The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2026-08-18 Agenda PacketAGENDA City Council/Public Financing Authority Tuesday, August 18, 2026 3:30 PM - Closed Session 6:00 PM - Regular Meeting Council Chambers 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CASEY MCKEON, Mayor BUTCH TWINING, Mayor Pro Tem PAT BURNS, Councilman ANDREW GRUEL, Councilman DON KENNEDY, Councilman GRACEY VAN DER MARK, Council Woman CHAD WILLIAMS, Councilman STAFF TRAVIS HOPKINS, City Manager MIKE VIGLIOTTA, City Attorney LISA LANE BARNES, City Clerk JASON SCHMITT, City Treasurer VIEWING OPTIONS (Live or On-Demand): Members of the public may attend City Council meetings in person or view the proceedings remotely. Meetings are broadcast live on HBTV Channel 3 (replayed on Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. and Thursday at 6:00 p.m.). Live and archived meetings are available at : https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/calendar , https://bit.ly/SurfCityTV, or the City's YouTube Channel at https://www.youtube.com/cityofhb . Meetings may also be viewed on Roku, Fire TV or Apple device by downloading the Cablecast Screenweave App and searching for the City of Huntington Beach channel. PRESENTATION MATERIAL: If you plan to share printed materials during public speaking, please provide ten (10) paper copies. Materials may be delivered in person at the meeting or to the City Clerk ’s Office by 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Members of the audience and speakers shall not wear or display signs that obstruct the view of other audience members. Signs shall remain with the holder and shall not be placed in adjacent seats or in common areas. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Individuals wishing to speak during Public Comments on agendized or non-agendized items, including Closed Session and Public Hearings, may do so in person in the City Council Chambers or on Zoom IN PERSON SPEAKERS: To provide in-person comments during Public Comments on agendized and non-agendized items, please obtain a ticket number in the lobby beginning 30 minutes prior to the start of first scheduled meeting session. Only in-person speakers for Public Comments use the ticket system; they will be called in numerical order and asked to queue in the designated area. This ticket system is used solely to organize the meeting flow and determine the order in which speakers are recognized. CLOSED SESSION SPEAKERS: You do not need a ticket. At the designated time on the agenda, the Closed Session comment period will be announced, and speakers will be asked to queue in the designated area. PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS: You do not need a ticket. At the designated time on the agenda, the Public Hearing will be announced, and speakers will be asked to queue in the designated area. ZOOM SPEAKERS: To provide comments via Zoom for Closed Session, Public Comments, or Public Hearings, enter using Webinar ID 165 753 7311 or the provided link https://huntingtonbeachca.zoomgov.com/j/1657537311. You may also join by phone audio at (+1 415 449 4000) and entering the Webinar ID 165 753 7311. If you enter Zoom for the purpose of speaking during Closed Session, Public Comments or Public Hearing, you will be prompted by the City Clerk to raise your hand for each comment period. Speakers will be called by the identifier 1 they provided when entering Zoom and will receive a prompt to unmute. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION: Members of the public interested in commenting on agenda-related items may submit a written (supplemental) communication to the City Council via email at SupplementalComm@SurfCity-hb.org. Supplemental Communications are considered public record. Communications received by 5:00 PM Monday prior to the City Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council, posted to the City website, and announced at the City Council meeting, though not read. Please note that Supplemental Communications can only be submitted to SupplementalComm@SurfCity-HB.org. Communications received Monday after the 5:00 PM deadline will only be included in the administrative record. MEETING ASSISTANCE NOTICE: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, services are available to members of our community who require special assistance to participate in public meetings. If you require special assistance, 48-hour prior notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements for an assisted listening device (ALD) for the hearing impaired, American Sign Language interpreters, a reader during the meeting, and /or large- print agendas. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (714) 536-5227 or (714) 374-5390 for more information. 2 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 3:30 PM - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, Williams ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) PUBLIC COMMENTS - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS You do not need a ticket. At the designated time on the agenda, the Closed Session comment period will be announced, and speakers will be asked to queue in the designated area. To provide comments via Zoom for Closed Session, enter using Webinar ID 165 753 7311 or the provided link https://huntingtonbeachca.zoomgov.com/j/1657537311. You may also join by phone audio at (+1 415 449 4000) and entering the Webinar ID 165 753 7311. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a Councilmember on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the City Council's Administrative Assistant at (714) 536-5553 or emailing the entire City Council at city.council@surfcity-hb.org. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION 26-6901.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). 26-6912.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). 26-6923.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section Page 2 of 10 3 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Firefighters’ Association (HBFA). 26-6934.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Fire Management Association (FMA). 26-6945.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: APN Nos. 110-151-10 and 110-151-11. Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Gary Brian Turman (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. 26-6966.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(4).): One (1). 26-6977.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. 26-6988.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Smith (Christopher Scott) v. City of Huntington Beach; 30-2024-01376230-CU-WT-WJC. 26-6999.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01397379-CU-CR-NJC. Page 3 of 10 4 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 26-70010.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Grant Parks v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30-2024-01435113-CU-WM-CJC. 26-70111.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). O.H. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. ; OCSC Case No. 30-2026-015748940-CU-PO-CJC. 26-70712.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(2).): Two (2). 6:00 PM – COUNCIL CHAMBERS RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING ROLL CALL Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, Williams INVOCATION In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize or advance any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation. 26-66613.Huntington Beach Police and Fire Chaplain Roger Wing PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 26-70914.John Vasquez, American Legion Post 133 CLOSED SESSION REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) The Mayor will facilitate a voluntary opportunity for members of the Huntington Beach City Council to individually make brief comments to the public. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow for lengthy comments, discussion, or action on topics that are not on the agenda. ADOPTABLE PET OF THE MONTH BUSINESS HIGHLIGHT Page 4 of 10 5 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority 26-71315.Business Highlight Presentation COMMUNITY EVENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) Limited to one representative, one announcement This brief agenda segment is reserved for time-sensitive, organized events taking place within the City that are open to the public or support recognized community goals (e.g., nonprofit fundraisers, library programs, equestrian center events, City -sponsored activities). It is not a public-comment period and is not intended for individual solicitations, private parties, commercial promotions, or political campaigning. You do not need a ticket. At the designated time on the agenda, Community Events Announcements will be announced, and speakers will be asked to queue in the designated area. Community Events Announcements are only available in-person. ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) PUBLIC COMMENTS To provide in-person comments during Public Comments on agendized and non agendized-items, please obtain a ticket number in the lobby beginning 30 minutes prior to the start of first scheduled meeting session. Only in-person speakers for Public Comments use the ticket system; they will be called in numerical order and asked to queue in the designated area. This ticket system is used solely to organize the meeting flow and determine the order in which speakers are recognized. To provide comments via Zoom for Public Comments, enter using Webinar ID 165 753 7311 or the provided link https://huntingtonbeachca.zoomgov.com/j/1657537311. You may also join by phone audio at (+1 415 449 4000) and entering the Webinar ID 165 753 7311. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a Councilmember on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the City Council's Administrative Assistant at (714) 536-5553 or emailing the entire City Council at city.council@surfcity-hb.org. While the City Council welcomes public involvement and supports and defends free speech, the City Council rejects comments from anyone that are discriminatory, defamatory or otherwise not protected free speech. Those comments will not inform nor be considered by the City Council and may be cause for the Mayor to interrupt the public speaker. Such public comments will not be consented to or otherwise adopted by the City Council in its discussions and findings for any matter tonight. COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmembers may make brief announcements on any appointments made to a board, Page 5 of 10 6 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority committee, or commission. Councilmembers may not discuss or take any action on these announcements. Announcements are limited to 1 minute. AB 1234 REPORTING Per AB 1234 (Government Code Section 53232.3(d)) Councilmembers who attend a meeting, conference, or similar event at the expense of the City must provide a brief report of the meeting, conference, or similar event during the next regular City Council meeting. Reports are limited to 1 minute. OPENNESS IN NEGOTIATION DISCLOSURES Councilmembers must publicly disclose any meetings or communications with City employee associations, related to the negotiations of labor agreements. Disclosures are limited to 1 minute and must be made by the next regular City Council Meeting. PUBLIC HEARING For the benefit of the public, prior to a public hearing item, each member of the City Council will disclose any ex parte communications they may have had pertaining to the item. In simple terms, public hearings are quasi-judicial proceedings and the information used by the City Council to make its decisions should be limited to that which is obtained during the public hearing. Ex parte communications, then, means any information obtained outside of a public hearing. In such public hearing proceedings, the City Council must uphold constitutional and statutory due process rights of present and non-present parties by disclosing ex parte communications. Ex parte communications include oral and written information, as well as visual or auditory information obtained during a site visit. You do not need a ticket. At the designated time on the agenda, the Public Hearing comment period will be announced, and speakers will be asked to queue in the designated area. To provide comments via Zoom for Closed Session, enter using Webinar ID 165 753 7311 or the provided link https://huntingtonbeachca.zoomgov.com/j/1657537311. You may also join by phone audio at (+1 415 449 4000) and entering the Webinar ID 165 753 7311. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a Councilmember on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the City Council's Administrative Assistant at (714) 536-5553 or emailing the entire City Council at city.council@surfcity-hb.org. 26-67016.Public Hearing to Adopt Resolution No. 2026-34 authorizing an application for funds under the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program (EMSD) A) Conduct Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 2026-34, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing City Staff to apply to the Orange Recommended Action: Page 6 of 10 7 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority County Transportation Authority for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program to Purchase Accessible Vans to Transport Older Adults and People with Disabilities” for the Surf City Senior’s on the Go! Senior Transportation program;” and B) Authorize the appropriation of $43,560 from the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance to fulfill the 10% grant match requirement . CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 26-71417.Study Session: Landify 26-71518.Study Session: Proposed Improvements to Huntington Beach Sports Complex CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 19 - 25) City Clerk 26-67319.Approve and Adopt Minutes Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of July 21, 2026. Recommended Action: Community and Library Services 26-57320.Approve and authorize execution of a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for use of space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the “License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for Use of Space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park.” Recommended Action: Fire 26-65121.Authorize designated City staff to execute the agreement between the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Health Plan-Provider Agreement - Intergovernmental Transfer Rate Range Program Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach; and approve a payment of $1,017,485 to DHCS for FY 2026/27 Page 7 of 10 8 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority A) Authorize the designation of the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, and/or Fire Chief to execute the agreement between the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Health Plan-Provider Agreement - Intergovernmental Transfer Rate Range Program Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach; and B) Approve a payment of $1,017,485 to the California Department of Health Care Services for the agreement during FY 2025/26. Recommended Action: Police 26-65222.Approve and Authorize Execution of an Agreement with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Partner Law Enforcement Agencies to Participate in the Fiscal Year 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Grant Approve and authorize Police Chief Eric G. Parra to execute “Agreement for Fiscal Year 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG).” Recommended Action: 26-65423.Adopt Resolution No. 2026-33 Authorizing the Acceptance of FY26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) Funding from the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to support Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Enforcement and Officer Training Approve and authorize the execution of grant agreement FY26/27 CTFGP Law Enforcement-Huntington Beach Police Department and adopt Resolution No. 2026-33, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing the Chief of Police to Accept Grant Funds from the State of California Department of California Highway Patrol for DUI Saturation Patrols and Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) Training." Recommended Action: Public Works 26-64824.Amend Fiscal Year 2026/27 West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) Budget by $4,600,000 to Return Unexpended Cathodic Protection Program Funds to Member Agencies’ Water Enterprise Funds Based on Ownership Percentage Approve budget amendment and return funds to member agency’s water enterprise funds . Recommended Action: 26-64525.Approve Response Letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Page 8 of 10 9 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority Jury Report, “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water,” and Forward to the Presiding Judge A) Approve the City's response letter containing the findings and recommendations in response to the Orange County Grand Jury Report entitled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water”; and B) Authorize the Mayor to submit the response letter to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court. Recommended Action: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 26-65826.Introduction of the Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association Receive and consider the proposed Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association for the period of July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2029, pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Ordinance No. 4154. Recommended Action: 26-70627.Approval of the Design and Language for the America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza Approve the proposed design and inscription for the America 250 Celebration plaque at the Pier Plaza Memorial. Recommended Action: ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 26-66028.Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4350 amending Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10, Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64 and 10.68 relating to Vehicles and Traffic and Ordinance No. 4351 Chapter 13.08, Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080 relating to Beach Regulations A) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4350, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64, and 10.68 of Title 10 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Vehicles and Traffic.” B) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4351, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080 of Chapter 13.08 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Beach Regulations.” Recommended Action: ADJOURNMENT Page 9 of 10 10 AGENDA August 18, 2026City Council/Public Financing Authority The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority is Tuesday, September 1, 2026, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Page 10 of 10 11 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-690 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 12 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-691 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 13 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-692 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Firefighters’ Association (HBFA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 14 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-693 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Fire Management Association (FMA). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 15 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-694 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: APN Nos. 110-151-10 and 110-151-11. Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Gary Brian Turman (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 16 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-696 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9(d)(4).): One (1). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 17 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-697 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 18 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-698 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Smith (Christopher Scott) v. City of Huntington Beach; 30-2024- 01376230-CU-WT-WJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 19 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-699 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01397379-CU-CR-NJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 20 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-700 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Grant Parks v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30-2024- 01435113-CU-WM-CJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 21 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-701 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). O.H. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. ; OCSC Case No. 30-2026- 015748940-CU-PO-CJC. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 22 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-707 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code section 54956.9 (d)(2).): Two (2). City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 23 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-666 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Subject: Huntington Beach Police Chaplain Bob Ewing City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 24 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-709 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 John Vasquez, American Legion Post 133 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/12/2026Page 1 of 1 25 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-713 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Subject: Business Highlight Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 1 26 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-670 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services PREPARED BY:Kristin Martinez, Community & Library Services Manager Subject: Public Hearing to Adopt Resolution No. 2026-34 authorizing an application for funds under the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program (EMSD) Statement of Issue: There is a need to adopt Resolution No. 2026-34 authorizing staff to apply to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant (EMSD) to purchase accessible vans to transport older adults and people with disabilities for the Surf City Senior’s on the Go! Senior Transportation program. Financial Impact: The total EMSD grant request is $392,040, plus a 10% match requirement of approximately $43,560, for a total project cost of $435,600. Sufficient funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance to cover the 10% match requirement. Recommended Action: A) Conduct Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 2026-34, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing City Staff to apply to the Orange County Transportation Authority for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program to Purchase Accessible Vans to Transport Older Adults and People with Disabilities” for the Surf City Senior’s on the Go! Senior Transportation program;” and B) Authorize the appropriation of $43,560 from the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance to fulfill the 10% grant match requirement. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended actions and direct staff accordingly. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 3 27 File #:26-670 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Analysis: The Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Disabled Grant (EMSD) grant program is administered through the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The EMSD program is intended to support the needs of seniors and people with disabilities when transportation services are unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meet these needs. Funding from the grant would be used to support the City’s “Surf City Senior’s on the Go!” transportation program. “Surf City Senior’s on the Go!” is a grant and donation-based program that provides curb to curb transportation for Huntington Beach seniors aged 60 years and over from their homes to a variety of locations, such as nutrition services, medical appointments, shopping centers, social services, and the Senior Center in Central Park. As part of the grant application process, Resolution No. 2026-34 must be adopted at a public hearing (Attachment 1). As part of this requirement, staff sent a copy of the public notice via registered mail to several non-profit agencies (Attachment 2). The purpose of this notice is to inform interested people and/or non-profit providers of the opportunity to express support or opposition of the proposed grant application and proposed use of said grant during the public hearing portion of the August 18, 2026, City Council meeting. The proposed grant application would fund the purchase of three accessible vehicles to transport older adults and individuals with disabilities. The City needs newer, modern vehicles to continue providing this heavily utilized transportation program effectively. City staff propose purchasing two accessible vans, each capable of seating seven passengers or a combination of seated passengers and wheelchair users. The third vehicle would be a small accessible bus designed to accommodate up to 9 passengers, including both seated and wheelchair passengers. Acquiring these three new vehicles would allow the City to retire one older bus currently on standby, shift another aging bus into standby status, and maintain reliable transportation services for the older adults of Huntington Beach. The “Surf City Senior’s on the Go!” program in fiscal year 2025/2026 provided 23,000 trips and served over 500 unduplicated participants annually. Over 300 of those unduplicated participants have mobility limitations and use a mobility device. An appropriation of $43,560 is requested from the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance in order to fulfill the 10% match requirements of the grant. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. Resolution No. 2026-34, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing City Staff to Apply to the Orange County Transportation Authority for an Orange City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 3 28 File #:26-670 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 3 of 3 29 30 FILER Monica Molina monica.molina@surfcity-hb.org (714) 536-5227 FILING FOR The Orange County Register INTERIM AD DRAFT This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in The Orange County Register on the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (714) 796-7000 . Notice ID: kjVvStmPBMm1N1wYqpp0 | Proof Updated: Jul. 28, 2026 at 12:12pm PDT Notice Name: Public Notice OCTA EDMS Grant This is not an invoice. Below is an estimated price, and it is subject to change. You will receive an invoice with the final price upon invoice creation by the publisher. Columns Wide:6 Total Column Inches:29.07 Number of Lines:45 Ad Class:Legals 07/30/2026: City Notices 2391.08 Subtotal $2391.08 Tax $0.00 Processing Fee $0.00 Total $2391.08 See Proof on Next Page Public Notice OCTA EDMS Grant - Page 1 of 2 31 Public Notice OCTA EDMS Grant - Page 2 of 2 32 Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program (EMSD) August 18, 2026 33 Statement of Issue There is a need to adopt Resolution 2026-34 authorizing staff to apply to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant (EMSD) to purchase accessible vans to transport older adults and people with disabilities for the Surf City Senior’s on the Go! Senior Transportation program. 34 Financial Impact The total project cost is $435,600 •OTCA: $392,040 •10% match requirement: $43,560 If awarded, sufficient funds are available in the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance to cover the 10% match requirement. 35 Analysis The Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled (EMSD) Grant Program is administered through the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The EMSD program is intended to support the needs of seniors and people with disabilities when transportation services are unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meet these needs. 36 Analysis Funding from the grant would be used to support the City’s “Surf City Seniors on the Go!” Senior Transportation program. “Surf City Senior’s on the Go! is a donation-based program providing curb-to-curb transportation for Huntington Beach seniors aged 60 years and over from their homes to a variety of locations, such as nutrition services, medical appointments, shopping centers, social services, and the Senior Center in Central Park. 37 Analysis The proposed grant application is to purchase three accessible vehicles to transport older adults and people with disabilities. City staff propose purchasing: •Two accessible vans each capable of seating seven passengers or a combination of seated passengers and wheelchair users. •One small accessible bus designed to accommodate up to 9 passengers, including both seated and wheelchair passengers. 38 Analysis Acquiring these three new vehicles would allow the City to retire one older bus currently kept on standby, shift another aging bus into standby status, and maintain reliable transportation services for the older adults of Huntington Beach. In FY 2025/26, Surf City Seniors on the Go! Provided: •23,000 free trips •Over 500 unduplicated passengers 39 Analysis As part of the grant application, OCTA requires the City to: •Publicly notice the intent to apply for the grant •Directly notify private non-profit transportation providers via registered mail •Conduct a public hearing •Adopt a resolution 40 Recommended Action •Adopt Resolution No. 2026-34 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing City Staff to apply to the Orange County Transportation Authority for an Orange County Enhanced Mobility for Seniors & Disabled Grant Program to Purchase Accessible Vans to Transport Older Adults and People with Disabilities” for the Surf City Senior’s on the Go! Senior Transportation Program; and, •Authorize the Appropriation of $43,560 form the Equipment Replacement Fund 325 fund balance to fulfill the 10% grant match requirement. 41 Questions? 42 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-714 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Subject: Study Session: Landify Attachment(s): 1. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 1 43 Landify Study Session August 18, 2026 44 Purpose of Study Session The purpose of the Study Session is to collect feedback from City Council regarding entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) authorizing Landify to conduct a feasibility study to enhance an undeveloped area of Huntington Central Park East. 45 Landify’s Background • Parent company, ECT, has 50-year operating history • Over 100 sites completed in France and Europe • Starting from highly diverse site conditions—including derelict sites, polluted industrial brownfields, quarries, illegal dumpsites, degraded sites, and environmentally sensitive areas • ECT has successfully transformed these sites into a wide range of high-quality projects, including parks, recreational areas, equestrian centers, and renewable energy facilities 46 Landify’s Background • Landify is working on more than 12 projects in California including: • San Francisco Bay • Chula Vista • Palm Springs • Vacaville • Orange • Poway 47 Business Model • Upcycle excavated inert soils from urban construction for the creation of land-use projects for local communities and partners • Deliver open space projects at little or no cost for municipalities • Full traceability and risk monitoring processes • A unique Public Private Partnership • Landify will coordinate the study with all relevant regulatory agencies 48 Landify - What They Do 49 Project Example Vacaville Conceptual Plan 50 Proposed Area of Focus Huntington Central Park East Gun Range • 8 Acres (approximate) • Currently unusable space due to contaminants in the soil • Land Use Designation OS-PR 51 Next Steps • If Council is interested in moving forward with an MOU, staff will develop an MOU for Landify to complete a feasibility study evaluating the potential transformation of Sully Miller Lake / Former Gun Range into future park and open-space • The MOU will be brought back to City Council for approval at a future meeting date • Once complete, staff will bring the feasibility study back to City Council for consideration of an agreement for Landify to perform project. 52 Questions? 53 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-715 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Subject: Study Session: Proposed Improvements to Huntington Beach Sports Complex Attachment(s): 1. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 1 54 Sports Complex Follow-up: Finance Commission Recommendation August 18, 2026 55 Background •On July 7, 2026, a presentation was provided to City Council regarding proposed improvements to the Huntington Beach Sports Complex (Sports Complex) by City staff and HBSC Partners, LLC. •City Council unanimously voted to refer the proposed improvements of the Sports Complex to the Finance Commission for review and direct staff to assist in providing the Finance Commission Sub Task Committee with the data they need to provide a written recommendation to City Council by the August 18 City Council meeting, including concurrent dialogue with HBSC Partners, LLC. •The Finance Commission Sub Task Committee is comprised of Commissioners Boomgarten, Chennault and Geery. 56 Meeting Dates Since July 7, staff have attended the following meetings: •Monday, July 13: Sub-Committee Meeting •Monday, July 20: Sub-Committee Meeting •Wednesday, July 22: Finance Commission Regular Meeting •Monday, July 27: Sub-Committee Meeting •Wednesday, July 29: Sports Complex Methane Monitoring System Meeting •Wednesday, August 5: Finance Commission Special Meeting 57 August 5 Finance Commission Special Meeting The Sub-Committee presented the following recommendations, which were approved by the Finance Commission for recommendation for City Council Consideration: 1.CEQA first, no agreements until complete 2.Issue an RFI to maximize value and resident benefit 3.All upgrades must follow City procurement rules 4.Establish minimum base rent + revenue share 5.Modernize parking & field use rates 6.Independent Audit of HBSC Partners’ three agreements 7.Move agreement oversight to Treasury/Legal engagement 8.Public engagement before any facility changes 58 1. CEQA First, No Agreements Until Complete Background •HBSC Proposed Changes: HBSC Partners has proposed significant upgrades and operational changes •CEQA Requirements: Because the Sports Complex sits atop a former county landfill with an aging methane management system, it is expected most proposed changes will require CEQA review •CEQA Timeline: CEQA can take 3 months to over a year, or longer. •City Oversight: Jennifer Villasenor with CLS and Legal, is leading the CEQA process Recommendation •Do not execute any agreements, contracts or MOUs until CEQA is fully complete and the City understands what is permissible and at what cost. •HBSC Partners should pay for all CEQA -related costs (scope, studies, environmental services), not the City. Finance Commission Recommendation 59 2. Issue a RFI to Maximize Value and Resident Benefit Background •Upgrade Potential: The City recognizes there are significant opportunities for expanded uses and upgrades. •Resident & Revenue Goals: The City seeks increased resident benefit and increased revenue. •Operator Market: Many qualified operators would be interested in managing the Sports Complex. Finance Commission Recommendation 60 2. Issue a RFI to Maximize Value and Resident Benefit Recommendation •Issue a RFI immediately to ensure the City receives the best possible suggested upgrades, alternative usage options, improved operational and revenue performance, and enhanced value that improves revenue to the City and usage by, and value to residents. •Require a formal response by HBSC Partners so City has a formal proposal for review and consideration. •Responses should be evaluated by CLS, Legal, Environmental, Finance, CLS Commission, and the Finance Commission to determine whether continuing with HBSC Partners beyond 9/27/27 is in the City’s best interest. Finance Commission Recommendation 61 3. All Upgrades Must Follow City Procurement Rules Background •City Ownership: The Sports Complex is a City-owned public asset. •Major Upgrades: Proposed upgrades are multimillion-dollar capital improvements. Recommendation •All approved upgrades and changes must follow City procurement processes, ensuring transparency, competitive bidding, and compliance with City code and charter and state and federal requirements. Finance Commission Recommendation 62 4. Establish Minimum Base Rent + Revenue Share Background •Current Financial Burden: The Sports Complex currently costs the City roughly $1 million per year. •No minimum Rent: The existing agreement does not include a minimum monthly rent. Recommendation •Create a new agreement requiring a guaranteed minimum base rent to ensure positive cashflow. •Add a revenue-sharing structure above the base rent to reward strong operator performance. Finance Commission Recommendation 63 5. Modernize Parking & Field Use Rates Background •Rate Restrictions: Operators must adhere to fixed parking and field-use rates. •Market Flexibility: Operators believe significant additional revenue is possible with market-based pricing. Recommendation •Consider removing rate restrictions and direct staff and the Finance Commission to develop new market-aligned rates for parking and field use. •Determine equitable revenue split between the City and operator. •Finance Commission works with staff to create an agreement framework that is enforceable and in the City and resident’s best interest. Finance Commission Recommendation 64 6. Independent Audit of HBSC Partners’ Three Agreements Background •HBSC Partners currently holds three agreements: •Sports Complex Operations •Concessions Lease •Outer Field Maintenance •The Finance Commission has noted non-compliance concerns. •Self-reported revenue has never been independently validated, despite rent being based on revenue percentages. Finance Commission Recommendation 65 6. Independent Audit of HBSC Partners’ Three Agreements Recommendation •Conduct an independent audit of financial reporting and operational compliance across all three agreements. •Audit should be directed by the Finance Commission with assistance from City staff. •Refer any breaches to Legal for remediation, termination, or recovery of funds as appropriate. •Note: Audit recommendation attached as separate document – this was approved by Finance Commission. Finance Commission Recommendation 66 7. Move Agreements Oversight to Treasury/Legal Engagement Background •Enforcement Issues: Current agreements have not been consistently enforced. •Staff Limitations: Weekly meetings occur, but enforcement actions have not been taken or escalated. Recommendation •Move management of HBSC agreements to Bill Krill’s team and Legal. •Also move oversight of Equestrian Center, Meadowlark and Yacht Club agreements under the same structure. •Place Bill Krill’s team under Treasury leadership for stronger financial oversight. Finance Commission Recommendation 67 8. Public Engagement Before Any Facility Changes Background •Lack of Public Review: HBSC Partners has worked with staff for two years on proposed upgrades without public review. Recommendation •Engage an independent facilitator to conduct public meetings on all proposed changes. •No changes to facilities or operations should proceed until public feedback is collected. •Findings should be reported to City Council, Finance Commission and CLS Staff and CLS Commission. Finance Commission Recommendation 68 City Council Feedback Staff requests City Council direction on the following: •Finance Commission Recommendations •Continued dialogue with HBSC Partners •Any other feedback 69 Questions? 70 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-673 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Lane Barnes, City Clerk PREPARED BY:Lisa Lane Barnes, City Clerk Subject: Approve and Adopt Minutes Statement of Issue: The City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of July 21, 2026 require review and approval. Financial Impact: None Recommended Action: Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of July 21, 2026. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve and/or request revision(s). Analysis: None Environmental Status: Non-Applicable Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): July 21, 2026, CC/PFA regular meeting minutes City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 1 71 Regular Meeting Minutes City Council/Public Financing Authority City of Huntington Beach Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:00 PM — Council Chambers 6:00 PM — Council Chambers Civic Center, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 A video recording of the 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM portions of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and archived at https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx 4:00 PM — COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER — 4:00 PM ROLL CALL Present: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION (Received After Agenda Distribution) — None PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS — None Mayor McKeon read titles for Closed Session Items #1 (26-611), #2 (26-612), #3 (26-613), #4 (26- 614), and #5 (26-627) regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators for Employee Organizations: Huntington Beach Police Officers' Association (HBPOA), Police Management Association (PMA), Huntington Beach Firefighters' Association (HBFA), Fire Management Association (FMA) and Management Employees' Organization (MEO); Item #6 (26-619) and #7 (26-620) Conference with Real Property Negotiators: 17732 Goldenwest St., dba Park Bench Cafe, and 21091 Pacific Coast Highway, dba Pasea Hotel and Spa, price and terms of payment. A motion was made by Van Der Mark, with a second by McKeon, to recess to Closed Session. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION — 4:03 PM CLOSED SESSION 1. 26-611 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA). 2. 26-612 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: 72 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 2 of 11 Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA). 3. 26-613 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Huntington Beach Firefighters’ Association (HBFA). 4. 26-614 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Fire Management Association (FMA). 5. 26-627 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54957.6.) Agency designated representatives: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; also in attendance: Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Mike Vigliotta, City Attorney and Zack Zithisakthanakul, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Employee Organization: Management Employees’ Organization (MEO). 6. 26-619 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: 17732 Goldenwest St, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (APN 111-010-69). Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Michael and Christina Bartusick dba Park Bench Cafe and Rory Bevins (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. 7. 26-620 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code section 54956.8.) Property: 21091 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (APN 024-281- 16). Agency Negotiators: Travis Hopkins, City Manager; Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager; Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community and Library Services; Chris Cole, Community and Library Services Manager; William Krill, Real Estate Project Manager. Negotiating parties: Pouya Honari - Pacific City Hotel, LLC dba Pasea Hotel and Spa (Not Present). Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment. 8. 26-615 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). People of the State of California/Bonta v. City of Huntington Beach, et al.; Case No. 30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC. 9. 26-616 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01397379-CU- CR-NJC. 10. 26-617 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Smith (Christopher Scott) v. City of Huntington Beach; 30-2024-01376230-CU-WT-WJC. 73 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 3 of 11 11. 26-618 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Bauer-Oldfield (Ashley) v. City of Huntington Beach; 8:24-cv-02700-CAS-JDE. 12. 26-623 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION. (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9). Carroll (Kasey) v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No.: 30-2025-01502970-CU-PA-NJC. 6:00 PM — COUNCIL CHAMBERS RECONVENED CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING — 6:05 PM ROLL CALL Present: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams Absent: None INVOCATION In permitting a nonsectarian invocation, the City does not intend to proselytize or advance any faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation. 13. 26-624 Chaplain Jericho Rhoten PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 14. 26-625 Mike Ali, American Legion Post 133 CLOSED SESSION REPORT BY CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Mike Vigliotta announced that City Council unanimously approved the City filing an appeal to the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach; OCSC Case No. 30-2024-01397379-CU-CR-NJC. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) Mayor Pro Tem Twining described his observations and interactions with the protestors and their signs recently at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street and apologized for not controlling his own response in the heat of the moment; Councilmember Burns reminded everyone that the US Open of Surfing returns to Surf City USA from July 25 through August 2, including the Surfing Hall of Fame and Surfing Walk of Fame; Council Woman Van Der Mark announced the International Surfing Museum Grand Opening on Friday, July 24, 2026, 5:00 – 7:00 p.m., at 525 Main Street; Councilmember Williams wished his son, Noah, Happy 11th Birthday; Councilmember Kennedy provided a follow-up report regarding Bright Star School in the Ocean View School District; and Mayor McKeon acknowledged Old World for providing a local venue to watch Soccer World Cup games. ADOPTABLE PET OF THE MONTH 74 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 4 of 11 Denise Woodside and volunteer Dawn, OC Animal Care, presented two adoptable pets, Frost and Isabel. Details can be found at www.OCPetInfo.com. BUSINESS HIGHLIGHT 15. 26-608 Business Highlight Presentation Mayor McKeon acknowledged two newly opened businesses in Huntington Beach: Bacio de Latte at Bella Terra, and Pizza Factory at 19913 Beach Blvd. at Adams. He also showcased the Top 25 Sales Tax Producers — Q1 2026 for Huntington Beach. Minute with the Mayor videos were played to recognize Jersey Mike's Subs’ newest location at Yorktown and Goldenwest, and Vanity Compound Medical Aesthetics at Peter's Landing. Support local businesses and keep Surf City thriving. COMMUNITY EVENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS (2-Minute Time Limit) Limited to one representative, one announcement — 1 Speaker Jason Schmitt, City Treasurer, announced the Financial Literacy and Workforce Development training workshops begin July 27, 12 PM, at Goldenwest College. This is a free program offered for individuals from 18 – 28 years old living in Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove or Westminster. ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution) — None PUBLIC COMMENTS (3-Minute Time Limit) — 19 Speakers The number [hh:mm:ss] following the speakers' comments indicates their approximate starting time in the archived video located at https://huntingtonbeach.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. Dave Chennault, Huntington Beach Finance Commissioner, announced the next meeting of the Finance Commission at 4:00 PM, Wednesday, July 22, 2026, in Council Chambers, to discuss issues related to the Sports Complex. (00:32:55) Robin Augustine, a resident living near Edinger and Belfast, commented on multiple automobile accidents that have happened in front of her home, and requested that a stop light be installed on Edinger at Belfast to prevent any more accidents. Mayor McKeon asked Ms. Augustine to complete a blue card for follow-up. (00:34:03) Cathy Karrick commented on a social media video regarding a recent Huntington Beach incident. (00:37:26) Amory Hanson commented on Council Member Items #31 (26-638) regarding America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza. (00:38:56) Tim Geddes commented on the need to keep the community informed regarding Closed Session items; Consent Calendar Item #21 (26-607) regarding response letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report related to State Housing Mandates; Council Member Items #31 (26-638) regarding America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza, and the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (00:39:30) 75 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 5 of 11 Unnamed Speaker commented on her appreciation for the epic 4th of July celebration. (00:42:32) Kanan Durham commented on the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (00:44:02) Linda Diaz commented on her appreciation for the 4th of July and 250th Celebration festivities. (00:46:46) Andy Einhorn commented on the great July 4th parade and on City Council actions. (00:48:46) Bethany Webb commented on the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (00:52:00) Unnamed Speaker commented on technology, social media and efforts to return to pencil and paper for school children. (00:55:22) Chris Kluwe commented on the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (00:58:37) Lou Maturino commented on politics in the United States. (01:01:55) Unnamed Speaker commented on his experience with excessive space rental fees in Huntington Beach. (01:03:23) Jignesh Padhiar commented on Council Member Items #31 (26-638) regarding America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza and the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (01:06:32) Linda Rodriguez, Orange County Women's Business Chamber, Board Member for Media Affairs, invited Councilmembers to attend an upcoming meeting to facilitate communication with Huntington Beach women business owners. (01:08:47) Unnamed Speaker commented on the continuously closed entrance gate at Overlook Park. (01:09:50) Russell Neal commented on Consent Calendar Item #21 (26-607) regarding response letter to the 2025- 2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report related to State Housing Mandates. (01:11:18) Chris Rini commented on the recent demonstration at the intersection of Yorktown and Main Street. (01:13:52) COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT ANNOUNCEMENTS — None AB 1234 REPORTING — None OPENNESS IN NEGOTIATION DISCLOSURES — None CITY MANAGER’S REPORT 16. 26-635 Heard Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Updates 76 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 6 of 11 Travis Hopkins, City Manager, introduced Public Works Director Chau Vu who presented a PowerPoint communication titled CIP Project Summary Report — Zone 3 Overlay with slides entitled Project Summary; Project Benefits and Schedule; Financial Project Summary; Conclusion/Photos; CIP Project Summary Report — HBPD Women's Locker Room; Project Summary; Video Walkthrough; Project Benefits and Schedule; Financial Project Summary; and Conclusion/Photos. Councilmembers and Director Vu briefly discussed the pavement repair schedule and noted that the Public Works website will be kept updated as projects are completed; reviewed the budget numbers for the HBPD women's locker room project; confirmed that unknown situations or conditions that are discovered during a project must be addressed through change orders, especially when updating facilities built in the 1970s; and received confirmation that both vendors successfully completed these projects within expected timeframes and allotted budgets. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT 17. 26-633 Heard City Attorney’s Update on the Community Prosecutor Program City Attorney Mike Vigliotta presented a PowerPoint communication titled Community Prosecutor Program Update with slides entitled: History of the Community Prosecutor Program (3); Mission Statement; Program Goals; Success of the Community Prosecutor Program (2); The Community Prosecutor; Common State Crimes California Penal Code; Petty Theft (3), Resisting/Obstructing Police Officers Penal Code § 148(a)(1) (3); Trespassing Penal Code §602(o)(1); Illegal Lodging Penal Code §647(e); Common Local Crimes Huntington Beach Municipal Code; Unlawful Camping Huntington Beach Municipal Code §13.10.030(A); Diversion for Homeless Individuals; Proposition 36; A Prosecutor’s Duty to Victims; Case Statistics July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026; and Community Prosecutor Program Update. Mayor McKeon summarized that in the last four years there has been a reduction in homeless numbers and crime is down over 27%; discussion continued on how Councilmembers could enhance the Prosecutor Program, including additional discussions with the District Attorney for expanding the types of crimes this program can administer, and the possibility of additional staff; it appears this program is a great deterrent; unfortunately crime will never be reduced to zero; the public should always reach out through the Police Department, not the City's Prosecutor Program, for any signs of potential criminal activity; issues are not handled in the Prosecutor Program until there is evidence of a crime and the situation has been forwarded through the Police Department; Huntington Beach is known for a strong and effective Police, Fire, Marine Safety, Public Works and City Attorney Departments which work as a team to keep the City safe and clean; Huntington Beach and Anaheim are the only cities in Orange County with known city prosecutor programs that process penal code, in addition to municipal code, violations; the District Attorney currently handles violations by minors such as eBike infractions, and any changes to the current plan would have to include discussions with the District Attorney. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 18 - 29) Travis Hopkins, City Manager, withdrew to a date uncertain, Consent Calendar Item #27 (26-585) regarding abandonment of Old Pirate Drive private water well project for administrative completion. Mayor Pro Tem Twining tabled Consent Calendar Item #19 (26-610) regarding the appointment of Debbie Iorio to the City Celebration Committee. City Clerk 18. 26-634 Approved and Adopted Minutes 77 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 7 of 11 A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority special meeting minutes of July 1, 2026, and regular meeting minutes of July 7, 2026. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None City Manager 19. 26-610 TABLED the appointment of Debbie Iorio to the City Celebration Committee as recommended by City Council Liaisons Mayor McKeon and Mayor Pro Tem Twining Community Development 20. 26-600 Adopted Resolution No. 2026-32 Confirming Cost Report for Weed Abatement on Private Parcels Within the City for the 2026 Season A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to adopt Resolution No. 2026-32 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Confirming the Report of the Public Works Director Regarding the Cost for Weed Abatement on Private Property Within the City for the 2026 Season," and direct that all charges listed thereon be certified to the Orange County 2026/27 Property Tax Roll. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 21. 26-607 Approved Response Letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report Related to State Housing Mandates and Forward to the Presiding Judge A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve the City's response letter to the Orange County Grand Jury Report entitled "California Housing Mandates, The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods"; and authorize the City Manager to submit the response letter to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None Community and Library Services 22. 26-377 Approved and authorized execution of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and License to Utilize Certain Space between the City of Huntington Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 78 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 8 of 11 A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the "Memorandum of Understanding and License to Use Certain Space Between the City of Huntington Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian." The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 23. 26-621 Approved the Design Concept and Placement of a Memorial Plaque Honoring Kolby Aipa on Tower Zero of the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve the design concept and placement of a memorial plaque honoring Kolby Aipa on Tower Zero of the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None Fire 24. 26-583 Approved response letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report "Wildfires Hit Home" and forward to the Presiding Judge A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve the City's response letter with findings and recommendations to the Orange County Grand Jury Report entitled "Wildfires Hit Home"; and authorize the Mayor to submit the response letter to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None Police 25. 26-596 Approved Annual Military Equipment Use Report (AB 481) A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve report and renew Ordinance No. 4255, authorizing the continued use of the listed military equipment by the Police Department; and find that each type of military equipment identified in that report attached hereto as Attachment 1 complies with the following standards for approval: 1.) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. 2.) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. 3.) Any future purchased equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. 4.) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance. 79 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 9 of 11 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None Public Works 26. 26-571 Approved and Authorized the Execution of a Professional Services Contract with Partners In Control, Inc. DBA Enterprise Automation in the Amount of $2,500,000 for On-Call Engineering Services for the Public Works Utilities Division Supervisory Control and Data Acquisitions (SCADA) Systems for a Three-Year Term A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a $2,500,000 Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Enterprise Automation for On-Call Engineering Services for Water and Wastewater SCADA Systems for a three-year term. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 27. 26-585 WITHDRAWN TO A DATE UNCERTAIN Lowest Responsive and Responsible Bid and Award Construction Contract to Living Water Industries, LLC., in the amount of $34,750.00 for the Abandonment of Old Pirate Drive Private Water Well Project, CC- 1624 28. 26-598 Accepted Lowest Responsive and Responsible Bid and Awarded Construction Contract to R.E. Schultz Construction, Inc. in the amount of $397,299.00 for the Drew Park and Robinwood Park Playground Improvements, CC1859 and CC1823 A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid submitted by R.E. Schultz Construction, Inc. in the amount of $397,298.35; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to approve change orders up to ten percent (10%) of the contract amount in potential construction change orders; and, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a construction contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None 29. 26-599 Accepted Lowest Responsive and Responsible Bid and Awarded a Construction Contract to Universal Coatings, Inc. in the amount of $97,000 for the Oak View Branch Library Roof Restoration, CC1912 A motion was made by Burns, second McKeon, to accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid submitted by Universal Coatings, Inc. in the amount of $97,000; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to approve construction change orders within the approved contingency amount of ten percent 80 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 10 of 11 (10%) of the contract amount; and, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a construction contract in a form approved by the City Attorney. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gruel, Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, Van Der Mark, and Williams NOES: None ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 30. 26-636 Approved the Appointment of Zack Zithisakthanakul to the Position of Chief Financial Officer and Authorized the City Manager to Execute the Employment Agreement Travis Hopkins, City Manager, provided a brief background on Mr. Zithisankthanakul's professional history before introducing Assistant City Manager Marissa Sur who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Chief Financial Officer Employment Agreement, with slides entitled: Contract Overview, and Questions? NOTE: Councilmembers Gruel and Williams both left the room during the presentation and returned to the dais after the vote was taken. A motion was made by Burns, second Van Der Mark, to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the "Employment Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Zack Zithisakthanakul" for the position of Chief Financial Officer. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, and Van Der Mark NOES: None ABSENT/OUT OF ROOM: Gruel, and Williams COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS 31. 26-638 Approved, as amended, Item submitted by Councilman Kennedy, Mayor McKeon, and Councilman Burns — America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza Councilmember Kennedy introduced this item by reviewing the Issue Statement Councilmember Williams clarified why Resolution No. 2017-25 was set aside and shared his concerns regarding the need to include time for the public as well as the Library and Community Services Commission, Historic Resources Board and other Councilmembers to weigh in on this project. An amended motion was made by Kennedy, second McKeon, to set aside Resolution No. 2017-25 and direct staff to create the engraving template for review by Councilmembers Kennedy, Burns and McKeon, with final a working draft brought forward for vote on the August 18th City Council Meeting for the monument in Pier Plaza to commemorate the Huntington Beach America 250 Celebrations, as amended to include conversations with the Historic Resources Board members and Library and Community Services commissioners. 81 City Council/PFA Regular Meeting Minutes July 21, 2026 Page 11 of 11 The motion failed due to the successful roll call vote following the substitute for the substitute motion. A substitute motion was made by Williams, that the proposed America 250 monument and plaque at Pier Plaza be processed in accordance with Resolution 2017-25 and that the matter be referred to the Historic Resources Board and Community and Library Services Commission for review and recommendation back to the City Council. The substitute motion failed due to lack of a second. A substitute to the substitute motion was made by McKeon, second Burns, to set aside Resolution No. 2017-25 and direct staff to create the engraving template for review by Councilmembers Kennedy, Burns and McKeon, with a working draft brought forward for further discussions and vote on the August 18th City Council Meeting for the monument in Pier Plaza to commemorate the Huntington Beach America 250 Celebration, as amended to include concurrent input from Historic Resources Board members and Library and Community Services commissioners. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kennedy, Twining, McKeon, Burns, and Van Der Mark NOES: Gruel, and Williams Mayor McKeon recognized the service of Former Mayor Joseph Carchio who recently passed away and expressed condolences to Mr. Carchio's family. The City will hold a Celebration of Life event in August to recognize Mr. Carchio’s decades of service to Huntington Beach. ADJOURNMENT — At 8:12 PM a motion was made by Burns, with a second by Van Der Mark, to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority on Tuesday, August 4, 2026, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov _______________________________________ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and Secretary of the Public Financing Authority of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk-Secretary ______________________________________ Mayor-Chair 82 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-573 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services PREPARED BY:Kristin Martinez, Community & Library Services Manager Subject: Approve and authorize execution of a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for use of space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park Statement of Issue: The City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church seek to establish a three-year agreement, with two optional one-year extensions, through approval of a License Agreement for Saddleback Church’s continued weekly use of meeting space at the Senior Center in Central Park. The Agreement would clearly define facility use, fees, and rental obligations while generating consistent rental revenue to the City’s General Fund, supporting operational cost recovery, long term fiscal sustainability, and the continuation of a productive partnership with a local nonprofit serving Huntington Beach residents. Financial Impact: The Agreement with Saddleback Church will generate anticipated, ongoing annual revenues of $157,500 for the City over a three-year term, with the option of two (2) additional one-year renewals. Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the “License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for Use of Space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park.” Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: Saddleback Church has utilized City facilities since 2024 to conduct weekly rentals. In 2025, the City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 3 83 File #:26-573 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 ·Providing an offsite storage facility, loading all equipment in and out of the facility for each rental. ·Notify the City thirty (30) days in advance of any rental cancellation. ·Follow all City rental procedures and policies. ·Provide monthly payment fourteen (14) days after receipt of invoice for Saddleback Church’s facility use from the previous month. General obligations of the City include: ·Providing rental space and city staff to facilitate room setups and opening and closing of the Senior Center. ·Provide Saddleback Church with at least thirty (30) days’ notice if a reservation requires cancellation. ·Provide toiletries for restroom use, cleaning supplies, tables, chairs and A/V equipment. ·Invoicing Saddleback Church monthly for the previous month’s facility use. The FY 2025/26 City Council approved fee schedule can be found in Exhibit B of the Agreement. Providing a nominal discount rate ensures stable weekly use of the Senior Center while generating consistent annual revenue and strengthening a long-term partnership with a nonprofit that serves Huntington Beach residents. ·Rentals occurring Friday - Sunday, a discounted rental rate will be applied to the current City Council approved hourly rates. ·Rentals occurring Monday - Thursday, will be assessed the current City Council approved rates, and no discounts will be applied. ·Year 1: 10% discount. ·Years 2 & 3: 7% discount. o At year 3, upon mutual agreement, the City and Saddleback Church will discuss and evaluate rate adjustments if a disparity exists between the market rate and Saddleback Church’s discounted rate. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 3 84 File #:26-573 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 ·Years 4 & 5: 5% discount. ·Late payments: the fees for that month will revert to the current, full City Council approved fee schedule, and future rentals may be subject to suspension. Approval of this Agreement will allow the City to preserve an effective partnership, support consistent facility use, and ensure reliable ongoing annual proposed revenues of $157,500 supporting the General Gund. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. RCA Contract Agreement Summary Saddleback Church 2. License Agreement Saddleback Church 3. Saddleback Church Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 3 of 3 85 RCA Contract Agreement Summary CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VENDOR NAME + TYPE OF SERVICE CONTRACT INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION TYPE OF AGREEMENT (Professional Services, Service Agreement) PROCUREMENT SCOPE OF WORK TOTAL COMPENSATION TERM OF CONTRACT/AGREEMENT OTHER: Bonds, Special Contract Terms, Emergency DATE PRESENTED REQUESTING DEPARTMENT STAFF CONTACT(S)INSURANCE STATUS 8/18/2026 Current - expires 4/18/2027 Community & Library Services Ashley Wysocki and Kristin Martinez City to received $157,500 annually for 3-years 3 years with option of 2 1-year renewals Saddleback Church for use of space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park. License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for use of space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park. Not applicable. Saddleback Church has conducted weekly rentals at City facilities since 2024. In 2025, they began renting meeting space at the Senior Center to accommodate its growing needs. Not applicable. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 License Agreement between the City and Saddleback Church August 18, 2026 103 Background Saddleback Church has utilized City facilities since 2024 to conduct weekly rentals. In 2025, the organization began renting meeting space at the Senior Center in Central Park (Senior Center) to accommodate its growing operational and attendance needs. Saddleback Church now seeks to formalize this ongoing arrangement through a License Agreement, ensuring continued access to the facility in a structured and consistent manner. The City of Huntington Beach likewise seeks to formalize the agreement to establish clear terms, strengthen the existing partnership, and secure stable rental revenue for a three-year term with two (2) optional one-year extensions. 104 Financial Impact The License Agreement with Saddleback Church will generate anticipated, ongoing annual revenues of $157,500 for the City over a three-year term, with the option for two (2) additional one - year renewals. 105 •Providing rental space and city staff to facilitate room setups and opening and closing of the Senior Center. •Provide Saddleback Church with at least thirty (30) days’ notice if a reservation requires cancellation. •Provide toiletries for restroom use, cleaning supplies, tables, chairs and A/V equipment. •Invoicing Saddleback Church monthly for the previous month’s facility use. Obligations of the City 106 The FY 2025/26 City Council approved fee schedule can be found in Exhibit B of the License Agreement. Providing a nominal discount rate ensures stable weekly use of the Senior Center while generating consistent revenue and strengthening a long-term partnership with a nonprofit that serves Huntington Beach residents. •Rentals occurring Friday – Sunday, a discounted rental rate will be applied to the current City Council approved hourly rates. •Rentals occurring Monday – Thursday, will be assessed the current City Council approved rates, and no discounts will be applied. Obligations of the City Continued 107 •Year 1: 10% discount. •Years 2 & 3: 7% discount. o At year 3, upon mutual agreement, the City and Saddleback Church will discuss and evaluate rate adjustments if a disparity exists between the market rate and Saddleback’s discounted rate. •Years 4 & 5: 5% discount. •Late payments: the fees for that month will revert to the current, full City Council approved fee schedule, and future rentals may be subject to suspension. Obligations of the City Continued 108 •Providing an offsite storage facility, loading all equipment in and out of the facility for each rental. •Notify the City thirty (30) days in advance of any rental cancellation. •Follow all City rental procedures and policies. •Provide monthly payment fourteen (14) days after receipt of invoice for Saddleback Church’s facility use from the previous month. Obligations of Saddleback Church 109 Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the ‘License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Saddleback Church for Use of Space at the Huntington Beach Senior Center in Central Park.” Recommended Action 110 Questions? 111 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-651 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Eric McCoy, Fire Chief PREPARED BY:Kevin Justen, Senior Management Analyst Subject: Authorize designated City staff to execute the agreement between the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Health Plan-Provider Agreement - Intergovernmental Transfer Rate Range Program Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach; and approve a payment of $1,017,485 to DHCS for FY 2026/27 Statement of Issue: City Council is requested to designate and authorize the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, and/or Fire Chief to execute the agreement between the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Health Plan-Provider Agreement - Intergovernmental Transfer Rate Range Program Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach and approve a payment of $1,017,485 to DHCS. Financial Impact: Funding in the amount of $1,017,485 has been included in the FY 2026/27 Budget for participation in the program. With these agreements and Huntington Beach’s payment of $1,017,485, it is anticipated that an estimated $2,314,890 in funds will be distributed to Huntington Beach, resulting in a net revenue of approximately $1,297,405 for additional reimbursement of Medi-Cal Managed Care services that were incurred and unreimbursed for the service period of January 1, 2025 through December 3, 2025. Recommended Action: A) Authorize the designation of the City Manager, Chief Financial Officer, and/or Fire Chief to execute the agreement between the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Health Plan-Provider Agreement - Intergovernmental Transfer Rate Range Program Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach; and B) Approve a payment of $1,017,485 to the California Department of Health Care Services for the agreement during FY 2025/26. City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 2 112 File #:26-651 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended actions(s), and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: Since the 2022/23 fiscal year, the City of Huntington Beach has participated in the Voluntary Rate Range Intergovernmental Transfer Program (VRRP IGT) through the California Department of Health Care Services. This program allows the City to recover unreimbursed City costs for service to CalOptima patients. DHCS distributes the funds to eligible entities through CalOptima Health. The City’s ongoing participation in the program is dependent on available funding for the program and the City’s ability to provide the upfront contribution required. The net revenue received annually by the City is also dependent on a number of factors, including the number of program participants in the County and the number of Medi-Cal calls for service. If the City Council approves the recommended actions, the agreement with DHCS would require an upfront payment of $1,017,485. Once paid, an estimated $2,314,890 will be disbursed to Huntington Beach within approximately 60 days through CalOptima, for a net revenue of $1,297,405. The 60- day time estimate is based on the actual transfer dates of previous years’ VRRP IGT. The required upfront payment and subsequent disbursement from CalOptima are based on Medi-Cal managed care services provided by the City during the January 1, 2025-December 31, 2025 period. The agreements with DHCS and CalOptima are attached for reference, along with a PowerPoint presentation. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 2 - Fiscal Stability, Strategy A - Consider new revenue sources and opportunities to support the City's priority initiatives and projects. Attachment(s): 1. Agreement between the Department of Health and Human Services (DHCS) and the City of Huntington Beach. 2. Agreement between CalOptima Health and the City of Huntington Beach 3. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 2 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 Voluntary Rate Range Program Agreements with DHCS & CalOptima August 18, 2026 130 Voluntary Rate Range Program •What is the VRRP? •Revenue Benefits •Recommendation for Action 131 What is the VRRP? •Intergovernmental Transfer Program (IGT) through California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) •Allows for recovery of unreimbursed costs for providing Emergency Medical Services to CalOptima patients •City has participated in VRRP since FY 22/23 •Requires upfront cost match payment of $1,017,485 •Full amount is reimbursed back to City 132 Revenue Benefits •Helps offset for unreimbursed costs for EMS transports •Payment made to City within 60 days •Provides additional EMS revenue to general fund •NET revenue this FY is approximately $1,297,405 •Amount varies year to year based on number of transports and number of program participants 133 Recommended Action •Authorization to execute agreements and approve payment of $1,017,485 to DHCS to be send by November 20, 2026 •Alternative Action •Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly 134 Questions? 135 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-652 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Eric Parra, Chief of Police PREPARED BY:Thoby Archer, Lieutenant and Ingrid Ono, Exec. Admin. Asst. Subject: Approve and Authorize Execution of an Agreement with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Partner Law Enforcement Agencies to Participate in the Fiscal Year 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Grant Statement of Issue: Huntington Beach Police Department (HBPD) previously agreed to a one-year agreement with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department to participate in Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) for Funding Year 2024. This funding year, HBPD will continue its partnership with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD), and other regional law enforcement agencies including the Costa Mesa, Hawthorne, La Habra, Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Orange, and Seal Beach Police Departments. HBPD requests to continue to participate in Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) for Fiscal Year 2025. RCSD will remain the OPSG Grant Administrator. The grant program's period of performance is September 1, 2025, through May 31, 2028; the operational project period for participating agencies begins upon Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) approval, April 10, 2026. Financial Impact: The proposed agreement would entitle the HBPD to a total allocation of $324,500 in FY 2025 OPSG grant funds, itemized as follows: Budget Category Description Amount Total $324,500 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 2 136 File #:26-652 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Budget Category Description Amount Total $324,500 Recommended Action: Approve and authorize Police Chief Eric G. Parra to execute “Agreement for Fiscal Year 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG).” Alternative Action(s): Do not approve and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: The Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD) applied for and received grant funds from the Department of Homeland Security to serve as the OPSG Grant Administrator for the San Diego Sector for FY 2025. The funds are passed through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) in the amount of $2,700,000 and are further distributed among 11 partner law enforcement agencies in Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties to fund their participation in Operation Stonegarden (OPSG). The Huntington Beach Police Department's role in OPSG is to coordinate intelligence-based operations within the Huntington Beach area of responsibility and adjacent coastal areas, conduct high-visibility interdiction operations along I-405, and conduct harbor and coastal patrols and aerial support in response to maritime smuggling activity, in order to detect, prevent, and investigate incidents of human trafficking and the trafficking of illicit narcotics. At no time will HBPD violate SB 54 or assist in any immigration enforcement operations with federal entities. HBPD has participated in OPSG in prior grant years. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 8 - Public Safety, Strategy A - Community-wide comprehensive risk reduction program to optimize public safety's emergency response and reduce the number of calls. Attachment(s): 1. Agreement for FY 2025 Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 2 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-654 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Eric Parra, Chief of Police PREPARED BY:Brian Schrieber, Lieutenant, and Ingrid Ono, Sr. Exec. Asst. Subject: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-33 Authorizing the Acceptance of FY26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) Funding from the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to support Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Enforcement and Officer Training Statement of Issue: The Huntington Beach Police Department has been awarded $82,080 through the FY26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) Award #30846 administered by the California Highway Patrol. The funding will support DUI enforcement and officer training initiatives aimed at reducing impaired driving incidents, particularly those related to cannabis and other drug use. CHP requires a resolution specific to the current fiscal year to execute the agreement and release funds. Staff are seeking Council approval to accept the funds, adopt the resolution, and appropriate the grant amount. Financial Impact: The $82,080 grant is fully reimbursable and will be used between July 1, 2026, and June 30, 2027. There is no impact on the General Fund. Grant revenues will be appropriated into a dedicated account for tracking and reporting purposes. Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the execution of grant agreement FY26/27 CTFGP Law Enforcement- Huntington Beach Police Department and adopt Resolution No. 2026-33, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing the Chief of Police to Accept Grant Funds from the State of California Department of California Highway Patrol for DUI Saturation Patrols and Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) Training." Alternative Action(s): Do not approve and direct staff accordingly Analysis: The Huntington Beach Police Department continues to see a significant number of DUI-related City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 2 165 File #:26-654 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 8 - Public Safety, Strategy A - Community-wide comprehensive risk reduction program to optimize public safety's emergency response and reduce the number of calls. Attachment(s): 1. Grant Agreement FY26/27 CTFGP Law Enforcement-Huntington Beach, Award #30846 2. Resolution No. 2026-33 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 2 166 State of California DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL GRANT AGREEMENT - Page 1 Award Number 30846 FY26/27 CTFGP Law Enforcement - Huntington Beach Police Department 2.NAME OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY 3.ORGANIZATION/AGENCY SECTION TO ADMINISTER GRANT Huntington Beach Police Department From: 07/01/2026 To: 06/30/2027 5.PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 6.GRANT OPPORTUNITY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION Law Enforcement grants provide financial assistance to allied agencies for the education, prevention, and the enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products. The intent of the program is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve the Organization/Agency’s effectiveness through training and development of new strategies. 7.FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS GRANT AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED $82,080.00 8.TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Grantee agrees to complete the Project, as described in the Project Description. The Grantee’s Grant Application, and the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13, Sections 1890.00-1890.27, are hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement by reference. The parties hereto agree to comply with the Terms and Conditions of the following attachments: •Schedule A – Project Description, Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives, and Method of Procedure •Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate •Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative We, the officials named below, hereby swear, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above-described Grant Terms and Conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Grant Agreement is executed by the parties hereto. 9.APPROVAL SIGNATURES A. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY Name: Eric Parra Title: Chief Phone: (714) 960-8825 Address: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 E-Mail: eparra@hbpd.org (Signature) (Date) B. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF CHP Name: Elliotte Johnson Phone: (916) 843-4360 Title: Captain Fax: (916) 322-3169 Address: 601 North 7th Street Sacramento, CA 95811 E-Mail: ElJohnson@chp.ca.gov (Signature) (Date) C. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF CHP Name: M. V. Fojas Phone: (916) 843-3531 Title: Commander Fax: (916) 322-3159 Address: 601 North 7th Street Sacramento, CA 95811 E-Mail: Michelle.Fojas@chp.ca.gov (Signature) (Date) 10.AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL CONTACT TO RECEIVEREIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS Name: Perla Zuniga Title: Principle Management Analyst Phone: (714) 960-8825 Address: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 167 168 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Grantee shall comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13 Section 1890, et seq. and all other Terms and Conditions noted in this Grant Agreement. Failure by the Grantee to comply may result in the termination of this Grant Agreement by the California Highway Patrol (hereafter referred to as State). The State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated. A. EXECUTION 1. The State (the California Highway Patrol) hereby awards, to the Grantee, the sum of money stated on page one of this Grant Agreement. This funding is awarded to the Grantee to carry out the Project set forth in the Project Description and the terms and conditions set forth in this Grant Agreement. 2. The funding for this Grant Agreement is allocated pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 34019(f)(3)(B). The Grantee agrees that the State’s obligation to pay any sum under this Grant Agreement is contingent upon availability of funds disbursed from the California Cannabis Tax Fund to the State. If there is insufficient funding, the State shall have the option to either: 1) terminate this Grant Agreement; whereby, no party shall have any further obligations or liabilities under this Grant Agreement, or 2) negotiate a Grant Agreement Amendment to reduce the grant award and scope of work to be provided under this Grant Agreement. 3. The Grantee is not to commence or proceed with any work in advance of receiving notice that the Grant Agreement is approved. Any work performed by the Grantee in advance of the date of approval by the State shall be deemed volunteer work and will not be reimbursed by the State. 4. The Grantee agrees to provide any additional funding, beyond what the State has agreed to provide, pursuant to this Grant Agreement, and necessary to complete or carry out the Project, as described in this Grant Agreement. Any modification or alteration of this Grant Agreement, as set forth in the Grant Application submitted by the Grantee and on file with the State, must be submitted in writing thirty (30) calendar days in advance to the State for approval. 5. The Grantee agrees to complete the Project within the timeframe indicated in the Project Performance Period, which is on page one of this Grant Agreement. B. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 1. The Grantee shall submit all reimbursements, progress, performance, and/or other required reports concerning the status of work performed in furtherance of this Grant Agreement on a quarterly basis, or as requested by the State. 2. The Grantee shall provide the State with a final report showing all Project expenditures, which includes all State and any other Project funding expended, within sixty (60) calendar days after completion of this Grant Agreement. 3. The Grantee shall ensure all equipment which is purchased, maintained, operated, and/or developed is available for inspection by the State. 4. Equipment purchased through this Grant Agreement shall be used for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws, unless the Grantee is funding a portion of the purchased price not dedicated to impaired driving and that portion is not part of the Project costs. Equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement must only be used for approved Project- related purposes, unless otherwise approved by the State in writing. 5. Prior to disposition of equipment acquired under this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall notify the State via e-mail, and by telephone, by calling the California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit at (916) 843-4360. 169 TERMS AND CONDITIONS C. PROJECT TERMINATION 1. Grantee or the State may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time prior to the commencement of the Project. Once the Project has commenced, this Grant Agreement may only be terminated if the party withdrawing provides thirty (30) calendar days written notice of their intent to withdraw. a. If by reason of force majeure the performance hereunder is delayed or prevented, then the term end date may be extended by mutual consent for the same amount of time of such delay or prevention. The term “force majeure” shall mean any fire, flood, earthquake, or public disaster, strike, labor dispute or unrest, embargo, riot, war, insurrection or civil unrest, any act of God, any act of legally constituted authority, or any other cause beyond the Grantee’s control which would excuse the Grantee’s performance as a matter of law. b. Grantee agrees to provide written notice of an event of force majeure under this Grant Agreement within ten (10) calendar days of the commencement of such event, and within ten (10) calendar days after the termination of such event, unless the force majeure prohibits Grantee from reasonably giving notice within this period. Grantee will give such notice at the earliest possible time following the event of force majeure. 2. Any violations of law committed by the Grantee, misrepresentations of Project information by the Grantee to the State, submission of falsified documents by the Grantee to the State, or failure to provide records by the Grantee to the State when requested for audit or site visit purposes may be cause for termination. If the Project is terminated for the reasons described in this paragraph, the State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated. 3. The State may terminate this Grant Agreement and be relieved of any payments should the Grantee fail to perform the requirements of this Grant Agreement at the time and in the manner herein provided. Furthermore, the Grantee, upon termination, shall return grant funds not expended by the Grantee as of the date of termination. 4. If this Grant Agreement is terminated, the State may choose to exclude the Grantee from future Grant Opportunities. D. FINANCIAL RECORDS 1. The Grantee agrees the State, or their designated representative, shall have the right to review and to copy all records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Grant Agreement. Grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated or required by law. Grantee agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Furthermore, the Grantee agrees to include a similar right for the State to audit all records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Grant Agreement. E. HOLD HARMLESS 1. The Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State, its officials, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all Grantee’s staff, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Grant Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, agency, firm, corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Grantee in performance of this Grant Agreement. 170 TERMS AND CONDITIONS F. NONDISCRIMINATION 1. The Grantee agrees to comply with State and federal laws outlawing discrimination, including, but not limited to, those prohibiting discrimination because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religion, creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (including cancer or genetic characteristics), sexual orientation, political affiliation, position in a labor dispute, age, marital status, and denial of statutorily-required employment- related leave. (GC 12990 [a-f] and CCR, Title 2, Section 8103.) G. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 1. The Grantee assures the State it complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) H. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 1. The Grantee shall comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions: a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations. b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about: i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace. ii. The person's or Organization/Agency's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c. Every employee who works on the Project will: i. Receive a copy of the company's drug-free workplace policy statement. ii. Agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Grant Agreement. 2. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Grant Agreement, or termination of this Grant Agreement, or both, and Grantee may be ineligible for award of any future Grant Agreements if the department determines that any of the following has occurred: a. The Grantee has made false certification or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements, as noted above. (GC 8350 et seq.) I. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 1. All law enforcement Organization/Agency Grantees shall comply with California law regarding racial profiling. Specifically, law enforcement Organization/Agency Grantees shall not engage in the act of racial profiling, as defined in California Penal Code Section 13519.4. 171 TERMS AND CONDITIONS J. LABOR CODE/WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1. The Grantee is advised and made aware of the provisions which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions, and Grantee affirms to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Grant Agreement, (refer to Labor Code Section 3700). K. GRANT APPLICATION INCORPORATION 1. The Grantee agrees the Grant Application and any subsequent changes or additions approved or required by the State is hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement. L. STATE LOBBYING 1. The Grantee is advised that none of the funds provided under this Grant Agreement may be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a state or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any state or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a state official, whose salary is supported by this Grant Agreement, from engaging in direct communications with the state or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary state and/or local practice. M. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES 1. The Grantee represents and warrants that: a. It is validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, has, or will have the requisite power, authority, licenses, permits, and the like necessary to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as contemplated in this Grant Agreement, and will, at all times, lawfully conduct its business in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and rules. b. It is not a party to any Grant Agreement, written or oral, creating obligations that would prevent it from entering into this Grant Agreement or satisfying the terms herein. c. If the Grantee is a Nonprofit Organization/Agency, it will maintain its “Active” status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its “Current” status with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California tax- exempt status. If the Grantee subcontracts with a Nonprofit as part of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall ensure the Nonprofit will maintain its “Active” status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its “Current” status with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California tax-exempt status. d. All of the information in its Grant Application and all materials submitted are true and accurate. N. AIR OR WATER POLLUTION VIOLATION 1. Under the state laws, the Grantee shall not be: (1) in violation of any order or resolution not subject to review promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution control district; (2) subject to cease and desist order not subject to review issued pursuant to Section 13301 of the Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or (3) finally determined to be in violation of provisions of federal law relating to air or water pollution. 172 TERMS AND CONDITIONS O. GRANTEE NAME CHANGE 1. Grantee agrees to immediately inform the State, in writing, of any changes to the name of the person within the Organization/Agency with delegated signing authority. 2. An Amendment is required to change the Grantee's name, as listed on this Grant Agreement. Upon receipt of legal documentation of the name change, the State will process the Amendment. Payment of invoices presented with a new name cannot be paid prior to approval of said Amendment. P. RESOLUTION 1. A county, city, district, or other local public body shall provide the State with a copy of a resolution, order, motion, or ordinance of the local governing body, which by law, has authority to enter into a Grant Agreement, authorizing execution of the Grant Agreement. Q. PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM STD. 204 1. This form shall be completed by all non-governmental Grantees. R. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT AGENCY TAXPAYER ID FORM 1. This form shall be completed by all Grantees. S. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1. This section serves to make the Grantee aware of specific provisions related to current or former state employees. If Grantee has any questions regarding the status of any person rendering services or involved with the Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall contact the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) immediately for clarification. 2. Current State Employees: a. No officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity, or enterprise, from which the officer or employee receives compensation or has a financial interest, and which is sponsored or funded by any state agency, unless the employment, activity, or enterprise is required, as a condition of regular state employment. b. No officer or employee shall contract on their own behalf, as an independent Grantee, with any state agency to provide goods or services. 3. Former State Employees: a. For the two-year period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract in which they engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions, planning, arrangements, or any part of the decision-making process relevant to this Grant Agreement while employed in any capacity by any state agency. b. For the 12-month period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract with any state agency if they were employed by that state agency in a policy-making position in the same general subject area as the proposed Grant Agreement within the 12-month period prior to their leaving state service. 4. The authorized representative of the Grantee Organization/Agency, named within this Grant Agreement, warrants their Organization/Agency and its employees have no personal or financial interest and no present or past employment or activity, which would be incompatible with 173 TERMS AND CONDITIONS participating in any activity related to this Grant Agreement. For the duration of this Grant Agreement, the Organization/Agency and its employees will not accept any gift, benefit, gratuity or consideration, or begin a personal or financial interest in a party who is associated with this Grant Agreement. 5. The Grantee Organization/Agency and its employees shall not disclose any financial, statistical, personal, technical, media-related, and/or other information or data derived from this Grant Agreement, made available for use by the State, for the purposes of providing services to the State, in conjunction with this Grant Agreement, except as otherwise required by law or explicitly permitted by the State in writing. The Grantee shall immediately advise the State of any person(s) who has access to confidential Project information and intends to disclose that information in violation of this Grant Agreement. 6. The Grantee will not enter into any Grant Agreement or discussions with third parties concerning materials described in paragraph five (5) prior to receiving written confirmation from the State that such third party has a Grant Agreement with the State, similar in nature to this one. 7. The Grantee warrants that only those employees who are authorized and required to use the materials described in paragraph 5 will have access to them. 8. If the Grantee violates any provisions in the above paragraphs, such action by the Grantee shall render this Grant Agreement void. T. EQUIPMENT-USE TERMS 1. The Grantee agrees any equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement shall be used for impaired driving efforts. 2. Law Enforcement Projects: a. Oral Fluid Drug Screening Devices and Cannabis/Marijuana Breath Testing Equipment - The Grantee agrees to ensure all personnel using road-side drug testing equipment, including oral fluid drug testing devices and/or cannabis/marijuana breath testing devices, purchased with grant funds from this Grant Agreement, are trained to recognize alcohol and drug impairment. At a minimum, personnel using these devices should receive Standardized Field Sobriety Testing training. These personnel are also encouraged to attend Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement and Drug Recognition Evaluator training. Prior to using these devices, the Grantee agrees to obtain permission from their local prosecutor’s office, establish a policy ensuring appropriate use, and require the staff using these devices to receive appropriate training, which may include training from the manufacturer. This will help ensure the equipment is used appropriately. The Grantee shall advise the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) of any legal challenges or other items of significance that may affect the use or legal acceptance of these devices. Additionally, the State may request additional information about the performance of these devices, including information about their use, accuracy, and feedback from personnel using the devices. b. Law Enforcement Vehicles – The Grantee agrees any law enforcement vehicles purchased with Grant funds, from this Grant Agreement, will be primarily used for the enforcement of driving under the influence laws and/or providing public education, related to the dangers of driving under the influence. Additionally, any vehicle purchased using funds from this Grant Agreement shall comply with all California Vehicle Code and California Code of Regulation requirements. The State may require the Grantee to mark these vehicles with a decal and/or emblem, indicating the vehicle is used for driving under the influence enforcement. 174 Schedule A Huntington Beach Police Department The Grantor determined awards and adjustments based on the Project’s merit, operational scale, compliance with the Request for Application (RFA), and program regulations. Certain activities or budget items proposed in Schedule A may have been deemed ineligible for funding. The final, binding list of authorized activities and expenses is set forth in Schedule B - Detailed Budget Estimate. Project Description Funding the proposed project aims to reduce the incidence of DUI-related collisions and arrests in the community by focusing on two key areas: training and enforcement. To achieve the desired outcomes, the project will utilize funding to host SFST (Standardized Field Sobriety Test) with certified HBPD instructors; and to also train officers who require SFST training. In both cases, the training will be during officers/instructors' days off and will require overtime through grant funding. In addition to training, the project will also use funding to conduct DUI saturation patrols in the community. These patrols will be carried out by officers who have received the necessary DUI-related training. The patrols will be conducted at high-risk times and in high-risk areas where DUI offenses are more likely to occur. By increasing the presence of law enforcement in these areas, the project aims to deter DUI offenders and reduce the incidence of DUI-related accidents and arrests. Overall, the proposed project will use a multifaceted approach to address the issue of DUI-related incidents in the community. By combining training and enforcement activities, the project aims to reduce the number of DUI-related incidents and make the community safer for all residents. Problem Statement The problem/need that the proposed project aims to address the high number DUI incidents and DUI repeat offenders in the local community, particularly related to cannabis use and/or other disorienting drugs. The department currently staffs two full-time DUI officers through the California Office of Traffic Safety, both of whom are proactive and are enthusiastic about DUI enforcement and are SFST, DRE, and ARIDE certified; however, because of the recent increase in DUI incidents, the HBPD needs additional resources to combat the problem effectively. The proposed solution to address this problem is twofold. First, the project aims to secure funding for additional DUI saturation patrols in the community. With increased funding, the department will be able to conduct more frequent and effective DUI saturation patrols at high-risk times and in high-risk areas where DUI offenses are more likely to occur. The increased presence of law enforcement in these areas will deter DUI offenders and reduce the incidence of DUI-related accidents and arrests. At present, the HBPD conducts an average of 1-2 DUI saturation patrols a week through OTS funding. With the additional funding, we will be able to provide additional DUI saturation patrols in the hopes of curbing the increase in DUI offenders in our city. Secondly, the project seeks to provide additional training opportunities for officers, including hosting in-house SFST training and sending more officers to external DUI-related training programs. Currently, the department has twenty position vacancies that will be filled by officers who may not have received DUI-related training. By providing training opportunities to these officers, the project aims to enhance officers' ability to identify and apprehend DUI offenders and reduce the incidence of DUI-related accidents and arrests. Recent statistical data supports the problem/need identified by the project. According to recent data, Huntington Beach has seen a large number of DUI incidents, particularly related to cannabis use and/or other disorienting drugs. This trend poses a significant threat to public safety and underscores the urgent need for additional resources to combat the problem effectively. Form 2023-2025, Huntington Beach has averaged the following number of DUI (drug/alcohol-drug combo) collisions: • Drug Involved Fatal Collisions: 2 • Drug Involved Injury Collisions: 19 • Drug Involved Injuries: 29 • Alcohol/Drug Injury Collisions: 12 • Alcohol/Drug Injury Victims: 18 175 Schedule B Performance Measures/Scope of Work (Proposed Solution) The following goals are aimed at reducing the impact of alcohol and drug-involved crashes in the City of Huntington Beach and improving overall public safety. The percentages are based on reasonable expectations and achievable targets. 1. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes by 10% (Quarterly): A 10%reduction in fatalities resulting from alcohol-involved crashes will demonstrate the effectiveness of implemented strategies and showcase a safer environment for the community. 2. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes by 10% (Quarterly): A 10% reduction in injuries will emphasize the project's success in promoting responsible driving and reducing alcohol-related collisions. 3. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes by 10% (Quarterly): A 10% decrease in drug-related crash fatalities will illustrate the impact of the project's efforts in combating drug-impaired driving. 4. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes by 10% (Quarterly): By reducing drug- related crash injuries by 10%, the project showcases its effectiveness in promoting a safer driving environment. 5. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes by 15% (Quarterly): A 30% reduction in fatalities resulting from combined alcohol and drug use demonstrates the project's comprehensive approach to addressing impaired driving. 6. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes by 15% (Quarterly): A 20% reduction in injuries from alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes highlights the project's dedication to tackling the most severe cases of impaired driving. 7. Host (2) SFST 2-day in-house training courses (Annually): Each course will require (2) instructors and will have (2) officer attendees. By hosting these courses, the project aims to increase the number of officers proficient in identifying and dealing with impaired drivers, enhancing overall law enforcement effectiveness. 8. Conduct (28) DUI Saturation Patrol Operations (Annually) consisting of (2) officers each working (10) hours per operation: Increasing the frequency and visibility of DUI saturation patrols will deter potential offenders and lead to a decrease in alcohol and drug-involved crashes. Project Performance Evaluation Quantitative Data Analysis: Compare previous year (2025) data on all DUI related collisions (fatal, injury, property damage only) after the implementation of the department's strategies to track the progress. Track the number of DUI arrests and their locations to identify areas where targeted enforcement is needed and adjust targeting efforts accordingly. Track the number of personnel trained through in-house SFST training and ensure goals are met. Qualitative Data Collection: Interview police officers and personnel assigned to the traffic bureau and/or working DUI Saturation Patrols to gather insights into the challenges they face and the impact of the department's efforts on their work. Communication Plan: Generate a report summarizing the findings from the quantitative and qualitative data analysis and share it with internal and external stakeholders. Use social media platforms to share the report and communicate the positive impact of the department's efforts on DUI enforcement and its impact on traffic safety. 176 Schedule B Program Sustainability The plan to reduce reliance on future grant funding involves the following steps: Increasing community involvement: Building stronger relationships with the community can help to increase public support and funding for the agency's future DUI enforcement and training efforts. This could involve hosting public events, speaking to community groups, and working with local businesses to promote the agency's mission. Improving efficiency and effectiveness: By streamlining operations and improving the effectiveness of the agency's programs, the agency can demonstrate its value to potential funding sources and increase its ability to secure additional funding. This involves conducting regular program evaluations, identifying areas for improvement, and seeking out training and development opportunities for agency staff. Building a contingency plan: In the event that grant funding is reduced or not available, the agency should have a contingency plan in place to continue its efforts. This could involve scaling back programs, finding alternative sources of funding, and prioritizing the agency's most important initiatives. Timeframe: These efforts to reduce reliance on grant funding should be ongoing, with a focus on consistently seeking out alternative funding sources and building relationships with the community. Summary: The plan to reduce reliance on future grant funding for the Law Enforcement grants program involves increasing community involvement, improving efficiency and effectiveness, and building a contingency plan. These efforts should be ongoing, and a contingency plan should be in place in the event of a reduction in grant funding. Administrative Support The Huntington Beach Police Department (HBPD) has been working diligently to secure grant funding from various sources to enhance their capabilities and better serve their community. Over the past several years, the department has received grants from the California Office of Traffic Safety, which have been instrumental in improving their traffic enforcement efforts. Through these grants, the department has been able to increase their focus on DUI prevention, implement sobriety checkpoints and provide education and awareness campaigns to the public. In addition to the OTS grants, the department has also been awarded the Operation Stone Garden grant through FEMA for the past several years. This grant has allowed them to collaborate with other local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to enhance their border security efforts. The department is proud to report that they have been in full compliance with their grants and have maintained a good standing with the respective awarding agencies. To continue their efforts to improve their community's safety, the HBPD is seeking grant funding to continue hosting Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) training in-house that is open to all California law enforcement. This training is essential to help officers improve their skills in detecting and investigating impaired driving cases. The department has three officers who are certified SFST instructors, and/or a lieutenant who is a certified Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) instructor. By utilizing the expertise of these personnel, the department plans to host the SFST training at their facility, which will reduce costs and provide a more efficient way for their officers, and other agency officers, to receive training. While the department has received funding through the OTS grants, they are currently limited in the amount of enforcement they can do due to OTS funding constraints. With additional funds, we plan to increase the frequency and intensity of DUI saturation patrols, which will undoubtedly help prevent alcohol and/or drug DUI-related collisions in their city. The department remains committed to working with their community to ensure public safety and will continue to seek out and utilize all available resources to enhance their efforts. 177 Schedule B Grant Total $82,080.00 Detailed Budget Estimate 30846 Huntington Beach Police Department $82,080.00 Cost Category Line Item Name Total Cost to Grant DUI Saturation Patrols $61,600.00 SFST Training - Attend $7,040.00 SFST Training - Instruct $7,920.00 Phlebotomist $5,520.00 178 Schedule B-1 Budget Narrative Huntington Beach Police Department Prior to engaging in grant-funded Saturation Patrols, DUI Checkpoints, or other enforcement activities in areas where the grantee does not have primary traffic jurisdiction, the grantee should consult with the agency having primary traffic jurisdiction. Personnel DUI Saturation Patrols $61,600.00 2 officers X $110 (OT rate/hour) X 10 hours = $2,200.00 (per Operation) $2,200.00 X 28 Operations = $61,600.00 SFST Training - Attend $7,040.00 4 Officers x $110.00 (OT rate) x 8 hours= ($880) x 2 days = ($1760) X 4 Officers = $7,040 SFST Training - Instruct $7,920.00 2 Instructor Officers x $110.00 (OT rate) x 16 Hours ($1760) +2 Hours (PREP) ($220) = $1,980 X 2 Officers = $3,960 (total for one training) X2 Classes = $7,920 Consultants/Contracts Phlebotomist $5,520.00 Funding for a Phlebotomist to conduct blood draws on all CHP Grant DUI related arrests during grant funded DUI Saturation Operations. $125 per blood draw. 179 180 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-648 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Chau Vu, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY:Chris Davis, Senior Management Analyst Subject: Amend Fiscal Year 2026/27 West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) Budget by $4,600,000 to Return Unexpended Cathodic Protection Program Funds to Member Agencies’ Water Enterprise Funds Based on Ownership Percentage Statement of Issue: WOCWB currently holds a fund balance of $7.6 million. This balance is the result of pre-financing for the Cathodic Protection Program. However, now that the Cathodic Protection Program is no longer necessary, these funds are no longer intended for a specific project, and the Board could return them to member agency’s enterprise funds. Financial Impact: Approval of the budget amendment would reduce the WOCWB fund balance to approximately $2,000,000. Funds in the amount of $2,580,600 would be added to the City’s Water Master Plan Fund (507) undesignated unreserved fund balance. Recommended Action: Approve budget amendment and return funds to member agency’s water enterprise funds. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve budget amendment and maintain current fund balance with WOCWB and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: The City is a member of the West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) Joint Powers Authority. The individual member agencies of WOCWB need to approve the proposed WOCWB budget amendment prior to ratification by the Board as a whole. The Board currently holds a fund balance of $7.6 million as of June 30, 2026. This high balance is the result of pre-financing for the Cathodic Protection Program. However, the Cathodic Protection City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 3 181 File #:26-648 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 3 182 File #:26-648 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Total 100%$4,600,000 . Funds would be returned to each member agency after the CAMP term ends in November 2026. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 3 of 3 183 Funds Transfer from West Orange County Water Board to Huntington Beach City Council August 18, 2026 184 WOCWB Overview Over the last 70 years, the West Orange County Water Board has supported water transportation for member agencies via a Joint Powers Agreement •West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) is a Joint Powers Agency originally established in 1955 with the mission of transporting water to its member agencies via two large-capacity pipelines Member agency cities are Huntington Beach, Seal Beach, Westminster, and Garden Grove as of the revised Joint Power Agreement drafted in 1967 Water is delivered from the Municipal Water District of Orange County through the OC-9 and OC-35 connections at Katella Avenue and Dale Street in Stanton WOCWB has no employees but contracts several functions on a time/materials basis WOCWB General Manager formulates budget to conduct administrative affairs and issue purchase/work orders •Ownership/capacity rights across member agencies as follows: 56.1% for Huntington Beach, 25.4% for Westminster, 14.3% for Seal Beach, and 4.2% for Garden Grove (WOCWB Board has five seats with Huntington Beach having two seats and other member agencies having one seat each) 185 Current Situation WOCWB has the opportunity to revert over $4 million back to its member agencies’ Enterprise Funds (specifically Water Fund) due to prior payments that are no longer necessary for capital improvements•In 2020, Engineering staff presented a $8 million proposal to the WOCWB Board implementing a Cathodic Protection Program on the transmission mains to extend their 60+ year lifespans rather than replace them Board approved plan to contribute $1 million per year beginning in Fiscal Year 2020/21 (prorated by each agency’s ownership percentage of the Board) and a total of $6 million was collected In Fiscal Year 2023/24, the Board’s engineering consultant began a study and determined that Cathodic Protection was not feasible for OC-9 or OC-35 due to segments being too narrow A subsequent engineering feasibility study in 2024-2025 listed repairs totaling $620,000 to areas of high concern and the Board repurposed $1 million to cover these repairs and contingencies •These collections have left WOCWB with an approximately $7.6 million fund balance versus a conservative estimate of $2 million required to cover necessary future capital expenditures – we are proposing to revert $4.6 million to member agencies and leave approximately $3 million in WOCWB 186 Recommendation Approve and authorize the WOCWB Board members for Huntington Beach to vote in favor of the return of $4.6 million in excess funds to the member agencies at the October 21, 2026 WOCWB meeting 187 Questions? 188 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-645 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Chau Vu, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY:Kristen Schroeder, Water Quality Supervisor Subject: Approve Response Letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report , “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water ,” and Forward to the Presiding Judge Statement of Issue: Transmitted for City Council consideration is a response letter to the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report entitled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water,” and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached transmittal letter to the Honorable Sheila F. Hanson, Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court. Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 933.05, the City must respond to the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations within 90 days of publication, no later than September 7, 2026. Financial Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Recommended Action: A) Approve the City's response letter containing the findings and recommendations in response to the Orange County Grand Jury Report entitled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water”; and B) Authorize the Mayor to submit the response letter to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court. Alternative Action(s): Amend the response letter prior to submitting it to the Presiding Judge. Pursuant to state law, the City must submit a response within 90 days, no later than September 7, 2026. Analysis: City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 3 189 File #:26-645 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water.” The report focuses on the presence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in local water supplies and evaluates the actions taken by water agencies in Orange County to monitor, treat, and communicate information related to PFAS. As required by California Penal Code Section 933.05, the City of Huntington Beach is obligated to provide formal responses to the applicable findings and recommendations identified in the report. The Grand Jury’s examination provides a detailed account of PFAS detections across Orange County water systems, recent regulatory requirements, and the status of PFAS treatment facility planning and implementation. It also evaluates the effectiveness of public education and outreach efforts. The findings underscore the importance of coordinated regional efforts to ensure safe drinking water and transparent communication with the public. The City of Huntington Beach recognizes the significance of the Grand Jury’s work and supports its efforts to enhance public understanding of PFAS and water quality issues. Water resource management is a technically complex field, requiring constant investment, regulatory compliance, and public trust. The report affirms that Orange County agencies have established one of the most comprehensive PFAS testing, treatment, and communication programs in the state. The Orange County Water District (OCWD), working collaboratively with its member agencies, has taken a proactive leadership role by investing more than $600 million in PFAS removal infrastructure and related groundwater protection measures. As both a groundwater producer and an OCWD member agency, the City benefits directly from these regional initiatives. OCWD’s Groundwater Replenishment System continues to play a critical role in long-term water supply reliability, producing approximately 130,000 acre-feet of purified water annually representing roughly one-third of the water demand within its service area. These efforts significantly bolster the reliability and sustainability of Huntington Beach’s water supply. In general, the City concurs with the Grand Jury’s findings and recommendations. Over many years, the City and OCWD have implemented extensive PFAS monitoring, testing, and treatment efforts to ensure that drinking water delivered to residents and businesses meets all state and federal safety standards. The City also maintains accessible PFAS information on its website and includes PFAS advisories and compliance details in the annual Consumer Confidence Report. Overall, the Grand Jury’s report reinforces the strength of local and regional initiatives addressing PFAS contamination and highlights the continued need for transparent public communication. The City’s proposed responses, prepared by Utilities Division staff with support from OCWD, reflect the City’s ongoing commitment to water quality protection and regulatory compliance. These responses are provided in Attachment 2 along with a transmittal letter for the Mayor’s signature. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 3 190 File #:26-645 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury Report 2. Draft Transmittal Letter 3. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 3 of 3 191 Orange County Grand Jury Report “PFAS and Public Awareness, A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” 192 Fcalifornia stateting,4 PFAS and Public Awareness A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 193 194 This page intentionally left blank 195 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 3 of 62 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 5 REASON FOR STUDY ................................................................................................... 8 METHOD OF STUDY ...................................................................................................... 8 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 9 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 35 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 36 COMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 37 REQUIRED RESPONSES ............................................................................................ 39 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 46 Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 50 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 51 Appendix A .................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix B .................................................................................................................... 62 FIGURES Figure 1 - Potential Major Exposure Pathways of PFAS to Humans ............................... 6 Figure 2 - Orange County Groundwater Public Supply Wells ........................................ 11 Figure 3 - Orange County Water District (OCWD) Service Area ................................... 12 Figure 4 - Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) Service Area ............ 13 Figure 5 - The PFAS Cycle ............................................................................................ 15 Figure 6 - Wastewater Treatment Discharges to the Santa Ana River .......................... 16 Figure 7 - CDC Multi-site Study Site Orange County, CA .............................................. 17 Figure 8 - Average PFAS Levels in Blood, CDC Multi-site Study Virtual Open House, July 2025 ....................................................................................................... 18 Figure 9 - How are people exposed to PFAS? .............................................................. 20 Figure 10 - Are PFAS Safe? .......................................................................................... 22 Figure 11 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources During UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 Monitoring Cycles ......................................................................... 24 196 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 4 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Figure 12 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources Listed on Each SWRCB Monitoring Order Exhibit A ............................................................ 25 Figure 13 - PFAS Rule Enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals ............................................................................ 27 Figure 14 - Timeline of OCWD Response to PFAS in the Santa Ana River Basin ......... 29 Figure 15 - Map of Current and Future PFAS Treatment Locations .............................. 30 Figure 16 - Approximate PFAS Capital Funding Sources .............................................. 31 Figure 17 - Summary of PFAS Treatment Facilities ...................................................... 32 Figure 18 - OCWD Share of PFAS Treatment Facility Annual O&M Cost ..................... 33 Figure 19 - PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area Residents .............................. 34 Figure 20 - UCMR 3 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants ...................................... 55 Figure 21 - UCMR 5 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants ...................................... 56 Figure 22 - SWRCB PFAS General Monitoring Orders Issued 2020 through 2025 ....... 57 Figure 23 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2020-0003-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 58 Figure 24 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2021-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 59 Figure 25 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2022-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 60 Figure 26 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2025-0002-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 61 Figure 27 - EPA Eight Content Requirements of a Consumer Confidence Report ........ 62 197 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 5 of 62 SUMMARY Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) form a broad class of thousands of synthetic chemicals characterized by strong carbon–fluorine bonds and are among the most durable compounds in organic chemistry. This bond strength makes PFAS highly resistant to breaking down, allowing them to persist in the environment for decades or longer. Because of this persistence, PFAS are often called “forever chemicals.” Various industries have used PFAS in consumer and commercial applications since the 1940s because their chemical properties provide water, oil, and stain resistance, as well as heat stability. These properties support applications across numerous sectors, including aerospace, automotive, textiles, firefighting foams, food packaging, electronics, and medical devices. As a result of their widespread use and persistence, PFAS now appear globally in water, air, soil, wildlife, and human blood . Scientific studies continue to show associations between PFAS exposure and harmful health effects in humans and animals, although the degree of risk varies by compound. In response, federal and state agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), began accelerating regulatory actions in the 2010s to reduce PFAS exposure, enhance monitoring, and develop treatment and disposal methods. This report identifies and describes PFAS levels detected by Orange County drinking water agencies. It evaluates how these agencies have responded to recent PFAS regulatory requirements. It also examines the progress of PFAS treatment facility planning and installation, along with implementation of public education programs related to PFAS in drinking water. This report’s findings and recommendations aim to strengthen PFAS reporting in annual Water Quality Reports (Consumer Confidence Reports) and expand public outreach by Orange County drinking water agencies. BACKGROUND PFAS are a large group of man-made "forever chemicals" produced since the 1940s, known for extreme persistence, environmental mobility, and bioaccumulation due to strong carbon-fluorine bonds.1 Used in water/stain-resistant coatings, firefighting foams, industrial processes, PFAS have contaminated soil, water, and air globally. 1 Elsie M. Sunderland, et al., “A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects,” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, November 23, 2018, accessed March 16, 2026, https://sunderlandlab.org/assets/sunderland_jeseerev_2018wsi.pdf . 198 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 6 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Contaminated drinking water has led to high levels of exposure to PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS2 for some populations residing near manufacturing facilities. Workers in facilities that make or use PFAS can be exposed to higher amounts of these chemicals and have higher levels in their blood.3 Infants may be exposed to PFAS through breastfeeding.4 Figure 1 - Potential Major Exposure Pathways of PFAS to Humans5 PFAS, especially PFOA and PFOS, have been detected in air, water, and soil in and around manufacturing facilities. However, these releases have been declining since companies began phasing out the production and use of several PFAS in the early 2000s.6 Due to their chemical structure, PFAS are very stable in the environment and are resistant to breaking down. Some PFAS are volatile and can be carried long distances through the air, which may lead to contamination of soils and groundwater far from the source of the PFAS emission.7 The four major sources of PFAS are: fire training/fire response sites, industrial sites, landfills, and wastewater treatment plants/biosolids. PFAS can get into drinking water when products containing them are used or spilled onto the ground or into lakes and rivers. Once in groundwater, PFAS are easily transported long distances and can 2 Kyle Steenland, Tony Fletcher, and David A. Savitz, “Epidemiologic Evidence on the Health Effects of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA),” National Library of Medicine, accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920088/. 3 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure.” 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid. 7 “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) PFAS General," California State Water Resources Control Board, March 4, 2019, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/pfas_general_faq.pdf. 199 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 7 of 62 contaminate drinking wells. PFAS in the air can also end up in rivers and lakes used for drinking water.8 PFAS have been used extensively in surface coating and protectant formulations due to their unique ability to repel oil, grease, and water. Major applications have included protectants for paper and cardboard packaging products, carpets, leather products, and textiles that enhance water, grease, and soil repellency, and in firefighting foams. PFAS have also been used as processing aids in the manufacture of nonstick coatings on cookware. Common consumer products containing PFAS include Teflon, Gore-Tex and Scotchgard.9 Background Summary of PFAS and Its Effects Source and Exposure: Primary sources include industrial sites, firefighting training, landfills, and wastewater treatment plants. They enter drinking water, food, and indoor dust, resulting in widespread human exposure. Health and Environmental Impact: PFAS are associated with adverse effects, including cancer (i.e. testicular, kidney), developmental delays, liver damage, and high cholesterol. They do not break down easily, leading to "background" contamination even in remote areas.10 Regulation and Action: While major US manufacturing of certain PFAS ended around 2015, they remain in products and in the environment. The EPA has established Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water.11 "Forever Chemicals" Definition: Their chemical structure, featuring one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry, makes them resistant to heat, water, and oil, thus earning them the nickname "forever chemicals.”12 In Orange County, PFAS have been detected in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, which provides 77% to 85% of the drinking water for north and central parts of the county. Local agencies have taken a proactive stance, shutting down dozens of impacted wells and building some of the nation's largest treatment facilities to ensure tap water meets safety standards.13 8 “PFAS background,” California State Water Resources Control Board , January 14, 2025, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/background.html 9 Ibid. 10 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, accessed March 11, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained. 11 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation,” Accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 12 Ibid. 13 University of California, Irvine, “UCI PFAS Health Study, Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed May 12, 2026, https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/frequently-asked-questions/. 200 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 8 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 REASON FOR STUDY Recent regulatory actions related to PFAS have created significant operational, financial, and communication challenges for drinking water agencies across California. Orange County agencies face an intensifying timeline due to the region’s reliance on groundwater supplies, the presence of PFAS in local aquifers, and the need to comply with evolving state and federal standards. As regulatory and monitoring requirements expand, agencies must rapidly adapt their treatment strategies, capital planning, and public outreach efforts. This study is necessary to provide a clear, up‑to‑date understanding of how Orange County drinking water agencies are responding to these new requirements. Evaluating the status of PFAS treatment planning and installation helps illustrate the extent of infrastructure readiness, the pace of implementation, and the challenges agencies encounter as they work to bring new systems online. At the same time, assessing the development and delivery of PFAS‑related education programs offers insight into how effectively agencies are communicating risks, regulatory changes, and water quality information to the public. By documenting current conditions and identifying gaps or emerging needs, the study supports informed decision‑making among water providers, policymakers, and ratepayers. This work helps ensure that Orange County communities receive safe drinking water and that agencies are equipped to meet regulatory expectations while maintaining public trust. METHOD OF STUDY The Orange County Grand Jury investigated the PFAS in Orange County drinking water to provide a clear and accurate assessment. The Grand Jury based its study on a comprehensive review of multiple sources, including interviews, public records, field investigations, and relevant news articles. Multiple independent sources corroborated and validated all facts, findings, and recommendations presented in the report. • Interviewed several Orange County governmental leaders and senior staff directly involved in managing drinking water quality • Reviewed and analyzed key documents related to the investigation, including: o Published Water Quality reports from all Orange County water retailers o Records from all Orange County water agencies • Examined news articles and publications relevant to the topic. • Conducted extensive internet research. 201 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 9 of 62 • Performed field investigations in which Grand Jury members visited several water management agencies to directly observe and assess drinking water processes. INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS The 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury investigated the presence of PFAS in Orange County drinking water and the response of Orange County community water systems. Community water systems (CWS) are city, county, regulated utilities, regional water systems and even small water companies and districts where people live. Non- community water system.14 Provide drinking water to the public at locations where people do not reside permanently. The investigation included evaluation of Orange County CWS compliance with federal and state PFAS monitoring and reporting requirements and the extent of the voluntary response to PFAS contamination. The Grand Jury also evaluated annual Consumer Confidence Reports, also called Annual Water Quality Reports, which are issued annually by CWS and distributed to their customers. Orange County Drinking Water Systems The Grand Jury investigation was limited to community water systems (CWS) operated by cities or special districts that are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act .15 CWS are defined as public water systems that serve at least 15 service connections used by yearlong residents, or regularly serve at least 25 yearlong residents of the area served by the system.16 In Orange County, there are 31 such CWS that are operated by cities or special districts and that sell drinking water directly to customers on a retail basis. In this report, these Orange County CWS may be referred to as retail water districts or water retailers. Drinking Water Sources North and Central Orange County Orange County is divided into two distinct areas when it comes to drinking water sources. There are 2.5 million residents of north and central Orange County, who receive about 85% of their drinking water supplies from the Orange County Groundwater Basin, and the remaining 15% of their water supplies are imported from 14 “California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 116275,” FindLaw, accessed May 21,2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/health-and-safety-code/hsc-sect-116275/. 15 “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” EPA, describing statutory authority at 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., accessed My 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act. 16 “California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 116275,” FindLaw. 202 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 10 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 the State Water Project and Colorado River delivered by Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC).17 South Orange County Approximately 600,000 residents of south Orange County rely primarily on imported water supplies delivered by MWDOC, and a few south County communities also have groundwater supplies from the San Juan Basin and surface water supplies from Irvine Lake (also referred to as the Santiago Reservoir).18 Public Supply Wells According to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as of November 2024,19 there were a total of 217 public supply wells for drinking water in Orange County. Of the 217 total wells, 211 were CWS wells and six were non-community water system wells. See Figure 2 for a Department of Water Resources map of Orange County groundwater public supply wells. This map illustrates the reliance of north and central Orange County on groundwater sources, and the reliance of south Orange County on imported water supplies. 17 “How water works in Orange County,” OCWD, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/learning- center/how-water-works-in-oc/. 18 Ibid. 19 “California’s Groundwater Live: Well Infrastructure,” California Department of Water Resources, accessed April 13, 2026, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/f2b252d15a0d4e49887ba94ac17cc4bb. 203 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 11 of 62 Source: State of California, Department of Water Resources Figure 2 - Orange County Groundwater Public Supply Wells Orange County Water District Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages the Orange County Groundwater Basin to ensure sustainable use through replenishment of groundwater and delivery of water supplies to its 19 member agencies. Some OCWD member agencies are also members of MWDOC. 204 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 12 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Figure 3 - Orange County Water District (OCWD) Service Area Municipal Water District of Orange County MWDOC is the wholesale water provider and resource planning agency that partners with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to deliver imported water to its 27 member agencies.20 Some MWDOC member agencies are also members of OCWD. 20 “How water works in Orange County,” OCWD. 205 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 13 of 62 Source: MWDOC Figure 4 - Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) Service Area PFAS and the Health Effects of Exposure What are PFAS? PFAS are a large group of many thousands of manufactured chemicals that are resistant to heat, oil, and water. Among the many thousands of different PFAS, some have been more widely used and studied than others.21 PFAS have been used extensively in surface coating and protectant formulations due to their unique ability to reduce the surface tension of liquids, and their ability to repel oil, grease, water, and staining. Major applications have included use as processing aids in the manufacture of nonstick coatings on cookware, surface protectants for paper and cardboard such as disposable food packaging, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes, and candy wrappers. Other surface protectants include those used on furniture and carpets, 21 “PFAS Explained,” EPA. 206 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 14 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 leather products, outdoor gear, and textiles.22 PFAS are also one of the main components of aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) used frequently at airports and military bases for firefighting and emergency response training activities.23 It is important to note that PFAS-containing firefighting foams and other emergency response materials containing PFAS are no longer in use at Orange County airports and harbors.24 PFOA and PFOS are two types of PFAS of particular concern that are no longer manufactured or imported into the US. Trace amounts of PFOA and PFOS may still be contained in some imported goods and in other PFAS goods and materials that are still produced and used in the US.25 Under the PFOA Stewardship Program with the EPA, eight major PFAS producers have phased out PFOA and other PFAS substances from their emissions and products; however, manufacturers are replacing substances in the PFAS family with others such as GenX and ADONA.26 Understanding the PFAS Cycle: How PFAS Moves Through the Environment PFAS move through the environment in a repeating cycle through air, water, soil, products, animals, and humans. This is known as the PFAS cycle . This cycle can be described in four stages and is illustrated at Figure 5.27 Manufacturing and use. The PFAS cycle begins during manufacturing or everyday use of PFAS-containing consumer and industrial products. During manufacture and use, PFAS are released into the air, water, and soil. As more PFAS are manufactured and used, the more they accumulate because they are persistent and resistant to degradation. Environmental spread. After PFAS are released to the environment, they move through wind, snowfall, rain, and runoff to soil and surface water, and infiltration to groundwater. Industrial sites and wastewater treatment plants are key entry points 22 “Our Current Understanding of the Human Health and Environmental Risks of PFAS,” EPA, Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/pfas/our-current-understanding-human-health-and-environmental- risks-pfas. 23 Sunderland. “A review of the pathways of human exposure.” 24 “SB-1044 Compliance: Phasing Out PFAS in Class B Firefighting Foam,” CAL FIRE, accessed April 17, 2026, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/pipeline-safety-and-cupa/fire-fighting-equipment-and-foam- pfas. 25 “PFAS – Frequently Asked Questions,” California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality (SWRCB), 5, [3] 3M Company, “Fluorochemical use, distribution and release overview.,” AR226-0550, 1999, updated March 19, 2020, accessed March 25, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . 26 “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA,” EPA, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-and- polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 27 “Understanding the PFAS Cycle,” EcoPulse, accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.ecopulsenow.com/insights/understanding-the-pfas-cycle. 207 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 15 of 62 into the environment. PFAS are absorbed from the environment by plants and animals, and then move up the food chain. Human exposure. Most people are exposed to PFAS through using PFAS - contaminated products, drinking contaminated water, and eating contaminated food such as fish caught from water contaminated by PFAS, and dairy products from livestock exposed to PFAS.28 The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) estimated that in NHANES 2017–2018 data 98% of the US population had combined PFAS serum levels greater than 2 nanograms per milliliter.29 Re-entry. Even after disposal of PFAS products, PFAS can re -enter the environment through landfill leachate or runoff to soils, agricultural spreading of biosolids, and municipal wastewater treatment effluent discharges to surface water, resulting in PFAS cycling back into soil, animal feed crops, and water. Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Figure 5 - The PFAS Cycle What is the Source of PFAS in Orange County Groundwater? Wastewater treatment plants located along the Santa Ana River that discharge effluent to the Santa Ana River upstream of managed aquifer recharge operations are sources 28 “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA,” EPA. 29 “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 2017-18 Overview,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), accessed April 16, 2026, https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017. 208 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 16 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 of PFAS contamination for public water systems downstream of these wastewater treatment plants.30 The OCWD Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) actively manages and recharges the Orange County groundwater basin with surface water from the Santa Ana River, imported surface water, and purified recycled water from the GWRS. For much of the year, flow in the Santa Ana River consists predominantly of effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants upstream from the Orange County groundwater basin.31 Figure 6 illustrates these upstream wastewater discharges to the Santa Ana River.32 PFAS has recently been measured in the Santa Ana River at concentrations consistent with wells surrounding the recharge facilities, suggesting that historic concentrations of PFAS in the Santa Ana River may be a primary input of PFAS in the Orange County groundwater basin.33 Figure 6 - Wastewater Treatment Discharges to the Santa Ana River How Much PFAS is Found in the General Population? Because of their widespread use and their persistence in the environment, many PFAS are found in the blood of people and animals all over the world.34 CDC scientists have measured PFAS in the blood serum (the clear portion of blood) of 98% of participants 30 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), What are PFAS?” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/pfas/. 31 “UCI PFAS Health Study,” University of California, Irvine, accessed May 12, 2026, https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/. 32 National Water Research Institute, Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel: Orange County Water District’s Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Study, Fountain Valley, CA, 2004, accessed April 14, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/wp-content/uploads/sarwqh-final-nwri-panel-report-2004.pdf. 33 Russ Detwiler, Reconstructing historical PFAS concentrations in groundwater using a reduced -order modeling framework. Alburquerque NM, InterPore2025, May 20, 2025, accessed April 16, 2026, https://events.interpore.org/event/56/contributions/7590/. 34 “PFAS Explained,” EPA. 209 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 17 of 62 aged 12 years and older since 1999, indicating widespread exposure to PFAS in the US population.35 Researchers at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) are participating in the CDC Multi-site Study (MSS).36 The MSS provides information to communities about the health effects of exposure to PFAS. The UCI MSS site is the area in Orange County, shown at On the chart, the Orange County study site is labeled “CA.” Orange County is the only California location included in the study. Figure 7. At the July 2025 MSS update, the UCI researchers shared results showing average levels of certain PFAS chemicals in the blood of adults who participated at the Orange County study site. They compared Orange County results with other study locations and with national averages. For adults at the Orange County site, the average blood levels were estimated to be 2.4 for PFOS, 1.2 for PFOA, 1.3 for PFHxS, and 0.27 for PFNA (measured in nanograms per milliliter, ng/L) These levels were lower than the averages seen across all study sites. In addition, all of these levels, except PFHxS, were lower than the average levels found in the general U.S. population. See Figure 8 for the UCI MSS chart of 35 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 5, [8] CDC, “National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals,” 2019, accessed April 23, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . 36 “Multi-site Study,” CDC, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-studies/multi-site-study.html. Source: CDC Figure 7 - CDC Multi-site Study Site Orange County, CA 210 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 18 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Average PFAS Levels in Blood.37 On the chart, the Orange County study site is labeled “CA.” Orange County is the only California location included in the study. Source: CDC Figure 8 - Average PFAS Levels in Blood, CDC Multi-site Study Virtual Open House, July 2025 Because of the phasing out of certain PFAS compounds, serum levels of PFOA and PFOS in the general population of the US have decreased dramatically in recent years. According to the CDC, blood levels of both PFOS and PFOA have steadily decreased in US residents since 1999-2000.38 The half-life of PFAS in the human body is defined as the time required for the PFAS concentrations in serum or plasma to fall by half from the starting concentration .39 Thirteen studies conducted mainly in Europe and the US involving both general populations and exposed workers resulted in half-life estimates for PFOA of 2.73 years (range: 1.48 to 5.1 years), 4.70 years for PFOS (range: 1.69 to 5.7 years), and 5.31 years for PFHxS (range: 2.84 to 8.5 years).40 Based on that information, with no 37 “PFAS Multi-site Study (MSS), Virtual Open House,” CDC, ATSDR, July 28, 2025, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/media/pdfs/2025/08/Open-House-Slides-508.pdf. 38 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Fast Facts: PFAS in the U.S. Population,” CDC, ATSDR, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/data-research/facts-stats/index.html. 39 Isabella Rosato, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) half-lives in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Environmental Research, Volume 242, February 1, 2024, 117743, accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123025471. 40 Isabella Rosato, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) half-lives.” 211 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 19 of 62 additional exposure, it could be anticipated that PFAS may be cleared from the body after an average of five years. However, PFAS exposures continue in general populations primarily through food and water despite production phase outs and regulatory interventions. How Are People Exposed to PFAS? There is general agreement that dietary intake is the largest source of PFAS exposure rather than inhalation or dermal contact.41 Direct exposures due to use in products can be quickly phased out by production phaseouts but exposures driven by PFAS accumulation in the environment, food chains, and contamination of groundwater and drinking water persist because of the continuing PFAS cycle. Human exposures to PFOS and PFOA, the two PFAS that are of greatest regulatory concern, have been declining due to regulatory interventions while understanding of their adverse effects on human health has been rapidly advancing. At the same time, a proliferation of new PFASs has rapidly replaced PFOS and PFOA with shorter chain length PFASs and new chemicals that are difficult to detect using standard methods.42 Emerging evidence from animal experiments suggests some of these alternative PFASs can be equally hazardous.43 41 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure,” 136. 42 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure,” 132. 43 Ibid. 212 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 20 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Source: EPA Figure 9 - How are people exposed to PFAS?44 PFAS Exposure and Excretion Exposure happens when a person breathes, eats, drinks, or touches a chemical and it enters their body. Excretion is the process whereby substances, like PFAS, leave the body. All PFAS can leave the body over time through urine, through menstrual blood or blood donation, or through breast milk. All of these factors could affect PFAS levels measured in blood.45 While PFAS blood test results can tell you the amount of certain PFAS in your blood, the test results will not provide information to pinpoint a health problem and will not predict future health outcomes. You can talk with your healthcare provider about the benefits and limitations of PFAS blood testing.46 44 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, 2, March 11, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-10/final- virtual-pfas-explainer-508.pdf. 45 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Preventing PFAS Exposure,” CDC, ATSDR, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/prevent-exposure/your-body.html. 46 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Testing for PFAS,” CDC, ATSDR, accessed April 17, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/blood-testing/index.html. 213 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 21 of 62 What are the Health Effects of Exposure? Exposure to unsafe levels of PFOA/PFOS may result in adverse health effects including developmental effects to fetuses during pregnancy, cancer, liver effects, immune effects, thyroid effects, and other effects such as cholesterol changes.47 Laboratory studies in animals who were exposed to PFAS found links between the chemicals and increased cholesterol, changes in the body’s hormones, alterations of the immunologic system, decreased fertility, increased risk of cancer (especially kidney and testicular), low birth weight, delayed puberty onset, and birth defects. Since humans and animals react differently to PFAS, not all effects observed in animals may occur in humans. Although many epidemiology studies have examined the potential of PFAS to result in adverse health effects, most of the studies are cross-sectional in design and do not establish causality. Based on several factors outlined in the report of PFAS by the CDC including the consistency of findings across studies, the available epidemiology studies suggest associations between PFAS exposure and several hea lth outcomes in humans.48 47 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 5, [6] A. M. Calafat, L.-Y. Wong, Z. Kuklenyik, J. A. Reidy, and L. L. Needham, “Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the US Population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and Comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1596 - 1602, Nov. 2007, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . 48 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 8, [1] ATSDR, “Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls, Draft for Public Comment,” 2018, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf. 214 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 22 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Source: EPA Figure 10 - Are PFAS Safe?49 PFAS Regulatory Requirements Public drinking water systems are required to follow certain regulations to ensure that the water they serve to their customers is safe to drink.50 In recent years, specific regulations have been issued to address PFAS contamination that require monitoring and taking actions when PFAS is detected in drinking water sources. The following sections present PFAS regulations in the order they were issued by the EPA and California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). PFAS Monitoring Requirements Monitoring refers to the collection and evaluation of data for contaminants that are suspected of being present in water. Samples are collected and analyzed according to EPA-approved laboratory methods. Monitoring results are reported to either the EPA or SWRCB. This data serves as a primary source of occurrence and exposure information used to develop regulatory decisions. OCWD conducts all sampling and analyses and reporting of monitoring results to regulatory agencies on behalf of its member agencies. OCWD owns and operates its 49 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, 1, accessed March 11, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-10/final-virtual-pfas-explainer-508.pdf. 50 “Drinking Water Standards and Regulations: An Overview,” CDC, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/drinking-water/about/drinking-water-standards-and-regulations-an-overview.html. 215 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 23 of 62 own EPA-certified laboratory where it can use analytical methods approved by the EPA. MWDOC member agencies conduct monitoring activities using either their own staff or contractors to collect samples, which are delivered to EPA-certified laboratories for analyses. Laboratories report the results of their analyses to each MWDOC water retailer, who then reports the results to either the EPA or SWRCB. EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule EPA uses the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) to collect data every five years for no more than 30 priority contaminants that are suspected to be present in drinking water and do not have health-based standards set under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).51 The UCMR applies to all large public water systems (PWSs) serving greater than 10,000 people, all small PWSs serving between 3,300 and 10,000 people, and a representative sample of small PWSs serving fewer than 3,300 people. EPA establishes the list of contaminants for each five-year UCMR cycle, considering an initial list of contaminants that are not regulated by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, are known or anticipated to occur at PWSs, and may warrant regulation under the SDWA.52 The SDWA Public Notification Rule ensures that consumers will receive notice if there is a risk to public health from their drinking water. The Public Notification Rule requires that all PWSs notify their customers of the availability of UCMR results no later than 12- months after results are known. CWS are required to report UCMR results in their Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) when unregulated contaminants are detected. The annual drinking water quality report must include notice of availability of unregu lated contaminant monitoring results, the average of the year’s results and the range of detections.53 The Grand Jury obtained UCMR monitoring data for all sampling and analyses conducted to fulfill UCMR requirements for its member agencies. The highest PFAS detections for all OCWD sources during the UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 monitoring cycles are shown at Figure 11. 51 “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” EPA. 52 “Learn About the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule,” EPA, accessed April 7, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/learn-about-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule. 53 “Public Notification Rule,” EPA, accessed April 7, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/public- notification-rule#rule-summary. 216 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 24 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Source: Compiled from OCWD data Figure 11 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources During UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 Monitoring Cycles California State Water Resources Control Board PFAS General Monitoring Orders Beginning in 2020, the SWRCB Division of Drinking Water, based on review of monitoring results from its 2019 PFAS monitoring orders, determined that it was necessary to expand monitoring to groundwater sources located within the vicinity of the PFAS detections. Several PFAS general monitoring orders were issued to PWSs 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2025 that included Orange County groundwater well locations.54 Each of the SWRCB PFAS monitoring orders included requirements for sample collection and laboratory analysis by specific dates, to be followed by monitoring conducted every calendar quarter thereafter.55 These PFAS monitoring orders established Consumer Confidence Report Detection Levels (CCRDL), and Notification and Response Levels for each PFAS chemical to be monitored. A list of the SWRCB PFAS monitoring orders and exhibits identifying groundwater sources required to be monitored are shown at Appendix A, as well as copies of the CCRDL for each monitoring order. The Grand Jury obtained monitoring data for all sampling and analyses conducted to fulfill SWRCB monitoring order requirements for sources listed in the monitoring orders that are owned by their member agencies. The highest PFAS detections for all these OCWD sources are shown at Figure 12. 54 “PFAS DDW General Orders,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/. 55 Ibid. EPA UCMR Number of PFAS on UCMR Contaminants List Maximum PFAS Detection Among all OCWD Sources 2012-2016 UCMR 3 6 PFAS Figure 20, Appendix A 70 ng/L 2022-2026 UCMR 5 29 PFAS Figure 21, Appendix A 29 ng/L 217 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 25 of 62 1OCWD monitoring data as of March 19, 2026 2Outlier result. Next maximum PFAS result 88 ng/L 3Outlier result. Next maximum PFAS result 73.7 ng/L Source: Compiled from OCWD data Figure 12 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources Listed on Each SWRCB Monitoring Order Exhibit A 2025 SWRCB General Order DW 2025-0002-DDW The 2025 SWRCB General Order, issued on December 12, 2025, adopted the initial monitoring requirements in the federal PFAS Rule for each California CWS and non- transient, non-community water system. The 2025 SWRCB Order allows previously acquired data to count toward initial monitoring if collected on or after January 1, 2019 , and reported concentrations no greater than the respective MCL.56 The 2025 SWRCB General Order also included a list of Orange County groundwater sources showing that 151 of the 198 listed sources had completed initial monitoring as required by the federal PFAS Rule.57 PFAS Notification and Response Requirements Notification and response levels are health-based advisory levels established by the SWRCB Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for chemicals in drinking water that do not have established MCLs. When chemicals are found in drinking water at concentrations greater than their notification levels, PWSs are required by law to make specific notifications. When 56 “ORDER DW 2025-0002-DDW,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/order - dw-2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf. 57 “Exhibit A – List of Sources and Required Monitoring Frequency,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards.ca.gov%2Fdrinkin g_water%2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_order%2Fdocs%2Forder -dw-2025-0002- ddw-exhibit-a.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK. SWRCB Order Number of PFAS on Order CCRDL Selected Monitoring Date Range Maximum PFAS Detection Among All OCWD Sources Listed on Order Exihibit A 2020-0003-DDW 18 PFAS Figure 23, Appendix A 8/27/20 - 2/15/21 67.5 ng/L 2021-0003-DDW 18 PFAS Figure 24, Appendix A 2/16/21 - 10/30/22 470 ng/L2 2022-0001-DDW 25 PFAS Figure 25, Appendix A 10/31/22 - 4/24/24 169 ng/L3 2025-0002-DDW 25 PFAS Figure 26, Appendix A 4/25/24 - 3/19/261 73.7 ng/L 218 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 26 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 chemicals are found in drinking water at concentrations greater than their response levels, DDW recommends removal of a drinking water source from service.58 PFAS notification and response levels specified in CCRDLs attached to SWRCB general monitoring orders remain in effect until MCLs are established and become effective. For example, MCLs for specific PFAS will become effective in 2029, and at that time will supersede notification and response levels specified the 2022 CCRDL. PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation In April 2024 EPA announced the final National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for six PFAS (the federal PFAS Rule).59 The PFAS Rule applies to all CWS. The EPA expects that over many years this rule will prevent PFAS exposure in drinking for approximately 100 million people, prevent thousands of deaths, and reduce tens of thousands of serious PFAs-attributable illnesses.60 The PFAS Rule establishes initial monitoring and compliance monitoring requirements, and enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for six PFAS in drinking water. Initial monitoring for six listed PFAS must be implemented beginning April 2024 and must be completed no later than April 26, 2027. Compliance monitoring requirements beginning April 26, 2027, will be either triennial, annual, or quarterly as determined by the SWRCB based on results of the initial monitoring. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) is the highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water. EPA has established legally enforceable MCLs of 4.0 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and PFOS, and 10.0 ppt for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA (GenX chemicals). Figure 13 shows the MCLs and MCLG effective April 26, 2029. Ensuring compliance with drinking water MCLs for the PFAS of most concern is the reason over $600 million (see Figure 17) is being spent to construct PFAS treatment facilities in Orange County. 58 “Drinking Water Notification Levels,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.html. 59 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation,” EPA, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 60 Ibid. 219 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 27 of 62 Source: EPA Figure 13 - PFAS Rule Enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals61 In addition to ongoing compliance monitoring and MCLs, the PFAS Rule also includes additional requirements with future effective dates. Between April 2027 and April 2029, if monitoring shows that drinking water levels exceed MCLs, CWS must implement solutions that reduce these PFAS; results of initial monitoring must be included in the CCR; results of compliance monitoring must be included in the CCR; and public notification is required for monitoring and testing violations. Starting April 2029, CWS that have MCL violations must take action to reduce levels of these PFAS in their drinking water, and public notification is required for MCL violations. Compliance with Regulatory Requirements Consumer Confidence Reports The Grand Jury reviewed the 2025 Consumer Confidence Reports (Water Quality Reports) issued by 31 water retailers serving Orange County. The CCR is to be delivered to all billing customers by July 1 of each year and must include specified information. All 31 water retailers complied with the eight content requirements specified by the EPA, shown in Appendix B.62 Seven of the 11 water retailers operating PFAS 61 “PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation, April 2024,” EPA, accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-04/pfas-npdwr_fact-sheet_general_4.9.24v1.pdf. 62 “Consumer Confidence Report Rule: A Quick Reference Guide,” EPA, accessed April 18, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-05/documents/guide_qrg_ccr_2011.pdf. 220 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 28 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 treatment facilities in Orange County included a PFAS advisory section in their CCRs, while only 55 percent of the 31 water retailers included any PFAS advisory statement. The Grand Jury found that the 31 Orange County water retailers reported either “not detected” results or concentrations below notification thresholds for the six PFAS listed in the EPA PFAS Rule on their 2025 CCRs. After PFAS treatment facilities became operational, OCWD member retailers operating these facilities consistently reported “not detected” results for the same six PFAS. The Grand Jury found that PFAS results from individual wells do not necessarily reflect the quality of water delivered to custom ers, as some tested wells were later placed into inactive status or destroyed. CCRs documented PFAS constituents exceeding notification levels as required and did not report “not detected” results for those constituents. Monitoring results and CCRs are available in the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), California’s official database for tracking public water systems, drinking water quality monitoring, regulatory compliance, and enforcement.63 Notification and Response As of 2020, drinking water retailers with PFAS detections above notification and response levels at wells without PFAS treatment facilities began to rely on imported water, or groundwater blended with imported water to deliver drinking water with PFAS concentrations below notification and response levels. As of 2021, multiple water retailers in Orange County shut down groundwater wells after PFAS concentrations at those wells exceeded established response levels.64 PFAS Rule Initial Monitoring When the 2025 SWRCB General Order adopting the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation was issued in December 2025, 76% of listed Orange County groundwater sources had already completed initial monitoring required to be completed by April 2027. Most of the remaining Orange County sources received credit for previously acquired data, leaving only 6% with all requirements to be completed by April 2027. 63 “Drinking Water Watch,” SWRCB, Division of Drinking Water, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), accessed April 26, 2026, https://sdwis.waterboards.ca.gov/PDWW/. 64 “Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins,” Solano Public Health, accessed April 29, 2026, https://publichealth.networkofcare.org/solano/CommunityResources/News/Article?articleId=124536. 221 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 29 of 62 Proactive Response to PFAS Impacts PFAS Impacts and OCWD Response OCWD coordinated a regional response to PFAS contamination in partnership with its member agencies. These efforts focus on restoring the groundwater basin, which supplies up to 85 percent of the water used by approximately 2.5 million residents in north and central Orange County. A timeline of OCWD response to PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin is shown in Figure 14. As PFAS-impacted groundwater wells began to be shut down in early 2020, public education became a critical component of community water systems’ response. OCWD dedicated resources to public outreach, including the development of informational web pages to inform the public about PFAS impacts and the measures being implemented to address them.65 Source: Compiled from multiple OCWD sources Figure 14 - Timeline of OCWD Response to PFAS in the Santa Ana River Basin PFAS contamination has impacted more than 100 groundwater wells across 15 water retailers. As of this report, 53 wells have returned to service following construction of treatment facilities. Figure 15 Figure 15 - Map of Current and Future PFAS Treatment shows a map of current and future PFAS treatment locations in Orange County. 65 “PFAS education center,” Orange County Water District, accessed April 8, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/water-quality/pfas/. 222 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 30 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Figure 15 - Map of Current and Future PFAS Treatment Locations PFAS Treatment Facilities and Capital Costs Construction of PFAS treatment facilities began in 2020. OCWD executed the PFAS Treatment Facilities and Program Agreement, under which OCWD funds capital costs and shares operating and maintenance (O&M) costs with participating water retailers. Figure 16 summarizes projected PFAS capital funding sources as of January 2026, including OCWD pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) revenue, state and federal grants, an EPA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan, and litigation settlement proceeds. The Grand Jury commends OCWD for securing diversified funding sources to advance timely treatment facility construction. 223 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 31 of 62 Source: OCWD data Figure 16 - Approximate PFAS Capital Funding Sources Figure 17 - Summary of PFAS Treatment FacilitiesFigure 17 Summary of PFAS Treatment Facilities summarizes PFAS treatment facilities by water retailer, opening date, treatment technology, capacity, location, connections, number of wells, and capital costs. Facilities began entering service in mid‑2021, starting with a treatment plant in Fullerton, with additional facilities becoming operational over time. Most facilities use ion exchange technology. Capital costs vary based on the number of affected wells, conveyance pipeline requirements, and treatment facility configuration. OCWD is funding the reasonable costs of designing and constructing PFAS treatment facilities for its member water retailers. Each retailer could either have OCWD design and build the treatment facility or receive reimbursement for designing and constructing the treatment system independently. As of this report, 38 wells with PFAS treatment were built by OCWD and fifteen wells with PFAS treatment were designed and built by the water retailers. Eighteen wells with PFAS treatment construction projects by OCWD have been completed on schedule. Ten wells with PFAS treatment projects, which were built by OCWD, were completed on schedule; however, OCWD experienced cost overruns due to specialized design requirements or owner-requested improvements. An additional 10 wells with PFAS treatment projects that were done by OCWD were completed late and over budget, primarily due to pandemic-related material delays, design complexity, owner-requested improvements, and utility coordination challenges. 224 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 32 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Source: Multiple OCWD and water retailer data Figure 17 - Summary of PFAS Treatment Facilities Community Water System Opening Date Type Capacity Location Connections Wells Total Cost ($M) Actual-to Date ($M) Remaining Budget ($M) Sep-2024 Ion Exchange 51,000 gal/min Nine (9) PFAS treatment facilities at Linda Vista, Katella Ave., Santa Cruz, Energy Field, Brookhurst, Willow Park, Downtown, Boysen Park, and La Palma 14 $117.1 $117.1 $0.0 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 8,000 gal/min Wells 48 & 53 2 $16.0 $0.8 $15.3 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 8,000 gal/min Wells 39 & 47 2 $16.0 $0.9 $15.1 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange TBD Well 51 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 City of Buena Park Jun-2026 Packer 2,200 gal/min Linden Well - Install Packer to reduce flow from PFAS zone(s) in the well - not treatment. 1 $0.6 $0.1 $0.6 Jun-2021 Ion Exchange 2,400 gal/min Kimberly Well 1A 1 $5.3 $4.1 $1.3 Dec-2023 Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) 5,000 gal/min Main Plant 3A 1 $13.7 $13.7 $0.0 Dec-2026 Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) 4,000 gal/min Main Plant Wells 5,6,7,8 4 $12.5 $2.6 $9.9 Jun-2027 Ion Exchange 4,400 gal/min Kimberly Well 2 1 $10.9 $4.3 $6.6 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 1,600 gal/min Sunclipse Well 10 - Pipeline for Treatment at Kimberly 2 Plant Well 15 - New Well Site Needed 2 $15.3 $0.0 $15.3 Jun-2023 Ion Exchange 17,600 gal/min Wells 21, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31 6 $24.3 $24.3 $0.0 Dec-2026 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 19 1 $6.5 $1.9 $4.7 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 13,590 gal/min Wells 22, 26, and 27 3 $31.7 $1.6 $30.2 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 25 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 3,000 gal/min Well 3A 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 3,000 gal/min Well 6 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Sep-2022 Ion Exchange 8,420 gal/min Wells 9, 19, 23, 24 4 $10.0 $9.9 $0.1 Apr-2026 Ion Exchange 7,940 gal/min Wells 20, 21, 22 3 $14.7 $14.7 $0.0 Apr-2026 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Well 28 1 $5.0 $4.0 $1.0 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 5,500 gal/min Wells 25, 27 2 $13.0 $0.4 $12.7 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Well 26 1 $7.0 $0.1 $6.9 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange TBD Well 29 - New Well Currently Being Drilled by City 1 $6.0 $1.0 $5.0 May-2023 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Well 40 1 $5.8 $5.8 $0.0 Sep-2026 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Well 38 1 $7.4 $7.4 $0.0 Dec-2026 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 31 1 $8.5 $6.8 $1.7 Apr-2027 Ion Exchange 3,600 gal/min Well 27&28 2 $17.0 $8.7 $8.3 May-2027 Ion Exchange 9,200 gal/min Wells 27, 28, 31, 38, 40 at John Garthe Reservoir 5 $31.4 $0.0 $31.4 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 12,400 gal/min Wells 16, 29, 33, 41, 43(fut) at Walnut Reservoir 5 $25.0 $0.1 $24.9 May-2025 Ion Exchange 6,400 gal/min Main Street and Prospect Avenue to remove PFAS from four (4) wells in Tustin 4 $32.7 $32.7 $0.0 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Edinger Well 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,300 gal/min 17th St Wells (2 wells treated)2 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min WM-3 (New Well)1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min WM-SC4 (New Well)1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 East Orange County Water District Jun-2024 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Treatment for East and VanderWerff Wells 19,000 2 $8.9 $8.9 $0.0 Nov-2023 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Bradford and Fairhaven Plants 3 $4.4 $4.4 $0.0 Jul-2027 Ion Exchange 940 gal/min Sherrill Plant 1 $3.1 $0.8 $2.4 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 7,620 gal/min La Jolla, Fern Plants 3 $8.3 $0.5 $7.8 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 7,620 gal/min Clair, Beach, and Dale Plants 4 $12.8 $0.9 $11.9 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Lowden 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Orangewood 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Irvine Ranch Water District Oct-2024 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Orange Park Acres Well No. 1 125,000 1 $7.2 $7.2 $0.0 Serrano Water District Feb-2022 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Wells 3 and 5 5,659 2 $6.0 $6.0 $0.0 Yorba Linda Water District Dec-2021 Ion Exchange 13,200 gal/min All ten (10) Yorba Linda wells 11,786 10 $27.7 $27.7 $0.0 Note: $M = Dollars in Millions 106 $607.8 $318.9 $288.9 City of Anaheim City of Tustin 14,500 64,000 City of Fullerton 32,000 Golden State Water Company City of Garden Grove 34,300 City of Orange 46,300 36,000 45,576City of Santa Ana City of Westminster City of Huntington Beach 225 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 33 of 62 Operations and Maintenance Costs Under the PFAS Treatment Facilities and Program Agreement, OCWD reimburses 50 percent of eligible operations and maintenance (O&M) costs incurred by participating water agencies. Eligible O&M costs include treatment media replacement, power and chemical costs, routine maintenance, repairs, staffing, compliance monitoring, regulatory compliance activities, additional pumping, waste disposal, sewer costs, and other necessary system maintenance expenses. Actual PFAS treatment expenses (see Figure 18), which can be found in Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (ACFRs),66 varied primarily due to construction timing and the performance of ion exchange resin media. Specialized resins are a key element in PFAS treatment and help remove PFAS from water using electrostatics. Construction delays meant some treatment facilities were not operational as expected, resulting in lower O&M costs. In FY22 and FY23, initial resin media lasted longer than anticipated and reduced O&M costs. In contrast, FY25 experienced more resin changeouts than anticipated and higher O&M costs. Resin media life varies by treatment system and operating conditions, such as run time, cycling frequency, and production flow rates. OCWD is updating resin performance assumptions and changeout frequency estimates to improve future O&M forecasts. Source: OCWD Figure 18 – OCWD’s Share of PFAS Treatment Facility Annual O&M Cost Program Status and Future Plans The overall OCWD PFAS Treatment Systems Project currently includes 11 water retailers, with construction planned or underway for four additional retailers, expanding the program to 15. Fifty-three treatment systems are operational. Construction 66 “Sound financial management,” Orange County Water District, accessed April 8, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/sound-financial-management/. $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 226 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 34 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 continues on 20 additional systems, with design work underway for 24 more. Here is a list of PFAS projects in design or under construction as of May 2026 : • Golden State Water Company Wells SLON and SORG are still in planning. Well SSYC is in design and is anticipated to start construction in Fiscal Year 26/27. • Tustin 17th Street Well is nearing the start of design. • Huntington Beach Well 3A, Anaheim Wells 39 and 47, Tustin Edinger Well are all in the design phase and are anticipated to start construction in Fiscal Year 26/27. • Buena Park Linden Well is currently in construction. Figure 19 - PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area ResidentsFigure 19 PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area Residents indicates the estimated average monthly cost of PFAS treatment to OCWD service area residents is $1.42 per person. OCWD anticipates continued design and construction activity over several years. Source: OCWD Figure 19 - PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area Residents Total Capital Costs $570,000,000 State & Fed Grants $152,000,000 Litigation Proceeds $121,000,000 Net Capital Costs $297,000,000 Amortized Debt Costs 4.50%Interest Rate 25 Years $297,000,000 Amount Annual Debt Payment $20,029,391 Estimated Annual O&M Cost $22,000,000 Total Annual Cost $42,029,391 Total Monthly Cost $3,502,449 OCWD Population from 19 Member Agencies 2,469,000 persons Monthly cost per person $1.42 Average PFAS Impact to OCWD Service Area Residents Over a 25 year period 227 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 35 of 62 FINDINGS In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 , the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Cou rt. Based on its investigation described herein, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at the following six principal findings: F1 Commercial and industrial chemical manufacturers are a major source of PFAS contamination. Settlement litigation funds are available for community water systems to make claims. F2 PFAS is widespread, and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources. Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports. F3 PFAS exposure is associated with potential adverse human health effects. F4 OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts. F5 Groundwater supplies must either be treated to remove PFAS or must be replaced with imported water supplies that are significantly more expensive than groundwater. Over $500 million is being spent on construction, operations, and maintenance of PFAS treatment facilities in Orange County. F6 Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration. F7 Research on newer PFAS compounds and long-term exposure effects is ongoing. F8 There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among O range County water retailers. Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers’ annual water quality reports in 2025. 228 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 36 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 RECOMMENDATIONS In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 , the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. Based on its investigation described herein, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following recommendations: R1 By September 30, 2026, Orange County Water District (OCWD), in coordination with state and federal agencies, should pursue cost recovery efforts against PFAS manufacturers to offset treatment, monitoring, and long-term remediation costs incurred by local water agencies and ratepayers. [F1, F5] R2 By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. [F2, F4] R3 By September 30, 2026, OCWD, in collaboration with the Orange County Health Care Agency, should update public education and guidance continually as scientific understanding and regulatory standards evolve. [F3] R4 By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. [F2, F8] R5 By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. [F6, F8] R6 By September 30, 2026, OCWD should continuously monitor national and international PFAS research developments and incorporate new findings into future groundwater management, treatment planning, and regulatory compliance strategies. [F7] 229 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 37 of 62 COMMENDATIONS Many Orange County water agencies have demonstrated exceptional leadership in addressing PFAS through large‑scale treatment investments, rigorous monitoring, and public communication. Together, these agencies serve more than two million residents and have implemented some of the most advanced PFAS treatment systems in the nation. The following commendations recognize high‑impact programs and measurable achievements across the region. Orange County Water District (OCWD) OCWD has implemented the largest PFAS treatment program in the United States, designing and constructing treatment systems for over 100 impacted wells across 15 cities and retail water districts, improving water quality for approximately 1.5 million people. OCWD secured a $94M EPA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan, $152M in state and federal grant funding, and $131M in PFAS manufacturers litigation settlement funds to support this effort, which includes the build‑out of more than 30 PFAS treatment facilities. The Grand Jury offers additional commendations to OCWD and its member agencies for their collaborative cost‑sharing agreement. Under this arrangement, OCWD fully funds all PFAS facility design and construction capital expenditures. Ongoing operations and maintenance costs are then shared equally, with OCWD covering 50% and each participating water retailer contributing the remaining 50% for the PFAS treatment facilities they operate. This approach reflects progressive public‑sector planning, demonstrating how agencies can work together to address complex and costly challenges. It also serves as a strong model for future government/private -sector cost‑sharing agreements, illustrating how thoughtful collaboration can enhance efficiency and long‑term public benefit. Anaheim Water Utility Anaheim has launched one of the largest municipal PFAS treatment programs in the country, a multi‑phase, $150M effort to construct treatment systems at nine groundwater sites. The utility serves 64,000 metered customers, historically relying on groundwater for 80% of its supply. PFAS treatment systems for Wells 39 and 47 are among the first in a series of facilities designed to restore local production while meeting stringent state and federal standards. 230 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 38 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Yorba Linda Water District (YLWD) YLWD operates the J. Wayne Miller, Ph.D. Water Treatment Plant, recognized as the nation’s largest PFAS ion‑exchange treatment facility. The plant serves approximately 80,000 customers and has delivered PFAS‑free water for nearly three consecutive years. This facility allows YLWD to optimize its groundwater resources while proactively meeting evolving PFAS regulatory standards. 231 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 39 of 62 RESPONSES The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report: §933 (c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findi ngs and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the a pplicable grand jury final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained for a minimum of five years. §933.05. (a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding. (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons, therefore. (b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: 232 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 40 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated o r reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, therefore. (c) However, if a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the board of supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the board of supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision -making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of th e findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. (d) A grand jury may request a subject person or entity to come before the grand jury for the purpose of reading and discussing the findings of the grand jury report that relates to that person or entity in order to verify the accuracy of the findings prio r to their release. (e) During an investigation, the grand jury shall meet with the subject of that investigation regarding the investigation, unless the court, either on its own determination or upon request of the foreperson of the grand jury, determines that such a meeting would be detrimental. (f) A grand jury shall provide to the affected agency a copy of the portion of the grand jury report relating to that person or entity two working days prior to its public release and after the approval of the presiding judge. No officer, agency, departmen t, or governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to the public release of the final report. (Amended by Stats. 1997, Ch. 443, Sec. 5. Effective January 1, 1998.) Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code §933.05 are required from: 233 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 41 of 62 Orange County Board of Supervisors 90 Day Response Required Findings: F3 Recommendations: R3 Orange County Water District Board of Directors 90 Day Response Required Findings: F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8 Recommendations: R1, R2, R3, R5, R6 Orange County Health Care Agency 90 Day Response Requested Findings: F3 Recommendations: R3 City of Anaheim 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Brea 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 City of Buena Park 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Fountain Valley 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 234 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 42 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 City of Fullerton 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Garden Grove 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Huntington Beach 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of La Habra 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 City of La Palma 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Newport Beach 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Orange 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 235 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 43 of 62 City of San Clemente 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 City of Santa Ana 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Seal Beach 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Tustin 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 City of Westminster 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 East Orange County Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 El Toro Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 236 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 44 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Emerald Bay Service District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 Golden State Water Company 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 Irvine Ranch Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 Laguna Beach County Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 Mesa Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 Moulton Niguel Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 Santa Margarita Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 237 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 45 of 62 Serrano Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 South Coast Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 Trabuco Canyon Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8 Recommendations: R4, R5 Yorba Linda Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8 Recommendations: R2, R4, R5 238 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 46 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Acronyms ACFRS Annual comprehensive financial reports ADONA Ammonium 4 8-dioxa-3h-perfluorononanoate AFFF Aqueous film forming foams used frequently at airports and military bases for firefighting and emergency response training activities AL Regulatory Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry CCR Consumer Confidence Report CCRDL Consumer Confidence Report Detection Levels CDC United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CWS Community Water System DDW Division of Drinking Water DWR Department of Water Resources Effluent Liquid waste from industrial facilities EPA US Environmental Protection Agency FDA Food and Drug Administration GenX Is a Chemours trademark name for a synthetic, short chain organofluorine chemical compound, the ammonium salt of hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA). It can also be used more informally to refer to the group of related fluorochemicals that are used to produce GenX. GWRS Ground water replacement system HALF LIFE Time required for a quantity to reduce to half of its original value HFPO-DA Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid MSS Multi site study MCL Glossary of Terms Maximum Contaminant Level. The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as 239 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 47 of 62 close to the public health goals and maximum contaminant level goals as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water. MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal. The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) sets maximum contaminant level goals. MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level. The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that the addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. MRDLG Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. MWD Metropolitan Water District MWDOC Municipal Water District of Orange County N/A Not applicable ND Not detected NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NL California Notification Level Non-regulatory, health-based advisory levels established by the State Board for contaminants in drinking water for which an MCL has not been established NR Not required to be tested; < = average is less than the detection limit for reporting purposes NTU Nephelometric turbidity units OCWD Orange County Water District O & M Operations and Management PAYGO “Pay as you go” PDWS Primary Drinking Water Standard MCLs, MRDLs and treatment techniques (TTs) for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements pCi/L picoCuries per liter 240 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 48 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 PFAS RULE Establishes enforceable drinking water standards for six PFAS chemicals PFAS Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances PFBA Perfluoro Butanoic Acid PFBS Perfluoro Butane Sulfonic Acid PFHpA Perfluoro Heptanoic Acid PFHxA Perfluoro Hexanoic Acid PFHxS Perfluoro Hexane Sulfonic Acid PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid PFOA Perfluoro Octanoic Acid PFOS Perfluoro Octane Sulfonic Acid PFPeA Perfluoro Pentanoic Acid PHG Public Health Goal The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) sets public health goals. PPB Parts per billion PPM Parts per million PPT Parts per trillion PQL Practical Quantitation Level PWS Public water supply RAA Highest Running Annual Average SAR Santa Ana River SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SDWIS Safe Drinking Water Information System SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board WIFIA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act TT Treatment Technique. A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water UCI University of California, Irvine 241 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 49 of 62 UCMR Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule US United States µmho/cm Micromho per centimeter (equivalent to 1 microsiemens/cm) 242 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 50 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Glossary Cross Sectional Study Examines prevalence of a condition or characteristic at a single point in time across a population to identify patterns, associations, and risk factors Ion Exchange Technology Process that removes/replaces dissolved ions in a solution using solid materials. Non-Community Water Systems Public water systems at locations where people do not reside Non-Transient Water Systems Public water systems that service at least 25 of the same people over six months of the year, but do not live there 243 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 51 of 62 Bibliography California Department of Water Resources. “California’s Groundwater Live: Well Infrastructure.” Accessed April 13, 2026. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/f2b252d15a0d4e49887ba94ac17cc4bb . CAL FIRE. “SB-1044 Compliance: Phasing Out PFAS in Class B Firefighting Foam.” Accessed April 17, 2026. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/pipeline-safety-and- cupa/fire-fighting-equipment-and-foam-pfas California Health and Safety Code Division 104 Part 12 Chapter 4 California Safe Drinking Water Act Section 116275. Accessed March 30, 2026. https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-hsc/division-104/part-12/chapter-4/article- 1/section-116275/. California State Water Resources Control Board. “PFAS Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas. California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water. Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). “Drinking Water Watch.” Accessed April 26, 2026. https://sdwis.waterboards.ca.gov/PDWW/. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Drinking Water Standards and Regulations: An Overview,” Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/drinking- water/about/drinking-water-standards-and-regulations-an-overview.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 2017-18 Overview.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017 . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, “Fast Facts: PFAS in the U.S. Population,” Accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/data-research/facts-stats/index.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Multi-site Study.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-studies/multi-site-study.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Preventing PFAS Exposure.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/prevent-exposure/your-body.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Testing for PFAS.” Accessed April 17, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/blood-testing/index.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. “PFAS Multi-site Study (MSS) Virtual Open House.” July 28, 2025. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/media/pdfs/2025/08/Open-House-Slides-508.pdf. 244 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 52 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Detwiler, Russ. “Reconstructing historical PFAS concentrations in groundwater using a reduced-order modeling framework.” Alburquerque NM, InterPore2025. May 20, 2025. Accessed April 16, 2026. https://events.interpore.org/event/56/contributions/7590/. EcoPulse. “Understanding the PFAS Cycle.” Accessed April 13, 2026. https://www.ecopulsenow.com/insights/understanding-the-pfas-cycle. Happy Family [Cover page, top row, right image of family] – Happy Family Enjoying Fresh Water Together at Home. Concept drink of clear water. Stock Photo | Adobe Stock Lab Glass [Cover page, middle row, right image of chemical lab glass] - Blue laboratory Images - Free Download on Magnific (formerly Freepik), 2026 National Water Research Institute. Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel: Orange County Water District’s Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Study. Fountain Valley, CA, 2004. Accessed April 14, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/wp- content/uploads/sarwqh-final-nwri-panel-report-2004.pdf. Orange County Grand Jury (2025 – 2026). [Cover page, bottom row image of Yorba Linda Water District PFAS Treatment Facility]. Photograph. August 27, 2025. Unpublished internal documentation. Orange County Water District. “How water works in Orange County.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/learning-center/how-water-works-in-oc/. Orange County Water District. “PFAS education center.” Accessed April 8, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/water-quality/pfas/. Orange County Water District. “Sound financial management.” Accessed April 8, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/sound-financial-management/. Pitcher Pouring [Cover page, top row, left image] - Pouring Water into a Glass - Refreshment and Hydration Concept on Wooden Table. 76812373 Stock Photo at Vecteezy, 2026 Rosato, Isabelle, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) half- lives in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Environmental Research. Volume 242. 1 February 2024, 117743. Accessed April 13, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123025471?via%3Dihub. Solano Public Health. “Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins.” Accessed April 29, 2026. Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins. Steenland, Kyle, Fletcher, Tony, and Savitz, David A. “Epidemiologic Evidence on the Health Effects of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA).” National Library of Medicine. Accessed May 12, 2026. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920088/. Stricklin Tommy, Magnifying Glass [Cover page middle row, left image of magnifying glass] – What Is TDS in Drinking Water? Levels, Testing & Solutions | SpringWell, 2026 245 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 53 of 62 Sunderland, Elsie M, et al. “A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly - and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects .” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 3 November 2018. Accessed March 16, 2026. https://sunderlandlab.org/assets/sunderland_jeseerev_2018wsi.pdf. SWRCB. “Drinking Water Notification Levels.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.h tml. SWRCB. “Exhibit A – List of Sources and Required Monitoring Frequency.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards. ca.gov%2Fdrinking_water%2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_order%2 Fdocs%2Forder-dw-2025-0002-ddw-exhibit-a.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK. SWRCB. “ORDER DW 2025-0002-DDW.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general _order/docs/order-dw-2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf. SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions,” 5. [3] 3M Company, “Fluorochemical use, distribution and release overview.,” AR226-0550, 1999. updated March 19, 2020. Accessed March 25, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions.” 5. [6] A. M. Calafat, L.-Y. Wong, Z. Kuklenyik, J. A. Reidy, and L. L. Needham, “Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the US Population: Data from the National Health and Nutriti Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and Comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1596– 1602, Nov. 2007. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions,” 5. [8] CDC, “National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals,” 2019. Accessed April 23, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . SWRCB, “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions.” 8. [1] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), “Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls, Draft for Public Comment,” 2018. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf . SWRCB. “PFAS DDW General Orders.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general _order/. SWRCB. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), What are PFAS?” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/pfas/. Temkin, Alexis and Subramaniam, Varun. “’Forever chemicals’ contaminate nearly 40% of non-organic California-grown produce.” Environmental Working Group. Accessed April 6, 2026. https://www.ewg.org/research/forever-chemicals-contaminate-nearly-40- non-organic-california-grown-produce. 246 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 54 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 University of California, Irvine. “UCI PFAS Health Study.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/. University of California, Irvine. “UCI PFAS Health Study, Frequently Asked Questions.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/frequently-asked-questions/. University of California, Irvine, Wen School of Population & Public Health. “The ‘Forever Chemical’ Detective.” February 12, 2026. Accessed May 12, 2026. https://publichealth.uci.edu/2026/02/12/the -forever-chemical-detective/. United States EPA. “Consumer Confidence Report Rule: A Quick Reference Guide.” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014- 05/documents/guide_qrg_ccr_2011.pdf. United States EPA. “Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO). Facility Search – Enforcement and Compliance Data.” Accessed April 26, 2026. https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility-search. United States EPA. “Learn About the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule.” Accessed April 7, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/learn-about-unregulated- contaminant-monitoring-rule. United States EPA. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/pfas. United States EPA. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. United States EPA. “PFAS Explained.” Accessed March 11, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained. United States EPA. “Public Notification Rule.” Accessed April 7, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/public-notification-rule#rule-summary. United States EPA. “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. United States EPA. “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” describing statutory authority at 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., Accessed My 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/laws- regulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act. Zimmerman Janet, Santa Ana River [Cover page top row, center image], Water agencies pledge cooperation to help the Santa Ana River – Orange County Register, published September 20, 2014 247 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 55 of 62 Appendix A Unregulated Contaminated Monitoring Rule (UCMR) Contaminants Lists, PFAS Contaminants Figure 20 - UCMR 3 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants 248 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 56 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Figure 21 - UCMR 5 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants 249 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 57 of 62 State Water Resources Control Board PFAS General Monitoring Orders, 2020-2025 SWRCB Order Exhibit Title Internet URL Web Address 2020 SWRCB General Order DW 2020-0003-DDW https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte d_orders/drinking_water/2020/pfas_go_2020_0003_ddw/ pfas_go_2020_0003_ddw.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to General Order No. DW 2020-0003-DDW (for DDW Section 5), https://wqts.com/wp- content/uploads/2020/09/go_exhibit_a_section5.pdf 2021 SWRCB General Order DW-2021-0001-DDW https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte d_orders/drinking_water/2021/pfas_go_2021_0001_ddw/ a5.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to General Order No. DW 2021-0001-DDW (For DDW Section 5) https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte d_orders/drinking_water/2021/pfas_go_2021_0001_ddw/ a5.pdf 2022 Amended General Order DW 2022- 0001-DDW https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/amended- pfas-general-order-2022-final.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to General Order No. DW 2022-0001-DDW (Amended) https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/pfas_go_2022 -0001-DDW_ExhibitA.pdf 2025 SWRCB General Order DW 2025-0002-DDW https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/order-dw- 2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to General Order DW 2025-0002-DDW https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https% 3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards.ca.gov%2Fdrinking_water %2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_ord er%2Fdocs%2Forder-dw-2025-0002-ddw-exhibit- a.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK Figure 22 - SWRCB PFAS General Monitoring Orders Issued 2020 through 2025 250 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 58 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 State Water Resources Control Board General Monitoring Orders PFAS Constituents Lists Figure 23 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2020-0003-DDW, PFAS Constituents 251 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 59 of 62 Figure 24 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2021-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents 252 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 60 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Figure 25 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2022-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents 253 PFAS and Public Awareness Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 61 of 62 Figure 26 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2025-0002-DDW, PFAS Constituents 254 PFAS and Public Awareness Page 62 of 62 Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Appendix B Source: EPA Figure 27 - EPA Eight Content Requirements of a Consumer Confidence Report 255 Casey McKeon | Mayor Office: (714) 536 – 5237 | 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov August 18, 2026 Honorable Sheila F. Hanson Presiding Judge of the Superior Court Central Justice Center, Dept. C1 700 Civic Center Drive West Santa Ana, CA 92701 and Orange County Grand Jury 700 Civic Center Drive West Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: JUNE 9, 2026, GRAND JURY REPORT “PFAS and Public Awareness, A Closer look at Orange County Drinking Water” Dear Judge Hanson: As requested by the Orange County Grand Jury, the City of Huntington Beach has reviewed the June 9, 2026 report entitled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” and is submitting this formal response to the applicable Findings and Recommendations. The Huntington Beach City Council has authorized me to submit this response on behalf of the City. The City of Huntington Beach appreciates the Grand Jury’s efforts to investigate and report on issues affecting water quality and water supply reliability. Water management is a highly complex subject, and the public appropriately relies on its elected officials and public water agencies to ensure that adequate water supplies are available and that drinking water remains safe. The Grand Jury’s report serves as a valuable resource by increasing public awareness of these important issues, particularly regarding PFAS, public education, and ongoing treatment and removal efforts. From the City’s perspective, Orange County benefits from dedicated water professionals and agencies that are committed to ensuring a safe, reliable, and sustainable water 256 Office: (714) 536 – 5553 | 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov supply. These organizations continue to make significant investments and implement innovative solutions to protect public health and strengthen long-term water reliability. The Grand Jury’s report thoroughly examines the extent of PFAS detections and evaluates the response by local water agencies. The report recognizes that Orange County has implemented one of the most comprehensive PFAS testing, public education, and treatment programs in California. In particular, the Orange County Water District (OCWD), in partnership with its member agencies, has coordinated a substantial regional response to PFAS contamination. To date, OCWD and its partner agencies have invested more than $600 million in capital improvements to remove PFAS from local groundwater supplies. The City of Huntington Beach is proud to serve as both a groundwater producer and a member agency of OCWD, an internationally recognized leader in water reclamation and potable water reuse. Through the Groundwater Replenishment System, OCWD purifies 100 percent of the reclaimable wastewater received from the Orange County Sanitation District, producing approximately 130,000 acre-feet of purified water annually. This represents roughly one-third of the total water demand within the OCWD service area and significantly enhances local water supply reliability. The City of Huntington Beach concurs with the Grand Jury’s recommendations. Through the sustained efforts of OCWD and its regional partner agencies, substantial progress has been made in ensuring the safety of local groundwater supplies while simultaneously reducing the region’s dependence on imported water from Northern California and the Colorado River. The City has been requested to respond to Findings F2, F4, F6, and F8, as well as Recommendations R2, R4, and R5. The original Findings and Recommendations are reproduced below, followed by the City’s responses, which are presented in bold. F2 PFAS is widespread, and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources. Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports. The City of Huntington Beach agrees that community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports to be consistent with requirements established by the Division of Drinking Water. The City of Huntington Beach currently includes this information in the Consumer Confidence Report. 257 Office: (714) 536 – 5553 | 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov F4 OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts. The City of Huntington Beach agrees that OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts. OCWD and the Producers it serves provide safe and reliable drinking water that consistently meets all state and federal drinking water standards. F6 Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration. The City of Huntington Beach agrees with this finding. F8 There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among Orange County water retailers. Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers’ annual water quality reports in 2025. The City of Huntington Beach maintains a dedicated PFAS education section on its website and included a PFAS advisory in its 2025 Consumer Confidence Report. In addition, the City’s website provides direct reference to the PFAS information hosted by the Orange County Water District, including the PFAS Fact Sheet and the Quarterly PFAS Update, to ensure the public has access to clear and comprehensive educational resources. R2 By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. [F2, F4] OCWD continues to maintain a proactive and comprehensive monitoring program for PFAS and funds treatment in cooperation with its Producers. These PFAS water quality monitoring efforts have continued for more than a decade and include multiple US EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule programs that include PFAS (UCMR3 and UCMR5) as well as multiple PFAS monitoring orders issued by the California Division of Drinking Water. 258 Office: (714) 536 – 5553 | 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov OCWD has steadily expanded PFAS monitoring to include additional drinking water wells, groundwater monitoring wells, and surface waters throughout the Orange County groundwater basin and the Santa Ana River watershed. Through these efforts, OCWD will ensure that all its Producer agencies meet the initial monitoring requirements contained within US EPA’s PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). OCWD has continued to meet with and maintain communication with many local water agencies and regulatory agencies to share PFAS monitoring results and related information. OCWD has also performed multiple phases of pilot testing of PFAS treatment media to help Producers determine the best treatment options. OCWD has implemented a PFAS treatment policy to fund 100% of the design and construction, and 50% of the operation and maintenance costs for Producer drinking water well treatment facilities. OCWD and the Producer water systems have worked closely and collaboratively to develop this PFAS treatment policy and maintain PFAS agreements in support of the policy resulting in implementation of treatment throughout OCWD well in advance of much of the rest of the country. R4 By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. [F2, F8] The City of Huntington Beach includes a PFAS advisory and compliance information in its Consumer Confidence Report and provides the same information on the City’s website. These materials are presented using clear and understandable language to ensure accessibility for the public. R5 By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. [F6, F8] The City of Huntington Beach will continue to provide the public with educational PFAS information, resources, and updates through its website and annual Consumer Confidence Report. The City also directs customers to the Orange County Water District’s PFAS materials to ensure consistent, accurate, and comprehensive public information. In addition, the City participates in community outreach events such as Surf City Nights and the Citizens Academy to further engage and inform residents about PFAS and drinking water quality. 259 Office: (714) 536 – 5553 | 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Sincerely, Casey McKeon Mayor 260 Response to Grand Jury Report “PFAS and Public Awareness, a Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” City Council Meeting August 18, 2026 261 Purpose of the Report • Identifies PFAS levels detected by Orange County drinking water agencies. • Evaluates how agencies have responded to recent PFAS regulatory requirements. • Reviews progress in planning and installing PFAS treatment facilities. • Assesses implementation of public education programs about PFAS in drinking water. • Provides findings and recommendations to strengthen PFAS reporting and expand public outreach. 262 PC 933.05 Response • For Each Finding: •Must state Agree or Disagree (wholly or partially) • If disagreeing, must specify which part and explain the reasons • For Each Recommendation: •Must choose one of the following: • Implemented (include summary of actions taken) • Will be implemented (provide a timeline) • Requires further analysis (explain scope and provide timeline) 263 Grand Jury Findings • F2 PFAS is widespread, and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources. Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports. • F4 OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts. • F6 Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration. • F8 There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among Orange County water retailers. Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers’ annual water quality reports in 2025. • The City Agrees with the Grand Jury Findings. 264 Grand Jury Recommendations • R2 By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. • R4 By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. • R5 By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. • The Recommendations of the Grand Jury have been implemented. 265 Staff Recommendations • Approve Transmittal letter with formal response • Authorize the Mayor to sign and submit the response to the Presiding Superior Court Judge • Alternative Action: • Do not approve the formal response, and direct staff accordingly. 266 Questions? 267 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-658 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager PREPARED BY:Marissa Sur, Assistant City Manager Subject: Introduction of the Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association Statement of Issue: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA) expired on June 30, 2025. A Tentative Agreement on the terms of a successor MOU has been reached and is now presented. Financial Impact: Pursuant to the terms of the Tentative Agreement with HBPOA, the total projected cost is $9,808,770. Recommended Action: Receive and consider the proposed Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association for the period of July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2029, pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Ordinance No. 4154. Alternative Action(s): Do not consider the proposed MOU and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: The HBPOA is a recognized employee association representing approximately 259 full-time employees. The City and HBPOA began meeting in November 2025 to negotiate the terms of a successor MOU, and a Tentative Agreement was reached in July 2026. Salient provisions of the Tentative Agreement between the City and HBPOA include: -Term of three years, expiring June 30, 2029 -Salary adjustments on July 1 of each year of the proposed MOU term, 8%, 4%, and 5%, respectively City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 2 268 File #:26-658 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 -Increase to city medical contribution of $75 for employee only coverage, $150 for two-party and $200 for family coverage effective January 1, 2027, and January 1, 2028 -Updated language regarding proof of eligibility for education pay A summary of the Tentative Agreement between the City and the HBPOA is included as Attachment 1, and a proposed redline MOU reflecting these terms is included as Attachment 2. The Fiscal Impact Report is included as Attachment 3. Following City Council review of the Tentative Agreement and proposed MOU, a final version of the successor MOU will be presented at the September 1, 2026, City Council meeting. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. Summary of Tentative Agreement 2. Proposed Memorandum of Understanding Redline 3. Fiscal Impact Report 4. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 2 269 Tentative Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA) Article # Subject Proposal I Term July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2029 VI(A) Salary Schedule Effective June 24, 2026, employees will receive a base salary increase of eight percent (8%). Effective the pay period July 1, 2027, employees will receive a base salary increase of four percent (4%). Effective the pay period including July 1, 2028, employees will receive a base salary increase of five percent (5%). VII (1a) Special Pays – Police Professional Development Plan Clarifying language regarding acceptable documentation for employees who have earned their BA/BS to submit when requesting this special compensation. X(B1(b)) Health and Other Insurance Benefits – Maximum Employer Contribution Toward Flex Benefits Effective January 1, 2027, the City’s maximum monthly contribution will increase by $75 (employee only), $150 (employee +1) and $200 (family). Effective January 1, 2028, the City’s maximum monthly contribution will increase by $75 (employee only), $150 (employee +1) and $200 (family). 270 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (Hereinafter called CITY) And THE HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION (Hereinafter called ASSOCIATION or POA) PREAMBLE WHEREAS, the designated representatives of the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association have met and conferred in good faith with respect to salaries, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the employees represented by the Association; NOW THEREFORE, this Memorandum of Understanding is made to become effective July 1, 20236, and it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE I – TERM OF MOU This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall be in effect for a term commencing on July 1, 20236, and ending at 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 20269. Except as expressly provided herein, no further improvements or changes in the salaries and monetary benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of the employees represented by the Association shall take effect during the term of this agreement and the Association expressly waives any right to request any improvements or changes in salaries or monetary benefits and other terms and conditions of employment specifically provided herein for the employees represented in the unit. Provided, however, the City and Association shall, upon request, meet and confer to address issues not specifically covered by provisions of this MOU, and/or discussed during the meet and confer process immediately preceding the adoption of the current MOU. ARTICLE II – REPRESENTATIONAL UNIT / CLASS It is recognized that the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association is the employee organization which has the right to meet and confer in good faith with the City on behalf of employees of the Huntington Beach Police Department within the classification titles as outlined in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. 271 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 2 ARTICLE III – MANAGEMENT RIGHTS The City and Chief of Police retain all rights, powers and authority to manage and direct the performance of police services and the work force, except as modified by the MOU. Nothing herein shall change the City’s obligation to meet and confer as to the effects of any such management decision upon wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment or be construed as granting the City or Chief of Police the right to make unilateral changes in wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment. The parties agree that the City has the right to unilaterally make decisions on all matters that are outside the scope of bargaining. Such matters include, but are not limited to, consideration of the merits, necessity, level or organization of police ser vices, staffing requirements, overtime assignments, number and location of work stations, nature of work to be performed, contracting for any work or operation, reasonable employee performance standards, reasonable work and safety rules and regulations. ARTICLE IV – EXISTING CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT Except as expressly provided herein, the adoption of this MOU shall not change existing terms and conditions of employment that have been established in prior agreements between the City and the Association. ARTICLE V – SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this MOU or any additions or amendments thereof, or the application thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of the court of competen t jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution or its application to other persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this MOU and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion, and any additions or amendments thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions, or the application thereof to any person, be declared invalid or unconstitutiona l. ARTICLE VI – SALARY SCHEDULE A. Salary Schedule- Employees shall be compensated at hourly salary rates by classification title and salary range during the term or this agreement as set out in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. 272 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 3 Effective June 240, 20236, employees will receive a base salary increase of five eight percent (85.0%). Effective the pay period including July 1, 20247, employees will receive a base salary increase of four percent (54.0%). Effective the pay period including July 1, 20258, employees will receive a base salary increase of five percent (5.0%). B. Collection of Payroll Overpayments – In the event that a payroll overpayment is discovered and verified, and considering all reasonable factors including the length of time that the overpayment was made and if and when the employee could have reasonably known about such overpayment, the City will take action to collect from the employee the amount of overpayment(s). Such collection shall be processed by payroll deduction over a reasonable period of time considering the total amount of overpayment. In the event the employee separates from employment during the collection period, the final amount shall be deducted from the last payroll check of the employee. If applicable, the balance due from the employee shall be communicated upon employment separation if the last payroll check does not sufficiently cover the amount due the City. It shall be the responsibility of the employee and the City to periodically monitor the accuracy of compensation payments or reimbursements due to the possibility of a clerical oversight or error. The City reserves the right to also collect compensation overpayments caused by or the result of misinterpretation of a pay provision by non - authorized personnel. The interpretation of all pay provisions shall be administered by the City Manager, or designee and as adopted by the City Council. Unauthorized compensation payments shall not constitute a past practice. ARTICLE VII- SPECIAL PAY A. Educational Pay 1. Police Professional Development Plan A. 1. The Professional Development Plan for sworn personnel shall be as follows: a. College Degree Program 273 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 4 i. Upon earning an AA Degree or equivalent units in a degree program, an employee shall be paid three percent (3%) of base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation. i. ii. Upon earning a BA/BS Degree, an employee shall be paid six percent (6%) of base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation. The pay is in lieu of pay received under sub-section (a)i above. iii. College degrees or College units under this program shall conform to POST standards for accreditation as noted in POST Regulation 9070 (c)(1)(A) and (B). iii.iv. Effective the pay period following City Council adoption of this MOU, the parties agree that if a pending student loan prevents an accredited university from producing a diploma related to an employee’s completion of a AA/AS or BA/BS degree, acceptable documentation to process an employee’s request for Educational Pay shall include an official letter from the accredited university confirming completion of requirements for the degree. This alternative approval method is only applicable to employees who complete their education during employment, and does not apply to new hires submitting proof of a Ddegree. iv.v. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for the College Degree Program is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) Educational Incentive Pay. b. POST Certificate Program i. Upon verification of having earned an Intermediate POST Certificate, an employee shall be paid three percent (3%) of base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation. ii. Upon verification of having earned an Advanced POST Certificate, effective June 24, 2023, an employee shall be paid eight percent (8%) of base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation. This pay is in lieu of pay received under sub-section (b)i above. iii. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for the POST Certificate Program is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) Peace Officer Standard Training (POST) Certificate Pay. 274 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 5 c. Stipulations: i. Eligibility must be approved by the Chief of Police. An employee must maintain their certification to remain eligible for the pay. ii. Obtaining transcripts or other acceptable documentation is the employee’s responsibility. An employee may verify equivalent units (to an AA degree) by submission of written verification that the employee has completed 60 or more accredited units. d. POST Supervisory Leadership Institute: i. Police Sergeants that have completed the POST Supervisory Leadership Institute and received their appropriate certification for completion shall receive $80 per month. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for the POST Supervisory Leadership Institute is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571 (a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) Peace Officer Standard Training (POST) Certificate Pay. The maximum benefit that may be paid to an employee under Article VII, Section (A)(1) (Police Professional Development Plan) is fourteen percent (14%) of the base hourly rate. In addition, Sergeants may be eligible for POST Supervisory Leadership Institute pay as provided in subparagraph 3(d)(i), above. 2. Certified Flight Instructor Pay – Employees who have received the certification as a Certified Flight Instructor shall be paid five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate of pay. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) as Educational Incentive Pay. 3. Nurse Certification or Degree Premium - Employees in the classification of Detention Shift Supervisor, who possess a Nurse certification or Degree (because possession of a Nurse Certification or Degree is not required for the position and will enhance their ability to do their job), shall receive five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate, for so long as they possess the Nursing Degree or certification. a. Overtime i. Overtime shifts among employees in the Detention Officer, Nurse Detention Officer and Detention Shift Supervisor classifications shall be 275 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 6 assigned using a computerized staffing program, such as In -Time, and according to the parameters set forth herein. ii. The parameters for programing the computerized staffing program shall be those parameters currently utilized for patrol overtime, and shall include the following: 1) Short Notice overtime (i.e., less than 72 hours advance notice) will be filled by the employee who first responds affirmatively to an email or text message notification of an available shift. 2) Regular Notice Overtime (i.e., 72 hours or more advance notice) will be assigned to an employee who has indicated an availability for the shift and who has worked the least overtime hours that deployment. If two or more employees have the same number of overtime hours worked, the shift shall be assigned to the employee with the greatest seniority. b. Detention Shift Supervisor: i. Assignment to Vacant Shifts: Employees in the Detention Shift Supervisor classification will be assigned to work for vacant shifts in the Detention Shift Supervisor classification, subject to the parameters in paragraph 1. However, if no Detention Shift Supervisor has indicated an ability to work a vacant shift in the computerized staffing program, the shift will then be assigned to an employee in the Nurse Detention Officer or Detention Officer classifications, applying the above parameters. The Nurse Detention Officer or Detention Officer assigned to the shift will work in their regular assignment, not as the Supervisor. ii. Shift Bidding: Detention Shift Supervisors shall bid shifts by seniority, according to their time as a Detention Shift Supervisor. c. Nurse Detention Officer and Detention Officer: i. Assignment to Vacant Shifts: Employees in the classifications of Nurse Detention Officer and Detention Officer, will be assigned to work for vacant shifts in either classification, (e.g., because of a leave of absence). The parameters set forth in paragraph 1 will be followed by using the combined list (which includes seniority) of both Nurse Detention Officers and Detention Officers. Employees in both classifications can fill a vacancy for either classification. 276 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 7 Employees in the classification of Detention Shift Supervisor are not permitted to be assigned to work a vacancy for either a Nurse Detention Officer or Detention Officer unless there are no employees available (as set forth in paragraph 1 above) in the Nurse Detention Officer or Detention Officer classifications to work the shift. d. Shift Bidding: Employees in the classifications of Nurse Detention Officer and Detention Officer will bid shifts based on seniority. There will not be separate allocations of Detention Officer and Nurse Detention Officer positions on each shift, rather there will be a number of available shifts that may be bid equally by employees in either classification. The names of employees in both classifications will be placed on one seniority list, not individual seniority lists for each classification. Employees will be permitted to bid shifts each deployment. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for Nurse Certification or Degree Premium for employees in the classification of Detention Shift Supervisor is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) Educational Incentive Pay. B. Special Assignment Pay The Special Assignments provided to members of the unit are set forth below. Should the City create any new special assignments, the parties agree meet and confer over the pay and address the pensionability of the pay. Selection Process for Special Assignments Employees will be selected for Special Assignments 1-11 below through a testing process, which will at a minimum include the following components: a. Submittal of written request for the assignment that shows that any applicable prerequisites are satisfied. b. Written examination, which will be weighed 25% of total score. c. Oral Interview, which will be weighed 75% of total score. The oral interview panel will include a supervisor for desired assignment. d. A ranked eligibility list will be established based on candidates’ total score. e. The Division Commander and Police Chief shall appoint candidates to the special assignment using a “rule of five” (i.e., any candidate among the top-five scoring 277 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 8 candidates may be selected). When a candidate is appointed, the sixth-highest scoring candidate will then move into the top-five for future appointments. f. The duration of eligible lists shall be 6 months. As set forth below, each special assignment may have additional selection criteria. 1. Detective Division Premium Employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to the Investigation Division (which includes the Detective Bureau and the Special Investigations Bureau) shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Detective Division Premium. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section 3 is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Detective Division Premium. Assignment to Detectives: a. Existing detectives in permanent assignments shall be permitted to remain in those assignments (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. b. All Detective Bureau positions are considered “permanent” assignments, except in each “section” of the detective bureau (i.e., Crimes Against Persons, General, Economic) there shall be one position (one per section except Major Crime) that is considered a “rotational” position. A rotational position shall be for a five (5) year term. c. As incumbent “permanent” detectives leave their positions, the first vacancy in each section shall be converted to a rotational position. All other future vacancies from permanent positions shall be filled by selections to “permanent” position. Future vacancies from rotational positions shall be filled by selections to “rotational” positions. d. When a permanent position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Detectives in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. Assignment to Special Investigations: e. All Special Investigations bureau positions (i.e., Narcotics, Vice, Gangs, Crime Task Force, Regional Task Force and Intel) are considered rotational positions. 278 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 9 f. A rotational position shall be for a five (5) year term. 2. Motorcycle Patrol Premium Employees regularly assigned to motorcycle duty shall be paid five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Motorcycle Patrol Premium. This pay shall also be paid for the hours an employee is in training for this assignment. The parties agree any time spent on maintenance and/or cleaning of motorcycles shall be on-duty unless overtime has been approved in advance. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Motorcycle Patrol Premium. Assignment to Motors: a. Existing police officers assigned as Motors in permanent assignments shall be permitted to remain in those assignments (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. b. There shall be five (5) Motor positions designated as “permanent” positions. The rest of the positions in Motors are considered rotational positions. c. Rotational positions shall be for a five (5) year term. d. As incumbent “permanent” Motors leave their positions, the first five motors vacancies shall be filled by employees in rotational positions. They shall be considered “rotational” and subject to a five (5) year term. e. When a permanent position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Motors in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. 3. Police Investigator Premium This is special assignment compensation to those officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to or investigative accidents. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Police Investigator Premium. 279 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 10 The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section 3 is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Police Investigator Premium. a. Field Accident Investigator b. Traffic Investigator Traffic Investigator selection criteria: 1) There shall be one (1) traffic Investigator position designated as a “permanent” position. The existing two employees assigned as traffic Investigators are in a permanent assignment and shall be permitted to remain in that assignment (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. 1)2) The first traffic investigator position to become vacant shall be converted to a rotational position. Should additional non -motor traffic investigator positions be authorized, they shall be considered “rotational”. All rotational traffic investigator positions shall be subject to a five (5) year term. 2)3) When a permanent traffic Investigator position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Traffic Investigators in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. c. Traffic Investigator Supervisor (Police Sergeant). These employees are responsible for the call-outs for Traffic Investigators and supervise the investigations. This assignment is rotational and subject to a five (5) year term. 4. Police Liaison Premium This is special assignment compensation to those Police Officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to function as a liaison between special persons, groups or courts and the police department. This pay is provided to Police Officers who are assigned to the Homeless Task Force, a School Resource Officer or to the 280 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 11 Downtown Patrol Liaison Team. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Police Liaison Premium. Each of the above assignments is considered rotational and subject to a five (5) year term. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Police Liaison Premium. 5. Safety Officer Training/Coordinator Premium This is special assignment compensation to those employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to instruct personnel in safety procedures who are assigned to the Training Unit. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Safety Officer Training/Coordinator Premium. This assignment is rotational and subject to a five (5) year term. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Safety Officer Training/Coordinator Premium. 6. DUI Traffic Officer Premium This is special assignment compensation to police officers who are assigned to the DUI Unit and who are routinely and consistently assigned to enforce Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol or drug laws. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Safety Officer Training/Coordinator Premium. This assignment is rotational and subject to a five (5) year term. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) DUI Traffic Officer Premium. 7. Police Administrative Officer Premium 281 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 12 This is special assignment compensation to police officers who are assigned as a Bbackgrounds Iinvestigator, employees assigned to the Professional Standards Unit and the Administrative Sergeant (who supervises the Background Investigator and the PIO) and who are routinely and consistently assigned to police administration to provide support for the Police Chief and command staff in the operation of the police department. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Police Administrative Officer Premium. The two assignments in this section are rotational and subject to a five (5) year term. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Police Administrative Officer Premium. 8. 8. Training Premium Training Premium is compensation to employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to train employees. FTO Compensation - Compensation shall be one-quarter (.25) hours pay at the base hourly rate, for each hour worked as a Field Training Officer in addition to other compensation for the following assignments: a. Police Officers who have successfully completed a POST certified Field Training Officer Course and have been designated Field Training Officers, assigned to Traffic or Patrol Bureaus, shall be eligible for Field Training Officer compensation. b. Detention Employees designated to act as Training Officers. c. Motor Officers designated to act as Training Officers. d. Communication Employees designated as Training Officers. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Training Premium. 9. Canine Officer/Animal Premium a. Pay for Handling, Training and Boarding a Canine. 282 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 13 This is special assignment compensation to those officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to handle, train and board a canine. These employees shall be paid three percent (3%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Officer/Animal Premium. Assignments to the canine handler position shall generally be “for the life of the dog”. If the assignment is of a duration that is less than three years, due to an issue with the canine, an additional dog may be assigned and still count as one term. A canine handler may be assigned a second term as a handler, upon request and approval of the Police Chief, who has full discretion whether to approve a second term or not. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to handle, train and board a canine is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Canine Officer/Animal Premium. b. Pay for the off-duty care, feeding and grooming of the canine and the routine, off-duty canine-related maintenance of their canine car. Employees assigned to canine duty shall also be paid for the off-duty care, feeding and grooming of their canine and the routine, off-duty canine-related maintenance of their canine car. The City and the Association have considered the time that canine officers typically spend on off-duty canine care, and determined it to be fifteen (15) hours per month. Employees assigned to canine duty shall be paid fifteen (15) hours per month at the overtime rate of pay based on the canine care salary rate. The canine care salary rate shall be two-thirds (2/3) of the Canine Officer's base pay rate, excluding any specialty or similar pays. In negotiating this MOU, the City requested that the Association conduct an actual inquiry of the hours which employees assigned to Canine duties perform each month to ensure compliance with the FLSA and in particular the case of Leever v. City of Carson City (9th Cir. 2004). The Associa tion advised the City that the inquiry revealed that the hours to which the parties have agreed – (fifteen hours per month) accurately describes the time such employees are performing such duties each month. 283 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 14 In addition to the fifteen (15) hours of pay per month described in the preceding paragraph, canine officers shall be paid for off -duty veterinary visits and extraordinary off-duty care, provided that, absent an emergency, the Officers shall obtain supervisor approval for such care and shall submit payroll exemption slips. Any such additional canine compensation shall be paid at their overtime rate as defined in Article IX.A.4. The pay for the off-duty care, feeding and grooming of their canine and the routine, off-duty canine-related maintenance of their canine car is not pensionable and will not be reported to CalPERS. 10. Aircraft/Helicopter Pilot Premium This is special assignment compensation to those safety employees who are routinely and consistently assigned as aircraft/helicopter pilots. Employees assigned to the Air Support Unit to pilot the helicopter as their primary duty assignment (i.e., assigned at least 50% of their scheduled hours in a pay period) shall be paid eight percent (8%) of their base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation. The parties agree this pay shall commence upon assignment to the Aero unit. This assignment is a permanent assignment. Employees shall be permitted to remain in this assignment until they voluntarily relinquish the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separated from the City. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Aircraft Helicopter Pilot Premium. 11. Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium This is special assignment compensation to those employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to a lead or supervisory position over other employees, subordinate classifications, or agency-sponsored program participants. This pay is available to those employees in the classification of Administrative Dispatch Supervisor who manage scheduling and supervise the training program and trainers in the Communication Center. These employees will be paid three percent (3%) of their case hourly pay for Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium. 284 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 15 This pay is also available to those employees designated as a Chief Pilot/Safety Officer who shall be paid five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium. The duties, eligibility requirements and selection process are set forth in Exhibit I to the MOU. This assignment is a permanent assignment. Employees shall be permitted to remain in this assignment until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separated from the City. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium. 12. Bilingual Premium Employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to positions requiring communication skills in languages other than English, who are qualified (as set forth below) shall be paid five percent (5%) of their base hourly rate of pay for Bilingual Premium. Human Resources will have written and oral tests designed and administered to test for qualifications. The qualifications will cover the more routine foreign language requirements in filling out crime reports, interviewing suspects and witnesses, and responding to the public on matters relating to an incident or other police action. The languages included will be Spanish, Vietnamese and American Sign Language. Additional languages may be approved at the discretion of the Chief of Police. Authorization of qualified employees for bilingual compensation will be based on the following: a. A need for the employee to use the language in the City to support the implementation of police operations. b. At the discretion of the Chief of Police, the number of employees qualified in each category may be limited based on department needs. 285 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 16 c. Successful completion of tests authorized by the Chief of Police will be required to qualify for bilingual pay for any of the languages. The City reserves the right to re-test at the Chief of Police’s discretion, no more frequently than once every 12-months. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Bilingual Premium. C. Shift Differential – Detention and Communication Employees’ required to work on a regular assigned shift that occurs during swing shift or graveyard shift, as defined by departmental policy through the meet and confer process, shall be paid five percent (5%) of the employee’s base hourly rate of pay in addition to other compensation for all hours worked during the swing or graveyard shift. The parties agree the department policy has been established by the meet and confer process. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Shift Differential. D. Longevity Pay – The City shall provide all sworn employees represented by the Association, the following longevity pay in addition to other compensation as established by the Department’s Sworn Personnel Seniority List: 1. Five percent (5%) of the base hourly rate of pay at 10 years of qualified sworn law enforcement experience. 2. Effective June 24, 2023, fifteen percent (15%) of the base hourly rate of pay at 20 years of qualified sworn law enforcement experience. This pay is in lieu of the pay identified in sub-section 1 above. 3. Effective June 24, 2023, five percent (5%) of the base hourly rate of pay at 20 years for non-sworn employees who have worked for the City of Huntington Beach for twenty (20) years or more or worked in the same job classification (even if some of the time was with another law enforcement agency) for twenty (20) years or more. Only sworn law enforcement experience as defined by California Penal Code Sections 830.1 and 830.2 or the out-of-state equivalent as determined by the Chief of Police shall be included as qualified sworn law enforcement experience in the calculation of longevity. 286 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 17 The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1) and Section 571.1(b)(1) Longevity Pay. E. Retention Pay – Non-sworn employees in the bargaining unit with at least twenty (20) years of experience working in a law enforcement department who do not qualify for Longevity Pay in Subsection D above (either because they have not worked for the City or in the same classification for twenty (20) years or more), shall receive Retention pay at five percent (5%) of the base hourly rate. If the employee subsequently qualifies for Longevity Pay as defined in Subsection I above, they shall no longer qualify for Retention Pay. Retention Pay is not pensionable and will not be reported to CalPERS. F. Effective Date of Special Pays – All special pay in this Article VII shall be effective the first full pay period following certification (if applicable) and verification as approved by the Chief of Police or designee. All special pays shall be included as part of the regular rate of pay for the purposes of calculating overtime. All pays not in this section are not considered special pays and are not included in the regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating overtime, except On -Call Court Time (Article IX(B)(3)(b)) and Cancelled Subpoenas (Article IX(B)(3)(c)) which shall be calculated into the regular rate of pay at base hourly rate. G. No Pyramiding/Compounding of Special Pay – Each special pay is a percentage of that employee’s base hourly rate of pay and shall not be counted towards the value of any other special pay. ARTICLE VIII- UNIFORMS, CLOTHING, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A. Uniforms 1. The City shall continue the Uniform Allowance in lieu of the City providing uniforms for employees represented by the Association. Such allowance shall be thirteen hundred dollars ($1,300) for sworn employees and twelve hundred dollars ($1,200) for non-sworn employees per year. The Uniform Allowance for all employees shall be paid with the first paycheck in December. Employees hired after January 1st shall have their uniform allowance pro-rated for each month in which they were on active duty for at least one full shift. It is the mutual intent of the parties that this allowance shall be utilized solely for the purpose of replacing, repairing and maintaining uniforms and clothing worn in the line of duty. The City will continue to make initial issuance of required uniforms and replace uniforms and equipment 287 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 18 damaged in the line of duty including safety equipment required by state law, City resolution or ordinance, or by order of the Chief of Police. 2. PERS Reporting of Uniform Allowance – The City shall report to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) the uniform allowance for each sworn and civilian classification as special compensation in accordance with Title 2, California Code of Regulation, Section 571(a)(5). Notwithstanding the previous sentence, for “new members” as defined by the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the uniform allowance will not be reported as compensation earnable to CalPERS. B. Special Assignment Uniform Needs – Uniforms and equipment for special assignments shall continue to be provided by the City. C. Motorcycle Britches – Motorcycle officers shall receive four pairs of britches at the time of assignment. After initial issue, replacement britches may be issued on the recommendation of the Traffic Bureau Commander with approval of the Department Head. All replaced britches must be turned in when replacement britches are received. ARTICLE IX – HOURS OF WORK/OVERTIME A. Work Schedule: 1. The work schedule agreed to by the City and the Association shall be set forth herein unless the Association and the City mutually agree to changes. All employees are subject to be called to work any time to meet any and all emergencies or unusual conditions which, in the opinion of the City Manager, Chief of Police or designee, may require such service from any of the employees. a. All work schedules are designed to be in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). b. Meal times are included in all work schedules for all classifications represented by the bargaining unit. 2. 4/10 Schedule – All employees not assigned a different work schedule pursuant to this article shall work a 4/10 schedule consisting of four (4) consecutive ten (10) hour days followed by three (3) consecutive days off in a seven (7) day period. All employees work an eighty (80) hour work period, except for Communication Employees who work a forty (40) hour work week. 288 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 19 3. 7/11.5 Schedule – The “7/11.5” work schedule applies to designated employees of the Patrol Division and Administrative Operations Division and Jail. a. Workday – A workday for employees assigned to the 7/11.5 work schedule will consist of 11 hours and 25 minutes of work. b. Eighty (80) Hour Work Period – For those sworn and detention employees working 11 hours and 25 minutes a day, the work period will consist of two (2) consecutive weeks with three (3) consecutive shifts of 11 hours and 25 minutes in one week and four (4) consecutive shifts of 11 hours and 25 minutes in the second week. The total hours for these two consecutive weeks shall be considered equal to (80) hours. The two-week cycle then repeats itself. These employees are subject to a 14 day FLSA work period in accordance with Section 7(k) of the FLSA. c. Exceptions – At the discretion of the Chief of Police, specialized assignments within the Uniform Division will work either the 4/10 or 7/11.5 as described above. Unless agreed upon by the Association, changes to these work shifts shall only be made during recruitment of new officers into the assignments. Task Force assignments outside the Police Department will be flexible based on an eighty (80) work period. d. Beach Schedule – If posted during recruitment, employees working the Beach detail shall be assigned a fixed schedule that incorporates a work week of four consecutive days comprised of two (2) 8-hour days and two (2) 12-hour days. e. Schedule – Employees assigned to training or a school in excess of thirty -two (32) hours in a work week will work five (5) day, eight (8) hour work week in lieu of their regular work schedule. 4. 3/12 or 3/12.5 Work Schedules – The following work schedules may be assigned: a. 3/12 Work Schedule – This is three 12-hour consecutive days with a fixed 8- hour day every other week. The FLSA workweek begins exactly four hours after the start time of the employees 8-hour day. b. 3/12.5 + 5 Work Schedule – Employees are scheduled to work three 12.5 hour shifts (on consecutive days) each week, with one additional five hour shift each 14 days that is adjacent to the employee’s first or last regularly scheduled shift of the week. These employees’ FLSA workweeks shall begin exactly 168 hours later. 289 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 20 c. 3/12.5 Work Schedule – This work schedule is only available for sworn employees. The 3/12.5 schedule shall consist of three consecutive 12.5 hour shifts each week, with one additional 10-hour shift each 28 days that is prescheduled prior to shift bid by the unit supervisor. 5. Work Week Communications Center Employees in the classifications of Police Communications Operator and Police Communications Supervisor shall work a 4/10 schedule, which consists of four (4) consecutive work days of ten (10) consecutive hours each, followed by three (3) consecutive days off. Each 10-hour shift shall be inclusive of a paid meal period and breaks. Upon agreement of the Association and the Chief of Police, communications center employees may be assigned to any of the other work schedules set forth above. 6. 6. Overtime a. Employees assigned to an eighty (80) hour work period shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1 ½) times their regular rate of pay for all time worked in excess of their regularly scheduled shift and/or 80-hour work period. Their 80- hour work period is authorized and in accordance with Section 7(k) of the FLSA. b. Employees assigned to a forty (40) hour work week shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1 ½) times their regular rate of pay for all time worked in excess of their regularly scheduled shift and/or forty (40) hour work week. However, Communication Operators on the 7/11.5 or 3/12.5+5 work schedule must work a minimum of forty (40) hours in the work week before earning overtime. Any hours worked in excess of the regularly scheduled shift that do not exceed forty (40) hours in a work week shall be paid at their regular rate of pay. c. As the City improves its existing Human Resources and Payroll systems to have more automated functionality, it will work toward enabling employees to be able to assign overtime pay to deferred compensation without incurring additional significant implementation costs or staff time. These efforts would occur in conjunction with normal software updates. 290 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 21 7. 7. Motors: Employees assigned as motor officers in the Special Operations Division, Traffic Bureau, shall be assigned to either a 3/12.5 or 4/10 schedule. Employees shall bid their shifts according to seniority as a motor officer. Those working the 4/10 schedule shall be assigned to work Monday through Thursday. Those assigned to the 3/12.5 shall work Friday through Sunday. The 3/12.5 schedule shall consist of three consecutive 12.5 -hour shifts each week, with one additional 10-hour shift each 28 days that is prescheduled prior to shift bid by the unit supervisor. The three existing motor officers as of the execution of this MOU (Employee ID #’s 27021, 25785, and 70771) are grandfathered into the existing 7/11.5 schedule, including their assigned work days, and are exempt from work schedule bidding. B. Other Time: 1. Compensatory Time Off – Federal law controls the use of compensatory time off. Title 29 U.S. Code Section 207(o) allows the employer and employee representative to establish a compensatory time off bank in lieu of a cash overtime payment as required by the FLSA. The parties agree that an employee may elect to bank compensatory time up to a maximum one hundred sixty (160) hours. The employee’s right to use compensatory time off may be restricted if a request to use is not made by providing reasonable notice or the requested use is “unduly” disruptive. The parties agree reasonable notice is seventy-two (72) hours. If compensatory time off is requested with 72 hours or more notice, its use cannot be denied unless to do so would be unduly disruptive. A request to use compensatory time off made with less than the 72 hours’ notice can still be granted at the discretion of the manager to whom the request is made. In addition to the preceding, the Chief of Police shall identify days or events on which compensatory time can be denied. These days or events will be designated as “unduly disruptive days”. There shall be a maximum of seven (7) unduly disruptive days per calendar year. The Chief of Police shall identify these “unduly disruptive days” as early as possible, and no later than 45 days prior to the designated date or event. Employees who already had been granted time off with pay for the “unduly disruptive days” selected by the Chief of Police prior to the time the selection had been made shall be allowed to continue to take that time off with pay. The Modified Maximum Deployment Calendar currently being used will be eliminated and shall be replaced by the designated “unduly disruptive days”. The parties agree that if by June 30, 2026, they have been unable to agree upon a successor MOU, the compensatory time off provisions will continue unless either 291 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 22 party informs the other that it no longer agrees to allow the continued accrual of compensatory time off in lieu of overtime compensation. If that occurs, thirty (30) days after providing such notice to either side, all overtime worked will be paid unless and until the parties agree upon a subsequent compensatory time off provision in the MOU. The parties agree that the use of compensatory time off at the following times will be unduly disruptive: a. At any time when the request for compensatory time off request presents an officer’s safety problem by going below shift minimum as presented by the City in the meet and confer process. b. The Association, its officers, agents, representatives and/or members agree that during the term of this MOU they will not call, engage in, request or condone the use of compensatory time off for any strike, walkout, work stoppage, job action, slowdown, sick-out, blue flu, withholding of services or other interference with City operations, or honor any job action by any other employee of the City, employee organizations, or employees of any other employers by withholding or refusing to perform services. In the event that the Association, its officers, agents, representatives, and/or members engage in any of the conduct prohibited herein above, the compensatory time off provision of this MOU shall sunset and thereafter overtime hours shall be compensated at the employee's overtime rate. c. To the extent that these provisions are inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement in HBPOA, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. Case No. CV 92-6265 CMB (Shx) said settlement agreement is superseded. Provisions not so superseded shall not be affected by the agreement. 2. Work Time – For the purpose of computing the 80 hour work week period for sworn employees in the unit and the 40 hour workweek for non-sworn employees in the unit, the following shall be included as hours worked in determining the eligibility for overtime pay. a. Sick leave. b. Vacation and General Leave time taken during the work period. c. Compensatory time off taken during the work period. d. Any other paid leave time taken during the work period. 292 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 23 3. Subpoena Compensation a. Court Appearance Time – Employees required to appear in court during other than their scheduled working hours shall be paid a minimum of three (3) hours overtime pay; provided, however, that if such time overlaps with the employee’s scheduled working hours, said rate shall be limited to those hours occurring prior to or after the employee’s scheduled work time. For example, if an employee who is required to appear at court at 9:00 a.m. on a day their shift begins at 10:00 a.m., the employee would receive overtime pay for the h our between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. However, if that same employee was not scheduled to work that day, they would receive a minimum of three (3) hours of overtime pay. The City shall recognize administrative subpoenas the same as criminal and civil, including subpoenaed hearings conducted by telephone. Telephone Business under subpoena is differentiated from Telephonic Work as described in Section 6 below. b. On-Call Court Time- Employees required to be on-call for a court appearance during other than their scheduled working hours shall be paid a minimum of three (3) hours pay at their regular rate of pay for each morning and afternoon court session provided, however, that if such time overlaps with the employee’s scheduled working hours, said rate shall be limited to those hours occurring prior to or after the employee’s scheduled work time. For example, if an employee who is required to appear at court at 9:00 a.m. on a day th eir shift begins at 10:00 a.m., the employee would receive their regular rate of pay for the hour between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. However, if that same employee was not scheduled to work that day, they would receive a minimum of three (3) hours at their regular rate of pay. On-Call Court Time shall not be considered hours worked for the purpose of calculating overtime. Employees shall not be paid On-Call Court Time if Court Appearance Time is paid. c. Cancelled Subpoenas – Employees shall be paid two (2) hours of pay at their regular rate of pay when a subpoena for off -duty testimony is cancelled with less than twenty-four (24) hours’ notice. d. Retiree – In accordance with department policy, if the City accepts a subpoena on behalf of a current employee who then retires or a retiree, a stipend will be provided for court appearance time. The stipend will be based on the present Step E of the base hourly rate of pay of the position the retiree held before 293 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 24 retirement from City service. Paid court preparation time and travel expenses shall be mutually agreed upon between the City and the retiree. 4. Standby Pay – An employee who is placed on standby status by a supervisor shall be paid four (4) hours pay at their base hourly rate of pay for each twenty -four (24) hour period, or any part thereof, of standby status. a. Employees on standby must respond to the initial request notification as soon as possible, but in no case more than thirty (30) minutes. Methods of response to the initial request may include phone call, email or text message. b. Employees on standby should be actively engaged in tasks related to the emergency situation as soon as possible, but in no case more than two (2) hours of the initial notification. c. In the event an in-person response is required to an incident, crime scene or to a police facility, arrival at the location in question should generally be within two (2) hours after acknowledgment of the request. d. Employees shall not work overtime or extra duty assignments which would cause the employee to be unavailable to respond to emergency situations during the time period the employee is assigned to standby duty. e. Employees on standby must refrain from intoxicants or other activities which might impair the employee's ability to perform assigned duties or to respond in a timely manner. f. Employees assigned to standby shall be furnished with all equipment necessary to perform standby duties, including take -home cars, City-issued cellular phones and/or computers. g. The parties have agreed that minimally there shall be five personnel assigned to standby from Friday at 4:00 p.m. to Monday at 6:00 a.m. (12 hours of standby pay). Those personnel shall include: (1) a Sergeant to supervise crimes against persons investigations, (2) two detectives assigned to investigate crimes against persons, (3) one traffic investigator, and (4) one Traffic Sergeant. h. In addition to the above, the President of the Association or one of the Board members of the Association (the particular Board member shall be determined by the Association) shall be on standby each week. Friday at 4:00 p.m. to Monday at 6:00 a.m. (12 hours of standby pay). 294 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 25 5. Call Back – Employees who are called back to work will be paid a minimum of two (2) hours pay at the overtime rate, upon arrival at the department or the incident scene until released. Should the called back employee be cancelled prior to arrival, the two (2) hour minimum shall be paid. 6. Telephonic Business – Off-duty employees shall be compensated a minimum of fifteen (15) minutes as hours worked when telephoned to conduct departmental business. Telephonic departmental business beyond fifteen (15) minutes shall be compensated in fifteen (15) minute increments (i.e., 16-30 minutes = 30 minutes of compensation, 31-45 minutes = 45 minutes of compensation and so forth). Telephonic business is not considered Call Back Time as outlined in Article IX.B.5. 7. Canine Compensation – Employees assigned to canine duty shall be paid for the off-duty care, feeding and grooming of their canine and the routine, off -duty canine- related maintenance of their canine car. The City and the Association have considered the time that canine officers typically spend on off-duty canine care, and determined it to be fifteen (15) hours per month. Employees assigned to canine duty shall be paid fifteen (15) hours per month of overtime rate of pay based on the canine care salary rate. The canine care salary rate shall be two-thirds (2/3) of the Canine Officer’s base pay rate, excluding any specialty or similar pays. In negotiating this MOU, the City requested that the Association conduct an actual inquiry of the hours which employees assigned to canine duties perform each month to ensure compliance with FLSA and in particular the case of Leever v. City of Carson City (9th Cir. 2004). The Association advised the City that the inquiry revealed that the hours to which the parties have agreed – (fifteen hours per month) accurately describes the time such employees are performing such duties each month. In addition to the fifteen (15) hours of pay per month described in the preceding paragraph, canine officers shall be paid for off -duty veterinary visits and extraordinary off-duty care, provided that, absent an emergency, the Officers shall obtain supervisor approval for such care and shall submit payroll exemption slips. Any such additional canine compensation shall be paid at their overtime rate as defined in Article IX.A.4. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(4) and Section 571.1(b)(3) Canine Officer/Animal Premium. 8. Shift Trading 295 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 26 The parties agree the provisions below are compliant with the Fair Labor Standards Act. Unit members have the right to trade shifts with their colleagues within the same classification subject to the following conditions: a. Both employees agree to the shift trade voluntarily. b. The employees trading shifts shall complete an appropriate shift trade form signed by both employees and presented to a supervisor for approval prior to the first affected shift. Supervisors will not unreasonably deny a trade. c. The employee whose shift is worked gets credit for the shift. Thus, the employee whose shift was worked will record the time as time worked on their time sheet. Payback of the traded shift will be the responsibility of the two employees who trade shifts and will not be monitored by the City. However, the parties agree shift trades will be accomplished by the employees who trade within six (6) months of the first shift traded. If an employee leaves the City having not paid back a shift, it shall be the responsibility of the two employees to work out any pay back. ARTICLE X – HEALTH AND OTHER INSURANCE BENEFITS A. Retiree Medical Trust The City authorizes the HBPOA to participate in an employee welfare medical benefit trust fund program, called the PORAC Retiree Medical Trust, with the following conditions: 1. The City shall contribute $100.00 to the Trust per month for each represented employee. Equal contributions shall be made on the first two pay periods of each month. 2. The City shall withhold $100.00 per month for each represented employee to participate in the program. The withholding could change and if it does, it shall be in an amount as designated in writing by the HBPOA. Deductions shall be taken on the first two checks of each month. Generally, participation and contributions are required for every member of the bargaining unit represented by the Association. However, this requirement will 296 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 27 not apply to an employee who is entitled to receive full retiree medical coverage due to their service in the United States military (Military Exception). 3. HBPOA shall pay all associated expenses incurred to participate in this program. 4. Upon request, the HBPOA shall provide documentation to the City as follows: a. A copy of the in-force employee medical welfare benefit trust fund program; b. A statement certifying that funds collected are for employee welfare medical benefits for HBPOA represented employees only; c. A copy of the current program document as well as any changes, amendments or written confirmation that there have been no changes to the employee medical welfare benefit trust fund program provider; d. Verification of the funds submitted to the PORAC Retiree Medical Trust, and e. A statement certifying that the submitted funds are only being utilized to provide employee welfare benefit trust funds for participating members including members of the HBPOA. 5. City shall pay the withheld funds to the PORAC Retiree Medical Trust bi-weekly. 6. All Federal and State laws regarding employee medical welfare benefit trust funds coverage shall be followed. 7. HBPOA agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless the City as well as all direct or indirect successors, officers, directors, heirs, predecessors, assigns, agents, insurers, employees, attorneys, representatives, and each of them, past and present, from and against any claims, lawsuits, penalties, interest, taxes, or liability of any kind whatsoever, which may result from the qualified employee welfare benefit trust fund program. B. Health The City shall continue to make available group medical, dental and vision benefits to all Association employees and qualified dependents. The effective date for medical, dental and vision coverage is the first of the month following date of hire. Effective the first of the month following the employee’s date of hire, any required employee payroll deduction shall begin with the first full pay period following the effective date of 297 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 28 coverage and shall continue through the end of the month in which the employee separates, unless otherwise precluded by CalPERS Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA). All employee contributions shall be deducted on a pre- tax basis. 1. CalPERS Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act The City presently contracts with CalPERS to provide medical coverage. The City is required under CalPERS PEMHCA to make a contribution to retiree medical premiums. A retiree’s right to receive a City contribution, and the City’s obligation to make payment on behalf of retirees, shall only exist as long as the City contracts with CalPERS for medical insurance. In addition, while the City is in CalPERS, its obligations to make payments on behalf of retirees shall be limited to the required statutory minimum payment. a. PEMHCA Employer Contributions The City shall contribute on behalf of each employee, the required statutory minimum payment per month for the payment of premiums for medical insurance under the PEMHCA program. As the statutory minimum is increased, the City shall make the appropriate adjustments by decreasing its flex benefits contribution accordingly as defined in the following sub-section. b. Maximum Employer Contributions Toward Flex Benefits The City’s maximum monthly employer contribution for each employee’s medical and vision insurance premiums are set forth as follows: Effective January 1, 20236 Type of Coverage Medical Premium Employee Only (“EE”) $89220.00 Employee + one dependent (“EE” + 1) $1,650794.00 Employee + two or more dependents (“EE” + 2) $2,100285.00 Effective January 1, 20242027 Type of Coverage Medical Premium Employee Only (“EE”) $859967.00 298 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 29 Employee + one dependent (“EE” + 1) $1,7281,944.00 Employee + two or more dependents (“EE” + 2) $2,2012,485.00 Effective January 1, 20258 Type of Coverage Medical Premium Employee Only (“EE”) $8921,042.00 Employee + one dependent (“EE” + 1) $1,7942,094.00 Employee + two or more dependents (“EE” + 2) $2,2852,685.00 c. The City shall also pay up to $22.76 per month for each employee for the VSP Vision Plan. The parties agree the required PEMHCA statutory minimum contribution is included in this sum stated in the sub-section above. If the employee enrolls in a plan wherein the costs exceed the City contribution, the employee is responsible for all additional premiums through pre-tax payroll deductions. 2. Dental Insurance The annual maximum benefit for the Delta Dental PPO plan is two thousand dollars ($2,000.00). The maximum monthly City contribution for dental insurance for dental insurance shall be as follows: 1) employee only (“EE”) - $57.86; 2) employee plus one dependent (“EE + 1”) - $108.02 or 3) employee plus two or more dependents (“EE + 2”) - $142.36. 3. Retiree (Annuitant) Coverage As required by the Government Code, retired employees (annuitants) shall have available the ability to participate in the PEMHCA program. The City’s requirement to provide retirees and/or annuitants medical coverage is solely governed by the Government Code requirement that requires the City to extend this benefit to retirees (annuitants). While the City is contracted with CalPERS to participate in the PEMHCA program, CalPERS shall be the sole determiner of eligibility for retiree and/or annuitant to participate in the PEMHCA program. 299 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 30 a. City Contribution (Unequal Contribution Method) for Retirees As provided by the Government Code and the CalPERS Board, and requested by the Association, the City contracted for and uses the Unequal Contribution Method to make City contributions on behalf of each retiree or annuitant. The starting year for the Unequal Contributions Method is 2004 at $1.00 per month. The City’s contribution for each annuitant shall be increased annually by five percent (5%) of the monthly contribution for employees, until such time as the contributions are equal. The Service Credit Subsidy will be re duced every January 1st by an amount equal to any required amount to be paid by the City on behalf of the retiree (annuitant). The City shall make these payments only while the City is a participant in the PEMHCA program. b. Termination of Participation in the CalPERS PEMHCA Program – Impact to Retirees The City’s requirement to provide retirees (annuitants) medical coverage is solely governed by the Government Code requirement that PEMHCA agencies extend this benefit to retirees (annuitants). If by agreement between the Association and the City or if the City elects to impose termination of its participation in the PEMHCA program, retirees (annuitants) shall no longer be eligible for City provided medical insurance. In the event that the City terminates its participation in the PEMHCA program, the retiree medical subsidy program in place in Resolution No. 2001-28 Exhibit C to the MOU shall be reinstated. The City shall make any necessary modifications to conform to the new City sponsored medical insurance plan. c. Termination Clause The City and Association may each request termination of the City’s contract with CALPERS after the announcement of State Legislation, Judicial Rulings, or a CalPERS Board Action that changes the employer’s contribution, insurance premiums or program changes to the CalPERS medical plan. The City and Association may elect to terminate its participation in the CalPERS PEMHCA program by mutual agreement through the meet and confer process between the Association and the City. 2. Medical/Vision Opt-Out 300 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 31 Employees covered by group health insurance outside of a City -provided program (evidence of which must be supplied to the Human Resources Department), may elect to discontinue City medical coverage and either direct the cash value of the City’s Contribution Cap for employee only (“EE”) medical coverage as described in Article X.B.1.(b) be deposited into their Deferred Compensation account, or any other pre-tax program offered or approved by the City, or the employee may elect to receive this amount as a taxable cash medical-opt out benefit. In order to be eligible for the opt-out payment the employee must be able to demonstrate to the City’s satisfaction that they are enrolled in a qualified employer -sponsored group health plan that provides minimum essential coverage as defined by the Affordable Care Act, (The coverage must be obtained through another source other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) and will not incur penalties under the ACA. An employee may also elect to discontinue vision coverage. The employer -paid portion of the premium paid for vision coverage will be applied toward the medical premium. 3. Section 125 Employee Plan The City shall provide an Internal Revenue Code section 125 employee plan that allows employees to use pre-tax salary to pay for regular childcare, adult dependent care and/or unreimbursed medical expenses as determined by the Internal Revenue Code. 4. Life Insurance The City will provide $50,000 term life insurance and $50,000 accidental death and dismemberment insurance without evidence of insurability other than evidence of working full time. Additional life insurance may be purchased consistent with the plan limitations, at the employee’s cost, with evidence of insurability. 5. Income Protection Plan The City authorizes the HBPOA to administer its own Long Term Disability (LTD) Program providing the following conditions are adhered to: a. The City and HBPOA agree that the City shall not provide a City sponsored LTD Program. b. HBPOA shall contract with an authorized provider for an LTD program for the employees represented by the HBPOA. 301 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 32 c. The City shall pay to HBPOA forty-one dollars ($41) per month per occupied covered position represented by HBPOA and HBPOA shall pay the cost of LTD premiums for each such covered position. d. Non-dues paying represented employees shall be covered by the LTD Policy at the same premium rate as dues paying represented employees. e. City payment to HBPOA is to be made for each represented employee per month based on the bi-weekly payroll. f. HBPOA shall pay the authorized provider for the cost of premiums and any expenses incurred for administering the program. g. The City shall provide the HBPOA with a monthly report of covered employees. h. No self-funding/self-insurance of LTD benefits is permitted under this agreement. i. Upon request, the HBPOA shall provide an annual certification of the Plan on each anniversary the Plan is in effect will include: 1) A copy of the most current audited financial statements; 2) A copy of the latest actuarial report, which should be completed by an independent “Fellow of the Society of Actuaries”; 3) A copy of the in-force LTD Program; 4) A statement certifying that premiums collected are for LTD benefits for HBPOA represented employees only; 5) A copy of the current plan document as well as any changes or amendments, or written confirmation that there have been no changes as LTD provider; 6) A copy of the “Summary Annual Report” and, upon request, a copy of the latest filed Form 5500; 7) A listing of active HBPOA claimants with all relevant data as requested by City (i.e., date of disability, etc.) including the allocated reserves for each claimant; 8) Verification of the premium received and credited by the HBPOA. 302 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 33 9) A statement certifying that the submitted premiums are only being utilized to provide LTD benefits for participating members including members of the HBPOA; and 10) A written confirmation from the plan administrator confirming (i) that it is authorized to do business in California; (ii) that it is properly licensed; (iii) that it maintains current “Errors and Omissions” insurance; and (iv) that it is bonded. j. All Federal and State laws regarding LTD benefit coverage shall be followed. k. HBPOA agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless the City as well as all direct or indirect successors, officers, directors, heirs, predecessors, assigns, agents, insurers, employees, attorneys, representatives, and each of them, past and present, from and against any claims, lawsuits, penalties, interest, taxes, or liability of any kind whatsoever, which may result from the HBPOA sponsored and administered LTD insurance program. 6. Long Term Care a. The City authorizes the HBPOA to administer its own Long Term Care (LTC) Program providing the following conditions are adhered to: b. HBPOA shall contract with an authorized provider for LTC program for the employees represented by the HBPOA. c. The City shall pay to HBPOA for the cost of LTC premiums not to exceed twenty-five dollars ($25) per month per occupied covered position represented by HBPOA. d. Non-dues paying represented employees shall be covered by the LTC Program at the same premium rate as dues paying represented employees. e. City payment to HBPOA is to be made for each represented employee per month based on the bi-weekly payroll. f. HBPOA shall pay the authorized provider for the cost of premiums and any expenses incurred for administering the program. g. The City shall provide the HBPOA with a monthly report of covered employees 303 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 34 h. No self-funding/self-insurance of LTC benefits is permitted under this agreement. i. Upon request, the HBPOA shall provide any reasonable documentation to the City as similarly described in the LTD Program. j. All Federal and State laws regarding LTC benefit coverage shall be followed. k. HBPOA agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless the City as well as all direct or indirect successors, officers, directors, heirs, predecessors, assigns, agents, insurers, employees, attorneys, representatives, and each of them, past and present, from and against any claims, lawsuits, penalties, interest, taxes, or liability of any kind whatsoever, which may result from the HBPOA sponsored and administered LTC Program. ARTICLE XI – RETIREMENT A. “Classic Member” Safety Employee Retirement Benefits 1. 3% @ Age 50 Plan – The City shall provide the 3% @ age 50 retirement formula set forth in California Government Code Section 21362.2 for all safety employees defined as “classic members” per the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) represented by the Association. 2. 1959 Survivors’ Benefit Level IV (California Government Code Section 21574) - Members of the City’ safety retirement plan shall be covered by the Fourth Level of the 1959 Survivor Benefit. 3. Pre-retirement Optional 2 Death Benefit (California Government Code Section 21548 – Safety Employees) 4. One-Year Final Compensation (California Government Code Section 20042) 5. “Classic Member” Safety CalPERS Member Contribution - a. All “classic members” shall pay their CalPERS member contribution of nine percent (9%) of compensation earnable. b. The City has adopted the CalPERS Resolution in accordance with IRS Code section 414(h)(2) to ensure that both the employee contribution and the City 304 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 35 pickup of the required member contribution are made on a pre-tax basis. However, ultimately, the tax status of any benefit is determined by the law. 6. Classic Member Safety CalPERS Cost Sharing: a. Classic Member safety members shall cost share four percent (4%) compensation earnable in accordance with Government Code section 20516(f). B. “Classic Member” Miscellaneous Employee Retirement Benefits: 1. 2.5% @ Age 55 Plan (California Government Code Section 21354.4) – Members of the City’s miscellaneous retirement plan with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) shall receive the 2.5% at age 55 CalPERS retirement plan. 2. 1959 Survivors’ Benefit Level IV (California Government Code Section 21574) – Members of the City’s miscellaneous retirement plan shall be covered by the Fourth Level of the 1959 Survivor Benefit. 3. Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit (California Government Code Section 21548) – Members of the City’s miscellaneous retirement plan shall be covered by the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit. 4. One-Year Final Compensation (California Government Code Section 20042) 5. Classic Miscellaneous CalPERS Member Contribution - a. All “classic members” shall pay their CalPERS member contribution of eight percent (8%) of compensation earnable. b. The City has adopted the CalPERS Resolution in accordance with IRS Code section 414(h)(2) to ensure that both the employee contribution and the City pickup of the required member contribution are made on a pre-tax basis. However, ultimately, the tax status of any benefit is determined by the law. 6. Classic Member Miscellaneous CalPERS Cost Sharing: Classic member miscellaneous members shall cost share one percent (1%) compensation earnable in accordance with Government Code section 20516(f). C. Retirement Benefits for Safety and Miscellaneous Employees – Self-Funded Supplemental Retirement Benefit – In the event a PERS member elects Option #1, #, 305 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 36 #2,#3, #3W or #4 of the Public Employee’s Retirement Law, and the member is a unit employee who was hired prior to July 6, 1998, the City shall pay the difference between such elected option and the unmodified allowance which the member would have received for their life alone as provided in California Government Code sections 21455, 21456, 21457, and 21548 as said referenced Government Code sections exist as of the date of this agreement. This payment shall be made only to the member, shall be payable to the City during the life of the member, and upon that member's death, the City’s obligation shall cease. The method of funding this benefit shall be at the sole discretion of the City. All unit employees hired after July 6, 1998 shall not be eligible for this benefit. D. CalPERS “New Member” Retirement Benefits: For “New Members within the meaning of the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) of 2013 as defined in California Government Code Section 7522.04(f). Employees (both sworn and miscellaneous) shall pay one half of the normal cost rate, as established by CalPERS each year in its annual valuation for the City, as required by California Government Code Section 7522.30(c). E. “New Member” Safety Retirement Benefits 1. CalPERS “New Member” Safety Retirement Formula: 2.7% @ Age 57 Plan – The City shall provide the 2.7% @ 57 retirement formula set forth in California Government Code Section 7522.25(d) for all safety employees defined as “new members” per the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) represented by the Association. 2. 1959 Survivors’ Benefit Level IV (California Government Code Section 21574) – Members of the City’s safety retirement plan shall be covered by the Fourth Level of the 1959 Survivor Benefit. 3. Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit (California Government Code Section 21548) – These members of the City’s safety retirement plan shall be covered by the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit. 4. Final Compensation – Final compensation will be based on the highest annual average pensionable compensation during the 36 consecutive months immediately preceding the effective date of their retirement, or some other 36 consecutive month period designated by the member, as required by California Government Code Section 7522.32(a). 306 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 37 5. New Member Safety CalPERS Cost Sharing: New member safety members shall cost share an amount that when added to the one half of the normal cost rate (as established by CalPERS each year in its annual valuation for the City) shall result in the employee’s total pension contribution being 13% pensionable compensation. For example, if the one half of the normal cost rate is 11.75%, these members will cost share 1.25% pensionable compensation in accordance with Government Code section 20516(f). If in future fiscal years, the required CalPERS member contribution rate for new member safety members is 13% or more, there shall be no cost sharing during that fiscal year and employees will only pay the one half of the normal cost rate. Similarly, if the member contribution rate (one half of the normal co st) is reduced from the prior fiscal year to below 13%, these members will cost share a percentage that when added to the normal cost rate will equal 13% pensionable compensation. F. “New Member” Miscellaneous Retirement Benefits 1. CalPERS “New Member” Miscellaneous Retirement Formula: 2% @ age 62 Plan – The City shall provide the 2% @ Age 62 retirement formula set forth in California Government Code Section 7522.20(a) for all non-safety employees defined as “new members” per the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) represented by the Association. 2. 1959 Survivors’ Benefit Level IV (California Government Code Section 21574) – Members of the City’s miscellaneous retirement plan shall be covered by the Fourth Level of the 1959 Survivor Benefit. 3. Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit (California Government Code Section 21548) – These members of the City’s miscellaneous retirement plan shall be covered by the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit. 4. Final Compensation – Final compensation will be based on the highest annual average pensionable compensation during the 36 consecutive months immediately preceding the effective date of their retirement, or some other 36 consecutive month period designated by the member, as required by California Government Code Section 7522.32(a). 5. New Member Miscellaneous CalPERS Cost Sharing: Effective the beginning of the pay period including January 1, 2021, New member miscellaneous members shall cost share an amount that when added to the one 307 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 38 half of the normal cost rate (as established by CalPERS each fiscal year in its annual valuation for the City) shall result in the employee’s total pension contribution being 9% pensionable compensation. For example, if the one half of the normal cost rate is 6.75%, these members will cost share 2.25% pensionable compensation in accordance with Government Code Section 20516(f). If in future fiscal years, the required CalPERS member contribution rate for new member miscellaneous members is 9% or more, there shall be no cost sharing during that fiscal year and employees will only pay the one half of the normal cost rate. Similarly, if the member contribution rate (one half of the normal cost) is reduced from the prior fiscal year to below 9%, these members will cost share a percentage that when added to the normal cost rate will equal 9% pensionable compensation. ARTICLE XII- LEAVE BENEFITS A. General Leave The provisions on General Leave are set forth below. They went into effect on April 18, 2020. Prior to the effective date of General Leave, members of the Association earned vacation leave, as set forth in the prior MOU. Members’ accrued vacation leave balances carried over past the effective date of General Leave. Although members no longer earn vacation, they may use their accrued vacation leave and shall be cashed out of any vacation balances at separation as provided in this Section XII(A) (5), (6), (7) & (8), below. 1. Purpose – The purpose of annual General Leave is to provide a rest period, which will enable each employee to return to work physically and mentally refreshed, as well as for an illness or injury of the employee not otherwise covered under other provisions of law (e.g., Labor Code 4850, workers' compensation laws, etc.) 2. Anniversary Date – For the purpose of computing General Leave, an employee’s anniversary date shall be the most recent date on which they commenced full-time employment, unless otherwise provided in writing by agreement between the City and the employee upon initial hire or re-hire. 3. Annual General Leave Eligibility – All employees shall be entitled to use annual General Leave with pay except the following: a. Employees who have not completed six (6) months of continuous service with the City. However, employees with less than six (6) months of continuous service may, after 90 days, use up to 24 hours of General Leave for the purpose of an injury to or illness of themselves. 308 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 39 b. Employees who work less than full-time who are not permanent. However, employees who do not work full-time and are not permanent may, after 90 days, use up to 24 hours of General Leave for the purpose of illness, injury, or family sickness. c. Employees on leave of absence. 4. General Leave Accrual – Employees in the City’s service, having an average work week of forty (40) hours, shall accrue annual General Leave with pay in accordance with the following: a. For the first (1st) through the fourth (4th) year of continuous service, General Leave shall be accrued at the rate of one hundred and seventy six (176) hours per year (6.77 hours biweekly). b. For the fifth (5th) and through the ninth (9th) year of continuous service, General Leave shall be accrued at the rate of two hundred (200) hours per year (7.69 hours biweekly). c. For the tenth (10th) year and through the fourteenth (14th) year of continuous service, General Leave shall be accrued at the rate of two hundred and twenty four (224) hours per year (8.62 hours biweekly) d. For the fifteenth (15th) year and thereafter of continuous service, General Leave shall be accrued at the rate of two hundred and fifty six (256) hours per year (9.85 hours biweekly). In computing eligibility for continuous service, for sworn law enforcement members of the unit, it shall include sworn law enforcement service at another law enforcement agency. For non-sworn members of the unit, it shall include time both sworn law enforcement service at another agency as well as time in the same non- sworn classification in which they are serving in Huntington Beach. 5. Use of General Leave (or Previously Accrued Vacation Leave) a. No employee shall be permitted to use General Leave in excess of actual time earned and General Leave shall not be accrued in excess of six hundred and forty (640) hours. General Leave use for vacations (as well as any previously accrued Vacation Leave) shall be taken only with permission of the Chief of Police (or their designee); however, the Chief of Police shall schedule all vacations with due consideration for the wishes of the employee and particular 309 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 40 regard for the needs of the department. If used as sick leave, employees must call in prior to their shift and provide a supervisor with notice that they are using General Leave due to illness or injury. b. If an employee provides at least eight (8) days’ notice of a request to use General Leave, it will be granted, unless within the discretion of the Police Chief or their designee, the decision to grant the leave would create an operational burden. It is not an operational burden simply because another employee must work the shift on overtime. c. General Leave accumulated in excess of the six hundred and forty (640) hour cap shall be paid at the base hourly rate of pay on the first payday following such accumulation. 6. General Leave (or Previously Accrued Vacation Leave) Pay at Separation for Employees Exempt from the Retirement Medical Trust – Upon separation of employment, employees exempt from the Retirement Medical Trust shall be paid for unused General Leave (or previously accrued Vacation Leave) at their current regular rate of pay for all unused, earned General Leave (or previously accrued Vacation Leave) to which they are entitled up to and including the last day of employment. 7. General Leave Conversion to Cash – On or before the beginning of the pay period which includes December 15 of each calendar year, an employee may make an irrevocable election to cash out up to one hundred and twenty (120) hours of accrued General Leave which will be earned in the following calendar year at the employee’s regular rate of pay. The employee can elect to receive up to sixty (60) hours of General Leave cash out in the pay period that includes July 15. The employee shall receive any remaining General Leave cash out to which they irrevocably elected to cash out in the pay period that includes December 1. However, if the employee’s General Leave balance is less than the amount the employee elected to cash out (in the prior calendar year) the employee will receive cash for the amount of leave the employee has accrued at the time of the cash out. 8. Deferred Compensation / General Leave (or Previously Accrued Vacation Leave) Cash Out – The value of any accrued unused earned General Leave (or previously accrued Vacation Leave) may be transferred to deferred compensation (up to the maximum permitted by law) at the regular rate of pay annually or in connection with separation from employment. The employee must request the transfer no later than the end of the pay period prior to the employee's last day of employment. 310 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 41 Any unused earned General Leave (or previously accrued Vacation Leave) remaining upon separation for employees who participate in the Retiree Medical Trust will be transferred to the qualified medical retirement trust program on a pre- tax basis. 9. Financial Hardship – An employee may cash out accrued, unused vacation or general leave if they have an “unforeseen emergency” (defined as an unanticipated emergency that would result in severe financial hardship to the employee if early withdrawal were not permitted). A d etermination as to whether an “unforeseen emergency” exists shall be determined by the City at its discretion and is not subject to the filing of a grievance. B. Sick Leave – Full-time employees hired on or before April 18, 2020 received a one- time Sick Leave bank totaling 144 hours. Up to 72 hours of this Sick Leave may be used for family Sick Leave per the relationships included in Labor code section 233. Once this sick leave bank is fully used, employees will no longer receive Sick Leave, only General Leave as described above in Section XII.A (General Leave). The one-time bank may not be cashed out at any time, nor, upon separation from employment, transferred to deferred compensation, and/or a qualified medical retirement trust program. C. Holidays 1. Holiday In-Lieu Pay – Employees represented by the Association and actively employed by the City, in addition to other compensation, shall be paid each biweekly payroll one twenty-sixth (1/26) of the total one hundred and twenty (120) holiday hours earned for the year. 2. Holidays Worked – Employees who are required to work on a recognized City holiday shall receive Holiday Pay in addition to the Holiday In -Lieu Pay set forth above equal to fifty percent (50%) of their regular rate of pay for all time actually worked from 12:00 a.m. through 11:59 p.m. on the recognized holiday. The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, the compensation in this section is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(5) and Section 571.1(b)(4) Holiday Pay. 3. Holidays – The following are the City recognized paid holidays under this MOU: a. New Year’s Day (January 1) b. Martin Luther King’s Birthday (third Monday in January) c. Presidents’ Day (third Monday in February) 311 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 42 d. Memorial Day (last Monday in May) e. Independence Day (July 4) f. Labor Day (first Monday in September) g. Veterans Day (November 11) h. Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November) i. Friday After Thanksgiving j. Christmas Day (December 25) D. Bereavement Leave – Employees shall be entitled to bereavement leave not to exceed three (3) working days in each instance of death in their immediate family. Immediate family is defined as father, mother, sister, brother, spouse, registered domestic partner, children, grandfather, grandmother, stepfather, stepmother, step grandfather, step grandmother, grandchildren, stepsisters, stepbrothers, mother-in- law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepchildren, or wards of which the employee is the legal guardian. E. Family and Medical Care Leave – As employees do not accrue sick leave, all employees will be allowed to use up to sixty (60) hours per calendar year for family sick leave to care for a child, parent, spouse, registered domestic partner, grandchild, grandparent, sibling or step-parent. Employees are entitled to use up to one half (1/2) of one year’s annual accrual of general leave for the relationships set forth at Labor Code section 233. Time off for a work related injury shall not run concurrently with FMLA or CFRA leave for sworn and detention employees. F. Catastrophic Leave Donation Program – Under certain conditions, employees may donate leave time to another employee in need. The program is outlined in Exhibit F. G. Nurse Employees Certification – The City shall allow licensed nurse employees time off with pay to attend courses necessary to maintain certification requirements. H. Cash Out of Compensatory Time Off – Twice each year, employees may, at their option, be paid for compensatory time off. Payment when requested under this section shall be at the employee’s regular rate of pay in effect at the time the request is made. On or before the beginning of the pay period which includes December 15 th of each calendar year, an employee may take an irrevocable election to cash out accrued compensatory time off which will be earned in the following calendar year. The employee can elect to receive cash for their accrued compensatory time off up to two times per calendar year, and in a cumulative amount not to exceed the number of 312 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 43 hours the employee irrevocably elected to cash out in the prior year. However, if the employee’s compensatory time off leave balance in the pay period containing December 15th is less than (the balance of) the total amount the employee elected to cash out (in the prior calendar year) the employee will receive cash for the amount of leave the employee has accrued at the time of the cash out. Compensatory time off which is cashed out will be paid at the employee's regular rate of pay. I. Association Business – An allowance of one thousand forty (1040) hours per year (which is increased to one thousand two hundred and twenty (1220) effective beginning in calendar year 2024) shall be established for the purpose of allowing authorized representatives of the Association to represent members of the Association in their employment relations. Such allowance may be utilized only by those persons authorized by the Board of Directors of the Association and such utilization shall be subject to the rules indicated in Exhibit B. Up to two hundred (200) hours per year of unused hours may be carried over to the subsequent year. ARTICLE XIII – CITY PERSONNEL RULES All MOU provisions that supersede the City’s Personnel Rules shall automatically be incorporated into the City’s Personnel Rules as applicable. All City Personnel Rules shall apply to Association members, however, to the extent this MOU modifies the City’s Personnel Rules, the Personnel Rules as modified will apply to Association members. ARTICLE XIV – MISCELLANEOUS A. Tuition Reimbursement – Education costs shall be paid to non-sworn employees on the basis of full refund for tuition fees, books and supplies-provided, however, that maximum reimbursement shall be at the rates currently in effect in the University of California system. Upon approval of the Chief of Police and Director of Human Resources, employees may be compensated for actual cost of tuition, books (including e/books), and fees at accredited educational institutions that charge higher rates than the University of California, if it can be demonstrated by the employee that said educational institution presents the only accredited course or program within a reasonable commuting distance of the employee. Tuition reimbursement shall be limited to job related courses or approved degree objectives and require prior approval by the Chief of Police and Director of Human Resources. 313 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 44 Reimbursements shall be made when employees present proof to the Director of Human Resources that they have paid such costs and successfully completed the courses(s) with either a “C” grade or better, or a “Pass” grade in a pass/fail grading system. B. Meals and Mileage Allowance – The Parties agree to follow Policy AR 301 addressing Meal and Mileage Allowance and incorporate it by reference into this MOU. C. Weapon Vesting – Unit employees’ assigned a weapon shall be vested with ten percent (10%) ownership per year so that ten (10) years after assignment of the weapon to the employee, they shall be fully vested with ownership. Employees are responsible for paying the gun transfer fee when the weapon is transferred to them. D. Controlled Substance and Alcohol Testing – The City maintains the right to conduct a test during working hours of any employee that it reasonably suspects is under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance in the workplace, consistent with department policy. E. Take Home Vehicles/Distance to Work – Employees who take work vehicles home under this provision must reside within thirty-five (35) miles of the City limits. Those employees assigned a motorcycle who reside beyond thirty-five (35) miles of the City limits at the time of ratification of this Agreement may drive their motorcycle to and from their residence to their place of work if such travel does not exceed three hundred and fifty (350) miles per week. The following unit classification shall be allowed to take a City vehicle home under this provision: Employees assigned to the Executive Division, Administrative Division, Investigation Division and specific assignments in the Uniform Division that require a vehicle assignment as part of their duties (i.e., Canine, Motorcycle, Accident Reconstruction, Special Enforcement Bureau). Employees who take a City vehicle home are expected to be reasonable available to respond to work-related activities; however, there is no restriction of the employee’s off-duty activities implied or intended by this expectation. F. Administrative Appeal Procedure – In compliance with the Government Code, the Administrative Appeal Procedure for all public safety officers is referenced in Exhibit D of this MOU. G. Direct Deposit – All employees hired after April 1, 2006 shall be required to enroll in and maintain participation in the City’s direct deposit pay system. 314 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 45 H. Meet and Confer – During the term of this Agreement, the City retains the right to meet and confer on any specific issue related to payroll implementation and/or compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). I. Physical Fitness Program – Any physical fitness time earned under prior HBPD Policy Manual Section 208.9 can still be used, but can be denied if it will require the Department to backfill the employee requesting to use the time. J. Administrative Dispatcher Assignment 4.1. The Administrative Dispatcher assignment will be for two years. The employee in the assignment will stay in the assignment for two years from their initial date of appointment. a. Future appointees will have the chance to apply by providing interest memos prior to expiration of the assignment. The City will post a notice for two weeks informing prospective appointees that during that two-week period they may submit their interest memos. b. If no person submits an interest memo, the then current appointee can be reappointed for another one-year assignment. If that person no longer wishes to serve in the assignment, the Police Services Manager has the discretion to keep the assignment vacant or to appoint another (i.e., a different person) Police Communications Supervisor to the assignment for one year. c. If one person (different from the then current appointee) submits an interest memo, that person (not the then current appointee) will be appointed to the assignment. d. If more than one person (different from the then current appointee) submits an interest memo, there will be a selection process and the City reserves the right to select the appointee among those who submitted interest memos. 2. The Police Communications Administrative Supervisor will not be above the Police Communications Supervisor in the Organizational Chart and will be reflected as follows in the Communications 1 Manual: Police Services Manager Police Communications Supervisor Police Communications Administrative Supervisor Police Communications Operator 315 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 46 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding this __ _____ day of __________ 20236. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION By: By: _____ Travis Hopkins Sean McDonough City Manager POA President By: By: ___ _____ Eric Parra C.J. Remington Chief of Police POA Vice President By: By: ___ _____ Marissa Sur Read Parker Assistant City Manager POA Board Member By: _____ Robert Wexler Chief Negotiator 316 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 47 APPROVED AS TO FORM By: _____ Michael J. Vigliotta City Attorney 317 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 48 EXHIBIT A – SALARY SCHEDULE Non-Sworn 85.0% Increase Effective June 2420, 20236 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0846 Police Communications Operator POA280 34.6741.278 36.5843.556 38.5945.954 40.7248.492 42.9751.170 0844 Police Communications Supervisor POA281 39.6847.239 41.8549.831 44.1652.585 46.6055.490 49.1658.536 0221 Detention Officer POA221 34.5041.083 36.3943.330 38.4045.727 40.5348.265 42.7650.922 0220 Detention Officer, Nurse POA220 36.2843.189 38.2645.554 40.3748.071 42.6050.728 44.9453.514 0222 Detention Shift Supervisor POA222 39.4847.002 41.6549.594 43.9552.337 46.3755.210 48.9358.266 0225 Police Recruit POA225 30.0135.737 31.6537.681 33.4039.766 35.2341.947 37.1844.269 Sworn 58.0% Increase Effective June 240, 20236 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0223 Police Officer POA223 43.6251.937 46.0154.788 48.5457.802 51.2160.977 54.0364.336 0159 Police Sergeant POA159 55.9766.647 59.0570.308 62.3074.185 65.7578.289 69.3482.566 318 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 49 EXHIBIT A – SALARY SCHEDULE Non-Sworn 45.0% Increase Effective June 22, 2024June 19, 2027 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0846 Police Communications Operator POA280 36.4042.929 38.4145.298 40.52 47.792 42.7650.432 45.1253.217 0844 Police Communications Supervisor POA281 41.6649.129 43.9451.824 46.3754.688 48.9357.710 51.6260.877 0221 Detention Officer POA221 36.2342.726 38.2145.063 40.3247.556 42.5650.196 44.9052.959 0220 Detention Officer, Nurse POA220 38.0944.917 40.1747.376 42.3949.994 44.7352.757 47.1955.655 0222 Detention Shift Supervisor POA222 41.4548.882 43.7351.578 46.1554.430 48.6957.418 51.3860.597 0225 Police Recruit POA225 31.5137.166 33.2339.188 35.0741.357 36.9943.625 39.0446.040 Sworn 54.0% Increase Effective June 2219, 20242027 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0223 Police Officer POA223 45.8054.014 48.3156.980 50.9760.114 53.7763.416 56.7366.909 0159 Police Sergeant POA159 58.7769.313 62.0073.120 65.42 77.152 69.0481.421 72.8185.869 319 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 50 EXHIBIT A – SALARY SCHEDULE Non-Sworn 5.0% Increase Effective June 214, 20258 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0846 Police Communications Operator POA280 38.2245.075 40.3347.563 42.5550.182 44.9052.954 47.3855.878 0844 Police Communications Supervisor POA281 43.7451.585 46.1454.415 48.6957.422 51.3860.596 54.2063.921 0221 Detention Officer POA221 38.0444.862 40.1247.316 42.3449.934 44.6952.706 47.15 55.607 0220 Detention Officer, Nurse POA220 39.9947.163 42.1849.745 44.5152.494 46.9755.395 49.5558.438 0222 Detention Shift Supervisor POA222 43.5251.326 45.9254.157 48.4657.152 51.1260.289 53.9563.627 0225 Police Recruit POA225 33.0939.024 34.8941.147 36.8243.425 38.8445.806 40.9948.342 Sworn 5.0% Increase Effective June 2124, 20258 Job No Job Title Pay Grade A B C D E 0223 Police Officer POA223 48.0956.715 50.7359.829 53.5263.120 56.4666.587 59.5770.254 0159 Police Sergeant POA159 61.7172.779 65.1076.776 68.6981.010 72.4985.492 76.4590.162 320 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 51 EXHIBIT B – ASSOCIATION BANK TIME GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE ASSOCIATION BANK TIME A. Any substantial1 time used for the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association business while the member is using that time, is on a working status and this time will be deducted from the Association Bank, as per the MOU. B. Any Association member desiring to use Association time, while on duty, shall obtain permission from their immediate supervisor, then from the President of the Association. An Association member shall, on all but emergency situations, give adequate advance notice to their supervisor when requesting time off for Association business. If the employee’s absence is less than one hour, use of Association bank time is not required. If the employee is away from work in excess of one hour, an Association book-time slip for all time away from work is required. In the event that the President of the Association is not available to grant permission, the Vice-President will then have the responsibility to make the appropriate decision. If the Association member’s immediate supervisor will not grant the person who is requesting time off for Association business, then the President shall be immediately notified by the member. If the business is of such a nature that it must be conducted by that particular Association member, then the President will take the matter to the Division level and every effort will be made to resolve the issue. C. Any member using Association time, while on duty, will submit an Association Bank Time Form and an overtime request form to the President. The member must write on top of the overtime form “ASSOCIATION BANK TIME OFF” and the payroll exception form will be signed by the Supervisor and the President of the Police Officer’s Association or his representative. The Association time hours must be tracked by use of a separate payroll code so that each time it is used it is specifically accounted for on the time sheet of the employee who uses it. 1 Substantial time, being defined as that time in excess of one hour and where the Association member is not available for duty until the Association business is concluded. 321 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 52 D. Those Association members that may use the Association Bank are: 1. President of the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association. 2. Board of Directors of the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association. 3. Members assigned to committees designated by the President or the Board of Directors. 4. PORAC Representative. 5. Any other Association member designated. E. All memorandums and payroll exemption forms will be forwarded to payroll and the copies will be sent to the Secretary of the Association for accounting purposes. 322 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 53 EXHIBIT C – SERVICE CREDIT SUBSIDY SERVICE CREDIT SUBSIDY PLAN An employee who has retired from the City and meets the plan participation requirements shall receive a monthly Service Credit Subsidy as provided below if the employee incurs expenses for medical premiums or purchases medical insurance to reimburse the retiree for the payment of qualified medical expenses incurred for the purchase of medical insurance. If two retired employees are married or registered domestic partners and both were covered by this MOU at the time of retirement, each would receive a reimbursement equal to the amount of their monthly Service Credit Subsidy even if only one purchased the medical plan and the other was named as a dependent, irrespective of who was the purchaser of the medical plan. If a retired member has a spouse or registered domestic partner who has retired from another bargaining unit, that spouse or registered domestic partner is not precluded from receiving the subsidy if at the time of their retirement the MOU governing that individual authorized the subsidy. The City shall continue to treat this Subsidy as a non-taxable reimbursement unless otherwise required by the Internal Revenue Service. Plan Participation Requirements 1. At the time of retirement, the employee has a minimum of ten (10) years of continuous regular (permanent) City service or is granted an industrial disability retirement; and 2. At the time of retirement, the employee is employed by the City; and 3. Following official separation from the City, the employee is granted a retirement allowance by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). The City’s obligation to pay the Service Credit Subsidy as indicated shall be modified downward or cease during the lifetime of the retiree upon the occurrence of any one of the following: a. On the first of the month in which a retiree or dependent reaches age 65 or on the date the retiree or dependent can first apply and become eligible, automatically or voluntarily, for medical coverage under Medicare (whether or not such application is made) the City’s obligation to pay Service Credit Subsidy may be adjusted downward or eliminated. 323 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 54 b. In the event of the death of an eligible employee, whether retired or not, the amount of the Service Credit Subsidy benefit which the deceased employee was eligible for at the time of their death shall be paid to the surviving spouse or dependent for a period not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of death. 4. Minimum Eligibility for Benefits – With the exception of an industrial disability retirement, eligibility for Service Credit Subsidy begins after an employee has completed ten (10) years of continuous regular (permanent) service with the City of Huntington Beach. Said service must be continuous unless prior service is reinstated at the time of their rehire in accordance with the City’s Personnel Rules. To receive the Service Credit Subsidy retirees are required to purchase medical insurance from City sponsored plans. The City shall have the right to require any retiree (annuitant) to annually certify that the retiree is purchasing medical insurance benefits. 5. Disability Retirees – Industrial disability retirees with less than ten (10) years of service shall receive a maximum monthly payment toward the premium for health insurance of $121.00. Payments shall be in accordance with the stipulations and conditions, which exist for all retirees. 6. Service Credit Subsidy – Payment shall not exceed the dollar amount which is equal to the qualified medical expenses incurred for the purchase of City sponsored medical insurance. 7. Maximum Monthly Service Credit Subsidy Payments – All retirees, including those retired as a result of disability, whose number of years of service prior to retirement exceeds ten (10) continuous years or regular (permanent) service shall be entitled to maximum monthly Service Credit Subsidy by the City for each year of completed City service as follows: 324 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 55 Maximum Service Credit Subsidy Retirements After: Years of Service Service Credit Subsidy 10 $121 11 136 12 151 13 166 14 181 15 196 16 211 17 226 18 241 19 256 20 271 21 286 22 300 23 315 24 330 25 344 8. Medicare: a. All persons are eligible for Medicare coverage at age 65. Those with sufficient credited quarters of Social Security will receive Part A of Medicare at no cost. Those without sufficient credited quarters are still eligible for Medicare at age 65, but will have to pay for Part A of Medicare if the individual elects to take Medicare. In all cases, the participant pays for Part B of Medicare. b. When a retiree and their spouse are both 65 or over, and neither is eligible for paid Part A of Medicare, the Service Credit Subsidy shall pay for Part A for each of them or the maximum subsidy, whichever is less. c. When a retiree at age 65 is eligible for paid Part A of Medicare and their spouse is not eligible for paid Part A of Medicare, the spouse shall not receive the subsidy. When a retiree at age 65 is not eligible for paid Part A of Medicare and their spouse who is also age 65 is eligible for paid Part A of Medicare, the subsidy shall be for the retiree’s Part A only. 325 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 56 9. Cancellation: a. For retirees/dependents eligible for paid Part A of Medicare, the following cancellation provisions apply: i. Coverage for a retiree under the Service Credit Subsidy Plan will be eliminated on the first day of the month in which the retiree reaches age 65. ii. At age 65 retirees are eligible to make application for Medicare. Upon being considered “eligible to make application”, whether or not application has been made for Medicare, the Service Credit Subsidy Plan will be eliminated. 326 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 57 EXHIBIT D – ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL PROCEDURE 1. Authority a. Rule 20 of the existing City Personnel Rules provides an administrative procedure for appealing any discipline that involves a loss in pay. Rule 20 applies to all City employees. b. Government Code Section 3304(b) allows that an appeal procedure be made available to all “public safety officers” (as defined at Government Code § 3301) for the following “punitive actions as defined in Government Code section 3303”: (i) written reprimands; and (ii) transfer for purposes of punishment with no loss of pay. Such actions will be collectively referred to as an “Action”. Case law allows such an appeal procedure to be more limited than afforded under Rule 20. c. This provision is intended to establish the Administrative Arbitration Panel to hear appeals from public safety officers. This provision only applies to an “Action” as defined above in “b”. (Government Code § 3304(b)) 2. Administrative Arbitration Panel a. Appeals will be heard by a neutral fact finding group of three City employees. b. Only active full-time employees of the City of Huntington Beach Police Department may serve on the Administrative Arbitration Panel. The Panel is comprised of one employee selected by the POA, one employee selected by the – Chief of Police, and the third employee selected by mutual agreement between the first two panel members. If no agreement can be reached, the “strike-out” process will be used to select the third Panel member, with the POA and the Chief each submitting four names for consideration. A coin toss will determine the party striking first with the POA reserving the right to call the coin or defer. c. The panel member selected by the Chief of Police, the POA, and the panel member selected by the Chief of Police and the POA shall each select one alternate to the panel to serve in place of a panel member in case of conflicts of interest. 327 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 58 d. A panel member will serve one year. If the panel member selected to serve on an Administrative Arbitration Panel has direct involvement in the punitive action or is a party to the issue, they will be replaced by the alternate. 3. Appeal Notice a. An appealing officer has five (5) calendar days from date of receipt of an “Action” to file a written appeal with the Chief of Police; otherwise, the “Action” shall stand as issued with no further rights to appeal. b. If an officer chooses not to appeal an “Action”, they may submit a written rebuttal within thirty (30) days from date of receiving the “Action”. The written rebuttal will be filed with the “Action” in the officer’s official personnel file. 4. Schedule of Hearing Upon receipt of the written appeal notice, the Chief of Police is required to immediately request the Administrative Arbitration Panel to convene for a hearing. The Administrative Arbitration Panel is required to convene within thirty (30) days of receiving notice from the Chief of Police. 5. Hearing Procedure a. All hearings shall be closed to the public unless the disciplined officer requests a public hearing. b. All hearings shall be tape-recorded. c. The Administrative Arbitration Panel shall hear testimony from the appealing officer and the Department (specifically, the officer who investigated the conduct that led to the Written Reprimand). Testimony shall not exceed on e hour from each side and an additional fifteen (15) minutes shall be given to each for rebuttal. The Department shall be heard first. d. If an appealing officer wishes to submit a written argument in lieu of oral testimony, they may do so provided that they notify the opposing party. The written testimony may not exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) words. The written testimony must be submitted to the Administrative Arbitration Panel 328 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 59 and the Chief of Police by no later than three (3) days in advance of the scheduled hearing. e. There is no right to sworn testimony, subpoenas, cross-examination or representation by third parties, including attorneys, at the hearing. f. In all “Actions” involving punitive discipline, the burden of proof shall be on the Department to show by a preponderance of the evidence that just cause exists for imposing discipline. In all non-punitive “Actions” (e.g., a non-punitive transfer that results in a loss of pay), the burden of proof shall be on the Department to show by a preponderance of the evidence that reasonable grounds exist for the transfer. 6. Rendering of Decision by the Administrative Arbitration Panel a. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Administrative Arbitration Panel shall deliberate in closed session. b. The decision of the Administrative Arbitration Panel is binding with no further rights to appeal. c. The decision of the Administrative Arbitration Panel must be issued in writing to the appealing officer within seven (7) calendar days from the conclusion of the hearing. d. The member of the Administrative Arbitration Panel who was selected by the POA and the Chief of Police shall be responsible for preparing and distributing the decision with a copy to both parties. e. The decision shall include the following: ➢ Sustained (“Action” stands) ➢ Not Sustained (“Action” does not stand) ➢ Other Recommendation(s) to the Chief of Police f. In the event an officer’s “Action” is Sustained, they may, within five (5) calendar days from the date of the Administrative Arbitration Panel’s decision, file a written rebuttal. The written rebuttal will be filed with the “Action” in the employee's official personnel file, along with the tape recording of the hearing. 329 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 60 EXHIBIT E – VOLUNTARY CATASTROPHIC LEAVE DONATION VOLUNTARY CATASTROPHIC LEAVE DONATION Guidelines 1. Purpose The purpose of the voluntary catastrophic leave donation program is to bridge employees who have been approved leave time to either: return to work, long-term disability, or medical retirement. Permanent employees who accrue vacation, general leave or compensatory time may donate such leave to another permanent employee when a catastrophic illness or injury befalls that employee or because the employee is needed to care for a seriously ill family member. The leave - sharing Leave Donation Program is Citywide across all d epartments and is intended to provide an additional benefit. Nothing in this program is intended to change current policy and practice for use and/or accrual of vacation, general, or sick leave. 2. Definitions Catastrophic Illness or Injury – A serious debilitating illness or injury which incapacitates the employee or an employee’s family member. Family Member – For the purposes of this policy, the definition of family member is child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, grandchild, grandparent, sibling and in-laws. 3. Eligible Leave Accrued compensatory time off, vacation or general leave hours may be donated. The minimum donation an employee may make is two (2) hours and the maximum is forty (40) hours. 4. Eligibility Permanent employees who accrue vacation or general leave may donate such hours to eligible recipients. Compensatory time off accrued may also be donated. An eligible recipient is an employee who: 330 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 61 • Accrues vacation or general leave; • Is not eligible for receiving disability benefits or Workers' Compensation payments; and • Requests donated leave. 5. Transfer of Leave The maximum donation credited to a recipient’s leave account shall be the amount necessary to ensure continuation of the employee’s regular salary during the employee's period of approved catastrophic leave. Donations will be voluntary, confidential and irrevocable. Hours donated will be converted into a dollar amount based on the hourly wage of the donor. The dollar amount will then be converted into accrued hours based on the recipient's hourly wage. An employee needing leave will complete a Leave Donation Request Form and submit it to the Department Director for approval. The Department Director will forward the form to Human Resources for processing. Human Resources, working with the department, will send out the request for leave donations. Employees wanting to make donations will submit a Leave Donation Form to the Finance Department (City payroll). All donation forms submitted to payroll will be date stamped and used in order received for each bi-weekly pay period. Multiple donations will be rotated in order to insure even use of the time from donors. Any donation form submitted that is not needed will be returned to the donor. 331 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 62 Voluntary Catastrophic Leave Donation Program Leave Request Form Requestor, Please Complete According to the provisions of the Voluntary Catastrophic Leave Donation Program, I hereby request donated vacation, general leave or compensatory time. MY SIGNATURE CERTIFIES THAT: • A leave of absence in relation to a catastrophic illness or injury has been approved by my department; and • I am not receiving disability benefits or Workers’ Compensation payments. Name: (Please Print or Type: Last, First, MI) Work Phone: Department: Job Title: Employee ID#: Requester Signature: Date: Department Director: Date: Human Resources Department Use Only End donation date will bridge to: Long Term Disability Medical Retirement beginning Length of FMLA leave ending Return to work End donation date: Human Resources Director Signature: Date signed: Please submit this form to the Human Resources Office Department for processing. 332 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 63 Voluntary Catastrophic Leave Donation Program Leave Donation Form Donor, Please Complete Donor Name: (Please Print or Type: Last, First, MI) Work Phone: Donor Job Title: Type of Accrued Leave: ☐ Vacation ☐ Compensatory Time ☐ General Leave Number of Hours I wish to donate: ________ Hours of Vacation ________ Hours of Compensatory Time ________ Hours of General Leave I understand that this voluntary donation of leave credits, once processed, is irrevocable; but if not needed, the donation will be returned to me. I also understand that this donation will remain confidential. I wish to donate my accrued vacation, comp or general leave hours to the Leave Donation Program for: Eligible recipient employee’s name (Last, First, MI): Donor Signature: Date: Please submit to Payroll in the Finance Department. 333 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 64 EXHIBIT F – JOB SHARING PROGRAM A. Definition Job Sharing: Two employees share one job, subject to the following conditions: B. Eligibility 1. Police Officers eligible for this program must have three (3) years’ experience as a patrol Officer for Huntington Beach Police. Lateral Officers with two (2) years prior patrol experience are eligible after two (2) years of patrol assignment with HBPD. Police Sergeants are not eligible for the job sharing program. 2. Police Communications Operators eligible for this program must have three (3) years’ dispatch experience as a Police Communications Operator for Huntington Beach Police. Lateral Police Communications Operators with three (3) years of prior experience are eligible after two (2) years’ experience with HBPD. Police Communications Supervisors must have three (3) years’ dispatch experience as a Police Communications Operator and/or Police Communications Supervisor for Huntington Beach Police. 3. Detention Officers are eligible after two (2) years’ experience as Detention Officers with HBPD. Detention Supervisors are eligible after two (2) years’ experience as Detention Officers and/or Detention Supervisors with HBPD. C. Benefits Job Sharing employees will: 1. Bid for one position on a patrol squad or duty position. 2. Use the seniority of the junior member of the team to establish bid shift order. 3. Receive medical coverage for employee only, or a $200 stipend upon proof of medical coverage per MOU proposal. 4. Accrue Seniority for PERS and the department on a half time basis. 5. Receive hourly pay. 6. Receive one half (1/2) uniform allowance. 7. Receive half education pay at individual rate. 8. Receive half holiday pay. 9. Receive 30 hours of Family Sick time per MOU. 10. Accrue General Leave on half time basis. 11. Earn seniority on half time basis. 334 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 65 12. Earn compensation for court appearance per MOU. 13. Receive time and one half pay for mandatory overtime. D. Conditions 1. Absent an emergency, employees seeking a return to full time assignment are required to give 90-day notice of intent. 2. In the event of an emergency separation of the sharing partner, the remaining partner will enjoy a 90-day window within the shared position before returning to full time employment. 3. The remaining partner will return to full time when the sharing partner leaves the position, unless replaced by another qualified job share employee. 4. Job sharing employees are not eligible for voluntary overtime. 5. Up to five positions would be eligible for job sharing in uniform patrol. 6. Only one position in dispatch and the jail would be eligible for job sharing. 7. Job sharing employees cannot work specialty assignments (i.e. SWAT, Beach Detail, HNT). 8. Job Sharing would be limited to a five (5) year term. Job sharing candidates leaving the position would be eligible for re-entry after one year in patrol. 335 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 66 EXHIBIT G – ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT LABOR MANAGEMENT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION This Labor Management Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach (“City”) and the Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (“HBPOA”) is created pursuant to California Labor Code Section 3201.7(a)(3)(c). Nothing in this Agreement diminishes the entitlement of an employee to compensation payments for total or partial disability, temporary disability, or medical treatment fully paid by the employer as otherwise provided in Division 4 of the Labor Code . Nothing in this Agreement denies to any employee the right to representation by counsel at all stages during the alternative dispute resolution process. Article I. Purpose The purposes of this Agreement are: 1. To provide active employees claiming compensable injuries under Division 4 of the California Labor Code (“Workers’ Compensation Law”) with an expedited procedure to resolve medical disputes in accordance with Article IV, Section D of this Agreement to facilitate their prompt return to work at either full duties or a transitional duty assignment; 2. To provide retirees claiming a presumptive injury as defined by California Labor Code (hereinafter “Labor Code”) Section 3212 et seq. with an expedited procedure to resolve medical disputes in accordance with Article IV, Section D of the Agreement; 3. To reduce the number and severity of disputes between the City and covered employees, when those disputes relate to workers' compensation; and 4. To provide workers’ compensation coverage in a way that improves labor management relations, improves organizational effectiveness, and reduces costs to the City. These purposes will be achieved by utilizing an exclusive list of medical providers to be the sole and exclusive source of medical evaluations for disputed issues surrounding covered employees in accordance with California Labor Code Section 3201.7(c). 336 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 67 Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions herein, the parties agree as follows: Article II. Term of Agreement The City and HBPOA enter into this Agreement with the understanding that the law authorizing this Agreement is new, untested and evolving. The parties further understand that this Agreement governs a pilot program and that it will become effective after i t is executed by the parties, submitted to the Administrative Director of the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' Compensation in accordance with Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 10202(d), and accepted by the Administrative Director as evidenced by the Director’s letter to the parties indicating approval of this Agreement. Any claim arising from an industrial injury sustained before the termination of this Agreement shall continue to be covered by the terms of t his Agreement, until all medical issues related to the pending claim are resolved. Any medical issue resolved under this Agreement shall be final and binding. The parties reserve the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, by mutual agreement or by act of the legislature. The terminating party must give thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. The parties agree to meet and confer in good faith to try and resolve the issues underlying the termination during the thirty day period prior to the termination of the Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, the parties shall become fully subject to the provisions of the California law to the same extent as they were prior to the implementation of this Agreement, except as otherwise specified herein. Article III. Scope of Agreement A. This Agreement applies only to injuries, as defined by Workers' Compensation Law, claims by 1) active employees; 2) retirees who claim a presumptive injury as defined by California Labor Code Section 3212 et seq.; and 3) active employees who file a claim and subsequently retire before the claim is resolved. Retirees who filed claims while they were active employees are covered under this Agreement only for the purposes of petitions to reopen a pre-existing claim unless covered under A(2). This Agreement does not apply to any other retired employees. This Agreement does not cover post-retirement amendments to active claims. B. Employees who are covered under this Agreement remain covered during the entire period of active employment. C. Injuries occurring and claims filed after termination of this Agreement are not covered by this Agreement. 337 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 68 D. This Agreement is restricted to establishing an exclusive list of medical providers to be used for medical dispute resolution for the above -covered employees in accordance with California Labor Code Section 3201.7(c). Article IV. Medical Provider A. This Agreement does not constitute a Medical Provider Network (“MPN”). Physicians who act as a covered employee’s independent medical examiner (“IME”) under this Agreement shall not act as the same employee’s treating physician even if the physician has been pre-designated as the employee’s treating physician, unless otherwise mutually agreed by the parties. Pre-designation of a physician must comply with the requirements set forth in Labor Code section 4600(d)(1). B. All employees with a disputed medical issue as described below in Section D must be evaluated by an approved physician from the exclusive list of approved medical providers. Said physician will serve as an IME. If the IME needs the opinion of a different specialist, the IME shall refer the employee to a physician of the IME’s choice even if that doctor is not on the approved list. The exclusive list of approved medical providers will be established when the Agreement has been approved by all parties. C. The exclusive lists of approved medical providers shall include the specialties as agreed upon by the parties. D. An IME shall be used for all medical disputes that arise in connection with a workers’ compensation claim including but not limited to determination of causation, the nature and extent of an injury, the nature and extent of permanent disability and apportionment, work restrictions, ability to return to work, including transitional duty, future medical care, and resolution of all disputes arising from utilization review, including need for spinal surgery pursuant to Labor Code section 4062(b). The parties will use the originally chosen IME for all subsequent disputes under this Agreement. In the event that said IME is no longer available, then the parties shall utilize the next specialist on the list pursuant to Article IV G d (below). The IME process will b egin when either party gives the other written notice of an objection. Objections from the City will be sent to the employee with a copy to the employee’s legal representative if represented and a copy to HBPOA. Objections from the employee or employee’s legal representative will be sent to the employee’s assigned Claims Examiner with a copy to the Claims Manager. Objections will be sent within thirty (30) days of receipt of a medical report or a utilization review decision. A letter delaying decision of the claim automatically creates a dispute. A subsequent acceptance of the claim and/or 338 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 69 resolution of the dispute issue eliminates the need for completion of the dispute resolution process set forth in this Agreement. E. The exclusive list of approved medical providers shall serve as the exclusive source of medical-legal evaluations as well as other disputed medical issues arising from a claimed injury. F. The parties hereby agree that from time to time the exclusive list of approved medical providers may be amended. For either party to add an IME to the exclusive list of medical providers, the party must provide notice, in writing, to the other party of its intent to add a physician to the list. Absent a written objection to the other party within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the written proposal, the addition will be made. In the event there is an objection, the physician will not be added to the list. A physician may only be deleted from the exclusion list of medical providers if they breach the terms and conditions of the contract with the City or by mutual agreement of the parties. G. Appointments. 1. The Claims section of the Workers’ Compensation Division shall make appointment(s) with the IME within ten (10) days of the date of the objection and/or notification of delay for employees covered under this Agreement. 2. The employee shall be responsible for providing the Claims staff with their work schedule prior to an appointment being made so that appointments can be made during an employee’s nonworking hours or the first or last hour of their workday. The amount of time allotted for hours spent at a physician’s appointment during working hours will be subject to verification and will be allowed accordingly. 3. Mileage reimbursement to covered employees shall be consistent with City policy and in accordance with Labor Code Section 4600 (e)(2) unless transportation is provided by the City. 4. For purposes of appointments, the claims staff will select the IME’s by starting with the first name from the exclusive list of approved medical providers within the pertinent specialty, and continuing down the list, in order, until the list is exhausted, at which time the Claims staff will resume using the first name on the list. 339 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 70 5. The City is not liable for the cost of any medical examination used to resolve the parties’ disputes governed by this Agreement where said examination is furnished by a medical provider that is not authorized by this Agreement. Medical evaluations cannot be obtained outside of this Agreement for disputes covered by this Agreement. 6. Both parties shall be bound by the opinions and recommendations of the IME selected in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. H. Industrial Disability Retirements 1. The City and HBPOA recognize that the ADR process can also be utilized to obtain a competent medical opinion as it relates to determining an employees’ eligibility for an Industrial Disability Retirement (IDR), pursuant to California Government Code Sections 21154 and 21156(a)(2). 2. Pursuant to the guidelines outlined in Article IV of this Agreement, the City and the HBPOA shall meet and confer to identify an agreed-upon listing of IMEs to serve as the competent medical examiner in reviewing an employees’ eligibility for an IDR. I. Use of IME When Medical Disputes Exist 1. An IME shall be used for all medical disputes that arise in connection with a workers’ compensation claim, including but not limited to determination of causation, the nature and extent of an injury, the nature and extent of permanent disability and apportionment, work restrictions, ability to return to work, including transitional duty, future medical care, and resolution of all disputes arising from utilization review, including need for spinal surgery pursuant to Labor Code section 4062(b). 2. Furthermore, City and HBPOA agree that IME reports will be admissible in any proceeding and/or hearing involving an injured employee. Article IV. Discovery A. Employees covered by this Agreement shall provide the Claims staff with fully executed medical, employment and financial releases and any other documents reasonably necessary for the City to resolve the employee’s claim, when requested. 340 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 71 B. The parties agree that they have met and conferred on the language of the medical/financial/employment releases to be used under this Agreement. If said releases cause undue delay and/or unforeseen adverse impact(s) to the City and/or the HBPOA and/or its members, then either party may request a meet and confer regarding said under delay and/or adverse impact(s). The parties shall meet and confer within 30 days of a party’s request to meet and confer. C. Employees shall cooperate in providing a statement. D. This Agreement does not preclude a formal deposition of the applicant or the physician when necessary. Attorney’s fees for employee depositions shall be covered by Labor Code section 5710. There will be no attorney’s fees for doctor’s depositions. Article V. General Provisions A. The Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes all other Agreements, oral or written, with respect to the subject matter in this Agreement. B. This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State of California. C. This Agreement, including all attachments and exhibits, shall not be amended, nor any provisions waived, except in writing, signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. D. If any portion of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or illegal the remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. E. Notice required under this Agreement shall be provided to the parties as follows: F. In the event that there is any legal proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this Agreement or to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees. 341 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 72 EXHIBIT H – SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT PAYCHIEF PILOT PAY SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT PAY Except as otherwise noted, employees assigned to the following assignments shall receive Special Assignment Pay of three percent (3%) and serve in these assignments pursuant to the following terms: I. Detectives: a. Existing detectives in permanent assignments shall be permitted to remain in those assignments (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. b. In each “section of the detective bureau (i.e., Crimes Against Persons, General, Economic) there shall be three designated positions (one per section) that are considered rotational positions. Those rotational positions shall be for a five (5) year term. All other detective positions shall be considered “permanent” assignments. c. As incumbent “permanent” detectives leave their positions, the first vacancy in each section shall be converted to a rotational position. All other future vacancies from permanent positions shall be filled by selections to “permanent” position. Future vacancies from rotational positions shall be filled by selections to “rotational” positions. d. When a permanent position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Detectives in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. II. Motors: a. Existing police officers assigned as Motors in permanent assignments shall be permitted to remain in those assignments (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. b. There shall be five (5) Motor positions designated as “permanent” positions. The rest of the positions in Motors are considered rotational positions. c. Rotational positions shall be for a five (5) year term. d. As incumbent “permanent” Motors leave their positions, the first five motors vacancies shall be filled by employees in rotational positions. They shall be considered “rotational” and subject to a five (5) year term. e. When a permanent position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Motors in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. 342 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 73 III. Traffic Investigator: a. There shall be one (1) traffic investigator position designated as a “permanent” position. The existing two employees assigned as traffic investigators are in a permanent assignment and shall be permitted to remain in that assignment (i.e., “grandfathered”) until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. b. The first traffic investigator position to become vacant shall be converted to a rotational position. Should additional non-motor traffic investigator positions be authorized, they shall be considered “rotational”. All rotational traffic investigator positions shall be subject to a five (5) year term. c. When a permanent traffic investigator position becomes vacant, employees shall test specifically for the permanent positions. All employees, including Traffic investigators in rotational positions, are eligible to test for permanent positions. IV. Aero Bureau: a. All Officers and Sergeants assignments in the Aero Bureau are permanent assignments. Employees shall be permitted to remain in those assignments until they voluntarily relinquished the position, promote, are removed for just cause or separate from the City. V. Canine Handlers: a. Assignments to the canine handler position shall generally be “for the life of the dog”. If the assignment is of a duration that is less than three years, due to an issue with the canine, an additional dog may be assigned and still count as one term. A canine handler may be assigned a second term as a handler, upon request and approval of the Police Chief, who has full discretion whether to approve the second term or not. VI. Regional Task Forces / Special Investigations Bureau (SIB) / Special Events Coordinator (Sergeant) / Homeless Task Force (HTF) / Training Unit / Professional Standards Unit / Special Enforcement Team (Downtown Foot Beat excluding the seasonal Beach Detail) / DUI Unit / School Resources Officer / Backgrounds Investigator / Jail Manager (1 Sgt.) / Administrative Dispatch Supervisor: a. Each of the above assignments is considered “rotational” and is subject to a five (5) year term. b. Should the City create any new special assignments, they shall be paid according to the terms of the MOU and shall be covered by the terms of this 343 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 74 provision, unless otherwise specifically agreed by the Association and the City. VII. Chief Pilot: – See separate AttachmentExhibit I to the MOU. VIII. Selection Process for Special Assignments: Employees will be selected for Special Assignments through a testing process, which will at a minimum include the following components: a. Submittal of written request for the assignment, that shows that any applicable prerequisites are satisfied. b. Written examination, which will be weighed 25% of total score. c. Oral interview, which will be weighed 75% of total score: 1. The oral interview panel will include a supervisor for desired assignment. d. A ranked eligibility list will be established based on candidates’ total score. e. The Division Commander and Police Chief shall appoint candidates to the special assignment using a “rule of five” (i.e., any candidate among the top- five scoring candidates may be selected. When a candidate is appointed, the sixth-highest scoring candidate will then move into the top-five for future appointments. f. The duration of eligible lists shall be 6 months. EXHIBIT HI – CHIEF PILOT CHIEF PILOT DUTIES The Chief Pilot is responsible for monitoring the aeronautical proficiency of all Air Support Pilots. The Chief Pilot also evaluates current and proposed flight operations, aircraft and flight training programs. The Chief Pilot reviews safety, training, maintenance and operational needs to ensure an acceptable level of standardization exists within the division. The Chief Pilot is also responsible for the following: • Conduct or facilitate an FAA flight review every 2 years as mandated by FAR 61.56. • Provide flight instruction as needed. • Establish special flight training, educational programs or FAA -mandated training for pilots. 344 POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION HBPOA MOU July 1, 20236 – June 30, 20269 75 • Evaluate all rules, policies and regulations regarding air support pilots, aircraft and operations. • Review all specialized training affecting pilots. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AND PREREQUISITE EXPERIENCE. To be eligible for the position of Chief Pilot, unit employee shall possess the following: 1) Flight Certificates a) Commercial Rotorcraft rating b) Certified Helicopter Flight Instructor rating 2) Flight Hours a) A minimum of 1000 hours as a pilot-in-command (helicopter) b) A minimum of 100 hours of helicopter flight instruction 3) Education a) A minimum of 50 hours of combined aviation education covering aviation safety, mishap management, crew resource management, flight training and aviation regulations and procedures. 4) Demonstrated leadership and communication skills. SELECTION PROCESS 1) Selection Process for Chief Pilot will include a testing process, which will, at a minimum, include the following: a) Submittal of Written Request for Assignment, demonstrating that all prerequisites are satisfied. b) Oral Interview (Panel to include the Unit Supervisor). c) Review & Assessment of work history, including input from current and former supervisors and managers (if applicable). d) Input from specialty assignment chain of command. e) Ultimately requires approval of Division Commander and Police Chief. 2) 5-year initial assignment with indefinite ability to extend in one -year increments at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police. 345 City of Huntington Beach Costing Summary POA 7-21-26 Proposed Term: 3 year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Item #Description Impact Impact Impact Proposal Ongoing Cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Notes: 1 Term: 3 year (July 1, 2026 - June 30, 2029) Salary Increases Sworn 3,719,465 2,008,511 2,611,064 8,339,040 8,339,040 8.00% 4.00% 5.00% 17.00% Non-sworn 365,981 197,630 256,919 820,530 820,530 8.00% 4.00% 5.00% 17.00% Health Insurance Single - 45,000 45,000 90,000 90,000 2-Party - 61,200 61,200 122,400 122,400 Family - 218,400 218,400 436,800 436,800 % Cost Increase 2 Total increase = 17.00% 3 Total increase = 1.26%0.63%0.63% 346 Introduction of Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with Huntington Beach Police Officers’ Association (HBPOA) City Council Meeting August 18, 2026 347 Meyers-Milias Brown Act (MMBA) • Pursuant to the MMBA, the City and HBPOA have been meeting and conferring in good faith regarding the terms of a successor MOU • A Tentative Agreement was reached in July 2026 • The Tentative Agreement and Proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is presented to the City Council to formally review and consider 348 Proposed MOU • 3-year term: July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2029 • Base salary increases: • July 1, 2026: 8% • July 1, 2027: 4% • July 1, 2028: 5% • City medical contribution increase in January 1 of years 2 and 3 of the agreement 349 Recommended Action Receive and consider the proposed MOU with HBPOA pursuant to City of Huntington Beach Ordinance No. 4154. 350 Questions? 351 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-706 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services PREPARED BY:Ashely Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services Subject: Approval of the Design and Language for the America 250 Plaque at Pier Plaza Statement of Issue: There is a need for City Council to approve the plaque design and language for the America 250 plaque at Pier Plaza as reviewed by the Community & Library Services Commission at their August 12, 2026, meeting. Financial Impact: Funding for the plaque is available in Facilities & Development Account 10045401 to cover the cost of design, production and installation of the plaque and is expected not to exceed $15,000. Recommended Action: Approve the proposed design and inscription for the America 250 Celebration plaque at the Pier Plaza Memorial. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: At the July 21, 2026, meeting, City Council approved Councilmember Item 26-638, setting aside Resolution No. 2017-25 and directed staff to create an engraving template memorializing the Huntington Beach America Semiquincentennial celebration for one of the black granite panels located at the Pier Plaza monument, with a final draft brought back to City Council for consideration at the August 18, 2026, meeting. Staff were also directed to collect input from the Historic Resources Boad and the Community & Library Services Commission. Working with Mayor McKeon and Councilmembers Burns and Kennedy (Attachment 1), the proposed plaque is 24” x 36” and includes the following: City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 2 352 File #:26-706 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 ·Huntington Beach America 250 Logo ·Placeholder for a Commemoration Date ·“Huntington Beach celebrates America’s 250th Birthday as a patriotic city, proudly honoring and thanking all those who served our great nation, who remind us that freedom is not free.” ·City Council and City Manager names ·Two cannons ·City Seal On Monday, August 10, 2026, the Historic Resources Board reviewed and provided suggested edits to the plaque (Attachment 2). On Wednesday, August 12, 2026, the Community & Library Services Commission (Commission) reviewed and provided suggested edits to the HRB iteration of the plaque (Attachment 3). All components of the first iteration of the plaque designed by Mayor McKeon and Councilmembers Burns and Kennedy are included in subsequent iterations. Suggested edits included relocating the cannons and City seal, adding decorative elements between City Council names and including more than one font to differentiate between the different sections of text. Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. City Council Item - July 21, 2026 2. Pier Plaza America 250 Plaque Rendering 3. HRB Edits Plaque Rendering City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 2 353 City Council Meeting – Council Member Items Report To: City Council From: Councilman Don Kennedy Mayor Casey McKeon Councilman Pat Burns Date: July 21 , 2026 Subject: PROPOSAL FOR INSTALLATION OF COMMEMORATIVE AMERICA SEMIQUINCENTENNIAL PLAQUE AT PIER PLAZA MONUMENT 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | www.huntingtonbeachca.gov ISSUE STATEMENT The City of Huntington Beach is Celebrating America’s 250th birthday through many events throughout the year. To properly memorialize the Huntington Beach America Semiquincentennial celebration, we propose engraving one of the black rectangles at the Pier Plaza monument. Inscription to include: The Huntington Beach America 250 Logo near the top. “Huntington Beach celebrates the historic moment of America’s 250th Birthday. A patriotic City proudly honoring and thanking all those who served our great nation, who remind us that Freedom Is Not Free” RECOMMENDED ACTION Set aside Resolution No. 2017-25 and direct staff to create the engraving template for review by Councilmembers Kennedy, Burns and McKeon, with final draft brought forward for vote on the August 18th City Council Meeting for the monument in Pier Plaza to commemorate the Huntington Beach America 250 Celebrations. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Not Applicable STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL Non Applicable - Administrative Item 354 250th Anniversary of the United States of America Commemoration Ceremony Date TBA City Manager Travis Hopkins Huntington Beach celebrates America’s 250th Birthday as a patriotic city, proudly honoring and thanking all those who have served our great nation and reminding us that Huntington Beach City Council Casey McKeon, Mayor Butch Twining, Mayor Pro Tem Pat Burns Andrew Gruel Don Kennedy Gracey Van Der Mark Chad Williams FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. 1 ”x6.5 10.75” Hb250 logo Cannons 8.75”x5.5” city logo ”x ”5 5 1.5” Letters 1” .85” -24”- 36” 355 250th Anniversary of the United States of America Commemoration Ceremony Date TBA City Manager Travis Hopkins Huntington Beach celebrates America’s 250th Birthday as a patriotic city, proudly honoring and thanking all those who have served our great nation. Huntington Beach City Council Casey McKeon, Mayor Butch Twining, Mayor Pro Tem Pat Burns Andrew Gruel Don Kennedy Gracey Van Der Mark Chad Williams FREEDOM IS NOT FREE HRB Edits356 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 File #:26-660 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY:Travis Hopkins, City Manager VIA:Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services PREPARED BY:Monica Candelario, Parking & Camping Operations Supervisor Subject: Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4350 amending Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10, Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64 and 10.68 relating to Vehicles and Traffic and Ordinance No. 4351 Chapter 13.08, Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080 relating to Beach Regulations Statement of Issue: Ordinance No. 4350 amends certain sections of Chapter 10 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code with respect to the City’s metered parking program by eliminating the requirement for individual parking meters at each parking space, removing the requirement to accept coin payments, and updating the Municipal Code to provide greater operational flexibility. Ordinance No. 4351 amends Chapter 13.08 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by clarifying definitions and permit requirements for commercial and organized activities on the beach and adjacent beach areas. Financial Impact: No funds are required to approve the proposed changes to either ordinance. Proposed changes to Ordinance No. 4350 are administrative in nature and will provide staff with the operational flexibility necessary to implement a modern parking payment system and improve operational efficiencies. Proposed changes to Ordinance No. 4351 clarify existing regulations and administrative procedures for permitting commercial and organized activities within the City's beach areas. Recommended Action: A) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4350, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64, and 10.68 of Title 10 of the City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 1 of 3 357 File #:26-660 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended actions and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: Ordinance No. 4350: The City's current Municipal Code requires that an individual parking meter be installed at each metered parking space and requires that coin payment be accepted. As parking technology has evolved, these requirements have become outdated and limit the City's ability to efficiently manage parking operations. The proposed amendments to certain sections of Chapter 10 remove the requirement for individual parking meters at every parking space, eliminate coin payment requirements, and authorize the use of mobile payment applications and strategically located multi-space pay stations as the primary methods of payment. In addition, the proposed updates will allow greater flexibility in how parking payment systems are deployed and operated. The proposed amendments would: ·Remove the requirement that every metered parking space be served by an individual parking meter. ·Eliminate coin payment as a required payment method. ·Authorize the installation and operation of multi-space pay stations in appropriate locations throughout the metered parking zone. ·Update Municipal Code language to provide greater operational flexibility and consistency. Transitioning to app-based payments with a limited number of pay stations will reduce the number of physical devices requiring maintenance, improve system reliability, and provide greater convenience for most users while continuing to accommodate customers who prefer not to use a mobile device through the availability of pay stations. Collectively, these amendments modernize the City's parking program by allowing the City to implement modern parking technologies while maintaining convenient payment options for users. The Community & Library Services Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance at its February 11, 2026, meeting and recommended City Council approve the proposed changes. Ordinance No. 4351: Separately, Chapter 13.08 regulates activities occurring on the beach and adjacent beach areas to protect public access, ensure visitor safety, preserve public resources, and provide for the orderly use of City facilities. As commercial recreation and organized activities have evolved, staff have City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 2 of 3 358 File #:26-660 MEETING DATE:8/18/2026 Environmental Status: Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project. Strategic Plan Goal: Non Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): 1. Ordinance No. 4350 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64, and 10.68 of Title 10 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Vehicle and Traffic” 2. Legislative Draft, HBMC Chapter 10 3. Ordinance No. 4351 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080 of Chapter 13.08 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Beach Regulations” 4. Legislative Draft, HBMC Chapter 13.08 5. Amending HBMC Chapter 10 & 13 Presentation City of Huntington Beach Printed on 8/13/2026Page 3 of 3 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 Amending HBMC Chapter 10 and Chapter 13 (Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64 and 10.68 & Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080) August 18, 2026 383 Background Ordinance No. 4350 amends certain sections of Chapter 10 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code with respect to the City’s metered parking program by providing the Parking & Camping Division with operational flexibility. As parking technology has evolved, the existing requirements have become outdated and limit the City's ability to efficiently manage parking operations. Ordinance No. 4351 amends Chapter 13.08 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by clarifying definitions and permit requirements for commercial and organized activities on the beach and adjacent beach areas. 384 Financial Impact •No funds are required to approve the proposed changes to either ordinance. •Proposed changes to Ordinance No. 4350 are administrative in nature and will provide staff with the flexibility necessary to implement a modern parking payment system and improve operational efficiencies. •Proposed changes to Ordinance No. 4351 clarify existing regulations and administrative procedures for permitting commercial and organized activities within the City's beach areas. 385 The proposed amendments to Chapter 10 would: •Remove the requirement that every metered parking space be served by an individual parking meter. •Eliminate coin payment as a required payment method. •Authorize the installation and operation of multi-space pay stations in appropriate locations throughout the metered parking zone. •Update Municipal Code language to provide greater operational flexibility and consistency. Ordinance No. 4350 386 Chapter 13.08 regulates activities occurring on the beach and adjacent beach areas to protect public access, ensure visitor safety, preserve public resources, and provide for the orderly use of City facilities. The proposed amendments to Chapter 13.08 would: •Expands the definition of "Facilities" to clearly include City-owned amenities such as bonfire rings, buildings, parking lots, picnic tables, barbecues, courts, and lifeguard towers. •Clarify that permits or written authorization are required for commercial services, equipment rentals, promotional activities, and organized recreational activities on the beach, adjacent beach areas, and within the Water Activity Zone. Ordinance No. 4351 387 •Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4350 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 10.04, 10.50, 10.56, 10.60, 10.64, and 10.68 of Title 10 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Vehicles and Traffic.” •Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4351 “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Sections 13.08.005 and 13.08.080 of Chapter 13.08 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Beach Regulations.” Recommended Actions 388 Questions? 389