HomeMy WebLinkAboutJAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC - 1986-08-18J
�1 CITY OF HlJiJGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
August 20, 1986
Mr. Richard A. Swart, 'ice -President
James 1". Montgomery
Consultna Engineer=:, Inc.
P.O. Box 7003
Pasadena, CA 9111)9-7009
Ceat- Mr. Swart:
Enclosed is a duly executed copy of the Engineering Services Agreement
Between the C `y of Huntington 3each and James M. Montgomery, Consulting
Engineers, INc. For Warner Avenue Sewer Pump Station.
Also enclosed is a copy o; the Certific,atH of Insurance that you submitted.
If you have any questions please call Don Noole - Department of Public
Works 536-5431.
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK
By
' Connie A. Brockway, De+)ut City Clerk
RE UE OR CITY COUNAOCTION
Date A u,- s� 1996
ibmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thoutpson, City Administrat
Prepared by: Paul E. Gook, Director of Public Works °_.,..'^-- � fir„ ....•
Subject WARNER' AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION; CC— 74?
Consistent with Council Policy? [X) Yes [ J New Policy or Exception
Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Proposals were requestedfrom qualified engineering firms to design the improvements to the
sewer force mains and sewer pump stations on the Warner Avenue facilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the selection of James M. Montgomery tj design the Warner Avenue sewer force
mains and sewer pump stations Improvements.
2. Authorize the Mayer and City Clerk to execute the attached consultant contract with
James M. Montgomery for a fee not to exceed $27,300.
ANALYSIS:
Based on a study completed by ASL Consulting engineers, the Pacific Coast Highway/Warner
Avenue Trunk Sewer System needs to be improved. The essential improvements include
upgrading existing sewer pump stations and constructing an additional sewer force main. Flans,
specifications and cost astlmates for these improvements have not been prepared and,
therefore, potrsuant to Chapter 1.03 "Professional Servicas" of the Municioal Code, requests
were solicited' from tl.e following qualified firms: ASL Consulting Engineers, UMA Engineering
Inc., Mryffat and Nichols, James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc., and Keith
Engineering Irc. Proposals were received from AS� , 'amei Montgomery, and Keith
Engineering. Staff has reviewed each of these subrzlttals and recommends that Council select
James M. Montgomery and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached
consultant contract with a fee structure not to exceed $27,300.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Revenues of $450,000 have been budgeted in fiscal account 805740 (PCH/Warner Relief Sewer)
to cover anticipated design and construction costs.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS.
1. Project Location Map
2, Consultant Contract (0
CWT:PEC,DRN:dam
1066g
P10 t;/a5
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF t UNTINGTON BEACH AND
JA, _S M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
FOR WARNER AVENUE SEWER PUMP STATION
i
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this __Lr4�� day of
F 19 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTI?tG.'ON
BEACH, a municipal. corporat on of the State of California, here-
inafter referred to as "CITY,' and JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,
CONSULTING ENGIIJEERS, INC., a California corporation, herein-
after referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the service., of an engineer-
ing consultant to design and prepare preliminary plans, final
working drawings, contract documents, specifications, cost
estimates and bid and construction period consultations for
improvement construction on the ;earner Avenue sewer pump
station, in the City of Huntington Beach; and
CONTRACTOR has been selecte-d to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed h1 CITY and CONTRACTOR as
follows:
1. WORK S'PATEMENT
CONTRACTOR .shall provide: all engineering seivices as
described in the Request for ProRosal and Statement o:
Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which
is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this
reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be
referred to as 'PROJECT."
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Richard A. Swart, who
shall represent iL and be its sore contact and agent in all
consultations with CITY during the performance of this. Agreement.
1,
.i�6�t
2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY snail ,assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the prosecution of this Agreement.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after
the execution ✓f this Agreement and all tasks specified in
Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than four (4) months
from the date of this Agreement, with an additional 14 working days
for all revisions. These times may be extended with the written
permission of the CITY. The time for performance of the tasks
identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be as shown in the
scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This
schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually
agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4� COMPENSATION
in consideration of the performance of the engineering
services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay
CONTRACTOR .a fey: not to exceed twer,ry sever thousand, three
hundred dollars ($27,300).
5 EXTRA 140RK
In the event of aull-horiiation, in writing uy the CITY,
of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A", cr for other
written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated
herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra
Work, so long as the prior written approval, of CITY is obtained.
6. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth in Section a herein in accordance
with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A°.
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every techni-
cal memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to
the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In
the event CITY r_e�ects or has comments on any such product, CITY
shall identify specific. requirements for satisfactory con.ple-
tion. Any such product which has not peen formally accepted or
rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit t+) the CITY an invoice
for each progress Payment due. Such invoice: shall:
l) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has
been performed in accordance with the provi-
sions of this Agreement; and
5) For all paymeaics include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is
sati--fiEd that CONTACTOR is making satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY
shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall
be made w:chin thirty (30) days' of receipt of the invoice by
CITY.Ouch approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the
3.
1462L
CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR
in iariting of the reasons for non -approval, within seven (7)
calendar clays of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of
performance set, forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended uz,ci.l
the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or
has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional servizes
authorized by the CITY shall be invoiced separately to the
L
CITY. Such invoice small contain all of the information
required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the
hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such
invoices shall by approved by CITY if the work performed is in
accordance with the extra work or additional services requested,
and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and
costs incurred is accurate. Stich approval shall not be unrea•-
srnably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning
payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and
H,
tir,
apart from the ongoing performance of thy: remainder of this
Agreement.
w
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMEUTS
CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR'S plans and
specifications are instruments of professional service;
nevertheless CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared
hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports,
both field and office notes, calculations, maps and oiher`
documents shall be turned over to CITY and shall become its
4.
1462
r
I
property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termination of this
Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said
materials may be used by CITY in completion of this PROJECT;
h(wever, CITY agrees to hold 'harmless, indemnify and defend
CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and losses, including
d,?fense costs, arising out of CITY''S re —use of CONTRACTOR'S
plans and specifications, except in th,-—�--letion of the
PROJECT in the case of termination Athout CONTRACTOR'S
prior written authorization.
8. INDEMNIFICATIUI , DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR; hereby agrees to defend, ind renify and hold
harmless CITY, its officers and employees from and against any
and all liability, damays.s, costs, losses, claims and expenses,
However caused, arising from, CONTRACTOR'S negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of this Agreement. Any concurrent
negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, its officers and
employees h 1 in no way diminish CONTRACTOR'S obligations
here[u��nder.`` TT''yy } )� ��yy��qrr� L *W ry 7 } �_
9. 4,.L1'.�1,ERS' i.�VMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provir ion., of
the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the Sta.e
of California, the applicaole provisions of Division 4 and 5 of
the Californip- %abor Code and all amendments thereto; and all
similar state or fe+3ieral aci-s or laws appli�aole and shall
indemnify, defend and hold t:rmless CITY from and against all
claims, demands, payments, si.its, actions, proceedings and
judgments of every riature and description, including attorney's
5.
1462L
fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against- CITY, for
or on account of any liability under any of said -. is which may
be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR
under this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the Workers' Compensation Insurance and
CGNTRACTOR'S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to CITY the toilowing insurance policies covering
the PROJECT:
A. General Liability insurance. A policy of general
public liability insurance, incl,•ding motor 'vehicle
coverage in the sun of $1,000,000 - per occurrence.
Said policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees
as Additional insureds, and shall specifically provide
that any other insurance coverage which may be
applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess
coverage and that COT1M C OR' S insurance shall be
f
primary.
f B. Professional Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall
acquire a. professional liability insurance policy
covering the work performed by it hereunder in Lull sum
of $5,000,,OOU per occurrence.
Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be
approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commence-
ment of any work hereunder. All Certificates c! Insurances (and
the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide
that any such Certificates azad policies shall not be cancelled
or reduced in coverage or limits other than payment: of claims
without. thirty (0) day,--., prior written notice to CITY.
6
1�6�L
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and sb,ll be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for
any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state
disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and
other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents
and employees and all businesst licenses, if any, in connection
with, the services to be performed hereunder.
12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in
accordance with the standards of the profession for similar
professionals performing services in this area at this time.
CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time
with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully
complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be
made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall
be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 herein.
13. ASS1GNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the
supervisory work hereunder shall not be del gated by CONTRACTOR
to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENIPS
CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent, or copyright on
any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as
set forth in '41 CPR 1-9.1.
I
7.
14.62T
FA
15. CITY EMPLOYERS AND OFFICIALS
C0NTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any
regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any
financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California
Government Code Secticns 1090 et seq.
16. NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be
given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by
personal delivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in
t' o aereinabove or to CITY' S 3)irect.,r of Public Works as
Section n 1 � ) r
the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a
I
sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the
United States Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR:
Mr. Paul Cook Mr. Richard A. Swart
Director of Publi^ Works Vice Presidenr.
City of Huntington Beach James M. Montgomery,
2000 Main Street Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Post Office Sox 7009
Pasadena, CA 91109-7009'
a
h 8`
146z"
17. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set
forth the entire Agreement between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused Lois
Aareement to be executed by and through their authorized
officers the day, month and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTlNGTON BEACH,
a municipal corporation
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC
Q S_ �'.
Robert C. Fiemak, Vice Pres. Fiayor
f ATTEST
Richard A. Swart, Vice Pres. City Clerk
REVIFWEP AND APPROVE} AnPRCVED AS TO FORM:
64
a �
City Administrat z V- & City Attorney t'6
INITIATED AND APPR VED:;
HIDirector of Put^lic WorXs
f
.,
1462L
e
`
.
p / 1
7/ S V Z 9 /! O
•+atS CLATIMATE IS YSSUED AS A MAMR Cu INFO,'AMA AL N ONE T ANrONFER5
EMETT & CHANDLERLOS EtNGELES, INC.
Ci:) R:#`,t�TS uPc�N THE C:CAT:PIS:A"G Ht`ii?ER lHfS i.�R' �tF �"E ^�.rES C.EC� A*t.�'ltifi
EXTEND OR ALTER T14E CGVERA6 AFFORD t) BY THE PG. ,CF-8 SE; : *
_ 11B35 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVAhiD, 5TH FLOOR
-.
LCS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 900E-0
t�(a
",IgS$iSl Ni S AFFORDING COVERAGE
TEL NO.: (213) 444--3333
TELEX NO.: 69.12L0
A
International Inst.ra.nce_ Company
Hartford Insurange QQPpany 1
James M. Montgomery Consulting
Engineers, Inc. et el
International. Ins jxrance__C,Qmp4ni
250 N. Madison Avenue
asadena, CA 91101
1 3
v. TWS {S ;� t f
x{i. Pv -'ISTA 7 AN
c "i hFA•
r. 54u-C-83634-6,
b,r31, 85 6/31/86 ,
'AX
1
�1 rCiO* 1 (}0 0ir
SIR
1,000-
vuc. insur, nce
as is asfc ded L, 1-clicy
C _ „. _ ,
. .. :. �4v 63" 34-
_ . -.,
. .
issue i ::tiiT.j'�ciI..y' t`s 8t: .all
be rirnaz, 3:.d
:x::r ot11,c ir;�uza;: e carried w
..x the >rzty a f
.: ,. tom::9to rI. be.>e.aeaess
EXCESS
Z.
W7RKEiRS :.:�MPEN54T, >a
H ..
P �- N a� :':. X4 f..: t l
._. _
h ,Yi, '
:5�t�
Et4�P�i3fRl2'S �>a,:�;a.v
q
OTHER
C Professional 524-065-424-4
8/31/65 6/ i1/rya $5, 0J0 , 000** eac*`
yLiabilit *** 1�'wu C4'tiCi
SIR . occurenGE'
Such insurance as is afforded by policy �34-683634_6 issued by company A shall:
also apply to the City of Huntington beach, its officers & employees as additio
CITY OF HUN'TING'TON BEACH SHOULD AkYOFTHE ABOVE lE5CRIBEirPOLICIES BECANCELLED i1UOORFTHE EK.
ARA''41DS VATE THSPIEO$!. THE ISSUING C•"MRANY MLL 3tztk4gEi3 h
l G O O Main Street 'AAIL 30 DAYS WRIT TEN N01tCF T^ x 4E CERTtFt&ATE .'4OLt-rA NAMED 10 THE
Huntington Beach, CA 2648
ATTN: fir. Paul Cook A,.- ���� a�> �-. �.r���
j.
PROPOSAL TO
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO PROVIDE
ENGINEERING SERVICES
fOR DESIGN OF
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FORCE MAINS AND
SEWER PUMP STATIONS
ATIONS
ON WARNER AVENUE
C ---�
JUNE 1986
JEl3KF.,S'14i. 3t OINTGOMERY. CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC.
EX UT A
JAMES M. MONTGOMER.Y, CONSUETING ENGT.NEERS, INC.
17802 Sky Park Circle, Suite 201. Irvine. California 92714 (714) 261-7210
A June 13, 1986
' City of 'Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
- Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
• Subject: Proposal for Providing Design Engineering Services for the
City of Huntington Beach Improvements to the Force :Mains
and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner avenue, CC-676
Gentlemen: ,
James M. l2ontgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JNIM) is pleased to submit this
proposal to the City of Huntington Beach in response to your request for proposal
for engineering services in connection with the design of Improvements to the
"orce Mains and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue. Jir M, with over Al
years of experience, offers highly professional engineering services to produce a
cost-effective design.
The content of this proposal documents our firm's unique qualifications to perform
the project. In summary, they include:
Expert -Project Team: The high quality of J.IvIM,s work depends largely on the
competence of its individual employees and the judicious blending of their
talents to meet the requirements of each particular project. To assure this �•
quality, the company policy is to staff each project with those who have the
requisite interest, time and skills, and to make provisions for their
interaction. The project manager assigned to your project, i11r.Robert F.
Seeman, has extensive experience in the engineering planning, design, and
construction of wastewater collection system projects such as yours.-
Related Experience: JMM' has desigped several hundred miles of major
sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. In addition, JMM capabilities
L include complete wastewater collection systems such as the $52 million
- interceptor sewerage systp.m for metropolitan, San Diego, California. This
system consists of 116,006 feet of 42 to 114-inch c;iameter interceptor
sewers, pumping facilities (including one of the world's largest wastewater
pumping stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment plant and 108-inch
diameter ocean outfall.
a
PLANNING... RESEARCH .. « ENViSONM'ENTAL ENGINEERING
JA-FAES Mt. \l0`""I'MNIERY. CONSULA ENGI.'CE1,109. 'INC. i7a02 Sky Pa& Sul-201 V--. Ca?.-92714 47TO 291.72!0
Mr. Les Evans -2- June 13, 1986
City of Huntint, con Beach
JMM has designed over 200 )vater and wastewater pumping stations ranging in
capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up
to 18,000 HP. These stationshave included all types of pumps, .both
electrical and natural gas driver units, electrical cont-ols for both local and
remote operations, and telemetering.
Complete In -House Capabilities: Our capabii�L:zs and in-house staff in all
disciplines assures a project that is coordinated well. It results in a project
with minimum number of change orders because it has been checked by the
" disciplines involved. Historically, on wastewater collection system projects
the amount of change orders has been less than 1-1/2 percent of the contract
amount.
Familiarity with the Project Requirements: We have discussed the key facets
of the proposal with ,your staff, visited the site, and have a thorough
understanding of `he City's requirements as set forth in your request for
proposal. Our experience in wastewater collection system design will enable
us to work closer with the City and to provide the City with a
comprehensive aiialysis of the various alternatives of pipe design, joint
' design, material specifications and purr_,) selection so as to ensure the
:,election of the optimum design for thQ improvement of the existing
,wastewater collection system.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and sincerely hope that we
will have the pleasure of working with you and your staff on this project. Please
contact us if you have any questions or desire additional information.
Very truly yours,
JAMES M. lIONTGOiMERY,
CONSI. t.TING ENGINEERS, INC.
Robert C. Siemak
Vice President
Manager, Irvine Office
I
■
SECTION l
METHOD OF APPROACH
it is proposed that James M. Montgomery, Consultir.,g Engineers, Inc. (J.V,,1d) will
provide consulting engineering services to the City of Huntington Beach for the
design of Improvements to the Force Mains and Sewer Pump StationsonWarner
Avenue.
BACKGROUND
The improvements to the farce mains and sewer pump stations on Warner Avenue
consist of upgrading the capacity of sewer pump station_ "D" on Warner Avenue in
the City of Huntington Beach t, 2500 gpm, increasing the wet well capacity at
pump stations "C" and "D" and rovide an additional parallel sewer force main out
of pump station I'D" to thr ange County Sanitation District line at Los Patos
Avenue and Marina Y, . Place. The scope of this project follows
recommendations of a P�..;H'/Warner Avenue Trunk Sewer System Report prepared
in .May t985 by ASL Consulting Engineers for the City of Huntington Beach. The '
report cited infiltration, manhole deterioration, and inadequate trunk sewer and
pump station capacities at the downstream portion of the system as major
problems.
OUR APPROACH TO THE'PROJECT
We propose to divid � the work into three tasks as follows:
Task A. Preliminary Design Phase
Task B. Design Phase
Task C. Construction Support Phase
The Preliminary Design Phase will consist of submitting a letter report evaluating
the proposed Scope of fork and developing alternative or additional strategies
towards the project pi?oblems, performing any necessary geotechnical or field
survey investigations, locating any utilities which may be affected by the project
scope, submati.ng preliminary cost estimates and schedules, attending periodic
meetings with City staff, and preparing monthly progress reports for City review.
The Design Phase will involve submitting a letter -report outlining design criteria
x
to be- used to complete the project scope, preparing design, plans and
specifications, and the entire bid package for City approval, preparing a traffic
control plan,, obtaining necessary permits for construction from the Cityand
"
attendingperiodic meetings with City staff. The Construction .Support. Phase will
consist of interpretation of plans End specifications, shop drawing reviews
"
e
submitcnl of "as -gilts' and attending periodic meetings with City staff.
JNENI's general philosophy is to work closely with the client during all phases of
the project to ensure that all project goals are attained through the application of
sound engineering concepts in a manner which is sensitive, to local needs.
Progress review meetings will be held in all phases of the ,iroject sciledule with
special emphasis at the Preliminary Design Phase and at the 50% and 90% design
completion leveis (Detailed Design Phase). These meetings are outlined further in
the following Scope of Stork.
SCOPE OF WORK
We understand Vie project Scope of Work to be as follows:
1. Upgrade sewer pump station "D" to a capacity of 2500 gpm,
2. increase the wet well capacity at pump station "C" and "D", and
& Provide an additional parallel sewer force main out of pump station
"D" to the OCSD line at Los Patos Avenue and Marina View Place.
Based on the abovementioned Scope, we propose the following tasks to ensure the
successful completion of the design, plans and specifications, contract documents
and cost estimates for improvements to the force mains and sewer pump stations
on Warner avenue.
Task A. Preliminary Design Phase
1. Submit a .letter report outlining strategies for improvements to the
recommended scope of work and consideration of alternate plans wi`'� .,ost
estimates. The report contents will be reviewed and approved t,, " • " ty
prior to proceeding with the detailed design. One (1) meeting wit" s
staff is allocated for this sub -task.
f '
2. Perform any necessary field survey or geotechnical investiga,ic .•
to the design.
3. Gather any plans, topographic surveys, reports, etc., available or, Est,
present and proposed projects near the project site. Review gatnered
information and determine what additional information is needed.
C Contact any utility companies, oil companies, etc., maintaining surface and
subsurface facilities in the work site area. Locate these facilities using as-
builts, topographical surveys, or maps obtained from these companies and
coordinate relocation of any of these facilities should conflicts with the
design arise.
5. Develop preliminary cost estimates and a project schedule.
6. attend one (1) meeting with City staff to discuss and clarify any additional
conflicts or questions arising out of work performed during the predesign
phase.
7. Provide lette, reports to the City on a monthly basis. These reports will
inform the City staff of all pertinent aspects of the project's progress during
the predesign and design phases.
Task B. - Design phase
1. Determine or establish design triteri ir requirements.
a. Determine basic design requirments for upgrading the pump station I'D"
capacityincluding existing pump type and phasing, primary pump drive,
�d standby power source, future operational pump requirements and
a.
ultimate; flow characterisitcs,
t
t 1-2
i
e
b. Determine Dade design requirements for increasing the wet well
capacity at pump stations "D" and "C" including existing and ultimate
flows and capacities, -pump -phasing, pump station' layout, existing piping
and electrical controls.
C. Establish design criteria for the force main including sizing, pipe
materials and joints, lining, trenching and backfill methods, surge control
and sewage characteristics.
d. Prepare a letter report summarizing the design criteria or requirements
K
of a,b, and c for City review and approval. One (1) meeting with City
k
staff is allocated for this subtask.
3.
Prepare civil, mechanical, electrical and structural design for the pump
station modifications based on design criteria in the City -approved letter
report. An operations plan will be developed for pumping stations "C" and "D"
along with the modifi^atons. Force main sizing, alignment and designwill.
include plan and profile sheets and details showing all structures and '
appurtenances. Plan and profile sheets will be prepared on a 1-inch equals 40
feet horizontal scale, and either -a 1-inch equals 4 feet or 1-inch equals 8 feet
verb.cal scale. Three (3) meetings with City staff will be allocated during the -
design and preparation of plans.
3.
Prepare specifications and reduced drawings as one complete package for the
project, including all legal forms necessary for receiving competitive bids.
Contract documents will be prepared incorporating City -provided insurance
forms and fro nt end documents. Drawings will include a cover sheet, Iocation
map, index', and condensed plan and profile. The complete package will
include the contract documents, general provisions, technical specifications,_
and drawings. One (1) set of reproducible final plans, specifications, and bid
documents will be submitted to the City.
4,,
Prepare traffic control and detour plans for the various phases of work, as
needed.
5.
Obtain the necessary approvals and construction permits from the Citv's
Development Services Department for any mechanical, electrical, etc. w
regaired of the project.
Task C. - Consti uetion Sport Phase
1.
Provide support to the City during bid advertisement and construction
including i.nterp,etation of plans and specifications, review and approval of
shop drawings, and recommendations for any needed changes that may arise
during construction.
2.
x
Provide "as -built" plans, after construction, from City -provided information.
3.
Three (3) meetings with City staff will be allotted during bidding and
construction.
1_3
d
&DDIT101 AL SERVICES
If requested or required, the following services will be furnished at an additional
r
fee:
1. Preparation of additional design to reflect unanticipated field conditions.
2. An.' items of work not previously mentioned above.
CITY FURNISHED SERVICES
it is understood that. the City of Huntin ;on Beach will provide the following
services during the project:
1. Printing of bid packages.
?. Advertisement of bids and awarding of contract.
3 3. Control of contract administration.
F,
d., Performance of required construction inspections.
' 5. City supplied mylars.
6. Any other additional information available which the parties agree may be
beneficial to the project design.
PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE
TIME TO COMPLETE
The work will commence on the 'project 'immediately upon receipt of the City's
N w 'tten Notice to Proceed. The design, plans and specifications will be completed
by October 14, 1986.
The following schedule will be used as a basis for completion of the project:
Notice to Proceed Ju0e 30, 1986
Design 50% Complete September, 1, 1986
Design 90% Complete .eptember 30, 1986
Design 100 o Complete October 14, 1986
Advertise for Bids November 1, 1986
' Thin schedule does not account for delays beyond the control of J:v M, including
but not limited to City reviews, requested design criteria changes, alignment
changes or inclement weather,
1-4
TASK DESCRIPTION
1986
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
LETTER REPORT
J
r
ti
SOILS
INVESTIGATIONS
u,
z
FIELD SURVEY
N
w
0
REVIEW EXISTING
o
INFORMATION
O
LETTER
0
o O
O
0% DESIGN
SUBMITTAL
90% DESIGN
SUBMITTAL
RMONTHLY
EPORTS
a
cc
PUMP STATION AND
CL
FORCE MAIN DESIGN
r
w
ci
PLANS AND
o
SPECIFICATIONS
_
OBTAIN PERMITS
CITY MEETINGS
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE F.M.S. & P.S. ON WARNER AVENUE'
PROJECT DESIGN SCHEEDULE
0
SECT ON 2
PROJECT ORGANMATfON
High quality engineering work; which is characteristic of J'MM projects is based
upon the capabilities and competence of the total staff, the expertise of
ti individual. employee;,- and the judicious blending of their talents to meet the
requirements of each project. The successful and timely completion of this -
project for the City of 'Huntington Beach will require a project -team of qualified
ind viduasls worlang within a management structure designed to maximize
pi"oductivlty aid expedite completion. The project organization and project team
members are summarized in this section. The project team would be structured"
and managed in accordance with the organization chart presented at the end of
_ this section. The structure and control procedures are based on JMM's successful
experience with sirntar projects.
It is the policy of JMM to staff all projects from our own organization of
experienced engineers. If selected to design the Improvements to the Force Mains
and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue project for the City, the design would
be carried out oy personnel assembled from the permanent staffs of our Irvine
B;^anch Office and Southwest Rebional Office in Pasadena. These two offices
have a combined total staff of over 250 individuals, 85 of whom are registered
professional engineers. .A project team has been selected from our staff to
provide innovative engineering and desi4 combined with prover, experience.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The design project for the City will require the skillful integration of expertise
from multiple disciplines. In order to assure productivity on all levels of project
input over the project )chedule, project management trust be carefully structured
to define the role of each team member, his responsibilities, and his authority for
major decisions.
The role of team members principally involved in the supervising project functions
are described in the followi;-a subsections.
PROJB^<, MANAGER
The major responsibility of the Project Manager into provide overall supervision
ana administration of the project. To a" hieve this, the duties of the Project
Manager include ensuring qualified staff are available to the project in adequate
numbers, directing the project approach any reviewing the quality of the output
product, monitcring its progress and meeting deadlines, and assuring cost control
of the total effort. The Project Manager will also determine what major issues
require input from the Technical Review Committee or other specialists and
arrange for meetings. He will also be responsible for all client, contact &nd ensure
that the work performed is in accordance with the terms and conditions agreed to
p with the City of Huntington Beach.
2-1
J
PROTECT ENGINEER
The 'Project Engineer will supervise the day-to-day activities of the project team
members and review their progress with respect to the total project schedule.
_ '1lie Project Engineer will be responsible for the technical integr> -y of the project
and provide for uniform and consistent design and approach.
PROJECT 5TAFF
The qualifications of key individuals identified on the Project Organization Chart
are briefly summarized in the following paragraphs. Detailed biodata of team
members can be found at the end of this Section. All team members have been
selected on the basis of their qualifications as related to this project and are
available to participate iithin the time -frame establish• d in the request for
- proposal.
PROJECT MANAGER- Robert F. Seeman
Mr. Seeman, a iMM Principal Engineer, has over 16 years of experience in project
management, design and construction monitoring of water` and wastewater
projects. Mr. Seeman would serve as Project ?.tanager End also ;would be
responsible_ for design of the City of Huntington Beach Improvements to the Force
Mains and Sewer Pump Stations on warner Avenue.
PROJECT ENGINEER - Raymond M. Hahn
Nlr. Hahn., a Senior Project Engineer for JMM, has experience in the planning,
design, preparation of contract documents and specifications of water and
wastewater collection systems. His past projects include a sewer master plan for
the :Moulton Niguel water District and a predesign study of pump station, force
main and gravity sewer for San Diego County. He has a multitude of computer
experience including modeling of water -id wastewater collection 4echnioues,
surveying and various civil engineering and planning computer applications. Mr.
Hahn is a registered professional engineer in the State of California.
PROJECT SUPPORT STAFF
Asir. John A. Karap would supervise the civil design and lays°•t of the pump station
modificationsand force main. Mr. Constantino Senon would handle the
mechanical design and specifications for upgrading the pump station facilities.
Mr. Marcos R. Santos would be responsible for the electrical design and
specifications of the project. Mr. Mark E. Fordham would supervise any
structural design necessary to complete expansion and upgrading of the pumping
station wet well capacities'. Mr. William T. McGivney would be responsible for
quantity takeoff and preparation of final construction cost estimates. Mr. A. 'Lee
R.amage, will provide field survey services necessary for design of the City's
project: Outside geotechnical services can be provided as necessary.
2-2
M
TECH IICAL .REVIEW COMMITTEE
To ensure that JMNLI's extensive exferie_,nce is focused on this project, the
Technical Review Committee would review the -roject following the preliminary -
layout stage, the preliminary design stave and completion of the final design. The
_ Techra.cal Review Committee is composed of three of J.v.'Ils most experienced
technical experts who are not involved in the project on a di .--today basis. The
expert's function is to provide an outside, truly objective view of all of the
significant aspects of the project. The Technical Review Committee ensures the
quality control of all JIIM projects and :s t,ie City's insurance that their
investment results in a efficient and cost-effective project.
C'RAIR`41AN - Philip Gatsoulis
Mr. Gatsoulis, a Principal Engineer, Chairman of Technical Review Committee
_ and JMNI Vice President, has over 28 years of experience in civil and structural
engineering. He has supervised personnel in numerous water system and
wastewater collection system projects.
Mr. Gatsoulis is currently the Manager of JM.N1's Southwest Region and Discipline
Director of Water Retaining Structures and Structural Engineering. In addition,
he; is responsible for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic
structures, major pipelines and special projects.
R. Dewey Dickson
Mr. Dickson► has over 30 years of experience in civil engineering management and
development of design concepts. His experience ranges from watet supply
systems to wastewater pumping stations, two of the numerous areas in which he is
consi0ered JMM Discipline Expert. :fir. Dickson is also a leader in the
AIA/CEAC sponsored "Value Engineering Workshop and is a qualified value
engineering analyst.
Robert C. Siemak
Mr. Siemak is a registered civil engineer in California and is presently the
Manager of J'M 11's Irvine Branch Office. He has ..n extensive background in civil
and sanitary engineering including design of water .and wastewater facilities. In
recent years, Mr. Siemak has been involved in Qi areas of project management
and engineering ranging from evaluation, testing .,nd selection to detailed design
and construction manaaem'ent. He has completed the AIA/ACEC Value
Engineering Workshop and is qualified for value engineering participation.
SUMMARY
The JNI:M Team represents a highly qualified: group of engineers and architLxcts
who will enure the efficient design and construction of the City of Huntington
Beach project within the requiredtime and budget constraints. Biographical data
_ on the key project team members are included in this section.
2-3
CITY OF
HUNTINGT'ON BEACH
TECHNICAL REVIEW
PROJECT MANAGER
COML
R08ERT F. SEEMAN
PHILIP
(CHROBERR.
DEW
PROJECT ENGINEER
RAYMOND M. HAHN
OUTSIDE SERVICES DESIGN
SUPPORT STAFF
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
CIVIL -
JOHN A. KAMP
MECHANICAL -
CONSTANTINO M. SENON
ELECTRICAL_-
MARCOS R. SANTOS
STRUCTURAL-
MARK E. FORDHAM
COST
WILLIAM T. 'McGIVNEY
ESTIMATES
FIELD
A. LEE RAMAGE
SURVEY
R. DEWEY DICKSON
EXECUTIVE V!Si; PRESIDENT
EDUCATION: B.E., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in. California
Professional Engineer in Arizona, Colorado, Ficrida, Maryland,
Nevada, South Dakota and Virginia
Diplomate, American Academy of Environmentat Engineers
SUMMARY:
Mr. Dickson has extensive experience in civil engineering management and development
of design concepts with primary involvement in water works and water resources ,projects.
_ Background is extensive in feasibility investigations, master planning, and design analyses
of water supply and distribution systems. He has been involved with feasibility studies,
conceptual design, preparation of plans and specifications and construction monitoring for
most of the large -diameter pipeline projects designed by the firm. Mr. Dickson has also
- been ultimately involved in the design of numerous pumping stations, reservoirs and water
treatment plant. He has been a leader in the AIA/CEAC sponsored Value ,Engineering
' Workshop and is a qualified value engineering analyst.
EXPERiEN CE:
h
I,
DAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Mr. Dickson is executive vice president and chief engineering officer, and director of the
firm. Since joining the firm in 1953, he has served progressively as design engineer,
project engineer, office engineer, senior project engineer, head of the Water and
Wasfewater Engineering Department, and is presently in charge of'corperate engineering.
In the latter role, Mr. Dickson's primary responsibility is to maintain the firm's-
Engineerini, Excellence program. Mr. Dickson has Served in various roles as project
~ engineer, project manager and principal -in -charge for major transmission pipeline projects
such as Las Vegas Valley Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District,
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, and the cities of Beverly Hills, Monrovia, and
- Pomona. As a member of the Standa_ds Council and chairman of the Steel Pipe
Committee of the American; Water Works Association, he has gained broad knowledge of
all types of piping materials and construction methods which have proven to be most cost-
effective to the owners. As a principal engineer and senior company officer, he has been
in charge of design of multimillion -dollar water works and water resources projects and
has prepared feasibility studies and master plans for numerous municipalities, public
agencies, and private water companies:
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
Design 17.ngineer: Mr. Dickson's major function was the supervision of engineering design
and drafting for various projects involving site layouts, roads, airports, storm drainage,
water supply and distribution, wastewater collection systems, and liquid waste treatment
and disposal. He was in charge of the civil engineering phase of design and preparation of
construction drawings for a 15,000-man Marine Corps Base in California.
MARK E. FORDHAAI
EDUCATION: M.S., Structural Engineering, University of Illinois
B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Illinois
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California
Structural. Engineer in California
Professional Engineer in Colorado and Oregon
4
SUMMARY:
Mr. Fordham has over 15 years of experience in structural and civil engineering in the
design and construction of reservoirs, commercial, port facilities, marinas, road..,:,,
bridges, architectural and 'industrial facilities.
EXPERIENCE:
_ JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
- As Supervising Engineer, Mr. Fordham designed the 32 :-illion gallon, prestressed
concrete Eastside Reservoir for the Seattle, 'Washington Water ]Department. Since the
reservoir site is in a seismically active area, the structure was analyzed for earthquakes
usin, a finite element program on JMM's in-house computer system.
Mr. Fordham was responsible for the design of the waterholding structures for the Living
Seas Pavilion, EPCOT Center. The major aquarium is Z00 feet in diameter with a Zb-
foot eater depth. The tank wall is penetrated by several large acrylic windows and two
tunnels which access a viewing pod near tse. center of the aquarium. He was responsible
for review of special finite elements analysis of the wall openings and acrylic windows.
He served as assistant to WED Enterprises' project engineer at the EPCOT Center to
expedite the construction of the fast -track project.
He was responsible for the structural design of the 18.2 million gallon Walteria Reservoir
for the City of Torrance, California. The reservoir has an irregular shape, requiring-
specialized analysis for earthquake loadings.
MAJOR ENGINEERING FIRM, DENVER, COLORADO
Mr. Fordham served as project manager for the design and construction of the Yosemite
Street Overpass for the Greenwood, South Metropolitan District, Greenwood Village,
Colorado. The forty --span, precast, prestressed concrete bridge carries five banes of
traffic. over Intersta!e Z5. The project required the construction of 30,000 square feet of
precast retaining wall- to minimize right-of-way requirements for the roadway. The
project received the. 1984 PCA ,Award of Excellence for the Rocky Mountain Region.
He, was lead bridge engineer for the design of the Santa Fe/Evans Interchange for the
- Colorado Department of Highways, Denver, Colorado. The urban interchange requires
four prestressed concrete box gi,der structures with_a total length of 1,32E feet.
He has been involved in several other bridge design projects, including I-15, Power
County, Idaho; Kingsley Hydro Project, Ogallala, Nebraska; and Standard_ Bridge Designs,
Idaho :Department of "Transportation.
k
_ He was project manager for the structural design of the Johns Landing Office Building,
Portland, Oregon. 'The zoo -story structure utilized a combination of steel and wood
~ framing to minimize costs. The architect for the projects was Bocr, Portland, Oregon.;
j
MARK E. FORDEIAM (Continued)
lie was p ojec! manager for the structural design of the Red Rocks Christian Church,
Boise, Idaho. 'Me square ssnctuar, -gas framed glued -laminated gables and concealed
tension straps ou Toad -bearing masonry walls. The architect for the project was the
Design Planning Group, Boise, Idaho.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Fordham has served as lead bridge engineer for the prelimina. 7 design of the Vista
Avenue railroad overpass for the Ada County Highway Commission, Boise, Idaho. The
single --span, steel -box, through -girder bridge will carry the lsurlington :Northern Railroad
over six lanes of traffic.
He has participated in the design of several seater distribution and storage projects
including the Cherryvale pump station for Boulder, Colorado; Conduit No. 55 for the
Denver Water Department; and the pump stations and 5.2 million gallon steel reservoir'
at the R.D. Nixon project, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
He provided the structural engineering for geothermal projects for Warm Springs Water
District, Boise, Idaho, and. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Raft River, Idaho.
Mr. Fordham's power-- distribution experience includes structural design of the
138/12.5 kV Victory Substation for Idaho 'Power Company and a 96 kV transmission line
for Alaska Electric Light and Power Company, Juneau, Alaska.
Mr. Fordham has provided. plan review and construction monitoring services for several
commercial projects including, the Tabor Center and Ptarmigan Place, Denver, Colorado,
for Citicorp; the Salt Lake City Elks Club- Office Conversion for Occidental Life
Insurance Company, for the Idaho Elks Rehabilitation Hospital, Boise, Idaho; Boise
Redevelopment Agency historic structures, Boise, Idaho; and the St. Joseph's Hospital,
St. Charles, Missouri.
In addition, Mr. Fordham was responsible for the structural design of several low-rise
office buildings for the MSK Office Park, Boise, Idaho. The architect for the projects was
Dropping, Kelley and La Marche, Boise, Idaho.
Mr. Fordham has participated in several energy -related projects. He as an L-security
clearance at the U.S. Department of Energy/:Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho Falls,,
Idaho. At that facility, he was project manager for the conceptual design of the
Transient Reactor Test Facility upgrade of buildings, facilities, and utilitiesand for the
design of modifications to the EBR III Reactor deckplate shielding.
Mr. Fordham has served as lead structural engineer for the design of several municipal
wastewater treatment plants including Colorado Springs, Denver, Boulder, and Widefield,
Colorado; Boise, Nampa, Burley, and Idaho Falls, Idaho; and Salem and Sweet Home,
Oregon.
He has also been responsible for the structural design of the Loveland, Colorado Water
Treatment Plant and the headworks/powerhouse and the flocculation/sedimentation
basins at the. Denver Foothills Water Treatment Plant. In addition, he has provided
engineering design for modifications to both water treatmentplants for Boulder,
y Colorado.
OR ANIZATIONS: Structural Engineers Association of California
American Society of Civil Engineers
PEaLIP GATSOUL7S
VICE 'PRFSMENT
EDUCATION: M.S., Civil Engineering, University of Texas
B.S., Civil Engineering, Robert College, Istanbul, Turkey
REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer in California and Oregon
Structural Engineer in California, Nevada and Oregon
Diplomate, American Academy of Environmental Engineers.
SUMMARY:
Mr. Gatsoulis has over 28 pears of experience in civil and structural engineering and
project management with primary involvement in the investigation, study, and design of
water storage reservoirs, pipelines, treatment plants, pumping stations, and the prepara-
tion of master plans. He has an extensive background in administration, and direction of
engineering personnel in development, planning and design of water works projects. He
has supervised Field -personnel for numerous hydraulic structures and major pipelines,
water and wastewater collection projects, and master planning. In addition to water
works engineering, he has been responsible for structu-, al design and planning of bridges,
commercial buildings, industrial plants, military installations, and recreational park
developments.
I - '
EXPERIEN i- is
JAMES M. MONTGOMER`P, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Management: Mr. Gatsoulis is Discipline Director of hydraulic structures and manager of
the southwest branch offices. As Discipline Director, he is respons:�le. company -wide,
for conceptual and technical design reviews of hydraulic structures, major pipelines and
special projects.
Project Manager: Water master plans for the cities of La Habra, Redlands and Riverside,
California; wastewater collection system master plan for the city of Redlands; and
structuralengineering manager for the EPCOT (Experimental Prototype City of
Tomorrow) Seas Pavilion in. Walt Disney World, Florida. He has participated in special
studies and investigations on pipeline failures, foundatior repairs and structural integrity.
Project Engineer: Experience includes the design of a 645-million-gallon buried rein-
forced concrete reservoir for East Bay Municipal Water District, a reservoir and pumping'
station for the city of Monrovia, California, and other reservoirs for the cities of Pomona,
Beverly Hills and Redlands, California; and a 60-million-gallon reservoir and pumping
station for the city of San Francisco. He was involved in the design of a reinforced
concrete bridge to the San-Antonio-Calaveras water treatment plant in San Francisco and
for numerous reservoirs, buried or partially buried, with multi -purpose utilization of the
roof area.
Structural. Engineer: fir. Gatsoulis` experience includes potential seismic and dynamic
force analyses for earthquake resistant design of major liquid retaining strurtures and
buildings Earthquake resistant designs for which fir. Gatsoulis was responsible ware the
multi -purpose -use buried reinforced concrete Greystone and 'aunsmuir reservoirs, the
.access bridge across the Arroyr, Seco to the Jet :propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, and
numerous other facilities.
_ PmLip GATSOIILIS (CowrINUED)
VICE PRESIDENT
International Assignments: Assignments include Brazil, the Philippines,_ Australia and
Indonesia, either as a project engineer or for technical review on water treatment and
distribution projects.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES
Structural Designer: Mr. Gatsoulis was directly involved with the structural design and
planning supervision of pulp mills, industrial plants and the Matterhorn Mountain in
Disneyland, California.
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FIRMS IN LOS ANGELES
Struc' z'al Designer: Work involved designs for chemical process plants, support facility
build` * ,, aircraft hangars, petrochemical facilities and an atomic reactor facility for the
Atomi.: F' -rgy Comm ssion, presently the Department of Energy (DOE).
Assistant Engineer: Mr. Gatsoulis participated in the design and preparation of structural
plans for substation equipment support structures, a steam plant, and miscellaneous other
structures.
ORGANIZATIONS: American. Society of Civil Engineers
American Concrete Institute
American Water Works Association
Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
American Academy of Environmental Engineers
y
RAYMOND M. RAHPI
EDUCATION: B.S., Civii Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona, California
R.EG&TRATION: Civil Engineer in California
SUMMARY
Mr.: Hahn's background in civil engineering includes engineering feasibility studies,
master planning, preliminary and detailed design of transmission, pumping and
storbge, facilities, preparation of contract documents and specifications and
preparation of legal descriptions for improvement districts. He is also
experienced in computer modeling of water and wastewater systems, surveying
programs and various civil engineering and planning computer applications.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Senior Engineer: dlr. Hahn is responsible for the preparation of plans and
specifications, project coordination, shop drawing review and various design and
consv action administration aspects of water' and wastewater facilities. He has
partici�utied in the design of a 36-inch water pipeline and a large domestic water
pumping station. He is currently participating in preliminary desiL-n studies of a
66-inch transmission main and pumping station to be used to divert storm water as
pant of a ground water replenishment program. In ae Jition, he is serving as
project engineer on several deep well pump station designs.
CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA
Project Engineer: Mr. Hahn was primarily responsible for the preparation o,
engineering feasibility studies and master plans of water and sewer systems. He
has served' as 'project engineer on numerous computer -based master plans for
clients throughout California and Arizona, many of which have included'
development of flow coefficients, monitoring programs, infiltration and inflow
studies rind other calibration techniques. He was also involved in design of
collection and trunk sewers, preparation of legal descriptions for large
improvement districts, preparation of specifications and irrigation studies for
reclaimed water applications.
ORGANIZATIONS; Orange County Water association
JOHN A- KAMP
EDUCATION: Los. Angeles State College
SIIItifiMARY:
Mr. Kamp has over Z7 years of experience in civil and structural engineering planning,
design and construction supervision. His backgi ound includes design development, survey,
field inspection, and project coordination of various water supply facilities and storm
drainage structures. He isexperienced in siting, grading, paving, roadway alignment,
rotating structures orientation, preparation of design and contract documents, and overall
resident engineering services.
EXPERMNCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Supervising Senior Designer:' Vfr. Kamp has participated in water and se wer facilities
design, site development, storm drain design, and street improvement projec's .for several
water districts, municipalities and private land development firms in the Orange County
?,sea and Southern California- He has been responsible for design of watertransmission
mains, pressure regulation stations, drilling and equipping of water wells, reservoir siting
and. grading, preparation of parcel maps and legal descriptions. He has served as resident
engiz-Per on several construction projects. Experience in t}-is area was as resident
engineer on an 8-million-gallon buried concrete reservoir, and Z-1/Z miles of 39-inch-
diameter water transmission pipeline. He has also been responsible for construction
supervision, and resident engineering services fc.- two major water districts in Orange
_ County.
He has been involved in design of storm drainage structures, street improvements and
utility alignments fcr several municipalities. Additional responsibilities included
preliminary site design of a mobile -home park and complete development of a Z3-acre
landsite including underground utilities, street development, grading and paving, parking
layout and building siting, preparation of parcel, maps, street improvement and parking
f
master plans, miscellaneous legal descriptions for acquisitions, and quitclaims.
ENGINEERING-CON.TMUCTION IN LOS ANGELES, CA_LIFORNLA
Design _Engineer: Mr. Kam "s civil and structural engineering experience included such
diverse projects as missile launch and support facilities, airports and runways, communi-
cation facilities, roads, public utilities, ,and petroleum -chemical facilities. He was
responsible, as lead deAgner, on aircraft parking and taxi strips at Kirkland and Hickam
Air Forces Bases, including both ridged and flexible pavements, drainage, and mis-
cellaneous utilities. He was responsible for the design of a 3000-foot runway extension
at Johnson Island area with facilities for washdown, fueling, and decontamination; an
aircraft maintenance facility at San Francisco 'International Airport, an $8.5 'million
project ,Z.or runway and taxiway design to accommodate .Z5-million-pound aircraft at Los
Angeles International Airport; paving, access roads,• and L�.,li'ties for COMSAT sites in
Hawaii, Virginia, California, and Puerto Rico; a Data Computation Center, at Vandenberg'
AForce Base; and missile and deep space antenna sites in over 30 locations throughout'
the world,'
�.� 3, ,. �.o,.R.v a+a , .g•, , � 4.•usr�.w'a ai+ ✓?LN'�'',�Y �.
^, JOHN )L KAMP (CONTINUED)
CONSULI-ING ENGINEERING FIRM IN FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA
Project Engineer: Mr. Kamp was responsible for survey, design and ccnstruction
activities. He handled approximately 19 projects for street improvement plans which
included storm drains, curbs, gutters, wastewater collection systems, and, pavements an
. Los AngeleF, San Diego, and Orange Counties.
CONSULTING <jNGINEERING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Civil Des:finer and Draftsman: Projects involved design and drafting of Los Angeles
County Flood Control storm drain systems.
ENGINEERING -MANUFACTURING FIRM IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Stxuctur Designer and Draftsman: Mr. Kamp was responsible for design and drafting of
various types of Electrical substation structures.
4 EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING FIRM IN ALHAMBRA, CA.ISFORNTA
Mechanical Draftsman: Layout detail and assembly crafting of mechanical equipment,
ENGINEERI21IG-CONSTRUCTION FIRM II4 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA
Structural Designer and Draftsman: Design and drafting for various structural projects.
C= OF GLEENDALE, CALIFORNIA
Civil Engineering Draftsman: Design and drafting of public works projects.
'i
W ILLIAM T. McGIVNEX
EDUCATION., M.S., Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island
B.S., Economics, California PolytechnicUniversity
- SUMMARY:
Mr. McGivney provides highly specialized cost estimating services and economic
analytical assistance to JMM' engineering project;. This expertise is based on years of
practical experience with construction planning techniques Since joining our £ira he has
been involved with review and implementation of state-of-the-art computer assisted cost
escimating programs at TMM. His experience includes in-depth financial and accounting
analysis as con`troiler for a. major manufacturing firm.
' EXPERIENCE.
+ JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, , INC.
Senior Cost Estimator: Mr.. McGivney is assigned to the firm's Financial Studies hivision
as principal estimator.He is rtsponsiole for the preparation of final cost` estirnatez :)n
water and wastewater treatma rrt plants, pumping stations, reservoirs, transmission
pipelines, operations a. -id control r.,Aildings, and other associated plant facility designs
produced by the firm. In this capacity, Mr. McGivney provides updating; of all price
indexing and unit price changes relating to component materials common' to water and
wastewater construction. He is also directly involved with the firms various computer
models used in the analysis of treatment plant costs and project cost optimization
developed to assist project engineers with both preliminary and detailed cost estimates as
well as alternative design selection. He recently completed an estimate for a JMM
designed pr,,.j'ect (in joint venture with another firn-0 with the City of Los Angeles
involving mLre than two thousand contract daawings and over seventeen thousand pages of
specifications with an estimated construction cost in excess of $200 million.
MAJOR MANUFACTURING FIRM, LOS ANGELES
In the role of plant controller, Mr. McGivney was resporsible to corporate officers for
continuous detailed analysis of plant operating costs and profit analysis for all product
lines. He maintained a current data, base for the computer inventory system (M.I.S.
including reconciliation of printout -eports to verify system integrity.,
PRIVATE BUSINESS
Mr. McGivney spent a number of years in the private business sector in the construction
market, He spent two yeas as general manager of wc cabinet and millwork companies
performing all management functions, all cost estimating, and the fixing of profit margins
for the entire product spread. Mr. McGivney was self-employed for several years in
commercial and residential construction. He operated as a, general contractor and was
directly responsible for estimating, project management, and coordination of all partic-
pating trades.
x
A. LEE RAMAGE
1
EDUCATION: International Correspondence School, Courses in_Surveying
SUMMARY
Mr. Rama.q,e has over 28 years of experience as a surveyor for civil and sanitary
engineering projects.
i EXPERIENCE:
�x
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Surveyor Chief of Party: Mr. Ramage has been -a surveyor with the firm for over 23_
year:,.. He has performed field_ survey work for all the major water and wastewater
facilities designed by JMM during that time. These- projects include water and
wastewater treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, water distribution pipelines,
transmission mains, and wastewater collection and disposal systems.
Recently completed design. projects which are typical of Mr. Ramage`s surveying
experience are the 36-mile Devil. Canyon --Azusa Pipelu-te which is transporting water to
_ Los ?ingeles, and San Eeznardino Counties, California; the 75 mgd Escondido -Vista
Filtration Plant; and a 45 mgd water treatment plant and. 10 mg water storage reservoir
for the city of Fairfield, California.
LOS ANGEL,ES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, LOS ANGELES,
CA.L70RNIA
Surveyor: Performed survey work for sanitary engineering project., which included sewage
treatment and collection ,facilities, trunk lines and interceptors.
A�
MARCOS R. SANTOS
EDUCATION: B.S., Electrical Engineering, Mapua Institute of
Technology, Manila, Philippines
Proficiency Cer-tificate in Metering and Maintenance of
Electrical Apparatus, the David Ranken, Jr: School,
St. Louis, Missouri
REGISTRATION; Electrical Engineer in California
Professional Engineer in the Philippines
SUMMARY:
Over 18 years' experience in planning and design of electrical control, power and lighting
distribution systems. Background includes preparation of specifications, unit layouts, and
engineering plans, review of shop drawings, and field inspection of installations. Mr.
Santos has held teaching assignments in electrical engineering and is a 'specialist in..
3 metering; and maintenance of electrical apparatus.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Mr. Santos is presently assistant chief electrical engineer and has worked on electrical
control, power and lighting distribution systems for various water works protects. He has
prepared specifications, performed electrical and control engineering and directed design
work for water treatment plant electrical systems, pumping stations, electrical
sub -stations, and is responsible for design review of installation and shop drawings. His
assignments have included work in Brazil, Indonesia, Philippines and Japan as specialist in
electrical and control engineering for water treatment plants.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT - CONTRR-�CTOR FIRM IN LOS ANGELES,
CALIFORNIA
Designed electrical power systems for large government facilities and airports. 'Mork
involved layouts of indoor substations, generating units, motor control centers, lighting,
receptacles, cables and conduit routings, etc. :York also involved checking of calculations
for short-circuit currents, si.es and coordination of circuit breakers, wires, conduits,
pull:oxes, etc.
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT - CONTRACTOR FIRM IN DETROIT, WI CIEGAN
Prepared electrical plans for industrial plants and commercial buildings. ;York involved
layout of unit substations, lighting, receptaeies, cable traps, conduits, etc.
_ ATOMIC ENERGY ENGINEERING FIRM IN ONTARIO, CANADr
Assisted in the design and layout of motor control diagrams, relays, supervisor! systems,
and asscN:iated apparatus as applied to nuclear power, station operation.
..w
MAPUA INSTTTUTy OF TEC-HNOLOGY IN MANILA, PB=PINES
Instructor in e.ements and princiales of ac-dc circuits and machineries; %nstructor in
electrical engineering laboratories. While a faculty member, was also self-employed as a
s
MARCOS R. SANTOS (CONTINUED)
a professional engineer and prepared design and specifications for power distribution,
lighting and controls on commercial buildings, schools, shopping centers, and industrial
plants.
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FIRM IN M Nn A, PHTILIPPINES
Dutiesincluded field Rork and preparation of design plans for various types of electrical
installations.
BURr-.tiU OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN M i lnA., PHI IPPINES
Worked as an instructor in practical electricity in a vocational school in Manila. Was also
in charge of planning, installation a. -id maintenance of the school's electrical system.
During this time, he attended a 1-year course in metering and maintenance of electrical
apparatus at The David Ranken, Jr. School in St. Louis, 'Yfissoeri.
ROBERT' F. SEEMAN
EDUCATION: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Southern California,
Los Angeles, California
REGISTRATION:: Civil Engineer in California
SUMMARY:
Mr.. Seeman has over 16 years of experience in project management, engineering planning,
design and construction management of water, wastewater and drainage systems. Back-
ground includes water and wastewater system master planning, preliminary and detailed
design and project coordination of various water and wastewater transmission, pumping
and storage facilities, storm drainage master planning, engineering feasibility studies, site
improvement designs, environmental evaluations,_ and preparation of contract documents
and specifications. He is also experienced in the development and utilization of computer
programs in analyzing water and wastewater systems.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTC'OMERY, CONIa'tTLTING ENGINEERS, INC.
_ Principal Engineer: Mr. Seeman has been responsible for the preparation of water,
wastewater and drainage master plans, feasibility studies, site grading r?=ns, detailed
water, wastewater and drainage plans and specifications for a number of projects. He has
participated as project engineer in the detailed designs of several buried and semi -buried
concrete reservoirs for the Yorba Linda County and Laguna Beach County Water Districts
as well as the administrating and coordinating the construction of the reservoir projects.
Mr. Seeman has also managed and designed several steel tanks for agencies in the Orange
County area. He has been involved in the detailed designs of water and wastewater
pum ing stations, transmission and distribution water mains, sewer force mains and storm
drainage collection systems.
Mr. Seeman has conducted water supply feasibility studies for several cities and water
agencies in the Orange County area, He has been responsible for the design and
construction inspection of water transmission and distribution facilities for Yorba Linda
County Water District, the City of San Clemente, Irvine Ranch. Water District, Rancho
California Water District and 'Mean Consolidated Water District. He has prepared water
system master plans for the Laguna Beach County Water District, Rancho California
Water District and the Yorba Linda County Water District, a sewer system .master plan
for the City of Buena Park as well as the storm drainage master plan for the City of
Garden Grove. Additional experience has included site grading plans and field observation.
of Construction projects.
CITY OF LOS ANGET.ES, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
Civil Engineering Assistant: Mr. Seeman worked in the Strt;ctural Design Section which
was responsible; for the design and preparation of plans for the Los Angeles Reservoir
Outlet Tower Complex. He worked in tht master planning group which analyzed the Los
Angeles City'ti distribution and transmission systems. He has ,also worked on the
development of computer programs for the Water Design Division.
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
Orange County Water Association
Mxtrtirst�r-twsem:^s:.,�.��sah w+:s<.�k. ✓ .
CONSTANTINO NL SENON
EDUCATION: B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Central Philippine
University, Iloilo City, Philippines
REGISTRATTON; Mechanical Engineer in the Philippines
Professional Engineer (Mechanical) in California and Nevada
SUMMARY:
Over '15 years of experience in design and selection of mechanical equipment, piping and
flue work for various industrial plant facilities. Background includes design development,
drawing review, cost estimating, site inspection, and site supervision of water treatment,
high- A nature air pollution control, material handling, and sugar manufacturing
facili :.
TAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
PrincipalEngineer- Mr. Senon serves as assistant head of the firm's Mechanical. Division
and is responsible for coordinating the efforts of various project engineers and other
support groups assigned to this activity. fir. Seno- has worked on the design of pumping
stations, piping, mechanical equipment, wager and wastewater treatment plants with
energyrecovery systems, H-V,1AC with passive solar systems, and energy calculations for
industrial and commercial buildings. These projects include the 50 mgd Central Utah
Water Conservancy District water treatment plant, C:ty of North Las Vegas pumping
station, Costa Mesa operations facility building, Cucamonga County Water District water
treatment plant with variable -speed pumping station, Chino Basin MSVD wastewater
treatment plant expansion, City of Corona wastewa,',,er treatment plant, Duchesne Valley
wato-r treatment plant, Rotas City water treatment plant (Philippines), Tangerang water
tieatmeni :slant (Indonesia), and Oakview wastewater treatment plant. For the past three
years, Mr. Senon has worked on projects in the Philippines on the design and construction
supervision of 'Metropolitan 'Waterworks and Sewerage System 5.0 cu.m.%sec. Tondo
Ocean, Outfall Pump Station, rehabilitation of 7 lift stations and 1,400 square meter water
and wastewater laboratory building,
MAJOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, LOS A.NGELES, CALIFORNIA
Engineer: Designed piping, flue work, HV/AC, gas conditioning system (spray tower)
pneumatic control systems, ash handling systems, including the selection of fans, blowers,
and motors in sizes up to 500 hp.
MAJOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FIRM IN SOUTEERN CAIZFORNIA.
Engineer: Designed material handling facilities for U.S. Postal Service. Design included
conveyors, monorail systems, automatic unloaders, 'iVfAC, pneumatic system, hydraulic
system, and dust collector*.
ENGINEERING FIRM IN TEE PHiLTpPI'NES
Engineer: Designed, selected and supervised fabrication of mechanical equipment for
sugar manufacturing facilities, cement and coal bulk material handling, ice plantsand
power plants. Designs included calculations for each system, such as clarifiers,
rt�
R073ERT C. SIEMAi{
EDUCATION: M.S., Sanitary Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
B.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles
REGISTRATION; Civil Engineer in California, Utah and Arizona
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade V
SUMMARY:
` Mr. Siemak's background in civil and sanitary engineering includes design in 'rater and
wastewater, pilot ,plant operation and design, full-scale plant testing, construction
management, process selection studies, field investigation of domestic seater systems; and
preparation of ground water monitoring programs. Mr. Siemak has completed both
facilities plans and water quality studies. He has also completed the AIA/ACEC Value
Engineering workshop and is qualified for value engineering participation.
EXPERIENCE:
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Principal Engineer: Mr. Stemak is the manager of the firm's Irvine Branch office. He
specializes in prototype treatment studies and coi.ceptual and detailed design of water
and wastewater treatment systems. During recent years, M. r. Siemalz has been ,involved in
all areas of project engineering and management ranging from process evaluation, pilot
and full scale plant testing and process selection, to detailed design and construction
management, fir. Siemak served as project engineer on t;ie 60 mad water treatment plant
planning and design project for the City of Tucson, Arizona, project manager for the
m lZ ad Palmdale 'slater District water treatment plant and the 35 mgd WFA-JPA (Upland,
California area) water treatment plant. The Tucson project involved treatment of
` anticipated Central Arizona Project water in the greater Tucson. area_ The Palmdale
Water 'District and WFA-JPA projects involved the treatment of State Project Water.
Other water treatment projects involvement include pilot plant design, construction,
' operation and process selection for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 600
mad water treatment plant; full-scale plant testing of a 40 -,mad water treatment plant for
the Santa Clara Valley Water District; preparation of a design report for a 27.5 mad water
treatment plant for Casitas Municipal Water District; a preliminary evaluation of water
treatment systems for the C'iino Basin Municipal `Hater District; and pilot plant
evaluations of water treatment plant operations for the Hunter District Water Board
(Australia).
Mr. Siemak has also been involves. :with construction management serviceF for several
projects including the Plant No. 3 addition for the Camarillo Sanitary Oistri.;t, the plant
modification and upgrading for the Oak View Sanitary District, and the upgrading
modifications to the City of Thousand Oaks Olsen Road. W',VTP.
Mr. Siemak also has experience in wastewater trey fitment system design and evaluation as
demonstrated by his serving as project engineer on several projects including design of a
Z5 mgd wastewater <treatment plant for the South Valley (Utah) Water Reclamation
Facility Board; odor control study for Clark County Sanitation District, and preliminary
design of a wastewater collection system at Independence Lake for WED (Disney)
.Enterprises. As project manager, fir, Siemak has also been involved :wit_lh the preliminary
mA design, project: management, and start-up of 'a an 8 mgd -tertiary addition to the Las
lArgenes Municipal Water District's Tapia Facility. The project involved pilot testing; to
optimize filter media design., He has served as the primary advisor to the Camarillo
Sanitary District on, sanitary engineering matters,
k
.. ROBERT C. SIE:MA-K (COMTNUED)
CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Assistant Engineering Specialist: Mr. Siemak was involved in field inspection of domestic
water systems. He evaluates) each system for operational defects, health hazards and
proper monitoring programs} and recommtinded improvement that would enable the water
system to conform to public health standards.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
- Student Engineer: Mir. Siemak assisted in ca:lecting and reviewing water quality data. He
a was involved in conducting a feasibility study, in assisting in the preparation of a project
report on proposed cater reclamation facilities and in operating a portable water
treatment plant to teat periodic high turbid- cy episodes in the Owens Valley supply.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING
Student Engineer: Mr. Siemak was a chaffnman on a street surveying crew.
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation
PUBLICATIONS:
McBridge, D., Siemak, R., Tate, C., and Trussell, R., "Pilot Plant Investigations for
Treatment of Owens River Water," AWWA 96th Annual Conference Proceedings, Paper
14A-3 (May 1977).
Siemak, Robert, "Pilot Plant Investigation and Conclusions Treatment of Owens River
Water," presented at the ASCE Environmental Group, Los Angeles Section Meeting (Nov.
1977)
Siemak, Robert C., Trussell, A., Trussell, R., and Ump'nres, 21., "How to Reduce
Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water," ASCE Civil Engineering Magazine (February 1979).
- Colbaugh, James E., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B, and Woslaw, Joseph A.,
"Monomedia Alternative to Filtration in Advanced Wastewater Treatment. Plants,
Canadian Society of Civil Engineering 1980 annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba (May
1980).
- Colbaugh, James E., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B., and Wojslaw, Joseph A., "Use of
Deep Bed Monomedia as an :alternative to Standard Dual :Media Filtration in Advanced
Wastewater Treatment Plants," ASCE National Conference on Environmental Engineering,
-� New York, New York (July 1980)
Colbaugh, James r., Siemak, Robert C., Uhler, Robert B., and Wojslaw, Joseph .4.,
"Evaluation of Deep Bed Monomedia in a Tertiary Fiitratic,n Application.' Accepted for
presentation at 1981 ASCE Water Forum Conference, San Francisco, California (August
143L).
Sie;.nak, R.C.,, "Tertiary Filtration Design: Practical Design Considerations," WPCF 1983
Annual Conference, Atlantic Georgia (Oct. 1983).
1
A
SECTION 3
'2
PROJECT RELATED EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., was founded in 194.5 and over
the past 41 years has gained extensive experience in the various- disciplines of
water and wastewater engineering. This has involved the design of gravity sewer
pipelines and force mains, pumping stations, and other related facilities. In
y
addition to the firm's experience, members of the proposed project team have had
extensive experience in the design of these types of facilities. A summary of
recent experience for similar projects is presented in this section for your
convenience,
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
,
JMM has designed several hundred miles of major sanitary sewers in diameters up
to 114 inches. One of our larger projects was the $52 million interceptor
sewerage system for metropolitan San Diego, California. This system consists of
'
116,000 feet of 42 to 114-inch diameter interceptor sewers, pumping facilities
(including one of the world's largest wastewater pumping stations), an 80 mgd
wastewater treatment plant, and a 108•-inch diameter ocean outfall. Another
major project was tfie nonreclaimable wastewater collection system designed for
the Chino Bann Municipal Seater District. This project, costing over $12 million,
involved over 30 mikes of pipelines in diamete.s up to 42 inches. Collection
systems can be both Analyzed and a ,signed by ICES SEWER, a computer program
developed by the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory at M.I.T. ICES (Integrated
Civil Engineering System) was the result of a major research and development
effort initiated by M.I.T. in 1964. The system handles both storm and sanitary
networks flowing full or partially full under the influence of gravity.
PUMPING STATIONS
Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have been designed ranging in
capacity from 230 gpm to 250,000 gpm with total connected horsepowers up to
.:,
18,000 HP.. These stations have included all types of pumps, both electric and
natural gas driver units, electrical controls for both local and remote operation:.,,
and telernetering. Our experience includes the world's largest natural gas engine -
driven water pumping station located in Las Vagas, Nevada.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
-i
JMM provides some degree of construction management services for virtually all
facilities designed by JMM. These services have ranged from fast -tracking design
and construction, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work, and
keeping all books and records associated with a project, down to simply providing
occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in
addition; to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process,
monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change orders,
makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large part of the
documentation associated with a project. JMM, is extremely conscious of time
and money constraints and gears its work to stay within the budgets given. JNTM
project engineers assist contractors and operating personnel in achieving design
criteria, especially during plant start-up. Project design engineers periodically
3-1
return to completed projects to ° bserve their operation and assist operating
personnel. Information obtained from these- visits is used to refine subsequent
designs.
a
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
„ J.MM maintains full engineering design- capabilities at its Pasadena Corporate
office. ` :among the engineering and technical disciplines represented are
architectural, civil, electrical, mechanical, structural, communications,
instrumentation and controls and cost estimating, disciplines. It is JZMW. s
philosophy to design functional facilities which provide low operation and
_4 maintenance costs, lowenergyconsumption and high operational flexibility while
controlling construction costs. Emphasis is placed on obtaining high value,
durability and functional efficiency for the cost of construction. These goals are
fulfilled through the utilization of JMM's extensive experience with designs of
many varied facilities.
1
The following pages contain a representative list of major sewer and wastewater
pumping station projects designed, by JMM, manyof which include equipment
similar to that proposed in the City of Huntington Be6& ImDrovements to the
Force Plains and Sewer Pump Stations on Warner Avenue Prt,;• •-t- The projects on
this list reflect the iieptb of d sign experience available at � MM to perform the
necessary work for the City of Huntington Beach in an efficient and cost-
effective manner.
3-2
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF WASTEWATER
COLLECTION PROJECTS
Footage
Diameter
Agency
(feet)
(inches)
Albany, Oregon, City of
8,770
12-14
Alhambra, California,City of
19,000
8-21
Avalon, California, City of
4,000
12
Boulder City, Nevada, City of
16,000
8-10
Canby, Oregon, City of
Z, 320
8-1.0
Castroville County Sanitation .District
15,000'
8-18
Castroville County Sanitation District
3,Onr)
18
Central Weber Sewer Improvement District
Ogden, Utah
18,775
8-18
Chino Basin Municipal Water District
Z10,000
8-42
Clark County, Nevada
125,000
60
Clark County Sanitation District, Nevada.
16,000
18
' Coalville, Utah
47,380
4-18
Cucamonga County Water District
262, 000
8-30
Curitiba, Brazil, City of
75,000
18-81
Del Mar, California, City of
23,000
12-18
Dunsmuir, California, City of
8,000
15
East Salem Sewage & Drainage District
(Marion County, Oregon)
264,000
8-33
Fairfield -Suisun Sewer District, California
40,000
18-36
Farmington, Utah
1,870
8
Florida (Land Development)
108,000
8.24
Gervais, Oregon, City of
10,070
Guyaquil, Ecuador, City of
100,000
8-96
alsey, Oregon, City of
17,750
8-10
v Heber City, Utah
16, 200
8-36
Independence, Oregon, City of
3,570
12
Jefferson, Oregon, City of
Z4,100
8-15
Junction City, Oregon, City of
IZ,000
12
Keizer Sewer District No. 1 (Marion
- County, Oregon)
173,000
8 -Z4
Kennewick, Washington, City of
32,000
12-36
Labish Village Sewer & Drainage District
(Marion County,, Oregon)
8,100
8
Laguna Beach, California, City of
27,000
8-36
Lakepoint Sewer Improvement District,
Lakepoint, Utah
Phase 1
6,760
6-10
Phase 2 _
34,550
4-10
La Habra, California, City of
17,000
8-24
- Las Vegas, Nevada (Land Development)
105,000
8`-12
Las Vegas, Nevada, City of
23,475
4Z-54
,w
a
REPRESENTAI71YE LIST OF WASTEWATER
COLLECTION PROJECTS
-�
(continuPA)
Footage
Diameter
v
Agency
(feet)
(inches)
Los Angeles, California, City of
9,000
48-69
-'
Maple Hills Development, Bountiful, Utah
9,,120
8
�^
Mendocino City: Community Services District
30,.000
6-15
fidway Sanitation District, Midway, Utah
79,880-
8-15
Missoula, Montana, City of
72,300
8-36
Monmouth, Oregon, City of
10,000
12
Ogden, Utah
8-90
Norco, California, City of
4,000
8
Pajaro County Sanitation District
65,000
8-14
Pomona Valley, MWD
25,000
26
Ramona Sanitation District
34,000
1Z-Z1
'
Rancho California WD
30,000
6-1Z
Reedy Creeklmprovemont Iistrict, Florida
56,000
12-18
Regional Highway Commission, Nevada
400
51
Russian River County Sanitation D*:strict
60,000
6-Z_
Salem, Oregon, City of
290,000
6-30
San Diego, California, City of
116 000
4Z-114
Santa Ana Watershed Project
57,000
27-48
Santa Cruz County Sanitation District
4Z,000
Z4-36
'
Sievra Madre, California, City of
22,000
6-12
Skagway, Alaska,: City of
15,500
8-10
South Davis County Sewer Improvement
District, Bountiful, Utah
100 MH6E
8-48
South Laguna Sanitary District
33,000
!
6-18
South Ogden, Utah
40th Street
1,851
8
Main Point
4,000
8-10
Adams Ave.
860
8
Sweetwater, Florida, City of
11,000
8-24
Sweetwater Park, Utah
29,700
8
U.S. Navy, Camp Pendleton.
15,"0
16
U.S. Navy, Travis Air Force Base
13,000
IZ-21
Ventura County, North Coast
100,000
l -8
Washington Terrace, Utah
12, 000
36
- ,
Wendover, Utah
8,110
1Z
West. Jordan, Utah
2,37Z
10
Winters, California City of
14,000
14
Woodburn,, Oregon, City of
Z6,700
8-36
w,
e
,
a
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS
PUMPS
CLIE14T
Type
No.
Design_
Design
(fut.)
hp
gpm
Avalon - Sewage
Vert
Z
30
3,600
Goleta Sanitary District - Sewage
V'.T.
Z
90
6,000
Ontario - Sewage
V.T.
2(Z)
105
3,500
•
Ontario - Magnolia Ave. Sewage P.S.
Vert
2_
23
12,000
San Diego No. Z - Sewage
Vert
4 (4)
13,500
Z50', 000
_
San Diego No. 1 - Sewage
Vern
3(3)
3,700
170-,000
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage A
Vert
Z
60
1,700
Santa Cruz. CSD - Sewage B-
Vert
3
90
5,000
R t
Santa Cruz CSD - Sewage C
Vert
3
338
5,000
y
Santa Cruz. CSD - Sewage D
Vert
3
338
8,000
Notes:
Design Ar and design gpm includes future pumps,
( ) indicates number of future pumps
to be installed
V.T. = Verti-al Turbine
Vert = Vei,tical Centrifugal
v
a
,ti
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSERVICES CLIENTS
Alhambra, City of, California
Baldwinsville, New York, Brewery
Buena Park, City of, California
Camarillo Sanitary District, California
Carmel Saaitax - District, C �ornia
Ca,titroville County Sanitation District, California
Y
Central. Utah ffater Conservancy District
Chino Basin :Municipal Water District, California
Contra Costa County 'Water District, California
a
Corona, City of California'
Cucamonga County Water District, California
Del liar, City of, California
"Escondido, Cit;r of, California
Fairfield -Suisun Sewer District, California
Folsom, City of, California
Directorate General Housing, Building, Planning and Urban Development, Jakarta,
Indonesia
Gillette, Wyoming, City of
Goleta County eater District, Califoi-ia
Hampton Roads Sanitation District, Virginia
Helix Water District, California
ltvine Ranch Water District
Kennewick, City of, Washington
REPRESENTATIVE LISTOF
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLIENTS
(Continued)
Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District, California
Leis Lomas-Pa;aro, Monterey County Department of Public Works, California
Las Vegas galley Water District; Nevada
Livermore, City of, California
Mandan, City of, North Dakota
Maui, County of, Hawaii
Mendocino City Community Services District, California
Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System iyliYSS), %danila, Philippines
Missoula, City of, Montana
Mountain Home, City af, Idaho
North Lauderdale, City of, Florida
Oak View Sanitary District, California
Oceanside, City of, California
Palm Springs, City of, California
v Rancho California 'Hater District, California
Rohnert Park, City of, California
San Buenaventura, City of, California
r
San. Gabriel Valley :-lunicipal Water District, California
Santa Ana Watershed, Project .authority, California
_ Sonoma, County of, California
_• South Valley Wat,-r Reclamation Facility Board, Utah
State Water Resources Control Board, Santa Ana Region, California
t, a
(
Stockton East Water District, California
a Sunkist Growers, Inc., Coorona California
Thousand Oaks, City of, California
s.
t
.� REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF
r ,f
CONSTRUCTION M .NAGEMENT SERVICES CLIENT
jContinued)
Twin, Falls, City of, Idaho
7
Ventura County Public Works Agency, California
Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority, California
W „tsonville, City of, California
r
;e''v
--
CONSTR :CI'ION .MANAGE-MEN7 FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY
JkN1ES 5t. `tON7GONtERY, CONSULTDiG ENGINEERS, INC.
ON PIPELINES, PUMPING STATIONS AND RESERVOIRS
X
y
'4.kNIE OF CLIENT
—
—
YA,titEGFPROTECT
earls. -Ina ''Xarerstced. Project kuthonty. r
-
'uversrile, Caldarnn O 0
• f •
•ta 4
t
San Via Regional Interceptor —
Reach I'r"
! a
'c
City ^ai Fairteld California
Farfield- Suisun interceptors jnd 0 • • • - i •
'0;
• •
Pumping Stations '
s
}
Chino Barn .tuntapalWater Disttre«
j
Caamonga, California. X.
Chino Basin Municipat'Nurr District • 0 O • 0
•
0 i 0
mtercepton and. Pumping. Stations
p
City if Del `.tar. California. «
Del Mgr Collection Sewers • • ld /♦ •
•
'
Mendoctno City Communtty Services'
District, Mendocino, Caufornta is; ! •. - 0 O •' i
0.
Mendocino Sever Collection Svstem ' a
City of Oceanside, California
Oceanside Water Development • <� ', • • •
•
Pro,
am
gr ;
I
Cucamonga County Water District, f 1
i
Cucamonga, California ; `
Cucamonga Pipelines and. Pumping ' 0 - 0. i i 9. 0
0
i
stations o
;
s
a i
t
.San Gabriel Valley 14urueipal Water
District, San Gabriel, Californu #p !; 1 f 0 0
0
0 0
�.
i Devil'Canyon-:�susa Pipeline
444 I I
i
-
} City of Corona. Caltfornw
t Corona Storage Facilities • • d 0 0 0
•
0 0
t
CONSTRLI(.TIO�1( yiAV. GENIEVT Fi VCTIONS PERFORMED BY
JAMESM NIOs`1"IGOME&...
CONSULTINGENGINEERS. INC.
OIN PIPELINES.
PUMPING STATIONS AND RESERVOIRS
(CONTINUED)
VASE OFCLIENT
-
_
va}tE0FPF01E:-T
FYorba Lt:da +'tr�.v •.1;a. :: -.c:,
-.
Yorb3 tinda, cakfov „ W
p t ! • !
• i •
Yoroy, +i ';anoxut , ar•,
i
Storagz
+ Las ve�Sa3 t.' iYtev tVatet .,.--rict.. .
Lai I esai ti is
Las V rgs 4 r3ev N uer Juirict
i r', •
• •
Ploeiin- c.^Fs: , ltttsnns and
i
Goleta County Water District, Goleta
Caltf3
LN It to L-Y]trny 'S'atCr District
! •
!
+ Pipeline and. Pumping •>nnon
a
Cityaf Ventura. California
e Ventura Pipelines, Pumping Station.
! ! V ! i -
• • •
and. R.eser�oir
1 i
F
t I
iCity aC Buena Park Caltfornia
1
,
Buena Park Pipelines and Reservoir •
! � A
! �
L-nne Ranch Braver Dutner. Irvme,
i
l
f t
Californu •
•
l i • •
q
! l
§ lrvtne Ranch'Nater District Pipeitnes.
1
i
t and Resnrvols
1
i
San Marcos County Water District. San
e Mantis. California ; !
. � I a • ®
! t ,`
Richland Interceptor
: (
:
+ i
t
Rancho :allfornia water Destnct
Tenteeuly California •
! C t • •. •
• !
i Rancho California Water Distinct
}
� Pipeiinea
1
a
t
�
i
yy
SECTION 4
FEE SCHEDULE
d
Consulting services are provided in accordance with the Schedule of Fees and
7
Conditions (CAI-SC(11/85)), a copy of which is included in this section. Based on
a
our understanding of the engineering services to be provided in Section 1-Scope of
Work, the following outlines our Fee Schedules
FEE SCHEDULE
The fee- services described in Section 1-Scope of Work, Task A, Preliminary
Design Phase would be accomplished for a feenotto exceed "$7,400.
The fee for services described in Section I -Scope of Work, Task B, Design Phase
would be accomplished fora fee not to exceed $17,100.
ti
The fee for services described in Section 1-Scope of Work, Task C, Construction
Support Phase would be accomplished for a fee not to exceed $2,800.
"
The fee for services described in Task A. Preliminary Design Phase, includes the
following subcontracted specialized consulting engineering services:
.,
Geotechnical Investigations
a
The total not to exceed fee for Tasks A, B, and C would be: �27,300.111
~
A bt-a'kdown of estimated manhours and extenuated costs for individual tasks
described in Section 1-Scope of Work is shown on the following pages in this
section for your convenience.
.
4<1
Fes Schedule
,..
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND
COST OF SERVICES
Consulting Engineering Services
—
Task A - Preliminary
Design Phase
Estimated
Estimated
Subtask
1y1anhours Subcontractors
Cost
1
16
920
a�
2
42 1,500 ,
3,980
3
4
190
4
'6
290
5
2
410
6
4
300
7
15
1,110
Subtotal for Task A
$7,200
Printing & Reproduction
100
Travei and .Miscellaneous
100
Total for Task A
$7,400
i
4-2
i
=r
Fee Schedule
x
..
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND
COST OF SERVICES
i
L
Consulting Engineering Services
Task B -- Design
Phase
Estimated
Estimated
..
Subtask
blanhours Subcontractors
Cost
1
26
1,580
2
197
_8,240
3
71
3,730
4
60
3,000
5
3
150
r
Subtotal for Task B
$16,700
Printing &- Repr-- :-,tion
150
`
Travel and Miscellaneous
250
Total for Task B
$17,100
b
-
4-3
.a
t
1
Fee Schedule
ESTIMATED MANHOIIRS AND
COST OF SERVICES
t
r
Consulting Engineering Services
a
Task C - Construction. Support Phase
r-
Estimated
Estimated
Subtask Manhours Subcontractors
Cost
a
1 30
1,690
2 18
480
!
3 6
530°
Subtotal for Task C
$2, 700
a
Printing & Reproduction
50
Travel and Miscellaneous
50
1
Total for Task C
$2,800
3
b
4-4
y9y
F
i
k
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CONR''a1ONs'
r` James ML Montgomery, Conasltin, r:ngineers. Inc.
A. -FEESAND PAYMENT
1, The fee for services will be based on salxr f cost plus 140 percent of saidsalary torts. 'Vhen field engineering services are to be.
performed by field personnel, the fee will be salary cost plus 130 percunt. Salary cost is the cost of salaries (including sick leave,,
vacation, holiday and incentive pay) of personnel for time d"-ctly chargeable to the project/plus unemployment, excise# and payroll
taxes; contributions for social security, employment compensation insurance, retirement, medical, and insurance benefits and for the
purpose of this project, salary costs are defined as 1.3 times actual payroll. Non -salary expenses directly attributable to the project like
(1) living and traveling expenses of employees when away from the home office an business connected with the project, (Z) identifiable
communication expenses, i3) identifiable drafrmg and stenographic supplies and expenses, and (4) identifiable reproduction costs
applicable to the work will be charged at actual cost plus 15 percent services charge. Charges for the use of computers, word processors
and aswctated equipment and services will be in accordance with the published schedule of fees to effect at the time the charges are
incurred. Charges for services provided by Moutgomery's approved water quality laboratory -mill be in accordance with the published
laboratory fee,schedule in effect at the time the services are furnished.
t..
Z. The fee for Outside Services will be at actual cost phis 15 percent of actual cost to cover overhead and administration.
}- 3. Payment shall be due within 30 days after date of monthlyinvoice describing: the work performed and expenses incurred during, the
preceding month
v
4. In order to defray .marrying charges resulting from delayed payments, siiaple interest at the rate of eighteen percent (IM) per
annum:(.but not exceeding the maximum rate. allowed by law) will be added to the unpaid balance of: each invoice. The interest period
shall commence 30 daysafter date of original invoice and shall terminate apon: date of. payment. Payments will be first credited to
interest and then to principal. No interest charge will be added during the initial 30-day period following date of invoice.
F COMMENCEMENT OF WORK
the work -mill be co nmenced immediately upon receipt of notice to proceed. If after commencement of work the project is delayed for
any season. beyondthecontrol. of Montgomery for more than 30 days, the terms and conditions contained herein are subject to revision.
C. :MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
1. HOOKS OF ACCOUNT. Montgomery' mill matntaui books and accounts -af paymil casts, travel, subsistence, field and incidental
sr azpenses. Said books: will be available at all reasonable times for examination by the owner at the Corporate office of Montgomery.
Z. INSURANCEiINDEM NIFICATION
a
ta) Montgomery wtll maintain insurance as wall protect the client from claima under the Worker's Compensation Laws and from
as General Liability and Automobile claims for bodily rnjury, or death, or property damage which may arise from the negligent
performance by its employees in the functions and services required under this Agreement.
(b) Montgomery warrants that iz is skilled in the profetaional calling necessary to the services and duties proposed to be performed
i� and Lhat it shall perform suchservices and duties in conformance to and consistent with the :standards generally recognized as being
employed by professionals of J`,SM's caliber in the same locality and to that end IMM agrees to indemnify and Bold harmless Owner,
im officers and employees from and against any and all liability claims, suits, loss, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or
( resulting from any negligent act+ error or amission of JAM, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors in the performance of
d ti:eir services and duties hereunder. Further to assure the Owner that such standard will be maintained' and to protect thy. Owner
from any negligent acts, error or omission on the part of JMM, JMM maintains Professional Liability insurance in the account of
$5,000.000. The total aggregate of `Aontgomery'3 professional liability, however, to all parties related to this Agreement shall not
exceed 110,000 or the amount of Montgomery's fee for each phase o! the. Agreement
(c) Although U.e insurance as stated is currently in effect, due to the instability of the world insurance market, It is recognized
that on periodic negotiation of policy renewals, it may not be possible to maintain the exact insurances coverage required under the
terms of this agreement. In such event, Montgomery will use its best efforts,.to obtain insurance coverage that is reasonably
available and most nearly equivalent to the insurance coverage herein described.
(d) in consideration of the unavailability of professional liability insurance for services Involving or relating to hazardous waste
elemer.':s of ;his agreement, if applicable, or :the removal or encapsulation of asbestos, it is further agreed that the Owner shall
indemnify and hold harmless Ecgmeer and their consultants agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and
expenses, direct and indirect, or consequential damages, tncWtng but sot limited to fees and charges of attorneys and court and
arbitration costs, ari lag out of or resulting from the performance of the work by Engineer, or claims against Engineer arising from
the work of others, r,-..ited to hazardous waatc or asbestos activity.
The above indemnification provision extends to claims against Engineer which arise out of, are related to, or are based upon, the
dispersal, discharge, escape, release or saturation of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, ackla, alkalis, toxic chemicals, Liquids, gases or any
other, material m tant, contaminant or pollutant in or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upon, in or into the surface or subsurface
(a) soil, (b) water or watercourses, tc) objects, or (d) any tangible or intangible matter, wfiether sudden or nut.
(e) ilotw(ihstanding any provisions in this agreement to the contrary, If thi project involves construe ion as that term is generally
understood, and the En&eer does not provide E.agineering Services daring construction including on -site monitoring,, site visits, shop
drawing review, design clartfleattons, etc., the Owner agrees to mdemntfy and hold harmless the ;Engineer from any and all liability
arising outof this project or Agreement.:
CAI -SC (11185)
r
f.
^r
'-a
3. DOCUMENTS
,,. (a)All tracings, survey notes, and other original documents as instruments of service are and shall remain.. the property of
Montgomery,except whereby taw or precedent these documents become public property. Theclientagreesto hold harmless,.
indemnify and defend Montgomery against all damages, claims, expenses: and losses arising outof any reuse of. the plans and. r
specifications without. the ;writtenauthorization of Montgomery..
(b) All computer programs, software and other like data developed during the course of the project„ unless specifically developed
for the client, are and shall remain the sole property of Montgomery.
4 (c) Montgomery's liability to client for any computer programs, software products or related data furnished hereunder is limited
solely tothe correctionof residual, errors, minor maintenance, or update as. agreed.. Montgomery makes no warranties of any
kind, including any implied warranty of mercb3.ntabtlity or n( fitness for any partic:'lar purpose or againi, infringement, with
respect to computer programs, software products,. rest. -i t:nta,technical information or technical assistance provided by
Montgomery under this Agreement. In no event slta<,i 'S:intgomery, its officers, aZents or employees be liable under or in
connection with this Agreement under any theory of tort, contract, strict liability, negligence, or other Legal or equitable
theory for incidental or consequential damages relating to any computer programs, software products or related data furnished
hereunder.
4. _ TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT. If any portion of the work is terminated or abandoned by the owner then the provisions of this
Schedule of Fees and. Conditions in regard to compensation and payment shall apply insofar as possible to that portion of the work, not
terminated or abandoned.. If said termination occurs .prior to completion of any phase of the project, the fee for services performed.
during' such phase shall be based on Montgomery's reasonAble estimate oc the portion of such phase completed prior to said termination,
plus a reasonable amount to reimburse Montgomery for-arminatiun costs.
5. REVISION OF TERMS. If notice. to proceed in delayed for any :reason beyond, 60 days, the .terms and conditions contained in this. !!
schedule are subject to revision. 1
6. ATTORNEY'S FEES. If either party becomes involved in litigation arising out of th"% contract or the performance thereof, the court
in suchlitigation shall award reasonable costs and.expenses, including att.orney's fees to the party justly entitled thereto. In awarding,.
attorney's fees, the court ,shall not be bound by any court fee schedule, but shall, if it is in the interest of justice to do so, award the
full amount of costs, expenses and_attornev's fees paid or incurred in good faith.
1. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. All of the terms, conditions and provisions hereof stall inure to the benefit of and be binding, upon the
parties hereto and their respective successors and .signs provided, however, that no assignment of the contrac: ?SaYI be made without
writtenconsent of the parties to the. agreement..
8. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES. Estimate. of cost: for the facilities considered and designed under this. Agreement are prepared by
'w Mon?,Vcrue• through exercise of its
� _y g experience and judgement in applying presently available cost data, but.. it is recognized that
Montgomery his no control over cost of labor and matdriab, or over the Contractor's met'nods of determining prices, or over competitive
'- btddma prdcedures, market conditions, and unkno-im field conditions so that it cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or the
project cons"ction costs rill not vary from its cost est.mates.
T
9. S1Tti VISITS. Visits to the construction site and observations made by Montgomery as part a` Constriction. Management Services_
updrr this Agreement shall not make Montgomery responsible for, nor relieve the constructioc contractor,.4 of the obligation to conduct
i comprehensive monitoring of the work sufficient to ensure conformance with the intent of the Contract Documents, and shall not make
A:ontgt4. M responsible for, nor relieve the Construction contrActor(s) of the full responsibility for all construction means methods,
techviquei, sequences, and procedures necessary for coorditnating and. completing all portions of the work under the construction
tonnrAz't(r) ands for allmisty precautions incidental thereto.. Such visits by Montgomery are not to be construed as part of the..
monitoring duties of the on-s to monitoring p;•rsonnel defined. below.
10. 017-5ITE MQ1YiIiOr11,C. 'When Montgomery provides on -site monitoring personnel as a part of Construction Management Services
under this Agreemr ity the tut -site monitoring personnel wilt make reasonable efforts to guard the client against defects and deficiencies
in the cork of the tontrar .-:{W and to help determine if the provisions of the Contract Documents are being fulfilled. 'Their day -today
monitoring will not yewevar, cause Montgomery to be •esponsible for those duties and which belong to the construction
contractors) and which i"iciude, but are .tot limited to, full re.ponsibdity for the means, metho.:,. Techniques, sequences and progress of
construction and the aai.riy precautions incidental thereto and for performing. theconstruction workin accordance with the wntract..
Documents.
CAl-SC (l1/S51
_f5/1
PRODUCEq
H
=.
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS :UPON THE CERTIFICATE. HOLDER. THIS. CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND.
EMETT dL CHANDLER LOS ANGELES, INC.
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW,
4 111135 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, 5TH FLOOR
I LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
TEL NO., (213) 4"-333i
TEtoc NO- 69-1260
COMPANY A
LETTER International 71' suiance Co.
COMPANY V
LETTER 9 Hartford Insurance Co.
_
INSURED --
COMPANY
LETTER Ha_Y _fordIi1SL1r3TIGe CO .
" Jams M. M nt y onsultin
iEngineers, Inc.y t Cg
r
COMPANY p
LETTER International Insurance Co.
250 N. " dlson Aire.
Pasadena, Ca. 51101 {
-s-
COMPANY
LETTER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OFINSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVEBEEN ISSUEOTO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REC`JIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE!NSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALLTHE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDf-
- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
..O
� r �t T-',T
y r xPgi., ,
LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER N YtS".:C"1',
A-"e MF4 a..'vV'
E•L "`
AGGREGF•TE
L
GENERAL
LIABILITY.
BODILY
CM+IPR&ENSIVE FOPW
I
t�uUAY
S
$
PREMISES+OPERA 1055
UNC'Ea &O
540-683634-F § 8/31/85 8/31/86
PeCPGP7Y
OAMACE
S
$
_
EX PL6 =�?➢5E eiA'," RO
C'i
X
PROOUCTSLOMP'_E'EO OPERATiOf S
ti
CDNTRA�~Tuu
I
pCOt!BINEn
11000
511000*
X
11,0E?EtiGE'IT C0N'RA0'ORS
ti
X
BROAD FORM PROPERTY SAMAGE
X
PERSONAL GNJURY
* i {
S250,000 SIR t
PERSONAL INJURY
t
S
1,000
I
AUTOMOBILE
UABIUTY
3
x
vw AUTO
xax,
}{
ALL PxNED 4UTOS yP.IV PASS !
72UUM4660
I
2/2/86 1 2/2/87
r
.�
I
X
ALL OWNED AUTOS ? pAss�7
i
?s+E
S
X
HIRE) AUTOS
i
I
c
x
NON-0WNED AUTOS
PBOPER7Y
1 OMAAGE
�4
j
WAGE LIABILITY
I
j
I
B� a PD
COM9INED
S1
_
t000
�
!
EXCESS UAf IUTY
UMBRELLA FORM
1
I 111
B+ a PO
COMBINED v�
`
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA F0R!A
t.
1
STATUTOnY
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
72WvU-C<4661
5/1/86 5Jl/87
!EACH ACC:I ENT)
AND.
$ ,01SEASE POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
II
500 (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE
c
D
'OTHER
Professional Liabili
524-065-424-4
8/31/65
8/31/86
$5,000*� � OccuriceJa
-14 :)ESCRIPTiODt OF OPERATIOP&'LOCAT)ONSVEH CtE-'SPECIAL ITEMS , 000 t 000 SIR
Such assurance as is afforded by policies insured by caTpanies ASB (#540-C-,6 a
834-6 5 ,72WBM'46 l'
gha11 also apply to the City Of Huntingtm Beach as an additional insured, but soley as
City of Huntington Beach SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED, POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX-
PIRATT DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY =WILL ENOEAVOR TO
City Hall MAIL lU DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFrCATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
mt]1Zg�.cn, Beach, Ca. LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE HQOBLIGATION OR LIABR ITY
OF ANY KIND WON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
v
m
t
r
COMPANY BACKGROUND AND MAJOR C.kPABa=S
COMPANY 13ACKGROUND
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Lnc. was established in 1945.
Corporate and Southwest Regional offices are located in Pasadena, California,
with branch offices located in Phoenix, Arizona; Irvine, and I:a Jolla, California;
Ft. Lauderdale and Gainesville, Florida; Boise, Idaho; New Orleans, Louisiana;
Las Vegas, Nevada; Portland, Oregon; Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle,
Washington; Laramie, Wyoming; and regional offices in Walnut Creek, California,
Denver, Colorado, and Reston, Virginia (Washington, D.C. area). The firm has
overseas offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Manila, Philippines; Sydney, Australia;
C airo, Egypt; and Gedaref, Sudan. The staff consists of over 600 employees
including ZZ5 reoistAred professional engineers; 163 have post -graduate degrees
in civil and sanitary engineering. Thirty-seven members of the staff are
diplomates of the A_-Perican Academy of Environmental Engineers.
Since its astablisbaient, the firm has acquired broad experience and expertise in
the field of civil and sanitary eauineering. To support its basic eng.zeering
capability, the firrn has its own in-house services in the disciplines of
mechanical, structural, electrical, environmental, architectural, geological and
chemical engineering.. Field support services include surveying and construction
d- supervision. In addition, the firm has its own EPA certified water quality
laboratory and VA:{-11,'730 computer systein.
Within the engineering disciplines, primary emphasis is placed on planning,
design, preparation of plans and specifications, and constructior inspection. The
following is a partial summary of water and wastewater projects .which have
been completed by the firm.
Wastewater and Industrial 'dater Treatment Plant Designs . 105
Major Pipeline Designs ...... ....... ..... Over 4600 mikes
Ocean Outfall Designs ........ ... .. 17
4iasttr Plans, Feasibility Studies, and
Project Reports (water supply and
wa astvater) ....... 330
Water Treatment Plant Designs .......................... 9Z
Pumping Station Designs .. . .. Z15
Storm Drain Designs ................ .... .. 170
Reservoir Desioas ...................... ............... Z10
;Pater Well Designs .. •Z10
Rate and F nancia Analysis Studies .. 77
Environmental Impact Studies ... 60
Automatic Control. and Telemetering ... ............ 68
Facility Plans ............ .................... .,........ 82'
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
In the past thirty-five years, wa have planned. designed, and inspected construc-
tion of over 52.0 billion in xater and wastewater projects for over 1.300 separate'
clients.
MAJOR CAPABILITIES
1. Water Treatment Plants. James M. Montgomery. Consulting ,Engineers,
Inc„ has a long history in the development of water treatment techniques
l :and is recognized nationally as a lea&.-r in the field. The staff has prepared
studies and desigis for over bb water treatment plants ranging in capacity
from 1.0 to 750 angd. Our firm is associated Kith most of the advances in
the field of water treatment. Innovations which have been incorporated in
facilities we have designed include pumped blenders (flash mixing), tapered
hydraulic flocculation, designed compartmentalization, vacuum sludge
removal, backwash conditioning, simplified filter controls. high: -rate filtra-
tion, direct filtration, air lift backwashing, ion exchange, and reverse
oL aosis. In ad ition, the firm offers extensive services relative to pre -
design studi Pi'ot facilities for pre-treatment, ozonation, chemical
feeding, filtration, and continuous monitoring are available for on -site
investigations. Jlvi'�t initiated particle count monitoring in addition to the
monitoring of turbidity and other physical and chemical parameters.
Z. Master Plans and Feagibility Studies. Over 321 master plans and feasibility
reports for water, wastewater, storm drainage, and industrial waste systems
have been prepared by the firm. Many of the wafer system master plans and,
j feasibility stu4irs included detailed investigations of alternative sources of
supply, management, financial, economic, and technical s,;�.uidness analyses.
as well as the preparation of preliminary plans, specifications, and cost
estimates. Ir addition, ,i%W has prepared numerous other engineering
studies. investigations, a --id reports on related subjects such as grou:.d water
development, special water and wastewater treatment problems, reservoirs.
treatment plants, distribution systems, corrosion, water rates, appraisals,
etc. Many of our engineering studies contain complete financial 'recom-
mendations along with management techniques.
_ 3, Wastewater Facilities Plznning (Z-b-1. JMhi has prepaared over 19 EPA 301
grant program reports, 'many of which involve dAtailed ar.alysis ct existing,
t treat Lent facilities with recommendatiors for •�pgradhig modifications and
ecparsion. The staff is well -versed in the ,,quirements of the EPA 201
Grant Program. y
These facilities have ranged in size from lrtss than 100,000 gall-)ns per day to
over 90 milliou gallon.3 per day. The processes utilized have included abi
types of primary, secondary, and advanced waste treatment. Many of the
projects hav t involved reclamation of th_ effluent for industrial, agri-
cultural, and recreational uses. JIMM, has unique capa:-ilities in evaluating
existing treatment facilities for increased performance and/or expansion
throng., its experienced staff of Sanitary engineers a`,d treatment pl?nt
operators; this is best indicated by the selection of ;flit by the Enviro,
mental Protection Agency to perform the;r post-construc'_ion evaluation of
treatment performance in Nevada2nc1 California. Because of our
1
r
Como, Background and Major con.i Capabilit' ti .nued)
experience in planning, design, cost estimating, financing, and operation of
all types of treatment facilities, 7MM has 'the backgroundto providt
realistic water quality planning.
Q
Several facility plans recently completed or currently being prepared
concern large metropolitan areas involving consolidation of several systems,
abandoning certain existing facilities, evaluating alternative advanced waste
treatment processes, and developing the imstitutional/financial solutions.
Included have been the regional systems for San Diego, Californian and Clark
"
County, Nevada. Since -the enactment, of PL 92-500 in 197Z. JM\4 has
prepared 'twenty-eight facility plans for wastewater facilities in conform-
{
1.
ance with the provisions of the Act.
4., Areawide Water Quality Management (208 and: 303e). JM. M, has provided
consulting services for a number of agencies responsible for areawide water
"
quality planning. This experience includes 303(e) river basic plans and 208
plans (completed and active) as authorized by PL 92-500 and a number of
federally financed special management plans. To date, we have participated
in twelve .08 studies.,
Methods of conserving and safely utilizing natural resources are also a major
part of this planning effort as is defining opportunities for environmental
eniancement. As a part of these management plans, an evaluation is
conducted of ionpoint waste sources, waste quantities, and the effect upon
the planning area. Included in this evaluation are municipal wasteloads,
facility evaluations, agricultural irrigation return flow wasteloads, solid
wa-te disposal leachates, urban and rural runoff wasteloads, and nonpoint
+
wastes from such industries as logging, mining, and chemicals. Typical
requirements of a 208 project may include the following considerations:_
waste treatment. :collection and disposal; in-strea.m management; land use:
monitoring -and intergovernmental programs. The thrust of the 'proposed
'
constraints involve (1) minimizing the adverse water quality impacts from
construction runoff and urbanization; (2) defining viable guidelines for
optimizing the overall facilities servicing future gk:owth patterns; (3) stream
s
management policies (includng low flow augmentation); (4) protection of
sensitive soil/slope and water -influence areas; (5) performance criteria for
wastewater collection. treatment, and disposal; and (b) assuring the co,7.rdin-
t
ation of public and private programs: that affect water quality.
Work in thss area covers a wide variety of disciplines and re3ponsibilities
from very technical aspects, of waste management control to overall
'
contract management and program administration. Among the projects
Currently underway or recently completed .are water quality, land capability,
and ground water studies for the Flathead Drainage 208 Agency in Kalispell,'
A
Montana; a watershed management study for the city of Ashland,
Oregon/Rogue Valley Council of Governments; an industrial waste analysis
for the Mid -Willamette Council of Governments; .a study, of mining, silvi-
culture, and construction -generated nonpoint waster, for the Mid
Yellowstone Areawidc Planning Organization in Billings, Ito _tana; eight,
preliminary community wastewater facilities stud us for Panhandle Planning'
a
and Development Council, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; the evaluation of effluent
t
t
Comps ackground and Maior Capabilities ontinued)
disposal =ternatives for the Sussex County, Delaware, Planning Authority;
and an overall program responsibility and t-ntract administration for the
Regional Intergovernmental. Council at Charleston, West Virginia.
5. Wastewater Collection System. We have designed several hundred miles of
major sanitary sewers in diameters up to 114 inches. One of our larger
projects was the $52 million interceptor sewerage systetn for metropolitan
San Diego, California. This system consists of 116,000 feet"of 42- to 114-inch
diameter interceptor sewers., pumping facilities (including one of the world's
largest wastewater pumping Stations), an 80 mgd wastewater treatment
plant, and a 108-inch diameter ocean outfall. Anotber major project was the
non -reclaimable wastewater collection system designed for the Chino Basin
Municipal Water District. This project, c fisting ov-2r 51Z million, involved
over 30 miles of pipelines in diameters up to 42 inches. Collection systems
can be both analyzed and designed by ICES SEWER, a computer program
developed by the Civil Engineering SystPrns haboratory at M.I.T. ICES
xLaLcgrat,�il ^tw?; R 4 ,"ring System) was the result of a major research and
development effort initiated by M,I.T. in 1964. The system handles both
storm and sanitary networks flowing full or partially full under the influence
of gravity.
A
6. Wastewater and Industrial Waste Treatment. Our firm has been active in
wastewater treatment and reclamation for more than 2= years. We have
designed 105 wastewater and industrial waste treatme:.t plants ranging in
l
capacity from 0.5 to 90 mgd. Our designs have included primary treatment.
i
biological secondary treatment, and tertiary treatment involving a variety
f unit operations including alum coagulation. multi -media filtration, carbon
adsorption, ion exchange, electrodialysis, and reverse osmosis. In a number
of projects, wastewater is reclaimed for industrial, agricultural, or recrea-
tional reuse. A recent project involved pilot plant testing and prototype
design for a pure oxygen activated sludge plant to oxidize a high-stren-th
industrial -waste containing approximately 10,000 rL g/l $OD to a stable
effluent.
7. Ocean OutfaIls. Engineering studies and designs have been completed for 17
ocean wastewater outfalis. The outfalls range in capacity from 0.7 to 300
_
mgd and vary in diameter from 12 to 108 inches These designs were
preceded by detailed oceanographic studies and computerized hydraulic
i
analysis. In addition to our in-house capabilities n estuarial and oceano-
graphic evaj,ation, the firm also mairlains a close association with recog-
nized authorities in the fields of marine biology and ocTanographic investi-
gation and services.. WhNn required, these specialists ,are added to the
project team for specialized research or consultation regarding outfall study
a
and design.
8. Water Transmission ane Distribution Systems. We have designed numerous
major pipeline systems. 'These designs include more than 3,785 miles of
pipelines in diameters Lp to 14-,, inches and installations under the most
adverse conditions of surface congestion, underground utilities, rugged
terrain, and unstable and corrk:)sive soils. Designs have included open trench,
tunnel, jacking, submarine, and other types of installations. For analysis of
`Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
complex distribution systems, we utilize our own network program and in-
house compu�.sr facility. Our staff has specialized knowledge and exper-
ience in corrosion and corrosion control and actively -)anticipates in corro-
sion research and seminars.
9.
Federal and StateLoana and Grants. James M. Montgomery, Consulting
Engineers. Inc., has had extensive experience in preparing, applications and
assisting clients with obtainin- loans and grams from state and federal
agencies. Federal grants and loans have come primarily from the 'Depart-
ment of housing, and Urban. Development and the Environmental Protection
Agency. Thy firm has assisted over 60 clients in obtaining over S125 million
in governmental assurance programs.
10.
Water Storage Facilities. Over 183 reservoirs have been designed by the
firm, ranging from a 20,000-ga-'lon steel tank to a 1 billion gallon asphaltic -
lined open reservoir with a compacted earth--mbankment._ Reservoir
designs have included reinforced concrete, prestressee concrete, precast
!
concrete arch -panel, and steel construction for buried, partially -buried,
ground -level, and elevated strictures. The firm also designed the
64.400,000-,gallon; 40-foot deep reinforced concrete Dunsmuir Reservoir in
Oakland. California. This storage facility is the largeat reservoir of its type
in the united States aixd is also the deepest buried reservoir of large size in
the country. James M., Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. was awarded
an Engineering EXcLIlence Award in 1972 by the Consulting Engineers
Council of the United StatEy for the design of the -19.3-million-gallor,
Greystone Reservoir for the city of Beverly Hills, California.
11.
Pumping Stations. Over 209 water and wastewater pumping stations have
been designed ranging in capacity from 4.3 gem to 250,000 gpm with total
connected horsepowers up to 18,000 HP. T .e stations have included all
types of pumps, both electric and natural gas dr-ver units, electrical
controls for both local and remote operations, and t,lemetering. Our
experience includes the world's largest natural gas eng°ne-driven water
pumping station located in Las Vegas, Nevada..
17-
Automatic Proct---- Control and T'elrmetry. Modern water and wastewater
transmission, storage, distribution.. and treatment systeras require automa-
tion to facilitate efficient operation, optimization„ and to alJw ease of
expansion.
JMM utilizes state-of-the-art control technology and includes the latest
field -proven egvipment approslches it the configuration of water and waste-
.
water treatment systems. JM 1's staff of elecu-ical and control system
engineers is experienced in all aspects of automated control of a wide range
of treatment processes as well as data acquisition, computer -based control,'-
and data handling. Our in -plant designs reflect the depth of experience
required to .2ndgrstand and control complex process interrelationships and to
prGvide ar. operator -oriented, approach to centralized 'control of these
processes. A thorough knowledge of the latest treatment process equipment
is utilized by the engineers tv apply control concepts effectively.
i
Company Background and Major Capabilities (contirk— l
In addition to hundreds of in -plant automation applications, JMM has
provided study, design and support engineering service3, and start-up related
to telemetry systems for over 20 years with more than 51 separate clients
worldwide. Telemetry system applications include, various aspects of water
transmission, storage, and distribution as well as wastewater c`olIection. In
many cases, the design is preceded by a feasibility study- and pre -design
effort which sets forth the remote functions to be monitored and/or
controlled, the central control configuration, alternatives in equipment
approach, cost alternatives, improvements to be expected in operation, and
the savings to be -realized.
13. Water Rate Studies. Over 66 analytical and statistical studies relating to
water rates and wastewater rates and costs have been completed. These
studies ht.ve been prepared in support of recommended rates as well as in
Opposition to suggested rate changes. Most supporting studies are based on
detailed investigation. of water consumption patterns and their ri •ojections.
Many rate studies are prepared as an integral part of a complete financial
analysis which considers bend issue financing, taxation on rear property,
reserve funding,_ disposal of excess utility property, other income sources.
and abilit-- to pay. The range of clients f-)r whom rate studies have been
prepared included municipalities, water and irrigation districts, private
utility companies„ government agencies, and individuals.
14_ AppraisaLs. Over 40 appraisal reports primarily involving the value of
#
utility properties have been prepared. The purpose of these reports has been
#
to establish value for the buyer, the seller, or fo;r both. In some instances.
the objectives have been to evaluate system condition and depreciation
requirements as adjuncts to rate investigations, eminent domain
1
proceedings, and negotiated ownership transfers. Appraisals cf various
t,,rpr:s of utilities have been prepared ranging from single water wells to
large irrigation and domestic municipal systems. Appraisal techniques u,,ed
5
include reproduction cost new less depreciation, original cost, substitutional
methods, present -worth concepts, comparable sales, and capitalizad>-n.
1.5. Basin Management and Hyd_ogeology. Staff members have had extensive
.experience in the field of h-�,drogeologicai studies and ground wader basin
a
management. In all of the many mattes plans for water system development
prepared by our firm, a great amount of effort has been expended on
comparing alternative sources of supply and evaluating the economic
potential of these sources. Coordination of imported sources of supply with
local surfaue end ground water supply has always been a major `actor in our
studies. We have participated in an operational economic study of a large
x
ground twatr bast~ in cooperation with a public agency. A mathematical
model [digital) if the ground water basin has been developed by the agency.
'
The model has been verified by geologic and hydrologic analyses, and,
alternative operational plans are presently being studied.
r
++
;Numerous surface and subsurface studies for both local and regional water
resource development programs have been conducted utilizing geologic. -
hydrologic, and geophysical water studies. Combining legal and institutional
policies with water resource potential, basin operations have been developed
f
�x
Background and Major Capabititie0ontinuedl
Comps ,
which are consistent with sound ground water basin management. The firm
has also participated in a number of water rights litigation cases, in which it
has been necessary to recognize proper basin r ita and then, through the use
of these data. correlate surface hydrology. ,'round water hydraulics, and
water quality.
16. Desalination. Extensive experience in the desalination processes is avail-
able within our firm. Completed projects include unit design and pilot plant
studies on treated wastewater effluent by reverse osmosis and electro-'
dialysis. Our firm particiated in the feasibility study for the 150 mgd
nucleardesalting and power generation plant for southern California. This
project was jointly sponsored 'bv the ,2WD. AEA', and the Office of Saline
Water. Work has included the design of the Anaheim Lake Demonstration
Desalination Plant for the 'Orange County Water District. This pilot
`
program was an emper,imental step towards the design of a major 75 mgd
desalting plant to remove salt from ground water. The work consisted of
preliminary engineering, negotiations with the principal domestic and
overseas manufacturers of desalting equipment, and the detail design and
preparation of plans and specifications for the pilot plant, The plant
'
processes included pretreatment, filtration, and water soft t a equipment;
two ion exchange modules; two electrodialysis; modules; two r( ,,erse
osmosis modules, Extensive considerations have been given JMl M and the
distrizes consultants to the effect ^`_ the pilot and proposes. .timate plants
on the environment.. addition, the firm designed and put into operation a
'
5 mgd rc °-erse n�mosis waStewatet• demineralization facility at Water
Factory 21 for the Orange County Water ;district. Several, other
demineralization projects are located in California, Florida; Idahu,_and on
San Nicolas Island for the U.S. Navy,
17. Storm Dr.c rage. The firm has had broad experience in all phases of flood
control and storm drain work, both in preparation of comprehensive master
drainage plans and in detailed design and preparation of plans and specifi-
cations for drainage projects. We have provided designs for appro.dmately
102 storm drain projects, many of which were constructed under the 1958
'
and 1964 bond issue programs (5320 million) of the Los Angeles County Flood
Control District,
1F. Computer F,%cilities. JLfM computer facilities include a large interactive
VAX-11J7$11 computer system. The VAX-11t'780 is a high-performance
mult.progxx;nming computer system. It combines a 32-bit architecture,
efficiq!�-,l memory management, and a virtual memory operating system to
provide essentially unlimited program address space.
The VAX-111780 is one of the fastest systems available. Its processor
'
includes an SK byte write -through memory cache that results in an effective
290 nano -second memory access time. This VAX/VMS virtual memory
operating system provides a multi -tier multi -language programming;
environment on the VAX-1.1/780 hardware- TIhe integral floating point
instructions, efficient scheduler and optional FORTRAN rV-pI:.US language
areide.sl for time-critica5 and scientific computational environments,
Company Background and Major Capabilities (contirued)
Peripheral facilities- of the VAX-11/780 include a, range of small and large
capacity disc drives, magnetic tape plotter, hard copy and video terminals,
line printers and card readers. Its languages include the VAX-11 Macro
assembly langiage and optional VAX-11 FORTRAN IV -PLUS, VAX-11
DATATRIEVE, and VAX-11 COBOL-74/VAX• Use of this 'facility ensures
optimization of the analytical capability of our firm in all phases of
engineering service.
Numerous staff members have been trained and are active in a continuing
educational program in order to provide our clients with the advantages of
computer -applied system design economics. Specialized new programs
developed by our staff, in addition to e:cisting standard programs, offer an
extensive range of applications, including ' hydraulic necwor;cs structural.
critical path and statistical computations, traverse calculations, information
sorting, and mathematical optimization. Utilization of the cnmputer system
is employed whenever evaluations of the situation indicate a valuable
consideration in time consumption and financial benefit to tl'e client.
A number of computerized information retrieval services exist where use is
essential in large-scale search operations. James M. Montgomerv,
Consulting Engineers, Inc. contacts those firms -which have established data
bases in the areas of concern. These bases include:
o ToxiiAe '
o Medline
o N AL/CALK
f) NTLS
O Environ
ATTIC
o EIC
In addition, JMM maintains several time-sharing' terminals which are used to
take advantage of the services of various time-sharing sys,t• -ailable'.
j
Such systems allow data storage and retrieval on a global basi
19. Laboratory Facility. Our firm is, equipped with a completr and
wastewater laboratory certified by the U.S. Environment 'ction
Agency. The facilities of this laboratory permit us to evalurare aJ of the
parameters related to mcdecn practices of :eater treatment e sr'a:_u,ater
treatment and dispose -I Major equipment items include gay ,' �t ja �: r•�nh>,
atomic absorption spectrometer, total organic carbon anal* size
' analyzer, and incubators for viral and bacteriological tests.
20. Architectural Design. Visual appearance of all structures is given prime_
consideration in the development of prcjeet design plans. Our design,
philosophy incorporates creative architecture concepts based on environ-
mental coalitions and economical factors of the project. The firm's fields
of competence in architecture include architectural design, furniture and
fixt re selection, graphics and signing, and color coordination. Our
registered architectural' staff has been responsible fos the architectural
Company'Bac and Major 4 apahilities (continued)
ground
f
design of numerous civil, industrial, commercial, and residential building
prof ects.
21.
international Operations. Our firm has provided consulting services for
numerous international engineering projects involving the design of. water
supply. wastewater, and storm drainage systems. In additionto design and
construction supervision of overseas projects, we have prepared master
planes, feasibility and prefeasibili`ty studies, hvdregeological studies.
financial analyses, and cost appraisals in order to establish parameters for
sound engineering design. We have also provided administrative assistance
,for institutional development of foreign water and sanitation agencies and
have developed effective programs for training personnel in the design,
operation. maintenance, and management of water and wastewater systems.
Our firnn, having b �esl involved in many programs financed under the
auspice: of the ' e kgenr_y for International Development, the
International, B onstruction and Development, the Inter -American
Development 1 she ksian Development Bank, is familiar with the
lending and dat4apr.,cu.sing requirements of these agencies,
ZZ.
Plant Start -Up and Operation. Staff engineers have had extensive exper-
ience in the design, construction. and start-up of industrial process pilot and
prototype installations. - Industr'al piloting has also includedwastewater
concentration and reclamation icr reuse by reverse osmosis, electrodialvsis,
j
and ion exchange tec'iiniques. Biological wastewater treatment pilot wort:
his involved both industrial and municipal waste systems and has been used
4
to obtain design data for plants now under construction. Certified waste-
t
water treatment plant operators on the staff are qualified in plant start-up
and operation,' preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and on -
site investigations,
t
Z3.,
Environmental Impact Studies. Multid4ciplinary teams of environmental,
{
specialists in the fields of bioloq-, hydrology, planning, and engirt Bring have
l
prepared numerous environmental assessments in compliance with applicable
l
federal, state, or local regulations. Environmental studies have concen-
trated on water and wastewater related projects. The scale of these
projects and accompanying assessments has ranged frort, areawide waste
treatwent ma-hagement plans and comprehensive wastewater facilities playas
to indixidaal projects such as reservoirs, pipelines, or treatrnent facilities.
The JM.v1 staff its expe7ienced in environmental regulations and public
participation techniques aswell as in the more technical elements of
environmental assessments.'
t
Z4.
T'eainiiig Programs. In addition to on-the-job training programs associated "
with design, start-up, and operation and maintenazice of ;pater and waste --
water treatment plants, JM. M has provided specialized in-house observatiun
and training programs for engineers sponsored by the Agency for Interna-
tional Development and by our mternatiot_al clients. Typical programs
ranging from one month to a year incluae observation and practizal training
In water ut:lity management and operation, long-range financial planning,
water treatment design, water resources development, and ocean outfall
Ir,
rmv".
Company Background and Major Capabilities (continued)
design. Trainees involved in ,Waster planning and treatment plant design -
programs actively participate in actual project work.
25. Construction -Management Services:. JMM provides some degree of
construction management services for virtually all facilities desiged by
JMM. These services have ranged from fast -tracking design and,construc
tion, monitoring construction, performing all engineering work,; and keeping
all book) and records associated with a project down to simply providing
occasional professional assistance during construction. For a typical job, in [
addition to design, JMM assists its clients during the procurement process,
monitors construction progress, checks shop drawings, negotiates change
orders, makes final inspections, assists with start-up, and performs a large
part of the book work associated with a project. Jivi;vi is extremely
conscious of time and money constraints and gears its work to stay within
the boundaries given. i'vi'M project enprmeers assist contractors and
operating personnel in achieving design criteria, especially during plant
start-up. Project design engineers periodically return to completed projects
to observe their operationandassist operating personnel. Information
obtained from these visits is used to refine subseauent desigrs.-
26. Marine Science and Aquaculture. The Marine Sciences' staff has a wide
range of experience .a the management and planning of aquaculture
research and development as well as experience in commercial aquaculture
operations.. The staff can dray on diverse capabilities covering virtually any
water -related problem and has the complete range of experience to deal �
with the multi -disciplinary pro2lem)�N of aquaculture production. ;
E-
The firm has applied this expertise in aquatic life support systems in the
design and operation of several aquatic parks including the 515 million P
installation at Sea World of Florida and sophisticated _losed systems for
recycling water at the Baltimore Aquarium and Sea World of Ohio. �
Wastewater aquacuJture concepts have been developed in plann .cg studies
for W.E. Disney Enterprises and the San Diego Region Water Reclamation i
Agency relative to a $1.7 million study evaluating the use of aquatic plants ' t
and animals for wastewater treatment. ,
Tnr firm has experience in the design of salmonid I..sh hatcheries in the
Pacific :$orthwest and has designed the hatchery facilities for the state of
Washington. Aquacviture specialists are available for consultation regarding
all phases of commercial aquaculture feasibility studies and facility design.
27. Institutional and Financial PLmning. The firm has developed an extensive
background in the development of alternative institutional and financial
arrangements in support of 'water, wastewater, and water quality plans.
Members of the JMM' staff have extensive backgrounds and liarticular
expertise in the preparation of institutional, economic, :and revenue "
programs including federaljsta;tp loan grant programs, prospective prepara-
tion'for the municipal financing market, and economic feasibility reports in a
support of bond issues
CornpaWckground and Major Capabilities*ntinuedl
JMM has successfully completed over 100 analytical and statistical financial
studies of water and wastewater systems. As part of Z01 facility plans, jMN, i
financial staff members have prepared financial and revenue glans in
accordance with the ?atest federal and state requirements in states where _
special local requirements exist. These plans have been. prepared with
careful consultation with the client and other levels of involved "government.
In this way, the means and approach for funding that portion of the project
not grant eligible, and in creating a revenue program for payment of annual
debt service and operation and mainten=ce costs, has been acceptable to
all parties that are concerned with the financial success of the project
Many water and wastewater system ma_Ster plans completed by the firm in
recent wears have also required implementation plans which include
scheduling, financing, and the development of systems for cost allocations
to the ultimate system customer.
Rate studies and revenue programs require accurate backup data of con-
sumution or discharges by customer classification, as well as other specific
information. Where such data are nonexistent or questionable, our staff has
had :wide experience in creating usable data 'from the examination of water
records, building department records, aerial photographs, census data, and
physical field surveys. Computer programs have been designed by our firm
i to utillze these data in accordance with state guidelines allocating costs to
various combir.stions of loading parameters.
28. Comprehensive and Land Use Planning, JMM offers comprehensive planning
services involving land use on either a community or a,reawide basin. Our
projects of this type have included community land use plans; land capability
and existing land use mapping; improvement and expansion of public
facilities, services, and utilities; preservation and conservation of natural
resource areas; lake shone development criteria: community design; public
and private recreation systems; open space; flood plain management
transportation; fish, wildlife, and water quality preservation; the determina-
tion of f-.:ture growth areas; and zoning regulations, model ordinances, and
plan implementation,
Ourexperience.. and personnel: cover a wide range of land use planning.
' considerations. We are particularly qualified to provide land use planning
assistance to communities experiencing growth and needing to expand public
facilities or preserve environmental resources. Our backgrcimd in public
works facilities and environmental studies adds an important depth to our
comprehensive planning capabilities.
t We have provided comprehensive planning services to the Clark County
x
Regional Planning Golancil at Vancouver, Washington; Gervais, -egon; an;]
Mountain Home, Idaho. In the 'Mountain Home plan, emphasis was placed on
the protection of natural resources. including art important ground water
syste n; protecting future population growth; directing new development into
a 'primary urban service a ea;" preservation_ of agricultural iands; ant,
coordinations with ongoing county planning efforts. We assisted the State o.
Washington, Department of Natural Resources in the development of ;ire
state"s renewable resource pian, and worked with `he Shoshone -Bannock
r
Company Background and Major Capabilities tcontinued)
Tribes in eastern Idaho on the formulation of water -related land develop-
ment policies for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation.
The Tualatin :Hills Park and Pecreation District contracted with J'sM�1 to
prepare a ,park system plan and x recommended action program which
focused, on future budget priorities for alternative park sites that were
associated with school sites. In addition, we prepared a cFgrnponent of the
Oregon State Outdoor Recreation Plan covering future developments, acqui-
sitions, and capital improvements for the Oregon State Park System.
Our firm also has in-depth experience in mapping land capability and
1 existing land use. JMM prepared land capability maps for the Flathead
River Drainage Basin in northwest Montana concerning erosion hazard areas
and septic tank suitability. we prepared eight land capability/char ac-
teristic.luse maps for the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Four state of Idaho
i agencies contracted with JVMM to prepare land use and land capability maps
gfor ten land characteristics and numerous wildlife and environmental quality
i parameters as part of the Idaho Environmental Overview Study. JRdM is also
a frequent contractor to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Oevelopment to perform flood insurance studies=., including the preparation
of flood plain maps. In a water quality plan prepared for the Ada Planning
association, TMM prepared a plan which emphasized land use constraints on
steep slopes and sensitive soils, land adjacent to streams, and the phasing of
future growth witli facility service expansion.
Z �. silviculture. as part of non -point pollution sources as defined under
PL 42-500. the firm has been :involved in several projects involving water
pollution from logging, residue management, and refor=station activities and
their impact on water quality. Emphasis has been placed on solving
problems and making recommendations rela.tiv-- to siltation and thermal and
organic pollution due to the demonstrated significance of these pollutants
associated with the logging industry. Members of the staff have also
prepared +echnical reference reports for use by private and public forest
managers, planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants, public
' forest managers, 'planners, regulatory agencies, contractors, consultants,_
public officials, and interested ndividuals to determine, implement, and
monitor water quality control systems and procedures that are both effec-
tive and efficient and that would implement PL 92-500 concerning non -point
sources of pollutants generated by silviculture activities (excluding the
construction and maintenance of logging haul roads a,id forest chemical
applications),
i
30. Expert Testimony aad Techniral Assistance to Counsel. Because of the
broad exderience of seniorJMM employees :.nu the specialized expe tise of
the 2.1 doctorate holders on the JMM staff, theme employees are frequently
utilized by clients for their expert testimony and technical assistance to
counsel. In preparing for testimony, these expert witnesses have available
the facilities of the JMM, Cal Tech, 11CLa, and USC libraries in southern
calitornia, and the UC Berkeley library in northern, California, In addition,
modern. fully -equipped laboratory and computer facilities are available for
Cdeany Background and Major Capabilities icontinuedl
-etir use. Employees are encouraged to write technical articles and develop
Secialize3 areas of expertise in meeting company needs.'
?�, Other Services. In addition to capabilities in investigations, studies: and
prepara_ion of plans and specifications, we can provide mill inspection and
PS
witness performance tests on all water and wzstewater;.systems equipment �
manufactured in the United States. When required, assistance to the client
in direct procurement of project materials is provided. On a majority of the
domestic design projects, surveyinq, fiela inspection, and contract admini-
stration services are, algo furnished as a part of the engineering contract,
i
i
I
i