, schedule, budget, and deliverables, and will promptly address questions or direction as projects progress. 4 On-Call Environmental Services RFQll 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.corn 194 ESA is committed to producing clear, well-organized, and understandable environmental documents that facilitate efficient staff review, informed decision-making, and effective public communication. Our team works collaboratively with City staff to confirm expectations at the outset of each task order, proactively identify and resolve issues, and tailor the level of environmental analysis to the needs of each project. Through this approach, ESA supports timely project delivery while maintaining the technical rigor and legal defensibility required under CEQA. SECTION C Staffing ESA will provide flexible, responsive staffing to support the City's on-call environmental consulting needs, with personnel assigned based on the requirements of each task order. The following outlines key individuals and subconsultants who will support CEQA services for the City of Huntington Beach. One-page resumes for key staff are provided in Attachment 1. An organizational chart illustrating additional technical support staff available to the City is included in Attachment 2. Key Staff Terri Avila I Project Director Terri Avila is a Project Director with nearly 40 years of experience leading CEQA compliance for complex planning, infrastructure, and coastal development projects throughout Southern California. She has served as project director and strategic advisor for numerous cities, including extensive work for the City of Huntington Beach on waterfront, mixed-use, hotel, and redevelopment projects. Terri is frequently relied upon by city staff to guide CEQA strategy, oversee multidisciplinary teams, and deliver legally defensible documents for high-profile, publicly scrutinized projects. Brian Allee I Project Manager Brian Allee is a Project Manager with more than 20 years of experience managing CEQA compliance and entitlement processes for cities throughout Orange County and Southern California. He has served as the City's primary day-to-day point of contact on multiple City of Huntington Beach projects, including preparation of Environmental Impact Reports (El Rs} and Addenda for large public events and park uses. Brian is known for his hands-on project management style, close coordination with city staff and agencies, and ability to keep complex, high-profile projects on schedule and within budget. Alan Sako, LEED AP BD•C I Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, and Noise Alan Sako is a senior technical lead with more than 24 years of experience preparing and defending CEQA air quality, greenhouse gas, energy, and noise analyses for cities throughout Southern California. He has led complex technical studies for urban and coastal jurisdictions, including work in Huntington Beach on highly scrutinized remediation and redevelopment projects such as the ASCON Landfill Site. Alan is frequently relied upon by city staff for technically rigorous, legally defensible analyses and clear responses to agency and public comments. 5 On-Call Environmental Seivices RFQI# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 195 Maile Tanaka I Biological Resources Maile Tanaka is a Principal Biologist with 20 years of experience supporting CEQA compliance for cities and public agencies throughout Orange County and Southern California. Her work includes biological resources sections for El Rs, focused special-status species surveys, jurisdictional delineations, and construction and mitigation monitoring for complex urban and coastal projects. Maile has led biological efforts for projects in Huntington Beach and surrounding coastal communities, including habitat restoration and living shoreline projects requiring close coordination with city staff and resource agencies. Kyle Garcia I Cultural Resources/Paleontology Kyle Garcia is a Principal Archaeologist with more than 20 years of experience supporting CEQA compliance for cities and public agencies throughout Orange County and Southern California. He has led cultural and paleontological resources assessments, Native American coordination, and construction monitoring for a wide range of urban and coastal infrastructure projects, including work in Huntington Beach and surrounding communities. Kyle is known for his practical, solution oriented approach that helps cities maintain compliance while minimizing construction delays during resource discoveries. Michael Burns, CHG, CEG, PG, QSD I Geology, Hazardous Materials, Stormwater, Hydrology and Water Quality Michael Burns is a Principal Geologist with more than 30 years of experience supporting CEQA compliance for cities and public agencies throughout Southern California. He provides senior technical oversight for geology, seismic hazards, hydrology, stormwater, and water quality analyses for urban, coastal, and infrastructure projects, including complex redevelopment and water-related facilities. Michael is frequently relied upon by cities to address challenging site constraints, sea level rise considerations, and stormwater and groundwater issues in a clear, defensible manner. SubconsultantSupport Contact: Steven J. Brown, P.E., Senior Vice President (949) 306-3308 I s.brown@fehrandpeers.com Fehr&Peers ESA has partnered with Fehr & Peers as our primary traffic and transportation subconsultant throughout our tenure on the City of Huntington Beach's environmental on-call team. Fehr & Peers provides traffic, transportation, and mobility analysis services in support of CEQA and planning efforts, including vehicle miles traveled, intersection operations, multimodal analysis, and transportation demand management strategies. Together, ESA and Fehr & Peers have successfully delivered integrated CEQA and transportation analyses for the City of Huntington Beach, including the Pacific Airshow EIR and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and the Addendum to the Final Master EIR for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California - Symphony of the Flowers Project. This long-standing teaming relationship has resulted in efficient coordination, consistent methodologies, and high-quality technical deliverables that align with City standards and expectations, allowing ESA to provide seamless environmental services to City staff. 6 On-Call Environmental Seivices RFQI# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 196 SECTION D Qualifications and References The following describes ESA's project qualifications, with emphasis on recent and ongoing work within the last five years, including identified key staff and subconsultants that participated in each. Huntington Beach Pacific Airshow EIR, Pacific Airshow, LLC I 2023-2025 Key staff: Terri Avila, Brian Allee, Alan Sako, Kyle Garcia, Amanda French Project Description: ESA prepared the EIR for the Pacific Airshow, a recurring, spectacle-scale airshow event in Huntington Beach featuring civilian and military aircraft flybys, aerial acrobatics, air racing, and a wide range of temporary ground-based displays and visitor-serving activities. The EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects of annual three-to five-day events, including aircraft practice flights occurring earlier in the week, and the installation and removal of temporary infrastructure and entertainment uses. ESA's work supported the City of Huntington Beach's review of an event program allowing continuation of the Airshow for up to ten additional years, from 2024 through 2035, under the City's Specific Event Permit process. Client Reference Information: Kevin Elliot, CEO I 714.719.2887 I kevin@codefour.com Huntington Beach Pacific Airshow Coastal Development Permitting, Pacific Airshow, LLC I February 2025 - September 2025 Key staff: Terri Avila, Brian Allee, Eli Davidian, Shannon Fiala, Alan Sako, Amanda French Project Description: ESA provided environmental planning support for the Pacific Airshow CDP, evaluating the consistency of a recurring, temporary airshow event with California Coastal Act policies. The Project includes annual three-to five-day events in Huntington Beach featuring aircraft flybys and demonstrations, emerging aviation and mobility technology displays, and temporary visitor-serving amenities such as viewing areas, entertainment, and concessions. ESA's work supported review and approval of a CDP by the California Coastal Commission for continuation of the Pacific Airshow for up to five additional years through 2029. Client Reference Information: Kevin Elliot, CEO I 714.719.2887 I kevin@codefour.com Addendum to the Final Master Plan EIR for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California -Symphony of Flowers I October 2024 - September 2025 Key staff: Terri Avila, Brian Allee, Alan Sako, Maile Tanaka, Kyle Garcia Project Description: ESA prepared an EIR Addendum for the Symphony of the Flowers ~roject, a temporary multimedia event featuring a large-scale illuminated flower display and choreographed light and music show viewed from temporary bleachers. The EIR Addendum evaluated the potential environmental effects associated with the installation, operation, and removal of temporary 7 On-Call Environmental Seivices RFQI# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 197 structures and features, including aluminum bleachers accommodating up to 2,062 spectators, lighting and sound equipment, luminous LED flowers, pathways, a water fountain and basin, and visitor-serving amenities. ESA's analysis addressed the temporary nature of the Project, short-term visitor attendance, and limited ground disturbance associated with the manual installation of programmable LED flower elements, and concluded that potential impacts could be reduced to less than-significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures. Client Reference Information: Jennifer Villaseno, Director, Community Development I 714.374.1661 I jvi !lase n or@su rfcity-h b. org Back Bay Landing EIR, Addendum & Supplemental EIR, Newport Beach I 2014, 2016, 2025 -2026 Key staff: Alan Sako, Kyle Garcia Project Description: ESA prepared an EIR for the proposed Back Bay Landing project located on a waterfront property in Upper Newport Bay, addressing land use approvals for a mixed-use waterfront development on a seven-acre site. The EIR covered key issues such as aesthetics, biological resources, historic resources, hydrology, land use, and traffic. In 2016, at the request of the City, ESA prepared an Addendum to the Certified Back Bay Landing Project EIR to address changes requested by the California Coastal Commission. Throughout the project, ESA demonstrated a strong commitment to adhering to the established schedule and budget, ensuring timely progress and efficient use of City's resources. In April 2025, ESA began preparation of a Supplemental EIR for the Back Bay Landing and Bayside Marina Improvement Project to address infrastructure improvements necessary to facilitate implementation of the future mixed-use project. Client Reference Information: Joselyn Perez, Senior Planner I 949.644.3226 I jperez@newportbeachca.gov On-Call Environmental Services, City of Long Beach I 2015 -2029 Key staff: Terri Avila Project Description: Since 2015, ESA has provided on-call environmental planning and CEQA services for the City of Long Beach Community Development Department, supporting a wide range of public and private development projects throughout the City. ESA's work has included preparation of CEQA documents (El Rs, MNDs, and Addenda), technical studies for biological, cultural and historic resources, noise, air quality, and tribal cultural resources, as well as peer review and plan-and policy-level consistency analyses. Representative projects completed under the on-call include environmental review for the Goodman Commerce Center industrial development, the Alamitos Bay Water Quality Enhancement Project EIR, the Mosaic Development programmatic EIR Addendum, and numerous urban infill, mixed-use, commercial, residential, waterfront, signage, and adaptive reuse projects. Across these efforts, ESA has worked closely with City staff to deliver timely, defensible environmental analysis that supports efficient project processing while maintaining full CEQA compliance. Client Reference Information: Christopher Koontz, Director, Long Beach Community Development Department I 562.570.6288 I Christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov 8 On-Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc,com 198 On-Call CEOA/ NEPA Services, City of Oxnard I 2020 -2030 Key staff: Terri Avila, Alan Sako, Michael Burns, Maile Tanaka Project Description: ESA provided comprehensive environmental planning services to the City of Oxnard under an on-call contract, preparing multiple IS/MNDs and related CEQA documentation for a range of public and private development projects. ESA's work included preparation of IS/MNDs for electronic billboard projects and an ordinance amendment adjacent to U.S. Highway 101, addressing key issues such as aesthetics, light and glare, and construction impacts, as well as more complex development projects including the Arturus Cold Storage facility and the Lockwood Ill Apartments. For these projects, ESA conducted peer reviews of technical studies, prepared air quality and greenhouse gas analyses, completed biological and cultural resources investigations, and managed the CEQA process from initial study through document completion. Based on this successful performance, ESA's on-call contract with the City of Oxnard has been renewed for an additional four year term. Client Reference Information: Joe Pearson II, AICP, Planning and Environmental Services Manager I 805.385.8272 I joe.pearson@oxnard.org 9 On-Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 199 r ESA ~ Attachment 1 Key Staff Resumes 200 Terri Avila Project Director EDUCATION BS, Chemistry and Math with a Minor in Applied Math (Statistics) and Sociology, Hood College 40VEARS' EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATIONS/ REGISTRATION Environmental Consultation and Permitting Requirements for CEQA/NEPA Projects land Use Law Update Traffic Engineering Certificate Urban Mass Transit Certificate, Federal Highway Administration PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals American Planning Association Southern California Water Committee Society of Wetland Scientists Terri Avila has nearly 40 years of experience managing complex, high-profile, multi-disciplinary project teams. She has an extensive background in environmental compliance, with particular expertise in coastal environments. Terri's expertise is perfectly suited to analyzing the environmental impacts of projects where the combination of land use, natural resources, and transportation needs intersect, particularly in coastal environments. She has been the Strategic Advisor, Project Director, and/or Project Manager for major CEQA, restoration, and permitting projects throughout Southern California and across the state. Relevant Experience City of Huntington Beach, Waterfront Hotel Addendum, Huntington Beach, CA. Project Manager. Terri prepared a series of Addenda associated with the Waterfront Development Project between 1998 and 2010. The Waterfront Development Project was first conceptually discussed in the Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan, which was evaluated by EIR 82 2; certified in 1983 and SEIR 82 2; certified in 1988. In 1998, the project was substantially reduced in scale, which was addressed in in Addendum #1 to SEIR 82 2. Since 2001, there have been four additional addendums. This project demonstrates Terri's ability to maximize the use of analyses provided within existing environmental documents, as well as her experience with coastal development projects. City of Huntington Beach, Pacific City Mixed-Use Development EIR, Huntington Beach, CA. Project Manager. Terri served as the project manager for the Pacific City Mixed-Use Project EIR, which evaluated a 240,000-square foot mixed-use visitor-serving commercial center, a hotel of up to eight stories in height and 400 rooms (with a ballroom, spa, and a restaurant), a 516-unit residential village, and 2,000 parking spaces. This is one of nearly ten projects that Terri completed for the City of Huntington Beach, but it also represents a project that has significantly contributed to the redevelopment and revitalization of the coastal area of the city, particularly in the context of existing residential uses. Laguna Ocean Foundation's Aliso Creek Estuary Restoration Plan, Laguna Beach, CA. Project Manager. Terri collected and evaluated water quality data and conducted habitat assessment surveys over two-year period. The goal of the project, which is funded by the California Coastal Conservancy and others, was to identify a feasible plan to restore the lagoon at the mouth of Aliso Creek to a healthy estuary. The plan was developed with the assistance of a technical team (i.e., ESA) and analyses of site conditions, constraints, and opportunities and potential future conditions. The product was a CEQA/NEPA-ready plan. Environmental Science Associates esassoc,com 201 Brian Allee Project Manager EDUCATION BS, City and Regional Planning, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 21 YEARS' EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Orange County Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), Co Vice President of Programs (2012- 2015), Interim President (2014), Co Special Events Coordinator(2016- 2018), Chapter Director (2019-2024), 2024 State AEP Conference Chair Orange County American Planning Association (APA), Member Brian Allee is an environmental planner and project manager with 20 years of experience in project entitlements and preparing environmental documentation compliant with CEQA and NEPA. He is skilled in tracking and ensuring project compliance with conditions of approval and local, state, and federal agency coordination. He is experienced in research, analysis, and preparation of all levels of CEQA and NEPA documentation for a wide variety of project types, including sports arenas, mixed-use/urban infill projects, large scale residential and specific plan developments, industrial and commercial developments, parks, medical facilities, waste management, water and wastewater infrastructure, and coastal development projects. Relevant Experience City of Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach Air Show EIR, Huntington Beach, CA. Project Manager. ESA prepared the EIR and associated Biological Resources and Aviation Noise technical reports to evaluate the Pacific Airshow, a spectacle-scale airshow in the City of Huntington Beach. The project would include an event program for the continuation of the Airshow for up to 10 additional years. Brian served as the main point of contract for the City and is responsible for the day-to-day management of all Project tasks. Brian also led, prepared, and oversaw the work of the in-house technical team members and subconsultants. City of Huntington Beach, Symphony of the Flowers EIR Addendum, Huntington Beach, CA. Project Manager. ESA prepared an EIR Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007). As project manager, Brian led the preparation of the EIR Addendum. City of Huntington Beach, Center Avenue Skate Park EIR, City of Huntington Beach, CA. Environmental Specialist. ESA prepared the EIR for the Center Avenue Skate Park in Huntington Beach. Given the adjacent residential uses, traffic and noise issues were key environmental concerns. In response to concerns from neighbors, the EIR fully disclosed the potential for impacts during daily and special events. It also assessed potential impacts on a variety of other issues. Brian assisted with the section preparation of the EIR. California Environmental Protection Agency/DTSC/Project Navigator, Ascon Landfill Remedial Action Plan EIR, City of Huntington Beach, CA. Environmental Specialist. As a former hazardous landfill site, this was a highly controversial remediation regarding the 38-acre ASCON project. The project engaged ESA to analyze the impacts of the proposed remedial activities. Brian assisted with the MND to address Interim Removal Measures and the EIR for the Remedial Action Plan. Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 202 Alan Sako, LEED AP BD+C Principal Consultant, Air Quality, Climate, and Acoustics EDUCATION BS, Atmospheric, Oceanic& Environmental Science, University of California, Los Angeles 24VEARS 1 EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATIONS/ REGISTRATION U.S. Green Building Council, LEED Accredited Professional (BD+C), 2014 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Air&Waste Management Association U.S. Green Building Council, Los Angeles Chapter, LEED AP BD+C Alan brings over 24 years of specialized experience in leading and delivering air quality and climate change analyses for CEQA and NEPA environmental documents. His work includes detailed ambient air quality impact evaluations, health risk assessments {HRAs), and regulatory compliance support across a wide range of projects. Alan is highly proficient in using air pollutant dispersion and emissions modeling tools and has extensive experience conducting Conformity assessments under the Clean Air Act. He has also evaluated the energy efficiency and renewable energy implications of proposed projects, integrating these findings into CEQA impact assessments. In addition to his core air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) expertise, Alan has a strong background in acoustical/noise and vibration modeling, as well as the preparation of Risk Management Plans (RMPs) and Offsite Consequence Analyses (OCAs) for facilities involving hazardous materials. Known for his collaborative approach, Alan has a proven ability to guide complex, multi-stakeholder environmental reviews and develop practical, technically sound solutions to air quality, energy, GHG, noise, and hazardous materials challenges. Relevant Experience Huntington Memorial Hospital Master Development Plan Amendment. Technical Lead. Alan served as the technical lead and task manager for the air quality and GHG analyses for the Master Development Plan Amendment, which refines the existing 20-year planning framework for the Hospital and allows for future development, modernization, and renovation of the Hospital campus. The project proposes a reconfiguration of the Master Plan boundaries, additions to existing buildings including a major new inpatient wing, totaling approximately 215,000 square feet, demolition of existing buildings totaling approximately 240,000 square feet, and various renovations and upgrades, to be carried out in phases over the next 20 years. Key environmental issues include traffic and circulation, aesthetics, air quality, noise, and GHGs. ASCON Landfill Site CEQA Project, Huntington Beach, CA. Senior Technical Lead. Alan served as a technical lead for air quality, GHGs, and hazardous material assessments for the ASCON Landfill Site CEQA Project EIR to address the Remedial Action Plan for the 38-acre ASCON former hazardous landfill site in Huntington Beach, California. The project involved a suite of Responsible Parties, the DTSC, and PCR to analyze the impacts of the proposed remedial activities. Thousands of data points were considered in the analysis. Alan provided key support for the comprehensive Health Risk Assessment (HRA) and AQIA quantifying the incremental increase in risk for carcinogenic and non carcinogenic health impacts off-site from predicted exposure to Contaminants of Potential Concern {COPCs) (metals, volatile, and semi-volatile compounds) and DPM from exhaust. The HRA evaluated two clean-up options, which became key decision points in selection of the Preferred Remedy. Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 203 Maile Tanaka Principal Biologist EDUCATION MS, Environmental Science & Management, UC Santa Barbara BS, Organismic Biology, Ecology & Evolution, UC Los Angeles 20 YEARS' EXPERIENCE SPECIALIZED TRAINING Rattlesnake Handling and Relocation Training, 2020 Introduction to Plant Identification & Ecology, UCR Extension, 2018 Snowy Plover Survey Training, Sea & Sage Audubon Society, 2015 Helicopter Flight/Safety Training, Burns & McDonnell, 2015 Desert Tortoise Council Annual Symposium, 2014 Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Survey Training Workshop, Southern Sierra Research Station, 2013 Maile Tanaka has 20 years of experience in the field of consulting biology. She is a skilled project manager possessing the technical expertise, on-the ground field experience, and talent for detailed organization and effective communication necessary for a successful leader. Her professional experience includes general biological assessments, focused surveys for special-status species, jurisdictional delineations, mitigation monitoring, and construction monitoring throughout Southern California. Maile has extensive experience in preparing technical biological resources assessments and Biological Resources sections for environmental documents in accordance with CEQA guidelines, compliance reporting to satisfy permit requirements, as well as reports addressing compatibility with the Orange County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP). She has prepared permit applications and compliance documents for regulatory agencies (i.e., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [USACE], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS], California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW], and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]). Relevant Experience Orange County Public Works, Talbert Marsh Living Shoreline, Huntington Beach, CA. Project Manager. This habitat enhancement and erosion protection project consisted of replacing an existing failing rip-rap slope with new rip-rap and the installation of a living shoreline of native intertidal marsh plants along the northeastern bank of Talbert Marsh. Maile coordinated with subconsultants GeoEngineers and Merkel and Associates, Inc. to conduct marine eelgrass and Cau[erpa pre-construction surveys and coordinated with biologists to conduct pre-construction special-status plant and nesting bird surveys and biological monitoring for implementation of a rip rap replacement and living shoreline restoration project. The project was successfully completed in December of 2024. Orange County Public Works, Santiago Creek Tree Survey. Orange County, CA. Project Manager. Maile coordinated with ESA arborists to conduct a tree inventory for an approximately 1-mile reach of Santiago Creek between the Santa Ana River and Interstate 5. The scope of services included a preliminary meeting with the OC Survey team, who conducted a drone aerial survey to map the trees, as well as a tree inventory conducted by ESA arborists to map existing trees within the survey area. The arborists assessed each accessible tree specimen from its base and recorded pertinent data, including the species and physical characteristics, such as height, trunk diameter, canopy spread in eight directions health, vigor, balance, and aesthetic condition. ESA presented tree data and results of the inventory in a concise report. Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 204 Kyle Garcia, MA, RPA Principal Archaeologist EDUCATION MA, Anthropology (Archaeology Option), California State University Los Angeles BA, Anthropology, (Physical/ Biological Emphasis), University of California, Santa Barbara 20VEARS' EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATIONS/ REGISTRATION Registered Professional Archaeologist, #4587 Secretary of Interior Qualified Archaeologist Riverside County Registered Archaeologist #202 and Paleontologist Orange County Certified Archaeologist Orange County Certified Paleontologist 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training-Update, 2020 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for American Archaeology Society for California Archaeology Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Kyle Garcia has over 20 years of experience in the archaeology and prehistory of southern California, with a specialization in fauna! analysis. During his career, he has authored or contributed to more than 800 projects subject to the requirements of CEQA, NEPA, and regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. He is well-versed in the archaeological resources of California's coastal, interior, and island settings. He is skilled in evaluation historic and prehistoric archaeological resources; agency and Native American consultation; pedestrian surveys, testing and evaluation excavations as well as archaeological and paleontological construction monitoring, and laboratory processing. During his tenure, he has authored or contributed to more than 400 technical reports and sections to support all levels of CEQA and NEPA documents. Kyle's portfolio of projects includes energy, water, and transportation infrastructure as well as residential, commercial, mixed-use, institutional, and urban redevelopment serving public and private sector clients. Kyle has conducted archaeological work throughout California and is a certified archaeologist and paleontologist in Riverside and Orange counties. Relevant Experience Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Final Expansion Project, Orange County, CA. Cultural/Archaeologica/ and Paleontological Task Lead and Manager. Under contract to Orange County Water District (OCWD), Kyle managed archaeological and paleontological construction monitoring services during construction of the OCWD's GWRS Final Expansion Project and Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD} Headworks Modification Project (P2-122) located on Plant 1 and 2 in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, California. ESA also provided pre-construction Worker's Environmental Awareness Trainings to OCWD and OC SAN staff and their contractors. ESA worked alongside tribal monitors from the Kizh Nation - Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians for the duration of the project. SCE Point Conception Power Pole Replacement Project, Santa Barbara County, CA. Project Manager. ESA was retained by Southern California Edison Company to conduct archaeological construction monitoring services of their Point Conception Power Pole Replacement project in Santa Barbara County, California. The Project entailed the replacement of22 deteriorated power poles. Kyle managed and conducted archaeological monitoring services of all ground-disturbing activities. The monitoring services were used to identify and evaluate archeological resources encountered pursuant to compliance with the CEQA and the County's General Guidelines. No archaeological resources were encountered during the monitoring services. Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 205 r-ESA Michael Burns, CHG. CEG, PG, QSD Principal Geologist EDUCATION BS, Geology, San Jose State University, 1980 30+ YEARS' EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATIONS/ REGISTRATION Certified Hydrogeologist (CHG), No.280, CA, 1995 Certified Engineering Geologist (CEG), No.1846, CA, 1993 Professional Geologist {PG), No.4532, CA, 1989 Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) #PG4532 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Bay Planning Coalition, Dredging and Beneficial Reuse Committee Michael Burns is a highly skilled and effective project manager and technical analyst with more than 30 years of experience in the environmental and geological sciences. He provides expert services in CEQA and NEPA planning and permitting, site characterization, water quality investigations, remedial investigation/feasibility studies {RI/FS), waste management, litigation support, property assessments, development and redevelopment, soil and groundwater remediation, and groundwater banking. His projects include municipal and regional water supply, industrial and manufacturing facilities, general plan updates, airports, levees, landfills, refineries, research and development facilities, hazardous waste management, vineyards, and commercial properties. Relevant Experience Syphon Reservoir Improvement Project, Orange County, CA. Hydrogeologist and Hazardous Materials Analyst. Michael provided senior level technical consultation and analysis for geology, seismicity, groundwater hydrology and water quality, and hazardous materials. The project will increase the capacity and replace the existing engineered dam with a new and larger engineered dam. It will allow the storage of additional recycled water produced at the Michelson WRP during periods of low demand for use during periods of high demand. Key issues included the location in a seismically active region, the increased size of the dam and reservoir area, and the increase in the downstream flooding area in the event of a dam failure. Culver Crossings, Environmental Impact Report, Culver City and City of Los Angeles, CA. Geology, Hazardous Materials, and Hydrogeology Analyst. Michael analyzed geology, seismicity, hazardous materials, hydrology, and water quality impacts. This redevelopment project constructed office buildings and underground parking on property that straddles the Cities of Los Angeles and Culver City. Key issues included evaluating residual soil and groundwater contamination from previous onsite and offsite uses and developing mitigation to address the residual contamination and evaluating the proposed design features to manage stormwater runoff and ensure that stormwater is captured and treated to prevent impacts to offsite waterways and the capacity of the municipal stormwater system. Los Cerritos Wetlands Restoration and Oil Well Consolidation Project, Long Beach, CA. Hazardous Materials, Geologic Resources, and Utilities Analyst. Michael provided input for the project description, peer review of technical reports, analysis for hazards and hazardous materials, geologic, seismic, and utilities resources for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. Key issues include the destruction and relocation of oil and natural gas wells such that the former production field can successfully function as wetland habitat. Environmental Science Associates esassoc,com 206 r l~SA ~ Attachment 2 Organizational Chart 207 AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GASES, ENERGY AND NOISE Alan Sako, LEED AP BD•C Elbert Hsiung Abdul Khan Tim Witwer BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Maile Tanaka Amanda French Jaclyn Catino-Davenport Douglas Gordon-Blackwood Brandon Mukogawa • Subconsultant Bold Text g Technical Leads Project Director Terri Avila Project Manager Brian Allee KEY illEGHNIGALl SUPPORT COASTAL RESOURCS/ ENGINEERING AND SEA LEVEL RISE Nick Garrity, PE Shannon Fiala CULTURAL RESOURCES/ PALEONTOLOGY Kyle Garcia, RPA Fatima Clark James Clark Russell Shapiro Deputy Project Manager Annie Cadiz GEOLOGY, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, STORMWATER, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Michael Burns, CHG, CEG, PG, QSD Justin Ngyuen GIS Jason Nielsen Chance Scott HISTORICAL RESOURCES Alison Garcia Keller TRANSPORTATION Steven J. Brown· 208 EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULT ANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billing 1. All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen (15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who performed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSUL TANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULT ANT is making satisfactoty progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULT ANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULT ANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 209 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 210 EXHIBIT B SECTIOl'\I E Fee Schedule Our proposed fees are provided on a time-and-materials basis using our 2026 standard hourly rates, with a standard annual escalation of 4 percent. Personnel Category Rates Charges will be made at the Category hourly rates set forth below for time spent on project management, consultation or meetings related to the project, field work, report preparation and review, travel time, etc. Time spent on projects in litigation, in depositions and providing expert testimony will be charged at the Category rate times 1.5. ESA 2026 Hourly Rates by Staff Member Terri Avila Brian Allee Annie Cadiz Kyle Garcia, RPA (Cultural Resources/Paleontology) Alan Sako, LEED AP BD+C (Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases, Energy and Noise) Nick Garrity, PE (Coastal_~esources/Eng_ineering and Sea Level Rise) Michael Burns, CHG, CEG, PG, QSD (Geology, Hazardous Materials, Stormwater, _ Hyd_rology a_nd Water Quality) __ Maile Tanaka (Biological Resources) Fatima Clark (Cultural Resources/Paleontology) J_ames Clark (Cultural Resources/Paleontology) Russell Shapiro (Paleontology) Elbert Hsiung (Air Quality, Green~<?use Gases, Energy and Noise) Abdul Khan (Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases, Energy and Noise) Tim Witwer (Noise) Amanda French (Biological Resources) Ja~lyn Catino-Davenport (Biolog!cc_'I Resourt::es} _ Douglas Gordon-Blackwood (Biological Resources) Brandon Mukogawa (Biological Resources) Shannon Fiala (Coastal Resources) Justin Nguyen (Geology, Hazardous Materials, Stormwater, Hydrology and Water Quality) Alison Garcia Keller (Historical Resources) Jason Nielsen (GIS) Chance Scott (GIS) Senior Principal Consultant 4 $347 Managing Consultant4 $277 Senior Consultant 4 $234 Principal Consultant 3 $282 __ Principal Consultant 3 $282 Principal Consultant 3 $282 Principal Consultant 3 $282 -------------- Managing Consultant 3 $253 Managing Consultant 3 $253 __ Principal __ Co_r,sul~ant 3 $282 Senior Consultant 6 $279 Senior Consultant 4 $234 Associate Consultant 3 $184 Senior Consultant 4 $234 senior Consultant 2 $189 _ !'Jlana_g!r,g Consultant 3 $253 Managing Consultai:-it 3 $253 Consultant 4 $160 Managing Consultant 4 $277 Consultant 6 $188 Managing Consultant 3 $253 Principal Consultant 2 $253 Associate Consultant 2 $170 ESA 2026 Hourly Rates by Labor Category 1 On•Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 211 Principal Consultant $222 $253 $282 $311 $341 $370 Managing Consultant $205 $228 $253 $277 $301 $324 Senior Consultant $171 $189 $212 $234 $257 $279 Associate Consultant $154 $170 $184 $198 $213 $228 Consultant $116 $130 $144 $160 $173 $188 Project Technician $86 $109 $131 $150 $170 $194 (a) The range of rates shown for each staff category reflects ESA staff qualifications, expertise and experience levels. These rate ranges allow our project managers to assemble the best project teams to meet the unique project requirements and client expectations for each opportunity. (b) From time to time, ESA retains outside professional and technical labor on a temporary basis to meet peak workload demands. Such contract labor may be charged at regular Employee Category rates. (c) ESA reserves the right to revise the Personnel Category Rates periodically to reflect changes in its operating costs. ESA Expenses ~ TravelExpenses 1. Transportation a. Company vehicle -fixed rate+ fee for mileage in excess of 100 miles. b. Common carrier or car rental -actual expense multiplied by 1.15 c. If company vehicle is to be used in off-road conditions, a daily $15 use fee will be added to the standard daily vehicle rate. 2. Lodging, meals and related travel expenses-direct expenses multiplied by 1.15 B. Technology and Data Management Fee 2 Starting January 2023, ESA implemented a 3% Technology and Data Management fee on all applicable contracts, excluding charges related to equipment rentals, reimbursable expenses, and subcontractor fees. This fee plays a pivotal role in mitigating an array of technology and data management expenditures incurred by ESA to ensure the delivery of the comprehensive and high-quality services our clients expect. These expenses include, but are not limited to: • Long-Term Data Retention and Security Administration: Covering the expenses associated with administering the protection of client data and assets throughout and beyond the contractual period. • Development and Maintenance of Internal ESA Software Tools: Accounting for the ongoing investments required to create and maintain tools integral to our client engagements. • Data Privacy and Security Maintenance: Encompassing the costs involved in maintaining data privacy and security, including regular security audits to uphold the highest standards. On-Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 212 4 ITEM RATE/DAY RATE/WEEK RATE/MONTH Field Traps Digital Hypsometer (Nikon) Backpack Sprayer 360-Degree 4k Camera High Resolution Time-Lapse Camera Beach Seine Block Net PIT Tagging Kit Underwater Light Meter Otter Trawl Wildlife Acoustics Bat Detector Wildlife Trail Camera Fiber Optic Endoscope Spotting Scope Sand Transport Station Wind Monitoring Station Personal Protective Eauinment IPPE\ • 110 , I ft:lt • 11 I I I Mirrorless Camera + Lens + SD Card Tripod + Camera Case Lighting Equipment Shotgun Microphone Kit 2 Person Micronhone Kit I I It , I ~ , Total Station UAV/Drone RTK-GPS : I I RTK-GPS Smartnet Subscription Hypack Survey Software Laser/Auto Level Single-Beam Echoshounder Sidescan Sonar Sound Velocity Profiler 1m GNSS Data Collection System Sub-meter GNSS Data Collection System Sub-foot Data Collection System Garmin GPS or enuivalent I I I I p , , I : f . . ' ISCO 2150 Area Velocity Flow Logger SonTek IQ-Plus Area Velocity Flow Logger Logging Rain Gage Hand-Held Current Meter Surface Velocity Radar Wave Pressure Sensor Wave Buoy Sonic Wave Sensor Logging Water Level -Pressure Transducer Logging Barometric Pressure Logger Well Probe / Water Level Meter Bottom-Mounted Tripod / Mooring Stormwater Crest Sampler ADCP Riverboard Radar Wave Sensor with Lo er Box , : fl : I Logging Turbidimeter/Water Level Recorder Logging Conductivity/Water Level Recorder Remote Monitoring Logger Box Recording Conductivity Meter w/Datalogger Hand-Held Turbidimeter Hand-Held Salinity Meter or pH meter Logging Salinity Gauge On-Call Environmental Services RFQI# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 $ 50 25 30 35 20 60 30 25 115 125 30 150 50 25 220 50 20 15 10 300 300 300 80 150 50 175 200 75 90 120 245 45 ' 50 100 10 50 50 35 25 30 700 150 $ 20 50 35 ' ' 175 100 500 400 100 750 200 550 175 75 50 25 1,500 600 425 $ 300 500 50 115 175 175 150 300 $ 75 60 200 350 460 1540 2000 500 250 180 85 1,700 $ 800 1,500 200 460 700 500 125 60 400 20 1000 $ 400 250 250 200 150 Environmental Science Associates esassoc.com 213 ITEM RATE/DAY RA TE/WEEK RA TE/MONTH Logging DO/Temp Probe Logging Water Quality Sande 1 Sensor Logging Water Quality Sande 2 Sensor Logging Water Quality Sande 3 Sensor Logging Water Quality Sande 4 Sensor Telemetry System Hardware Water Quality Multi-Probe Depth Profiler Niskin Water Sampler ISCO 6712 Portable Samplerw/lSCO 2105 Module ·t ' • ,, ' I I : Peat Corer 60Ib Helly-Smith Bedload Sampler Mini-Ponar Grab Sampler DH-76 Suspended Sediment Sampler D-96 Suspended Sediment Sampler Bridge Crane RSET AMS Soil Sampling Kit Hand-Held Helley-Smith Bedload Sampler Guelph Permeameter Sludge Sampler Shear Strength Vane Handheld DH-48 Susnended Sediment Samnler Small Watercraft 15'-17' Boat 18'-21' Boat 22' -25' Boat Houseboat Floatina Laboratorv 50 65 75 90 200 50 60 $ 85 200 50 100 200 150 50 50 30 60 60 60 30 $ 100 375 450 550 200 250 300 350 350 $ 400 1,500 2,000 2,250 4,500 • Actual project charges will include the daily rate plus $0,75 per beyond 100 miles Subcontracts Subcontract services will be invoiced at cost multiplied by 1.15, Other 150 700 800 900 1,000 125 900 The fees above do not include sales tax. Any applicable or potentiat' sales tax will be charged when appropriate. Payment Terms Unless otherwise agreed in writing, ESA will submit invoices on a monthly basis. Any unpaid balances shall draw interest at one and one half percent {1.5%) per month or the highest rate allowed by law, whichever is lower, commencing thirty {30) days after date of invoice. All invoices not contested in writing within fifteen {15) business days of receipt are deemed accepted by Client as true and accurate and Client thereafter waives any objection to Clients invoices, which are payable in full. 5 On-Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 Environmental Science Associates €SilSSOC.COn1 214 • Advanced Technology-Related Costs: Addressing the escalating expenses associated with subscriptions for cutting-edge technical software, licenses, and cloud data services. This fee structure enables ESA to uphold its commitment to providing clients with top-tier services while managing the ever-evolving demands of technology and data management in the work that we do. C. Cloud-based Services Nearmap High Resolution Images $55/imag<>_ t------,---~---j ArcGIS Online Hosting (Web Maps/Apps) $225 ~------j------e---------j--------t--~-----j Website Hosting $200 Custom Application & Services Hosting* $300* Modeling (GeoHECRAS, TUFLOW, Delft3D) + Drone Processing Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) Processing $7 $13 $160 $950 $3,900 $190 $1,120 $4,600 *includes support for database, SSL, IT support -costs vary by project. Contact software development services for firm pricing. D. Printing/Reproduction Rates E. 3 If a weekly or monthly rate is not provided, equipment usage is billed at a daily rate. ITEM Black & White -8.5 x 11 Black & White -11 x 17 Color -8.5 x 11 Color-11 x 17 B&W -Plotter (Toner -ECO Quality) B&W -Plotter (Toner-Presentation Quality) Color-Plotter (Inkjet -ECO Quality) Color-Plotter (Inkjet -Presentation Quality) CD Digital Photography All Other Items (including bindings and covers) Vehicles -Standard size (no off-road usage) Vehicles -4x4 /Truck (light duty) Vehicles -4x4 /Truck (heavy duly) Vehicles - A TV Noise Meter Hydroacoustic Noise Monitoring Equipment Satellite Phone Electrofisher On-Call Environmental Services RFQ# 2026-0115 / February 12, 2026 RATE/PAGE $0.15 $0.30 $0.50 $0.80 $0.50/sf $1.25/sf $2,50/sf $5.00/sf $10.00 $20.00 (up to 50 images) At cost plus 10% $ 115a 175a 200a 175 115 175 15 350 $ 550a 70 1,750 SAMPLE PRICING 24x36 B/W CAD drawing would cost $3 per sheet 24x36 B/W CAD drawing would cost $7.50 per sheet 24x36 Color Drawing would cost $15 per sheet 24x36 Color Drawing would cost $30 per sheet 250 Environmental Science Associates esassoc,com 215 __......, ENVISCl-06 MC , .. , .... ACORD" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MINDDNYYYI ~ 3/24/2026 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed, If SUBROGATION IS WAIVE0 1 subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement, A statement on this certificate does not confer rlallts to the certificate holder In lleu of such endorsementlsi, PRooucen License# OE67760 ~cr All Smith IOA Insurance Servlcee :!J0°~ , u,•, (1619) 788-5796 50206 I r.e~ .•. ,,(619) 574,0200 3638 Nobel Drive , 0 , k , Suite 410 il'Jllhs-AII.Smlth1wloausa,com San Diego, CA 92122 •NSURER'S' AFFORDING COVERAGE ...... 1,rnunERA:RLI Insurance Comnanv 13066 INSURED INSURER e :SlrlusPolnt Sneclaltv Insurance Cornoratlon 16820 Environmental Sclonco Associates INSURER Cl 676 Market street, Suite 3700 ltlSURERD: San Francisco, CA 94106 INSURER El INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER• REVISION NUMBER• THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTVv1THSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECTTO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IIN.§B TYPE OF INSURANCE ~.l?P_L 1~H~!1 POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 -==i ClAIMS•l,1ADE [K] OCCUR X X PSB0007416 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 DAMAGE TO RENTED $ 1,000,000 f Limited Cont Llab MED EXP 1AM one 00($00) $ 10,000 Serv Interest PEn""' AL& Ao•••••""'" ' 2,000,000 - ;:iGEN.·l AGGRrnATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GEN£0 AL AGGREO" TE ' 4,000,000 POLICY X r~ □ LOC PRODUCTS -CO/.IPJOPAGG ' 4,000,000 o•tt••· XCU/BFPD/Cont Llab Ded ' 0 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY -. COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO X X PSA0002468 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 BODILY INJURY /Per n~•soo\ $ - 2~0NLY -ifi't6RULED --BODILY INJURY (Per accldenl $ ~"!Ml's~,v x &"8~~~'1/E~ rte?r~NAMAGE $ x po 1,000 I 1,000 $ A .K UMBRELLA LIAB !~OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE ' 10,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS·IMDE PSE0004660 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 AGGREGATE ' 10,000,000 OED I X I RETENTION$ 0 ' A ~w~~~~f8.fe"lfs~~~\1?~ XI esit.--I 19IH· VIN X PSW0004136 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 E.l. EACH A'''"'lOENT ' 1,000,000 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE [ill ll,IFl~EW,•'\'•'~\11 EXCLUDED? NIA 1,000,000 anaor;n l E.L. DISEASE. EA El.IPL tWEE I S gi~i~tt*~fJPERATIONS be!O'N EL. DISEASE· POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 B IProfOSSlonal Llab. CPPLD000281900 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 Per Claim 10,000,000 B Ded.: $60k Per Chn CPPLD000281900 12/1/2026 12/1/2026 Aggregate 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS/ VEHICLES JACORD 101, AddH!onal Remarks Schaduh>, may bo atlached If more apace 11 requl1ed) Re: City of Huntington Beach Resolution 2008· 3 City of Huntington Beach Us officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers are :)g!ff..\?~'l!l!l~ ,.ttllVO~o al and Auto Llablllty per the attached endorsements as required by written contract. Insurance Is Primary and Non• t , ory. a ver of Suhr n s to General Llablllty, Auto Llablllty and Workers' Compensation. Stop-Oap coverage Is Included ror the State of Washington. B~: 30 Days Notice of Cancellallon with 10 Days Notice ror Non-Payment of Premium In accordance with the poll<mft'R~~SJ, VIGLIOTTA CITY ATTORNEY CERTIFICATE HOLDER CAN CELL• Tin>' r.lTY OF HUNrlNGTON BEAvn SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE City of Huntington Beach I. A,~ ~{.@. 2000 Main Street t:1---1. ,_,. n'l.CAO ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 216 Policy Number: PSB0007 416 RU Insurance Company Named Insured: Environmental Science Associates THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. RLIPack® FOR PROFESSIONALS BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS COVERAGE FORM -SECTION II -LIABILITY 1. C. WHO IS AN INSURED is amended to include as an additional insured any person or organization that you agree in a contract or agreement requiring insurance to include as an additional insured on this policy, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused in whole or in part by you or those acting on your behalf: a. In the performance of your ongoing operations; b. In connection with premises owned by or rented to you; or c. In connection with "your work" and included within the "product-completed operations hazard". additional insured under this policy must apply on a primary basis, or a primary and non-contributory basis, this insurance is primary to other insurance that is available to such additional insured which covers such additional insured as a named insured, and we will not share with that other insurance, provided that: a. The "bodily injury" or "property damage" for which coverage is sought occurs after you have entered into that contract or agreement; or b. The "personal and advertising injury" for which coverage is sought arises out of an offense committed after you have entered into that contract or agreement. 2. The insurance provided to the additional insured by this endorsement is limited as follows: 4. The following is added to SECTION Ill K. 2. a. This insurance does not apply on any basis to any person or organization for which coverage as an additional insured specifically is added by another endorsement to this policy. b. This insurance does not apply to the rendering of or failure to render any "professional services11 • c. This endorsement does not increase any of the limits of insurance stated in D. Liability And Medical Expenses Limits of Insurance. 3. The following is added to SECTION UI H.2. Other Insurance -COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS (BUT APPLICABLE ONLY TO SECTION II - LIABILITY) However, if you specifically agree in a contract or agreement that the insurance provided to an Transfer of Rights of Recovery Against Others to Us -COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS (BUT APPLICABLE TO ONLY TO SECTION II - LIABILITY) We waive any rights of recovery we may have against any person or organization because of payments we make for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of "your work" performed by you, or on your behalf, under a contract or agreement with that person or organization. We waive these rights only where you have agreed to do so as part of a contract or agreement with such person or organization entered into by you before the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs, or the "personal and advertising injury" offense is committed. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS POLICY REMAIN UNCHANGED. PPB 304 02 12 Page 1 of 1 217 Policy Number: Environmental Science Associates PSA0002468 RU Insurance Company Named Insured: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. RLIPack® BUSINESS AUTO ENHANCEMENT SCHEDULE OF COVERAGES ADDRESSED BY THIS ENDORSEMENT A. Broad Form Named Insured B. Employees As Insureds C. Blanket Additional Insured D. Blanket Waiver Of Subrogation E. Employee Hired Autos F. Fellow Employee Coverage G. Auto Loan Lease Gap Coverage H. Glass Repair -Waiver Of Deductible I. Personal Effects Coverage J, Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage K. Hired Auto Physical Damage -Loss Of Use L. Hired Car-Worldwide Coverage M. Temporary Transportation Expenses N. Amended Bodily Injury Definition -Mental Anguish O. Airbag Coverage P. Amended Insured Contract Definition -Railroad Easement Q. Coverage Extensions -Audio, Visual And Data Electronic Equipment Not Designed Solely For The Production Of Sound R. Notice Of And Knowledge Of Occurrence S. Unintentional Errors Or Omissions. T. Towing Coverage PPA 300 03 13 Page 1 of 5 218 This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM A. Broad Form Named Insured The following is added to the SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, Para graph A.1. Who Is An Insured Provision: Any business entity newly acquired or formed by you during the policy period, provided you own fifty percent (50%) or more of the business entity and the business entity is not separately insured for Bus-iness Auto Coverage. Coverage is extended up to a maximum of one hundred eighty (180) days following the acquisition or formation of the business entity. This provision does not apply to any person or organization for which coverage is excluded by endorsement. B. Employees As Insureds The following is added to the SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, Para graph A.1. Who Is An Insured Provision: Any "employee" of yours is an "insured" while using a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow in your business or your personal affairs. C. Blanket Additional Insured The following is added to the SECTION II - COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, Para graph A.1. Who Is An Insured Provision: Any person or organization that you are required to include as an additional insured on this coverage form in a contract or agreement that is executed by you before the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs is an "insured" for liability coverage, but only for damages to which this insurance applies and only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the Who Is An Insured provision contained in SECTION II -COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE. The insurance provided to the additional insured will be on a primary and non-contributory basis to the additional insured's own business auto coverage if you are required to do so in a contract or agreement that is executed by you before the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs. D. Blanket Waiver Of Subrogation The following is added to the SECTION IV -BUSI NESS AUTO CONDITIONS, A. Loss Conditions, 5. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us: We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization to the extent required of you by a contract executed prior to any "accident" or "loss", provided that the "accident" or "loss" arises out PPA 300 03 13 of the operations contemplated by such contract. The waiver applies only to the person or organization designated in such contract. E. Employee Hired Autos 1. The following is added to the SECTION 11 - COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, Paragraph A.1. Who Is An Insured Provision: An "employee" of yours is an "insured" while operating an "auto" hired or rented under a contract or agreement in that "employee's" name, with your permission, while performing duties related to the conduct of your business. 2. Changes In General Conditions: Paragraph 5.b. of the Other Insurance Con dition in the BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS is deleted and replaced with the following: b. For Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage, the following are deemed to be covered "autos" you own: (1) Any covered "auto" you lease, hire, rent or borrow; and (2) Any covered "auto" hired or rented by your "employee" under a contract in that individual "employee's" name, with your permission, while performing duties related to the conduct of your business. However, any "auto" that is leased, hired, rented or borrowed with a driver is not a covered "auto". F. Fellow Employee Coverage SECTION II -COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, Exclusion 8.5. does not apply if you have workers compensation insurance in-force covering all of your employees. G. Auto Loan Lease Gap Coverage SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, C. Limit Of Insurance, is amended by the addition of the following: In the event of a total "loss" to a covered "auto" shown in the Schedule of Declarations, we will pay any unpaid amount due on the lease or loan for a covered "auto", less: 1. The amount paid under the PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE section of the policy; and 2. Any: a. Overdue lease/loan payments at the time of the "loss"; Page 2 of 5 219 b, Financial penalties imposed under a lease for excessive use, abnormal wear and tear or high mileage, c. Security deposits not returned by the lessor; d. Costs for extended warranties, Credit Life Insurance, Health, Accident or Disability Insurance purchased with the loan or lease; and e. Carry-over balances from previous loans or leases. H. Glass Repair -Waiver Of Deductible SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, D. Deductible is amended by adding the following: No deductible for a covered "auto" will apply to glass damage if the glass is repaired rather than replaced. I. Personal Effects Coverage The following is added to SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, A. Coverage, 4. Coverage Extensions: c. Personal Effects Coverage In the event of a total theft loss of your covered "auto" we will pay up to $400 for "loss" to wearing apparel and other personal effects which are: (1) Owned by an "insured"; and (2) In or on your covered "auto"; No deductible applies to Personal Effects Coverage. J. Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage The following is added to SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, A. Coverage, 4. Coverage Extensions: d. Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage If hired "autos" are covered "autos" for Liability Coverage and this policy also provides Physical Damage Coverage for an owned "auto", then the Physical Damage Coverage is extended to "autos" that you hire, rent or borrow subject to the following: (1) The most we will pay for "loss" in any one "accident" to a hired, rented or borrowed "auto" is the lesser of: (a) $60,000 (b) The actual cash value of the damaged or stolen property as of the time of the 11 loss 11 ; or (c) The cost of repairing or replacing the damaged or stolen property with other property of like kind and quality. PPA 300 03 13 (2) An adjustment for depreciation and physical condition will be made in the event of a total "loss11 • (3) If a repair or replacement results in better than like kind or quality, we will not pay for the betterment. (4) A deductible equal to the highest Physical Damage deductible applicable to any owned auto will apply. (5) This Coverage Extension will not apply to: (a) Any "auto" that is hired, rented or borrowed with a driver; or (b) Any "auto" that is hired, rented or borrowed from your "employee". K. Hired Auto Physical Damage-Loss Of Use The following is added to SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, A. Coverage, 4. Coverage Extensions: e. We will pay sums which you legally must pay to the lessor of a covered "auto" which you have leased without a driver for thirty (30) days or less for the lessor's loss of use of the covered "auto", provided: (1) This insurance provides comprehensive, specified causes of loss or collision covered on the covered "auto"; (2) The loss of use results from the covered "auto" being damaged in an "accident" while you are leasing it. We will pay up to a maximum limit of $1,500 for this covered extension. L. Hired Car-Worldwide Coverage The following is added to SECTION II -COVERED AUTOS LIABILITY COVERAGE, A.2. Coverage Extensions: f. Hired Car -Worldwide Coverage (1) We will pay all sums an "insured" legally must pay as damages because of "bodily injury" or "property damage" to which this insurance applies, caused by an "accident" which occurs outside of the United States of America, the territories and possessions of the United States of America, Puerto Rico and Canada resulting from the maintenance, or use of any covered "auto" of the private passenger type you lease, hire, rent or borrow without a driver for thirty (30) days or less. (2) With respect to any claim made or "suit" instituted outside the United States of America, the territories and possessions of the United States of America, Puerto Rico, and Canada: Page 3 of 5 220 (a) You shall undertake the investigation, settlement and defense of such claims and "suits" and keep us advised of all proceedings and actions. (b) You will not make any settlement without our consent. (c) We will reimburse you: (i) For the amount of damages be cause of liability imposed upon you by law on account of "bodily injury" or "property damage" to which this insurance applies, and (ii) For all reasonable expenses incurred with our consent in connection with the investigation, settlement or defense of such claims or "suits". Reimbursement for expenses will be part of the Limit of Insurance for liability coverage shown in the Business Auto Coverage Declarations, and not in addition to such limits. (3) The limit of Insurance for Liability Coverage shown in the Business Auto Coverage Declarations is the most we will reimburse you for the sum of all damages imposed on you, as set forth in paragraph 2.c. above, and all expenses incurred by you arising out of any single "accident" or "loss". (4) You must maintain the greater of the follow ing primary auto liability insurance limits: (a) Compulsory admitted insurance with limits required to be in force to satisfy the legal requirements of the jurisdiction where the accident occurs; or (b) Insurance limits required by law and issued by a government entity or by an insurer licensed or permitted by law to do business in the jurisdiction where the "accident" occurs; or (c) Auto liability insurance limits of at least $300,000 combined single limit or $100,000 per person/$300,000 per acci dent Bodily Injury, $100,000 Property Damage. If you fail to comply with the above, this insurance is not invalidated. However, in the event of a "loss", we will pay only to the extent that we would have been liable had you so complied. (5) The insurance provided by this coverage extension is excess over any other collec tible insurance available to you whether on a primary, excess contingent or any other basis. PPA 300 03 13 M. Temporary Transportation Expenses SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, A.4. Coverage Extensions, subparagraph a. Transportation Expenses is deleted and replaced by the following: a. Transportation Expenses (1) We will pay up to a maximum of $1,500 for temporary transportation expense incurred by you because of Physical Damage to a covered "auto". (2) We will pay only for those covered "autos" for which you carry Comprehensive, Colli-sion or Specified Case of Loss Coverage. (3) We will pay only for those expenses incurred by you during the period of lime that begins twenty-four (24) hours after the covered "loss" and ends at the time when the covered "auto" can be reasonable repaired or replaced. (4) This coverage does not apply while there are spare or reserve "autos" available to you for your operatjons. N. Amended Bodily Injury Definition -Mental Anguish The following is added to SECTION V - DEFINITIONS, Definition C.: "Bodily injury" also includes mental anguish, but only when the mental anguish arises from other bodily injury, sickness or disease. 0. Airbag Coverage The following is added to SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE B. Exclusions 3.a.: However, this exclusion will not apply to accidental discharge of an airbag due to mechanical or electrical breakdown. P. Amended Insured Contract Definition -Railroad Easement SECTION V -DEFINITIONS paragraph H. "Insured contact" is modified as follows: 1. Paragraph H.3. is replaced by the following: 3. Any easement or license agreement. 2. Paragraph H.6.a. is deleted. Q. Coverage Extensions -Audio, Visual And Data Electronic Equipment Not Designed Solely For The Production Of Sound SECTION 111-PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE B. Exclusions, exception paragraph a. to exclusion 4.c. and 4.d. is deleted and replaced with the following: Page 4 of 5 221 a. Equipment and accessories used with such equipment, except for tapes, records, discs or other electronic media device, provided such equipment is permanently installed in the covered "auto" at the time of the "loss" or is removable from the housing unit which is permanently installed in the covered "auto" at the time of the "loss", and such equipment is designed to be solely operated by use of the power from the "autos" electrical system, in or upon the covered "autos"; or R. Notice Of And Knowledge Of Occurrence SECTION IV -BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS, A.2. Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim Suit Or Loss, subparagraph a. is deleted and replaced with the following: a. In the event of "accident", claim, "suif or "loss", you must give us or our authorized repre sentative prompt notice of the "accident" or "loss" including: (1) How, when and where the "accident" or "loss" occurred; (2) The "insured's" name and address; and (3) To the extent possible, the names and addresses of any injured person and witnesses. Your duty to give us or our authorized representative prompt notice of the "accident" or "loss" applies only when the "accident" or "loss" is known to: (1) You, if you are an individual; (2) A partner if you are a partnership; or (3) An executive officer or insurance manager, if you are a corporation. s. Unintentional Errors Or Omissions SECTION IV -BUSINESS AUTO CONDITIONS, B. General Conditions; 2. Concealment Misrepre sentation Or Fraud is amended by adding the following: The unintentional omission of, or unintentional error in, any information given by you shall not prejudice your rights under this insurance. However this pro vision does not affect our right to collect additional premium or exercise our right of cancellation or nonrenewal. T. Towing Coverage SECTION Ill -PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE, A.2. Towing, is deleted and replaced by the following: 2. We will pay up to $750 for towing and labor costs incurred each time a covered "auto" is disabled due to a covered cause of loss. However: a. All labor must be performed at the place of disablement; and b. If the covered auto is a private passenger type no deductible applies; and c. If the covered auto is not of the private passenger type our obligation to pay will be reduced by a $250 deductible per disablement. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS POLICY REMAIN UNCHANGED. PPA 300 03 13 Page 5 of 5 222 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT-CALIFORNIA WC 04 03 06 (Ed. 4-84) We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule. The additional premium for this endorsement shall be __ 2_% of the California workers' compensation premium otherwise due on such remuneration. Schedule Person or Organization All persons or organizations that are party to a contract that requires you to obtain this agreement, provided you executed the contract before the loss. Job Description Jobs performed for any person or organization that you have agreed with in a written contract to provide this agreement. This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. (The Information below Is required only when this endorsement Is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective 12/1/2025 Insured Environmental Science Associates Policy No. PSW0004135 Insurance Company RLI Insurance Company Endorsement No. Countersigned By ______________________ _ ©1998 by the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. All rights reserved. 223 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CEQA SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a California Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSUL TANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on-call environmental CEQA services; and Pursuant to documentati:m on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSUL TANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Konnie Dobreva who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSUL TANT in the performance of this Agreement. 26-17868/408355 l of I I 224 3. TERM· TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULT ANT are to commence on April 5, 2026 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than one year from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in Exhibit "A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSULT ANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSUL TANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000). 5. EXTRA WORK. In the event CITY reqmres additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSUL TANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit "B." 26-178681408355 2 of 11 225 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULT ANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS A. CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all elaims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULT ANT's ( or CONSUL TANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent (or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULT ANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULT ANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULT ANT. B. To the extent that CONSULTANT performs "Design Professional Services" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.8, then the following Hold Harmless provision applies in place of subsection A above: 26-17868/408355 3 of 11 226 "CONSULTANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of eve1y nature or liability of any kind or nature) to the extent that the claims against CONSULT ANT arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULT ANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT exceed CONSULTANT's proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more other defendants to the claims and/or litigation is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, CONSULT ANT shall meet and confer with CITY and other defendants regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in California Civil Code Section 2782.8. C. Regardless of whether subparagraph A or B applies, CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incun-ed by CITY in enforcing this obligation. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULT ANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULT ANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance 26-17868/408355 4 of 11 227 policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULT ANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULT ANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSUL TANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY' s election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSULT ANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work perfmmed pt~or to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSUL TANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: 26-17868/408355 A. B. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; state that the policy is currently in force; and 5 of 11 228 C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thi1iy (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULT ANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULT ANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULT ANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSUL TANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the 26-17868/408355 6 of 11 229 event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSUL TANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSUL TANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and l 0 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PA TENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULT ANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delive1y to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULT ANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delive1y, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail-return receipt requested: 26-17868/408355 7 of 11 230 TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Director of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT TO CONSULTANT: Environmental Planning Development Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Jeremy Krout 333 Michelson Drive, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 When CITY's consent/approval 1s required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or cou1t of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or 26-17868/408355 8 of 11 231 neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULT ANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSUL TANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 26-17868/408355 9 of 11 232 24. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing paity. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that paity or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set fo11h in this 26-17868/408355 10 of 11 233 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the patties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement , and supersede al l prior understandings and agreements w he th e r oral or in wr it ing betwee n the parties respecting the su bject matter he reof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This AgTeer~1en t shall be effective on the date of its approval by the C it y Council. T hi s Agreement sh all expire wh en terminated as prov id ed herein. fN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused th is Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. CONSULTANT, ENV lRONMENTA L PLi\NNfNG D EVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, fNC. print name ITS: (circle 011e) Chairma resident/Vice President By ~ print name ITS : (circle 011e Secretary Ch ief Financial O('[icer/ Asst. Secretary -Treas urer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEJ\.CH, a mun ic ipal corporation of the State of Ca liforn ia Mayor City Clerk [N l TIA TED AND A PPROV ED: --> ----------------- Director of Co mmuni ty Development REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Ma nager APPROVED AS TO FORM: /... City Attorney 26-17868/408355 11 of 11 234 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits , contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior under standings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29 . EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement s hall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and tlu·ough th eir authorized officers. CONSULTANT, ENVIRONMENT AL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. By: ____________ _ print name ITS: (c ircle one) Chairman/PresidentNice President AND By: ___________ _ pri nt name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary -Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California Mayor City Clerk INITIA¾ED AND APP OVED: I J I I ~J Director of Community Development REVIEWED AND APPRO VED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1"' City Attorney 26-17868/408355 11 of 11 235 EXHIBIT II A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) B. CONSUL TANT shall provide eonsulting serviees on an "as-needed" basis for projects to be determined during the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY shall issue task orders based upon scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to City for its review and approval CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: I. Furnish scope of work request for each project 2. Prepare associated reimbursement agreements and collect developer payments in a timely manner in conjunction with projects assigned. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by City. EXHIBIT A 236 EXHIBIT A 237 E I p I D SOLLITIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE ANO PASSION MEH ---------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... i Section A: Vendor Application Forms And Cover Letter ....................................................................... ii Cover Letter ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Section B: Background and Experience Section ................................................................................... 2 Firm Background & Bu siness Expertise .................................................................................................. 2 Firm Specialties and Capabilities ............................................................................................................ 2 Environmental Planning and Complia nce Services .......................................................................... 2 Techn ical Services ............................................................................................................................ 3 Statement of Understanding of Key HB Is sues and Challenges ............................................................. 4 Local, State, and Regional Experience .................................................................................................... 6 Summary of Relevant Experience ..................................................................................................... 6 Municipal On-Call Program Management Experience .................................................................... 6 EPD's Unique Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 7 Legal Challenges To Env ironmental Documents .................................................................................... 9 Project Management Methods and Controls ....................................................................................... 10 Management Approach for On-Call Services ................................................................................. 10 Quality Control and Quality Assurance .......................................................................................... 11 Cost Co ntrol, Budget Monitoring, and Schedule Management.. ................................................... 11 EPD's Client Satisfaction ....................................................................................................................... 12 Section C: Staffing ............................................................................................................................ 13 Key Personnel ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Subconsultants ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Section D: Qualifications and References .......................................................................................... 16 Huntington Beach Project Experience .................................................................................................. 16 Local References ................................................................................................................................... 18 Section E: Fee Schedule Tables ........................................................................... See Separate Cost File ADDITIONAL TABLES TABLE 1-Relevant Projects TA BLE 2 -Key Personnel Resume Summaries Due DIiigence I Entitlement Environmental Planning Development & Construction Management Polley Planning I Technical Services 3333 Michelson Dr. Suite 500 I Irvine, CA 92612 I 949.794.1180 I epd@epdsolutions.com 238 TYPE OF APPLICANT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM □NEW ~ CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc. Contact Person for Agreement: _T_ri_s_ha_B_a_k_er _________________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 333 Michelson Dr, Suite 500 City, State and Zip Code: Irvine, CA 92612 E-Mail Address: contracts@epdsolutions.com Phone: (949) 794-1180 Fax: N/A ---------- Contact Person for Proposals: _K_e_r_r_i T_u_tt_le _________________ _ Title: Sr. Manager of Business Strategy Business Telephone: (949 ) 794-11 BO Year Business was Established: 2013 E-Mail Address: ktuttle@epdsolutions.com Business Fax: N/ A ------- ----- Is your business: ( check one) □ NON PROFIT CORPORATION ~ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: ( check one) ~ CORPORATION 0 INDIVIDUAL □ PARTNERSHIP 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP □ SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP □ UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION I of2 239 Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Jeremy Krout Kennie Dobreva Title CEO VP Phone (949) 794-1181 (949) 794-1183 Federal Tax Identification Number: 46-3581692 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: A308802 (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 9/30/2026 2 of2 240 TYPE OF APPLICANT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM ~ NEW 0 CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: BFSA Environmental Services, A Perennial Company Contact Person for Agreement: _J_e_n_n_ife_r S_tr_o_p_es ______________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 13100 Northwest Freeway, Suite 150 City, State and Zip Code: Houston, Texas 77040 E-Mail Address: bfsa.perennialenv.com Phone: (858) 484-0915 Fax: ---------- Contact Person for Proposals: _J_e_n_n_ife_r _S_t_ro_p_e_s _____________ _ Title: Vice President E-Mail Address: jstropes@bfsa.perennialenv.com Business Telephone: (858 ) 484 -0915 ext 1 o3 Business Fax: ------- year Business was Established: _____ 1977 ----dcc Is your business: ( check one) 0 NON PROFIT CORPORATION ~ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: (check one) 0 CORPORATION 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 PARTNERSHIP ~ LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 0 SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP 0 UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION I of2 241 Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Title Phone Jonathan Fredland President (713) 462-7121 Jennifer Stropes Vice President (858) 484-0915 ext.103 Tracy Stropes Vice President (858) 484-0915 Ext. 102 Federal Tax Identification Number: 260623307 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 2of2 242 TYPE OF APPLICANT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM ~NEW 0 CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Roux Associates, Inc. Contact Person for Agreement: _N_a_n_c_y_A_n_g_l_in_,_P_E ______________ _ Corporate Mailing Address: 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450 City, State and Zip Code: Long Beach, CA 90804 E-Mail Address: nanglin@rouxinc.com Phone: (949) 795-6830 Fax: _________ _ Contact Person for Proposals: _N_a_n_c_y_A_n_g_li_n_, _P_E _____________ _ Title: Principal Engineer/ Operations Manager E-Mail Address: nanglin@rouxinc.com Business Telephone: (949) 795-6830 Year Business was Established: 1981 Business Fax: ______ _ ------- ls your business: ( check one) □NONPROFIT CORPORATION E] FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: ( check one) El CORPORATION 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP □ INDIVIDUAL □ SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP □ PARTNERSHIP □ UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION I of2 243 Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to s ign contracts) Names Michael Roux. PG Adarn Love. PhD Mary Macy Sin.Senh PG Charles-McGuckin Greyory Martin. PG. LSRP Linda Chiarelli. ·JO Chrfstopher Burns. PhD, PG Mauricio Escobar Jay Shipley Nancv Anqlfn Title Chairman ofBoard of Directors Director and Executive Vice President CFO/Board of Directors CEO/Board of Diredors Board of Directors Board of Directors Board of Directors. Phone 631-630-2425 415-967-6023 631-630-2444 631-630-2333 631-630-2346 S56-832~376O 631-232-2600 Board of Directors 631-232-2600 Vice President 310-879-4920 Nat'I Director of Pub[ic Sector SYU. & lndu:strial·Sy.c,s, 562~446-S642 Soulhern Catifomia Operations Man ager 562-446-8646 Federal Tax Identification Number: 11-2579482 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: None (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiratio n Date: 2 of2 244 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- COVER LETTER February 12, 2026 City of Huntington Beach Attn: Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Salazar, EPD Solutions, Inc. (EPD) is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications to provide on-call CEQA and environmental consulting services to the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department. EPD brings more than a decade of experience providing CEQA compliance and entitlement services to the City of Huntington Beach, and we have extensive experience delivering on-call planning and environmental consulting services to cities across Southern California. EPD's CEQA compliance and technical experience with Huntington Beach projects includes the Magnolia Tank Farm project, the Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Amendment, the Holly Triangle Town homes project, and development projects along the Goldenwest Street corridor. Our team possesses a thorough understanding of Huntington Beach's coastal planning environment, Local Coastal Program considerations, sensitive biological resources, SB 743/VMT requirements, and the heightened public scrutiny that often accompanies CEQA review for projects in the City. As an on-call consultant, EPD functions as an extension of City staff. We are accustomed to managing multiple concurrent task orders, responding quickly to staff requests, and tailoring the level of effort to match project complexity, schedule, and budget constraints. Our approach emphasizes early issue identification, practical CEQA streamlining, and the preparation of clear, defensible documents that support efficient decision -making by staff and elected officials. EPD's team offers depth of in-house technical expertise in traffic/VMT, air quality/ GHG analysis, noise, biological resources, and environmental planning, supported by senior-level QA/QC and legal defensibility review. When specialized expertise is required, EPD integrates trusted subconsultants as part of a coordinated project team, allowing the City to access additional resources without sacrificing consistency or responsiveness. This SOQ is submitted by an individual authorized to bind EPD Solutions. We affirm that our consultant fees and hourly rates will remain valid for at least 180 days from the date of this submission. EPD's headquarters is located in the City of Irvine, at 3333 Michelson Drive, Suite 500, Irvine, CA 92612 (phone: (949) 794-1180). We are always available to meet with you and your staff in person and look forward to discussing your future consulting needs in greater detail. I can be reached at (949) 794-1183 or at konnie@epdsolutions.com . Respectfu I ly, K1fe~ EPD Solutions, Inc. EPD Solutions, Inc. Konnie Dobreva, JD Vice President of Environmental Planning Page 1 of 20 245 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE ANO PASSION MEfl ---------------- SECTION B: BACKGROUND AND EXPERI ENCE SECTION FIRM BACKGROUND & BUSINESS EXPERTISE Formed in 2013, EPD Solutions, Inc. (EPD) is a full-service environmental planning and consulting firm dedicated to providing services of distinction, quality, and legal merit that optimize value and enhance the communities we serve. As innovators in our profession, EPD has developed a distinctive depth and breadth of experience in strategically advising municipalities through the environmental compliance process for complex planning and development initiatives. We apply current best practices that effectively leverage existing environmental documentation, streamline regulatory pathways, and accelerate approvals for subsequent project phases. The EPD team is prepared to bring our extensive environmental, planning, engineering, and regulatory expertise to support the City of Huntington Beach in achieving its short-and long-term strategic and comprehensive planning and development objectives. EPD brings extensive experience in CEQA, NEPA, and compliance with applicable local, State, and federal environmental laws and regulations. Our team has supported a broad spectrum of planning, development, and infrastructure projects, ranging from resident ial infill and mixed-use redevelopment to large-scale master-planned communities. EPD's team includes in-house technical experts in air quality, GHG emissions, energy, biological resources, visual simulation, noise, and transportation. We also hold Master Service Agreements with more than 65 technical specialty firms to ensure that our projects are never delayed by a workflow backlog. EPD's primary service categories include Environmental Planning; Technical Services; Due Diligence, Entitlements, Development, and Construction Management; and Policy Planning and Development. Our integration of environmental planning, technical analyses, and development se rvices provides our clients with a value-added approach that helps guide projects through the entire planning, analysis, and development process, and enables us to address a wide range of technical, legal, and policy issues on their behalf. FIRM SPECIALTIES AND CAPABILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES EPD's experience in implementing all phases of the environmental review process, combined with our thorough understanding of the complex federal, State, and local regulatory frameworks governing planning and development projects, enables the preparat i on of high-quality, legally defensible environmental documents and avoids costly delays in project implementation. We help municipal clients balance environmental protection with the efficient, beneficial, and cost effective delivery of projects that enhance residents' quality of life, strengthen community resilience, and support the achievement of long-term planning goals . EPD posse sses the professional experience and technical expertise necessary to deliver the full range of services associated with environmental documentation under CEQA and NEPA. Our team brings comprehensive familiarity with applicable re gu latory requirements and dee p expertise navigating City General Plans, Municipal Codes, Specific Plans, Local Coastal Programs, EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 2 of 20 246 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSfON MEET ---------------- and other relevant policy and planning frameworks. Our in-house experts have extensive experience in environmental compliance, project development, and permit processing, as well as conducting peer reviews of CEQA and NEPA documents, leading public scoping meetings, facilitating stakeholder engagement, and building public consensus. We routinely prepare, peer review, and process documentation that includes the follqwing: • Notices of Availability, Preparation, and Determination (NOAs, NOPs, NODs) • Categorical and Statutory Exemptions • Consistency Analyses and Streamlining Checklists • Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Supplemental and Subsequent EIRs, and EIR Addendums • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plans/Programs (MMRPs) & Compliance • Initial Studies, Negative Declarations (NDs), Monitoring Reports and Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs) • Supporting Technical Studies • Environmental Assessments (EAs) and • Peer Review Memorandums Findings of No Significant Impacts (FONSls) • Responses to Comments • Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) • Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Consideration Working collaboratively with our clients, EPD strategically manages the environmental process from the earliest planning stages through project approval, streamlining timelines, reducing risk, and ensuring efficient regulatory compliance. TECHNICAL SERVICES TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AND ANALYSES EPD recognizes the pivotal role that traffic-related matters play in a community and understands the risks to a project that transportation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts may present. Our transportation planners and engineers specialize in a wide range of transportation planning, traffic engineering, level of service (LOS) and VMT traffic studies, parking studies, and vehicular and pedestrian safety studies. EPD staff utilize traffic impact analysis software such as Vistro, Synchro, and TransCAD and are knowledgeable in the application of technical traffic analysis methodologies to projects of all types and sizes. We are experienced with implementing local traffic analysis requirements for agencies throughout Orange County and with projects that have significant VMT/traffic impacts. We also have extensive experience in the implementation of Senate Bill (SB) 743 requirements and have assisted local agencies with drafting defensible City specific VMT guidelines. We help municipalities develop implementable mitigation measures that are defensible under CEQA and the Mitigation Fee Act, comply with City goals and policies, and are consistent with adopted mitigation fee programs. EPD's Transportation Design Services include, but are not limited to, the preparation of traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans, temporary traffic control plans, on -site circulation and off-site improvements, line of sight analysis (stopping sight distance, intersection sight distance), gap analysis, and truck templates in AutoCAD, as applicable, following AASHTO and all appropriate design standards. EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 3 of 20 247 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHERE EXPERlENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSES, ENERGY STUDIES, AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS Air quality/GHG emissions and human health risks have become focal points on every project, which demands expert knowledge and the preparation of clear and concise analyses that include, when necessary, implementable mitigation measures. EPD's Technical Services team includes air quality specialists who are experienced in conducting Air Quality and GHG Assessments that comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements and guidance materials and with projects that have the potential to result in significant air quality impacts. EPD also prepares Health Risk Assessments (HRAs) and has working knowledge of SCAQMD's HRA requirements, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, and the California Air Resources Board HRA model, Hotspots Analysis Reporting Program (HARP). NOISE AND VIBRA T/ON IMPACT ASSESSMENTS EPD prepare s noise and vibration analyses to support CEQA documentation for development and public projects, with a focus on clear thresholds, defensible methodologies, an d practical mitigation measures. EPD evaluates both construction-related and operational noise sources, including grading and building construction, mechanical equipment, loading activities, and project-related traffic. In coastal and mixed-use settings, EPD also evaluates land use compatibility and noise sensitivity for projects near visitor-serving uses, parks, and residential neighborhoods. For projects with potential vibration sensitivity, EPD evaluates vi bration impacts associated with construction activities and equipment and recommends avoidance and minimization measures where needed. EPD also supports lead agencies with preparation of clear and enforceable mitigation measures, including construction management measures, equipment limitations, shielding/barriers, operational controls, and performance standards, as appropriate. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND REGULA TORY PERMITTING SERVICES EPD's biological services include baseline biological resource assess ments to su pport CEQA and land use entitlements, focused and protocol-level su rveys for sensitive species (e.g., burrowing owl, coastal California gnatcatcher, least Bell's vireo, Crotch's bumblebee), habitat evaluations for special-status plants and wildlife species, due diligence st udies, consistency analyses, nesting bird surveys, various pre-construction clearance surveys for plants and wildlife species, and biological monitoring. Our team of specialists conduct aquatic resource delineations in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CD FW) requirements, riparian habitat assessments, and wetland delineations. For complex or phased projects, our services include the preparation of long-term habitat mitigation and monitoring plans, long-term management plan s, conservation easement coordination, compliance monitoring, and integration of biological mitigation into Specific Plans, General Plan updates, and large-scale entitlement programs. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF KEY HB ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Having supported dozens of projects in Huntington Beach, EPD recognizes that resiliency planning is an operational nece ssity-integral to managing development inten sity, regul ato ry EPD So lutions, Inc. Page 4 of 20 248 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- compliance, and long-term coastal hazards within a dynamic and highly regulated coastal environment. Huntington Beach's General Plan and Coastal Resiliency Program explicitly identify low -lying areas -including Sunset Beach, Huntington Harbour, and zones south of the Pier -as highly vulnerable to projected sea level rise and associated flooding by mid-century, framing resiliency as a regulatory and infrastructural priority in every major development review. The California Coastal Commission recently approved a $499,000 grant to the City to plan for sea level rise, including to update its Local Coastal Program (LCP), Coastal Resilience Plan, an d Floodplain Ordinance. Recent and proposed developments such as infill in the downtown core and waterfront projects at Huntington Harbour bring these issues to the forefront, requiring developers to integrate adaptive design measures and hazard mitigation strategies that go beyond minimum code compliance. These projects are reviewed under CEQA and Coastal Act frameworks that increasingly demand sophisticated modeling for future sea level rise scenarios, shorel ine change, and storm impacts as part of environmental documentation, and EPD's team has experience successfully navigating these frameworks. Huntington Beach developers must navigate the complex intersection of housing demand, State policy enforcement, and coastal resource protection. The City's ongoing efforts to advance housing projects -from small coastal residential developments along Pacific Coast Highway to larger master plans like the Magnolia Tank Farm site -must reconcile policies for public access, visual resources, shoreline hazards, and environmentally sensitive habitat areas. EPD well understands the growing tension between local autonomy and State land-use mandates in high impact geographies, and we know the City faces grow ing tensions to accommodate growth, adopt compliant housing planning in its Housing Element, and meet its certified LCP and Coastal Act obligations. EPD regularly advises clients on Housing Element consistency and entitlement strategy, and leads complex regulatory coordination efforts for projects requiring LCP amendments, substantial Coastal Development Permits, and concurrent City and Coastal Commission approvals. EPD's role on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project (2016-2020) demonstrates this expertise, encompassing pre-entitlement strategy, entitlement processing, project management, and full CEQA compliance. Biological sensitivity is a defining feature of Huntington Beach's coastal planning environment, given the proximity of major development sites to critical habitats such as the Balsa Chica Ecological Reserve and the Huntington State Beach Dunes. Projects like the Huntington State Beach Dune Restoration Project highlight the City's commitment to protecting coastal species, enhancing ecosystem function, and strengthening resilience to sea level rise. For developments near these sensitive resources, EPD leads comprehensive biological surveys, multi-agency coordination, and mitigation strategies that integrate habitat protection into project design, support regulatory compliance, and ensure long-term project viability. EPD has developed an approach to environmental compliance that emphasizes early issue identification, clear communication, and objective, technically robust analysis to proactively address the regulatory, technical, and public challenges commonly encountered by development projects in Huntington Beach's highly dynamic and closely scrutinized planning environment. EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 5 of 20 249 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERlEMCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- LOCAL, STATE, AND REGIONAL EXPERIENCE SUMMARY OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE EPD has extensive experience preparing and reviewing CEQA documents for municipal planning and development projects similar in scope, complexity, and regulatory context to those anticipated by the City of Huntington Beach . Over the past 13 years, EPD has supported cities and public agencies throughout Southern California with on-call CEQA services, including the preparation of Initial Studies, NDs/MNDs, EIRs, CEQA addenda and streamlining analyses, and technical studies, peer review services, and interagency coordination . Over the last decade, we have prepared more than 230 CEQA documents for proposed projects in Orange County and more than 2,200 projects in southern California . EPD's recent work for the City of Tustin demonstrates our ability to manage multiple complex CEQA efforts concurrently under aggressive schedules. EPD prepared two expedited El Rs and one SEIR concurrently for the City of Tustin's three major rezone efforts related to the City's approved Housing Element shortfall sites. Each project required the preparation of independent VMT Analyses, Traffic Impact Assessments, Air Quality Impact Analyses, Noise Impact Analyses, and Cultural Resources Assessments to support the CEQA findings, and all three El Rs were prepared and publicly circulated within one year of the kickoff date with the City. These projects demonstrate EPD's ability to deliver high-quality work on accelerated schedules to meet State housing law deadlines and deliver legally defensible CEQA documents that advance critical policy objectives . As an on-call consultant to the City of Irvine, EPD functions as an extension of City staff, conducting expedited peer reviews of applicant-prepared CEQA documents and technical studies and advi sing City staff on CEQA strategy and legal defensibility. In the last year w e ha ve peer reviewed documentation for eight consecutive projects for the City, demonstrating our team's depth and capacity to perform . EPD's direct experience working with the City of Huntington Beach includes the pr epa r ation of an Addendum to the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan EIR No. 89-1 (SCH No. 89010412), origin ally certified by the City in 1990. This effort demonstrates our team 's ability to strategically levera ge prior CEQA documentation, streamline environmental review, and deliver efficient, defensible CEQA compliance and technical analysis services that are al igned with Huntington Beach's development environment and rigorous analytical standards. Please see Section D: Qualifications and References for local agency references and Table 1 at the end of this document for selected project examples and details. MUNICIPAL ON-CALL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE EPD has extensive experience providing on -call environmental planning service s to jurisdictions throughout California. Since the company was founded, EPD has be en the only on -call environmental consultant providing CEQA, technical, and construction management services to the South Orange County Community College District, and we are the City of Redlands' preferred on -call environmental consultant for all City-initiated project s. EPD al so provides on-call EPD Solution s, In c. Page 6 of 20 250 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- environmental and planning consultin g services to Communit y Deve lopment and Planning Depa rtment s in the following jurisdiction s: Cities: Anaheim; Berke l ey; Brea; Cerritos; Colton; Costa Mesa ; Covina; Dow ney; Fontana ; Garden Grove; Hanford ; Highland; Irvine; La Habra; La Mesa; Laguna Niguel; Lake Elsinore; Los Ange l es; Me n ifee; Ontario; Orange; Palmdal e; Palm Desert; Rancho Cucamonga; Redlands; Richmond; Ri verside; Rosemead; San Fern ando; San Jacinto; San Juan Capistrano; San Marco s; Santa Ana; Sant a Fe Springs; Tu stin ; Whittier; Wildom ar ; Yorba Linda; Yucaipa . Counties: County of Colusa; Cou nty of Los Angeles; County of Ri ver sid e; County of San Diego. Other Public Agencies: Anaheim Public Utilities District; Orange Unified School Di strict; Unifi ed Port of San Diego; San Luis Obi spo Coun cil of Gove rnm ents; North Orange County Community Colleges Di strict; Town of Apple Valley ; Town of Yu cca Valley. Our breadth of on -call ex perience demonstrates EPD's ab i lity to function as an extension of agency staff, mana ge multiple concurrent t ask ord ers, and provid e con sistent, defensibl e CEQA servi ces ta ilored to local policy fram eworks and community priorities across multi -year t im e li ne s. EPD'S UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS EPD provides a unique blend of exceptional se rvice and st aff re sou r ces, an inclu sive cultur e, notable clients, sophi sticated projects, and a di stinct, integrati ve approach to doin g busin ess. DUR ADV ANT AGE Responsive, Proven, Client-Focused Defensible Approach Res ults We don't Just chock Sinco 2013, EPD has bokeS. completed over We p artner c lo11ly with 2,000+ our clients to turn Ideas environmental and Into places lhal woric-ror planning documents people, business, and lhe community. 30M •q. fl or Industrial projects Our work Is grounded in clear, c on IlI tent 20,000+ mutu and c ommunlc:atlon, direct slnglo-famny homos acco11lbllity l o senior staff. and an ague team. ProJocts lncludo complox, controvorsial projects . Our CEQA docomontatlon streamlines 1he environmental compliance procon and racU~atos tho preparation of legally d efen 1lble d ocument• lhat can withs tand pubUc scrutiny and polenlfal legal chaDenge. EPD So luti o n s, In c. CEQA & Regulatory Leadership EPD brings a proven track record In leading CEQA and tntlUament ■lra te gl•• for complox projects acrnH Orange County end Southern California, Our environmental planners havo tho technloal •rwdlblllty roqul rod for dra!Ung high- quality documents that moot client oxpoctallon1 end agency roqul romonts. Wobalanco onvlro nmant a l prolo~llon with tho successful Implementation of efficlont, bonoflcial, end a cost-offccllvo approach to tho CEOA process Deep Local Expertise Southern Callfornla Is o ur h ome m arket. Our 10am ltvos and woru throughout Orange Coonty, bringing long-standing reg ulatory agency rel1Uon1hlp1 and real local Insigh t that national firms can't replicate. Our o,dstlng oxporionce and working relaUonah lpa with HunUngton Bo3ch staff and doclslon-makors, aUows us lo navigato p,oeesses efficlentJy and anUcipato Issues before they arise. This daop local Insight, combined w ith a strong understanding or community priorities , enables us lo deliver praclicaJ. Informed strategies and documentaUon that successfully advance projects. E I P I D SOLUT I ONS.INC Integrated Service Model A defining strength of EPO Is our integr ated ••rvlc• m odel , By aligning environmonlal plannlng1 onliUoment strategy, and lechnicaf analysis within a single m ultldloclp llnary loam, we p,oacllvely manage r isk, 1lreamllno rovlows, and maintain conslsloncy across project dollve,ablo1. We runcUon as an er:ttntlon o f our cll,nt'• pl1 nnlng 1t1ff -•upportlng projects and agency staff kom early due dijlgence through public hearings lnlo post-enlillemenl support. Page 7 of 20 251 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- POLICY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT EPD's versatile team of planners routinely supports municipal clients with a wide range of traditional planning services, functioning seamlessly as an extension of City staff. The broad ex perience of EPD's staff members enables EPD to prepare interdepartmental memo s and staff reports, develop Conditions of Approval, draft resolutions and ordinances, Findings, and Resolutions, and present before decision-making bodies on behalf of the cities w e serve. Our team assists decision-makers at every level of the planning organization-from Associate to Principal Planners in both Current and Advanced Planning. This includes adv ising on the appropriate level of environmental documentation, supporting cities in adopting standards that reflect up-to-date State legislation , and pivoting to more traditional, comprehensive documentation for complex or controversial projects where a robust administrative record is essential. EPD's planning staff also has ex pertise to assist with planning-related tasks such as, but not limited to , conducting research on va r ious land use and planning issues, assisting City staff in reviewing applications and/or the review of applications and plans for completene ss and adequacy. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH EPD's team has significant expertise in public participation and community outreach activities and can lead public workshops, charrettes, and other community outreach efforts to maximize public involvement. EPD will coordinate , prepare handouts, questionnaires and PowerPoint presentations, and as needed, lead public scoping meeting s, public workshops, and/or public hearings as necessary for projects. EPD will also be available to consult with all applicable federal , State, and local agencies, stakeholders, and the public as requested by the City. EPD also has extensive experience in conducting tribal consultations and can assist the City with organizing and facilitating required tribal consultations under SB 18 and AB 52 . DUE DILIGENCE, ENTITLEMENTS, DEVELOPMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EPD seeks to understand our client's goals before embarking on due diligence activ ities so we can constantly measure a property's potential for achieving those goals. Through rigorou s and tested means, we analyze issue s such as physical obstacles to dev elopment, including but not limited to existing and planned infrastructure locations and capacities, biologic al, cultural and site constructability concerns, planning and development policies that could affect the viability of a project design or entitlement process, entitlement processing schedules, fee estimating, and social political considerations . We provide thorough and robust analyses in support of entitlement strategy-setting and financing packages, creating confidence in project viabil ity, because we thoroughly understand the geographic, socia l, regulatory, and political land scape s in which ou r clients seek to develop projects. SPECIALIZED STAFF TRAINING EPD prioritizes knowledge-sharing and capacity-building for the municipalities we support by providing tailored CEQA training to lead agency staff. Topics include foundational CEQA concepts, annual legi slative updates, Hou sing Element requirements, and the use of CEQA streamlinin g EP D So lutio ns, Inc. Page 8 of 20 252 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- provisions, such as tiering from certified Program-and Project-level EIRs . EPD's team hosts interactive workshops, seminars, and individualized mentorship programs, covering both technical and regulatory developments that are geographically tailored to each agency's needs. We recognize that legally defensible outcomes depend on a shared understanding of CEQA requirements, best practices, and emerging case law. Our specialized training programs are practical and directly applicable to staffs day-to-day responsibilities, covering topics such as recent CEQA court decisions, defensible findings and statements of overriding considerations, administrative record development, public comment responses, and coordination between planning, public works, and legal counsel. By pairing rigorous environme ntal analysis with proactive staff education, EPD supports lead agencies in making informed, well-documented decisions that stand up to scrutiny. This integrated approach not only strengthens legal defensibility but also improves efficiency, consistency, and confidence throughout the entitlement and environmental review process. LEGAL CHALLENGES TO ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS In a regulatory environment as complex and closely scrutinized as Huntington Beach, legal defensibility is a critical consideration for both project-level approvals and long-range planning initiatives. Over the past 13 years, EPD has produced more than 2,000 CEQA documents, sev eral of which have been subject to legal challenge-reflecting the inherently contentious nature of land use and development in California, rather than deficiencies in the documents themselves. Throughout this period, EPD has worked closely with lead agency staff and legal counsel to support the administrative record, respond effectively to litigation, and defend the technical basis of our analyses. As a result, none of EPD's projects have been invalidated or denied due to deficiencies in the environmental analysis, underscoring our commitment to producing legally defensible, high -quality environmental documents. After more than a decade of continuous practice, only one environmental document has required limited analytical refinement as a result of a legal writ of mandate -and that outcome did not invalidate the overall document or ass ociated project approval s, but instead involved targeted revisions consistent with the court's direction. This record reflects EPD's empha sis on conservative, well-supported analyses; clear and enforceable mitigation ; and a disciplined approach to is sue identification and documentation-all of which are hallmarks of CEQA documents that withstand legal scrutiny. EPD Solution s, Inc. Pag e 9 of 20 253 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS ,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODS AND CONTROLS MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR ON-CALL SERVICES DUR PROJECT QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY E I PID SOLUTIONS ,I NC Each project receives specialized attention and senior-level expertise, ensuring the highest quality and efficiency. Senior Leadership personally oversees the progress, providing strategic guidance and leveraging years of Industry experience to deliver exceptional results. Our commitment 10 exceltence ensures that every project meets our rigorous standards and exceeds client expec:taUoo~. • Simpliticd iJnd Efficient Communication • Timely Response • Monthly Updates • 81,wcckty Meetings • Clear Communication of Expectations • Collaboration with Technical E>perts • Continuous Monitoring o f Costs, Schedule, and Resoorces • Live Schedule • General Plan & Municipal Code expertise • Rcsponso to Comm<'nl Samples • Condition of Approval Clc~mmccs • Community Outreach Technical Editor Director of Development Sr, Project Manager Project Coordinator VP Environmental Planning Principal Planner Environmental Planner Associate Planner Direc tor of Technical Services Drawing on extensive experience preparing and peer-reviewing CEQA and NEPA documents and technic al stud ies, EPD has developed a management approach that facilitates , expedites, and simplifi es the environmenta l compliance process . Key elements of this approach include: • Establishing clear roles, re sponsibilities, and open lines of communication to ensure hi gh quality deliverables and adherence to schedule and budget. • Maintainin g a single senior point of contact for coordination and assign i ng staff who remain with each project from start to finish. • Holding regular team meetings to provide updates, identify and resolve data gaps, and keep projects moving efficientl y toward approval and construction. • De ve loping technical strategies and outlining multiple "what-if" paths to anticipate challenges an d minimize surpri ses . EPD So lution s, Inc. Page 10 of 20 254 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- ■ Assigning seasoned practitioners who are recognized experts in their fields-individuals familiar to agency staff, respected by decision makers, and current on the latest regulations and legal precedents. • Delivering well-vetted, thoroughly reviewed work products that undergo senior-level quality control prior to submittal. • Resolving inconsistencies proactively and collaboratively to avoid delays and maintain project momentum. • Maintaining flexibility to adjust course as needed at the client's direction while communicating the implications, alternatives, and potential outcomes of any change. ■ Identifying potential environmental impacts early in the process to enable development of innovative design, mitigation, and environmental solutions. ■ Sustaining strong working relationships with City, County, and State agencies with jurisdiction over resources of concern. EPD's on-call clients value project managers who are responsive, resourceful, and proactive able to adapt quickly to changing circumstances and deliver creative, effective solutions under pressure. Our commitment to responsiveness and efficiency drives repeat success and long-term client partnerships. We rely on proven methods and templates that have demonstrated success, allowing us to deliver consistent, high-quality results. EPD also maintains a deep bench of in house and external expertise, cultivated through long-standing partnerships with trusted specialists who share our commitment to excellence and our ability to manage multiple complex projects simultaneously. QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE Quality control and assurance is integrated into EPD's project preparation, review, and delivery processes. EPD conducts weekly team meetings to ensure that key team members stay up to date on projects and ensure that support is provided where needed. EPD inputs project information and shareable, living schedules into shared Smartsheet, where teams can stay up to date on project tasks and deadlines and provide progress notes along the way. As project documentation is finalized, EPD performs ;;in internal peer and Project Manager review, followed by technical editing and senior level review to ensure that documentation is consistent, accurate, complete, and organized prior to submitting to clients. EPD's standard QA/QC process is also supported by in-house legal review to ensure that EPD's environmental and planning documents are legally defensible and comply with all applicable local, State, and federal laws. COST CONTROL, BUDGET MONITORING, AND SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT EPD maintains rigorous internal controls and management systems to ensure that projects are completed within approved budgets, schedules, and scopes. Our approach provides real -time visibility into project performance, enabling our team to maintain strict cost control, immediately address misalignments, and deliver accurate, timely invoices. EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 11 of 20 255 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- INTERNAL CONTROLS AND COST MANAGEMENT EPD utilizes Deltek Vantagepoint, an enterprise resource planning system tailored for professional services firms that enables budget management, expenditure tracking, and cost forecasting, boosting visibility and efficiency. This platform allows Project Managers and sen ior leadership to instantly review project budgets, labor utilization, subconsultant costs, and contract balances daily, ensuring that all work aligns with authorized task orders and client expectations. Project invoices are generated directly from Deltek Vantagepoint and undergo a three-step internal review: first by the Project Manager to verify scope and task completion , then by the senior director overseeing the program of services. Thi s tiered review process ensures that all invoices are clear, compliant, and subm itted promptly to the appropriate reviewing authorities. BUDGET AND SCHEDULE MONITORING Using Deltek's dashboard and reporting tools, EPD monitors project performance in real time comparing actual versus budgeted hours, direct expenses, and schedu le milestones . Regular internal progress reviews reinforce accountability and provide opportunities for early corrective actions, when appropriate. At-a-glance monitoring also gives visibility to EPD's managers and leaders to enable accurate workload forecasting and bal ancing, which is particularly useful when managing multiple simultaneous project deliveries for our municipal on-call clients. TECHNIQUES FOR ON-TIME PROJECT DELIVERY EPD's team employs a combination of structured project planning and communication strategies to meet all scheduled commitments: • Detailed work plans w ith defined milestones, deliverables, and review periods . • Weekly project status meetings to track progress and coord inate with City staff. • Real-time task tracking and forecasting in Deltek Vantagepoint to monitor upcoming deadlines and staff work loads. • Proactive communication and issue resolution to prevent delays and maintain schedu le integrity. By combining the capabilities of De Itek Vantage point with disciplined management practices and transparent client communication, EPD ensures all projects are delivered within approved budgets, schedules, and scopes -consistently and reliably. EPD'S CLIENT SATISFACTION EPD understands that successful on-call consulting depends on more than technical expertise it requires responsiveness, flexibility, and a collaborative working relat i onship with City staff. EPD approaches on-call assignments as an extension of City staff, providing rel iabl e support that aligns with the City's goals, schedules, and internal workflows. EPD's commitment to client satisfaction includes: EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 12 of 20 256 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- ■ Responsiveness and access. EPD assigns senior-level project managers who are readily available to respond to City inquiries and coordinate with applicants, technical consultants, and agencies as needed. ■ Flexibility. EPD has the capacity to support both small-scale projects requiring expedited review and large, complex projects requiring sustained coordination and oversight, often concurrently . ■ Clear communication . EPD provides clear direction, consolidated comments, and well organized deliverables that reduce review time and facilitate efficient decision-making . ■ Cost-conscious service delivery. EPD emphasizes appropriate CEQA pathway selection, tiering from existing environmental documents, and CEQA streamlining opportunities to control costs while maintaining defensibility. ■ Public-sector perspective . EPD's team includes former public-sector planners from cities across Orange County who bring firsthand knowledge of municipal processes and accountability. Our team knows how to efficiently prepare staff reports, hearing materials, and clear, well-supported responses to decision-maker questions, and our City partners speak highly of our collaborative, reliable approach . EPD seeks to build a long-term partnership with the City of Huntington Beach that supports timely approvals, reduces risk, and delivers consistent, high-quality CEQA services throughout the on call contract term . SECTION C: STAFFING KEY PERSONNEL Key perso nnel who wou ld be committed to the City of Huntington Bea ch for the duration of the on-call contract are listed below. All of EPD's senior leaders have public sector experience and under sta nd the unique challenges and needs of public agencies. The following table identifies the key personnel who would delive r high -quality environmental and technical services to the City of Huntington Beach . Resume summaries fo r key personnel are included in Table 2, Key Personnel Resume Summaries . An organi zational chart depicting EPD's full CEQA and Technical Services delivery team follows the table below. Full resumes for EPD's team are available upon request. TEAM PROPOSED PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES CEQA STRENGTHS MEMBER ROLE KONNIE Principal-in-Senior oversight; CEQA CEQA Strategy/ Leg al DOBREVA,JD Charge streamlining; defensibility Defensibility review; hearings support TERRANCE Senior CEQA Peer review; quality control; Peer Review, RTC Support, SMALLS Lead / QA/QC task order support CEQA Compliance, QA/QC SHAWN Director of Biological eva luation s, focused Defensible biolog ical impact GATCHEL-Biological surveys, mitigation strategies, analyses and permitting HERNANDEZ Services and regulato ry permitting strategies EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 13 of 20 257 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- TEAM PROPOSED PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES CEQA STRENGTHS MEMBER ROLE MEAGHAN CEQA Project Project management; IS/MNDs, EIRs, Admin TRUMAN Manager documentation; coordination Record, Tech Studies MEGHAN Technical Technical Studies Preparation CEQA Supporting Technical MACIAS, TE Studies Lead and Peer Review Analyses ALEX Technical AQ/GHG/Energy Modeling; Quantitative Analysis; GARBER Specialist Technical Consistency Mitigation Development SUBCONSULTANTS BFSA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -Archaeological, Historical, Cultural, and Paleontological Resource Assessments supporting CEQA and NEPA Documentation Requirements BFSA has been operating since 1977 as Brian F. Smith and Associates and since 2022 as BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, providing environmental consulting services to public and 13FSA l::tl\'lru1111 1t•111,J ~:!~1".!:::~ private clients for archaeological, paleontological, biological, and historical projects throughout southern California and across the western United States. The BFSA team has managed projects for all levels of industry from single homeowners to global companies. The combined experience of their principal consultants and associates represents more than one hundred years of involvement in the study of the history and prehistory of this region. Each senior staff member exceeds the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, with a range of expertise in environmental compliance laws and regulations, including CEQA, NEPA, SEPA, and NHPA. BFSA has the largest conti nuou sly operational cultural resource staff in southern California and, as a result, can meet the staffing needs of any project no matter how large or small. BFSA often conducts multiple large-scale projects simu ltaneously, serving the needs of all their clients while maintaining and delivering high-quality products on schedule. Proven Subconsultant Teaming: EPD + BFSA EPD has completed more than 150 projects with BFSA providing expert cultural resources advisory services, including numerous projects completed EPD's our on-call contracts with the City of Menifee, City of Tu stin, City of Santa Fe Springs, City of Fontana, City of Irvine, and City of Santa Ana. EPD So luti ons, Inc . Page 14 of 20 258 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,I N C WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET Biologic.al Resources Shawn Galchel He<nande, Dir of Biological Servtces Cruz Hernandez Biologist EPD So lutions, Inc. ' Je<emy Krout, AICP, LEED GA CEO Konnie Dobreva, JO Norah Jaffan Sr Director VP of Environmental Planning Environmental Planning Terrance Smalls Environmental Pnnc1pal Planner Renee ~scarlo. Sr. Assoc ProJect Manager M ea ghan Truman Sr Environmental Planner Tatiana Torres A.s'iOc Env,rorunental Planner Tanya Kalaskllr Assoc. Environmental Planner Megan Rupard Assoc. Environmental Planner Jazmin Rodriguez Assist. Environmental Planner Sam Kelley Assist. Environmental Planner Brady Connolly Assist. Environmental Planner Alexis Brito Assist. Environmental Planner Lauren Battle Environmental Project Coord. Clara Eddy Environmental Project Coord. caelyn Smith Envlronmemal Project Coord. Hashem Basrawi, EIT Transportation Engineer Michael Torres, TE Transportation Engineer Simon Un Transportation Planner Sina Salehipour Assist. Transportation PlaMer Jordan M ower Assist. Transportation Planner Tiffany Dang Air Quality Specialist Elaina Olambers Air Quality Specialist Maryam Javanmardi Air Quality Specialist Document Support A llison Dagg Technical Editor Cameron lukos GIS Specialist Subconsullants BFSA (Archoeolo,;iist, Historical, Cultural, and Pofeontofogicol Resources} Jennifer Stropes, RPA VP of California Operations/Principal Historian Tracy St ropes, RPA VP of Cultural Resources/Princi pal Archaeologi st Todd Wirths, PG Sr. Paleontologist An drew Garrison, RPA Sr. Project Archaeologi st Roux Associates, Inc. /Hazardous Materials Technical Review, Phase 1/11 ESA Peer Revi ew, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Review, Human Risk Considerations) Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP Operations Manager Davi d Devr ies, PG, CHg Senior Hydrologist Page 15 of 20 259 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WHEIE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ----------------- ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. -Hazardous Materials Technical Review, Phase I/II ESA Peer Review, Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Review (VIMS), and Human Health Risk Considerations supporting CEQA and NEPA Documentation Requirements I i{ t 1I):t Roux ~ssociates, l~c. {Roux) provides _environmental scienc~, remediati~n, ... ------compliance, and nsk assessment services that support environmental site characterization, regulatory permitting, and technical analyses integral to defensible CEQA documentation. Roux's multidisciplinary team assists with field investigation, remedial strategy input, risk evaluation, and other technical components to support a comprehensive CEQA analysis. Roux is currently executing multi-year work at two Huntington Beach dry cleaning facilities where we have performed indoor air and soil vapor sampling; designed, permitted, and installed soil vapor extraction {SVE) systems; and conducted weekly system monitoring and monthly influent/effluent sampling as part of ongoing SVE operations. Proven Subconsultant Teaming: EPD + Roux Associates, Inc. EPD and Roux worked closely with City Staff and the Huntington Beach Fire Department on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project to help understand the site's complex hazards history including the adjacent former Ascon Landfill-a California Superfund site that received industrial, oil field, and construction wastes for decades and continues to undergo remediation-and provide a comprehensive summary and analysis to support City decision-making and inform and simplify the information for the EIR .Roux recently provided peer review services for the Lake land Apartments and Washington Blvd. projects in the City of Santa Fe Springs under EPD's on-call contract. EPD served as the prime consultant coordinating the overall peer review effort, and Roux provided specialized hazardous materials and vapor intrusion expertise, to peer review and approve the vapor intrusion mitigation system {VIMS) design on behalf of the City Fire Dept. SECTION D: QUALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT EXPERIENCE EPD's team has provided CEQA compliance, technical analysis, and entitlement processing services for development and planning projects in the City of Huntington Beach for more than a decade. Our Huntington Beach work includ es preparation of CEQA documentation, peer review of applicant-prepared technical studies, transportation and VMT analysis, interagency coordination, and support through public hearings and California Coastal Commission processes. The following are descriptions of projects that EPD has worked on in Huntington Beach. Please note that additional project details are summarized in Table 1. Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program EIR {2016-2020) I CEQA and Entitlement Support EPD provided SLF -HB Magnolia, LLC with ongoing project management, environmenta l compliance, technical analysis, and entitlement management services for the Huntington Beach Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Services included pre-entitlement management, site constraints analyses, preliminary environmental compliance support, and staff and stakeholder outreach. EPD also provided support to the applicant's team during the response to comments on the Draft EIR, as wel l as during City Council hearings and California Coastal Commission processing. EPD's EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 16 of 20 260 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- team peer reviewed air quality technical documents for the Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan Program EIR to ensure consistency with SCAQMD guidelines, validate assumptions used in emission modeling and provide targeted recommendations to strengthen the air quality and GHG emissions analysis included in the Program EIR. Roux contributed to the CEQA-related technical studies and environmental analyses, performed Phase 1/11 Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), prepared a soil management plan, and developed multiple vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) design and construction -su pport documents. These efforts included preparing background assessments, outlining engineering tasks for methane and vapor mitigation in accordance with City of Huntington Beach specifications, and developing cost estimates and technical scopes for both preliminary and construction-phase VIMS packages. Additionally, Roux's understanding of the site is informed by historical environmental records and prior corrective actions completed under Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) oversight. Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan Amendment (2024-2025) I Transportation and VMT Analysis; Comprehensive Peer Review Services EPD provided transportation planning and traffic analysis services for a proposed amendment to the Palm/Goldenwest Specific Plan involving a 90-acre site north of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between Seapoint Street and Goldenwest Street. EPD prepared trip cap calculations for multiple design alternatives, supported circulation planning, and prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis and SB 743-compliant VMT analysis. This work reflects EPD's familiarity with Huntington Beach 's transportation framework and expectations for defensible technical analysis for la rge, policy level projects. EPD is also providing transportation design services for the project, including conceptual design plans for the proposed on-site roundabout and three proposed signalized intersections providing access to the project from PCH. In addition to the transportation planning and design work on this project, EPD i s also providing technical and environmental peer review services for the proposed Palm Go l d enwest Specific Plan Amendment. We are conducting a comprehensive peer review of all technical studies and associated CEQA document prepared by the City's consultant, LSA, to ensure CEQA adequacy and legal defensibility. Throughout the process, EPD will be working collaboratively with the project team to ensure the CEQA documentation accurately reflects the project description, entitlements, and mitigation strategy. EPD will also focus on reducing litigation risk by avoiding unclear, infeasible, or overly burden some mitigation measures that could affect project feasibility, financing, or implementation . Holly Triangle Townhomes (2022) I CEQA Addendum and Technical Study Peer Review As one of the City's qualified on-call consultants (2019-2022), EPD prepared an Addendum to the Holly-Seac liff Specific Plan EIR for the redevelopment of a constrained 2.11-acre infill site into 35 townhomes. EPD's team peer reviewed technical studies addressing air quality/GHG emissions, geotechnical conditions, noise, hydrology, and water quality, supporting a streamlined and legally defensible entitlement process . 19026 Goldenwest Street Commercial (2025) I CEQA Addendum and Technical Review EPD prepared Addendum No . 2 to the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan EIR evaluating subdivision and deve lopment of a fuel center and car wash. EPD prepared in-house air quality, energy, and GHG EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 17 of 20 261 E I p I D SOLUTIONS,INC WKEAE EXPERJENCE ANO PASSION MEET ---------------- analyses and peer reviewed supporting technical studies. The project was approved by the City in December 2025. Huntington Club Remodel {2025) I CEQA Exemption and Technical Support EPD prepared a Class 32 Infill CEQA Exemption and supporting air quality analysis for redevelopment of an existing recreational facility, and peer reviewed applicant-prepared technical studies. EPD's direct experience in Huntington Beach experience enables our team to provide on-call support that is responsive, consistent with local policy, and aligned with City expectations. LOCAL REFERENCES The following agency representatives have significant experience working with EPD staff on a range of projects: CITY OF IRVINE -Professional Consulting Services as an On-call Program Member for the Environmental Impact Analysis and Traffic Studies Specialty Areas, City of Irvi ne Community Development Department, Planning Division, 2024-2029 Project Description: EPD provides on -ca ll services to the City of Irvine under a master agreement for professional services . To date, we have completed peer review and technical services for more than 10 City projects, working as an extension of City staff to review Contact Information: Eric Martin, Senior Planner, {949) 724-7519, ermartin@cityofirvine.org CITY OF TUSTIN -On-Call CEQA and Environmental Consulting Services for the City of Tustin, including Housing Element and RHNA Implementation (2021-Present) Project Description: EPD has been an on-call environmental consultant to the City of Tustin since 2021. We recently assisted with the preparation of the City of Tustin 's Housing Element 6th Cycle Update and the supporting Initial Study and Negative Declaration . The Housing Element Update provided a plan to meet anticipated population growth and housing needs, including incorporation of an additional 6,782 housing units to meet Regional Housing Needs Allocation accommodating varying income distributions. EPD worked with the City to meet an aggressive schedule and obtain certification of the Housing Element on time. We were then retained by the City to prepare CEQA documentation and technical studies for three concurrent Housing Element implementation and RHNA rezoning efforts {two EIRs and one Supplemental EIR), along with supporting technical studies. Additional assignments include preparation of CEQA exemptions and hearing support, peer review and preparation of IS/MND documentation for development projects, and preparation of streamlining documentation such as CEQA Guideline s Section 15162 consistency memoranda. Contact Information: Raymond Barragan, Principal Planner, (714) 573 -3016, rbarragan@tustinca .o rg EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 18 of 20 262 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AMO PASSION MEET ---------------- CITY OF SANTA ANA-On-call Environmental. Technical and Planning Services for the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency, 2019-2028 Project Description: EPD provides the City of Santa Ana with on-call CEQA services for both City initiated and development projects, including preparation of CEQA documents, peer review of applicant-prepared technical studies, interagency coordination , and support through public meetings and hearings. We recently provided CEQA compliance services for the Related Bristol Specific Plan, which involved the development of 3,750 r esidential units, 350,000 sq . ft. of commercial space, 250 hotel rooms, and 200 senior care units on a 41-acre site. EPD's CEQA approach for the Specific Plan involved preparation of a Supplemental Program EIR to the Final Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Santa Ana General Plan Update (GPU EIR), which was certified by the City Council in April 2022. EPD coordinated the ALUC submittal for the project, attended the ALUC hearing on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, and assisted the City in preparing the City Council overrule of the ALUC finding of inconsistency. Contact Information: Ali Pezeshkpour, Planning Manager, (714) 647-5882, APezeshkpour@santa-ana.org SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (SOCCCD) Project Name: Districtwide On-Call CEQA and Environmental Consulting Services (2014-Present) Project Description: EPD has been providing on-call CEQA, technical, and policy planning services to the South Orange County Community College District since 2014. We assist the District with permitting and entitlement issues as projects are considered and implemented for General Service Projects at ATEP, Saddleback College, and Irvine Valley College. EPD reviews plans and prepares preliminary plans for proposed projects at each of the three college campuses, assists the District in Master Planning efforts, and assists the District with interpreting and incorporating design measures that are applicable to the campuse s. EPD also prov ides the typical administrative CEQA work for projects District-wide, such as assisting the Di strict w ith administrative CEQA determinations regarding whether certain projects are covered by previously adopted CEQA documents and the preparation of appropriate CEQA documentation that takes full advantage of tiering and streamlining provi sions afforded under State law. EPD also assists the District when other agencies and jurisdicti ons must be consulted and peer review s other lead agencies' project documentation on behalf of the District. Contact Information : Medhanie Ephrem, Executive Director, Facilities Planning, (949) 582-4531, MEphrem@socccd.edu CITY OF MENIFEE -Professional On-call Environmental and Planning Con sulting Services for the City of Menifee, 2022-2026 Project Description: EPD was added to the City of Menifee's list of consultants qualifie d to prov ide Professional On-Call Environm e ntal and Planning Consulting Service s in 2022 and received a Master Agreement to provid e Profess ional On -call Environmental and Planning Consulting Services in 2023 . EPD has been awarded five project s under our on-call agreement, EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 19 of 20 263 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- including the preparation of an IS/MND and Technical Studies for a 15183 Exemption for the Menifee 27 residentia l project {2025); an EIR and Technical Studies for the Menifee Ares Warehouse on Murrieta {2022); and CEQA/NEPA compliance services for the development of Quail Valley Park, funded through the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Grants and Local Services. Contact Information: Ryan Fowler, Principal Planner, {951) 723-3740, rfowler@cityofmenifee.us EPD Solutions, Inc. Page 20 of 20 264 E I p I D SOLUTl □NS,INC WHE [ cxPEIIENCE Am PASSION MEET ----------------- STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES TABLE 1-RELEVANT PROJECTS PROJECT LOCATION THREE CONCURRENT RHNA Tust in, CA IMPLEMENTATION EIRS (MARKETPLACE REZONE, ENDERLE CENTER REZONE, TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) CITY OF IRVINE -ON-CALL PROGRAM Irvine, CA MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TRAFFIC STUDIES PALM/GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN Huntington AMENDMENT -TRANSPORTATION & Beach, CA VMT ANALYSIS; COMPREHENSIVE PEER REVIEW SERVICES MAGNOLIA TANK FARM SPECIFIC PLAN Huntington PROGRAM EIR -CEQA & ENTITLEMENT Beach, CA SUPPORT; AIR QUALITY & GHG PEER REVIEW EPD Solutions, Inc. CEQA DOCUMENT/ SERVICE YEAR(S) RELEVANCE TO HUNTINGTON BEACH ON-CALL SCOPE 2 El Rs+ 1 Supplemental EIR; 2023- Technical Studies; Responses 2025 to Comments; Find ings; Hearings Peer Review of CEQA 2024- Documents and Technical 2029 Studies (15183 Consistency Anal yses, Addenda, etc.); On-Call CEQA Ser vices and Traffic An alysis Services Dem onstrates EPD's ability to manage multiple complex CEQA assignments simultan eously under aggressive schedules and provide a broad array of technica l services addressing VMT/t ra ffic, ai r quality/GHG, noise, and cu ltural resources. Key Staff: Konnie Dobreva (Principal in Charge); Meaghan Macias (Traffic); Alex Garber (Air Quality/GHG/HRA), Terrance Smalls (QA/QC) Demonstrates EPD's abilit y to expedite peer review efforts for multiple projects si mult aneously and function as an extension of City staff to provide CEQA defensibility assurance. Key Staff: Konnie Dobreva (Principal in Charge); Terrance Smalls (Project Manager); Meaghan Macias (Traffic); Alex Garber (Air Quality/GHG/HRA) ----------- Traffic Impact Analysis; SB 743-compliant VMT Analysis; Trip Cap Calculations; Circulation Planning Support 2024- 2025 Demonstrates EPD's direct Huntington Beach experience and our capacity to support large, po licy-level projects requiring defensible CEQA and traffic/VMT analysis and coordination within the PCH co rridor context. _____ K_e_:_y Staff: Meaghan Macias (Traffic); Alex Garber (QA/QC) CEQA Compliance Support; Management and Coordination; Responses to Comments; Hearings; Coasta l Commission Processing Support; Peer 2016- 2020 Demonstrates EP D's direct Huntington Beach experience and our capacity to support comp lex, high-profile coasta l development projects that receive heigh t ened public and regulatory scrutiny. Demonstrates a p roven track record of working collabo ratively alongside Cit y Staff, as we worked close ly with City staff and their EIR prepa rer to review and stren~then the EIR and response to STATEMENT OF QUALI FICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 265 E I p I D S □LUTl □NS,INC WHERE EIPERIENCE A ll PASSION 14EET ----------------- PROJECT HOLLY TRIANGLE TOWN HOMES 19026 GOLDENWEST STREET COMMERCIAL PROJECT ----- HUNTINGTON CLUB REMODEL PROJECT ---- SNUG HARBOR SURF PARK (COASTAL PROJECT) --- CITY OF MENIFEE -ON CALL ENVIRON ME AND PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES EPD Solutions, Inc. LOCATION Huntington Beach, CA CEQA DOCUMENT/ SERVICE YEAR(S) RELEVANCE TO HUNTINGTON BEACH ON-CALL SCOPE Review of Air Quality and GHG Technical Analysis Addendum to Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan EIR; Peer Review of Supporting Technical Studies 2022 -- comments. Konnie Dobreva (Project Manager, Peer Reviewer) Meaghan Macias (Traffic Pee r Review) Demonstrates EPD's direct experience providing CEQA compliance services for a constrained residential infill project in Huntington Beach that required str eamlined documentation and technical studies. Key Staff: Kennie Dobreva (Principal in Charge); Meaghan Tr ueman (Project Manager); Meaghan Macias (Traffic); ________________ A_lex Garber (Air Qual ity/GHG) Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach,CA Newport Beach, CA - Menifee, CA Addendum No. 2 to Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan EIR; AQ/GHG/Energy Analysis; Peer Review of Supporting Technical Studies Class 32 Infill CEQA Exemption; Air Quality Analysis; Peer Review of Supporting Studies EIR; Peer Review of Technical Studies; Coastal Setting Considerations 2025 2026 2024- 2025 Demonstrates EPD's direct experience supporting efficient CEQA stream lining and expedited preparat ion of a defensible document for a high priority project in Huntington Beach. Key Staff: Kennie Dobreva (Principa l in Cha rge); Meagan Rupard (Project Manager) Demonstrates EPD's CEQA streamlining capabilities and our team's ability to expedite services for smaller-scale development projects. Key Staff: Kennie Dobreva (Principal in Charge); Meagan Rupard (Project Manager); Alex Garber (Traffic/Air Quality/GHG) Demonstrates coastal experience and EPD's ability to manage complex, high-visibility projects with strong pub lic inter est and coastal context. ------------ IS/MNDs; EIRs; Technical Studies; CEQA/NEPA Documentation 2022- 2026 Demonstrates EPD's proven record of providing on-call CEQA/NEPA and Planning services to cities throughout southern California over long-term contracts. Illustrates EPD's abi lity to prepare CEQA and NEPA documentation to support public projects. Key Staff: Kennie Dobreva (Principal in Charge); Meaghan __________ T_rueman (Project Manager); Meaghan _l\'l_aci ~ (Traffic STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 266 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPlRIENCE AIID rASIIIDH MEET ---------------- PROJECT 1500 QUAIL STREET RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CITY OF SANTA ANA-ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL, TECHNICAL, AND PLANNING SERVICES SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT -DISTRICTWIDE ON CALL CEO.A SERVICES EPD So lutions, Inc. LOCATION Newport Beach, CA Santa Ana, CA Mission Viejo, Irvine, Tustin CEO.A DOCUMENT/ SERVICE YEAR(S) RELEVANCE TO HUNTINGTON BEACH ON-CALL SCOPE Peer Review); Alex Ga r ber (Air Quality/GHG/HRA Peer Review) CEQA St reamlining Checklist (15162 / Tiering Approach) EIR; Tech nical Studies; lnteragency Coordination On-Call CEQA, Addenda, IS/M NDs, Technica l St u dies, Tiering/Streamlining 2025-Demonstrates CEQA streamlining and tiering from Ongoing adopted program-level documents and EPD's ability to provide cost-effective on-call services. 2019- 2028 Key Staff: Konnie Dobreva (Principal i n Charge) Demonstr at es EPD's experience provid ing on-call Environ mental/Planning Services related to CEO.A and NEPA, as well as Technical Analyses and Planning Services to support City staff. Key Staff: Konnie Dobreva (Principal in Ch arge); Meaghan Macias (Traffic); Alex Gar ber (Air Quality/GHG/HRA), Terr ance Sma lls (QA/QC); Meaghan Truema n Project Manager) 2016-Demonstrates long-term on-call performance and EPD's Ongoi ng role as a trust ed provider of se rvices over a t en-year period. Demonstrates co nsiste ncy project performance and high level of t rust in EPD's team, providing CEQA determinations and interagency support across m ultiple campuses and cities. Key Staff: Konnie Dobreva (Principal in Cha rge); Meaghan Trueman (Project Manager ); Meaghan Macias (Traffic); Alex Garber (Air Qual ity/GHG) STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 267 E I p I D SDLUTIDNS,INC WffERJ: EXPERIENCE AIID PA9S O MFtT -------------- TABLE 2 -KEY PERSONNEL RESUME SUMMARIES Team Member I Role/ Education Konnie Dobreva, JD Principal in Charge Juris Doctor, Pepperdine University, Caruso School of Law; BA in Environmental Analysis & Design, cum laude (Minor: Urban & Regional Planning), University of California, Irvine Terrance Smalls Senior CEQA Lead/ EPD So lutions, Inc. Relevant Experience & Responsibilities Konnie's more than 25 years of public and private sector planning and legal experience have made her an expert in entitlements, environmental and policy planning, a keen analyst and an effective writer of environmenta l documents. She provides senior oversight for CEQA strategy, document quality, and legal defensibility and leads and oversees the preparation of complex EIRs, IS/MNDs, Addenda, and CEQA streamlining efforts for major municipal planning and development projects. She is a frequent lecturer on CEQA for the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) Advanced CEQA Workshop and CEQA Basics Wo rkshop, which provides tra i ning to many of the area developers, agency planners and attorneys. DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE SPECIFIC PLAN AND EIR, CITY OF TUSTIN: Konnie was lead preparer of a Specific Plan and EIR and EPD's primary coordinator with the City of Tustin on the addition of 887 residential units and 300,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in Old Town Tustin. Her role i nvolved collaboration with Tustin on the focused development and coo rdination of technical studies and environmental documents and the creation of a functiona l and comprehensive Progra m EIR and su bsequent MMRP designed to foster proper mixed-use development. This proj ect requ ired community engagement through formal and ad-hoc community and business meetings, in which EPD played a key role facilitating. EPD was awarded the 2019 Award of Merit for Economic Planning and Deve lopment from the Orange Section of the American Planning Association for our work on this project. RELATED BRISTOL SPEOFIC PLAN, CllY Of SANTA ANA: Konnie oversaw the preparation of the Supplemental EI R for the Related Bristol Specific Plan, which includes development of a specific plan for a 41-acre site to allow for deve lopment of 3,750 r esidential units, 350,000 SF of commercia l space, 250 hotel rooms, and 200 senior care units. TRANSIT VILLAGES SPEC IFIC PLAN EIR AND TECHN ICAL STUDIES, CITY OF REDLANDS: Konnie was lead preparer of the EIR for the Transit Villages Specific Plan, which includes 2,400 res idential units, 265,000which includes 2,400 residential units, 265,000 sq. ft. of retail commercial, 238,000 sq. ft. of office, 220 hotel rooms, and 280,000 sq. ft. of parks and open space across approximately 1.48 square miles. Terrance is a seasoned city and urban planni ng professional with over a decade of experience dedicated to enhancing communities t hrough strategic planning and environmenta l stewardship. With a foundation in urban planning and deep expertise in environmenta l assessment and policy formulation, Terrance has guided numerous large-scale STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 268 E I p I D S □LUTl □NS,INC WlfEllf EIP AlElltt ::nr P "Stoll 'ff ----------------- Terrance Smalls Senior CEQA Lead I QA/QC Master of City Planning, San Diego State University; BA in Political Science, University of California Meaghan Truman Senior Environmental Planner EPD Solutions, Inc. projects through the com plexities of regulatory compliance whi le supporting long-te rm sustainability goals. Ter rance possesses extensive experience p reparing CEQA and NEPA documents and overseeing the full spectrum of environmental review processes. He has worked across a variety of sectors, including infrastructure, renewable energy, military facilities, and regional planning, havi ng experience as a Supervisi ng Planner for Kern County and a Commu nity Plans Liaison Officer for the Naval Fa cilities Engineering Command in San Diego prior to joining EPD. 19026 GOlOENWEST ST CO M MERCIAL PROJECT EIR ADDENDUM, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: Terrance provided se nior review and CEQA guidance for this project, for which EPD prepared an EIR Adde ndum to the Holly-Seacl iff General Plan Amendment EIR and prepared associated technical studies. The project proposed the subd ivision of a 1.33-acre site into two lots fo r development of a fuel center and ca r wash, and involved approval of a Tentative Parce l Map, General Plan Am endment, and Specific Plan Amendment . PA 51 TRAILS AND TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT, ADO EN OUM PEER REV IEW, CITY OF IRVINE : Terrance served as the lead reviewer for the City of Irvine's CEQA peer review of the Addendum t o the 2012 Subsequent Supplemental EIR for the PA 51 Trails and Transit-Oriented Development project. Acting on behalf of the City, he oversaw the review of t echnical studies i ncluding air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and lighting, ensuring consistency with CEQA requirements and the City's environmental policies. He evaluated the Addendum for proper tiering, legal adequacy, and internal consistency with the prior ce rtified EIR. Terrance also prepared detailed written comments, coordinated w ith City staff, and provided re d line revisions to strengthen the Addendum's legal defensibility unde r CEOA Gu idelines Section 15164. 1500 QUA IL STREET RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH: Terrance provided senior CEQA support for EPD's preparation of a CEQA Consistency Analysis for a residential redevelopment project under SB 330 and streamlining provisions. His work included verifyi ng project eligibility, assessing consistency with existing planning policies, and facilitating entitlement review under an infill exemption framework. Meaghan is a highly skilled environmental planner with deep expertise in CEQA co mp liance , entitlement processing, and policy planning. With a well-rounded background spanning both p ublic and private sectors, she has prepared a wide variety of environ m enta l documents including Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), Environment al Impact Reports (EIRs), CEQA exemptions, and addenda. Meaghan's project portfolio reflects her versati lity and includes business centers, residential commun ities, mixed-use developments, and transit-oriented projects, demonstrating her ability to navigate the unique environ mental and regulatory challenges of each development type . STATEMENT OF QUALI FICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 269 E I p I D SDLUTIDNS,INC 'tltlfR~ EXP RIFliCE A DP SSIQN ~EET --------------- Meaghan Truman Senior Environmental Planner Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Studies, Loyolo Marymount University Shawn Gatchel Hernandez Director of Biological Services Master of Environmental Law, UCLA (in progress); Bachelor of Arts, UC Riverside EPD Solutions, Inc. RElATED BRISTOL SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT, CITY OF SANTA ANA : Meaghan prepared and managed the CEOA documentation for the Related Bristol Specific Plan, a multi-phase mixed-use development in the City of Santa Ana . She managed preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (E IR) and peer reviewed all of the technical studies for the project. Meaghan assisted City staff in hosting the scoping meeting with approximately 100 attendees. GRISWOLD RESIIJENTIAL PROJECT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES: Meaghan supported CEOA documentation for the Griswold Residential Project, a development proposing new single-family homes in unincorporated Los Angeles County. She contributed to the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), including evaluation of potential impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, traffic, and biological resources. Meaghan worked closely with County staff and technica l consultants to ensure that the document met CEOA requ irements and aligned with the County's broader housing and land use objectives. WEU is 1S/MNIJ, CITY OF ORANGE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: Meaghan prepared the IS/MND for a City of Orange Public Works project that included the demolition and removal of existing asphalt and the construction of a new water well ("Well 28"), with a pumping station, utility building, SCE transformer, and a passive mini park on a 0.36-acre site in the Old Towne Orange Historic District. In addition to preparing the CEOA documentation , Meaghan oversaw the preparation of the noise and vibration analysis, air quality and GHG analysis; cultural and paleonto logical resources assessment; energy analysis; geotechnical eva luation; Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; trip generatio n; and well design report. Shawn has over 20 years of experience providing environmental and biological regulatory compliance services for local and regiona l development and infrastructure projects throughout California. She has successfully entitled mitigation and conservation banks throughout Southern California and is highly adept at identifyi ng effective m itigation soluti ons to address direct and indirect project impacts on biological resources. She conducts California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) analyses, jurisdictiona l delineations, hab itat assessments, and biological resources analyses and prepares regulatory permit applications, mitigation and monitoring plans, mitigation banking documents, and CEOA/NEPA compliance. Shawn maintains excellent relationships w ith State and federal resou rce agency staff and specializes in coordinating and building consensus with planning staff and regulatory agencies throughout the project entitle ment process. BOCA BLUFFS RESI DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, SAN CLEMENTE, CA: General Biological Assessment review of co mpliance w ith the San Clemente Loca l Coastal Program, and coordination with STATEMENT OF QUALI FICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 270 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE D PASSIQ ffi ---------------- Meghan Macias, TE Director of Technical Services Master of Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine; BA in Geography, University of California, Fullerton Licensed Traffic Engineer (TE 2697} EPD Sol utions, Inc. proponent and City on whether onsite habitats met the statutory definition of Enviro nmenta l ly Sensitive Habitat Areas in Section 30107.5 of the California Coastal Act. STEDMAN REVIEGETATION PROJECT, VEGETATION SAMP LING AND REVEGETATION PLAN, SAN DIEGO, CA: Vegetation sampling and subsequent preparation of a revegetation plan in compliance with the City's Landscape Regulations for a coastal sage scrub revegetation effort on private property along the La Jolla bluffs. V IA CASA ALTA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN, SAN DIEGO, CA: Prepa ration of a Long-Term Management Plan for private property to be incorporated into the City's Multi-Habitat Planning Area Preserve System and coordinated with the City and a local land trust for the funding and management of the lands in perpetuity. Additional Training: MSHCP Implementation Training for Biological Consultants, 2018; California Rapid Assessment {CRAM) Methodology, Trained Practitioner, Riverine Wetland Class Module, 2014; Wetland Delineotion Training, Wetland Training Institute, 2003; 1600 Permitting for CEQA, CDFG, 2002 Meghan leads a diverse team of analysts and engineers in delivering high-level technical support across multiple disciplines, including transportation planning, air qua l ity, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, noise, and health risk assessments. With more than 20 years of professional experience, Meghan has built a reputation for producing clear, defensible, and actionable analyses that support land development, infrastructure, and policy planning proj ects statewide. She plays a central role in aligning technical outputs with CEOA and NEPA compl ia nce requ irements, facilitating entitlement approvals, and navigating complex environmental regulatory frameworks. Meghan is trusted resource for SB 743 implementation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, having supported jurisdictions and private clients alike in adopting and applying innovative approaches to transportation impact evaluation. DEVELOPMENT Of VMT-BASED SCREENING THRESHOLDS (INCLUDING GHG-BASEO THRESHOLDS FOR VMT GUIDELINES), CITY OF REDLANDS: Meghan led the preparation of VMT-based screening thresholds, incorporating greenhouse gas emission metrics and CEOA stream lining provisions. Her analysis was used by the city to update its local CEOA guidelines in compliance with SB 743, providing a defensible framework for evaluating future development projects. TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PIAN AMENDMENT SE IR, THE MARKET PLACE EIR, AND ENDERlf CENTER EIR, CITY OF TUSTIN: Meghan acted as the lead project manager fo r a transportation impact analyses for three concurrent Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) implementing the City of Tustin's Housing Element Update: the Tustin Legacy STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 271 E I p I D 50LUTIDN5,INC WHERE UPERIENl:.E AND PASlllON E£T ----------------- Alex Garber Technical Manager BA in Environmental Science, University of California, Santa Cruz; Environmental Management Certification, University of California, Irvine EPD So lutions, Inc. Specific Plan Amendment SEIR, The Market Place EIR, and the Enderle Center EIR. Her work included detailed traffic impact analyses (TIAs), vehicle miles traveled (VMT) assessments in accordance with SB 743, and level of service (LOS) evaluations. Meghan's coordinated approach ensured consistency across the EIRs while addressing the unique transportation characteristics of each site, supporting the city's long-term housing and land use planning objectives. THE BOWERY MjXEO-USE PROJECT, CITY OF SANTA ANA: Meghan prepared a traffic study in coordi nation w ith the City of Santa Ana to accommodate the addition of 1,150 residentia l units and 80,000 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant comm ercial space. The traffic study included analysis of 57 intersections and their existing, opening year, and cumulative conditions within t he cities of Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine. Alex has more than seven years of experience in environmental and transportation planning, and five years of specialized expertise in air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), energy, and health risk assessment (HRA) ana"lysis. He has been instrumental in building and leading EPD's in-house technical practice for air quality, energy, GHG, and HRA services, expanding the firm's capabilities and elevating the quality of its CEQA and NEPA environme ntal documentation. Alex has contributed technical expertise to a wide varie t y of projects across California, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, and solar utility developments, as well as large-scale mixed-use and specific plans. SANTA ANA CHURCH REDEVELOPMENT AIR QUALITY, ENERGY, GHG IMPACT ANALYSIS, CITY OF SANTA ANA: Alex led the preparation of environmental technical studies for the redevelopment of a church property into a residential community. His work included evaluating emissions, energy usage, and GHG impacts under CEQA, coordinating closely with City staff to support streamlined project approval. 81X13Y AVE MIXED-USE PROJECT AIR QUALITY, ENERGY, AND GHG ANALYSIS, CITY OF GARDEN GROVE: Alex prepared CEQA-compliant technical studies for a proposed mixed-use development on Bixby Avenue . His analysis evaluated construction and operational emissions, energy consumption, and long-term greenhouse gas impacts, ensuring the project aligned with local sustainability objectives and regional air quality standa rds. SOUTH COAST TECHNOLOGY CENTER PEER REVIEW OF TECHNICAL STUDIES AND 15183 CEQA EXEMPTION, arv OF SANTA ANA: Alex conducted a peer review of traffic, air quality, and GHG technical studies and provided documentation su pporting CEQA Section 15183 exemption find ings. His review ensured the project's cons istency with the City's General Plan EIR, enabling use of streamlined environmental procedu res. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION -ADDITIONAL TABLES 272 273 EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULTANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billing 1. All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen ( 15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who performed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other documentation prepared by CONSULT ANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULT ANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULT ANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULT ANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 274 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 275 EXHIBIT B E I p I D SOLUTIDNS ,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ----------------- SECTION E: FEE SCHEDULE TABLES EPD SOLUTIONS, INC . Job Title Hourly Rate Environmental Planning and Compliance Vice Presiden t $370 Princi pal Planner / Sr. M anager $300 Direct or of Biological Res o urces $2 65 Biologist $145 Seni or Project Manager/ Environmental Planne r $250 Associat e Project Manager/ Envi ron mental Pl an ner 11/11 1 $200 Associate Project Manager/ Environmental Planner I $190 Assist ant Pl anner $165 Project Coordinator II $150 Project Coordinator I $135 Development and Construction Vic e Presi d ent $390 Director of Construction Management/ Sr. Di rector Project Services $350 Director of Development $275 Senior Project Manager $250 Projec t Manager II $225 Junior Project M anager/ Project M anager I $2 10 Assistant Projec t Manager II $165 Project Coord inator Ill $165 Project Coordin ator II $155 Project Coo rdinator I $135 Technical Services Direct o r of Tech nical Services $325 Technical Manager/ Tr ansport ati on Man ager $265 Transportation Engineer / Planner $200 Assistant Transportation Planner II $165 Assistant Transportatio n Planner I $150 Technical Speciali st II $175 Technical Specialist I $135 Administrative Support / Corporate President/ Principal / Expert Wit ness $400 Gr aphics and GIS Support $195 Technica l Edi tor $165 Execut ive Coordinator / Adm inistr ative Support (Office, Clerica l, Rep rographics, $150 -$195 Accounting) Note: Reim bursable p roject/task o rde r-related expenses, including appro priate out-of-pocket costs suc h as travel expenses for in-person meetings and site visits, permit fees payable to reso urce agencies, governmental fees, bluep r inting costs, de livery charges, etc., ar e generally invoiced at cost pl u s 15% excluding travel time, cons istent with City req uiremen ts. These fees and costs are not included in our rate sheet or w it h in any estimates, q uotations, or contracts. Unless otherwise negotiated, EPD's hou rly billing rates shall be subject t o an an nual escalation of 3%, ap plied on each anniversary of the Notice to Proceed. Cost File Page 1 of4 276 E I p I D S O LUTI D NS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ----------------- BFSA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2026 Schedule of Houl'ly Rate s BFSA E nvironmental Services BFSA Envirolllllental Se1v ices (BFSA), a Perellllial Envirolllllental company, is located at 140 10 Pow ay Road, Suite A , Poway, CA 92064. Our schedule of homly rates listed b elow represen ts our stn ndard charges for consulting se1v ices associ ated with archaeology, histo1y. pa leontology, Native Ame1ican consul tation , and biology. C ons ulting Ser vice s Houl'ly Rate Principal Consulta nt ................................................................................................ $ 235.00 Proj ect J\lfanager III ................................................................................................. $ 180.00 Project Manager II ................................................................................................... $ 155.00 Project Manager I .................................................................................................... $ 130.00 Project Coordinator ................................................................................................. $ 125.00 Senior Historian ....................................................................................................... $ 155.00 H istoxian .................................................................................................................. $ 115 . 00 Research Ass ist ant ..................................................................................................... $ 98.00 Seni or A rchaeologist ............................................................................................... $ 15.5.00 Project Archaeologist .............................................................................................. $ 11 5.00 Arch aeological Field Technic ian II ......................................................................... $ 105.00 Arch aeological Field Technician I ............................................................................ $ 90.50 Laboratory Supe1v isor ............................................................................................. $ 125.00 Lab oratmy Technician II ......................................................................................... $ 100.00 L ab orato1y Techuic ian I ............................................................................................ $ 90.50 Senior Paleontol ogist. .............................................................................................. $ 145.00 Paleoutologist II ...................................................................................................... $ 115.00 Paleou tologist I.. ...................................................................................................... $ 100.00 Biological Consultant .............................................................................................. $ 155.00 Field Biol ogis t ......................................................................................................... $ 155.00 F ield Biol ogi cal Techuician .................................................................................... $ 155.00 Field Supe1v isor ...................................................................................................... $ 125.00 Arch aeological/P al eoutologica l Fiel d Monitor II ................................................... $ 100.00 Archaeological/Paleonto logical Field Monitor I ...................................................... S 90.50 Native Am ericau Monitor ......................................................................................... Varies Support Se rvices GIS/GPS Mapping Se1vices. Productiou/lmplementatiou ...................................... $ 120.00 Graphics Al1ist/Draftspersou ..................................................................................... $ 85 .00 Word Processor/Editor .............................................................................................. $ 67.50 Senior E ditor ............................................................................................................ $ 100.50 Reimbursable Ite ms : Copy Charges (B/W-$0.08/copy; Color $0.90/copy): mileage (IRS Ra te); postage /delive1y charges: and any scallllllig/bindiug of doc umeu ts will be charged at the clerical suppo11 ra te. Other approved expeuses w ill be billed with rece ipt and a 10% marh1p. Per D i em: Per diem ch arges w ill coincide with fe deral allowances for th e specific projects eugaged . Cost File Page 2 of 4 277 E I p I D SOLUTI O NS,I NC WHERE EXPERIENCE ANO PASSION MEET ---------------- ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. 2026 LABOR SCHEDULE OF FEES TITLE HOURLY RATE Word Processing-Document Production ................................................................................ . $ 125 Project Accountant/Admin istrative Manager ....................................................................... .. $ 141 Drafting .................................................................................................................................... . $ 141 Staff I Engineer, Geologist, or Scientist .................................................................................. .. $ 162 Database Management/G IS .................................................................................................. .. $ 165 Staff II Engineer, Geologist, or Scientist ................................................................................. .. $ 172 Project I Engineer, Geologist, or Scientist ............................................................................... . $ 190 Project II Engineer, Geologist, o r Scientist.. ........................................................................... .. $ 203 Senior I Engineer, Geologist, or Scientist ................................................................................ . $ 255 Senior II Eng in eer, Geologist, or Scientist ............................................................................... . $ 292 Director ................................................................................................................................... .. $ 302 Certified Industrial Hygieni st .................................................................................................. .. $ 325 Principal Engineer, Geologist, or Scientist ............................................................................. .. $ 350 OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES Company Trucks ......................................................................................... $250.00 per Day Subcontractor Costs ................................................................................... 15% Markup Company-Owned Equipment Usage .......................................................... Ne xt Page Cost Fi le Page 3 of4 278 E I p I D SOLUTIDNS,INC WHERE EXPERIENCE AND PASSION MEET ---------------- 2026 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE OF FEES Company-Owned Equipment Usage PIO -MiniRAE 3000 PIO -ppbRAE 3000 4-Gas Meter -QRAE3 Xitech 1060 1-l Bag Sampler [Vacuum Box] Honeywell Piston Hand Pump [for colorimetric gas sample tubes] TSI 9515 VelociCalc Magnehelic Vacuum Gauge Dwyer Digital Manometer 0-1 inch w.c. Dwyer Digital Manometer 0-4 inch w .c. Dwyer Digital Manometer 0-20 inch w.c . Dwyer Digital Manometer 0-200 inch w .c. GilAir Plus Sample Pump GilAir 5 Sample Pump Soil Vapor Sampling Kit [Pump, Sy ringe, Magnehelic, Fittings etc.] Vapor Pin ® Sub-Slab Pin Assembly [Pin, Sleeve, Cap] Heron (200' Water Level Meter] Roux Truck Handheld GPS Unit Oakton pHTestr 30 Oakton PCTSTestr 50 Tile Probe/Slide Hammer Hand Auger Kit Dewalt Cordless Drill Rotary Hammer Drill Portab le Battery Power Generator [S00W] Portable Gas Power Generator [2200W] Sony Digital Camera [GPS/Compa ss Camera) 55 Gallon Drum 1-Liter Tedlar sample bags Sampling Disposable Materials [deionized water, gloves, tubing, etc.] Bailer [Unweighted, 1.25" diameter, 3' long) Cost File Daily Rate $125.00 $190.00 $85.00 $80.00 $21.00 $90.00 $16 .00 $53.00 $42.00 $21.00 $21.00 $53.00 $42.00 $53.00 $115.00 ea $42.00 $250.00 $360.00 $32.00 $37 .00 $27.00 $32.00 $37 .00 $70 .00 $53 .00 $84.00 $37.00 $80.00 ea $27 .00 ea $53 .00 $6 .00 ea Weekly Rate $370.00 $560.00 $240.00 $210.00 $53.00 $270.00 $37.00 $145 .00 $115.00 $53.00 $53.00 $145.00 $115.00 $145.00 $115.00 $630 .00 $955.00 $84.00 $100.00 $80.00 $84 .00 $100.00 $195 .00 $160.00 $265 .00 $100.00 $160.00 Page 4 of 4 279 fa .tv ENVIPLA -02 SANTIAGOR ACORD· CERTIFICATE O F LIABILITY INSURANC E I DATE (Mt.VDO/YYYY) '----' 3/25/2026 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND Tl-IE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED prov isions or be endorsed , If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED , subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certific ate holder In lieu of such endors ement(s). PRODUCER License# OE67768 991,U~CT David Sifuentes IOA Insurance Services FitJ8,NJo, E,t): (925) 660-3507 I rie~. No):(925) 416-7869 4301 Hacienda Dr Ste 220 IoMD'}l~ ••. Davld .S l fuentes@loausa.com Pleasanton, CA 94588-2711 INSURER/SI AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A: Continental Casualtv Company 20443 INSURED INSURER e : Hartford Casualty Insurance Company 29424 Envi ronment Planning Devel opment Solutions Inc dba EPD INSURER C: Solutions Inc 3333 Michelson Dr., Sui te 500 INSURER D : Irvine, CA 92612 INSURER E : INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER· REVISION NUM BER· TH IS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TH E POLICIES oi=· IN SURAN.CE LI STED BE LOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOT\'VITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN , THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 1,N~J;, TYPE OF INSURANCE ~.\'.,0~ S,lf.~~ POLICY NUMBER POL[\:_Y EFF POLICY EXP A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY = D CLAIMS-MADE [Kl OCCUR ------------------------ RGEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY [Kl f fc°f □ LOC OTHER: A ~TOMOBI LE LIAB ILITY _ ANYAUTO OWNED _ AUTOSONLY J5.. ~L'VH'soNLY X X B6025654530 X X B6025654530 A X UMBRELLA LIAB ~ OCCUR EXCESS LIAB n CLAIMS-MADE X X B6025663132 OED I X I RETENTION s 10,000 8 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE r,;fl N / A QFFICERiMEMeER EXCLUDED? L!.!J (Mandatory In NH) gi;~~ftfr~ ~ntOPE RATIONS beo'.v A Professional Llab. A Professional Llab. X 57WEGAC20BW X EEH591923312 X EEH591923312 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE s DAI.IAGE TO RENTED Pl>►'-l'"·" /Ea o,~.,,-., s MEO EXP /Any one oorsonl s PERSONAL & AOV INJURY s GENERAL AGGREGATE s PRODUCTS -COi.iP/OP AGG s s f.~1~~~~~~1f1NGLE LIMIT s BODILY INJURY IPer oersonl s BODILY INJURY IPer accidenl) S f;!l,?~~1rAl,IAGE s s EACH OCCURRENCE s AGGREGATE s s XI ~f~TUTE I I ~JH· E.L. EACH ACCIDENT s E.l. DISEASE -EA EI.IPLOYEE S E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT s Per Clalm Aggregate 2,000,0 00 1,000 ,000 10,000 2,000,000 4 ,000,0 0 0 4,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1 ,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/ VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Addlllonal Remarks Schedule, may be attached II more spice Is required) As re quired by Ce rtific ate Holder written cont ract or agreement, In-addition to (If applicable) the governing written contract or agree ment : (1) Commercial General Llab lllty p o licy shall Include (a) additional Insured coverage and contain (b) pri mary & n on-contributory and (c) waiver of subrogallon provis i ons for any additional insured: (2) to the extent applic able, Automobile Liablllty p olicy shall Include (a ) ad dltlona l insured cov erage and conta in (b) p r lma~, non contributory and (c) waiver o f subrogation provis ions for any additional insured ; (3) to the extent applicable, Commercial E xcess Llabllity policy s \apply on a follow-form basis, excess of comm ercia l general liability, automob ile lla b llity and employers' liablllty poJlg{\ll~w~l;}.sl!_~'ff)'ff'MMiln g f OI ~~nt with underlying Insurance; (4) t o the extent applicable, Workers Compensallon and Employers' Liability polli:\Mlf1fflHifcfuh'lea waiver of SUQ(IJ!l1t\lg~ro vlsl on; (5) Profess ional Llabllity policy s hall apply on a clalms-made basis and In clud e a waiver of subro g ati on provision . ~ ""'-' SEEATTACHEDACORD101 By: .. ~ .~ .. ..-,;-" \ CERTIFICATE HOLDER City of Huntlngon Beach 2000 Main Street ACORD 26 (2016/03) CANCELLATION Ml~M14'-._ ., • -- SHOULD ANY OF THE A~~~bWiVSl'i1T8~iP!.ft~~LED BEFORE THE EXPIRATI ON DATE THEREOF, NOTICE Will BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ~Jl,-... --\~ © 1988-2 016 ACORD CORPORATION. All r i ghts reserv e d . The ACORD naf!le and logo are registered marks of ACORD 280 AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: ENVIPLA-02 SANTIAGOR ~-----------------LO C #: 1 -------~ ACORD" ~ ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page 1 of 1 AGENCY License # 0E67768 IOA Insurance Services POLICY NUMBER SEE PAGE 1 CARRIER l :NAIC CODE SEE PAGE 1 SEEP 1 ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM 15 A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance Description of Operations/LocationsNehicles: NAMED INSURED Environment Planni'Ml Development Solutions Inc dba EPD Solutions Inc 3333 Michelson Dr., uite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 EFFECTIVE DATE: SEE PAGE 1 Additional Insureds: The City of Huntington Beach, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be specifically named and covered as additional insureds by separate attached endorsement(s) as respects liability arising out of action performed by or on behalf of the contractor, products and completed operations of the contractor, premises owned, occupied or used by the contractor, or automobiles owned, leased or borrowed by the contractor. ACORD 101 (2008/01) ® 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 281 eNA S8146932G (Ed. 10-19) BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED AND LIABILITY EXTENSION ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: I. II. BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Blanket Additional Insured Provisions A. Additional Insured -Blanket Vendors B. Miscellaneous Additional Insureds C. Additional Provisions Pertinent to Additional Insured Coveraae 1.a. Primarv -Noncontributorv Drovision 1.b. Definition of "written contract" 2. Additional Insured -Extended Coveraae Liabllnv Extension Coveraaes A. BodilV lniurv -ExDanded Definition B. Broad Knowledge of OccUl'l'ence C. Estates, Leaal ReDresentatives and SDouses D. Fellow EmDloyee First Aid E. Leaal Liabilitv -Damaae to Premises F. Personal and Advertisina lniuru -Discrimination or Humiliation G. Personal and Advertisina lniurv -Broadened Eviction H. Waiver of Subroaation -Blanket I. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED PROVISIONS A. ADDITIONAL INSURED -BLANKET VENDORS Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured any person or organization (referred to below as vendor) with whom you agreed under a "written contract' to provide insurance, but only with respect to "bodily injury' or 'property damage" arising out of 'your products" which are distributed or sold in the regular course of the vendor's business, ·subject to the following additional exclusions: 1. The insurance afforded the vendor does not apply to: a. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" for which the vendor is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement. This exclusion does not apply to liability for damages that the vendor would have in the absence of the contract or agreement; b. Any express warranty unauthorized by you; c. Any physical or chemical change in the product made intentionally by the vendor; d. Repackaging, except when unpacked solely for the purpose of inspection, demonstration, testing, or the substitution of parts under instructions from the manufacturer, and then repackaged in the original container; e. Any failure to make such inspections, adjustments, tests or servicing as the vendor has agreed to make or normally undertakes to make in the usual course of business, in connection with the distribution or sale of the products; • f. Demonstration, installation, servicing or repair operations, except such operations performed at the vendor's premises in connection with the sale of the product; g. Products which, after distribution or sale by you, have been labeled or relabeled or used as a container, part or ingredient of any other thing or substance by or for the vendor; or S8146932G (10-19) Page 1 of 7 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 282 I --= = = - SB146932G (Ed. 10-19) h. 'Bodily injury" or "property damage' arising out of the sole negligence of the vendor for its own acts or omissions or those of its employees or anyone else acting on its behalf. However, this exclusion does not apply to: (1) The exceptions contained in Subparagraphs d. or f.; or (2) Such inspections, adjustments, tests or servicing as the vendor has agreed to make or normally undertakes to make in the usual course of business, in connection with the distribution or sale of the products. 2. This insurance does not apply to any insured person or organization, from whom you have acquired such products, or any ingredient, part or container, entering into, accompanying or containing such products. 3. This provision 2. does not apply to any vendor included as an insured by an endorsement issued by us and made a part of this Policy. 4. This provision 2. does not apply if "bodily injury' or "property damage' included within the "products completed operations hazard" is excluded either by the provisions of the Policy or by endorsement. B. MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS 1. Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured any person or organization (called additional insured) described in paragraphs 3.a. through 3.j. below whom you are required to add as an additional insured on this policy under a "written contract.· 2. However, subject always to the terms and conditions of this policy, including the limits of insurance, we will not provide the additional insured with: a. A higher limit of insurance than required by such "written contract;" b. Coverage broader than required by such "written contract" and in no event greater than that described by the applicable paragraph a. through k. below; or c. Coverage for "bodily injury' or "property damage" included within the 'products-completed operations hazard.· But this paragraph c. does not apply to the extent coverage for such liability is provided by paragraph 3.j. below. Any coverage granted by this endorsement shall apply only to the extent permitted by law. 3. Only the following persons or organizations can qualify as additional insureds under this endorsement: a. Controlling Interest Any persons or organizations with a controlling interest in you but only with respect to their liability arising out of: (1) such person or organization's financial control of you; or (2) Premises such person or organization owns, maintains or controls while you lease or occupy these premises; provided that the coverage granted to such additional insureds does not apply to structural alterations, new construction or demolition operations performed by or for such additional insured. b. Co-owner of Insured Premises A co-owner of a premises co-owned by you and covered under this insurance but only with respect to the co-owners liability for "bodily injury," "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" as co owner of such premises. c. Grantor of Franchise Any person or organization that has granted a franchise to you, but only with respect to such person or organization's liability for "bodily injury," 'property damage," or "personal and advertising injury" as granter of a franchise to you. SB146932G (10-19) Page 2 of 7 copyright, CNA Atl Rights Reserved, 283 d. Lessor of Equipment SB146932G (Ed. 10-19) Any person or organization from whom you lease equipment, but only with respect to liability for 'bodily injury," "property damage" or 'personal and advertising injury" caused in whole or in part by your maintenance, operation or use of such equipment, provided that the "occurrence' giving rise to such "bodily injury" or "property damage' or the offense giving rise to such 'personal and advertising injury' takes place prior to the termination of such lease. e. Lessor of Land Any person or organization from whom you lease land, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury," 'property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of that specific part of the land leased to you, provided that the "occurrence' giving rise to such 'bodily injury" or "property damage' or the offense giving rise to such 'personal and advertising injury,• takes place prior to the termination of such lease. The insurance hereby afforded to the additional insured does not apply to structural alterations, new construction or demolition operations performed by, on behalf of or for such additional insured. f. Lessor of Premises An owner or lessor of premises leased to you, or such owner or lessor's real estate manager, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury,' 'property damage" or "personal and advertising injury' arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such part of the premises leased to you, and provided that the 'occurrence" giving rise to such 'bodily injury" or 'property damage' or the offense giving rise to such "personal and advertising injury,' takes place prior to the termination of such lease. The insurance hereby afforded to the additional insured does not apply to structural alterations, new construction or demolition operations performed by, on behalf of or for such additional insured. g. Mortgagee, Assignee or Receiver A mortgagee, assignee or receiver of premises but only with respect to such mortgagee, assignee, or receiver's liability for "bodily injury," "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a premises by you. This insurance does not apply to structural alterations, new construction or demolition operations performed by, on behalf of or for such additional insured. h. State or Political Subdivisions A state or government agency or subdivision or political subdivision that has issued a permit or authorization, but only with respect to such government agency or subdivision or political subdivision's liability for 'bodily injury,· "property damage' or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of: (1) The following hazards in connection with premises you own, rent, or control and to which this insurance applies: (a) The existence, maintenance, repair, construction, erection, or removal of advertising signs, awnings, canopies, cellar entrances, coal holes, driveways, manholes, marquees, hoistaway openings, sidewalk vaults, street banners, or decorations and similar exposures; or (b) The construction, erection, or removal of elevators; or (c) The ownership, maintenance or use of any elevators covered by this insurance; or (2) The permitted or authorized operations performed by you or on your behalf. But the coverage granted by this paragraph does not apply to: (a) "Bodily injury', "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of operations performed for the state or government agency or subdivision or political subdivision; or (b) "Bodily injury" or 'property damage" included within the "products-completed operations hazard.' With respect to this provision's requirement that additional insured status must be requested under a "written contract,' we will treat as a "written contract" any governmental permit that requires you to add the governmental entity as an additional insured. SB146932G (10-19) Page 3 of 7 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 284 i. Trade Show Event Lessor SB146932G (Ed. 10-19) With respect to your participation in a trade show event as an exhibitor, presenter or displayer, any person or organization whom you are required to include as an additional insured, but only with respect to such person or organization's liability for "bodily injury,• "property damage," or 'personal and advertising injury" caused by: a. Your acts or omissions; or b. Acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations at the trade show premises during the trade show event. j. Other Person or Organization Any person or organization who is not an additional insured under paragraphs a. through i. above. Such additional insured is an insured solely for "bodily injury," "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" for which such additional insured is liable because of your acts or omissions. The coverage granted by this paragraph does not apply to any person or organization: (1) For "bodily injury," 'property damage," or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of the rendering or failure to render any professional services; (2) For "bodily injury' or "property damage" included in the "products-completed operations hazard." But this provision (2) does not apply to such 'bodily injury" or "property damage" if: (a) It is entirely due to your negligence and specifically results from your work for the additional insured which is the subject to the 'written contract'; and (b) The 'written co.ntract• requires you to make the person or organization an additional insured for such "bodily injury" or 'property damage"; or (3) Who is afforded additional insured coverage under another endorsement attached to this policy. C. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS PERTINENT TO ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE 1. With respect only to additional insured coverage provided under paragraphs A. and B. above: a. The BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS are amended to add the following to the Condition entitled Other Insurance: This insurance is excess of all other insurance available to an additional insured whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis. However, if a "written contract" requires that this insurance be either primary or primary and noncontributing, then this insurance will be primary and non-contributory relative solely to insurance on which the additional insured is a named insured. b. Under Liability and Medical Expense Definttions, the following definition is added: 'Written contract• means a written contract or agreement that requires you to make a person or organization an additional insured on this policy, provided the contract or agreement: (1) Is currently in effect or becomes effective during the term of this policy; and (2) Was executed prior to: (a) The 'bodily injury" or 'property damage;' or (b) The offense that caused the "personal and advertising injury'; for which the additional insured seeks coverage. 2. With respect to any additional insured added by this endorsement or by any other endorsement attached to this Coverage Part, the section entitled Who Is An Insured is amended to make the following natural persons insureds. If the additional insured is: • a. An individual, then his or her spouse is an insured; SB146932G (10-19) Page 4 of 7 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 285 b. A partnership or joint venture, then its partners, members and their spouses are insureds; c. A limited liability company, then its members and managers are insureds; SB146932G (Ed. 10-19) d. An organization other than a partnership, joint venture or limited liability company, then its executive officers, directors and shareholders are insureds; or e. Any type of entity, then its employees are insureds; but only with respect to locations and operations covered by the additional insured endorsement's provisions, and only with respect to their respective roles within their organizations. Furthermore, employees of additional insureds are not insureds with respect to liability arising out of: (1) 'Bodily injury' or 'personal and advertising injury' to any fellow employee or to any natural person listed in paragraphs a. through d. above; (2) 'Property damage" to property owned, occupied or used by their employer or by any fellow employee; or (3) Providing or failing to provide professional health care services. II. LIABILITY EXTENSION COVERAGES It is understood and agreed that this endorsement amends the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form. II any other endorsement attached to this policy amends any provision also amended by this endorsement, then that other endorsement controls with respect to such provision, and the changes made by this endorsement to such provision do not apply. A. Bodily injury -Expanded Definition Under Liability and Medical Expenses Definitions, the definition of 'Bodily injury" is deleted and replaced by the following: "Bodily injury' means physical injury, sickness or disease sustained by a person, including death, humiliation, shock, mental anguish or mental injury by that person at any time which results as a consequence of the physical injury, sickness or disease. B. Broad Knowledge of Occurrence Under Businessowners Liability Conditions, the Condition entitled Duties In The Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit is amended to add the following: Paragraphs a. and b. above apply to you or to any additional insured only when such "occurrence," offense, claim or "suit" is known to: (1) You or any additional insured that is an individual; (2) Any partner, if you or an additional insured is a partnership; (3) Any manager, ii you or an additional insured is a limited liability company; (4) Any "executive officer" or insurance manager, ii you or an additional insured is a corporation; (5) Any trustee, ii you or an additional insured is a trust; or (6) Any elected or appointed official, ii you or an additional insured is a political subdivision or public entity. This paragraph applies separately to you and any additional insured. C. Estates, Legal Representatives and Spouses The estates, heirs, legal representatives and spouses of any natural person insured shall also be insured under this policy; provided, however, coverage is afforded to such estates, heirs, legal representatives and spouses only tor claims arising solely out of their capacity as such and, in the case of a spouse, where such claim seeks damages from marital common property, jointly held property, or property transferred from such natural person insured to such spouse. No coverage is provided for any act, error or omission of an estate, heir, legal representative or spouse outside the scope of such person's capacity as such, provided however that the spouse of a natural person Named Insured and the spouses of members or partners of joint venture or partnership Named Insureds are insureds with respect to such spouses' acts, errors or omissions in the conduct of the Named lnsured's business. SB146932G (10-19) Page 5 of 7 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reseived, 286 I D. Fellow Employee First Aid Coverage In 1he section entitled Who Is An Insured, paragraph 2.a.1. is amended to add the following: 88146932G (Ed. 10-19) The limitations described in subparagraphs 2.a.1.(a), (b) and (c) do not apply to your 'employees" for 'bodily injury' that results from providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation or other first aid services to a co-'employee" or 'volunteer worker' that becomes necessary while your 'employee' is performing duties in the conduct of your business. Your 'employees' are hereby insureds for such services. But the insured status conferred by this provision does not apply to 'employees' whose duties in your business are to provide professional health care services or health examinations. E. Legal Liability-Damage To Premises 1. Under B. Exclusions, 1. Applicable to Business Liability Coverage, Exclusion k. Damage To Property, is replaced by the following: k. Damage To Property 'Property damage" to: 1. Property you own, rent or occupy, including any costs or expenses incurred by you, or any other person, organization or entity, for repair, replacement, enhancement, restoration or maintenance of such property for any reason, including prevention of injury to a person or damage to another's property; 2. Premises you sell, give away or abandon, if the "property damage' arises out of any part of those premises; 3. Property loaned to you; 4. Personal property in the care, custody or control of the insured; 5. That particular part of any real property on which you or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly in your behalf are performing operations, if the 'property damage' arises out of those operations; or 6. That particular part of any property that must be restored, repaired or replaced because "your work' was incorrectly performed on it. Paragraph 2 of this exclusion does not apply if the premises are "your work' and were never occupied, rented or held for rental by you. Paragraphs 1, 3, and 4, of this exclusion do not apply to "property damage" (other than damage by fire or explosion) to premises: (1) rented to you: (2) temporarily occupied by you with the permission of the owner, or (3) to the contents of premises rented to you for a period of 7 or fewer consecutive days. A separate limit of insurance applies to Damage To Premises Rented To You as described in Section D - Liability and Medical Expenses Limits of Insurance. Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this exclusion do not apply to liability assumed under a sidetrack agreement. Paragraph 6 of this exclusion does not apply to "property damage' included in the 'products completed operations hazard.' 2. Under B. Exclusions, 1. Applicable to Business Liability Coverage, the following paragraph is added, and replaces the similar paragraph, if any, beneath paragraph (14) of the exclusion entitled Personal and Advertising Injury: Exclusions c, d, e, f, g, h, i, k, I, m, n, and o, do not apply to damage by fire to premises while rented to you or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner or to the contents of premises rented to you for a period of 7 or fewer consecutive days. A separate limit of insurance applies to this coverage as described in Section D. Liability And Medical Expenses Limits Of Insurance. 88146932G (10-19) Page 6 of 7 copyright, CNA All Rights Resetved. 287 S8146932G (Ed . 10-19) 3. The first Paragraph under item 5. Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit of the section entitled Liability And Medical Expenses Limits Of Insurance is replaced by the following: The most we will pay under Business Liability for damages because of "property damage' to any one premises , while rented to you or temporarily occup ied by you with the perm ission of the owner, including contents of such premises rented to you for a period of 7 or fewer consecutive days, is the Damage to Premises Rented to You Limit. The Damage to Premises Rented to You Limit is the greater of : a. $1 ,000,000; or b. The Damage to Premises Rented to You Limit shown in the Declarations . F. Personal and Advertising Injury-Discrimination or Humiliation 1. Under Liability and Medical Expenses Definitions, the definition of "personal and advertising injury" is amended to add the following : h. Discrim ination or humiliation that results in injury to the feel ings or reputation of a natural person, but only if such discrim ination or humiliation is: (1) Not done intentionally by or at the direction of: (a) The insured; or (b) Any "executive officer,• director, stockholder, partner, member or manager (if you are a lim ited liability company) of the insured; and (2) Not directly or indirectly related to the employment, prospective employment, past employment or termination of employment of any pe rson or person by any insured. 2. Under B. Exclusions, 1. Applicable to Business Liability Coverage, the exclusion entitled Personal and Advertising Injury is amended to add the fol lowing additional exclusions: (15)Discrimination Relating to Room, Dwelling or Premises Caused by discrimination directly or indirectly re lated to the sale, rental , lease or sub-lease or prospective sale, rental, lease or sub-lease of any room , dwelling or premises by or at the direction of any insured. (16)Employment Related Discrimination Discrimination or humiliation directly or indirectly related to the employment, prospective employment, past employment or termination of employment of any person by any insu red . (17) Fines or Penalties Fines or penalties levied or imposed by a governmental entity because of discrimination. 3. This provision (Personal and Advertising Injury -Discrimination or Humiliation) does not apply if Personal and Advertising Injury Liability is excluded either by the provisions of the Policy or by endorsement. G. Personal and Advertising Injury -Broadened Eviction Under Liability and Medical Expenses Definitions, the definition of "Personal and advertising injury• is amended to delete Paragraph c. and replace it with the following : c. The wrongfu l eviction from, wrongful entry into, or invasion of the right of private occupancy of a room dwelling or premises that a person or organizati on occupies committed by or on behalf of its owner , land lord or lessor. H. Waiver of Subrogation -Blanket We wa ive any right of recovery we may have against: a. Any person or organization with whom you have a written contract that requ ires such a wa iver. All other terms and conditions of the Policy remain unchanged . S8146932G (10-19) Page 7 of 7 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 288 Policy# B6025654530 SB-146968-A (Ed. 01/06) IMPORTANT: THIS ENDORSEMENT CONTAINS DUTIES THAT APPLY TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED IN THE EVENT OF OCCURRENCE, OFFENSE, CLAIM OR SUIT. SEE PARAGRAPH C., OF THIS ENDORSEMENT FOR THESE DUTIES. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT WITH PRODUCTS-COMPLETED OPERATIONS COVERAGE & BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION Architects, Engineers and Surveyors This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS A. WHO IS AN INSURED (Section C.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to include as an insured any person or organization whom you are required to add as an additional insured on this policy under a written contract or written agreement; but the written contract or written agreement must be: 1. Currently in effect or becoming effective during the term of this policy; and 2. Executed prior to the "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury." B. The insurance provided to the additional insured is limited as follows: 1. That person or organization is an additional insured solely for liability due to your negligence specifically resulting from "your work" for the additional insured which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement. No coverage applies to liability resulting from the sole negligence of the additional insured. 4. The insurance provided to the additional insured does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," "personal and advertising injury" arising out of an architect's, engineer's, or surveyor's rendering of or failure to render any professional services including: a. The preparing, approving, or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications by any architect, engineer or surveyor performing services on a project of which you serve as construction manager; or b. Inspection, superv,s,on, quality control, engineering or architectural services done by you on a project of which you serve as construction manager. 5. This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury," "property damage," or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of: a. The construction or demolition work while you are acting as a construction or demolition contractor. This exclusion does not apply to work done for or by you at your premises. 2. The Limits of Insurance applicable to the additional insured are those specified in the written contract or written agreement or in the Declarations of this policy, whichever is less. These Limits of Insurance are inclusive of, and not in addition to, the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. C. BUSINESSOWNERS GENERAL LIABILITY 3. The coverage provided to the additional insured within this endorsement and section titled LIABILITY AND MEDICAL EXPENSE DEFINITIONS -"Insured Contract" (Section F .9.) within the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form, does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" arising out of the "products-completed operations hazard" unless required by the written contract or written agreement. SB-146968-A (Ed. 01/06) CONDITIONS -Duties In The Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit (Section E.2.) of the Businessowners Liability Coverage Form is amended to add the following: An additional insured under this endorsement will as soon as practicable: 1. Give written notice of an occurrence or an offense to us which may result in a claim or "suit" under this insurance; Page 1 of 2 289 """"' ...... 2. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to us for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part; 3. Tender the defense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to any other insurer which also has insurance for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part;and 4. Agree to make available any other insurance which the additional insured has for a loss we cover under this Coverage Part. We have no duty to defend or indemnify an additional insured under this endorsement until we receive written notice of a claim or "suit" from the additional insured. D. OTHER INSURANCE (Section H. 2. & 3.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions are deleted and replaced with the following: 2. This insurance is excess over any other insurance naming the additional insured as an insured whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis unless a written contract or written agreement specifically requires that this insurance be either primary or primary and noncontributing to the additional insured's own coverage. This insurance is excess over any other insurance to which the additional insured has been added as an additional insured by endorsement. 3. When this insurance is excess, we will have no duty under Coverages A or B to defend the additional insured against any "suit" if any other insurer has a duty to defend the additional insured SB-146968-A (Ed. 01/06) SB-146968-A (Ed. 01/06) against that "suit" If no other insurer defends, we will undertake to do so, but we will be entitled to the additional insured's rights against all those other insurers. When this insurance is excess over other insurance, we will pay only our share of the amount of the loss, if any, that exceeds the sum of: (a) The total amount that all such other insurance would pay for the loss in the absence of this insurance; and (b) The total of all deductible and self-insured amounts under all that other insurance. We will share the remaining loss, if any, with any other insurance that is not described in this Excess Insurance provision and was not bought specifically to apply in excess of the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations of this Coverage Part. E. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (Section K.2.) of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions is deleted and replaced with the following: 2. We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization against whom you have agreed to waive such right of recovery in a written contract or agreement because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included within the "products-completed operations hazard." Page 2 of 2 290 iiiiiiii = - THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. HIRED AUTO AND NON-OWNED AUTO LIABILITY This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESSOWNERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM BUSINESSOWNERS COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS SCHEDULE Insurance is provided only with respect to those coverages for which a specific limit is shown: COVERAGE LIMIT Hired Auto Liabilitv: $ Non-owned Auto Liabilitv: $ SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) PROVISIONS A. COVERAGE With respect only to the Coverage(s) for which a limit is shown in the SCHEDULE above, the insurance provided under Coverage A.1. Business Liability for "bodily injury" and "property damage" also applies to "bodily injury" or "property damage" arising out of the maintenance or use of a: "Hired auto" used by you or your "employee" in the course of your business; and/or "Non-owned auto" used in the course of your business. Maintenance or use of a "non-owned auto" includes test driving in connection with an "auto business." With respect only to the coverage provided by this endorsement, under Coverages, coverage A.1. Business Liability is amended to: 1. Delete paragraph A.1.b.(1)(b) and replace it with the following: b. This insurance applies: (1) To "bodily injury" and "property damage" only if: (b) The "occurrence" occurs during the policy period; and 2. Delete paragraph A.1.b.(2),. B. LIMITS OF INSURANCE With respect only to the coverage provided by this endorsement, SECTION D. Liability And Medical Expenses Limits of Insurance is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: D. Limits Of Insurance 1. Regardless of the number of: a. Insureds; b. Claims made or "suits" brought; c. Persons or organizations making claims or bringing "suits"; or d. "Autos," the applicable Hired Auto Liability limit or Non-Owned Auto Liability limit shown in the Declarations is the most we will pay for damages under SECTION A. Coverages because of all "bodily injury" and "property damage" resulting from any one "occurrence" arising out of the maintenance or use of a "hired auto" or "non-owned auto." SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) Page 1 of3 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 291 C. EXCLUSIONS With respect only to the insurance provided by this endorsement: SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) 1. Under Exclusions, the paragraph entitled Applicable to Business Liability Coverage is amended to delete all exclusions except exclusions a., b., d., e., f. and i. and to add the following exclusions: This insurance does not apply to: Fellow Employee "Bodily injury" to: (1) Any fellow "employee" of the insured arising out of and in the course of employment by the insured or while performing duties related to the conduct of the insured's business; or (2) The spouse, child, parent, brother or sister of that fellow "employee" while as a consequence of Paragraph (1) above. Care, Custody or Control "Property Damage" to: (1) Property owned or being transported by, or rented or loaned to the insured; or (2) Property in the care, custody or control of the insured. D. WHO IS AN INSURED With respect only to the insurance provided by this endorsement, Who Is An Insured is replaced by the following: Each of the following is an insured under this insurance to the extent set forth below: 1. You; 2. Subject to paragraph 3.c. below, your "employee" while operating an "auto" hired or rented under a contract or agreement, with your permission, in that "employee's" name, while performing duties related to the conduct of your business. 3. Anyone else including any partner or "executive officer" of yours while using with your permission a "hired auto" or a "non-owned auto" except: a. The owner or lessee (of whom you are a sublessee) of a "hired auto" or the owner or lessee of a "non-owned auto" or any agent or "employee" of any such owner or lessee; b. Your "employee" if the covered "auto" is owned by that "employee" or a member of his or her household; c, Your "employee" if the covered "auto" is leased, hired or rented by him or her or a member of his or her household under a lease or rental agreement for a period of 180 days or more; d. Any partner or "executive officer" with respect to any "auto" owned by such partner or officer or a member of his or her household; e. Any partner or "executive officer" with respect to any "auto" leased or rented to such partner or officer or a member of his or her household under a lease or rental agreement for a period of 180 days or more; f. Any person while employed in or otherwise engaged in duties in connection with an "auto business," other than an "auto business" you operate; g. Anyone other than your "employees," partners, a lessee or borrower or any of their "employees," while moving property to or from a "hired auto" or a "non-owned auto"; or 4. Any other person or organization, but only with respect to their liability because of acts or omissions of an insured under 1., 2. or 3. above. E. AMENDED DEFINITION The Definition of "insured contract" in Section F -Definitions isimended by the addition of the following exceptions to paragraph f.: SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) Page 2 of 3 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 292 -!!!!!!!!!! --- Paragraph f. does not include that part of any contract or agreement: SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) That pertains to the loan, lease or rental of an "auto" to you or any of your "employees," if the "auto" is loaned, leased or rented with a driver; or That holds a person or organization engaged in the business of transporting property by "auto" for hire harmless for your use of a covered "auto" over a route or territory that person or organization is authorized to serve by public authority. F. ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS Section F. Definitions is amended by the addition of the following definitions: a. "Auto Business" means the business or occupation of selling, repairing, servicing, storing or parking "autos." b. "Hired auto" means any "auto" you or your "employee" lease, hire, rent or borrow in the course of your business. This does not include: i. Any "auto" you lease, hire or rent under a lease or rental agreement for a period of 180 days or more, or ii. Any "auto" you lease, hire, rent or borrow from any of your "employees," partners, stockholders, or members of their households. c. "Non-owned auto" means any "autos" you do not own, lease, hire, rent or borrow that are being used in the course and scope of your business at the time of the "occurrence." This includes "autos" owned by your "employees" or partners or members of their households but only while being used in the course and scope of your business at the time of the "occurrence." If you are a sole proprietor, "non-owned auto" means any "autos" you do not own, lease, hire, rent or borrow that are being used in the course and scope of your business or personal affairs at the time of the "occurrence." G. With respect only to the operation of a "hired auto" or "non-owned auto," Paragraph H, of the Businessowners Common Policy Conditions is deleted and replaced with the following: H. Other Insurance 1. Except for any liability assumed under an "insured contract" the insurance provided by this Coverage Form is excess over any other collectible insurance. However, if your business is the selling, servicing, repairing, parking or storage of "autos," the insurance provided by this endorsement is primary when covered "bodily injury" or "property damage" arises out of the operation of a customer's "auto" by you or your "employee." 2. When this Coverage Form and any other Coverage Form or policy covers on the same basis, either excess or primary, we will pay only our share. Our share is the proportion that the Limit of Insurance of our Coverage Form bears to the total of the limits of all the Coverage Forms and policies covering on the same basis. All other terms and conditions of the Policy remain unchanged. SB146902G (Ed. 6-16) Page 3 of3 Copyright, CNA All Rights Reserved. 293 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT Policy Number: 57 WEG AC20BW Endorsement Number: 001 Effective Date: 09/30/25 Effective hour is the same as stated on the Information Page of the policy. Named Insured and Address: Environment Planning Development Solutions Inc. 3333 Michelson Dr., Suite 500 Irvine CA 92612 ~ We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE Any person or organization for whom you are required by contract or agreement to obtain this waiver from us. Endorsement is not applicable in KY, NH, NJ or for any MO construction risk Form WC 00 03 13 Printed in U.S.A. Process Date: 10/03/25 Countersigned by ----------~~~~~--~~ Authorized Representative Policy Expiration Date: 09/30/26 294 CNA Professional Liabil ity and Poll ution Inc ident Liability Insurance Policy 4. fully cooperate with the Insurer or the Insurer's designee in the defense of a claim , including but not limited to assisting the Insurer in: the conduct of suits or other proceedi ngs , settlement negotiations, and the enforcement of any right of contribution or indemnity against another who may be liable to the Insured. The Insured shall attend hearings and trials and assist in securing evidence and obtaining the attendance of witnesses; 5. refuse , except solely at the lnsured's own cost, to voluntarily make any payment , admit liability, assume any obligation , or incur any expense, without the Insurer's prior written approval ; and 6. pay the deductible amount when due. After the Insured reports a circumstance or a claim is made and the Insured has the right under any contract to either reject or demand arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution process, the Insured shall only do so with the Insurer's prior written consent. C . The lnsured's Rights and Duties in the Event of a Circumstance If the Insured reports a circumstance for which there may be coverage under this Policy, and the Insured gives the Insurer written notice containing as much detail as the Insured can reasonabl y provide regarding: 1. what happened and the professional services or acti v ities the Insured performed ; 2. the nature of any possible injury or damages ; and 3. how and when the Insured first became aware of such circumstance, then any claim or related claims that subsequently may be made against the Insured arising out of such circumstance shall be deemed to have been made on the date the Insurer recei ved writte n notice of the circumstance . The Insured will cooperate with the Insurer in addressing the circumstance , and refuse , except solel y at the lnsured's own cost, to voluntarily make any payment , admit liability, assume any obligation , or incur any ex pense without the Insurer's prior written approval. D. Subrogation If any Insured has rights to recover amounts from another , those rights are transferred to the Insurer to the extent of the Insurer's payment. The Insured must do ev erything necessary to secure these r ights and must do nothing after a claim is made to jeopardize them . T he Insurer here by waives subrogation rights against any person or organization to the extent that the Named Insured has , prior to a wrongful act or circumstance , entered into a writte n agreement to waiv e such rights . E. Premium All premium charges under this Policy will be computed according to the rules, rates and rating plans that apply at the effective date of the current policy term. F. Examination and Audit The Insured agrees to c;1llow the Insurer to examine and audit the lnsured 's finan c ial books and records that relate to this insurance . The Insurer may do this at any time during the policy term o r an y exten sion s , and up to three years after the end of the policy term. G. Legal Action Limitation 1. The Insured agrees not to bring any legal action again st the Insurer concerning this Policy unless the Insured has fully complied with all the provisions of this Policy . 2. If, afte r th e final adjudication or settlement of a claim, there is an y dispute concern ing tort allegations aga inst the Insurer regarding the handling or settlement of any claim, the Insured and the Insurer agree to submit su ch dispute to any form of alternative dispute resolution acceptable to both Form No : CNA79034XX (11-20 22) Policy Page 1 3 o f 1 7 Underwriting Company: Cont inenta l Casualty Company 151 North Franklin Street , Chicago, IL 60606 \9 l,Opynght L,IW\ All K 1ghts K eservea. Po licy No: EE H5 91923312 Policy Effective Date : 09/30/2 024 Policy P age: 1 5 o f 2 6 295 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CEQA SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on-call environmental CEQA services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSUL TANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULT ANT hereby designates Richard Beck who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULT ANT in the performance of this Agreement. 26-17869/408344 I of 11 296 3. TERM· TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSUL TANT are to commence on April 5, 2026 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than one year from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in Exhibit "A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSUL TANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSULT ANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULT ANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY reqmres additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSUL TANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit "B." 26-17869/408344 2 of 11 297 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULT ANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS A. CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULT ANT's ( or CONSULT ANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent (or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULTANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULT ANT. B. To the extent that CONSUL TANT performs "Design Professional Services" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.8, then the following Hold Haimless provision applies in place of subsection A above: 26-17869/408344 3 of 11 298 "CONSULT ANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) to the extent that the claims against CONSUL TANT arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULT ANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to CONSULTANT exceed CONSULTANT's propmiionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more other defendants to the claims and/or litigation is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, CONSULT ANT shall meet and confer with CITY and other defendants regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in California Civil Code Section 2782.8. C. Regardless of whether subparagraph A or B applies, CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULTANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSUL TANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance 26-1 7869/408344 4 of 11 299 policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSUL TANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSUL TANT will make eve1y effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULT ANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSULT ANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY' s election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSUL TANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: 26-17869/408344 A. B. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; state that the policy is currently in force; and 5 of 11 300 C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSUL TANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULT ANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSUL TANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULT ANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULT ANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULT ANT as provided herein. In the 26-17869/408344 6 of 11 301 event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSUL TANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULT ANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set fmih in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULT ANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSUL TANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail-return receipt requested: 26-17869/408344 7 of 11 302 TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Director of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT TO CONSUL TANT: Michael Balcer International, Inc. ATTN: Richard Beck 5 Hutton Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 When CITY's consent/approval 1s required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or 26-17869/408344 8 of 11 303 neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation conh·ary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any paiiy who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particulai·, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSUL TANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSUL TANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 26-I 7869/408344 9 of 11 304 24. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGN A TORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective pmties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the oppmiunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warrm1ties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that pmty or anyone acting on that pmty's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set fo1ih in this 26-17869/408344 IO of 11 305 Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. 26-17869/408344 11 of 11 306 CONSULT ANT, MICHAEL BAKER INTERN A TlONAL, INC .~ By: ~L 712'.'½2\ HK print name ITS: (c ircle 011 e) Chairman/Presiden~res id~ I print name IT • (circle 0 11e) Secretary/C hi e f Finan cial Office Secrelar -Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Ca l ifornia Mayor City Clerk INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Community Development REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: p~~ ft,-City Attorney 26-1 7869/408344 12 o f 11 307 CONSUL TANT, MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC . By: ______________ _ print n ame ITS: {circle one) Chairman/President/Vice President AND By: ____________ _ print name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Ch ief Financial Officer/ Asst. Secretary -Treasu rer CITY OF HUNTINGTO N BE ACH , a municipal corporation of the State of California Mayor City C lerk ND APPROVED: (/' ~ Ii~' - Director of Community Development REVIEWED AN D APPROVED : City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: p~~ fc-City Attorney 26-17869/408344 12 of 11 308 EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) CONSULT ANT shall provide consulting services on an "as-needed" basis for projects to be determined during the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY shall issue task orders based upon scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to City for its review and approval B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Furnish scope of work request for each project 2. Prepare associated reimbursement agreements and collect developer payments in a timely manner in conjunction with projects assigned. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by City. EXHIBIT A 309 EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES FEBRUARY 12, 2026 310 CITY OF HUNTI NGTO N BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALI FICATIONS FOR ON -CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A. VENDOR APPLICATION FORM AND COVER LETTER ............................................................... 2 B. BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE ............................................................................................. 6 C. STAFFING ................................................................................................................................... 11 D. QUALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES ..................................................................................... 15 E. FEE SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................................... 19 MICHAEL BAKER I NTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 1 OF 19 311 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-C ALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES A. VENDOR APPLICATION FORM AND COVER LETTER February 12, 2026 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Community Development Departmen t 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Legal Name & Address : Michael Baker International, Inc. 500 Grant Street, Suite 5400 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Local Office: Subject: Statement of Qualifications -On-Call Environmental (CEQA) Consulting Services 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Dear Members of the Selection Committee: Authorized to Sign : Michael Baker International , Inc. (Michael Baker) is pleased to respond to the City of Huntington Beach 's Request for Qualifications to provide on-call environmental (CEQA) consulting services. We have assembled a team that can provide a range of tasks to service the City, including but not limited to, preliminary review of projects for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) purposes; preparation of CEQA documents and technical studies; review of CEQA/NEPA documents prepared by neighboring jurisdictions/agenices; peer review of CEQA documents; participation in required consultation; cond ucting scoping meetings; and Richard Beck, Office Executive 949.855.3687 rbeck@mbakerintl.com Contract Manager: Alan Ashimine 949.855.3687 aashimine@mbakerintl.com participating in public meetings and hearings. Michael Baker is a full-service consulting firm providing land use planning , environmental compliance, and engineering services for over 85 years. We have a fu ll complement of environmental planners and environmental specialists (e.g., air quality/greenhouse gas/noise experts, archaeologists, biologists) capable of undertaking any level of CEQA/NEPA environmental review and analysis. Michael Baker has assisted Huntington Beach with preparation of CEQA documentation for a range of highly complex and co ntroversial projects over the past 25 years. The benefit of the Michael Baker Team is our ability to provide all services in house, without the need for any subconsultants. However, we can work with any specialists requested by the City. PROJECT TEAM COMMITMENT AND AVAILABILITY The designated T earn will be led by Mr. Alan Ashimine, serving as Contract Manager. This leadership team has worked together for 1 O+ years and have successfully partnered to complete over 100+ projects in jurisdictions throughout California . This provides the City with a continuity of services and a project leadersh ip team with excellent communication and trust. The leadership team, along with the rest of our project team, are available to initiate the work immediately and will remain dedicated to the project during the entire process. EXTENSIVE ON-CALL EXPERIENCE Michael Baker has experience providing on-call environmental services to local cities and counties including the cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Carson, Costa Mesa, Fontana, Huntington Beach, Laguna Niguel, Lancaster, Long Beach, Orange, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, San Gabriel, Santa Ana, and Ventura, and the counties of Orange, and Riverside, among others. Michael Baker is also a recognized leader in the provision of planning staffing services to a diverse range of cities and counties and has provided on-call current plann ing staffing services to nearly 100 public agencies throughout California. MI CHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 2 OF 19 312 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFIC ATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES LEGALLY DEFENSIBLE DOCUMENTATION Preparation of legally defensible documents is imperative in today's environment. Throughout Michael Baker's 40+ years of preparing environmental and regulatory documentation, we have attained extensive experience in writing accurate, legally defensible environmental documents for all types of challenging and controversial projects. Michael Baker acknowledges Addendum 1 dated 2/2/26. MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CAPABILITIES Michael Baker possesses a unique in-house network of professionals in disciplines including Planning/Environmental Services, Publi c Engagement/Facilitation, Transportation/Traffic Engineering , Civil Engineering (including Grading, Public Works, Water/Wastewater, Stormwater/Water Quality, and Hydrology/Drainage), Mechanical/ Electrical/Energy Engineering, Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) and GIS Services, Mapping, Surveying, Aerial Photogrammetry and Media Services, which results in a coordinated and efficient effort, with full-service consulting capabilities available to the City of Huntington Beach within one firm . Michael Baker has assisted Huntington Beach with preparation of CEQA documentation for a range of highly complex and controversial projects over the past 25 years. We are unique ly qualified to work in your City, since we are currently working in many coastal cities in southern California and have a great relationship working with the California Coastal Commission. The designated Project Team will be led by Mr. Alan Ashimine serving as Contract Manager and will be based out of our Orange County office at 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500, Santa Ana, CA 92707. Richard Beck, the undersigned , is authorized to make legally binding commitments for the firm. The provided consu lta nt fees /hourly rat es will be valid for a period of 180 days. Michael Baker has carefully reviewed the RFQ and the sample agreement included and can agree to use of this agreement. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ashimine at 949.855.5710 I aashimine@mbakerintl.com , should you have any questions or require additiona l information. Regards, ~-W- Alan Ashimine Associate Vice President Richard Beck Office Executive MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 3 OF 19 313 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES TYPE OF APPLICANT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM □NEW 0 CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation : Michael Baker International, Inc. Contact Person for Agreement: Richard Beck, Office Executive (Authorized Signer) Corporate Mailing Address: 5 Hutton Centre Drive , Suite 500 C ity, State and Zip Code: Santa Ana, CA 92707 E-Mail Address: rbeck@mbakerintl.com Phone: 949.855.3687 Fax: 949.472.8373 Co ntact Person for Proposals: _A_la_n_A_s_h_i_m_in_e _______________ _ Titl e: Contract Manager E-Mail Address: aashimine@mbakerintl.com Business Tel ephone : 949 -588 -571 O Year Business was Established: 1940 Business Fax: 949 .472 •8373 ------ ls your business : (check one) 0 NON PROFIT CORPORATION 0 FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is you r business: (check one) 0 CO RPORATION 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 PARTNERSHTP 0 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHlP 0 SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP 0 UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION I of2 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATI ONAL ■ PAGE 4 OF 19 314 CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFI CATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONS ULTING SERVICES Names & T itles of Corporate Board Mem bers (A lso list Names & T itl es o f persons with written authoriz at ion/resolut ion to sign contracts) Names Title Pho ne Thomas Campbell Chairman 412.269.6300 Brian Lutes Prosldonl a Cl\el Exocu\\,o Officer 412.269.6300 Chris Peters EVP & Chief Opomllng Otticer 949.472.3505 Stephanie Long EVP & Chief Financial OHicor 412.269.6300 Tanya Currie EV'P & CNrtl ttumaf\ Re,;ourCIS Qftw 412.269.6300 Federa l Tax Ide ntificat ion Num be r: 25-1228638 C ity of Huntington Beach Busi ness License Numbe r: A296516 (If none, yo u must obta in a Hunting ton Beac h Business License upon award of contract.) C ity o f Huntington Beach Business Lice ns e Expiration Date: City of H 11 11ti11gton R ea ch f au,1nH1 ,,..,m~ / s«rvk~ Adclt~u N >CttA.f.L !1,,.1.H lt.l(IV,1J10ll~l l 'IC !o-., I torpQt ,,,.,,, ~' >tlJ &.l•ll1"4 ""U~tl llt(" l lt"'1<• fYN ,PkuFUl.tO'l~L $£RV fS Hu,me-<-• f ktn,-1• Pon I'll PU9uc vmv 5 .31.26 Cfh,wwO.t• ullno,~ EAj>lr•tloft !Mt• 'JLlOl6 llit\W(~t IO!llYI~~-.. , 11111•,r»A ... O;Y.1(!,llOM• ,T:~• l•Tkt rt,· .. ,ow, M !uat.> .<. ,v <\ i;.:•. tr,>f;Sf{AA~tl •fNCN ,"1 H EC •j 01 Pf"O·E fH: l'PlAAlh'', II.' 1f 2 of2 MICHAEL BAKER I NTERNAT IONAL ■ PAGE 5 OF 19 315 CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES 8. BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE BACKGROUND Founded in 1940 and celebrating over 85 years of supporting our local communities , Michael Baker is a leader in environmental, planning, engineering, architecture, consulting, and technical/professional services with a local focus and global expertise. Michael Baker has a staff of more than 3,500 professionals with in-house expertise in disciplines that include Environmental Analysis, Planning, GIS Services, Surveying , Aerial Photogrammetry, Mapping , Real Estate Assessments, Transportationffraffic Engineering, Civil Engineering (including Grading , Public Works, Water/Wastewater, Hydrology), Mechanical/Electrical/Energy Services, CADD, and Media Services. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AESTHETICS l BIOLOGICAL ' ROADWAY CULTURAL RESOURCES • RESOURCES _01~ ~ ee ~ IA ~"c) e ~~ J I -··------ UTILITIES CEQA / NEPA DOCUMENTS ■-■ r .,.,, cj .) ~ ~ ~~ • ~a5) GREENHOUSE TRIP I GAS POPULATION AIR QUALITY HAZMAT REDUCTION As a leader in the environmental consulting field, Michael Baker offers an extensive array of services associated with environmental compliance and documentation. Michael Baker provides evaluations for the full range of environmental effects for all types of projects, including CEQA and NEPA documentation, air quality and health risk assessments, greenhouse gas analyses, rioise studies, regulatory agency permitting, cultural and biological resources, visual assessments and photo simulations, transportation studies, drainage/water quality assessments, community/ socioeconomic analyses, and mitigation/monitoring compliance services. Our environmental compliance managers have a broad range of project experience in urban communities and have worked on numerous complex projects requiring technical expertise, creative solutions, and development of effective and workable mitigation. We can confidently say that our environmental expertise makes us primed to assist with any on-call request needed by the City. AS-NEEDED AND ON-CALL SERVICES Michael Baker takes great pride in our long-standing history of providing both as needed and "extension of staff' services for public sector clients. Michael Baker has worked with Huntington Beach on controversial projects over the past 25 years. In southern California, we have a long history of working in coastal cities including current services to Costa Mesa, Long Beach , Dana Point, San Clemente, and El Segundo, as well as past services to Seal Beach and Ventura, among others. Michael Baker also has recent project experience working on coastal CEQA documents proximate to Huntington Beach, such as the recently adopted Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement Project EIR in Newport Beach, Doheny Village Zoning District Update and Victoria Boulevard Apartments EIRs in Dana Point, and One Metro West EIR in Costa Mesa all within the past few years . With this experience, we have a long-established working relationship with the Coastal Commission and other agencies to address challenging issues that may arise for Huntington Beach , such as visual resource analysis, land use/recreation and visitor-serving use considerations , and both terrestrial-and marine-biological resource analyses. Our staff is accustomed to meeting demanding project schedules by using our collective resources from skilled staff throughout the region. As necessary, we can tap into our full 160 planners and 450 engineers, architects, and other professionals to deliver the highest quality of service and on-time performance for our clients. MI CHAEL BAKER I NTERNATI ONAL ■ PAG E 6 OF 19 316 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONS ULTING SERVICES CEQA AND NEPA DOCUMENTS The Michael Baker Environmental staff have provided CEQA and NEPA documentation and environmental technical studies for a diverse range of capital improvement and development projects, as well as regulatory/policy documents such as General Plans and zoning ordinances. Our environmental documents are not only legally defensible and user friendly but are supported by technical professionals with expertise in hydrology, water quality, transportation, water/wastewater, landscape architecture, urban design, policy planning , structural design, civil engineering, GIS, mapping, and surveying. Michael Baker produces environmental documents that are sensitive to agency and public concerns regarding issues such as natural and man-made resource protection , comm unity impacts , and other issues associated with cost and feasibility of implementing mitigation measures. Our team has a thorough understanding of CEQA, NEPA, and the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, National Historic Preservation Act and other local, state, and federal regulations. FAMILIAR/TY WITH TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN HUNTINGTON BEACH As a coastal city, projects for consideration are subject to coastal planning and development provisions as they relate to the Coastal Act of 1976, and more recently resiliency planning for sea level rise . The City's Loca l Coastal Program (LCP) is identified as the Coastal Element of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan (General Plan) and was certified in 2001 (amended in 2011 ). The LCP helps streamline the Coastal Development Permit review process for projects within the City's Coastal Zone. As with many coastal cities, Huntington Beach needs to balance the potential economic benefits of projects with required protection of coasta l re sou rces (e.g., public access, land and marine habitat, and scenic and visual qualities) under the General Plan and Coastal Act. Michael Baker has extensive experience MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 7 OF 19 317 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ~ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES working on projects within southern California coastal cities and within the Coastal Zone, including the cities of Dana Point, Long Beach, Newport Beach, San Clemente, Seal Beach, Carlsbad, and San Diego. The General Plan was recently updated at the end of 2017 and involved a robust community engagement effort. Out of that came several guiding principles supported by the City and community, including economic vitality for local businesses; infrastructure improvement funding; preservation of the City's Surf City culture and visual character; redevelopment and revitalization of the City's older commercial and industrial areas; conserving and enhancing natural resources, cultural arts, and recreational amenities; and expanding community services and programs. The General Plan also identifies key areas within Huntington Beach for conservation, preservation, and transformation. Transformation areas predominantly include the industrial areas of the City, such as the Northwest Industrial Area and the Gothard Corridor. In addition, the City has 16 adopted Specific Plans, of which almost half are located in the Coastal Zone. The Michael Baker team knows how to work with you through the environmental review process, including providing consistency and compliance with the visions and standards of the General Plan and Specific Plans adopted for the purpose of reducing environmental impacts. Michael Baker has assisted Huntington Beach with preparation of CEQA documentation for a range of highly complex and controversial projects over the past 25 years. These projects include the Edison Park Reconfiguration and Improvements Project, Seawater Desalination (Poseidon) Project at Huntington Beach EIR, Remediation and Reuse of the Former Gun Range within Huntington Central Park EIR; Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Plan EIR, and Brookhurst Street/Adams Avenue Intersection Improvements EIR. Each of these EIRs were supported by a range of highly detailed technical studies to support the conclusions reached in the environmental document. UNIQUELY RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS As a full-service, multi-disciplinary consulting firm, Michael Baker possesses many characteristics that make it uniquely qualified to provide on-call environmental services to the City. Several of the key, unique characteristics that set the Michael Baker Team apart from its competitors are described below. • Full Service CEQAINEPA Support Capabilities. Michael Baker possesses a full range of CE QA/NEPA support services ready for the City's on-call projects. All under a single roof, Michael Baker is capable of preparing technical studies, peer reviews, regulatory permitting, and can provide engineering/planning assistance if necessary to support any CE, ND, MND, or EIR under CEQA or a CE, EA or EIS under NEPA. • Ability to React Quickly to On-Call Requests and Offer Competitive Fees. Michael Baker has assembled an exceptional team of professionals with the capabilities to react to the diverse range of projects that could arise from the City's on-call contract. Not only can the Michael Baker Team provide defensible, technically accurate CEQA/NEPA documentation, but we can also mobilize quickly and cost-efficiently for the following reasons: 1) Michael Baker possesses specialists necessary for any type of project small or large; and 2) Michael Baker has provided environmental and the full suite of services to Orange County clients for over 50 years, giving us a unique understanding of the region and a proven track record for successful environmental clearance. • Time Frames for Responses to the City. We are especially proud of our track record and responsiveness to public agencies for on-call task order requests. Typical timelines can range from three to six months for (Mitigated) Negative Declarations and seven to twelve months for an EIR, depending upon the project complexities. We are also able to expedite preliminary CEQA or NEPA reviews, Addendums, technical studies, permits, peer reviews, and public outreach programs. • Proven Program Management Approach. The Michael Baker Team's management approach (described in detail below) has been proven on past projects to be effective in meeting or exceeding the client's goals for completing environmental documents on or ahead of schedule and within or below budget. Our experience in expediting regulatory permits and coordinating environmental reviews proves we have all the capabilities for delivering any project to meet and exceed your expectations. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL m PAGE 8 OF 19 318 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFI CATIONS FOR ON-CAL L ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSU L TING SERVICES LEGAL CHALLENGES INITIATION • Scope of Work • Kick-off Meeting • Data Review and Research TECHNICAL STUDIES • Data Requests at Kick-off • Adequate Project Description • Define Methodology • Document Findings CEQAREPORT • Initial Study • Confirm Findings o f Tech nica l Studies • Write Environmental Compliance Document Michael Baker prepares its reports under close coord ination with public agency legal counsel to ensure that the environmental documents and associated technical studies not only meet the requirements of CEQA, but also the public agency's regulations to gain applicable approvals. Controversial projects may involve litigation regardless of how well the environmental document is prepared. Michael Baker is not typically a party to litigation. As public agencies certify environmental documents using their independent judgment, Michael Baker may or may not be aware that a project or supporting documentation has even been challenged. Litigation regarding a public agency's decision may have little or nothing to do with document adequacy, therefore , in addition to what was explained above, a comprehensive list or other documentation regarding responses to such challenges, is difficult to provide. In circumstances where li tigation has been filed against an environmental document prepared by Michae l Baker fo r the public agency, and upon notification , we provide as much technical assistance in defending the environmental document as requested. At minimum, we typically provide assistance in assembling the administrative record as well as close coordination with agency legal counsel on preparing and responding to briefs. As noted above, Michael Baker prepared an EIR for the only seawater desalination project in the City (the Poseidon facility); this EIR was legally challenged by an environmental group, but the conclusions were upheld in court. Additionally, Michael Baker's Cont ract Manager, Alan Ashimine, has never had an environmental document successfully challenged in court through his 25 years preparing CE QA/NEPA documentation. Review o r Preparation of Technical Studies MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 9 OF 19 319 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES MANAGEMENT APPROACH Michael Baker's management approach has been proven effective in meeting and exceeding client expectations for environmental compliance tasks. We pride ourselves in on time and on budget delivery. We accomplish this through clear communication with City staff from task inception through project close-out. We will strategize with ur City staff to outline a logical path for each specific task order, with a clear scope of work, schedule , and budget. We believe in continuous close coordination , communication, and a focused project development process throughout the life of the project focused on targeted delivery of products on key milestones. Michael Baker's approach is designed to allow for regular interaction between City staff, the environmental consulting project team, and other interested/responsible governmental agencies and parties or stakeholders, which allows for frequent informat ion sharing among all project members. This approach will guide data exchange without loss of time or resources and will give City staff advance input on issues that arise. Such participation by the consultant minimizes duplication of research efforts, improves the technical quality and accuracy of analysis, and ultimately, reduces the cost of services. Regular interaction also allows the project team to offer expert advice and counsel to the City and other interested parties, particularly regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over key elements of the project. Michael Baker's recent proven track record examples include the Lido House Hotel (Newport Beach , CA), One Metro West Project (Costa Mesa, CA), Rialto Metrolink Affordable Housing Project (Rialto, CA), Alamitos Battery Energy Storage System (Long Beach , CA), and Laguna Beach Village Entrance (Laguna Beach, CA), among others. These projects all required close coordination with outside agencies including, the California Coastal Comm iss ion , California Department of Fish and Wildlife , Regional Water Quality Control Board , Department of Toxic Substances Control , California Department of Transportation (District 12), Orange County Transportation Authority, Army Corps of Engineers, and County of Orange. Regular communications with City staff and others allow the project team to determine potential issues up front , develop potential design features and /or mitigation measures, as well as develop sound , legally defensible documents. Our open public outreach capabilities, including scoping and the draft environmental review cycle, during the environmental clearance process also allows City staff to anticipate potential public concerns and ensure that these concerns are addressed in the environmental document. The Michael Baker Team is accustomed to working on highly controversial projects subject to public scrutiny, placing the utmost emphasis on providing clearly articulated analysis and conclusions that is easy for the reader to understand . QUALITY ASSURANCE APPROACH QUALITY ASSURANCE WORK STANDARDS J BEST PRACTICES J QUALITY AUD ITS Scope Schedule Budget ]- • Quality Control Procedures • Quality Assurance Reviews -by Project Manager -by Independent Reviewer ACHIEVING EXCELLENCE Producing high quality work is engrained into the Michael Baker culture. The Michael Baker QC/QA Program is applied to projects as a continuous process used not just at milestones but also daily, as workflows from desk to desk, discipline to discipline, and consultant to client. Michael Baker utilizes this QC /QA program on each and every project undertaken to make sure that a high-quality product is delivered on schedule and within budget. Our approach is set up to reduce potential errors in deliverables. Michael Baker's key organizational elements fo r QC/QA are adaptab le to any project. This quality process will be applied on a task-by-task basis to make sure that each deliverable is set up to meet your City standards for format , technical accuracy, consistency, and readability while being legally defensible. MICHAEL BAKER I NTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 10 OF 19 320 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIF ICATIONS FOR ON-CA LL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES C. STAFFING The Michael Baker Team will provide close coordination with the City, focused on technical accuracy of deliverables, while monitoring the budget and schedule. Michael Baker's Contract Manager, Alan Ashimine, will oversee the project team and be responsible for making sure the Michael Baker T earn completes each tas k to your satisfaction while meeting the City's goals and expectations. Alan will be supported by Task Manager who will coordinate the specific tas k order directly with the City's Project Manager and assigned staff. The Task Managers will be fu lly cognizant of the day to-day technical issues and develop consensus with City staff and the project team report back to Alan . Our goal is to provide the City with the most comp rehensive and qualified team, possessing the breadth of skills necessary to support anticipated environmental documentation projects. The benefit of our highly efficient team is that we can provide all services under a single roof, without the need fo r any outside subconsu ltants . The following organizational chart outlines our project management and environmental and technical team. In addition to these staff, we have over 100 other planners in the West that can be incorporated into any project to meet the City's needs. CONTRACT MANAGER Alan Ashimine I TASK MANAGERS Frances Yau, AICP Kristen Bogue I ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Kristen Bogue Biological Resources/ Cultural Resources/ Frances Yau, AICP Coastal & Regulatory Permitting Native American Consultation Art Popp James Daniels, PhD, RPA Jessica Ditto Travis Whitney Susan Wood, PhD Cristina Lowery Air Quality/GHG/Noise /Energy Hydrology/WQMP Kathalyn Tung Da nielle Millar Terrence Chen, PE, QSD/QSP Winnie Woo Darshan Shivaiah Andrew Bjork, MSCE, PE Allison Beauregard Hazardous Materials/ Aesthet ics Transportation Kristen Bogue Jordan Gray, PE Danielle Millar Alex Tapia, PE OVER 500 TECHNICAL AND SUPPORT PERSONNEL AVAILABLE FOR ASSIGNMENT Water Resources Geographic Information Systems Public Outreach Planning Landscape Architecture Structural Engineering Surface Water Land Development Transportation Planning Transportation Engineering Construction Management MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 11 OF 19 321 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-C ALL ENVIRONMENTAL (C EQA) CONSULTING SERVICES KEY STAFF ALAN ASHIM INE I CONTRACT MANAGER Years of Experience: 26 Mr. Ashimine will serve as Contract Manager and will be the main point of contact for the City. /........... Primary responsibilities will include oversight of daily operations, task management and staff ~~ selection, and scheduling to ensure tasks are on time and on budget. Mr. Ashimine manages the Environmental Sciences Department in Michael Baker's Santa Ana office. Mr. Ashimine's primary responsibilities include oversight of the department's daily operations, management of projects, staff mentoring and instruction, and scheduling and business development. He has extensive experience in the research, analysis, and writing of environmental documentation for a variety of projects involving infrastructure, redevelopment, residential , and industrial uses. Mr. Ashimine uses his experience to manage and author environmental documentation, often incorporating the results of complex technical documentation to substantiate conclusions within the document. Mr. Ashimine has also successfully prepared environmental documentation for a range of highly controversial projects subject to scrutiny by the general public, environmental organizations, and public agencies. Project Experience • Seawater Desalination (Poseidon) Project EIR, Project Coordinator • Remediation and Reuse of the Former Gun Range within Huntington Central Park EIR, Project Manager • Lincoln Specific Plan EIR, Project Manager CEQA GENERALIST TASK LEADS As Michael Baker's Task Managers, Kristen Bogue and Frances Yau will manage the assigned CEQA projects directly with the City's Project Manager, day-to-day technical issues, and develop consensus with City staff and the project team. KRISTEN BOGUE I TASK LEAD Years of Experience: 21 Ms. Bogue will serve as Environmental Task Lead. She will be assigned project management of awarded CEQA document task orders. She will be involved with day to day coordination with City staff, the environmental consulting project team , and other interested/responsible governmental agencies. Kristen is a recognized leader in CEQA and NEPA studies. She has successfully prepared environmental documentation for a range of highly controversial projects subject to scrutiny by the general public, environmental organizations, and public agencies. Using her broad background and understanding of environmental constraints, she provides detailed, legally sound CEQA/NEPA compliance review and environmental documentation. Kristen also serves as the technical lead for Visual Analysis and Hazardous Materials services at Michael Baker, with a specialty in visual impact assessments, shade/shadow studies, photometrics, as well as Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. Project Experience • One Metro West EIR, Project Manager • Cabrillo Mole Ferry Terminal Revitalization IS/MND, Project Manager • Victoria Boulevard Apartments EIR, Project Manager MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 12 OF 19 322 CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONS ULTING SERVICES FRANCES YAU , AICP I TASK LEAD Years of Experience : 13 Frances will serve as Environmental Task Lead. She will be assigned project management of awarded CEQA document task orders. She will be involved with day to day coord ination with City staff, the environmental consulting project team, and other interested/responsible governmental agencies. Ms. Yau is a Project Manager at Michael Baker. She draws from a diverse educational and work background that includes environmental planning , biological sciences, and urban and regional planning. She is knowle dgeable in the management and preparation of environmental compliance documents for both public and private sector clients under CEQA. Ms. Yau has extensive experience in preparing CEQA documents for a wide range of projects, including programmatic-level General Plans/Specific Plans, mixed-use, commercial , residential , and infrastructure projects. Project Experience • 3800 Via Oro EIR, Project Manager • 402 Atlantic Avenue 15183 CEQA Exemption, Project Manager • Bolsa Row EIR, Analyst • Chen Mini Storage IS/MND, Analyst • Dana Point Doheny Village Zoning District Update EIR, Senior Environmental Analyst • Victoria Boulevard Apartments EIR, Project Manager ADDITIONAL STAFF As Michael Baker's Technical Task Managers, the following specialists will manage technical analysis requests, verifying the necessary scope of work with both City staff and the Applicant and ensuring consistency with project description assumptions, CEQA adequacy, and methodology assumptions NAME I TASK I YEARS PROJECT EXPERIENCE Jessica Ditto CEQA Generalist 13 Years' Experience Cristina Lowery CEQA Generalist 19 Years' Experience Kathalyn Tung CEQA Generalist 21 Years' Experience Winnie Woo CEQA Generalist 7 Yea rs' Experience Allison Beauregard CEQA Generalist 6 Years' Experience • Laguna Beach Village Entrance Project, Environmental Analyst • Fire Station Number 12, Environmental Analyst • Redondo Avenue Environmental Services, Environmental Planner • Anna W. Ngai Alumni Center Proje ct, CEQA NOE, Environmental Analyst • Horn Center and University Art Museum Renovation Project, CEQA Notice of Exemption , Environmental Analyst • Housing Expansion Phase 1 -Housing Administration and Commons Building Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Environmental Analyst • Pasadena Environmental Coordination and Planning , Task Manager • LADWP Environmental Assessment and Air Quality Services, Task Manager • Green.Trucking Facility and Container Project, Environmental Planner • Victoria Place EIR, Environmental Associate • Tina-Pacific Neighborhood Development Plan Project, Environmental Associate • One Metro West EIR, Environmental Associate • Green Trucking Facility and Container Project, Environmental Planner • Hive Live Project, Environmental Planner • Victo ria Place EIR, Environmental Associate MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATI ONAL ■ PAGE 13 OF 19 323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON B EACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES NAME I TASK I YEARS PROJECT EXPERIENCE Art Popp Biological Resources Assessment 30 Years' Experience Travis Whitney Regulatory Permitting 18 Years' Experience Danielle Millar AQ/GHG/Noise/Energy 14 Years' Experience Darshan Shivaiah AQ/GHG /Noise/Energy 8 Years' Experience James Daniels, PhD, RPA Archaeological Reports Cultural Resources Reports 19 Years' Experience Susan Wood, PhD Historical Resources Reports 14 Years' Experience Terrence Chen, P.E., QSD/QSP Preliminary Hydrology Drainage Report Preliminary Water Study Preliminary WQMP Sewer Study 27 Years' Experience Andrew Bjork, MSCE, PE Preliminary Hydrology Drainage Report Preliminary Water Study Preliminary WQMP Sewer Study 11 Years' Experience Jordan Gray, PE Transportation Stud ie s VMT Ana lysis Local Transportation Analysis 11 Years' Experience Alex Tapia, PE Transportation Studies VMT Analysis Local Transportation Analysis 8 Years' Experience • Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project EIR, Task Manager • Collins Island Bridge Replacement Project, Task Manager • Oceanside Transit Center Redevelopment EIR, Task Manager • Environmental Services for the Meredith International Centre, Task Manager • Orangewood Avenue Improvements Project, Task Manager • CEQA Consultant Services for Rancho Sonado Project, Task Manager • Bewley Street Townhomes IS/MN D, Senior Air Quality and Noise Specialist • Environmental 3025 W. Edinger Townhomes , Air Quality and Noise Specialist • 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed-Use Project EIR, Air Quality and Noise Specialist • Green Trucking Facility and Container Project, Technical Specialist • Cypress Village Mixed Use Project EIR, Technical Specialist • Emergency Generator Environmental Review, Technical Specialist • El Caballo Park Master Plan Environmental Review, Senior Archaeologist • Environmental Consulting Services, Senior Archaeologist • Hive Live Project, Senior Archaeo logist • 255-290 Maple Court Mixed Use Project IS/MND , Senior Archaeologist • Victoria Place IS /MN D, Task Manager • Collins Island Bridge Replacement Project, Task Manager • South Coast REC IS/M ND, Task Manager • Orange County On-Call Services, Eng ineer • NPDES Program Management Support Services, Engineer • Water Quality Management Plan Verification, Engineer • Culver City Stormwater Quality Master Plan, Engineer • I-10/Avenue 60 Interchange and Avenue 50 Extension, Engineer • Alessandro Boulevard Median, Engineer • Archibald Avenue Improve ment Project, Engineer • Cow Camp Road and Bridges Phase 18, Civil Associate • NPDES Program Management Support Services , Civil Associate • Felipe Road /Oso Parkway Intersection Widening , Civil Associate • Bastanchury Road Im provements, Civil Associate • Feli pe Road /Oso Parkway Intersection Widening, Civil Associate • Monroe Interchange Engineering and Planning Services, Civil Associate • Pacific Arroyo Development Hydraulic Analysis, Civil Associate • Hive Live EIR, Civil Engineer • Victoria Place IS/MND, Civil Engineer • Costa Mesa Parking Study, Civil Engineer • Costa Mesa One Metro West EIR, Civil Engineer • Hanson Hotel Section VMT Analysis, Civil Engineer • Victoria Place IS/MND, Civil Engineer • Studebaker and S.R. 22 Realignment, Civil Engineer • Queens Highway Temporary Amphitheatre Project, Civi l Engineer • 255-290 Maple Court Mixed Use Project IS/MND , Civil Engineer • 1675 Santa Fe Avenue Warehouse Project CE, Civil Engineer MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 14 OF 19 324 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES D. QUALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES Michael Baker is a full-service consulting firm providing land use planning, environmental compliance, sustainability, engineering, architecture, community engagement, and related professional services for over 85 years. We have the qualifications, experience, and staff to provide virtually any environmental consulting services Huntington Beach may need. Refer to the 'Background and Experience' and 'Staffing ' sections for additional qualifications of the project team. Following are examples of projects within the last five years with similar scopes of work that may be requested by City staff under this on-call contract. CITY OF DANA POINT ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES Michael Baker has provided the City of Dana Point on-call environmental consulting services for range of projects requiring CEQA clearance documentation, as well as technical studies. Notable projects include: • Headlands Trail Project Exe mption Analysis and Initial Study (Ongoing) • Victoria Boulevard Apartments EIR (2024) • Victoria Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (2024) • Doheny Village Zoning District Update EIR (2021) CITY OF COSTA MESA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Michael Baker has provided the City of Costa Mesa with on-call environmental consulting services for range of projects requ iring CEQA clearance documentation, as well as technical studies. Notable projects include : • Hive Live EIR (2026) • Victoria Place EIR (2025) • Capo Hillside Project IS/MND Support Services (2024) • One Metro West EIR (2021) • Chen Mini Warehouse Auto Storage Facility Class 32 CE Report (2020) • No. 1 Collision Project Class 32 CE Report (2020) City of Dana Point Ms. Bel inda Deines, AICP bdeines@danapoint.org 949.248.3570 Key Staff: • Kristen Bogue, Project Director • Alan Ashimine, QA/QC Frances Yau, Project Ma nager Jessica Ditto , Environmental Analyst • Winnie Woo, Environmental Ana lyst • Allison Beauregard , Environmental Analyst • Danielle Millar, Air Quality & Noise • Darshan Shivaiah, Air Quality & Noise City of Costa Mesa Ms . Carrie Tai , AICP Carrie. ta i@costamesaca.gov 714 .754.5270 Key Staff: • Kriste n Bogue, Project Director Frances Yau , Project Manager • Alan Ashimine, QA/QC • Winnie Woo, Environmental Analyst • Allison Beauregard, Environmental Analyst • Danielle Millar, Air Quality & Noise • Darshan Shivaiah, Ai r Quality & Noise • Art Popp, Se nior Biologist • James Daniels, Archaeolog ist • Susan Wood, Architectu ral Hi story • Jordon Gray, Civil Engineer MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAG E 15 OF 19 325 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF BURBANK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Michael Baker has provided the City of Burbank with on-call environmental consulting services for range of projects requiring CEQA clearance documentation, as well as technical studies. Notable projects include: • 2801 Thornton Avenue (2026) • Library-Civic Center (2026) • 910 S. Mariposa Street (2025) • Starbucks Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report (2023) • 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed Use Project Focused EIR (2022) CITY OF LONG BEACH ENVIRONMENTAUPLANNING SERVICES Michael Baker has been retained by the City of Long Beach to provide on-call environmental/planning services for a diverse range of projects requiring CEQA and NEPA clearance documentation . Notable projects include: • 3800 Via Oro (Ongoing) • 402 Atlantic Avenue (2026) • 4040 Bellflower Boulevard (2026) • 300 Alamitos Ave Peer Review (2024) • Santa Fe Self Storage Facility CE (2024) • 1911 Pacific Coast Highway Project IS/MND (2023) • Building Standards Code Amendments IS/MND (2020) City of Bu rbank Mr. Federico "Fred " Ramirez fra mirez@burbankca.gov 818.238.5293 Key Staff: • Kristen Bogue, Project Director • Frances Yau, Project Manager • Alan Ashimine, QA/QC • Win nie Woo, Environmental Analyst • Allison Beauregard , Environmental Analyst • Danielle Millar, Air Quality & Noise • Darshan Shiva iah, Air Quality & Noise • Art Popp, Senior Biologist City of Long Beach Ms. Amy Harbin Amy .harbin@longbeach.gov 562.570.6872 Key Staff: • Alan Ashimine, Project Director • Frances Yau, Project Manager • Kristen Bogue, Environmental Specialist • Jessica Ditto, Environmental Analyst • Winnie Woo, Environmental Analyst • Allison Beauregard, Environmental Analyst • Danielle Millar, Air Quality & Noise • Darshan Shivaiah, Air Quality & Noise • Susan Wood, Architectural History • Jordon Gray, Civil Engineer • Alex Tapia , Civil Engineer MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 16 OF 19 326 CITY OF HUNTINGTON B EACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Michael Baker has provided the City of San Clemente with on-call environmental consulting services for range of projects requiring CEQA clearance documentation, as well as technical studies since 2018. Notable projects include: • Hanson Hotel Section 15183 (Ongoing) • 1801 North El Camino Real (2026) • West Pico Corridor Specific Plan Update and Architectural Overlay Expansion (2023) ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS EDISON PARK RECONFIGURATION AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Michael Baker International assisted the City of Huntington Beach with the preparation of a CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compliance Checklist for the Edison Park Reconfiguration and Improvements Project (project). This City of San Clemente Jonathan Lifghtfoot lightfootj@san-clemente.org 949.361 .8254 Key Staff: . . . . . . . . . Kristen Bogue, Project Director Frances Yau, Project Manager Alan Ashimine, QA/QC Winnie Woo, Environmental Analyst Allison Beauregard, Environmental Analyst Darshan Shivaiah, Air Quality & Noise Art Popp, Senior Biologist Susan Wood , Architectural History Jordon Gray, Civil Engineer City of Huntington Beach Ashley Wysocki Ashley.wysocki@surfcity-hb .org 714 .374.5302 City-initiated project proposes to reconfigure the Edison Community Park and create new park amenities. The various new and upgraded amenities, including new sports courts, wheel sports, playground, trees , walkways, parking lot, and access, would offer diversified recreation and allow for more park engagement. The resettling and sinking amenities would be cleared under the project to allow for more open space. The project is proposed to be constructed in three phases to allow portions of the park to remain open during construction. The Section 15183 analysis considered project-specific impacts related to air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, vehicle miles travelled (VMT), cultural resources, and geology and soils, among others. MICHAEL BAKER INT E RNATIONAL ■ PAGE 17 OF 19 327 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ■ REQU EST FOR QU ALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (C EQA) CONSULTING SERVICE S HANSON HOTEL SECTION 15183 Michael Baker International is assiting the City of San Clemente with the preparation of a CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Compl iance Checklist for the Hasan Hotel Project (project). The project proposes City of San Clemente Johnathan Ciampa john@communitycounterpartservices.com 949.246.5913 the development of the Hanson Hotel , a three-story, 61-room boutique hotel featuring a pool, cafe, roof-top restaurant with amplified music, and a subterranean parking garage with 104 parking stalls. The project includes 25 percent affordable hotel rooms (16 rooms) to enhance low-cost, visitor-serving opportunities and is designed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style to align with the Architectural Overlay and the North Beach Historic District's character. The Section 15183 analysis considers the project's considerations included in the City's General Plan Enviornmental Impact Report, as well as project-specific impacts related to air quality, energy, greenhouse gas em issions, no ise , cultural resources , and biological resources , among others. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 18 OF 19 328 CITY OF HUNTI NGTON B EACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIF ICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVICES E. FEE SCHEDULE Michael Baker's fee schedule has been provided in a separate document. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 19 OF 19 329 330 EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULT ANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: SEE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT B B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billing I. All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen (15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who performed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other documentation prepared by CONSULT ANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULT ANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULT ANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSUL TANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSUL TANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULT ANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 331 S. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be umeasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 332 EXHIBIT 8 CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) CONSULTING SERVIC ES E. FEE SCHEDULE Hourly rates for key staff are provided below for Michael Baker. Per the RFQ, these rates are valid for a period of 180 days. Any renewal/extension options of the on-call list following the three-year period would require a review of rates by the Michael Baker team. CLASSIFICATION FEE Senior Principal $330-390 Principal $300 -360 Program Manager $270 -335 Project Director $255-325 Senior Project Manager I Technical Manager I Principal Planner $245-310 Project Manager $235-300 Technical Manager I Task Manager $225 -290 Senior Engineer $215-275 Senior Planner $205-265 Landscape Architect $165-245 Project Engineer / Senior Environmental Specialist $165-245 Senior GIS Analyst $150-230 Environmental Specialist $145-170 GIS Analyst $135-170 Designer / Associate Planner $120 -155 Project Coordinator $115 -145 Environmental Analyst $110 -140 Design Techn ician $110 -130 Graphic Artist $125-190 Assistant Planner / Engineer $95 -125 Planning Technician / Engineering Aid $85 -115 Office Support / Clerical $85 -115 OTHER DIRECT CHARGES Charge Price/Unit Charge Price/Unit Reproduction -B&W Regular 0.08 CADD At Cost Reproduction -B&W Oversized 0.14 Communications At Cost Reproduction -Color 0.45 Computer Usage At Cost Reproduction -Color Oversized 0.70 Equipment and Supplies At Cost Mileage Current IRS Rate Note : Reproduction, messenger service , and other direct expenses wi ll be charged as direct cost MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATI ONAL ■ PAGE 1 OF 1 333 _ _______, .. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE(>.11.VODIYYYY) ACC>R c, 1.-.,..-----0J/2512026 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTI FICATE HOLDER . THIS CERTI FICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATI VELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY TH E POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTI TUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING I NSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: II tho cortincato ho1dor I s an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollc~les) must have ADDITI ONAL INSURED p rovisions or be endorsed. 11 SUB ROGATION IS WAIVED, subj ect to the terms and conditions of the policy, c ertain pollcl es may requ ire an endors em en t. A s tatement o n this certrncate d oes not confer ri ghts to th o certifi cate hol d er In lleu o f such end ors omont(s). PRODUCER fiR(W:-CT Aon Ri sk serv ic e s cent r al , I n c . Fitl1flfo.rn), (866) 283 -71 22 1 r.e~.110.,, (800) 363-0105 Pittsb urgh PA office EQT Pl a za~ s u ite 2700 U t AJ~ss: 62 5 Libert y Avenue Pi tt s bu rg h PA 15 22 2 -3110 USA IIISU RER(S) AFFOROIIIO COVER AGE PIAICI lllSUREO L'ISURf:RA: Zur ich Amer ican I n s co 16 53 5 Mich ael Baker In te rnational , I nc. t,ISURER B: A 11 i ed worl d surplus L in es Insurance Co 24 319 9 635 Granite Ridg e Dr iv e s uite 30 0 1t;SUR.fRC: San Di ego CA 9 2 1 23 USA UiSURER O; UISURE R E: !USURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER· 57011 87371 15 REVIS ION NUMBER: TttlS IS TO CERTIFY TttAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELO\'/ HAVE BEE/I ISSUED TO TttE INSURED NAI.IED ABOVE FOR TttE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. rroTV~THSTAllDING AIIY REQUIREMENT. TERI.I OR CONDITID~ OF NIY CONTRACT DR OTHER DOCUMENT \\1Ttt RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE 1.IAY BE ISSUED DR l,IAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE ~FFDROED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TD ALL TttE TERI.IS, EXCLUSIONS AND CO:IDITIDNS OF SUCH POLICIES. U/,IITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN R EDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. U mlls shown are as re q uested •rtR TYPE OF L''SURAIICE 1RfA ,,'I& POLICY UUIIOE R 1f.~l;b'ii'r#fv1 1t,9,¼"oW-:;.1 l l!.'ITS A X COM'Jf.RCIAL OE.IIERAL LIABILITY GLOU 9t<o l 04 U O/ OU/ <UL> U O/ >0t202t> EACH OCCURREJ;ce Sl,000,00 0 ,-... D CI.All.lS-UAOE 0 occuR -• •••--1v •• ~.1c:u Sl,000,00C PREl,1tSES (Ea ('(C'-'rtr.ce) 1-- UEO EXP (An:, one t-tnon) Sl 0,00( PERsm, .. J. & ADV l:IJURY S2 ,000,00C GEIILAGGREGATE Ll 1,lrT APFUES PER GEl:ERAL AGGREGATE S4 ,000, OOC R POLICY 0 PRO· 0 LOC PRODUCTS · COUP,'OP AGG $4 ,0 00 ,00( JECT OTHER 6 1R/Otductb'e $25 0,00( A AUTOLtOSII.E UASILITY BAP 4197284-0 4 08/30/202 5 08/30/202 6 COl.'61f:Eo s1:GLE LIWT Sl,000 ,00C !Ea ac<<itnl) 1--B00:tY 1,'IJURY ( Ptt S:ttY.ln) Sl,000,00C X AJIYAUTO 1--~ SCHEOUl£D 800:LY IWURY (Ptt a<c:Ju,I) Sl,000 ,00C O\".1:ED AUTOS -AUTOSOllLY 1--PROPERTY DA1,1AGE Sl , 000, 00( HREOAVTOS t:o~,-o,·,r.eo (Pe, acc".dMt) -0.'iLV -AUTOSOULV Ot-du<t t>'e $250 ,00( Ut.1 0R£llA UAB H OCCUR EACH OCCURREl:ce -AGGREGATE EXCESS I.LAB ClAll,!S-!.IAOE orn I (RETEIITIO,i A \'/ORKERS COYPEHSATIOU AIID WC41 9728204 08/30/2025 08/30/2026 X I PER STATUTE I l ~JH· EWPLOYERS' LIABILITY ~ Viti AOS ~tf FROFR ETOA f PA.'tn,fll I U[C.VTr.1: I WC4 19728504 08/30/2025 0 8/30/2026 E l EACH ACCIDEtH Sl,0 00,00 C A OIT,C UI \l[\IIER ucu,NOf ,,,,.. jlJ.1nd.ato,yW'I t l H) I'll El DISEASE-EA EU PLOY EE Sl,000 ,000 gii~~ff~ ~,~PERAT10.•~5 tot'4.V EL O!SEASE..POUCY U111T Sl ,000 ,000 • E&O -Professional Liability 031248 06 08/30/2025 08/3 0/202 6 Per Cla i m Sl ,0 0 0 ,00C Pr i mary c lai ms /.lade Aggre gate Sl , 0 00, OOC SIR appl ies per pol icy te r ins & condi ions SIR/D eductibl e S200,00( OESCRIPTIO:I Of Ol'ERATIOUS I LOCATK>IIS/VfHICLES (ACORD 101.Addi'ISonal R1:ma1k1 Schl:dul~. fflJY l>t an.echtd tt mo,a space II r~ulred) RE : On Cal l CEQA Envi ronment a l Se r vices Con trac t. City of Hun ti n3 t on Beac h , i t s officers , elected o r appo i n t ed o f f icials emp l o1ees , a3en t s and v o lun teers a r e includ ed as Additional Insur e in a cco r d anc e with the policy provisions of the Gen r a1 • Liabi i ty a n Au tomobile Liabili t y polici e s. General L i a bili ty poli cy evi d enc ed h e r ein i s Pri mar y and Non -Contri butory ~ o t h er i nsu r ance av a ilable to Additi o nal I nsu r ed, but on ly in accord an c e with t he policy 's p r ovisions. Shou l d Ge n~e r al Li ab ility, Au tomobile Liabil i ty a nd t~ork ers ' c ompen sat i on ~oli cie s be canc e lled before t~FW~~m,~,·~ty:?~ t c~ provisions of ea ch 11olic~ wil l govern how not i ce of cancel a t ion may be d elivered t o c e r I n a c or ith tlE p o l icy p rovisi o n s of e a c pol icy. n . CERTIF ICATE HOLDE R citb of Hunti ngton Be ach 200 Ma i n Street, 3rd Fl oor Hu n ting ton Beach CA 9 26 48 USA ACORD 26 (2016/03) CANCELLATION M I CHAEL J . V IGLI OTTA SHOULD AIJY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED pouc< ¥ ~l l QBliUo,l. lHE ·•wn011 DATE THEREOF, IIOIICE \'/Ill BE OHM Rf(! l'W O~'Ff crftf'IN'e}TON 'BE'AC AUTHORIZED REPRESEUTATIVE ~~g~ ~~ ©1988-2016 ACORD CORPORATION. All rfgh l s reserved The ACORD name a nd logo ar e re g i st ered ma rks o f ACO RD - ■I Professional Service Contracts On Call Environmental (CEQA) Services April 7, 2026 334 Statement of Issue PROJECT SITE GARFIELD AVE. GO L D E N W E S T S T . •The City receives applications for various projects that sometimes requires official CEQA review (California Environmental Quality Act). •These documents require technical studies on specific topics such as geology, hydrology, noise and air quality, which require expert analysis from qualified professionals in the respective fields. 335 Selection of Consultants PROJECT SITE GARFIELD AVE. GO L D E N W E S T S T . •On January 15, 2026, the city posted a request for qualifications on Planet Bids. The Bid posting attracted 23 firms to submit proposals of qualifications. •The Community Development Department formed a review committee to review the proposals. The top four firms were selected for award of an on-call contract. 336 Analysis •Each contract requested for approval would be for the same amount. Consultants will still be required to submit proposals for any new project that is requested and a task order will be issued to confirm scope of work. There is no guarantee of work for any consultant. •Preparation of a CEQA Document can vary greatly from $50,000 to $500,000. The total amount of the contracts is an estimated total of workload over the next 3 years. The CEQA work is primarily funded by the Developer/Applicant through a Reimbursement agreement that is formally executed through the City Attorney’s office. 337 Recommendation Approve and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute contracts for $700,000 each for the following consultants: •LSA Associates (LSA) •Environmental Science Associates (ESA) •Environmental Planning Development (EPD) Solutions •Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI) 338 Ill QUESTIONS 339 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-289 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Eric Parra, Chief of Police PREPARED BY:Yasha Nikitin, Police Captain and Kimberly Rodriguez, Management Analyst Subject: Approval of Sole-Source Purchase and Installation of Two Trakka TL-360 Searchlight System for Police Department Air Support Unit Statement of Issue: The Huntington Beach Police Department’s Air Support Unit currently utilizes the Spectrolab SX-16 searchlight system on its helicopters. This system is outdated and increasingly presents operational and maintenance challenges. The SX-16 requires a high level of electrical power, placing significant strain on the aircraft’s electrical system and contributing to reliability concerns during flight operations. As the system ages, maintenance costs have continued to rise due to more frequent repairs and the increasing need for replacement parts. Additionally, the SX-16 presents compatibility challenges with the department’s existing camera and mapping systems, further impacting overall system performance and efficiency. Although the department’s Spectrolab SX-16 searchlight system, which is approximately 15 years old, has been refurbished to extend its service life, these efforts have not fully addressed ongoing issues related to age, wear, and technological limitations. The SX-16 is also limited in functionality, offering only approximately 45 degrees of motion. This restriction often requires repositioning of the helicopter to properly illuminate a target area, reducing operational efficiency. In contrast, the Trakka TL-360 searchlight requires significantly less electrical power, approximately one-third of the SX-16, reducing strain on the aircraft’s electrical system and improving reliability. It also integrates with the helicopter’s existing camera platform and provides a full 360-degree range of motion, allowing precise illumination without frequent aircraft repositioning. Overall, replacing the aging SX-16 systems with the Trakka TL-360 will improve operational effectiveness, reduce maintenance costs, and enhance the safety and reliability of the Air Support City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 3 340 File #:26-289 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Financial Impact: The purchase and installation of the Trakka TL-360 searchlight systems is estimated to cost approximately $149,574, with adequate funding available in the current budget. Recommended Action: Approve sole-source purchase and installation of Trakka TL-360 Searchlight system. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve purchase and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: The Trakka TL-360 searchlight is an industry-leading system widely used by law enforcement aviation units to support critical aerial operations. Upgrading to the TL-360 will enable the Air Support Unit (ASU) to continue providing effective support to police, fire, and marine safety personnel operating on the ground and on the water. Once installed, the TL-360 will integrate with each helicopter’s existing mapping and camera systems, allowing the flight crew to control both the searchlight and camera through a single interface. This integration improves operational efficiency, reduces crew workload, and enhances overall safety during aerial missions. Installation must be performed by a vendor designated by the manufacturer and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as a repair station. Based on these requirements, Hangar One Avionics, Inc. (Hangar One) is the most appropriate vendor. Hangar One is the closest qualified repair station, is certified to perform work on the MD 530F helicopter platform, and is already utilized by the department for ongoing maintenance services. This familiarity ensures the installation will meet all FAA and manufacturer standards. As part of the evaluation process, the department researched alternative searchlight systems and vendors and found no comparable options that match the performance and capabilities of the Trakka TL-360. The department also explored other FAA-certified repair stations but did not identify any facilities within a reasonable proximity to Huntington Beach capable of performing the installation. Accordingly, Hangar One Avionics is the most practical and qualified vendor to complete the installation, supporting the justification for a sole-source procurement. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 8 - Public Safety, Strategy B - Bolster City's emergency management preparedness and City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 3 341 File #:26-289 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. Sole-Source Justification - Trakka 2. Invoices - Trakka Systems City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 3 of 3 342 343 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Sole-Source Justification (Fo r use on all goods and services acquisitions .) This justification document consists of two (2) pages. All information must be provided and all questions must be answered. The "Required Approvals" section must include a date for each signature, as appropriate for the transaction. RequestinQ Department Information Date: February 26, 2026 Requestor Name: Sgt. Jerry Goodspeed Division Manager: Capt. Nikitin (Type names. Do not sion.) Department: Police Department Head: Chief Parra (Type names. Do not sion . Must be same as sionature below.) Department Contact Information Contact Name: Jerry Goodspeed Street Address: 18401 Gothard St., Telephone: 714-536-5997 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fax: Shipping Address: Same Cellular phone: Required Contact Information Contractor/Supplier Name: Trakka USA LLC Contractor/Supplier Address: 4725 Lena Rd. Contractor/Supplier City/State/Zip: Bradenton FL, 34211 Original Contract Amount:* Amendment Amount:* (if applicable} New Contract Amount:* $None $NIA $149,574 (•Includes original contract and previously (•Includes origina l contract and all amendments, annroved amendments) 1•current amendment onlv) includina current amendment) Provide a brief description of the acquisition, includinQ all Qoods and/or services the contractor will provide: Purchase of searchlight for helicopter. Contract Type and Term Contract Type: Contract Term: What account number will be used to purchase? Select One: ~ Goods Begin: Business Unit: □ Service □ Goods & Services End: Object Code: Required Approvals i:e urtm t Head Principal Finance Chief Financial Officer Assistant City Manager ve D Denied Analyst ~pproved D Denied 1;21 Approved D Denied h, ._ -,::z_ ~~Deoied ~& 1,,-_,e -,,, I Signatu~%°"-1' t". v/! 3 L4~re - 1)-7/4 ;;,Jz z sigrrat7 Signature ~ l t1J l ~" L Y' I 7 Date 0 3 , 0 ta~ :)..() ')...k, Date , I -Date (Transactions exceeding $50,000 must be aooroved by City Councill 344... CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Sole Source Justification (For use o n all goods and services acquisitions .) Complete responses must be provided for all of the following items. A. THE GOOD/SERVICE REQUESTED IS RESTRICTED TO ONE SUPPLIER FOR THE REASONS STATED BELOW: 1. Why is the acquisition restricted to this goods/services/supplier? (Explain why the acquisition c annot be competitively bid .) The Air Support Unit (ASU) has a searchlight in each Helicopter to help the flight crew to aid the officers on the ground in locating and identifying suspects and missing persons, as well as, providing a safer enviornment for police officers, firefighters and marine safety to work. The current seachlight system is outdated and the product is no longer combatible with the updated systems in our helicopter(s). The Trakka Systems searchlight, "TrakkaBeam TL-360" is the industry leading system to assist in the critical functions needed to complete our ASU mission. The change to the TL-360 system will allow the ASU to continue to provide the needed service to our police, fire and marine safety assests on the ground. When installed in each helicopter, the light will be wired to sync with the mapping and camera systems in the helicopter. This will allow the flight crew to manipulate both the light and camera simultaniously using only one remote, increasing the efficiency of the flight crew improving their saftey. 2. Provide the background of events leading to this acquisition. The current seachlight systems installed on our helicopters are the "Spectrolab SX-16"searchlight. This system has become outdated and has recently presented functionality and safety issues for our helicopters. The power to run the SX-16 with our currently flight systems has put a strain on our airship's power systems and had lead to electrical issues during flight. The TL-360 requires approximately one third of the power to run while providing a brighter light. The SX-16 is only capable of moving approximately 45 degrees of travel, which at times requires the helicopter to move in order for the light to be on target. The TL-360 is based offs of a camera platform and will allow the flight crew to have a full 360 dergees of motion, matching that of our camera systems. The TL-360 will require less maintenance costs then the SX-16 with longer less expensive light bulbs. 3. Describe the uniqueness of the acquisition (why was the good/service/supplier chosen?). The Trakka Beam TL-360 is only sold by Trakka USA LLC. The searchlight is the only light on the market that provides 360 degrees of travel with one third the power consumpton of traditional searchlights. Allowing the light to sync seamlessly with our mapping and camera systems. The gimbal used to move the searchlight is the only system that uses a camera gimbal to help mimic our camera. Currently the flight crew needs to use two remotes and smaller flight angles to shine the light on the target. The TL-360 is smaller and lighter then other systems allowing us to save on fuel cost. In November of 2025 we installed the first of three lights onto our helicopter. The Trakka lights require proprietary wire harness instalation that will not be compatible with any other systems and each helicopter will need to be outfitted for the Trakka light. 4. What are the consequences of not purchasing the goods/services or contracting with the proposed supplier? Our current systems have become outdated and expensive to repair. Our current SX-16 is not able to function properly with our current mapping and camera systems, which has caused the electrical system in the helicopter to be over taxed causing safety issues during flight. 5. What market research was conducted to substantiate no competition, including evaluation of other items considered? 2 345 (Provide a narrative of your efforts to identify other similar or appropriate goods/services, including a summary of how the department concluded that such alternatives are either inappropriate or unavailable. The names and addresses of suppliers contacted and the reasons for not considering them must be included OR an explanation of why the swvey or effort to identify other goods/services was not performed.) During the research of purchasing a new lighting system, we discovered there were no vendors comparable to The Trakka Systems, TrakkaBeam TL-360 and the manufacture provided the best price for the light. If elected to not rewire each aircraft then we would have a mixed fleet of helicopters, which would go against our core helicopter purchase. With have three identical heicopters, which allows us to interchange the systems, such as, the light or camrea. This allows us to have back up system for each helicopter incase of a malfunction. If we had a mix system and the helicopter currently wired for the light has an issue, we could not substitute the light onto another helicopter while a repair is being made. We have searched out other possible replacements for the SX-16, including Spectrolab's "XP IR LED" light, which is still in the testing phase. Luminator Aerospace's "Orion" searchlight, which had the same 110 Amp startup power requirements as the SX-16. This startup is too much for our helicpoters to handle and was priced above the Trakka TL-360. B. PRICE ANALYSIS 1. How was the price offered determined to be fair and reasonable? (Explain what the basis was for comparison and include cost analyses as applicable.) The price was consistent with current market values for similar services and products. 2. Describe any cost savings realized or costs avoided by acquiring the goods/services from this supplier. Remit completed form to: City of Huntington Beach -Purchasing Division 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2702 3 346 Bill To City of Huntington Beach SARAYE SHARI P.O. Box 784 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 TAX INVOICE Delive r To City of Huntington Beach Jerrald Goodspeed 18401 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 US100570 Cu stome r No. Document Dat e Orde r No . Due Dat e Paymen t Te r m s Ref. No . ~SC0119 7 jog Oct 2025 j USS0-00265 _I jos Nov 202s ! 30 Days from Invoice Date r----. 32632 -0P -~-- No . Revis i on Cu st om e r Ref . Descripti on 900-1003-000-00 5 TL360 Searchlight 021016 -0101140 Grip Hand Controller Assembly TS-091011 C Grip Controller Mount Assembly 037003 G Dovet ai l Mounting Block 420-1002-040030 2 EXTERNAL BLKHD COM MS CABLEASSY, OPTION 1 4 20-0003· 100080 1 OMNI-VISION INT BULKHEAD POWER CABLE ASSEMBLY 041084 C Cable Coiled 13 way (Grip MKII) Door-To-Door Shipping SX-16 Trade-In NB . All bank charge s to be paid by customer/payer Payment by El ectronic Fu nds Tran sfer ~ Account Name: L::::J Dank: Trakka USA LLC Wells Fargo ll135 FL-70 E Bradenton, Florida 34202 Direct Dep. Rou ti ng No: 107002192 Account No: SWIFT Code: 7195428359 WFBIUS6S Please slate Tax Invoice number as reference Tra k k a USA LLC Re mi tt an ce Ad vi ce M Please email remittance advice to: Caro l lne.Talng@trakkasystems.com Deli veries ~ All delivery communications "'1-fv' sh lpplng@trakkasystems.com 9 4 72 5 Lrn,1 RoJCI U nil 103 Br aclcn to,1, Flor id ~ 34 2 I I Qty. 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 UOM Unit Pr ice Disc.% Each 62,130.00 Each 4,407.00 Each 634.00 Each 978.00 Each 1,20 1.80 Each 1,201.80 Each 1,201.80 Each 250.00 Each ·S,000.00 Total$ ~ \\'W W .\fd ~k.1~y::,t1.;-,ni; {OIH \. • I (9 ~ l ) 500 5 1S~ £!I 1n fo(@ 1r,1l:l·.,1,y,1,0 n1 •,.com Total Amoun t 62,130.00 4,407.00 1,268.00 1,956.00 2,403.60 2,403.60 1,201.80 250.00 -5,000.00 71,020.00 347 TAX INVOICE US100571 Bill To City of Huntington Beach SARAYE SHARI P.O. Box 784 Huntington Beac h, CA 92648 De l iver To City o f Hu ntington Beac h Jerrald Goodspeed 18401 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Cust om er No. [usco119 Do cu m ent Date Or der No . Du e Date [0 8 Nov 202s Paym e nt Terms llef . No . @ 632 -0P I o9 o .:~022 7 I USS0-00265 -=] [ 30 Days from Invoice Date ~ No. Rev ision Cust om e r Re f. 420-1003-020080 2 420-0002-120030 2 Descript i on INTERNAL BLKHD COM MS CABLEASSY, OPTION 1 OMNI-VISION EXT PWR CABLE ASSY NB . All bank ch arges to be pa i d by customer/payer Payment by El ectronic Funds Tran sfer ~ Account Name: l==-..J Bank: Trakka USA LLC W ells Fargo 11135 Fl-70E Bradenton, Florida 34202 Direct Dep. Routing No: 107002192 Account No: SWIFT Code: 7 195428359 WFBIU$6S Pl ease sta te Tax Invoice number as reference T rakk a USA LLC Remittance Advice fi Please email remillance advice to: Caroline.Talng@trakka systems.com Deliveries ~ All de livery com mu nications ~f!," shlpplng@trakkasystems.com 9 4 /1', I P IM Hoa(! U111 t 103 llr ,1d 1>nt o n , Flo rid ,1 3,12 1 I Qt y. 1 UOM U n it Pr ice Disc.% Each 1,201.80 Each 1,201.80 Total$ '-) www.\1,th ~,hy \tt.•m~.co1 ,1 \. tl (~•l l)500S 158 m inl oQil tr,1,~.~s y\tcm,.com To tal Amount 1,201.80 1,201.80 2,403.60 348 TAX INVOICE US100574 Bill To City of Huntington Beach $ARAVE SHARI P.O. £lox 784 Huntington £leach, CA 92648 Deliver To City of Huntington Beach Jerrald Goodspeed 18401 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Cu st om er No . Document Dat e Orde r No . Due Dat e Paym en t Ter ms Rel. No . ~SC0119 -7 j 13 Oct 2025 ~ I USS0-00265 J j 12 Nov 2025 f 30 Days from ~oice Date -I l 32632 -0P- No . Re vision Cu st om er Ref. 420 -1003-020080 2 420 -0002-120030 2 Descrip tion INTERNAL OLKHD COMMS CABLEASSY, OPTION l OMNI-VISION EXT PWR CABLE ASSV NB . All ban k ch arg es t o IJ e p aid by cu stom er/pay er Payment by Electron ic Funds Transfer ~ Account Name: l:.:...J Bank: Direct Dep. Routing No: Accoun t No: SWIFT Code: Trakka USA LLC Wells Fargo 11135 FL-70E Bradenton, Florida 34202 107002192 7195428359 WFBIUS6S Please st ate Tax Invoice number as reference Trakka USA LLC Remittance Advice fi Please emai l remittance advice to: Carollne.Talng@trakkasystems.com Deliveries ~ All delivery communications ~,,, shlpplng@trakkasystems.com 9 •I 72 5 Len a Road Un i t 103 OradM l OJl, Flnr1d,1 34 21 1 Qty . 1 1 UOM Unit Pri ce Di sc.% Ea ch 1,201.80 Each 1,201.80 Total$ ~ w w w .11akka,ys1e,ns.ro111 \. t i (94 1)500515!< L'!l/j lnfo(L~l r~~~a ,y st~ms.co11 1 --I Tot al Amou nt 1,201.80 1,20 1.80 2,403.60 349 TAX INVOICE US100594 Bill To City of Huntington !leach SARAYE SHARI P.O. !lox 784 Huntingt on Beach, CA 92648 Delive r To City of Huntington Beach Jerrald Goodspeed 18401 Gothard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Cust omer No. Do cument Date Order No. Due Dat e Pa ym en t Term s Ref . No . [us~o119_-=:-] I 24 Nov 2025 I USSO-0026S j 24 Dec 2025 I 30 Days from Invoic e Date L32632-0 P No . Rev isi on Custom er Re f . Desc ri ptio n 900-1003-000-00 5 TL360 Searchlight 021016-0101140 Grip Hand Controller Assembly 041084 C Cable Coiled 13 way (Grip MKII) Door-To-Door Shipping SX-16 Trade-In 7.75% Sales Tax NB . All bank charges to be paid by customer/payer Payment by Electron ic Fund s Tran sfer liiiiii.il Account Nam e: l=.:....J Bank: Trakka USA lLC Wells Fargo 11135 FL-70 E Br adent on, Florida 34202 Direct Dep. Routing No: 107002192 Account No: SWIFT Code: 7195428359 WFBIUS6S Please state Tax Invoice number as r eferen ce Trakka USA LLC Re mittance Advice ri Please email remittance advice to: Carollne.Talng@trakkasystems.com De liveri es ~ All delivery communications ~-JJ shlpplng@trakkasystems.com 9 4 725 Lena Ro,1d Uni t 103 Brach:rn on, rlori d,l 3411 1 Qt y. 1 1 1 1 1 UOM Un it Price Di sc.% Each 62,130.00 Each 4 ,407.00 Each 1,201.80 Each 250.00 Each -5,000.00 Each 10,751.24 Total$ g w ww .t 1ilkk.1•Jy,t cm· .. com \. +l (</4 1 ) ~llO ':,l ',ll Z lnl o@ t r a l.k d ~y,1,•111'.cOm -=7 l o t al Am ount 62,130.00 4,407 .00 1,201.80 250 .00 ·S,000.00 10,751.24 73,740.04 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-227 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Chau Vu, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY:Jim Merid, Environmental Services Manager Subject: Approve and Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute the Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement Statement of Issue: The Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement updates and replaces the 2002 Stormwater Permit Agreement. The original agreement designated the County of Orange as the lead stormwater permittee and identified the 34 cities and the Orange County Flood Control District as co permittees under regional stormwater permits issued by the Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards. This amended agreement updates the cooperative framework and funding structure to align with current stormwater permit requirements. It also establishes a new watershed-based funding mechanism to support programs and projects required under watershed-based compliance mandates. Financial Impact: The City is required to fund its portion of the Countywide stormwater permit budget. This share is calculated using a formula based on population and jurisdictional area. Each year, the County proposes a budget for the upcoming fiscal year, which must be ratified by a majority of co-permittees (representing more than 50 percent of the total population and area). The City’s share is typically between $360,000 and $420,000 depending on permit requirements and the development and implementation of permit-required programs and projects. Additional costs incurred as a result of watershed-based programs and projects will be submitted by staff as part of the City’s annual budget preparation process. Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Amended and Restated National City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 2 350 File #:26-227 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Alternative Action(s): Do not approve or authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement and direct staff on alternative action. Analysis: The existing NPDES Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement, approved in 2002 (and originally in 1990), no longer reflects current or anticipated regulatory requirements. The updated agreement modernizes the roles and responsibilities of the County and co permittee cities. As lead permittee, the County of Orange will continue to: • Prepare the annual countywide stormwater program budget • Develop and coordinate compliance programs • Compile and submit regional compliance reports • Provide administrative support for both the Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards Co-permittee cities, including Huntington Beach, will remain responsible for implementing local compliance programs such as inspections, public education and outreach, and timely response to water quality concerns. The most significant update is the creation of a watershed-based funding structure to support projects that target pollutants specific to each watershed. This structure aligns with Santa Ana and San Diego regional permit requirements and enables collaborative development and cost sharing of multi- jurisdictional projects. Huntington Beach is located in two watersheds: • Anaheim Bay-Huntington Harbour watershed - impaired for copper, chlordane, indicator bacteria, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). • Santa Ana River watershed - currently without impairment The amended agreement provides a coordinated framework for developing and funding projects to address these pollutants within each watershed. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. Amended and Restated NPDES Stormwater Permit Agreement 2. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 2 351 352 AMENDED AND RESTATED NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT This AMENDED AND RESTATED NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT"), for purposes of identification numbered [D02-048], and which may be alternatively referred to as the "OC Stormwater Program Implementation Agreement," is entered into this day of _____ , 2026, by the County of Orange, (herein called the COUNTY), the Orange County Flood Control District (herein called DISTRICT) and the cities of Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Dana Point, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, La Habra, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park, Westminster, and Yorba Linda (herein called CITIES). The COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES may be referred to collectively as PERMITTEES or individually as PERMITTEE, COUNTY, DISTRICT, or CITY, respectively, in this AGREEMENT. RECITALS WHEREAS, the United States Congress in 1987, through the Water Quality Act, amended Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1342{p)) to require the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") to promulgate regulations for permitting stormwater discharges; and WHEREAS, EPA regulations require National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( ''NPDES"} permits for discharges from a municipal separate storm sewer system ("MS4") (herein after called MS4 permits), and further require MS4 permits to include requirements to control pollutants from stormwater discharges; and WHEREAS, in 1927, the Orange County Flood Control Act created the DISTRICT 1 353 to provide for the control of flood and stormwater and protect from damage from those flood or stormwater, the harbors, waterways, public highways, and property within the DISTRICT 1 s jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the powers granted to the DISTRICT include the authority to regulate discharges that threaten to impact its system and carry on technical and other investigations, examinations, or tests of all kinds, making measurements, collecting data, and making analyses, studies, and inspections pertaining to water supply, control of floods, use of water, water quality, nuisance, pollution, waste, and contamination of water, both within and without the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, the California State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"}, as designee of the EPA, has delegated authority to the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards-Santa Ana Region ("RWQCB-SAR") and San Diego Region ("RWQCB-SDR") (collectively, the RWQCBs) for administration of MS4 permits within the boundaries of their regions; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES are PERMITTEES under MS4 permits issued by the RWQCBs; and WHEREAS, the RWQCBs have designated the COUNTY as the Principal PERMITTEE or Principal Watershed Co-permittee, as defined in the MS4 permits; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY, the DISTRICT and the CITIES previously entered into that certain agreement entitled National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement D90-094, on December 18, 1990, which was subsequently amended on October 26, 1993 by Amendment No. 1 and then on June 25, 2002 (the December 18, 1990 Agreement as Amended by Amendment No. 1 and the June 25, 2002 amendment will be referred to collectively hereinafter as the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT), to cooperatively develop, and did thereunder develop, an integrated stormwater runoff management program with the objective of fulfilling MS4 permit requirements and improving water quality in Orange County (program 2 354 referred to herein as the "OC Storrnwater Program"); and WHEREAS, Section X of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provides that the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT may be amended by consent of a majority of the PERMITTEES which represent a majority of the percentage contributions as described in Section IV of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, continued cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT to jointly implement the OC Stormwater Program to fulfill prior, new, and potential future MS4 permit requirements, to the extent feasible, is in the best interests of the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES now desire to restate and amend the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, as reflected and set forth in this AGREEMENT. NOW, THEREFORE, the PERMITTEES do mutually agree as follows: I. FILING STATUS The COUNTY, the DISTRICT, and each CITY have filed applications for MS4 permits as PERMITTEES. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT and each CITY is a PERMITTEE under each MS4 permit to which they are subject. II. INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL GUIDELINES All applicable federal and state water quality regulations and guidelines under the Federal Clean Water Act, as presently written or as changed during the term of this AGREEMENT, are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT and take precedence over any inconsistent terms of this AGREEMENT. III. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES The responsibilities of each of the parties shall be as follows: A. The COUNTY shall be the administrator of the OC Stormwater Program and, on a cost-shared basis, perform the following functions: 1. Annual operating budgets. a. Prepare the annual operating budget ("annual operating budget"), which shall include a work plan and associated financial plan and 3 355 budget. The annual operating budget is intended to provide for all programmatic functions and associated costs of the OC Stormwater Program, as outlined in this AGREEMENT and as generally described in Section V.A. Annual operating budgets and work plans may be based on RWQCB region {i.e., Santa Ana Region versus San Diego Region). The budget year shall coincide with the COUNTY's fiscal year, July 1 -June 30. b. Consult with the Stormwater Program Representatives {as defined in Section III.C.8) when preparing annual operating budgets and major program elements therein. c. A draft of the annual operating budget may be prepared for the PERMITTIES for review by February 15 each year. Annual operating budgets shall be submitted to the PERMITTEES for consideration and approval by May 15 of each year. Individual CITY approval shall be obtained from each CITY's city manager or designee thereof by July 30 of each year. CITY manager designations for annual operating budget approval shall be provided in writing to the County and shall remain in effect until revoked in writing by the CITY's city manager. An annual operating budget shall be deemed approved and adopted for the OC Stormwater Program by affirmative responses from PERMITTEES which represent a majority (50% or greater) of both the area and population percentage contribution as calculated in accordance with Section V.A (method for calculating approval percentage referred to as ~Majority Approval"). The COUNTY and the DISTRICT shall represent one voting PERMITTEE with their percentage contribution equal to the total of the COUNTY and the DISTRICT as described in Section V.A. d. An approved and adopted annual operating budget shall not be 4 356 exceeded without prior Majority Approval of the PERMITTEES. 2. Project or watershed-specific sub-budgets. a. In coordination with the PERMITTEES, prepare project-specific and/or watershed-specific budgets and associated work plans (collectively, "sub-budget(s)") for the design of water quality projects and/or responding to RWQCB enforcement orders and/or other orders (e.g., California Water Code 13267 or 13383 orders). b. Sub-budgets shall be prepared and proposed on an as-needed basis, at the discretion of the COUNTY, or as requested by interested PERMITTEES, subject to concurrence of the COUNTY. c. Each PERMITTEE willing to participate in a sub-budget will confirm participation to the COUNTY in writing. A PERMITTEE who confirms participation in a sub-budget shall be referred to herein as "PARTICIPATING PERMITTEE ( s) . " Sub-budgets will be subject to unanimous approval by all PARTICIPATING PERMITTEES, except that where a Participating Perrnittee fails to vote to approve a proposed sub-budget, such failure shall be deemed a withdrawal from the sub-budget and the withdrawing PERMITTEE shall no longer be considered a PARTICIPATING PERMITTEE and shall have no obligation to pay for or participate in the sub-budget. d. Project elements that go beyond design (e.g., construction, operation, and maintenance) shall not be provided for in sub budgets and, instead, are subject to separate agreement between the Participating Permittees. 3. Represent the OC Stormwater Program in reviews of documents, comments, and discussions with EPA, SWRCB, and RWQCBs and/or other resource agencies regarding MS4 permit requirements and related policies, programs, and regulations. The COUNTY shall timely notify the 5 357 PERMITTEES of any decision reached during these discussions that, in the determination of the County, substantially impacts the OC Stormwater Program. 4. Implement approved annual operating budgets and sub-budgets. 5. Working in collaboration with PERMITTEES, prepare and submit regional compliance reports as the Principal PERMITTEE, as required under the MS4 permits, and/or as designated in the approved workplans. 6. Implement the regional monitoring and reporting program elements from approved workplans for the MS4 permits, including, but not limited to, tasks to monitor and measure the effectiveness of Best Management Practices ("BMPs"). This may include monitoring and modeling. 7. Obtain, as may be required by the annual operating budget and/or sub budgets approved pursuant to this AGREEMENT, professional services, including, but not limited to, scientific, engineering, environmental, economic, and/or legal consultants to provide technical assistance for the work associated with the OC Stormwater Program. This work may include, but is not limited to, the preparation of technical or economic studies, legal analysis, watershed management plans, stormwater runoff management plans, water quality improvement plans, modeling, reasonable assurance demonstrations/reasonable assurance analyses, monitoring plans, technical reports, municipal staff training activities, and the design of structural and non-structural BMPs and strategies to prevent and/or reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff. Contracts for professional services to be funded under this AGREEMENT shall be made in conformance with the COUNTY's procurement policies, and, to the extent there is no conflict, the following: a. The COUNTY shall make efforts to stagger the date of issuance of new contracts for professional services, so that PERMITTEES may 6 358 better absorb increases in consultant fee rates. b. For contracts for professional services that would require approval by the Orange County Board of Supervisors (as determined within the sole discretion of the COUNTY), one Storrnwater Program Representative for every two designees of the COUNTY shall be allowed to participate in any panel formed for the purpose of evaluating responses to Requests for Proposals or similar competitive solicitations submitted by potential consultants. Where any contract subject to this provision is to be extended beyond the initial term, the COUNTY shall request feedback from the Stormwater Program Representatives, regarding the consultant's performance, prior to executing the extension. This process shall in no way impinge upon or limit the COUNTY's discretion to enter into, amend, extend, renew, or cancel any contract for professional services for the OC Stormwater Program. c. The COUNTY shall notify the PERMITTEES of any changes in the COUNTY's procurement policies that significantly affect the thresholds for competitive procurement, scoring, or selection processes for contract services. 8. Implement a facility inspection program, as required by the MS4 permits, for MS4 facilities within the unincorporated areas of the County, at no cost to the CITIES. 9. Implement a facility inspection program, as required by the MS4 permits, for MS4 facilities on County-owned property used for COUNTY governmental purposes (i.e., property used for governmental functions) and located within a CITY, at no cost to the CITIES. For purposes of this section, the regional facility known as Dana Point Harbor shall be considered a County owned property used for governmental purposes. 7 359 a. To avoid confusion in the implementation of each party's facility inspection programs, the COUNTY shall provide a list of those facilities, buildings and properties that it owns and are located within other jurisdictions {i.e. non-unincorporated properties) that the COUNTY has decided to monitor and regulate pursuant to this Section III.A.9. The County further agrees to notify the affected PERMITTEE of changes to the status of a facility. B. The DISTRICT shall, on a cost-shared basis, except as set forth in subparagraph 2 below: 1. Perform or cause to be performed the water quality and hydrographic monitoring for compliance with MS4 permits and/or in accordance with RWQCB-approved monitoring plans and/or in the approved workplans. 2. Implement a facility inspection program, as required by the MS4 permits, for MS4 facilities located on District-owned and controlled property that is used for governmental purposes, at no cost to the CITIES. 3. Undertake or cause to be undertaken all activities required of the CITIES in Section III.C and applicable to the District. C. The CITIES, at no cost to the Counties and the District, shall: 1. Implement a facility inspection program for its MS4 facilities, as required by the MS4 permit{s) and within the jurisdictional boundaries of that CITY. 2. Submit to the COUNTY storm drain system maps and/or data describing the type and location of its MS4 facilities with periodic revisions that reflect any modifications made as a result of land development/redevelopment. If possible, information shall be submitted as geographical information system ("GIS") data. 3. Support the COUNTY in the preparation of watershed characterizations and catchment prioritization efforts, including, but not limited to, by: 8 360 a. Identifying applicable zoning and land use designations. b. Identifying areas where sources of specific pollutants are known. 4. Upon COUNTY request, review, comment on, consider approval of, and, if approved, implement regional strategies to prevent and reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff. 5. Implement an illegal discharge detection and elimination program as required by the MS4 permit(s) to which the CITY is subject. Demonstrate adequate legal authority to control discharges to its MS4 facilities as may be required by the relevant MS4 permit(s) to which the CITY is subject. 6. Provide, as requested by the COUNTY, copies of the CITY's jurisdictional reports, data, and any other information (in formats requested by the COUNTY, where such formats are reasonably available) to satisfy requirements in MS4 permits or other orders issued by a Regional Board or the State Board, to which the CITY is subject, provided the CITY has not otherwise challenged such order, and such challenge has not been resolved. 7. Participate in meetings convened by the COUNTY and respond to requests for information from the COUNTY, intended to obtain PERMITTEE input on matters related to this AGREEMENT and the implementation of the QC Stormwater Program. 8. Designate primary and secondary Stormwater Program Representative for matters related to this AGREEMENT and the implementation of the OC Stormwater Program. Designations shall be made by each CITY's city manager, or designee, in writing to the COUNTY. Each designation shall remain in effect until revoked by the CITY's city manager or designee. Stormwater Program Representatives are intended to provide subject matter input and facilitate communication between the COUNTY and each CITY. For purposes of this AGREEMENT, a Stormwater Program 9 361 IV. Representative will not be deemed to have the authority to approve annual operating budgets on behalf of a CITY, as required in Section III.A.1, unless expressly stated in the written designation provided to the COUNTY. D. In the unincorporated areas of the COUNTY, the COUNTY shall, at no cost to the CITIES or the DISTRICT, undertake or cause to be undertaken all activities required above of the CITIES in Section III.C that are not responsibilities of the DISTRICT as outlined in Section III.B. Orange County City Manager Association Engagement A. In lieu of the activities of the Technical Advisory Committee under the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, the COUNTY shall endeavor to create a working relationship with the Orange County City Manager Association {"OCCMA") or a sub-group thereof, to address issues such as MS4 permit requirements, MS4 permit compliance methods, and funding needs and strategies to facilitate regional and/or watershed-based, multi-jurisdictional project efforts. B. At its discretion, the COUNTY, in coordination with the PERMITTEES as set forth in this AGREEMENT, may implement recommendations {or parts thereof) that OCCMA may give on OC Stormwater Program matters, including, but not limited to, potential strategies for compliance with current and anticipated future MS4 permit requirements; funding strategies and options for MS4 permit compliance efforts; and OC Stormwater Program budgeting. Recommendations that would result in unbudgeted costs shall be subject to Majority Approval of the PERMITTEES pursuant to III.A.l.d. C. Under no circumstances shall this Section be interpreted as a replacement or substitute for any other responsibility of CITIES or the COUNTY under this Agreement. At the COUNTY'S discretion, the Director of OC Public Works may enter into a memorandum of understanding with OCCMA to facilitate 10 362 procedures for OCCMA engagement under this Section. Under no circumstances shall this provision be interpreted to require any written agreement between the COUNTY and OCCMA. V. PROGRAM COSTS A. Annual Operating Costs. Where not otherwise funded, the annual operating budget, including all costs of equipment, goods, COUNTY services (including, but not limited to, applicable COUNTY and COUNTY'S departmental overhead), and all professional services costs incurred by the COUNTY, and any cost of the MS4 permits, as determined by the COUNTY in its role as administrator of the OC Stormwater Program, shall be a shared cost and allocated among the COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES, and paid for as follows: Participants DISTRICT CITIES+ COUNTY Percentage Contribution 10 90 The individual percentage contributions from each CITY and the COUNTY shall be functions of their respective dry land areas and population relative to those of the entire County of Orange. Each area shall be calculated as one-half of the sum of the area and population fractions, multiplied by 90%. National forests, state parks, airports, landfills, oceans, harbors, tidal bays, and active military installations shall be excluded from area calculations (Exhibit A-1}. The contribution of the COUNTY shall be calculated from unincorporated areas and their respective populations. Should any external or alternative sources of funding become available, those funds may be directly applied to the appropriate budget(s) before the shared cost percentages are applied to the PERMITTTEES or credited to a subsequent budget. 11 363 Share in percent for jurisdiction #1= { (Xi/Xtot) + (Yi/Ytotl }/2 x (90) X area Y = population tot= total population or area 90 = total percentage excluding the DISTRICT's contribution The percentage share shall be calculated by the COUNTY from population and area data. The population data shall be the most recent annual population estimates produced by the California Department of Finance, and area is based on the most recent OC Public Works survey data available to the COUNTY. Percentage share calculations shall be updated by May of each budget year for the budget year following and shall be included in annual operating budget proposals. Annual operating budget proposals shall be prepared based on the following percentage share computation methods, as applicable, and subject to exclusions in Exhibit A-1: 1. Countywide costs will be calculated as described in the process and formula above and subject to Exhibit A-1 for the entire group of PERMITTEES. 2. Regional costs, specific to only one RWQCB permit (Santa Ana Region and San Diego Region), will be calculated based on the process and formula above for PERMITTEES within the respective permit geographic area. For PERMITTEES that have jurisdiction in both permit regions, the regional costs will be based on the land area and prorated population for that permit geographic area. 3. Sub-budgets shall be based on the PARTICIPATING PERMITTEES and their corresponding area and prorated population total within the geographic area subject to the specific sub-budget. 4. In the event of a regulatory directive issued to PERMITTEES requiring amendment of any approved budget, the COUNTY shall provide immediate 12 364 notice to the included PERMITTEES and hold discussions with respect to responding to the directive and funding the immediate response. Such budget amendments shall be subject to the Majority Approval referenced in Section III.A.1.d. 5. If at any time during a budget year costs exceed the sum of the deposits for any approved budget, and prior Majority Approval for such exceedance has been obtained, the COUNTY shall submit invoices to the involved PERMITTEES to recover the deficit. The share for each PERMITTEE shall be prorated according to the formula that was initially used to apportion budget costs. Each CITY shall pay the invoice within 45 calendar days of the billing date. 6. If at any time costs exceed the sum of the deposits for any approved budget, the COUNTY may propose a budget increase and request payment by the PERMITTEES, and PERMITTEES shall pay such amount, provided the budget increase is approved in accordance with sections III.A.1.c-d or III.A.2.c of this Agreement, as may be applicable. Until such approval is obtained and sufficient deposits received, the COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, cease carrying out approved budget components so as to limit or not incur costs in excess of deposits. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be construed as requiring PERMITTEES to approve budget increases. 7. The COUNTY shall prepare a budget year-end accounting within 120 calendar days of the end of the budget year and present the same to the involved PERMITTEES for review. If the budget year-end accounting results in the sum of the deposits exceeding costs (net of interest earnings), the excess deposits shall carry forward to reduce the obligation of the PERMITTEES for the following budget year and prorated to the CITIES consistent with the cost-sharing population and area data 13 365 calculation above. 8. The COUNTY shall invoice each CITY for its annual share of each approved budget by November 30 of each budget year. Each CITY shall pay their deposit(s) within 45 calendar days of the billing date or within 45 calendar days of November 30, whichever is later. Each CITY'S deposit(s) shall be based on their prorated share(s) of the approved budget(s), reduced for any carry forward amount identified in the prior budget year-end accounting. 9. The COUNTY shall hold each CITY's annual share of each approved budget in interest-bearing accounts and credit interest earned on each CITY's annual share against each CITY's share of the approved budget costs. The COUNTY shall maintain records regarding interest earned and credited on each CITY's annual share and provide the same to the CITIES within 120 calendar days of the end of the budget year. 10.Upon termination of this AGREEMENT, a final accounting shall be performed by the COUNTY and presented to the PERMITTEES for review. If the sum of the deposits exceeds the costs, the COUNTY shall reimburse to each CITY its prorated share of the excess, within 120 calendar days of the final accounting. VI. LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT The term of this AGREEMENT shall be indefinite, unless amended or terminated in accordance with this AGREEMENT. VII. ADDITIONAL PARTIES Any CITY which becomes incorporated after the effective date of this AGREEMENT, or requests to become a party to this AGREEMENT after previously withdrawing pursuant to Section VIII, shall be eligible to become a party to this AGREEMENT, subject to Majority Approval. In approving adding additional cities to this AGREEMENT, the PERMITTEES may 14 366 require such conditions of the added cities as they determine necessary or advantageous. The date of initiation, for determining costs for newly incorporated cities, shall be the date of incorporation. The costs for adding additional cities to this AGREEMENT and OC Stormwater Program including, but not limited to, permit and processing fees, as well as administrative costs incurred by the COUNTY and costs to reimburse the existing PERMITTEES for unreirnbursed costs related to a previous withdrawal (if applicable), shall be calculated by the COUNTY, approved by Majority Approval of the PERMITTEES and, thereafter, invoiced by the COUNTY and paid by the added city(ies) within 45 calendar days of the billing date. Monies to be reimbursed to the existing PERMITTEES shall carry forward to reduce the billings for the following budget year. VIII. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE AGREEMENT A CITY may withdraw from this AGREEMENT by providing at least 60 calendar days written notice to the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall notify the PERMITTEES within 10 business days of receipt of any withdrawal notice. Neither the COUNTY nor any PERMITTEE shall be responsible for advising the withdrawing CITY of the legal, regulatory, or programmatic effects of withdrawing, nor have any continuing responsibility to the withdrawing CITY upon the effective date of the withdrawal. The withdrawing CITY shall be solely responsible for any costs the withdrawing CITY may incur related to its withdrawal, including, but not limited to, penalties assessed by RWQCBs, and or other resource agencies (e.g., EPA, CDFW, etc.) in connection with or related to its withdrawal. In addition, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture of any deposits on hand from the withdrawing CITY, for the budget year in which the withdrawal is effective. If the effective date of a withdrawal is within 60 calendar days of the beginning of any budget year, the withdrawing CITY shall be responsible for paying its annual 15 367 share for the upcoming budget year as if it were still a PERMITTEE participating in this AGREEMENT but shall be eligible to receive a credit for any prospective carry forward amount of such annual share as may be contemplated by this AGREEMENT. The cost allocations to the remaining PERMITTEES participating in this AGREEMENT shall be recalculated and collected and/or credited as necessary in the budget year following the effective date of the withdrawal. IX. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT OR ORDER REQUIREMENTS Each PERMITTEE shall remain solely responsible for its own acts and omissions with respect to compliance with requirements of an MS4 permit or other order of the RWQCBs or SWRCB to which it may be subject, and nothing herein shall be deemed to waive, release, or transfer any such responsibility to any other PERMITTEE. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be construed as an assumption by any PERMITTEE of any liability or obligation of another PERMITTEE, whether past, present, or future. X. LEGAL ACTION/ COSTS/ ATTORNEY FEES In the event of legal action to enforce any provision of this AGREEMENT, each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, and no party shall seek to recover the same from any other party through litigation or other legal proceedings. XI. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT may be amended with Majority Approval. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT shall represent one voting PERMITTEE with their percentage contribution equal to the total of the COUNTY and the DISTRICT as described in Section V. No amendment to this AGREEMENT shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the COUNTY and the required Majority Approval of PERMITTEES. XII. NOTICES 16 368 All notices required under Section VIII shall be deemed duly given if delivered by hand (with written confirmation of receipt); via electronic mail (with confirmation of transmission); or three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. XIII. GOVERNING LAW This AGREEMENT shall be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not any way be affected or impaired hereby. XIV. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT WAIVER No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the duly authorized representative of the PERMITTEE to have waived or consented. Any consent by any PERMITTEE to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. XV. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS This AGREEMENT restates and amends the provisions in prior agreements and constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the PERMITTEES with respect to the subject matter. All prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations, and undertakings are superseded hereby. XVI. EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts, and the signed counterparts shall constitute a single instrument. The parties agree that this AGREEMENT may be executed and delivered by electronic means, including via email or electronic signature platforms (e.g., DocuSign, Adobe Sign), and that such electronic signatures shall be deemed to have the same legal 17 369 effect as original signatures. Each party agrees that electronically signed documents shall be valid, enforceable, and admissible in any legal proceeding to the same extent as a manually signed original. XVII. NO WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE AND/OR WORK PRODUCTION PROTECTION Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, nothing in this AGREEMENT shall require a party to release or provide information {including any reports, communications, data, etc.) that has been deemed by that party to be subject to the attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other relevant privilege and protection, including, but not limited to, any reports or information generated by a party's consultant that was prepared in consultation with, or at the direction of, such party's attorney or counsel of record. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit the parties hereto from entering into future agreements, including joint defense agreements, common interest agreements, or other similar agreements to share such privileged or protected information subject to the terms and conditions of such an agreement. 18 370 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on the dates opposite their respective signatures: Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM COUNTY COUNSEL ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Date: Ill Ill Ill ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT A body corporate and politic By------------------------ Chairman of the Board of Supervisors COUNTY OF ORANGE A body corporate and politic By---------------------- Chairman of the Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD By ROBIN STIELER Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California Julia Woo, Senior Deputy 19 371 20 372 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Date : By : Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM : City Clerk City Attorney 21 373 EXHIBIT A - 1 DRY LAND AREA DEDUCTED FROM JURISDICTIONS Landfills Olinda Santiago Prima Deschecha Bee Canyon Coyote Canyon State Parks Balsa Chica State Beach* Chino Hills State Park Corona Del Mar State Beach Crystal Cove State Park** Doheny State Beach Huntington State Beach San Clemente State Beach Airports Fullerton John Wayne Military facilities Joint Forces Training Base -Los Alamitos Former MCAS Tustin*** Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station**** National Forests Cleveland National Forest *Includes Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve **Includes Laguna Laurel Ecological Preserve ***Active military areas ****Includes Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge 22 Jurisdiction County County County County County Huntington Beach County Newport Beach County Dana Point Huntington Beach San Clemente Fullerton County Los Alamitos Tustin Seal Beach County Public Works Department April 7, 2026 Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement 374 BACKGROUND •Current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit agreement is outdated; Adopted in 2002 •Does not conform with pending and new stormwater permits as issued by the Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards •Amended agreement would conform with new stormwater permit requirements 375 NEED/WHY/BENEFITS •County of Orange will continue in role as lead permittee and continue to prepare annual stormwater permit implementation budget for countywide stormwater program. •Co-permittees (the 34 cities within Orange County and the Orange County Flood Control District) will implement programs as developed by the lead permittee as part of a cohesive countywide stormwater program designed to comply with regional stormwater permits. •Amended agreement would create framework for compliance with new stormwater permit requirements. •New stormwater permit requirements include a watershed-based compliance approach which identifies pollutants of concern or impairments to waterbodies within each watershed. •Amended agreement would create a framework to establish a cost-sharing mechanism for the development and implementation of watershed-based program/projects designed to address watershed-specific pollutants. 376 DETAILS •Amends current agreement to create a mechanism for watershed-based program/projects. •County will continue role as lead permittee responsible for development of compliance programs/projects and reporting to the Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards. •City will work in cooperation with other agencies within the two watershed (Anaheim Bay-Huntington Harbour, Santa Ana River) that the City resides in to develop and implement watershed-specific programs/projects under amended agreement framework. 377 FUNDING/SCHEDULE •County of Orange as the lead permittee will prepare annual shared-costs budget for the development and implementation of countywide stormwater programs. •The City’s share of the shared costs budget is between $360,000 and $410,000 per fiscal year. •Additional funding may be required based on the development and implementation of watershed-based program/projects designed to address watershed specific pollutants. Staff will include these additional costs as part of the annual budget preparation process. 378 RECOMMENDATION •Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Amended and Restated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Agreement 379 Questions? 380 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-324 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager PREPARED BY:Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager Subject: Presentation of Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Wolffhaus for Brand, Media, Press and Digital Ecosystem Comprehensive Audit, Marketing, and Assessment Services for City Council Consideration Statement of Issue: City staff is in receipt of a proposal from Wolffhaus to provide the City with a brand, media, press and digital ecosystem comprehensive audit, marketing, and assessment services. It is presented for City Council consideration. Financial Impact: Procurement of this proposed service has been budgeted and there are sufficient unencumbered appropriated funds available. Recommended Action: Review and consider the attached Professional Services Contract and attachments and direct staff accordingly. If City Council votes to approve the attached Professional Services Contract, authorize the City Manager to execute the Contract. Alternative Action(s): Provide alternative direction to staff. Analysis: Following a 30-day brand and systems audit performed by Wolffhaus, the City received an audit report which is included with this Request for Council Action as Attachment 1. The City also received a proposed scope of work from Wolffhaus to provide the City with brand, media, press and digital ecosystem comprehensive audit, marketing, and assessment services. Staff is bringing forward the information for City Council review and consideration. The proposed Professional Services Contract and Scope of Work, Exhibit A to the proposed Contract, are included as attachments to this Request for Council Action as Attachments 2 and 3. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 2 381 File #:26-324 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. Wolffhaus Huntington Beach Brand & Systems Audit and Report 2. Proposed Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Wolffhaus 3. Proposed Exhibit A, Scope of Work 4. Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 2 of 2 382 HUNTINGTON BEACH BRAND & SYSTEMS AUDIT & REPORT Draft V4. | Presented for: Travis Hopkins, City Manager, Huntington Beach, CA 383 W WOLFFHAUS An Introduction to Wolffhaus. Wolffhaus is not a traditional agency, and this report was not built through a conventional compliance-only lens. Our work comes from operating daily at the intersection of brand strategy, creative direction, media, business development, public perception, product development, and systems building for major brands, public-facing organizations, celebrities and public figures. Our approach is not conventional, and the economics of a place like Huntington Beach are not conventional. In a tourism city and identity-driven world, value is not created only through contracts and line items. It is also created through perception, visibility, cultural relevance, desirability, and third-party amplification. Those factors influence tourism demand, visitor spending, sponsorship pricing, media value, business attraction, and overall brand strength. When they are ignored simply because they are harder to quantify, cities can miss major economic opportunities hiding in plain sight. While traditional audits often focus on what is formally documented, financially reported, or procedurally required, our work is built around identifying the gaps between what an organization has, what it communicates, what it controls, and what it fails to capture. We are brought into complex environments to diagnose overlooked problems, connect disconnected issues, and find opportunities that others miss. We look for structural weaknesses, hidden inefficiencies, underused assets, outdated systems, fragmented ownership, missed revenue, and reputational blind spots — then work backward to identify what should and can be corrected, built, modernized, or brought under stronger control. Wolffhaus is a hybrid agency with capabilities that extend beyond any single traditional discipline. We do not operate like a narrow agency confined to one category. We work across creative direction, branding, communications, media, manufacturing, experiential, strategy, and operational problem-solving. That cross-functional experience allows us to evaluate situations more holistically and identify patterns that may be invisible when viewed through a single departmental or technical lens. This report reflects that perspective. It is not simply a review of isolated line items or contracts. It is a broader examination of how value is created, protected, lost, and left uncaptured across the City’s brand, assets, partnerships, systems, and public-facing infrastructure. 2 384 Huntington Beach Is Operating Without Systems to Protect or Capture the Value of One of the Most Recognizable Coastal Brands in the World Huntington Beach is not suffering from a revenue problem. It is suffering from a systems problem. Over the past several weeks, this detailed audit was conducted examining the City’s: ● Licensing agreements ● Branding and IP controls ● Outsourced marketing structures ● Revenue-sharing models ● Contract oversight ● Reporting and audit enforcement processes ● City owned assets & IP tied to brand value This report reveals a consistent pattern: The City has repeatedly undervalued its most powerful assets —its brand, its intellectual property, its physical locations, and its leverage. Across multiple departments and agreements, the City: • Accepts below-market royalty rates • Locks into long-term concession structures with weak performance triggers • Relies on self-reported revenue without mandatory deep auditing cycles • Failed to modernize expired intellectual property protections • Outsources high-margin revenue channels This report identifies: • Immediate revenue recovery opportunities • Mid-term contract restructuring pathways • Long-term institutional infrastructure improvements If properly implemented, these corrections could conservatively recover and generate: $2M–$5M+ annually across corrected systems The gap between asset value and revenue capture is substantial. This report exists to highlight that gap. 385 Huntington Beach possesses an asset most cities will never have: a globally recognized coastal brand. Rooted in decades of surf heritage, beach culture, recreation, and the classic Southern California lifestyle, this identity has shaped perceptions in media, tourism, and popular culture for generations. The California Dream. This identity carries real economic power. Many residents may not fully recognize the true economic value of this identity. A strong city brand is a form of intellectual property: it influences how people view the destination, drives visitor decisions, supports local commerce, generates tax revenue, creates employment, and contributes to overall community prosperity—all without requiring new taxes or major infrastructure projects. Cities with strong global identities routinely convert that recognition into tourism revenue, media exposure, cultural influence, and long-term economic development. When managed strategically, a city’s brand functions much like intellectual property — an asset capable of generating sustained public value. Yet despite possessing one of the most recognizable coastal identities in the world, Huntington Beach currently operates without a coordinated system designed to manage, protect, or monetize that asset. Instead, the economic value associated with the Huntington Beach identity is dispersed across fragmented initiatives, outside organizations, private operators, and media platforms that capture portions of the value without a unified strategy that benefits the city itself. Since Covid, Huntington Beach has received growing national and regional media attention centered on political debates and divisions, rather than the surf culture, suburban beach lifestyle, and community traditions/values that have long defined its worldwide appeal as Surf City USA. While no city can dictate every story written about it, when external narratives become the dominant lens through which a place is viewed, the deeper qualities that residents and visitors cherish can become less visible. Over time, this kind of shift in public perception can carry real implications for the community's image, tourism, local pride, and overall sense of unity. Reputation affects tourism behavior, media partnerships, event attraction, investment decisions, and civic pride. When a city’s narrative drifts away from the qualities that created its global appeal, the resulting damage is not merely reputational — it becomes economic. The purpose of this audit is to examine the structural systems behind Huntington Beach’s brand, its IP and assets, and identify where value is currently being lost. 386 The findings that follow document a series of gaps in how the city manages media, events, cultural programming, communications infrastructure, and brand stewardship. Taken together, these gaps represent a fundamental issue: Huntington Beach possesses extraordinary brand power, but it does not currently operate with the systems required to protect that power or convert it into sustained economic value for the community. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Core Audit Concerns 2. Immediate Corrective Opportunities 3. Core Diagnosis 4. Core Recommendations 5. Audit Methodology 6. Core Issue: Brand & Brand Voice 7. Core Issue: Merchandising & Revenue Loss 8. Missed Opportunities & Revenue: Film Commission 9. Mismanaged & Underutilized Asset: Art Center 10. Undervalued: Fourth of July Celebration 11. Overburdened & Reactive 12. Missed Opportunities – Civic Pathways 5 387 1. CORE CONCERNS Huntington Beach is currently operating under increasing fiscal pressure while simultaneously managing several public-facing assets that generate economic activity tied directly to the city’s global identity. This audit evaluates whether the City is effectively capturing the value generated by those assets and whether existing systems are structured to protect the City’s long-term economic interests. The review was driven by five core concerns: Loss of Intellectual Property (IP) Control and use as a revenue generator. Huntington Beach possesses one of the most recognizable coastal identities in the world, yet the City lacks systems designed to manage and monetize that identity as a strategic asset. Budget Deficit Pressure The City faces increasing pressure to identify sustainable revenue sources and reduce structural inefficiencies. Vendor Dependency Risk The Huntington Beach brand relies heavily on outside vendors, consultants, or organizations, creating long-term dependency, reduced internal control and inflated expenses. Revenue Leakage Multiple revenue-generating activities tied to tourism, events, media, and licensing operate without systems or oversight that ensure the City captures a proportional financial return. Fragmented Ownership Responsibility for brand-adjacent economic activity is dispersed across departments, partnerships, and outside operators without centralized coordination. 2. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE OPPORTUNITIES Huntington Beach already possesses the core asset many cities spend decades trying to build: a globally recognized identity with proven tourism, cultural, and commercial value. The issue is not whether value exists. The issue is whether the City has the systems required to capture, protect, and grow that value. 388 This audit identified several opportunities where stronger oversight, modernized agreements, clearer ownership, and better internal coordination could begin producing measurable returns. These opportunities do not depend on creating a new identity. They depend on managing existing assets with greater structure, accountability, and intent. The most immediate opportunities appear in merchandising and licensing, film and media activity, event and sponsorship monetization, and the reduction of inefficiencies tied to fragmented communications and outdated operating structures. Together, these areas represent the clearest starting points for revenue recovery, cost savings, and long-term institutional improvement. FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT Preliminary analysis indicates that several areas tied to the Huntington Beach brand are severely underperforming due to outdated agreements, fragmented ownership, limited internal systems, and weak revenue capture. Based on currently available records, benchmark comparisons, and observed structural gaps, the following ranges reflect conservative estimates of annual lost value, cost savings opportunity, and longer-term recoverable impact if corrected through modernized systems and agreements. Category Estimated Annual Opportunity Estimated 5-Year Opportunity Total 5-Year Direct + Indirect Impact Projection: $18,000,000+ in combined direct revenue opportunity, cost savings, and related economic 389 activity through improved asset management, stronger revenue capture, and system modernization. These figures are estimates based on the information currently available and are intended to illustrate the scale of the opportunity, not a guaranteed financial outcome. More precise values would require deeper financial review, contract analysis, vendor reporting validation, and implementation-stage analysis. 3. CORE DIAGNOSIS The central issue identified in this audit is not a lack of opportunity. Huntington Beach possesses valuable economic assets. What it lacks are the systems required to manage them effectively. The current structure produces five recurring conditions: Fragmented Ownership Economic drivers connected to the Huntington Beach brand operate across multiple departments and external partnerships without a unified management framework. Under-Captured Revenue Tourism activity, media exposure, events, sponsorships, and licensing opportunities generate economic value that is not consistently converted into direct revenue for the City. Limited Internal Control Over Public-Facing Brand Representation External organizations and media outlets frequently shape the public perception surrounding Huntington Beach. The City does not currently appear to operate with the level of media infrastructure, production consistency, or distribution reach needed to regularly showcase the full breadth of community activity, assets, and positive developments taking place across Huntington Beach. No Integrated Systems Huntington Beach currently lacks an integrated framework that connects tourism, media, film production, events, licensing, and cultural programming into a coordinated economic system. Overburdened & Short Handed Staff Huntington Beach currently operates with a severely limited number of staff in the creative department. In many organizations, the strategic value of creative leadership, media 390 infrastructure, and relationship-driven brand development is often underestimated, particularly when those functions are not viewed as direct contributors to revenue generation. This report also makes clear that many City staff are operating under real strain. Too much is being carried by too few people, often without the systems, staffing structure, internal coordination, or specialized support required to manage a city with assets of this scale and public visibility. In several areas, the City does not simply appear overextended. It appears structurally underbuilt. Certain roles commonly found in modern cities — including centralized creative leadership, media support, content development, and coordinated brand and communications personnel — appear limited, fragmented, or absent altogether. As a result, existing staff are left carrying responsibilities that extend well beyond what current structures are designed to support. Any recommendations in this report are intended not to add to that burden, but to reduce it. By improving revenue capture, modernizing workflows, and building durable internal systems, the City can create new capacity rather than continuing to overextend the teams already in place. Over time, the funding generated through these corrections could help support expanded staffing, internship and workforce pipelines, stronger creative and media infrastructure, and the tools needed to make City operations more effective and sustainable. 4. CORE RECOMMENDATIONS The City does not need to create new identity assets. It already possesses them. What is required is the implementation of systems that allow Huntington Beach to own, manage, and benefit from the economic value these assets produce. The recommended framework focuses on five priorities: 1. Build Internal Ownership Establish internal systems responsible for managing the Huntington Beach brand ecosystem rather than relying on fragmented external control. 2. Standardize Systems Create coordinated operational structures connecting tourism, media, events, film production, sponsorships, and licensing. 3. Capture Intellectual Property Treat the Huntington Beach identity as a strategic municipal asset with defined licensing, merchandising, and partnership frameworks. 391 4. Train and Transfer Institutional Knowledge Develop internal city capabilities related to brand IP that reduce reliance on outside consultants and vendors. 5. Eliminate Long-Term Dependency Design systems that allow Huntington Beach to operate more independently rather than relying on external organizations to manage core economic drivers. If implemented, these structural changes would allow Huntington Beach to transition from a city that just hosts economic activity tied to its identity to a city that actively manages and captures the value that identity produces. As these programs grow, they can generate enough revenue to expand internal capacity and reduce pressure on the teams currently carrying these responsibilities. 5. AUDIT METHODOLOGY The findings in this report were developed through a multi-step review process designed to evaluate both the operational structure and financial implications of programs tied to the Huntington Beach brand ecosystem. Methods used during this audit include: Public Records Review Examination of publicly available agreements, reports, contracts, and program documentation related to tourism, events, media, and other city-affiliated activities. Department Interviews Discussions with relevant city personnel and stakeholders involved in programs connected to tourism, communications, cultural programming, and economic activity tied to Huntington Beach’s public identity. Revenue Analysis Review of available financial information to identify potential gaps between economic activity occurring within the Huntington Beach ecosystem and the direct revenue captured by the City. Benchmark City Comparison Reference to structural models used by comparable municipalities to manage tourism, media, film production, events, and brand-related economic assets. Comparative Fee Structures Evaluation of how Huntington Beach’s fees, agreements, and revenue structures compare to similar cities and programs. Workflow Observation Assessment of operational workflows and departmental coordination to identify fragmentation, redundancy, or system gaps. Limitations of Available Public Data 10 392 This report relies in part on publicly available records, reported figures, interviews, and benchmark comparisons. Because complete financial, contractual, and operational data was not available in all areas at the time of review, certain findings and projections are best understood as conservative estimates based on the information currently accessible, and may require further validation through deeper internal review. THE HUNTINGTON BEACH BRAND ECOSYSTEM The Huntington Beach brand ecosystem functions best when film, tourism, events, licensing, merchandising, media, sponsorship, cultural programming, and city-owned venues are treated as connected parts of one larger system rather than separate activities operating in silos. Each area feeds the others. Film and media drive attention. Tourism converts attention into visits, spending, and broader recognition. Events create moments that generate attendance, press, sponsorship value, and merchandising opportunities. Licensing and merchandising capture revenue from the City’s identity and extend its presence into everyday life. Cultural programming strengthens authenticity, community pride, and local participation. City-owned venues and public assets serve as the stages where these experiences are activated. When aligned under a unified strategy, these categories build momentum for one another, increasing public value, strengthening the City’s identity, and creating more sustainable long-term economic return. Includes: ● Film ● Tourism ● Events ● Licensing ● Merchandising ● Media ● Sponsorship ● Cultural programming ● City owned venues & Assets ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. CORE ISSUE: BRAND & BRAND VOICE 11 393 1. Discovery Huntington Beach possesses one of the strongest municipal identities in California. The pier, surf culture, major events, coastline, and “Surf City” association generate significant national and international recognition. Third-party voices — including national media, influencers, event promoters, and independent organizations — play an outsized role in shaping public perception of the brand. However, brand management remains fragmented across tourism promotion, city communications, department-level outreach, event marketing, and media production. There is no centralized authority responsible for integrating these efforts into a unified, strategic system or effectively managing third-party portrayals. Upon interviews with department heads, current creative and public information staff is severely overburdened, limiting capacity for proactive, high-quality content production and brand stewardship. Additionally, media storage does not currently meet modern archive standards and lacks a digital asset management (DAM) system, hindering ease of access for press, internal teams, partners, and content repurposing. The City also lacks a robust network of strong, positive third-party voices in the influencer and creator economy. There are few sustained, authentic relationships with lifestyle, surf, family-travel, or coastal influencers who could consistently amplify the welcoming, fun Surf City culture to wider audiences. What exists: ● Miles of beaches, 350+ acres of parks, hundreds of events annually ● Major events drawing hundreds of thousands of visitors ● A thriving business community and restaurant scene ● Cultural institutions and historic landmarks ● Daily moments of community pride, achievement, and beauty What doesn't exist: ● A unified creative and communication vision across departments ● A professional media archive and asset management system ● Modern video production that competes with what residents see elsewhere ● A content strategy that proactively tells the city's story ● Systems to capture, organize, and distribute high-quality media ● Coordination between tourism, parks, business services, and city communications ● A YouTube channel or social media presence with large meaningful impact 2. Current Structure Tourism marketing is primarily executed through an external nonprofit entity focused on hotel performance, while City communications operate separately with limited scope, infrastructure, and distribution reach. Across departments, content is produced independently without a shared brand framework, unified messaging architecture, or centralized asset system. The result is a fragmented public-facing identity where major parts of the Huntington Beach story are being told in silos rather than through a coordinated citywide strategy. 394 In recent years, there appears to be limited collaboration and few high-impact joint initiatives between the current DMO (Destination Marketing Organization - Visit Huntington Beach) and the City that meaningfully advance broader brand objectives beyond core hotel and tourism metrics. This structural separation reduces the City’s ability to align campaigns, amplify key moments, and fully leverage the Surf City identity across tourism, culture, community, and civic pride. Without greater unification, Huntington Beach risks continuing to operate with disconnected voices, duplicated effort, and underleveraged brand assets. For that reason, the City must take a more active role in building alignment across stakeholders and owning the systems that shape its authentic voice, so the welcoming, fun, family-friendly coastal culture of Huntington Beach is consistently represented, reinforced, and protected. 3. Financial Data (Indirect Impact) While brand infrastructure does not generate direct revenue line-items, it materially impacts tourism spend, event participation, business attraction, sponsorship pricing power, merchandising performance, and film location desirability. Modern destination marketing studies consistently show that perception and digital visibility heavily influence visitor spending patterns, length of stay, and willingness to purchase branded products. The power of third-party voices amplifies both positive and negative messaging, directly affecting economic outcomes. 4. Benchmark Comparison Comparable cities with strong tourism economies maintain centralized brand governance, in-house creative direction or integrated oversight, unified digital strategies, proactive media outreach, and coordinated tourism + city messaging. These systems allow them to better harness third-party voices while protecting core brand value and aligning public perception with economic goals. Huntington Beach currently operates without this level of integration, leaving its brand identity vulnerable to external forces. 5. Structural Risk The lack of centralized brand oversight creates several critical vulnerabilities: ● Loss of control over brand identity during periods of negative attention, particularly as national media sometimes frames Huntington Beach in ways that overshadow its actual culture ● Negative or controversy-focused third-party coverage can amplify narrow or incomplete portrayals of the City, reducing visibility for the broader coastal identity, family appeal, and community strengths that support tourism, events, and civic pride. ● Limited positive amplification from influencers and creators due to few established, mutually beneficial relationships ● Missed amplification of positive community developments ● Reduced tourism yield per visitor 395 ● Weak sponsorship leverage ● Inefficient cross-department communication ● Underperformance in digital engagement ● Severe overburdening of creative staff, constraining proactive storytelling and response capabilities ● Inadequate modern media archiving and access, slowing content reuse, press support, and overall efficiency ● Businesses and investors deterred by persistent negative brand narrative, perceiving higher risk or reputational concerns when deciding where to open, expand, or host events — despite the City’s world-class location and infrastructure ● Potential long-term economic chilling effect, as negative or polarized media coverage discourages corporate partnerships, film productions, retail development, and tourism-related investment that would otherwise flow to a strong, positive brand like Huntington Beach. For a city with Huntington Beach’s level of public visibility, fragmented communications and brand systems create avoidable risk. In a fast-moving media environment, perception can shift quickly, and without coordinated infrastructure the City is less equipped to reinforce the identity that supports tourism, investment, partnerships, and long-term economic value. 6. Revenue Gap Brand fragmentation, weak control over brand identity, and heavy reliance on third-party voices contribute to measurable economic losses. Without a more professional and coordinated media, content, and storytelling strategy, the City is unlikely to convert the full strength of its identity into its highest potential economic return across tourism, sponsorships, film activity, merchandising, and related categories. This results in lower per-visitor spending, under-monetized opportunities in merchandising and licensing, reduced film and event sponsorship pricing power, and missed ancillary revenue from cultural assets and branded experiences and fewer new businesses opening in the city. Conservative annual lost opportunity due to ineffective brand and media execution: $1.1 million – $2.25 million in direct, quantifiable revenue (merchandising, film, parade sponsorships, Art Center commissions, etc.) — with the true economic and community impact far larger and largely immeasurable, as it compounds through reduced tourism yield, deterred business investment, diminished national perception, and lost cultural relevance that erodes the Surf City brand’s long-term value every year we fail to act. Brand infrastructure and content quality directly influence revenue conversion rates across multiple categories. When third parties dominate the voice and the City lacks professional, engaging media capabilities, it captures significantly less value than the underlying asset justifies. 7. Corrective Path 396 Immediate: ● Establish centralized brand oversight authority with clear responsibility for brand identity strategy and third-party engagement ● Conduct full communication infrastructure audit ● Define unified messaging architecture that protects core Surf City identity Mid-Term: ● Implement modern media archive and digital asset management (DAM) system for secure, searchable storage and easy access ● Create collaborative cross-department creative content calendar & execution ● Align tourism and city messaging through structured coordination, including proactive media response protocols ● Launch staff training program focused on effective, engaging content creation, digital storytelling, video production, and brand-aligned messaging ● Develop internship structure to support overburdened creative teams, provide fresh capacity, and build talent pipeline ● Initiate targeted influencer and creator outreach program to build authentic, positive third-party relationships and opportunities for collaboration Long-Term: ● Develop in-house creative direction capacity with professional media planning and execution ● Build proactive press engagement framework and third-party amplification strategy ● Establish performance metrics tied to economic impact, brand sentiment, content engagement rates, and revenue capture ● Leverage current brand assets (e.g., merchandising, licensing, film, events) to generate additional revenue streams, directly bolstering staffing and resources in communications and creative departments Additional Context: DMO Reliance & Scope Over the past decade, Visit Huntington Beach (VHB) has gradually positioned itself as the default point of contact for much of the City’s broader destination brand, marketing narrative, visitor experience strategy, and creative initiatives — responsibilities that extend well beyond its core mandate of lodging-focused promotion. VHB’s mission statements, annual reports, and public materials consistently claim ownership over “inspirational destination marketing,” “brand management,” and “economic vitality” and even public relations and crisis communication. Based on our research and interviews, the City appears to have relied heavily on VHB for event amplification, media coordination, content creation, and broader brand-related functions, areas outside the scope of the city’s arrangement and whose board composition appears to remain heavily weighted toward hotel industry interests. 397 This drift has created an unintended over-reliance. People and partners now automatically turn to VHB when they want to do anything creative or marketing-related with the City. While this may have seemed convenient, or even standard based on how some DMO’s operate, VHB’s performance in visitor marketing and broader destination promotion has been largely standard rather than standout, with recent campaigns for hotels and events often feeling outdated and out of touch with current industry trends. More importantly, the City has no proactive relationships with key promoters, event producers, film commissioners, and other partners of its own, because those connections have quietly shifted to VHB over the past several years — an organization not technically responsible or structured to manage them for the city. The result is fragmented strategy, weaker accountability, and missed opportunities across the board. The Surf City brand deserves clearer governance, stronger city-led direction, and balanced stakeholder input rather than defaulting to a model that has expanded beyond its original scope. Suggested Solutions If the City chooses to continue outsourcing some of these functions, several structural improvements could restore alignment and accountability: ● Stronger, clearly defined ownership roles and lines of responsibility in the management agreement. ● A more collaborative board structure with meaningful council oversight and regular reporting requirements. ● Inclusion of internal city stakeholders on the board to ensure broader community and departmental representation. ● Adoption of an operational model closer to Visit Newport Beach’s, where the DMO is responsible for the larger marketing of the entire city — not just lodging — through a formal city contract with integrated public-private governance, shared priorities, direct accountability to the full city organization, and built-in collaboration across stakeholders. This structure could also ease burdens and responsibility on internal city staff but comes with its own set of risks as well. Structure of the Visit Newport Beach Model and Potential Benefits Visit Newport Beach operates as a city-contracted DMO within the broader Newport Beach & Company framework, funded primarily through TOT but governed under a formal agreement with the City of Newport Beach. This structure gives the DMO clear responsibility for overall city-wide destination marketing, brand management, visitor experience development, event promotion, and economic vitality initiatives — not just hotel performance. Governance includes a TBID board, an executive committee, and direct city oversight through ordinances and shared priorities, ensuring collaboration with the full range of stakeholders (residents, businesses, cultural organizations, and city departments) rather than a narrow lodging focus. 398 For Huntington Beach, adopting a similar model would allow the DMO to focus on comprehensive brand marketing and city-wide destination promotion with strong built-in accountability and stakeholder collaboration. This structure would clearly define roles, maintain proactive city relationships with promoters and partners, and align marketing efforts more closely with the entire community’s needs — delivering better results for the Surf City brand while keeping governance transparent and balanced. Additional Context: Recent Press and Media Patterns In recent years, Huntington Beach has received a growing volume of national and regional media attention centered on political conflict and controversy rather than the broader coastal lifestyle, surf heritage, community traditions, and quality of life that have long shaped its public identity. While no city can control every headline, sustained imbalance in external coverage can distort public perception over time and reduce visibility for the attributes that have historically driven tourism, civic pride, and broader brand appeal. In a media environment where controversy often receives disproportionate attention, cities with strong public identities must work more intentionally to ensure their broader strengths remain visible. For Huntington Beach, that means a more proactive and coordinated approach to communications, third-party engagement, and brand storytelling so that public perception is not shaped disproportionately by isolated controversies. As part of this audit, a representative sample of more than 100 relevant news articles and reports from Google News, major California outlets, and local sources was reviewed to better understand the dominant themes shaping public perception of Huntington Beach. No independent third-party media monitoring study specific to Huntington Beach was identified during this review. Based on this sample, the majority of higher-visibility coverage appeared to be political or controversy-oriented, while positive or lifestyle-driven coverage was present but materially less prominent in overall volume and reach. ● Political coverage: Approximately 75–85% of all press mentions are political or controversy-focused. ● Negative or critical tone: Approximately 60–70% of stories carry a negative or critical tone. Even neutral local stories are often overshadowed by controversy. Positive or neutral coverage makes up only 20–30% and rarely goes national. Positive coverage relating to Huntington Beach’s businesses, beach culture, community events, and everyday quality of life exists, but appears materially less prominent than controversy-driven coverage in overall visibility and distribution. How This Affects the City Brand 17 399 This heavy political tilt has shifted national and regional perception of Huntington Beach away from “Surf City USA” — the fun, welcoming, family-friendly coastal icon — and toward a polarized political flashpoint. When controversy becomes the dominant frame through which a city is seen, it can overshadow the qualities that historically attracted visitors, businesses, families, event partners, and broader cultural interest. The constant focus on controversy creates a feedback loop: it drives more political coverage while crowding out stories about life here in HB and community strengths that actually reflect the vast majority of residents’ experience. The result is diminished tourism appeal, weaker third-party advocacy, and missed opportunities to showcase the full value of the Huntington Beach identity. What We Need Moving Forward The City would benefit from a more intentional and coordinated communications strategy that increases the visibility of authentic, positive, and community-centered stories. The goal is not to manufacture perception, but to better represent the full reality of Huntington Beach by amplifying the people, places, traditions, and everyday experiences that continue to define its long-term appeal. Stronger coordination, better media infrastructure, and more proactive third-party engagement would help restore balance and improve the City’s ability to shape how its identity is understood. 7. CORE ISSUE: MERCHANDISING & REVENUE LOSS 1. Discovery Huntington Beach possesses one of the most powerful and valuable municipal brands in the world through its pier, surf culture, major events, coastline, and decades of national and international recognition. The global surfing apparel and accessories market is currently valued at $10.37 billion and is projected to exceed $15 billion by 2033. Individual major surf brands generate hundreds of millions in annual revenue. Quiksilver, Hurley, Billabong, Volcom, Roxy, Ripcurl, RVCA, and Reef are the major players in the market and Huntington Beach should rightfully have a seat at that table. Huntington Beach captures virtually none of the economic value its name and reputation should generate through retail sales, licensing and partnerships. We have the visibility, authenticity, heritage, and audience to claim a meaningful share, yet the category remains almost entirely untapped. By way of scale only, even a very small share of a multi-billion-dollar surf and coastal lifestyle market would translate into substantial retail volume. For example, 0.25% of that broader market would equate to approximately $27.5 million in gross annual retail sales. That figure is not presented as a short-term municipal revenue 400 forecast, but as an illustration of how large the surrounding market is relative to the City’s current level of participation. 2. Current Structure Merchandising and licensing are currently locked into a single outdated third-party agreement tied to the Surf City Store on the Pier, featuring a severely undervalued 5% royalty rate on branded merchandise, well below common industry standards, extremely low pier lease rent of $950 per month for a high-traffic prime location, no minimum royalty guarantees, and limited audit and verification protections. The referenced servicemark (“Surf City, Huntington Beach”) is dead/cancelled (USPTO Reg. No. 74/350/258, lapsed 2005), weakening enforceability. The website for direct consumer orders is hard to find, has a very limited selection, little to no active marketing or promotion, and product designs that have remained largely stagnant for years. Seasonal collections are not regularly introduced, and the overall program appears commercially underdeveloped and largely invisible relative to the millions of visitors who come to Huntington Beach each year. Beyond the pier store, our research indicates widespread sales of Huntington Beach-branded apparel and products across the city, from liquor stores and small shops to major retail outlets, some openly selling HB-branded apparel with no licensing agreement and zero revenue return to the City. All of this unauthorized activity likely accounts for millions of dollars in annual sales that are completely lost to the city. 3. Financial Data (Indirect Impact) The current program generates very limited direct revenue for the City relative to the strength of the Huntington Beach brand. Financial evidence from 2024–2025 Surf City Store reports shows total reported sales of $1,515,215.94, with the City receiving only $75,760.81 in royalties under the current 5% structure. Average monthly sales were approximately $63,134, while the average monthly return to the City was approximately $3,157. This gap is significant because the value behind Huntington Beach-branded merchandise was built over decades through the identity, reputation, and cultural contributions of the community itself. Yet under the current structure, much of that value does not appear to be returning to the City in a meaningful way. From July through December 2025, more than $400,000 in reported sales appears to have generated only approximately $18,000 in revenue to the City. 4. Benchmark Comparison Other major coastal cities manage their brands far more aggressively. The iconic “I ❤NY” is reported to generate $30 million annually in revenue. Comparable coastal destinations with active, professionally managed licensing programs (including Santa Monica, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Miami Beach) generate $1 million to over $5 million per year in direct licensing and merchandise revenue through modern e-commerce platforms, regularly updated product lines, aggressive digital marketing, and reasonable royalty structures. 401 These cities capture a meaningful share through official branded merchandise. Huntington Beach, with stronger global surf and coastal recognition than most peers, receives virtually nothing in comparison. 5. Structural Risk The current third-party deal — combined with rampant unlicensed sales — is a raw, one-sided arrangement that is actively costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands (likely millions) of dollars every single year: ● A 5% royalty rate that hands the vast majority of profits to outside operators while the City gets almost nothing ● Revenue that belongs to the generations of Huntington Beach residents who built this brand is instead being pocketed by third parties ● Complete absence of any marketing or promotion — consumers who want official Huntington Beach merchandise literally cannot find it ● The absence of an official website, online store, or meaningful direct-to-consumer pathway is a major structural gap for a destination brand of this caliber. ● Weak audit rights, weak oversight, limited minimum protections, and reliance on outside reporting create avoidable exposure and potential for underreporting where the City should be demanding greater transparency and accountability. ● Severely undermarket pier space lease - A prime high traffic retail location appears to be operating under terms that do not reflect the value of the site or the traffic associated with it. ● Product execution appears stagnant, with limited evidence of the kind of ongoing design development, seasonal refreshes, and quality control expected in the $10+ billion surf market ● Widespread unlicensed sales at 50+ locations across the city, including major retailers here in the city, generating large amounts in unauthorized (and in some cases un-taxed) revenue with zero return to residents ● Missed retail partnerships, sponsorships, and brand extensions that other major destination cities are actively cashing in on That combination of weak economics, weak oversight, weak enforcement, and weak modern retail infrastructure does not reflect the standard that should apply to an asset of this magnitude. 6. Revenue Gap With $580 million (per VHB) in annual direct visitor spending, shopping and souvenirs typically account for 12-18% — representing a massive revenue opportunity. A professionally managed merchandising program should capture a meaningful share through official branded products. Instead, due to the outdated third-party agreement, complete lack of marketing, absence of any substantial online sales platform, stagnant product designs, rock-bottom terms, and the 20 402 explosion of unlicensed sales across multiple locations, the City is failing to capture even a fraction of this opportunity. Conservative annual lost opportunity due to ineffective merchandising and licensing: $500,000 – $1 million (with potential for $750,000 – $2 million net annually under internalized operations on $1M+ sales, plus millions more once unlicensed sales are brought under control and the program is built and structured. When outsiders control licensing under terrible terms and the City allows widespread unauthorized sales, it captures a tiny fraction of the value its brand actually justifies — value built by local generations and now being handed away for almost nothing. 7. Corrective Path Existing unlicensed sales should not be treated as a reason to avoid correction. They should be treated as proof that real demand exists and that the City has waited too long to bring this category under proper control. Rather than leading with immediate enforcement, the City should offer a short structured transition period for businesses that currently sell unlicensed HB merchandise and want to begin selling authentic merchandise through legitimate channels, including wholesale pricing, collaboration opportunities, and access to stronger official product collections. This approach allows the City to reestablish control, capture appropriate value, and bring willing retailers into a better system moving forward. Immediate ● Establish clear centralized authority for merchandising and licensing strategy ● Conduct a full audit of the existing third-party structure, including royalty terms, lease economics, sales history, audit rights. ● Finalize current trademark and IP protection work and define stronger product and licensing standards ● Identify the full scope of unauthorized, unlicensed, or weakly controlled retail activity tied to Huntington Beach branding Mid-Term ● Renegotiate, restructure, or replace the current underperforming arrangement where legally and operationally appropriate ● Launch an official City-controlled or City-governed e-commerce platform and direct-to-consumer sales system ● Develop stronger product lines aligned with current surf, coastal, and lifestyle demand ● Implement active marketing, authentication, and retail partnership strategies ● Establish a practical enforcement pathway for unauthorized or uncompensated commercial use of City brand assets Long-Term 21 403 ● Build internal licensing, merchandising, and creative capability sufficient to manage the category professionally ● Implement royalty and partnership structures with meaningful accountability, audit rights, and performance standards ● Create measurable performance benchmarks tied to direct revenue, sales growth, distribution reach, and brand protection ● Reinvest a portion of new merchandising revenue into the communications, creative, and operational infrastructure required to sustain and protect the broader Huntington Beach brand Key U.S. Tourism Expenditure Data (Shopping/Souvenirs): ● Overseas Tourists (2024): 18% of total spending, amounting to about $325 per trip. ● North American Tourists (2024): 12.8% of total spending, about $152 per trip. ● General Travelers: 25% of travelers list purchasing souvenirs as a financial priority. ● Spending Amount: Vacationers often spend between $50 and $200+ on merchandise and gifts per trip. Context on Spending Habits: ● Top Categories: Shopping is consistently ranked behind accommodation (30-35%) and food/beverage (20-21%). ● Buyer Behavior: Roughly 65% of Americans bring back souvenirs, with 44% gifting to family and 39% for themselves. Progress Already Underway: Strengthening Trademark and IP Protections At the forefront of Huntington Beach's globally recognized coastal identity are its logos and core visual marks—the instantly recognizable symbols that represent the city in merchandise, events, partnerships, and media worldwide. For years, our main city logo has remained unprotected or inadequately registered, leaving it vulnerable to unauthorized use, dilution, and lost licensing opportunities. This long standing gap has allowed value to slip away quietly, even as the city's brand continues to carry significant cultural and economic weight. During the audit, we conducted a deep review of all of the city's trademarks and intellectual property. We found that the city's original iconic HB logo mark was not properly registered or protected. Staff explained that past attempts years ago were abandoned after being told registration might not be possible due to widespread use by others. The matter was left unresolved. We took a fresh approach: identified the specific lapses (expired filings, incomplete applications, missed opportunities), the original curation process, and worked directly with the city's legal and 404 IP team. We gathered documentation, addressed the issues, and successfully restarted the protection process. Steps are now actively in progress to secure stronger registrations for these core brand elements—helping prevent unauthorized use, reduce dilution, and enable better enforcement and monetization. This is a clear example of what focused effort can accomplish: uncovering long-standing gaps and closing them through internal collaboration—no major obstacles, just persistence. This early progress shows that many audit findings are fixable with similar diligence. Securing foundational IP like logos is a critical first step toward reclaiming control over the city's brand value and stopping leakage in licensing and merchandising. Building on this momentum will help shift from a reactive to a proactive approach, delivering lasting benefits for the community. Additional opportunities: Beyond just apparel: The City is overlooking an easy, low-overhead revenue channel inside facilities it already owns and operates. The Art Center, libraries, and other public-facing spaces should function not just as civic amenities, but as retail touchpoints for Huntington Beach’s brand and creative identity. A kiosk-based merchandising system would allow visitors to purchase City-branded goods, art prints, photography, and other curated products onsite and have them shipped directly to their homes. That approach dramatically reduces risk,storage, staffing, and operational friction while expanding what the City can monetize. Huntington Beach has no shortage of talented local artists and world-class surf and lifestyle photographers whose work could be featured through this system. Under a revenue-share model, the City would participate in each sale while artists retain the balance, creating a program that supports both municipal revenue and the local creative economy. With minimal setup and management costs, these kiosks could become a meaningful tourism revenue tool while reinforcing the culture and visual identity that make Huntington Beach valuable in the first place. 8. MISSED OPPORTUNITIES & REVENUE: FILM COMMISSION 1. Discovery 405 Huntington Beach stands out as one of Southern California’s most versatile and underutilized filming destinations. Its iconic pier, expansive beaches, modern Civic Center, Equestrian Center, and Sports Complex, Pacific City, and variety of community housing styles give production companies a rare mix of coastal beauty and diverse inland locations that few competitors can match. Beyond direct revenue, successful film and television production delivers powerful cultural relevance, high-value earned media, authentic third-party voice amplification, and increased off-season tourism that can extend visitor stays and spending throughout the year. 2. Current Structure Film permitting is currently managed through a basic, decentralized process with modest fees and limited dedicated support that producers are used to. The program lacks proactive marketing, a streamlined one-stop shop experience, and a professional location library. While basic beach and pier permitting exists, the City currently does not actively promote its full range of unique assets or position itself as a competitive filming destination near Los Angeles. 3. Financial Data (Indirect Impact) Direct permit and location fees represent the most tangible and reliable form of revenue from film activity. Currently, these direct returns remain modest. At the same time, the broader economic impact of film production is enormous and can reach hundreds of millions of dollars for cities that actively pursue it. Industry data shows the average location shoot day generates $50,000-$670,000 in local spending and supports hundreds of jobs, while major productions can exceed $1.3 million per day in direct local economic activity. These dollars flow into hotels, restaurants, transportation, retail, and local suppliers — especially valuable during off-season months — while also creating lasting cultural relevance, earned media exposure, and positive third-party amplification that drives future tourism and visitation. 4. Benchmark Comparison Several peer cities have built professional film commissions that generate both meaningful direct revenue and massive economic impact. San Francisco’s Film SF collected $127,000 in direct permit fees (This does not include staffing, or location use or any other fees) in FY 2024-25 while driving $17.5 million in estimated direct production spending. Fort Worth’s Film Commission has generated over $800 million in cumulative economic impact since 2016 through focused outreach. Nashville’s broader arts, culture, and creativity economy has been reported by Metro planning materials at approximately $13 billion annually, and a single major production — ‘9-1-1: Nashville’ — is expected to generate more than $50 million in local economic impact. Comparable coastal destinations like Long Beach, Los Angeles, and Miami Beach maintain dedicated offices with competitive fees, active marketing, and 406 streamlined processes that attract productions and deliver both direct fees and hundreds of millions in broader economic benefits. 5. Structural Gaps The current structure presents several opportunities for improvement that would help the City fully realize its potential: ● Absence of a dedicated Film Commission or centralized one-stop permitting office ● Limited relationships, marketing and outreach to productions and location scouts ● Under-promotion of the City’s diverse non-beach assets (Civic Center, Equestrian Center, Pacific City, Sports Complex, etc) ● Multi-department coordination that can slow response times (including the current requirement that applicants obtain a separate business license before even submitting a film permit application — a step that is not typical in peer cities and production process) ● No proactive strategy to highlight speed, efficiency, and location diversity that could undercut larger jurisdictions These gaps mean Huntington Beach is not yet fully capitalizing on productions that could deliver direct revenue, economic value and valuable earned media exposure. 6. Revenue Gap Huntington Beach has the locations and proximity to Los Angeles to compete effectively — particularly by offering faster permitting turnaround and greater location diversity than many parts of LA. Professional programs in comparable destinations routinely generate $125,000 to several million in annual direct revenue, while driving tens to hundreds of millions in broader economic impact (e.g., Fort Worth’s ~$800M cumulative since 2016, San Francisco’s $17.5M direct spending in one year). Currently, due to the absence of a dedicated Film Commission, limited marketing, outdated processes, and lack of streamlined permitting, the City is not capturing its full potential in either direct revenue or indirect benefits, or economic impact. Conservative annual lost opportunity due to under-developed film permitting: $100,000 – $1 million + in direct revenue (plus multi-million-dollar economic impact, earned media value, and off-season tourism lift once the program scales). 7. Corrective Path Immediate: ● Establish a centralized Film Commission with clear responsibility for permitting, marketing, and revenue strategy ● Conduct a full review of current fees, processes, and past production inquiries ● Develop streamlined one-stop permitting guidelines 407 Mid-Term: ● Launch a dedicated Film Commission with fast-track permitting designed to undercut Los Angeles on speed and ease (target 48-72 hour turnaround) ● Create a professional location library and comprehensive production resource book for producers, including local workforce talent, hotels, parking, and other production resources ● Update fees to competitive levels with improved tracking ● Initiate active outreach to location managers and production companies (leveraging current staff to grow the program with minimal additional stress until revenue supports dedicated staffing) Long-Term: ● Build professional in-house location management and creative partnership capabilities ● Establish a high-performance permitting framework focused on both direct revenue and earned media outcomes ● Set measurable goals tied to permit revenue, production days, and off-season tourism impact ● Direct new film revenue into communications, creative departments, and public asset maintenance Source Data ● City of Huntington Beach Film, Video and Still Photography Permit Fees (2024) ● Film SF Annual Impact Report FY 2024-25 ($127,000 permit fees, $17.5M direct spending) ● California Production Coalition: average location shoot adds $670,000/day and 1,500 jobs ● Fort Worth Film Commission economic impact reports (2016–2025 data showing nearly $800 million cumulative impact, recent annual ~$1B) ● Tennessee Entertainment Commission 2025 Economic Impact Report ($8.2 billion in entertainment production clusters for 2024, including film/TV) ● FilmLA & peer city reports (2024–2025) ● Film Santa Monica, Long Beach, Miami Beach, Fort Worth, and Nashville Film Commission data (public documents, 2025–2026) ● UNWTO and industry analyses on direct film revenue vs. earned media, tourism, and economic multipliers ● Internal City tracking of production activity (2023–2025) 9. MISMANAGED & UNDERUTILIZED ASSET: ART CENTER 1. Discovery Huntington Beach owns and operates a dedicated Art Center in a high-visibility location, supported by decades of community investment, public support, and taxpayer funding. On paper, it offers classes, camps, events, exhibitions, and artist programs that should contribute to the City’s creative life and welcoming coastal identity. In practice, however, the Center appears to remain relatively unknown not only regionally and nationally, but within Huntington Beach itself. Public awareness, foot traffic, participation, and overall utilization appear limited. Much of the programming feels more insular than open and inviting, and does not clearly reinforce Huntington Beach’s identity as a fun, welcoming, family-friendly coastal destination. 408 The issue is not that the Art Center lacks value opportunity. The issue is that much of that value is not fully reaching the community. There appears to be limited general awareness among residents about what is happening there, who it serves, and why it matters. Its programs, exhibitions, and activities do not appear to generate the level of participation, excitement, cultural relevance, or civic benefit that comparable city-run arts facilities often provide. As a result, an asset that should be helping elevate local artists, expand community engagement, and strengthen Huntington Beach’s creative identity is operating below its potential. The opportunity is not simply financial, but civic and cultural: to make the Art Center more visible, more welcoming, more connected to residents, and more valuable to the artists and audiences it should be serving. Many exhibitions also appear to receive little meaningful press attention or lasting public documentation. In many cases, once a show closes, there is little to no accessible visual archive, photo gallery, or digital record that allows residents, visitors, collectors, or supporters to see what was exhibited. That limits the public reach of the work, reduces long-tail exposure for participating artists, and reflects a broader weakness in the City’s PR, content capture, and cultural documentation efforts. A city-run gallery should not only host exhibitions well in the moment, but also preserve and extend their value through visibility, promotion, and accessible online archives for those who could not attend in person or wish to revisit the work after the exhibition has ended. In addition, many exhibitions appear to lack supporting print, merchandise, or take-home purchase opportunities tied to the show itself. That creates a missed opportunity both for participating artists, who lose additional exposure and sales potential, and for the City, which loses a practical and low-friction revenue capture channel connected directly to its own cultural programming. 2. Current Structure The Art Center seems to operate with little to no integrated revenue strategy beyond the offered community art classes. Programming focuses almost exclusively on small shows and regional artists. There is no gallery sales commission program, no on-site or online retail/merchandise operation, no market-rate facility rentals, and no formal sponsorship or branded partnership framework. Oversight is split between City departments and external nonprofit/Foundation support, with limited coordination or performance accountability tied to financial return or community impact and engagement. 3. Financial Data (Indirect Impact) The City fully subsidizes operations. FY 25-26 Revised Expenditures ● Admin (Personnel + Operating): $437,399 ● Classes (Personnel + Operating): $97,856 ● Total City Cost: $535,255 27 409 Revenues (Full-Year Projection Based on YTD) ● Class/Camp fees: ~$83,451–$107,708 (explicitly covers only instructor/program costs) ● Memberships: ~$2,725 ● Artist Council fees: ~$6,407 ● Rentals & Special Events: ~$5,240 ● Total Revenue: ~$97,823–$114,178 Net Annual Subsidy to the Art Center: $421,000 – $437,000 in taxpayer dollars. The revenue generated by activities at this City-owned facility rightfully belongs, at least in part, to the residents who built and maintain the brand and infrastructure — yet virtually none returns to the General Fund. 4. Benchmark Comparison Comparable coastal-city cultural facilities treat their centers as revenue-generating assets that actively elevate both the institution and local artists. Laguna Art Museum generated $3.27 million in total revenue in 2024 through gallery/exhibition sales and commissions. Long Beach Museum of Art Foundation reported $2.17 million in revenue in 2024. These and other peer institutions routinely feature nationally and internationally renowned artists alongside local talent, capturing 20–50% commissions while dramatically increasing the market value of regional artists through association and exposure. Huntington Beach does not participate in or compete with major regional events such as Newport Beach’s art festivals or Laguna Beach’s Festival of the Arts, missing out on shared tourism and cross-promotion that other cities actively leverage. 5. Structural Gaps The current model creates clear vulnerabilities: ● Heavy General Fund subsidy with no requirement for break-even or revenue-sharing ● Programming that feels exclusionary and insular, focusing almost exclusively on small shows and regional artists, rendering the Center incapable of curating exhibitions with nationally or internationally renowned artists ● Complete absence of gallery sales commissions, on-site city branded retail, or branded art merchandise ● Minimal facility rental income and no corporate/private event strategy ● No collaboration with hotels or other local partners to build community experiences around major festivals, and no participation in or alongside Newport or Laguna events ● Missed opportunities to elevate local artists’ value by placing their work beside major names — an approach proven to deliver immeasurable uplift in artist prestige, sales, and tourism draw 410 These gaps mean the City is subsidizing cultural programming while capturing almost none of the economic upside created by its own brand and location and the majority of the community never participates in the value it generates. 6. Revenue Gap With hundreds of thousands of annual visitors and a globally recognized coastal identity, the Art Center should at minimum break even and ideally generate net revenue. Comparable facilities routinely produce $200,000 – $600,000+ in direct annual revenue (and in stronger cases millions) through commissions, rentals, events, and retail. Instead, Huntington Beach is subsidizing the operation to the tune of $421,000 – $437,000 (this number not including maintenance or utilities cost) per year with virtually no return. This represents a clear structural failure to monetize a public asset tied to the City’s brand and to compete for the tourism and cultural value flowing to neighboring cities’ festivals. Conservative annual lost opportunity / subsidy reduction potential: $400,000 – $750,000 (through commissions, rentals, retail/merch, major-artist exhibitions, festival collaboration, and broader community outreach — turning the current subsidy into breakeven or positive contribution within 2–3 years). 7. Corrective Path The Art Center is a meaningful civic asset. The challenge is making sure its value is more visible, more accessible, and more fully delivered to the artists, residents and visitors it should be serving. That begins with increasing public awareness, improving the accessibility and visibility of programming, and more intentionally positioning the Center as a community-serving and regionally / nationally recognized cultural hub rather than a facility known only to a narrow audience. The goal should be to create a stronger bridge between the Art Center, local artists, residents, and tourists. With the right structure and attention, the Art Center can at least break even on its operating costs as well as become a more visible source of community pride, a stronger platform for Huntington Beach artists, and a more valuable cultural asset for the residents. Immediate: ● Establish centralized oversight with clear revenue targets, performance metrics, and community-engagement goals ● Conduct a full audit of operations, agreements, revenue opportunities, and current public awareness/perception ● Define brand standards for any future partnerships, programs or shows. Mid-Term: 29 411 ● Implement a professional gallery/exhibition commission program and actively curate shows featuring nationally/internationally renowned artists alongside local talent ● implement a consistent system for professionally photographing, cataloging, and archiving every exhibition, ensuring that each show remains accessible online as a lasting public resource and an ongoing source of visibility for participating artists. ● Launch on-site and online retail/merchandise tied to the Huntington Beach brand ● Introduce and promote market-rate facility rentals and corporate/private event packages ● Develop sponsorship and Artist Council revenue-sharing framework ● Audit & Performance overhaul of how the HBAC oversight currently functions ● Begin collaboration with hotels and participation alongside Newport and Laguna festivals to build joint community experiences ● Mentorship programs and classes between renowned artists and local artists. Long-Term: ● Build integrated creative and merchandising capacity (leveraging existing staff and internships) ● Establish performance metrics tied to direct revenue, subsidy reduction, artist elevation, tourism impact, and community utilization/awareness ● Direct all new Art Center revenue back into cultural programming and General Fund support so residents finally benefit from the asset they fund Sources - City of Huntington Beach – General Fund Art Center Accounts (FY 24/25 Actuals & FY 25-26 Revised/YTD, provided March 2026) - Laguna Art Museum – ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (FY 2024 revenue $3.27M) - Long Beach Museum of Art Foundation – ProPublica / CauseIQ (FY 2024 revenue $2.17M) - Santa Monica FY 2025-27 Adopted Biennial Budget (Recreation & Arts Department context) - Industry benchmarks: Licensing International (LIMA) and American Alliance of Museums reports on gallery commission rates (20–50%) and cultural facility earned revenue models - Laguna Beach Pageant of the Masters and Newport Beach arts festival public attendance/economic reports (2024–2025) 10. UNDERVALUED: FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION 1. Discovery Huntington Beach has built one of the largest Independence Day celebrations in the country, consistently drawing 300,000–500,000 attendees and earning a regional television partner and coverage during the parade event. We’ve done an excellent job attracting that scale of crowd and showcasing our patriotic, family-friendly Surf City identity. What we haven’t done as well is capitalize on the opportunity this creates. The focus of this section is not to be a profit generator for the city, but to secure more funding that elevates the parade’s production quality and delivers a richer, more memorable experience for residents, families, and visitors, this in turn, will grow our earned media, and event prestige. 412 Right now the event lacks many of the high-impact elements that would make it truly special: elaborate floats, celebrity appearances, large helium balloons, live drone streaming of our fireworks show for those who can’t attend and larger community activation zones and other events that could bridge the morning parade and evening fireworks into a full-day celebration. While we draw the crowds, we currently lack a strong third-party voice, sustained social media presence, and meaningful post-event media coverage — clear evidence that we are missing the kind of engaging, memorable moments that people naturally want to share and talk about long after the day ends. National brands with patriotic, family-oriented values cannot replicate access to our unique audience size and demographic. With a professional sponsorship approach, we could partner with them to fund those missing pieces and turn the parade into something even more extraordinary for the entire community. 2. Current Structure The parade is organized primarily through a contract event production with limited City oversight. Sponsorship packages exist (tiers from $1,000 to $6,000+ for banners, bleachers, announcing, etc.), but there is no evidence of a dedicated sponsorship sales team, no professional outreach to large national brands, and no strategy for premium corporate partnerships or branded integrations. The City provides the prime route, public safety, infrastructure, and brand prestige, while the contractor manages production. There is no centralized city-led effort or sales team to maximize sponsorship revenue for better floats, helium balloons, staging, or other elements that enhance family appeal and overall quality. 3. Financial Data (Indirect Impact) Direct City revenue from the parade remains minimal, with the event relying almost entirely on private fundraising rather than taxpayer dollars. Revenue streams include sponsorships, parade entry fees (e.g., $1,200+ for business/group entries), VIP/bleacher tickets, general donations, and ancillary on-site sales—all managed through the professional contractor, PSQ Productions (hired under a multi-year Professional Services Contract approved by the City Council in 2024). The contractor reports an annual production budget need of approximately $500,000+, covering high-cost items like the fireworks display over the ocean (a major expense), parade logistics (barricades, sound systems, staging, insurance, permits), the Surf City 5K, marketing and earned media (including TV coverage on KABC), entertainment, safety, cleanup, and more. The City contributes in-kind support (police/fire/public works overtime, permits), but the bulk is privately raised. While PSQ Productions provides professional management to handle the event's massive scale the dollars—or lack thereof—highlight a clear shortfall in sales and sponsorship pursuit. 413 Despite all of the high-value promotional opportunities and a dedicated sponsorship contact/channel, insufficient or inconsistent sponsorship and donation revenue persists—suggesting a lack of proactive, high-effort sales outreach (e.g., targeted corporate pitches, leveraging attendee demographics for premium activations, or expanding beyond basic tiers). This leaves the city forcing compromises on production quality—such as smaller-scale fireworks, fewer high-impact entries, reduced media, or limited "wow factor" elements—which diminishes long-term event prestige, community excitement, and growth potential. The true return is indirect: earned media amplification, boosted family tourism, and reinforced brand value for Huntington Beach. However, with stronger, more aggressive sponsorship sales aligned to the event's unmatched assets, revenue could more reliably meet or exceed needs—unlocking higher production standards, greater sustainability under professional management, and even expanded programming without relying so heavily on donations or cutting corners. 4. Benchmark Comparison Comparable large-scale parades and events treat sponsorship as a professional revenue engine to fund premium production and visibility. ● Rose Parade (Pasadena) generates $1M–$5M+ in direct sponsorships to support elaborate floats and broadcast quality. ● Regional events like the Surf City Marathon (Huntington Beach, ~18,000–22,000 participants) secure a title sponsor that brings in over $200,000 alone, funding a beautiful, high-quality event despite much smaller attendance. ● Brands like Carnival Cruiseline regularly commit $100,000+ just to sponsor the fireworks portion of San Diego's Big Bay Boom 4th of July celebration. These examples show that even smaller-scale events monetize sponsorships effectively through professional sales. Huntington Beach’s parade — with 15–25x the crowd and televised exposure — severely under-prices and under-sells its opportunity. 5. Structural Gaps The current model creates clear vulnerabilities: ● No dedicated sponsorship sales team or professional outreach to large national brands, resulting in low pricing and limited premium partnerships ● Sponsorship tiers capped at $6,000 despite massive attendance and TV coverage — far below market rates for comparable visibility ● Insufficient revenue to fund high-quality production (e.g., elaborate floats, helium balloons, professional staging), lowering appeal and reducing overall impact ● Missed opportunities for premium branding, corporate integrations, or merchandise tie-ins that could amplify earned media and third-party voice 414 ● No formal collaboration with hotels, tourism partners, or national brands to package experiences around the event ● Limited City oversight or strategy to maximize sponsorship revenue while keeping the parade free and community-focused These gaps mean the parade under-delivers on production quality and brand amplification despite its massive scale. Missed Merchandising Opportunity – Americas 250 Huntington Beach’s three-day Fourth of July celebration creates a massive short-term captive audience — especially with America’s 250th birthday in 2026 driving huge demand for patriotic souvenirs and commemorative items. A third-party deal with a local surf shop currently gives them 70% of official parade merchandise sales, leaving only 30% for parade organizers. There is no valid reason to hand the majority of this one-weekend windfall to an outside entity when the crowd, the event, and the historic milestone belong to Huntington Beach residents and taxpayers. A city-controlled merchandising program — on-site booths, pre-sale, limited-edition 250th anniversary t-shirts, hats, flags, beach towels, and collectibles — could realistically generate $250,000 or more in revenue over the three-day weekend (conservative estimate based on high-attendance holiday event benchmarks and the expected semiquincentennial surge). Missed Opportunity: America 250 Exhibition at the Huntington Beach Art Center With America’s 250th birthday this year, Huntington Beach has a prime chance to host a highly curated “Americana” gallery exhibition at the Art Center — featuring patriotic themes, historical reinterpretations, Veteran artists and works from both established and emerging artists that celebrate our nation’s journey. This show timed to coincide with the Fourth of July weekend could draw significant regional and national tourism and media. This would create a major cultural draw, generate earned media, boost third-party voice, and position the HBAC as a meaningful tourism destination in the city. It could also produce direct revenue through commissions on featured works, and limited-edition prints/merchandise — all while elevating the facility’s national recognition and giving local artists exposure alongside bigger names. Instead, the opportunity remains untapped, leaving the HBAC disconnected from one of the most significant cultural moments of the century and missing both tourism and prestige gains that neighboring cities would aggressively pursue. 6. Revenue Gap 415 Our Independence day celebration attracts 300,000–500,000 attendees and significant TV coverage, yet sponsorship revenue remains low due to under-pricing and lack of professional sales. Comparable events (e.g., Surf City Marathon with ~22,000 participants securing >$200K from a single title sponsor) demonstrate that a dedicated sales approach can generate substantial funding for quality. Huntington Beach struggles to cover enhanced production costs, limiting floats, helium, and other family-friendly elements. Conservative annual lost sponsorship opportunity: $200,000 – $1,000,000 (through higher-tier pricing, national brand partnerships, and premium integrations — enough to dramatically improve parade quality, increase earned media value, and strengthen community pride without charging admission). 7. Corrective Path Immediate: ● Establish more integrated City oversight for creative,event functions and sponsorship strategy with clear revenue and production-quality targets ● Conduct a full review of current sponsorship agreements, pricing, and production costs ● Define unified premium sponsorship guidelines tied to the Huntington Beach brand Mid-Term: ● Launch a professional sponsorship sales effort (dedicated team or contractor) targeting national brands for higher-tier packages (leveraging televised exposure and crowd size) ● Introduce premium branding opportunities (e.g., title sponsorships, branded floats, helium integrations) to fund production upgrades ● Strengthen coordination with hotels and tourism partners for packaged family experiences ● Develop proactive media outreach to boost national coverage and third-party amplification Long-Term: ● Expend Event & Celebrity Activations ● Build professional sponsorship capacity (leveraging existing staff and internships) ● Establish performance metrics tied to sponsorship revenue, production quality, earned media value, and tourism lift ● Direct all new sponsorship revenue back into parade production, public safety, and community programs so residents benefit from a higher-quality event Sources ● City-provided parade sponsorship and cost estimates (internal documents, 2024–2025) ● Public attendance estimates and economic impact reports for Huntington Beach 4th of July Parade (local media and tourism authority data, 2023–2025) ● Surf City Marathon attendance and sponsorship reports (Running USA, local news, 2025–2026: ~18,000–22,000 participants; title sponsor >$200K) ● Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade sponsorship revenue benchmarks (Licensing International and event industry reports) 34 416 ● Rose Parade and regional 4th of July event financial summaries (Pasadena Tournament of Roses, coastal city festival reports) ● Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Long Beach 4th of July event public budgets and sponsorship data (2024–2025) 11. Overburdened & Reactive In many areas, Huntington Beach operates in a reactive mode rather than a proactive one, in part, because our creative staff is severely overburdened. Creative teams across departments are stretched thin or don’t exist, responding to immediate demands instead of actively identifying and pursuing high-value opportunities. Without dedicated creative leadership, brand infrastructure, and modern systems to coordinate efforts, the City lacks the capacity to bridge departments, meaningfully collaborate with key stakeholders across the city, or drive strategic initiatives that turn our Surf City identity into real economic and community value. All the issues we’ve examined — merchandising, film permitting, the Art Center, the Fourth of July parade, and others — may seem separate, but they are deeply symbiotic. Together they form a powerful ecosystem: better brand management fuels stronger tourism, stronger events drive higher merchandising and sponsorship revenue, improved cultural assets elevate third-party voice and earned media, and proactive collaboration across these areas creates richer community experiences while generating sustainable returns. Growth doesn’t happen through reactive fixes — it comes from intentional communication, coordination, and creative direction focused on harnessing these interconnected opportunities. We’ve barely scratched the surface of identifying opportunities with just a few short weeks of research. The potential we’ve uncovered so far is only the beginning — there are likely dozens more levers waiting to be pulled. These opportunities aren’t just about revenue; they can generate funding to help ease the burden on our overburdened staff, allowing them to shift from constant firefighting to strategic, proactive work that benefits the entire community. Our brand is one of the City’s most valuable and overlooked assets: globally recognized, built over generations by residents, and capable of delivering millions in revenue and enhanced quality of life if managed proactively. Until we address staff overburdening, invest in creative leadership, and build the infrastructure and systems needed to operate strategically, we will continue missing significant revenue, tourism lift, and community value. Our brand deserves proactive care — not just reactive maintenance. 12. MISSED OPPORTUNITIES - CIVIC PATHWAYS 417 During our research we noticed a lack of internship programs throughout many areas of the city. A developed program can ease burden on city staff and provide youth with meaningful opportunities to help shape their futures. From Volunteering to Viable Futures — Building Local Talent That Stays Huntington Beach is rich in talent, pride, and civic culture — but we are losing our youth to other cities. Not because they don’t love this place, but because we haven’t given them a clear, visible path to build a future here. We already run some of the best youth programs in the country: the world-class Junior Lifeguard program builds discipline, leadership, and physical excellence; the Police Explorers program delivers real exposure to public safety and civic responsibility. These prove Huntington Beach knows how to create elite, structured opportunities for young people. The problem is scope: these programs are exceptional but narrow — focused on specific careers and not available to every student. Broader volunteer opportunities across departments are valuable, but they are mostly adult-oriented, short-term, service-based, and not tied to skill-building, certifications, or employment pipelines. They answer “How can I help?” — not “What can I become here?” The Gap Huntington Beach currently lacks: ● A city-wide youth career pipeline ● Internships embedded in departments ● Clear pathways from high school → training → local employment or industry careers As a result: ● Our most capable students leave for cities with better opportunities ● Trades, creative fields, and technical roles struggle to recruit locally ● Civic careers remain invisible to the next generation The Solution: Civic Pathways Initiative A structured, city-wide internship and apprenticeship system for high-school students — paid and non-paid — spanning every department and industry: libraries, parks, media, design, public works, skilled trades, administration, and more. This complements (does not replace) existing volunteer, Junior Lifeguard, and Police Explorers programs — it’s the natural evolution. Program Structure ● Tier 1: Civic Exploration (Ages 15–16) — Short rotations (6–8 weeks) for discovery and exposure 418 ● Tier 2: Civic Internships (Ages 16–18) — Non-paid, semester/summer programs/roles with real deliverables and skill-building ● Tier 3: Civic Apprenticeships (18+) — Direct workforce tracks with unions, contractors, and priority city hiring Department-Specific Pathways (Examples) ● Library & Cultural Services → Digital archiving, event programming, community storytelling ● Parks, Recreation & Beaches → Environmental stewardship, facilities operations ● Media, Film & Communications → Video production, social media, event documentation (major strategic advantage for in-house capacity) ● Design & Creative Services → Graphic design, branding support ● Public Works & Skilled Trades → Electrical/plumbing/HVAC shadowing, safety certifications, union pipelines ● City Administration → Policy research, budgeting, operations Integration ● Partner with HB Union High School District for Career Technical Education alignment, work-study credit, and merit-based applications ● Each participant gets a mentor, clear goals, evaluations, work samples, certifications, and recommendation letters Funding & Sustainability Low-risk model: ● Workforce development grants ● Business/union partnerships ● Long-term savings from reduced outsourcing, faster recruitment, and local talent retention Why This Matters This initiative: ● Keeps talent local and builds generational ownership ● Strengthens the workforce across departments ● Creates debt-free career paths in high-demand fields ● Turns youth engagement into long-term civic and economic value The city already knows how to run elite youth programs — They’ve proven it on our beaches and in public safety. Now it’s time to bring that same excellence to libraries, trades, media, design, and civic leadership. When young people can see a real future here, they’ll stop looking elsewhere. 419 Other cities recruit talent. Huntington Beach can grow it — and keep it. MOVING FORWARD What comes next is an opportunity to fix broken systems and rebuild the city’s revenue engines. The opportunities outlined in this report represent only the initial layer of what may be possible. After only a few weeks of research, this research has already identified several areas where improved coordination, modernized agreements, and stronger infrastructure could generate millions in additional value while improving the experience of residents, visitors, and businesses alike. There are likely many more opportunities still waiting to be uncovered. With the right systems in place — and with the collaboration of City leadership, staff, community stakeholders, and industry partners — Huntington Beach has the potential not only to protect its identity, but to turn that identity into a powerful engine for sustainable economic growth, cultural relevance, and community pride. The goal moving forward is not simply to identify problems, but to help build the infrastructure, partnerships, and institutional knowledge that allow the city to operate independently, confidently, and strategically in managing the Surf City brand. Report Basis and Limitations This report reflects the good-faith analysis, observations, and opinions of Wolffhaus based on the information available at the time of review, including public records, materials provided, interviews, and direct observations. Any evaluative statements, findings, or conclusions are presented as professional opinions based on that information and are not intended as allegations of unlawful conduct. This report is intended to support operational, policy, and strategic review, and its conclusions may change if additional information becomes available. 420 Page 1 of 17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND WOLFFHAUS. FOR BRAND, MEDIA, PRESS AND DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT, MARKETING AND ASSESSMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY,” and WOLFFHAUS, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a CONSULTANT to provide, in part, brand, media, press and digital ecosystem comprehensive audit, marketing and assessment services; and In addition to comprehensive skill set and unique familiarity of City services, CONSULTANT has been selected pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03.100 relating to budget procurement of professional service contracts. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Tyler Wolff who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 421 Page 2 of 17 3. TERM; TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence on ____________________, 20____ (the "Commencement Date"). All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed as provided in the schedule identified in Exhibit A. The schedule for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are milestones for payment purposes. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULTANT. The City agrees to cooperate in good faith and provide reasonable access to personnel, information, records, facilities, in the City’s control and/or possession and decisions necessary for the CONSULTANT to perform the services contemplated under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT’S performance and project timelines are dependent upon the timely cooperation of the City and its departments. If the City fails to provide requested information, approvals, access, or cooperation within a reasonable time (Delays), any resulting delay by CONSULTANT shall automatically extend the applicable project schedules, milestones, and deliverable dates by a period equal to the delay. Any delay reasonably caused, in whole or in part, by the City shall be documented in writing by CONSULTANT and provided to the City Manager within five (5) business days after such delay becomes reasonably identifiable. Any determination of City-caused delay shall be based on objective facts and supporting records, If the City caused or contributed to the delay, applicable project schedules, milestones, and deliverable dates shall be extended by the period reasonably impacted. If the City materially interferes with, delays, blocks, or refuses access necessary for performance, and does not cure after notice, Consultant may suspend services and/or terminate, with payment due for work performed plus termination fee as described in Section 4. 422 Page 3 of 17 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the Services to be performed under this Agreement and Exhibit A, City shall pay Consultant a fixed monthly retainer in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00) payable in twenty-four (24) monthly installments. In no event shall the total compensation paid to Consultant exceed Seven Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($720,000.00.). The first payment will be due 5 days after City’s receipt of the initial Monthly Progress Deliverable, and following payments will be due the first Friday of every month thereafter. Consultant shall submit, on or before the 21st of each month, (i) an invoice for the applicable billing period, and (ii) a Monthly Progress Deliverable, and City shall pay the applicable monthly installment on the first Friday of every month thereafter. “Monthly Progress Deliverable” means a monthly submission evidencing substantive advancement of the Scope of Services, which may include progress summaries, strategic plans, recommendations, draft or final materials, implementation updates, milestone tracking, issue logs, requested City actions or approvals, and other documentation showing material progress across the contracted programs. The parties acknowledge that the Services under this Agreement consist of an ongoing professional engagement across multiple concurrent initiatives, including strategy, development, implementation, coordination, system design, operational buildout, creative direction, program development, oversight, and milestone advancement. Accordingly, monthly payment shall not require the completion of a final end-product or fully completed milestone in any individual month, provided that Consultant has materially advanced the Services and submitted the required invoice and Monthly Progress Deliverable. 423 Page 4 of 17 City review of each Monthly Progress Deliverable shall be limited to confirming that Consultant has materially performed and advanced the contracted Services during the applicable billing period. City may not withhold payment based on subjective preference, discretionary dissatisfaction, or the absence of a fully completed long-term milestone where measurable progress has been made within the Scope of Services. Unless City provides written notice within five (5) business days after receipt of the invoice and Monthly Progress Deliverable identifying with reasonable specificity a material deficiency in Consultant’s performance for the applicable billing period, the Monthly Progress Deliverable shall be deemed accepted for payment purposes, and receipt of such invoice and Monthly Progress Deliverable shall automatically trigger payment of the applicable monthly installment on the first Friday of the immediately following month. Any objection to a Monthly Progress Deliverable must be made in writing and must describe with reasonable specificity the alleged deficiency. City may withhold only the specific portion of payment reasonably related to a properly noticed and substantiated deficiency, and City shall timely pay all undisputed amounts when due. All City-specific deliverables produced under this agreement shall become the property of the City upon payment for services rendered. Certain initiatives, programs, or operational improvements recommended or developed by the CONSULTANT under this agreement may require additional funding, budget allocations, or expenditures by the City in order to implement at the City’s sole discretion. The Consultant can achieve milestones without major city financial expenditure. In addition, the performance of services under this agreement may require reasonable project-related expenses, including but not limited to specialty travel, production costs, materials, 424 Page 5 of 17 third-party services, or other costs necessary to support the execution of approved initiatives. The CONSULTANT shall not incur any of these expenses on behalf of the City without prior written authorization from the City Manager. Any approved project-related expenses shall be reimbursed by the City if pre-approved by the City Manager. If implementation of a program requires City funding approval, procurement processes, or third-party contracting, the associated project timelines and deliverable schedules shall be adjusted to reflect the City’s approval and funding process. Any additional funding, other than set forth in Compensation section, shall be subject to approval by the City Manager. 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms set forth herein and Exhibit "B." 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY 425 Page 6 of 17 upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all third-party claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs, including costs and attorney’s fees, but only to the extent arising out of the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, employees, or approved subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall have no obligation under this Section to the extent any such claim arises from the negligence, willful misconduct, directions, approvals, content, or independent acts or omissions of CITY or third parties not under CONSULTANT’S direction or control. CONSULTANT’S obligations under this Section shall be limited to matters within the scope of services under this Agreement and shall not extend to final governmental decisions, legal compliance determinations reserved to CITY, procurement decisions, budget approvals, permitting decisions, or operational acts undertaken exclusively by CITY. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the total cumulative liability of CONSULTANT to CITY arising out of or relating to this Agreement, whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, shall not exceed the lesser of: (i) the total compensation actually paid by CITY to CONSULTANT under this Agreement; or (ii) the proceeds actually available under any insurance required to be maintained by CONSULTANT under this Agreement. This limitation shall not apply to damages arising from CONSULTANT’S fraud or willful misconduct, or to the extent such limitation is prohibited by applicable law. 426 Page 7 of 17 CONSULTANT shall have no claim against the City for third-party claims, damages, losses, expenses, demands and defense costs, including costs and attorney’s fees, in law or equity, regarding any challenge to this Agreement such as the contracting process, directions, approvals, content, or independent acts or omissions of CITY or third parties not under CONSULTANT’S direction or control 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT’s professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. 427 Page 8 of 17 If CONSULTANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY’s election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect CONSULTANT’s right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSULTANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. state that the policy is currently in force; and C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice; however, ten (10) days’ prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULTANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a 428 Page 9 of 17 copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. The City may terminate this agreement for cause in the event the CONSULTANT materially breaches the terms of this agreement including but not limited to failure to complete milestones as set forth in Exhibit A. and fails to cure such breach within sixty (60) days following written notice describing the nature of the breach. In the event of termination for cause, the CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for services properly performed through the effective date of termination and for any completed deliverables accepted by the City 429 Page 10 of 17 The services contemplated under this agreement involve the development and transfer of strategic frameworks, operational systems, institutional knowledge, industry relationships, and program structures that become embedded within City operations. The City maintains discretion on which programs to implement which will not affect the CONSULTANT’s milestone deliverables. Once these elements are transferred, they cannot be practically removed or reversed. If the City elects to terminate this agreement prior to completion of the contracted scope of work for reasons other than termination for cause, the City shall compensate the CONSULTANT for: all services performed through the effective date of termination; completed deliverables not yet invoiced; A termination payment equal to fifty percent (50%) of the remaining unpaid contract balance. The termination payment reflects the remaining value of the engagement that cannot be recovered or withdrawn once the work has begun. The CONSULTANT may terminate this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the City if any of the following conditions occur: the City fails to make payment for services rendered within thirty (30) days after written notice of non-payment ; the City materially breaches the terms of this agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after written notice. The City prevents, obstructs, or materially interferes with the CONSULTANT’s ability to perform the agreed scope of services. the City materially breaches the terms of this agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after written notice. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the 430 Page 11 of 17 prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULTANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail-return receipt requested: TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: City Manager 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Wolffhaus ATTN: Tyler Wolff 1309 Coffeen Avenue, Suite 1200 Sheridan, WY 82801 431 Page 12 of 17 17. CONSENT When CITY's consent/approval is required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision 432 Page 13 of 17 contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplic ate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 24. ATTORNEY’S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall 433 Page 14 of 17 bear its own attorney’s fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that party or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior 434 Page 15 of 17 understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. CONSULTANT, WOLFFHAUS By:_________________________________ ____________________________________ print name ITS: (circle one) Chairman/President/Vice President AND By:_________________________________ ____________________________________ print name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary – Treasurer CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California _______________________________________ ___________________________Director/Chief (Pursuant To HBMC §3.03.100) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ City Attorney Date ________________________________ RECEIVE AND FILE: _____________________________________ City Clerk Date ________________________________ 435 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: 436 EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Fixed Fee Payment) 1. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to monthly progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 of the Contract. 2. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice as follows: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. 3. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hour ly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 437 Wolffhaus Scope of Professional Services for the City Of Huntington Beach Strategic Advisory & Implementation Support Huntington Beach Asset Modernization Initiative Company: Wolffhaus Lead Advisor: Tyler Wolff Term: 24 Months This engagement focuses on three strategic modernization initiatives identified in the City Asset and Revenue Audit: 1. Creative Direction & Communication Infrastructure 2. Film & Digital Media Office Development 3. Municipal Merchandising Modernization These initiatives are designed to strengthen the City’s control over its identity, modernize revenue capture tied to municipal assets, and build internal systems that can be sustained by City staff long-term. The engagement is structured as a systems-building initiative, not long-term outsourcing. Wolffhaus’s role is to assess, build, implement, train, and transition operational ownership back to the City. 1. CREATIVE DIRECTION, STRATEGY & COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE Objective Establish a modern communication and brand infrastructure that allows the City to consistently represent its identity, proactively promote its assets, and support economic initiatives. Wolffhaus Core Services 438 Brand & Communication ● Full Evaluation of current City communication infrastructure ● Review of digital media systems and content production ● Benchmark analysis against comparable municipalities ● Identification of structural communication gaps ● Act as Creative & Brand Strategist - Provide strategic creative and brand advisory services to the City within the contracted program areas during the Term. ● Engage with designated City staff and approved external stakeholders, as reasonably necessary, to support opportunities for revenue growth, brand value, and community benefit within the approved Scope of Services. Creative Direction & Strategy ● Development of unified municipal brand standards ● Visual identity guidelines for City communications ● Media production and storytelling framework ● Media Staff training ● Cross-department communication alignment Media Infrastructure ● Centralized digital media asset library strategy development ● Content production strategy ● Social media and digital distribution strategy ● Press and earned media engagement framework ● Consolidation of City messaging channels Internal Capacity Building ● Training related to Brand & Creative programs for City staff ● Development of communication SOPs (Standard Operating Procedure) ● Integration of media production across departments ● Alignment with tourism and economic development messaging Milestones & Deliverables 1. Creative Direction, Strategy & Communication Infrastructure Months 1–3 439 ● Complete assessment of current City communication infrastructure, media workflows, and asset organization ● Review current communication systems, content production practices, and archival/media assets ● Present brand governance, communication ownership, and operational structure recommendations ● Prepare draft City Brand Bible and initial communication standards framework Months 4–6 ● Finalize City Brand Bible and core communication standards ● Deliver digital media asset management system plan and recommendations, ● Establish content production strategy and messaging framework for approved program areas ● Deliver initial communication SOP framework and cross-department alignment recommendations Months 7–12 ● Implement unified communication strategy across approved City program areas ● Establish regular media production and messaging pipeline ● Implement core messaging alignment between City communications, tourism, and economic-facing initiatives ● Conduct initial staff training related to brand, media, and communication workflows Months 13–18 ● Finalize communication SOPs and internal workflow recommendations ● Refine digital asset organization, content processes, and media coordination systems ● Activate press and earned media support framework for approved initiatives ● Expand cross-department communication alignment within the approved Scope of Services Months 19–24 ● Institutionalize internal creative direction and communication framework ● Complete staff training and transition planning for long-term City use ● Deliver final recommendations for continued internal management and system maintenance ● Transition operational communication systems for sustained City-led use 2. MERCHANDISING PROGRAM 440 Objective Develop and implement a City-controlled merchandising program that captures the economic value of Huntington Beach’s global identity and tourism traffic while establishing transparent reporting and scalable revenue structures. Core Services Program Architecture Design and implement a modern municipal merchandising framework including: ● City-controlled merchandise program & licensing strategy ● Design & Development of Seasonal Merchandise ● Seasonal Merchandising Marketing Campaigns (Photo & Video) ● Development of official & authenticated Huntington Beach merchandise line ● Direct-to-consumer sales model (online and event-based) ● Production and fulfillment partnerships negotiation and management ● Reporting and auditing infrastructure ● Brand licensing standards and product guidelines ● Negotiations on behalf of city with vendors for best rates on production ● Online Direct to Consumer Website/store development ● Integration with events and tourism programming ● Retail strategy recommendations (including flagship retail locations) ● Provide relevant staffing for merchandising-related materials and campaigns within the approved program scope. Governance & Oversight ● Creation of merchandise program SOPs ● Financial reporting and oversight structure built for city staff ● Licensing and vendor management policies ● Integration with City communications and event programming Milestones & Deliverables Months 1–3 441 ● Complete detailed merchandising program audit and opportunity assessment ● Review existing licensing structures, intellectual property issues, and revenue gaps ● Deliver initial retail, wholesale, and interim merchandise strategy ● Identify seasonal and event-based merchandising opportunities for near-term implementation ● Develop stop-gap interim merchandise plan for short-term sales activation Months 4–6 ● Establish official City-controlled merchandise program framework ● Finalize brand licensing standards, product guidelines, and governance recommendations ● Negotiate or assist in establishing vendor, production, and fulfillment relationships ● Develop product roadmap and launch initial online direct-to-consumer and wholesale store Months 7–12 ● Launch official merchandise program ● Implement online and event-based sales integration ● Establish revenue tracking, reporting, and oversight framework ● Seasonal merchandise development and campaign planning ● Deliver retail expansion recommendations for approved City channels and locations Months 13–18 ● Expand product assortment, campaign activity, and sales opportunities ● Develop additional distribution, collaboration, and tourism-facing sales opportunities ● Refine merchandising operations based on performance and reporting data ● Advance opportunities for local artist, photographer, and cultural merchandise participation, where approved Months 19–24 ● Complete expansion of approved distribution and partnership opportunities ● Fully integrate merchandising into approved tourism, event, and public-facing City initiatives ● Finalize merchandising SOPs, oversight structure, and staff training materials ● Transition to a fully operational City merchandise system capable of ongoing internal management 442 3. FILM & DIGITAL MEDIA OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Objective Establish Huntington Beach as a competitive production destination while creating a structured film permitting and location marketing system that generates recurring municipal revenue. Core Services Film Office Development Design and establish a structured film office framework including: ● Film liaison coordination system ● Production permitting workflow modernization ● Location marketing strategy ● Film industry outreach program for Producers ● Film Education opportunies for the community ● Production handbook and location guide to ease strain on city staff ● Creation of Location Library Asset system will be handled by Wolffhaus Revenue Strategy ● Film permit fee optimization ● Location usage agreements & pricing ● Integration with tourism and media exposure ● Increased local spend generates sales tax & Hotel TOT revenue Industry Outreach Production company engagement Location manager outreach Film industry network development Participation in industry events and marketing initiatives Milestones & Deliverables 443 Months 1–3 ● Complete Film and Digital Media program assessment ● Develop film office operational framework, ownership roles, and implementation outline ● Prepare production handbook outline and location marketing strategy foundation ● Develop initial outreach strategy for producers, brands, and industry contacts Months 4–6 ● Establish official Huntington Beach Film Office framework ● Deliver film permitting modernization recommendations and implementation plan ● Develop digital location marketing materials and core outreach tools ● Launch initial industry outreach effort ● Build Film Office website or landing page framework within approved City standards Months 7–12 ● Deliver final production handbook and location guide ● Publish initial location library and marketing assets ● Implement production revenue reporting structure ● Advance active production pipeline development and location promotion ● Integrate film office positioning with City communications and tourism-facing promotion Months 13–18 ● Expand producer, location manager, and industry outreach activity ● Refine permitting, coordination, and location marketing workflows ● Develop recurring production relationship pipeline ● Advance community education and workforce pathway recommendations related to film activity Months 19–24 ● Finalize fully operational municipal film office infrastructure ● Deliver annualized revenue reporting and program performance framework ● Finalize workforce integration, internship, or apprenticeship recommendations within approved scope ● Complete staff transition materials, SOPs, and long-term operational recommendations Ongoing Strategic Advisory & Monthly Support Services 444 Throughout the Term, Consultant shall provide recurring monthly strategic advisory, creative direction, and implementation support across the program areas identified in this Scope of Services: (i) Creative Direction, Strategy & Communication Infrastructure, (ii) Municipal Merchandising Modernization, and (iii) Film & Digital Media Office Development. These recurring monthly services are intended to provide continuity of leadership, maintain momentum across active workstreams, support City decision-making, and ensure consistent monthly advancement of the Scope of Services. Recurring monthly services may include, as applicable, strategic counsel to City leadership and designated staff; creative and brand direction; messaging and communications guidance; cross- department coordination and alignment directly related to the contracted program areas; refinement of frameworks, recommendations, standards, and work product already underway within the approved Scope of Services; implementation oversight; partner and stakeholder coordination related to approved initiatives; planning meetings and working sessions reasonably necessary to advance the contracted programs; initiative review and advancement; and monthly reporting regarding work completed, work in progress, upcoming priorities, and City dependencies affecting schedule or implementation. Such recurring monthly services are limited to matters directly related to the three program areas expressly identified in this Scope of Services and to the priorities reasonably scheduled for the applicable billing period. Consultant’s recurring monthly services do not include unlimited on-demand services. Consultant shall retain reasonable discretion as to the manner, sequencing, staffing, and prioritization of the Services performed during each billing period, subject to coordination with City regarding priorities, dependencies, approvals, and operational needs within the approved Scope of Services. Any request by City that materially expands the Scope of Services, increases the volume of work beyond the recurring monthly strategic support contemplated herein, or requires services outside the three contracted program areas shall constitute Additional Services and shall require prior written authorization by both parties, together with any appropriate adjustment to compensation, schedule, deliverables, or both. The parties acknowledge that these recurring monthly strategic services are a substantive and ongoing part of the engagement and are separate from, and in addition to, the longer-range milestone deliverables identified elsewhere in this Scope of Services. Engagement Outcome At the conclusion of the 24-month engagement, the City will have: 445 • A fully operational municipal merchandising program • A structured film office capable of generating recurring revenue • A modern communication and brand infrastructure • Documented operational systems and trained internal staff The long-term goal is institutional capability, ensuring the City retains full operational control without reliance on outside consultants. Program Integration The city's brand value is highly dependent on a complex ecosystem. While each initiative functions independently, they are designed to reinforce one another: ● Creative direction supports merchandise branding ● Film productions amplify the City’s global image ● Merchandise programs leverage tourism and media visibility ● Events and cultural programming support brand growth This integrated structure ensures the City’s identity functions as a coordinated economic and cultural asset. 446 447 448 Decades of broken systems & oversight gaps have drained our community of millions annually. It's time we fix them. 449 1/!lffe THEISSUES LOSS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTROL Our brand is not protected or treated as a revenue asset Ill BUDGET DEFICIT PRESSURE Growing fiscal challenges while revenue potential is left uncaptured FIVE CORE CONCERNS cf VENDOR DEPENDENCY RISK Heavy reliance on outside operators reduces control and inflates costs and lessens returns. A MASSIVE REVENUE LEAKAGE Tourism, events, media, and licensing, lack strong oversight FRAGMENTED BRAND OWNERSHIP Responsibility scattered across departments with no unified strategy These five structural gaps are costing taxpayers at least $2M-$SM+ yearly and up to $18M or more over the next five years. 450 IJf/l, THEDATA WHAT OUR AUDIT FOUND: MILLIONS LEAKING EVERY YEAR MERCHANDISING & LICENSING Surf City Store: $1.SlSM sales ➔ City received only $75,761 (5% royalty). Pier lease: $950/month. Widespread unlicensed HB apparel sold city-wide with zero return. BRAND & MEDIA No centralized voice or modern infrastructure. Most high visibility press is political or controversy-focused hurting tourism, economy & civic pride CONSERVATIVE ANNUAL LOST OPPORTUNITY: $2M $SM+ PUBLIC ASSET: ART CENTER Underutilized & subsidized at approximately $500,000 per year in taxpayer dollars -with almost no earned revenue or residual value to our artists & community. EVENTS, FILM, & OPERATIONS Underpriced sponsorships, fragmented film operations, weak contracts, no proactive programming, and overburdened staff. 5-VEAR POTENTIAL: $18M+ in ne\N revenue, savings, and economic activity 451 1J/ll THEISSUES THIS IS HOME FOR US. We cannot sit idly by while value is lost, our community feels the impact, and our world-class city operates beneath its potentia I. Standing by was never an option. 452 STRATEGY &GROWTH 111 FILM & MEDIA CREATIVE D II RECTION 0 PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT EVENTS& EXPERIENTIAL 453 1f/Jff ABOUTUS WHAT DO THEY SAY ABOUT US? WOLFFHAUS Mtr ·.~ ~1th lffAlTHr ~OLYMPIC AMOICA"S N•W \'~::, Ult ~TUlTltU L~ JELLY ROLL ~t,_SWUT, 111111 HIS IPICRTNIN JOURNff :c:=:- NICOTINE ---- JELLY ROLL Grammy Award-Winning Artist "Tyler is by far the most creative person I've worked with in the industry, and I am in an industry with the most creative people in the world. Tyler isn't just a creator, he's a vision caster. He's the rare moment where art, heart and hard work meet each other." soy ., SOME OF OUR CLIENTS: ''Wolffhaus sees "11hat others overlook -and actually fixes it.'' AUBREY MARCUS Co-Founder, Joe Regan's "Onnit" "Tyler was the first to set the standard for our media direction and framework at Onnit. He was way ahead of his time, and helped us emerge as a leading disruptive brand with his unique combination of artistry and vision" JACK ROUSH JR. Roush Performance Wolffhaus acted as Creative Director for Roush . Their work had a great impact. With Tyler's unique vision and strategy, they created programs that were powerful and engaging. The effect was very significantly increased sales and brand interest. bDlboard :Rdfb,gStcJae m i-t~.~ •• I\ -4h':~m _ ROUSH 61':\ BLACK RIFLE Oscovery <•~~a • ·--~ ·• \:!:7 cwru COM,of •• ~., c \c./ 'W" 454 ltfJJtf, THEDATA W!---- WHAT ISA BRAND ECOSYSTEM? A Brand Ecosystem turns • • • recogn1t1on into revenue. A brand ecosystem works when each piece strengthens the next -turning attention into visitation, visitation into spending, and spending into lasting community value. Right now, those pieces are fragmented, and too much value is being lost in the gaps. 455 1ft{Jf LET'SBUILD WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING Three High-Impact Modernization Initiatives 24-Month Engagement -Systems Built, Operationalized, Trained, and Handed Back to City 456 !Jiff LET'SBUILD THIS PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO STRENGTHEN THE CITY FROM WITHIN -BUILDING SYSTEMS, SUPPORTING STAFF, EXPANDING CAPACITY. SUCCESS IS CREATING NEW OPPORTUNITIES FROM THE CITY'S EXISTING ASSETS WHILE UNLOCKING THE FUNDING NEEDED FOR GROWTH LONG-TERM SUCCESS, NOT LONG-TERM DEPENDENCE. 457 458 ltPftf, MERCH W!---- WE LET OTHERS POCKET MILLIONS FROM OUR BRAND I $1.SlSM in Surf City Store sales ➔ City gets only $75,761 (5% royalty) Severely Undermarket Pier Store Lease: Approximately $950/month (Could be a Flagship Store whose sales benefit our community) Unlicensed HB apparel sold city-wide ➔ millions lost Global surf apparel market: $70.37 billion and growing 459 ltPftf, MERCH W!---- BASIC MERCH MATH Example: A Licensed $30 T-Shirt currently returns $1.50 to the city. With a city owned program - a $30 T Shirt now returns between $15-20 with a direct to consumer sale, and $3-5 on a sale to a licensed retailer. Unlicensed merchandise currently for sale at several locations and vendors, $0 is returned to the city. There are many more categories of merchandise with higher and lower return rates, but basic apparel is low hanging fruit. Cheap, fast and efficient to produce and has constant visibility. Licensed Merch andise Sales Fees Paid to City Li cense Fee Total 5% License Fee Pa id Month/ Year to City Sales January 2024 $ 46 ,840 .75 $ 2,342.04 February 2024 $ 46,214.11 $ 2,310 .71 March 2024 $ 64,434.68 $ 3 ,221.73 April 2024 $ 59 ,643 .90 $ 2,982 .20 May2024 $ 84,857.09 $ 4,242.85 June 2024 $ 87 ,292.83 $ 4 ,364 .64 July 2024 $ 118,469.12 $ 5 ,9 23 .46 August2024 $ 73,484.83 $ 3,6 74.24 September 2024 $ 59,704.09 $ 2,9 85.20 October 2024 $ 65,013.50 $ 3 ,250.68 November 2024 $ 30,087 .49 $ 1,504.37 December 2024 $ 48 ,488 .68 $ 2 ,4 24.43 January 2 025 $ 43,473 .12 $ 2,173.66 February 2025 $ 38 ,966.5 3 $ 1,948 .3 3 March 2025 $ 55,873.55 $ 2,7 9 3.68 April 2025 $ 55 ,206.48 $ 2 ,760.32 May2025 $ 77,300.61 $ 3 ,865.03 June2025 $ 84,677 .14 $ 4,233 .86 July2025 $ 102,954 .37 $ 5,147 .72 August2025 $ 85,578.45 $ 4 ,278 .92 September 2025 $ 49,281 .15 $ 2,464 .06 October 2025 $ 57 ,229 .93 $ 2 ,861 .50 November 2025 $ 36,794 .70 $ 1,839.74 December 2025 $ 43 ,348 .84 $ 2,167.44 AND $0 COLLECTED FROM UNLICENSED MERCH SALES 460 CITY-CONTROLLED MERCHANDISING= SOOK-lM+ NEW ANNUAL REVENUE f) Industry-standard royalties & wholesale rates 0 City-owned merchandising program f) Official on line store + seasonal collections f) Bring unlicensed sellers into a legitimate city wholesale program f) Event pop-ups + kiosks + full tourism integration 461 LOW-EFFORT, LOW RISK, HICH-RETURN RETAIL TOUCHPOINTS IN SPACES WE ALREADY OWN Art Center, libraries, City hall and more stocked with branded kiosks with art prints, photography, and limited-edition merch Revenue-share with local artists & photographers Drop-ship program (zero inventory risk) 462 1fljf FILMHB FILMHB THE HUNTINGTON BEACH FILM & MEDIA OFFICE 463 ltPftf, FILMHB W!---- WE ARE SITTING ON A GOLD MINE - AND NOT MINING IT. Iconic pier, beaches, Civic Center, Equestrian Center, Pacific City, Sports Complex -hundreds of diverse locations in a compact footprint. Ability to move fast and cut the red tape that slows L.A. productions and frustrates producers. Current: modest fees, zero proactive outreach. 464 ltfJ!tf, FILMHB W!---- Once Established lOOk-300k+ Annual Direct Revenue (Permitting, Location Use, Parking, Etc) Indirect Gains: OFF-SEASON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Hotels, restaurants, retail, local suppliers LOCAL JOBS Production Casts, Crew, and Support Services POLICE/FIRE OVERTIME Covered by production fees POP CULTURE RELEVANCE Third-party advocacy and global exposure EARNED MEDIA & TOURISM LIFT Year-round visitor interest BENCHMARKS SAN FRANCISCO: $127k in permit fees $17.SM in local spend FORT WORTH: $BOOM in cumulative economic impact ECONOMIC IMPACT Productions spend money locally on hotels, catering, crews, transportation, locations, rentals, and city services. That spending creates a ripple effect across the local economy while also generating tax revenue through hotel stays, sales activity, and related business growth. 465 11/Jf CREATIVESERVICES CREATIVE DIRECTION Huntington Beach already has the identity, energy, and community pride. What it needs is the creative leadership to bring those strengths together in a more unified, consistent, and effective way. This kind of leadership helps align departments, support staff, strengthen partnerships, improve communication, and create more opportunity across tourism, events, culture, business, and civic life. By building systems, It it will help the City show up with greater clarity, quality, and coordination so its existing assets can work harder for the people who live here. WHAT WE'ii BUILD 1. UNIFIED CITY BRAND DIRECTION 2. CROSS-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION FRAMEWORK 3. MODERN MEDIA & CONTENT INFRASTRUCTURE 4 . CENTRALIZED MEDIA ASSET MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 5. DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION & WORKFLOW SYSTEMS 6. PROACTIVE PRESS & MEDIA STRATEGY 7. DIGITAL PRESENCE MODERNIZATION 8. CREATIVE STANDARDS & GOVERNANCE 9. TRAINING, SUPPORT & INTERNAL CAPACITY BUILDING 10. OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH BETTER ASSET USE This is not about changing Huntington Beach. It is about better support, connecting, and elevating what is already here. 466 REATIVESERVICES CENTRALIZED CREATIVE LEADERSHIP & MODERN BRAND INFRASTRUCTURE Unified messaging across every department Professional media standards Content strategy Staff training+ internship pipeline Proactive press and influencer relationships 467 THE FIX: • Centralized creative leadersh i p and modern media infrastructure • Consisterit pipeline of positive, bi-partisan community-centered stories • More efficient communication across departments and initiatives • Support a more complete and balanced public understanding of the city • Rei['lforce civic. Rride while i(llproving regional and v1s1tor perception • Ensure Huntinqton Beach is represented by more than ifs most polarizing moments RESULTS: • Stronger Tourism • Better Partnerships • Renewed Civic Pride • Greater Business Attraction • Stronger Community Awareness • Increased Visitor Confidence • More Earned Media Value • More Local Engagement • Greater Cultural Visibility 468 11/Jf CIVIC ASSET HBAC HUNTINGTON BEACH ART CENTER The Art Center should be a living cultural asset for Huntington Beach. Right now, it is falling short both in the value it delivers to local artists and the community and in its ability to sustain itself as a civic asset . This is not a criticism of the artists or the local art community. The issue is structural: the City has not built the systems, partnerships , promotion, and revenue pathways that allow artists, exhibitions, and the public to get full value from the space. With stronger programming, better visibility, collaboration, and better infrastructure, the Art Center could become a stronger civic asset, a better platform for artists, and a more active part of Huntington Beach's brand and local economy. AN UNDER-LEVERAGED CULTURAL ASSET THAT COSTS THE CITY ABOUT SOOK IN TAXPAYER FUNDS TO OPERATE ANNUALLY. WE HAVE ALL OF THE INGREDIENTS TO BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING, OR EVEN REVENUE GENERATING WHILE PROVIDING MORE VALUE TO OUR COMMUNITY. 469 11/Jf CIVIC ASSET HBAC HUNTINGTON BEACH ART CENTER WHAT WE'RE MISSING Collaboration with neighboring cities, tourism partners, hotels and regional cultural groups to expand reach. A proactive press strategy that turns exhibitions into community stories and broader cultural visibility. A strong digital archive or online gallery presence to preserve shows and extend artist exposure. (Residual value for artists after exhibitions end . These systems help artists turn visibility into audience growth, future opportunities, and sales) Built-in print sales, merchandise, and other revenue-generating mechanisms tied to exhibitions. Strategic partnerships that position the Art Center as part of Huntington Beach's broader brand and visitor experience. Broader Community-facing infrastructure that makes the space more visible, active, and utilized. A clear operational model that treats the Art Center as a civic asset, tourism touch point, and cultural ambassador. 470 11/Jf CIVIC ASSET HBAC AMERICA'S 250 As part of America's 250th celebration, Huntington Beach will host a major summer art exhibition featuring world-renowned, internationally exhibited artists and emerging local talent . Rooted in Americana and infused with rock and roll, surf, skate, and Huntington Beach culture, the show pairs iconic contemporary work with a curated display of Huntington Beach artifacts . Running from June through July 20 (during the Laguna art festival season opening), the exhibition will also create mentorship opportunities for local artists and introduce limited-edition prints and merchandise that generate value for the artists, the Art Center, and the City. 471 11/Jf AMERICA'S250TH PARADE INITIATIVES For America's 250th, we are working to elevate the Huntington Beach parade into a bigger, higher-impact civic celebration by converting its existing scale and attendance into stronger sponsorship revenue and more meaningful community activations. That means more visual spectacle, more entertainment value, and more reasons for people to stay, engage, and spend time downtown . Planned initiatives include enhanced floats, large-format parade balloons, premium sponsor-supported activations, and a celebrity-hosted Hot Rod section that will roll into a Main Street car show after the parade - extending the experience well beyond the route itself and creating a larger cultural and economic moment for the City. 472 I/I.If CIVICPATHWAYS CIVIC PATHWAYS Huntington Beach is rich in talent, pride, and industry-but we are losing our young people. Not because they don't love this city, but because we don't show them a clear future here. While Huntington Beach offers respected programs like Junior Lifeguards, Police Explorers, and volunteer opportunities, these experiences a re not structured as visible career pathways for everyone's interests. 473 11/.If CIVICPATHWAYS CIVIC PATHWAYS The Civic Pathways Initiative changes that. It creates a structured bridge from school to meaningful local careers by turning civic engagement into internships, apprenticeships, and mentorships across city departments and partner industries -from public safety and parks to media, design, skilled trades, and film. By giving young residents real experience, real opportunities and a real reason to stay, Huntington Beach can retain its talent, strengthen its workforce, and invest in a generation that grows with the city instead of leaving it behind. 474 1J!fj!f, CIVICPATHWAYS HOMEGROWN TALENT - KEEP OUR YOUTH IN HUNTINGTON BEACH City-wide internships and apprenticeships across many departments Pathways from High School to local careers Builds alongside current offerings of world class existing programs {Junior Lifeguards, Police Explorers, Fire programs) Creates generational ownership, reduces outsourcing, and strengthens the workforce 475 476 1J/Jff CREATIVELEADERSHIP ONGOING STRATEGIC ADVISORY SUPPORT REAL TIME GUIDANCE: On brand decisions, communications, and emerging opportunities. CROSS DEPARTMENT ALIGNMENT: Unified messaging and coordinated efforts. RELATIONSHIPS & EXPERTISE: Connects the city with high-value partners, media, and influencers RESULT: A STRONGER, MORE COHESIVE BRAND THAT DRIVES HIGHER TOURISM YIELD, BETTER PARTNERSHIPS, RENEWED CIVIC PRIDE, AND LONG-TERM ECONOMIC VALUE. 477 1J/Jff CREATIVELEADERSHIP EQUIVALENT PRIVATE-SECTOR VALUE OF SERVICES PROVIDED Service / Deliverable Executive Creative Leadership + Strategic Advisory Apparel & Merchandising Program Development Film Management+ Liaison Support Account Management+ Operations Support Website Strategy, Design, and Development (2 Sites) Comprehensive Brand Standards System Four Seasonal Merchandise Campaigns Film Office Handbooks+ Production Materials TOTAL ESTIMATED PRIVATE-SECTOR VALUE Typical Private-Sector Cost $250,000-$350,000+ annually, plus employment liabilities $100,000-$120,000+ $100,000-$120,000+ $70,000+ annually, plus employment liabilities $65,000+ $50,000-$75,000 $80,000+ {$20,000 ea) $15,000-$25,000 $730,000-$905,000+ THIS IS NOT A SINGLE-SERVICE ENGAGEMENT. IT IS EXECUTIVE-LEVEL LEADERSHIP, PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, OPERATIONAL SUPPORT, CAMPAIGN CREATION, STAFF SUPPORT & RELATIONSHOP GROWTH BUNDLED INTO ONE INITIATIVE. City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-336 MEETING DATE:4/7/2026 Subject: Item Submitted by Councilman Gruel and Councilman Williams - Discussion of State Audit Recommended Action: Refer to City Council Member Memorandum (Included as Attachment #1). Attachment(s): 1. Council Member Item - Discussion of State Audit City of Huntington Beach Printed on 4/3/2026Page 1 of 1 478 City Council Meeting – Council Member Items Report To: City Council From: Andrew Gruel , Councilman Chad Williams, Councilman Date: April 7 , 2026 Subject: Discussion of State Audit 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Authorize legal counsel to commence settlement discussions with counsel for the State Auditor, regarding the Grant Parks case. The goal would be to arrive at a settlement of the lawsuit, thereby ending further legal fees and related matters. Any settlement agreement would be submitted at a future Council meeting for review and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Not applicable. STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL Non Applicable - Administrative Item 479 CITY OF . HUNTINGTON BEACH